Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[00:00:03]

>>> THE STAFF REVIEW OF THE CASES HEARD BY CITY COUNCIL IN THE LAST 60 DAYS, MR. ROBERTSON? I GOT A WEIRD FEEDBACK.

>> TRENTON: THANK YOU. THE FIRST IS A THOROUGHFARE AMENDMENT, FUTURE LINE USE PLAN. THIS LOOKING AT THE SOUTHEASTERN QUADRANT OF THE CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN.

REQUESTING TO REMOVE A PORTION OF THE THOROUGHFARE THAT IS LOCATED IN THE E.T.J. IF ZTHE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL. CITY COUNCIL APPROVED IT ALSO.

THE NEXT ITEM WAS THE TAINMENT EASEMENT ABANDONMENT.

THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DID NOT REVIEW THE CASE, THIS IS THE CASE OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT THAT DID TAKE IT TO CITY COUNCIL TO REMOVE THE EASEMENT ON THE EXISTING PLOT. WHO OCCURRED WAS A PROPERTY OWNER WAS YEARS AGO WANTING TO PLAT THE PROPERTY.

THE SURVEYIER PUT EASEMENTS ALL AROUND PROPERTY.

DIDN'T REALIZE THE SWIMMING POOL WAS IN THE EASEMENT THAT WAS CONSTRUCTED. THEY WENT TO SELL THE PROPERTY AND THAT IS WHY THEY NEEDED TO ABANDON THE EXISTING EASEMENTS NOT BEING USED. THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA WAS THE SUBDIVISION TEXT AMENDMENT. THIS IS TO EXTEND THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FROM ONE YEAR TO TWO YEARS.

THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DID RECOMMEND APPROVAL. THE CITY COUNCIL DID ALSO APPROVE THIS CHANGE. THE NEXT ITEM WAS THE RIDGE POINT PLANNING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT.

THIS WAS BROUGHT BACK TO CITY COUNCIL.

IT WAS CONTINUED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.

AND MOVED TO THE 27TH OF OCTOBER.

THIS ITEM WAS AFTER AMENDMENTS WERE MADE, P PER COUNCIL'S REQUEST, IT WAS APPROVED. THE NEXT ITEM WAS THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE BEANERY ON MAIN STREET.

THIS CAME BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

THIS IS AN EXISTING STRUCTURE WHERE THEY ARE REQUESTING FOR A DRIVE-THRU SERVICE. THE USE WAS -- THE RESTAURANT USE OR THE CAFÉ IS PERMITTED BY RIGHTS SINCE IT'S UNDER 1,000 SQUARE FEET. THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT SPECIFICALLY FOR THE DRIVE-THRU SERVICE.

UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDED APPROVAL BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.

THE NEXT ITEM WAS THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE BLOWING SMOKE CIGAR LOUNGE OFF OF F.M. 663. EXISTING STRUCTURE.

THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT WAS NOT FOR THE CIGAR, THE RETAIL SALE OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS BUT TO SMOKE WITHIN THE BUILDING ITSELF UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCE.

NOT FROM THE ZONING ORDINANCE. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DID RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED THE ITEM AS WELL. THE FINAL CASE WAS A P.D.

AMENDMENT TO AZALEA HOLLOW. THE FRONT-ENTRY GARAGE IS CUSTOM. IT'S NOT THE TYPICAL FRONT-ENTRY PRODUCT. IT DEALS WITH THE VARIOUS ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNS. AND EACH HOME IS CUSTOM -- EACH HOME IN THE SUBDIVISION IS CUSTOM.

THE HOMES THAT WERE ALLOWED TO FROM A FRONT ENTRY GARAGE TYPICALLY WOULD BE SETTING BACK THEN THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT IN ANY OTHER ZONING DISTRICT WITHIN THE CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN.

THAT WAS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL. THOSE ARE ALL THE ITEMS THAT WENT BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL IN THE LAST 60 DAYS. I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AT

THIS TIME. >> DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. ROBERTSON? THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

>> TRENTON: THANK YOU. >> WE WOULD INVITE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO SPEAK ON THE TOPICS WHICH ARE NOW RESCHEDULED FOR HEARING. IF YOU ARE SCHEDULED OR WOULD LIKE TO BE HEARD ON A TOPIC ON THE AGENDA PLEASE WAIT UNTIL THAT TIME TO SPEAK. AND BUT IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO PRESENT, YOU HAVE UP TO THREE MINUTES TO TALK ABOUT ANY TOPIC YOU WOULD LIKE TO TALK ABOUT. AND HOWEVER, THE COMMISSION CANNOT TAKE ACTION ON ANY OF THE ITEMS INS THEY ARE LISTED ON THE

AGENDA. >> TRENTON: I WOULD LIKE TO RECOGNIZE MS. STEPHENS ATTENDING WEBEX FOR THE RECORD.

>> I WOULD ASK THAT WHEN WE GOT TO VOTING.

WE'LL DO VOTE BY ROLL TO GET HER VOTE RECORDED PROPERLY.

OKAY. WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO BE HEARD ON THE CITIZENS AGENDA ITEM? SEEING IN ONE, HE WILL MOVE TO

[CONSENT AGENDA]

THE CONSENT AGENDA. THESE ARE ITEMS ADMINISTERIAL OR

[00:05:02]

ADMINISTRATIVE NATURE THAT DON'T REQUIRE A PUBLIC HEARING.

DO I HAVE A MOTION OR DISCUSSION ON THE TOPICS?

>> SO MADE. >> APPROVAL.

>> MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER BATEMAN.

SECOND? >> SECOND.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: SECOND BY OSBORN.

AYE. COMMISSIONER KOEHLER?

>> AYE. >> COMMISSIONER HILL?

>> AYE. >> COMMISSIONER OSBORN?

>> HERE. >> COMMISSIONER BATEMAN?

>> AYE. >> COMMISSIONER STEPHENS? IS SHE WAVING? IS SHE ONLINE YET?

>> SHE IS ONLINE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: LET'S GIVE HER A SECOND TO TEST IT AND MAKE SURE EVERYTHING IS WORKING SMOOTHLY. COMMISSIONER STEPHENS, IS THAT AN AYE ON THE MINUTES, ON THE CONSENT AGENDA?

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: THANK YOU. WE HEARD THAT.

SO THE CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY.

IN ORDER TO DECREASE RISK OF COVID-19 AND TO TRY TO COMPLY WITH EVERYONE'S SAFETY WE ARE GOING TO MOVE ITEMS AROUND ON THE AGENDA. THE FIRST ITEM IS ITEM 13.

[013 Conduct a public hearing and consider and act upon an ordinance relating to the use and development of ±9.74 acres, being a tract of land in the M. Brenan Survey, Abstract No. 43, by changing the zoning from Agricultural (A) District to a Planned Development (PD) District for single-family residential uses. The property is generally located at 1120 Apple Lane (Case No. Z02-2021-11).]

IF SECOND WILL BE NUMBER 12 BASED ON THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION. START WITH NUMBER 13, PLEASE.

I SHOULD HAVE READ IT OUT. LET ME DO THAT QUICKLY.

13. OKAY.

THIS WILL BE TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER AND ACT UPON AN ORDINANCE RELATED TO THE USE AND DEVELOPMENT OF 9.74 ACRES BEING A TRACT OF LAND -- AM I READING THE RIGHT ONE? BRENAN SURVEY? YES.

BY CHANGING THE ZONING FROM AGRICULTURE "A" DISTRICT TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT P.D. DISTRICT FOR THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES. THE PROPERTY IS GENERALLY

LOCATED AT 1120 APPLE LANE. >> THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS. THIS IS LOCATED ALONG APPLE LANE AND IT CONTAINS ONE SINGLE FAMILY HOME ON OVER NINE ACRES OF LAND CURRENTLY. THE APPLICANT BROUGHT A SIMILAR CASE TO THE SAME COMMISSION IN SEPTEMBER WHICH WAS LATER WITHDRAWN BY THE APPLICANT PRIOR TO IT GOING TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING. THE APPLICANT IS NOW LOOKING TO REZONE THE SAME NINE ACRES TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IN LIEU OF TRYING TO GO TO THE STRAIGHT ZONE S.F.-2 OR THE SINGLE-FAMILY 2. THE PROPERTY CURRENTLY SURROUNDED BY THE AGRICULTURAL ZONING WITH THE SURROUNDING TRACTS FROM .7 OF ACRE TO SEVERAL ACRES IN SIZE.

THIS IS DESIGNATED AS COUNTRY MODULE AND IT CALLS FOR THE LOTS RANGING FROM FROM THE LOT SIZES OF 1-3 ACRES IN SIZE BUT IT ALSO DOES SAY THAT THE FUTURE DEV DEVELOPMENT SHOULD CORE RESPONSIBILITY WITH THE SF1 DISTRICT WITH MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF TWO ACRES. A SITE PLAN WAS PROVIDED AND IT DOES SHOW HOW THE PROPERTY WILL BE DIVIDED IN THE VARIOUS LOT SIZES. THAT IS WHAT I SHOW ON THE SCREEN. BASE ON THE APPLICANT'S CALCULATIONS THE LOTS RANGE 1.3 ACRES, COUPLE OF 2.1 ACRES AND 1.3 ACRES IN SIZE. NO MORE THAN FOUR LOTS WILL BE ALLOWED ON THE NINE-ACRE TRACK. HOMES SHALL CONTAIN ARTICULATED FACADE. NO ONE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE WILL BE REPEATED FOR ANY OF THE LOTS DEVELOPED IN THE FOUR-LOT DEVELOPMENT. DRAFT ORDINANCE IS SPECIFIC TO DESIGN THE HOMES ARE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED ON THE CHARACTERISTICS IN THE ELEVATIONS THAT YOU SEE HERE ON THE SCREEN. ALL HOMES HAVE SIDE-ENTRY GARAGES. FRONT-ENTRY AND J-SWING GARAGE ARE NOT ALLOWED FOR THE GARAGE. APPLE LANE WAS CONSTRUCTED BY THE COUNTY. SINCE THE ANNEXLATION OF 2008 THE ROAD HAS BEEN MAINTAINED BY THE CITY.

THE CURRENT WIDTH OF APPLE LANE FRONTING AREA 12 TO 13 FEET WIDE BUT WAS RECENTLY OVERLAID WITH THE ASPHALT TO HELP IMPROVE THE CURRENT CONDITION. LETTERS WERE MAILED TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS IN 200 FEET. TO DATE, THE STAFF RECEIVED ONE LETTER OF OPPOSITION IN THE 200 FEET.

STAFF REEVERED ANOTHER FOUR LETTERS IN OPPOSITION.

ONE ALSO IN SUPPORT FALLING OUTSIDE OF THE 200-FOOT BUFFER.

WE MAY HAVE RECEIVED MORE LETTERS TONIGHT POSSIBLY.

BUT WE'LL ALLOW YOU TO READ THOSE IN TO THE RECORD ALSO, MR. CHAIRMAN. BASED ON THE COUNTRY MODULES

[00:10:01]

GUIDANCE TO THE LOT SIZE, GARAGE ORIENTATION AND THEN IN COMBINATION WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL CONTROLS THAT THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING THE STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REZONE REQUEST AS PRESENTED. WITH THAT I CAN TAKE ANY

QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: REFRESH, WHAT WAS THE ORIGINAL PLAT WHEN THIS CAME BEFORE US? THE SAME EXACT PLAT THAT WE HAVE HERE TONIGHT?

OR WHAT IS THE CHANGE? >> THE SITE PLAN?

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: SITE PLAN. >> ORIGINALLY WHAT THE APPLICANT WAS TRYING TO DO, THEY HAD BROKEN THIS UP.

THEY HAD SIX LOTS. FIVE OR SIX LOTS THEY WERE ULTIMATELY TRYING TO GET. THE SITE PLAN THEY PROVIDED BEFORE REALLY, WE COULDN'T HOLD THEM TO THE SITE PLAN ANYWAY BECAUSE THEY WERE TRYING TO GO STRAIGHT SEWN SF2.

IF YOU GO STRAIGHT ZONE, YOU BASICALLY JUST HAVE TO HAVE A MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF ONE ACRE AND MINIMUM LOT WIDTH OF 150 FEET.

OR 125 FEET. SO, AS MANY LOTS AS THEY COULD FIT PRIOR TO THIS, THEY WOULD HAVE THAT RIGHT TO BE ABLE TO DO THAT. IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE THE APPLICANT IS TRYING TO DO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.

SO THEY ARE HELD TO THIS SITE PLAN.

ESSENTIALLY, LIMITING THEM TO ONLY FOUR LOTS.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

>> SO THEY CAN'T CHANGE IF IT WERE TO BE APPROVED, THAT IS

WHAT IT HAS TO BE? >> MARCOS: YES, SIR.

>> SO WHAT IF THEY, WHAT IF THIS WAS APPROVED AND THEY CHANGED THEIR MIND AND WANTED TO COME BACK? DO THEY GO THROUGH THE WHOLE PROCESS ALL OVER AGAIN?

>> MARCOS: ABSOLUTELY, SIR. YES, SIR.

>> OKAY. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: IN OUR NEW DEVELOPMENTS WHEN PEOPLE BUILD ONE-ACRE LOTS THEY ARE REQUIRED TO PUT SIDEWALKS IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS, CORRECT? THEY CAN'T DO BAR DITCHES AND UNIMPROVED, LIKE BASICALLY A

ROAD, RIGHT? >> MARCOS: THAT DEPENDS.

IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE, THE ROAD AND LET ME MOVE OVER TO THE ROAD AND WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. THE ROAD IS WHAT WE CALL A RURAL SECTION. SO WITH A RURAL SECTION, YOU DO NOT HAVE THE SIDEWALKS. ANYTHING OVER ONE ACRE DOES NOT REQUIRE A SIDEWALK PER THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS.

ONLY TIME WE REQUIRE SIDEWALKS IS IF THEY ARE UNDER AN ACRE AND THEY ARE DOING CURB AND GUTTER. OR IF THE APPLICANT CHOOSES TO PUT THE SIDEWALKS IN ANYTHING OVER AN ACRE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? OKAY. WOULD -- THANK YOU, MARCOS.

>> MARCOS: THANK YOU. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: WOULD THE APPLICANT LIKE TO MAKE A PRESENTATION? YES, SIR. COME ON UP.

STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. AND YOUR ADDRESS.

>> GUEST SPEAKER: HELLO. JORDAN RYNUS, 7460 DYLAN CIRCLE, MIDLOTHIAN, TEXAS. SO AS MARCOS STATED WE ARE BACK WITH AN ALTERNATIVE. WE HEARD YOURSELVES AND SOME OF OUR NEIGHBORS LOUD AND CLEAR LAST TIME.

SO, WE HAVE COME UP WITH AN ALTERNATIVE THAT WE THINK WORKS FOR US AND ACCOMPLISHES A LOT OF THE CONCERNS THAT WERE COMMENTED BY YOURSELVES AND THEM. THE BIG THING IS COMMITTING OURSELVES TO THE RESOUNDING THING WE HEARD.

YOU ARE ASKING FOR A ONE-ACRE ZONING.

SO YOU COULD BULLDOZE THE EXISTING HOUSE AND YOU COULD PUT NINE ONE-ACRE LOTS ON IT IF YOU SO CHOSE.

THE LAYOUT HERE IS TO HOLD OURSELVES ACCOUNTABLE TO SOME ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS AND TO HOLD OURSELVES ACCOUNTABLE TO PLAT WE BELIEVE BETTER UTILIZES THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY ITSELF. FOR THE CITY.

BUT ALSO MAINTAINS THE COUNTRY FEEL.

ADEQUATE SPACING AND THE LARGER SIZE LOTS THAT APPLE LANE

CURRENTLY ENJOYS. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: OKAY.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR APPLICANT? >> I DO.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: YES, SIR. >> ARE YOU PLANNING TO BUILD HOUSES AND JUST SELL THE LOT AND THE HOUSE? OR ARE YOU DOW GOING TO SELL THT AND LET PEOPLE BUILD THE HOUSE?

>> PROBABLY A COMBINATION OF BOTH.

ONE OF THE LOTS WOULD BE RETAINED BY THE OWNER.

AS OF RIGHT NOW TO BE BUILT ON AND OCCUPIED BY THEMSELVES.

THE OTHER TWO LOTS WOULD BE SOLD.

THEY WOULD BE SUBJECT TO THE BUILDING REQUIREMENTS.

SO ANYBODY THAT COULD BE BUYING THEM WOULD BE NEEDING TO ADHERE TO THOSE WHEN THEY CONSTRUCT ON THE PROPERTY.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR APPLICANT? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.

AT THIS TIME WE'LL HEAR FROM MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC.

I WILL CALL YOUR NAME. YOU WILL HAVE UP TO THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK. PLEASE HONOR THAT.

ALSO IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN COVERED BY SOMEONE ELSE, FEEL FREE TO DEFER YOUR TIME TO THEM AND TRY TO KEEP THE COMMENTS NEW AND GERMANE TO THE DISCUSSION.

THE FIRST SPEAKER WE HAVE SIGNED UP IS RANDY REED.

[00:15:03]

MR. REED? STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR

ADDRESS, PLEASE. >> PUBLIC SPEAKER: YES.

I'M RANDY REED. MY ADDRESS IS 1390 APPLE LANE.

THANK YOU FOR LETTING ME SPEAK. SOME OF THE ISSUES THAT I SEE ON DIVIDING THIS UP ARE THAT THE INFRASTRUCTURE IS NOT CAPABLE OF ADEQUATELY IS SUPPLYING THE EXTRA RESIDENCES IN THE AREA.

IT'S ALREADY BEEN POINTED OUT THAT THE ROAD IS ONLY 12-FOOT WIDE. YOU CANNOT PASS TWO CARS SIDE-BY-SIDE GOING IN OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS IN THAT AREA.

IT WAS RECENTLY THAT THE CITY DECIDED TO REPAVE THE ROAD.

I WAS IN POOR CONDITION. IT HAD MULTIPLE POTHOLES AND IT WAS REPAVED AFTER REQUESTS BY THE CITIZENS.

SOME OF THE ISSUES IS THE WATER LINE IN THERE IS AN OLD WATER LINE. I BELIEVE, AND I'M NOT EXACTLY SURE. IT'S EITHER A TWO OR A THREE-INCH WATER LINE THAT RUNS UP THROUGH THERE.

ADDITIONALLY, THERE IS NO SEWER AVAILABLE OUT THERE.

THAT HAS NEVER BEEN PUT IN BY THE CITY.

AFTER WE WERE INCORPORATED IN TO THE CITY.

WITHOUT SEWER THEY WILL HAVE TO GO TO AEROBIC SYSTEM.

I'M NOT SURE OF THE SYSTEM BUT IT WOULD BE TIGHT FOR THOSE SIZE LOTS. ADDITIONALLY, YOU HAVE THE LOT SLOPES AS YOU ARE LOOKING AT IT RIGHT HERE TOWARD US.

ANY RUN OFF IS GOING TO COME TO THE STREET.

THERE IS ALREADY ISSUES WITH THE DRAINAGE IN THAT AREA WHEN WE HAVE SEVERE RAIN. IN FACT, THE FOLKS THAT ARE JUST DOWN THE STREET FROM IT ROUTINELY HAVE TO PUT UP WITH FLOODING OF THEIR BACKYARDS AND THINGS ON THAT LINE.

IF WE ADDED ADDITIONAL ROOFTOPS IN THERE, AND ADDITIONAL DRIVEWAYS, THAT IS ONLY GOING TO AGGRAVATE THE PROBLEM AND COMPOUND THE PROBLEM WHICH, OF COURSE, NO ONE WANTS.

IF THE CITY IS WILLING TO COME IN, CURB, GUTTER IT, PUT IN NEW WATER LINES, GIVE US SEWER. COMPLETE THE ROAD LIKE WE WERE ORIGINALLY PROMISED I MIGHT BE IN SUPPORT OF IT.

RIGHT NOW THIS IS A NO-WIN FOR US.

WHEN WE BOUGHT OUT THERE, WE BOUGHT FIVE ACRES.

YOU DON'T THINK THERE HAS BEEN ANOTHER LOT THAT HAS BEEN CHOPPED UP LIKE THIS ONE HAS BEEN PROPOSED.

MS. GREEN HAD THIS LOT SINCE THE '60S.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: THANK YOU, MR. REED.

I APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS. THE NEXT SPEAKER IS ABEL WINDSOR. AFTER MR. WINDSOR IS DAVID

SHORT. >> PUBLIC SPEAKER: THANK YOU

VERY MUCH. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: HELLO,

MR. WINDSOR. >> PUBLIC SPEAKER: I WANT TO AGREE WITH WHAT MR. REED SAID AND I CONCUR WITH THAT.

WE WERE TOLD, WE JUST BROKE UP OUR SECTION OF LAND, TOO.

WE WERE TOLD THAT THE DIMENSIONS WERE FOUR AUKE ACRES, NOT TWO A.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: WHERE IS YOUR SECTION OF LAND?

>> 910 APPLE COURT. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: WE LOOKED AT A MAP. WHERE IS THAT?

>> PUBLIC SPEAKER: LET'S SEE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: 9.4 ACRES?

>> PUBLIC SPEAKER: I WAS TOLD BY TRENT AND EVERYONE THAT THE ACREAGE HAD TO BE FOUR ACRES IN SECTION.

REALLY THERE IS ONLY ONE ENTRY AND EXIT TO APPLE LANE.

SO, I JUST REALLY CAN'T SUPPORT ANY MORE TRAFFIC IN OUR AREA.

I HAVE LIVED THERE FOR 32 YEARS. I REALLY AM AGAINST, YOU KNOW, MULTITUDE OF HOMES BUILT IN THE AREA.

THAT IS ALL I HAVE TO SAY. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: THANK YOU, SIR. NEXT PERSON UP IS DAVID SHORT.

FOLLOWING MR. SHARP WILL BE MR. KUYKENDAHL.

DID I SAY IT RIGHT? >> CLOSE ENOUGH.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: SORRY. >> PUBLIC SPEAKER: IS IT OKAY

IF I TAKE IT OFF? >> MEMBER ALTMAN: YOU CAN TAKE

IT OFF. >> PUBLIC SPEAKER: I CAN BREATHE. I TALKED LAST TIME ABOUT WE NEEDED THE PROPERTY, SO PEOPLE COULD HAVE ANIMALS.

IF YOU CUT THEM DOWN TO TWO ACRES OR ONE ACRE THERE IS NO WAY YOU WILL GET ANIMALS LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAS. IF THEY CUT DOWN TO 1.3 ACRES, IF THEY SOLD THE PROPERTY NEXT DOOR, WOULD THEY AUTOMATICALLY BE ABLE TO GO TO 1.3 ACRES? BECAUSE IT'S ALREADY SET IN?

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: NOT NECESSARILY.

THEY WOULD HAVE TO COME BACK FOR A HEARING LIKE THIS.

[00:20:02]

BUT IT WOULD BE LIKE FOR EXAMPLE THE 37.9 ACRES DEVELOPED IN THE FUTURE, THAT IS TO THE SOUTH OF THAT.

WE LOOK AT THAT. THAT WOULD BE ADJOINING USE.

THAT IS WHAT IT WOULD LEAN. THEY WOULD BE MORE LIKELY TO GET

A ONE-ACRE TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT. >> PUBLIC SPEAKER: SO WHEN OTHER PEOPLE SELL OR DEVELOPERS COME AND THEY BUY SOMETHING THEY CAN COME IN TO SAY OKAY, YOU HAVE ALREADY SAID 1.3 IS FINE.

WE WANT TO DIVIDE EVERYTHING UP TO 1.3.

YOU ARE BASICALLY ARE GOING TO BE STUCK ON THAT.

IS THAT A TRUE STATEMENT? >> MEMBER ALTMAN: THAT COULD BE VERY WELL. WE WOULD HAVE TO LOOK AT THE CIRCUMSTANCES BUT THAT IS POSSIBLE, MR. SHORT.

>> PUBLIC SPEAKER: BECAUSE WE GET OFFERS TWO TO THREE TIMES A WEEK FOR PEOPLE TO BUY OUR PROPERTY.

I KNOW ONCE THIS GOES IN THAT PEOPLE ON BOTH SIDES, THEY ARE GOING TO BE SAY HEY, LET'S TAKE THE THREE ACRES AND PUT IT TO 1.3 OR TAKE THE FIVE ACRES AND THEN WE GOT A BUNCH MORE HOUSES.

THEN WE LOSE OUR WAY OF LIFE THAT WE W ARE USED TO NOW.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: THANK YOU, MR. SHORT.

>> CAN YOU SHOW WHERE YOUR PROPERTY IN RELATION TO THE PROPERTY?

>> HOW MANY ACRES DO YOU HAVE, MR. SHORT?

>> PUBLIC SPEAKER: RIGHT AT 16.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: OKAY. >> PUBLIC SPEAKER: WHEN YOU COME UP APPLE LANE AND YOU MAKE THE TURN, WE ARE RIGHT THERE.

WE HAVE A LOT OF ROAD FRONTAGE. IT'S NICE, IT WOULD BE EASY TO BE DEVELOPED BUT I WANT TO KEEP OUR ANIMALS THERE.

THE MORE YOU GET PEOPLE THAT DON'T HAVE ANIMALS, THEY DON'T APPRECIATE WHAT WE HAVE. YOU KNOW, ALL OF OUR NEIGHBORS HAVE GOT PIGS -- NOT PIGS. GOATS AND DONKEYS AND HORSES AND COWS. WE JUST WANT TO KEEP IT THIS WAY. COUNTRY HERE IN TOWN.

THANK YOU. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: THANK YOU, MR. SHORT. ALL RIGHT.

MR. KUYKENDAHL? AFTER MR. KUYKENDAHL WE'LL HAVE

MS. BAKER. >> PUBLIC SPEAKER: I LIVE AT 720 APPLE LANE. WHICH IS DOWN FROM DAVID ON THE ORIGINAL COMING IN THERE. AND RANDY AND DAVID AND ABEL PRETTY MUCH COVERED EVERYTHING. I HAVE BEEN THERE 27 YEARS.

WHEN I MOVED IN MIDLOTHIAN WAS PURELY ALL COUNTRY OUT THERE.

WE MOVED IN FOR THE HORSES THAT WE HAVE WITH THE KIDS AND WHAT HAVE YOU. I ROUGHLY HAVE FIVE AND A HALF ACRES. BASICALLY WE WERE LOCKED IN.

YOU GOT ONE ENTRANCE IN AND OUT. IT'S PRETTY MUCH THE HOUSES THAT ARE THERE NOW ARE THE SAME HOUSE THAT WERE THERE 27 YEARS AGO.

NOW IT'S GROWN ALL ABOUT ME. WE HAVE NEIGHBORHOODS.

THE DAIRY IS GONE. LAWSON TURNED IN TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. WHAT HAVE YOU.

WE ARE STILL A LITTLE RANCHETTE COMMUNITY WITH THE LIVESTOCK.

I KNOW YOU GOT 9 SOMETHING ACRES THERE AND THAT IS FINE.

I'M FINE WITH BREAKING IT IN TO FIVE ACRES.

BUILD TWO HOUSES. BUT KEEP IT WHERE IN AGRICULTURE WHAT WE'VE GOT. THE FEAR I HAVE, AS DAVID SAID IF YOU BREAK IT DOWN TO 1.3 ACRES THAT IS OPENING THE DOOR FOR EVERYBODY ELSE TO START COMING IN TO -- HECK, IF I WANT TO MOVE OUT I COULD BREAK MINE UP TO THREE LOTS.

BUILD HOUSES ON THAT. TRIPLE MY MONEY.

I'M NOT GOING TO LIVE THERE ANYMORE.

I DON'T PLAN ON MOVING. I PLAN TO REQUIRE AND LET MY KIDS HAVE THE PLACE OR SOMETHING.

THAT IS ALL I GOT TO SAY. THANK YOU.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: THANK YOU, MR. KUYKENDAHL.

MS. BAKER? AFTER MS. BAKER WILL BE DEBBIE

MEYERS. >> PUBLIC SPEAKER: HI.

THANK Y'ALL FOR LETTING ME HAVE THE PRIVILEGE TO SPEAK.

FIRST, I WOULD LIKE TO SEND MY APOLOGIES TO ALL OF THE PEOPLE IN APPLE. THIS WAS MY PARENTS' PROPERTY.

WE WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR DOING MY MOTHER'S WISHES WHICH WAS NEVER TO BREAK UP THE PROPERTY. SHE WANTED IT TO BE A FAMILY UNIT. SHE WANTED TO HONOR HER NEIGHBORS AND HER NEIGHBORS' COMMITMENT THAT SHE WOULD NOT BREAK UP HER PROPERTY AND SELL IT OFF IN PIECES.

IN ORDER FOR US TO SELL THE PROPERTY, ALL THREE OF HER CHILDREN HAD TO AGREE. MY OLDEST BROTHER WAS THE EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE. BUT I WAS MY MOM'S DAUGHTER.

I SPENT A LOT OF TIME WITH MOM. SHE WAS MY BEST FRIEND FOR YEARS. I SPENT THE LAST FEW YEARS CARING FOR HER. I KNEW WHAT HER WISHES WERE AND WHAT HER PROMISES WERE TO HER NEIGHBORS.

I WOULD HAVE NEVER AGREED TO THE SALE IF I WOULD HAVE KNOWN THIS WAS GOING TO HAPPEN. I WAS TOLD BY MY BROTHER THAT THE PERSON BUYING THE PROPERTY WAS GOING TO FIX THE HOUSE UP FOR HIS DAUGHTER. HE WAS GOING TO BUILD A HOUSE IN THE FIVE ACRES TO THE WEST. THAT WAS FINE.

IT WAS GOING TO BE A FAMILY COMMUNITY PROPERTY.

[00:25:02]

ONLY TWO HOMES BUILT ON THE AREA.

PER EXISTING AND ONE NEW. SO I AGREED AND I SAID OKAY.

AND I PUT MY NAME WITH MY BROTHERS.

OKAY. WELL, THEN, I HEARD RUMOR THAT WAS NOT GOING TO BE THE INTENT. AND THAT THE INTENT WAS TO BREAK IT UP. I WENT BACK TO MY BROTHER.

AND TOLD HIM. AND IN HIS OPINION IT WAS RUMOR UNLESS THE REALTOR OR THE PERSON BUYING THE PROPERTY TOLD HIM DIFFERENT. NOBODY EVER TOLD HIM DIFFERENTLY. SO I'M JUST SAYING THAT THIS WOULD NOT BE GOING ON, NOT AT ALL, NONE OF THIS WOULD BE GOING ON IF I WOULD HAVE KNOWN WHAT THE INTENT WAS GOING TO BE.

I WOULD HAVE NEVER AGREED TO THE SALE.

MY PARENTS WERE ONE OF THE FIRST PEOPLE WHO BOUGHT OUT THERE FROM MR. APPLE. HE WAS SELLING IT OFF TO POLICEMEN FIRST. MY DAD WAS A DALLAS POLICEMAN.

BOB SMART WAS A DALLAS POLICEMAN.

MR. LITTLE WAS MY DAD'S BEST FRIEND WHO LIVED ACROSS THE STREET. WE USED TO JOKE ABOUT THE COMMUNITY BEING CALLED THE BIG GREEN SMART APPLE.

OR LITTLE GREEN SMART APPLE. ANYWAY, SO IT WAS A FAMILY-ORIENTED COMMUNITY. THEY WERE ONLY SELLING IN 15-ACRE LOTS OR BETTER AT THAT PARTICULAR TIME IN THE '60S.

SO I JUST BEG THAT WE KEEP THE PROPERTY AS IT IS.

IN THE AGRICULTURAL AREA. MY PARENTS HAD COWS THERE AND HORSES THERE. MY BROTHER WAS IN F.F.A. AND HE RAISED PIGS THERE. SO THAT IS WHAT THAT COMMUNITY IS SUPPOSED TO BE AND WHAT IT SHOULD REMAIN.

I AM SO SORRY. SO VERY SORRY THAT Y'ALL ARE HAVING TO GO THROUGH THIS RIGHT NOW.

THANK YOU. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: THANK YOU, MS. BAKER. DO YOU HAVE A QUESTION? ALL RIGHT. MS. MEYERS?

>> PUBLIC SPEAKER: HELLO. I'M DEBBIE MEYERS AT 1131 APPLE LANE. THEY HAVE PRETTY MUCH COVERED EVERYTHING I WAS GOING TO SAY ABOUT THE TRAFFIC.

THE LIVESTOCK. THE WATER DRAINOFF.

ALL OF THAT. I REALLY DON'T HAVE A LOT TO SAY BUT I WOULD LIKE IT TO BE KNOWN I AM STRONGLY OPPOSED TO IT.

I'M DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM THAT PROPERTY.

I WOULD PROBABLY BE ONE OF THE MOST AFFECTED BY THIS DIVISION.

I REALLY DON'T HAVE MUCH ELSE TO SAY.

THANK YOU. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: THANK YOU.

I BELIEVE I'M NOW AT THE POINT OF THE PRESENTATION WHERE I HAVE NO MORE PEOPLE THAT HAVE SIGNED UP TO BE SPEAKERS.

IF THAT IS INCORRECT, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND.

YES, SIR. WOULD YOU LIKE TO COME FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME? GO AHEAD.

>> PUBLIC SPEAKER: MY NAME IS CODY HARRELLS.

731 APPLE LANE. I LIVE NEXT TO THE WELL.

SO, DECISION THAT IS MADE HERE TONIGHT IS GOING TO DETERMINE WHETHER THIS STAYS AS IT IS OR TURNS IN TO ANOTHER LOSS OF FARMS. AS YOU CAN SEE, WE ARE A VERY PASSIONATE GROUP. YOU CAN'T PUT A PRICE ON PASSION. BUT WE HAVE SOMEBODY WHO SAYS THAT YOU CAN. SO, ALL IN ALL, WE JUST LIKE TO LIVE OUR LIFE THE WAY IT WAS WHEN WE BOUGHT OUR HOUSE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: CODY, HOW MANY ACRES DO YOU LIVE ON OUT

THERE? >> TWO BUT I LIVE NEXT TO WELL

THAT NOBODY CAN LIVE ON. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: CODY HIERHOLSER. I'LL PUT YOU ON A SPEAKER.

IS ANYBODY THAT IS A NONSPEAKER THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN COME FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

>> PUBLIC SPEAKER: I'M ANTHONY CALONA 990 APPLE LANE.

I LIVE NEXT DOOR TO THIS FIASCO THAT THEY ARE TRYING TO PULL.

I'M VERY UPSET. I WAS MARRIED TO MS. BAKER FOR 20-PLUS I BOUGHT THE PLACE FROM HER PARENTS. I GREW UP WITH THEM.

I WENT TO SCHOOL WITH HER BROTHERS.

PLAYED FOOTBALL. GRADUATED FROM MIDLOTHIAN.

EARLY '70S. I GOT OUT OF THE MILITARY.

I CAME OUT THERE FOR A PLACE TO LIVE.

THAT IS MY HOME. I DON'T WANT TO SEE IT TRASHED.

OKAY? I DON'T WANT A BUNCH OF HOUSES.

IF I WANTED TO LIVE IN A NEIGHBORHOOD, ALL THEM NEIGHBORHOODS Y'ALL ARE BUILDING OUT HERE, I COULD GO GET IN ONE.

I DON'T WANT THAT. THIS IS MY PEACE.

THIS IS MY PRIVACY. THIS IS MY PLACE.

WE DON'T WANT THIS TO HAPPEN. SO, I JUST HOPE YOU WILL, I'M BEGGING YOU. HELP US OUT.

THANK YOU. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: OKAY.

ALL RIGHT. ONE MORE TIME.

ANY ONE THAT I HAVE LISTED, ALL THE REST ARE NONSPEAKERS.

I WILL LEAD OUT THE NAME AND PERHAPS SHORT COMMENT AND SUMMARY OF THE COMMENTS IF THEY HAVE MADE THOSE.

IF ANYONE WANTS TO SAY THEIR OWN SPEECH, THEY CAN NOW.

[00:30:01]

SEEING NONE I'LL GO AHEAD AND START THE PROCESS.

BRANT AND MINDY MALLOCK STATED IN THEY ARE IN OPPOSITION.

991 APPLE LANE. MIDLOTHIAN.

DARRELL WALTERS FLANAGAN 1310 APPLE LANE HAVE REGISTERED OPPOSITION. JOHN AND ALLISON SHANNON, 111 APPLE LANE. MIDLOTHIAN, TEXAS.

THE ROAD IS NOT SUFFICIENT FOR AN ADDITION OF SO MANY NEW RESIDENTS. THE UTILITY STATUS IS INADEQUATE FOR THE NUMBER OF HOMES AND REGISTERED IN OPPOSITION.

OPPOSITION BY MATT FABISH 941 APPLE LANE IS NONSPEAKER.

MR. KUYKENDAHL HAS ALREADY SPOKEN.

PEPPER AND DIANA KUYKENDAHL ALSO MADE A STATEMENT THAT THEY ARE IN OPPOSITION. AND AGAIN, STATEMENTS WERE MADE BY KUYKENDAHL AND REFLECTED IN THE LETTER.

WE HAVE JOHN WAGNER REGISTERED IN OPPOSITION AT 1521 APPLE COURT. OTHERS HAVE TO HAVE FOUR ACRES FOR ANOTHER DWELLING. JIMMY GRIFFITH, 1520 APPLE COURT, MIDLOTHIAN, TEXAS, REGISTERED IN OPPOSITION.

PAT REAGAN 1341 APPLE COURT. REGISTERED IN OPPOSITION.

DEBBIE AND JASON MEYERS 1131 APPLE LANE REGISTERED IN OPPOSITION. STATE NEEDS TO STAY ZONED AGRICULTURE. THE ROADS CANNOT HANDLE THE TRAFFIC AND WATER ISSUES THAT WILL BE CAUSED TO THE END OF OUR STREET. THEN WE HAVE A STATEMENT BY ROBERT AND LEILA CARBALL IN SUPPORT OF THE ITEM.

I WILL STATE THIS. WE WANT OUR THOUGHTS TO BE KNOWN AT THE PROPERTY OF 1120 APPLE LANE IN MIDLOTHIAN.

WE, ROBERT AND LEILA, HAVE BEEN RESIDENCE OF 541 APPLE LANE FOR OVER 40 YEARS. WE HAVE BEEN MARRIED OVER 50 YEARS AND RAISED OUR SON AND DAUGHTER ON APPLE LANE.

OUR DAUGHTER NOW WANTS TO RELOCATE BACK TO US CLOSE, FAMILY AND FRIEND. WE WOULD LOVE TO HAVE OUR DAUGHTER AND HER BOYFRIEND RANDALL CLOSE TO US AGAIN.

WE LOOK FORWARD TO HELP THEM AND SEE THE TOUCHES FOR THEM TO MAKE THE HOME THEIRS. WE FEEL THIS WILL ONLY IMPROVE AREA AND BRING VALUE TO THE AREA.

THANK YOU, COUNCIL AND FELLOW NEIGHBORS.

ROBERT AND LEILA CARBAHALL. A SECOND ONE, DEAR NEIGHBORS AND THE COUNCIL I WANT TO ADDRESS THE CONCERN OF THE APPLE LANE, NEIGHBORS AND THE COUNCIL REGARDING THE PROPOSED PLAN.

LOCATED 1120 APPLE LANE. MY NAME IS LAURIE CHAPMAN CARBAHALL. ME AND MY BOYFRIEND WOULD LIKE TO BE NEW NEIGHBORS ON APPLE LANE.

I GREW UP ON APPLE LANE AND LIVED THERE UNTIL I GRADUATED FROM MIDLOTHIAN HIGH SCHOOL 1995.

ALONG WITH MY PARENTS WHO HAVE BEEN PARRIED OVER 50 YEARS AND STILL RESIDE THERE. MY OLDER ONLY BROTHER LIVES A FEW STREETS OVER ON BELMONT DRIVE.

I FEEL GROWING UP WE WERE GOOD NEIGHBORS.

I REMEMBER THE DAYS OF HEARING THE HONK OF A NEIGHBOR DRIVING BY AND SAYING HELLO OR SIMPLE WAVE, WHICH MY PARENTS STILL DO TO WHOEVER DRIVES BY WHEN THEY ARE NEIGHBORS THAT HAVE BEEN THERE FOR YEARS OR NEW NEIGHBORS THAT MOVED IN OVER THE YEARS.

I FEEL APPLE LANE HAS ALWAYS BEEN WELCOMING.

IT WAS ALWAYS FUN TO HAVE THE GARAGE SALES AND MOM AND DAD AND TALKING TO EVERYONE AND HEARING STORIES OF MY PARENTS WHO ARE LIFE-LONG RESIDENTS. A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO I DECIDED TO TRY CITY LIFE IN MANSFIELD, TEXAS.

AFTER BEING HERE I CAN SAY IT'S NOT HOME WITHOUT MY FAMILY HERE.

WE WANT TO ESTABLISH ROOTS BACK TO THE COUNTRY ON APPLE CLOSE TO FAMILY AND FRIENDS. BOTH OF OUR FAMILIES ARE SMALL AND WE FEEL MIDLOTHIAN COULD GIVE US SPACE WE NEED TO ENJOY THE QUIET AND PLACE TO UNWIND AND RELAX AFTER A LONG HARD WEEK WITH OUR FAMILY. FRIENDS AND HOPEFULLY NEW NEIGHBORS. WE ARE HARDWORKING, FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES OF UPS AND FAMILY-ORIENTED PEOPLE.

AS MY PARENTS AGE I HOPE WE CAN HELP THEM WITH WHATEVER THEY NEED. MY ENTIRE IMMEDIATE FAMILY WOULD BE IN A TWO-MILE RADIUS OF EACH OTHER.

I HAVE TWO GROWN SONS 24, 25 WHO ESTABLISHED LIVE AND HOME OF THEIR OWN AS WELL IN MIDLOTHIAN. I'M EXCITED TO SAY I EXPECT MY FIRST GRANDCHILD. RANDALL HAS THREE DAUGHTERS 9 TO 15 WHO WOULD LOVE TO ENJOY PLAYING DAYS OUTSIDE AND ENJOYING THE SPACE. WE WOULD HAVE THE PEACE OF MIND FOR THEIR SAFETY AS THEY EXPLORE AND ENJOY MAKING NEW MEMORIES.

THAT IS IN SUPPORT. THAT IS FROM LAURIE AND RANDALL.

IS THERE ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OR OPPOSITION TO THE MATTER? I SEE ONE MORE HAND RAISED.

YES, SIR, WOULD YOU LIKE TO APPROACH AND STATE YOUR NAME AND

YOUR ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. >> PUBLIC SPEAKER: I'M BRYSON SWIGGET 4755 KYLE AVENUE, FORT WORTH.

I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY. ALONG WITH MY FRIEND JORDAN.

WE WENT IN TO THIS PROPERTY NEVER -- AGAIN, MY APOLOGIES TO

[00:35:03]

MRS. BAKER AND THEIR LOSS AND ALL OF THAT.

BUT NEVER, I WANT TO SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT.

NEVER DID WE SAY WE WOULD BUILD A HOUSE IN THE BACK FOR MY DAUGHTER. I'M ONLY 30 YEARS OLD.

I DO NOT HAVE A DAUGHTER THAT I WOULD BE BUILDING A HOUSE FOR OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. WE HEARD Y'ALL LAST TIME.

WE WERE GOING FOR THE STRAIGHT ZONING.

JUST AGAIN FRANKLY IT WOULD BE EASIER ON US.

HOWEVER, WE FEEL LIKE IN THE COUNTRY MODULE, WE ARE DOING EXACTLY WHAT Y'ALL HAVE SLOTTED FOR THIS AREA.

AND I WANT TO GROW UP IN THE COUNTRY.

I HAVE A 3-MONTH-OLD SON THAT I WANT TO GROW UP IN THE COUNTRY.

RIDING BIKES AND GO-KARTS AROUND IN THE BACKYARD.

DOING ALL OF THAT FUN STUFF. I WANT TO BE ABLE TO GIVE THAT TO HIM. SO, THIS PRESENTED ITSELF AS AN OPPORTUNITY TO DO THAT. I LOVE THE APPLE LANE ROAD WITH THE DEAD END. PRIVACY OF IT.

THINK IT'S AWESOME. WE WANT TO ENHANCE THE AREA.

IN WAY -- AGAIN, I'M SORRY FOR EVERYBODY TO BE HERE AND DEAL WITH THIS. I KNOW IT'S A PAIN.

I TRULY AM SORRY FOR THAT. BUT AGAIN, WE HEARD YOU LAST TIME. WE WORKED WITH MARCOS AND P&Z AND WE ASKED QUESTIONS TO MAKE IT BETTER.

IS IT PERFECT? ABSOLUTELY NOT.

BUT WE FEEL LIKE IT DOES FIT WITH WHERE WE NEED TO BE TO MEET ALL THE STANDARDS OF WHAT THE CITY REQUIRES.

BEING SO CLOSE TO THE CITY. I FEEL LIKE THIS FITS IN WELL.

IN REGARD TO SEPTIC, SEPTIC IS ON AN ACRE ALL THE TIME.

THAT IS NOT AN ISSUE. WE HAVE SPOKE WITH THE MOUNTAIN PEAK WATER AND WE HAVE HAD THE HYDRAULIC TEST.

WATER IS NOT AN ISSUE. SO, YEAH.

THAT IS WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO SAY.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: THANK YOU.

IF YOU WILL MAKE SURE YOU FILL OUT A FORM IF YOU HAVEN'T

ALREADY. >> YES, SIR.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: THANK YOU. ANYBODY ELSE WHO WANTS TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OR OPPOSITION? ONE MORE PERSON.

AS MANY AS WANT TO SPEAK AS CAN BUT ONE MORE INDICATING HE WANTS

TO SPEAK. >> PUBLIC SPEAKER: I'M JOHN SHANNON. 111 APPLE LANE.

MY WIFE AND I, TWO BOYS LIVE THERE.

MENTION THE WATER. IT IS A PROBLEM.

THE FARTHER YOU GET DOWN THE WORSE THE PRESSURE IS.

WE CAN'T HAVE TWO THINGS RUNNING IN OUR HOUSE AT THE SAME TIME.

THE WATER JUST FALLS OUT AT THAT POINT IN THE FAUCET.

THAT IS ONE OF OUR MAIN CONCERNS IS THE PRESSURE, ADDING ADDITIONAL HOUSES WOULD REDUCE THE PRESSURE WE ARE ALREADY STRUGGLING. WE HAD TO HAVE THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM ENGINEERED SPECIFICALLY FOR LOW PRESSURE BECAUSE OF

THAT. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: OKAY.

THANK YOU, MR. SHANNON. IF YOU WILL FILL OUT A FORM.

>> I HAVE A QUESTION. SHOW US WHERE YOU ARE AT UP

THERE. >> 14.9 ACRES.

RIGHT THERE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: YOU UNDERSTAND THAT BASICALLY IF WE WERE TO APPROVE THIS, THIS BREAKUP, THAT WOULD DEFINITELY AFFECT YOUR ABILITY TO SELL YOUR PROPERTY AND TRY TO SUBDIVIDE IT?

>> YES, SIR. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: THANK YOU.

IS THERE ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? SEEING NONE, DO I HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING?

>> SO MOVED. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING BY COMMISSIONER OSBORN.

SECOND? >> MEMBER ALTMAN: SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BATEMAN. WE'LL CALL THE VOTE.

I VOTE AYE. COMMISSIONER KOEHLER?

>> MEMBER KOEHLER: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER

HILL? >> MEMBER HILL: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER OSBORN?

>> AYE. >> COMMISSIONER BATEMAN?

>> AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER

STEPHENS? >> MEMBER STEPHENS: NO.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: OKAY. THE MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING CARRIES 6-1. THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED.

WE CAN HAVE A DISCUSSION, MOTIONS.

>> I HAVE QUESTIONS OF STAFF. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: OKAY.

YOU CAN ASK THOSE. >> MARCOS, DO WE KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THE WATER LINE OUT THERE? THE SIZE OF IT? ALL OF THAT? I KNOW IT'S NOT OURS BUT DO WE

HAVE INFORMATION ON THAT? >> MARCOS: YEAH.

WELL OUR RECORDS INDICATE AND AGAIN WE GET OUR RECORDS FROM MOUNTAIN PEAK. OUR RECORD INDICATE THERE IS A FOUR-INCH WATER LINE THAT RUNS, IT RUNS ON THE SOUTHERN SIDE.

ULTIMATELY FEEDING OR SERVING THE LOTS BACK HERE.

OTHER THAN THAT WE ARE REACHED OUT TO MOUNTAIN PEAK TO GET THEIR TAKE ON THE SUBDIVISION AND HOW IT MAY AFFECT THEIR LINE. I HAVE NOT HEARD BACK FROM MR. CURT YET. THAT IS ABOUT THE MOST

INFORMATION WE HAVE ON THAT. >> SO WE REALLY DON'T KNOW IF FOUR ADDITIONAL HOMES WERE BUILT HERE HOW IT WILL IMPACT?

>> MARCOS: I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT TALKED TO MOUNTAIN PEAK. ACCORDING TO WHAT HE HAS SAID APPARENTLY IT'S GOOD. WE HAVE NOT CONFIRMED THAT WITH MOUNTAIN PEAK. BUT THAT IS ONLY BECAUSE WE DON'T SERVE WATER IN THAT AREA. IT ULTIMATELY IS MOUNTAIN PEAK'S

[00:40:03]

CALL TO MAKE. >> OKAY.

THEY CAN ADEQUATELY PUT AN ARROW ANAEROBIC SYSTEM OR SEWER SYSTEM

ON AN ACRE WITHOUT A PROBLEM? >> MARCOS: THAT IS THE TYPICAL. AS LONG AS YOU VAN ACRE OR MORE.

>> SINCE WE JUST RESURFACED THAT ROAD I ASSUME THERE IS NOT ANY IMMEDIATE OR NEAR FUTURE PLANS TO IMPROVE THAT ROAD FROM WHAT IS RECENTLY BEEN DONE TO IT? IT'S PROBABLY GOING TO BE IN

THAT STATE FOR A WHILE, RIGHT? >> MARCOS: YES, SIR.

THAT IS CORRECT. >> OKAY.

MY LAST QUESTION, JUST FOR MY OWN EDIFICATION BECAUSE I GET CONFUSED SOMETIMES WITH APPLE AND BLUEBONNET.

THE DAY CARE CENTER THAT WAS APPROVED THERE ON 663, WAS THAT AT APPLE LANE OR WAS THAT AT BLUEBONNET?

>> MARCOS: BLUEBONNET. >> THANK YOU.

>> MARCOS: YES, SIR. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? COMMENTS? DEBATE? IS THERE ANY BUSINESS? ALL PRIVATE RESIDENCE OR ANY BUSINESSES ON APPLE LANE?

>> MARCOS: YOU KNOW, MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT IT IS ALL RESIDENCE BACK THERE. LET ME SEE IF I CAN FIND A BETTER -- I KNOW APPLE LANE JOGS TO THE RIGHT AND IT HEADS OVER TO 663. I BELIEVE THERE IS A -- IS THIS WHERE THEY SELL PACKAGED MEAT? I BELIEVE THERE IS ONE PACKAGED MEAT AREA WHERE THEY SERVE -- THEY HAVE BEEN THERE --

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: MR. SHORT MAY OFFER INFORMATION.

>> 751 APPLE LANE. IT'S THE MILL CREEK MEAT COMPANY. TRAFFIC COMES UP AND IT'S NOT GIGANTIC TRAFFIC BUT WE DO HAVE A MEAT COMPANY.

>> WHERE IS THAT ON THE MAP? FOR MY --

>> WHERE MY POINTER IS. THIS HIGH UP.

WHERE IT CURBS THIS WAY. >> SO THAT IS THE FIRST DEAD END

OFF OF 663. >> MARCOS: YES, SIR.

YES, SIR. >> OKAY.

>> DO WE HAVE ANY IDEA HOW OLD THAT FOUR-INCH MAIN IS?

>> MARCOS: I DO NOT HAVE THAT INFORMATION, SIR.

>> MR. KOEHLER, YOU BEING AN ENGINEER, IF THEY WERE TO HAVE THAT FOUR-INCH LINE REPLACED WITH A SIX-INCH LINE, WOULD THE WATER GO STALE WITH AS FEW PEOPLE OUT THERE?

>> MEMBER KOEHLER: I'D HAVE TO SEE THE WHOLE LINE.

I'M ASSUMING IT'S A DEAD END AND IT DOESN'T LOOP.

I COULD BE A PROBLEM. >> THANK YOU, SIR.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? LET ME, I'LL STATE WHERE I AM AT ON THIS.

YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY WE APPROVED ONE-ACRE LOTS AND IN THESE MODULES BEFORE. THEY HAVE COME IN AS PART OF THE ENTIRE PLOTS AND PLATS. WING THING WE HAVEN'T HAD IS THE NEIGHBORS SPEAKING OUT IN THE OPPOSITION TO IT.

HAVING SAT ON COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING BOARD WE PUT THE LINES ON THE MAP AND I SAID IT BEFORE. SOMETIMES NOT EVERYBODY IN THIS GROUP WAS PART OF THAT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

THEY DIDN'T GET A CHANCE TO VOICE THAT.

THOSE HAVE TO, WE HAVE TO ANSWER TO THE NEIGHBORHOODS AND WHAT THEY ARE LOOKING FOR. ONE OF THE KEY COMPONENTS OF MIDLOTHIAN HAS ALWAYS BEEN PRESERVING A RURAL HERITAGE IN THE CITY. AND I THINK IT'S GOOD WE HAVE THE GROUPS OF NEIGHBORS THAT COME FORWARD AND MAKE THESE KIND OF ARGUMENTS TO PRESERVE RURAL HERITAGE AND TO ARGUE THAT THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD SHOULD BE A RANCHETTE NEIGHBORHOOD.

FRANKLY WE JUST APPROVED IN THE LAST THREE OR FOUR MONTHS SEVERAL LARGE ONE-ACRE DEVELOPMENTS.

THERE IS PLENTY OF ONE-ACRE LOT AVAILABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT.

THESE, ONE OF THOSE I BELIEVE HAD CURBS AND LIGHTS AND SIDEWALKS. THERE ARE AMENITIES WITH THE LOTS. .WE DON'T SEE IT HERE.

THIS IS BURDENING THE ROADS AND THE WATER SYSTEM THERE THAT WASN'T DESIGNED TO SUPPORT ONE-ACRE NEIGHBORHOOD.

IF WE APPROVE THIS IT WILL LEAD TO THE IDEA OF THE SMALLER LOTS BEING INSERTED IN THOSE LOTS. I KNOW ONE OF THE GENTLEMEN WITH A 14-ACRE SAID HE WASN'T GOING TO DEVELOP IT.

MAYBE HIS KIDS WILL BE HERE IN A FEW YEARS SAYING WE TOOK CARE OF DAD. NOW WE WILL DEVELOP THAT.

DAD MOVED TO FLORIDA. THAT IS OUR JOB TO SAFEGUARD THIS. SO FOR THAT REASON, LOOKING AT THIS, I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT THAT WE HONOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

KEEPING WITH THE CONSISTENCY. I'M IN FAVOR OF DENYING THE

REQUEST. >> I WOULD MAKE THAT MOTION.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: OKAY. MOTION IS MADE.

I'LL SECOND THE MOTION. TO DENY THE APPLICATION.

THE MOTION IS NOW BEFORE US. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION,

COMMENTS BY ANYONE? >> I HAVE A COMMENT.

[00:45:01]

I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE SIZE OF THE LOTS.

HE HAS DONE WHAT WE ASKED HIM TO DO.

BUT MY CONCERN WAS I WAS OVER THERE TODAY PULLING OUT ON 663, THE ADDED CONGESTION IS GOING TO MAKE IT WORSE.

IT'S DANGEROUS THERE. SO, I'M GOING TO AGREE WITH

Y'ALL ON YOUR MOTION. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: OKAY.

I'LL CALL THE VOTE. I'LL VOTE -- THIS IS THE MOTION

TO DENY. >> I DISAGREE WITH YOU.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: OKAY. >> THE METROPLEX IS THE FOURTH LARGEST IN THE NATION NOW. BACK WHEN I WAS A KID, DALLAS WAS THE 37TH LARGEST CITY. PEOPLE LIKE THIS AREA.

AND THEY ARE MOVING IN. THE INDIANS DIDN'T WANT US TO COME. WE CAME.

THE FARMERS DIDN'T WANT US IN. WE CAME.

DENSITY IS GOING TO OCCUR. THESE ARE ONLY FOUR LOTS.

WE HAVE A WHOLE LOT MORE THAN FOUR PEOPLE HERE TO DECIDE TO DISTANCE THE PLACE THEY WANTED TO LIVE.

I CAN'T BLAME THEM. WHAT A GREAT AREA.

BUT WE'RE GOING TO DOUBLE THE POPULATION OF THIS TOWN.

WE'LL DO IT PRETTY SOON IF THE ECONOMY HOLDS.

IF YOU DON'T WANT MORE PEOPLE IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD, DON'T SELL.

BUT WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD YOU TELL THE GENTLEMAN THAT OWNS THIS PROPERTY THAT YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO RESTRICT HIM FROM DEVELOPING IN SUCH A WAY AS TO BRING A COUPLE OF NEIGHBORS IN ALONG WITH HIM? I DON'T THINK YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO THAT. SO I WILL OPPOSE YOUR MOTION,

SIR. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: THANK YOU, MR. BATEMAN. I WILL NOW CALL THE VOTE UNLESS THERE ARE OTHER COMMENTS. HEARING NONE I WILL VOTE -- THIS IS MOTION FOR DENIAL. I VOTE AYE.

KOEHLER? >> MEMBER KOEHLER: AYE.

>> HILL? >> MEMBER HILL: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER OSBORN?

>> MEMBER OSBORN: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER

BATEMAN? >> MEMBER BATEMAN: NAY.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER STEPHENS?

>> MEMBER STEPHENS: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: THE MOTION TO DENY THE APPLICANT CARRIES 6-1.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE HAVE A MOTION FROM -- 5-1.

EXCUSE ME. OH, YOU ARE RIGHT.

SORRY. MY APOLOGIES, MR. DARRACH IS NOW A COUNCILMEMBER. WE ONE SHORT.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT.

[012 Conduct a public hearing to consider and act upon an ordinance amending the City of Midlothian zoning ordinance and zoning map relating to the use and development of property described as Lot 12R, Mission Hill, Phase One, and 3.542± acres situated in the John H. Jones Survey, Abstract No. 586, described in exhibit “A” hereto located at 2041 Mcalpin Road and in an Agricultural (A) District, by granting a Specific Use Permit (SUP) for an animal (canine) training facility and adopting development conditions (SUP04- 2021-06).]

WE'LL NOW MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 12.

LET ME FIND THAT SO I CAN READ IT.

12. OKAY.

YEAH, NUMBER 12. THAT IS THE ONE I HAVE THE MOST PUBLIC COMMENT ON. WE'LL CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE USE AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT LOT 12R, MISSION HILL, PHASE ONE, AND 3.5 ACRES. LOCATED AT 2041 MCALPIN ROAD IN AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT GRANTING SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR ANIMAL CANINE TRAINING FACILITY AND ADOPTING DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS. ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU. >> MARCOS: THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN. THIS IS ROUGHLY FIVE ACRES.

THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED OFF MCALPIN ROAD NEAR SWEETWATER DRIVE AND ZONED AGRICULTURAL. THE PROPOSED ANIMAL TRAINING USE WILL BE LIMITED TO SIX DOGS ONLY DURING A TRAINING SESSION.

APPLICATION STATED THAT THE TRAINING INVOLVES TEACHING SCENT DETECTION FOR COMPETITION AND FOR PROFESSIONAL PURPOSES.

WITH THE OWNERS PRESENT AT ALL TIME.

TRAINING WILL OCCUR AT THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY INDOORS AND OUTDOORS. BOTH AREAS ARE IDENTIFIED ON THE SCREEN AS THE OUTDOOR TRAINING AREA.

AND THE INDOOR TRAINING AREA. THE INDOOR TRAINING AREA WILL OCCUR INSIDE A METAL BUILDING. AN EXISTING METAL BUILDING THAT MEASURES 2,000 SQUARE FEET. THE STRUCTURE IS ALSO APPROXIMATELY 230 FEET FROM THE CLOSEST RESIDENTIAL HOME.

ONLY SIX ANIMALS WILL BE TRAINED AT ANY ONE TIME, THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF VEHICLES THAT WOULD BE VISITING THE PROPERTY WOULD BE SIX. SIX IMPROVED PARKING SPACES.

THE APPLICANT WILL BE ASKING FOR ASPHALT IMPROVEMENTS.

WILL BE PROVIDE AND LOCATED BEHIND THE FENCE.

THE ENTIRE PROPERTY, LET ME BACK UP HERE, THE ENTIRE PROPERTY COMPLETELY FENCED WITH A NON-OPAQUE FENCE.

MORE OF A PIPE HORSE TYPE OF FENCE.

BUT THERE IS AN EXISTING PRIVACY WOOD FENCE NEAR THE RESIDENTIAL HOME. YOU CAN SEE IT HERE.

IN THIS SLIDE. THE APPLICANT STATED TRAIN WILLING NOT OCCUR EVERY DAY. IT'S ONLY ON OCCASION.

THERE IS NO PROPOSED SIGNAGE. WE DID SEND OUT 19 LETTERS TO

[00:50:04]

PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET. TO DATE, THE STAFF RECEIVED NO LETTERS FROM THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS.

WE DID RECEIVE MULTIPLE LETTERS IN SUPPORT THAT DO FALL OUTSIDE OF THAT 200-FOOT BUFFER. GIVEN THE LOCATION IS ON FIVE ACRES, ANIMAL WOULD WILL LIMITED TO SIX.

AND THE DISTANCE OF THE TRAINING FROM EXISTING RESIDENTIAL HOMES WE DO FEEL THE IMPACT WILL BE MINIMAL.

THE STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL FOR THE PROPOSED S.U.P.

I CAN STAND FOR QUESTIONS. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU. IS THE APPLICANT HERE? WOULD THE APPLICANT LIKE TO PRESENT? YES, MA'AM. WOULD YOU COME FORWARD?

TELL US ABOUT YOUR APPLICATION. >> PUBLIC SPEAKER: YES.

THANK YOU FOR HEARING ME. I'M CAROLINE OLDHAM.

WE MOVED TO MIDLOTHIAN ALMOST A MONTH AGO FROM MANSFIELD.

WE MOVED HERE TO STRETCH OUR LEGS.

WE HAVE BEEN LOOKING FOR PROPERTY FOR 16 YEARS.

THIS WAS PERFECT. WE WERE ON THE PROPERTY TEN MINUTES AND WE KNEW IT WAS FOR US.

I HAVE BEEN TRAINING AND COMPETING WITH DOGS SINCE 2004.

COMPETITIVE OBEDIENCE AND IN SCENT WORK.

SCENT WORK, IF YOU DON'T KNOW MIMICS THE PROFESSIONAL CANINE PROFESSION. SO IF YOU LOOK AT DOGS IN GENERAL, YOU HAVE GOT PET DOGS, WHICH CAN BE ANYTHING FROM A LAP DOG TO A DOG CHAINED UP IN THE BACKYARD WITH NOTHING TO DO.

AND ALL THOSE IN BETWEEN. DOGS JUST HANG OUT WITH HUMANS.

TO THE PROFESSIONALS WHO CAN BE OWNED BY AGENCIES OR COMPANIES, OR INDIVIDUALS LIKE ME THAT DONOR COTTICS DETECTION, SEARCH AND RESCUE, EXPLOSIVE DETECTION, WORK AT AIRPORTS ALL OF THOSE THINGS, COOL THINGS WE SEE DOGS DO.

BUT THERE IS A HYBRID IN BETWEEN.

THAT IS WHAT I OWN. THAT IS WHAT I TEACH.

THAT HYBRID IS A QUASI PROFESSIONAL.

AND WE USE THE SAME TECHNIQUES THAT THE PROFESSIONALS USE TO IMPRINT DOGS ON CIVILIAN ODOR. THOSE ARE ESSENTIAL OILS.

I ALSO WORK WITH DAVID BULL WHO IS OUR ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF.

I TRAIN HIS ACCELERANT DOG. HIS UP AND COMING ACCELERANT DOG. SO I USE METHODS THAT THE PROFESSIONALS USE TO TEACH PET DOGS, OR QUASI PROFESSIONALS.

AND I THINK I WOULD MAKE A GOOD ADDITION, ALONG WITH THE OTHER TRAINERS THAT ARE IN MIDLOTHIAN TO THE AREA TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE WELL-BEING NOT ONLY OF DOGS, BECAUSE I KNOW AND YOU MAY KNOW THAT THE HAPPIEST AND THE LEAST DESTRUCTIVE DOGS ARE THE DOGS WITH JOBS. WE WEAR OUR DOGS OUT ON A DAILY BASIS. THEY DON'T DIG OUT.

THEY DON'T RUN AWAY. THEY DON'T TEAR UP.

AND THEY DON'T OVERBARK. OR CAUSE A COMMOTION BECAUSE THEY'RE EXHAUSTED. WE LOVE THAT.

THIS HAS BEEN MY PASSION. ONCE MY KIDS LEFT HOME.

I HAVE A CHILD IN THE AIR FORCE. AND TWO OTHER GIRLS.

I WAS ABLE TO POUR MYSELF IN TO THIS FULL-TIME.

AND I KNOW I WAS MADE FOR THIS. I HAVE A WAIT LIST A MILE LONG OF PEOPLE TRYING TO GET IN TO MY CLASSES.

NOT ALL OF MY TEACHING HAPPENS AT THE RESIDENCE OR WOULD HAPPEN AT THE RESIDENCE OF THE TO DO THIS JOB EFFECTIVELY EXPOSURE IS THE NAME OF THE GAME. SO WE GO TO HOME DEPOT.

WE GO TO TRACTOR SUPPLY. WE GO TO STORAGE UNITS.

WE GO ALL OVER THE PLACE. BECAUSE THE DOG HAS GOT TO BE ABLE TO PERFORM THE JOB ANYWHERE.

UNDER ANY KIND OF DISTRACTION. KIDS PLAYING, PEOPLE TALKING, VISUAL DISTRACTIONS, AUDIBLE DISTRACTIONS.

THAT KIND OF THING. SO WHAT WOULD HAPPEN AT ANY PROPERTY IS THE BEGINNING OF ALL OF THAT.

THEN THOSE PEOPLE ARE TRAINED OFF THE PROPERTY.

BUT, YOU DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT NOISE.

THIS IS A QUIET SPORT. IT'S NOT LIKE JUMPING OFF A DOCK. OR RUNNING TO CHASE PLASTIC BAG OR ANY OF THE OTHER DOG SPORTS WHERE THERE IS A LOT OF HIGH-ENERGY BARKING. THIS IS A QUIET SPORT.

WHERE THEY GO AROUND AND THEY SNIFF.

AND THEN THEY LET THE HANDLER KNOW WHAT THEY FOUND BY A SCENT OR SOME KIND OF AN ALERT THAT IS NOT BARKING.

AS FAR AS MESS GOES, IT'S CUSTOMARY FOR OUR SPORT.

WE PICK UP POOP IN A POOP BAG. WE DISPOSE IT IN A SEALED CONTAINER. SO THIS IS MY HOME.

I PLAN ON TREATING IT THAT WAY. IT WON'T SMELL.

[00:55:02]

I'LL RESPECT MY NEIGHBORS. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR

ME? >> MEMBER ALTMAN: ANY

QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? >> I HAVE A QUICK QUESTION.

SO THIS WOULD BE LIKE A DAILY THING?

>> NOT DAILY. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: NOT BOARDING

OR WEEK LONG? >> IT'S NOT BOARDING.

I'M NOT INTE INTERESTED IN THATT ALL.

MAINLY BECAUSE OF MY OWN SCHEDULE OF COMPETITION.

I'M GONE MOST WEEKENDS. COMPETING IN DIFFERENT STATES AND DIFFERENT CITIES. I WAS JUST IN, I JUST WENT TO THTHE CANINE OLYMPICS OVER THE WEEKEND.

I HAVE NO IDEA TO BOARD THE DOG. >> THEY GIVE THE DOG TO YOU?

>> A LOT OF THE SESSION ARE ONE-ON-ONE.

PEOPLE PAY A LOT OF MONEY FOR PRIVATES.

THAT IS WHAT THEY WANT. THEY WANT MY ATTENTION ONE-ON-1.

SO THE MOST I CAN EVER HANDLE IN AN HOUR IS SIX TEAMS. A TEAM BEING A CANINE CANDLEER AND A CANINE -- HANDLER AND A CANINE. I LOVE ONE-ON-ONE SESSION BECAUSE THAT IS WHERE MOST WORK GETS DONE.

MOST TIME YOU SEE ONE CAR BEHIND MY FENCE.

SOMETIMES YOU WILL SEE UP TO SIX CARS BEHIND MY FENCE.

>> OKAY. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU, MA'AM. >> ONE THING WE WOULD LIKE TO ADD. I DREW A MAP.

MARCOS TALKED ABOUT ASPHALT. WANT ME TO BRING IT TO YOU?

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: SURE. PASS IT AROUND.

>> SO HERE IS WHAT I WANT TO TALK ABOUT.

THIS IS THE HOUSE. THIS IS THE BARN.

THIS IS EXISTING CONCRETE. WE'D LIKE TO GO ASPHALT HERE.

ASPHALT HERE. FOR PARKING SPACES.

WE WANT TO ASK FOR A HIGHER END GRAVEL HERE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: SO YOU ARE HAVING FOR A VARIANCE TO ALLOW

FOR GRAVEL? >> YES, SIR.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: TAKE A LOOK AT THAT TO SEE IF THE VARIANCE IF WE WANT TO APPROVE THAT. THANK YOU.

WHILE EVERYONE IS LOOKING AT THAT.

THANK YOU. >> PUBLIC SPEAKER: THANK YOU.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: I'LL CALL THE OTHER FOLKS UP.

WE HAVE A NUMBER OF THE LETTERS. LET ME -- WE'LL GO AHEAD AND DO SPEAKERS FIRST. THEN WE CAN -- GERALYN CALDWELL.

JUST COME UP AND STATE YOUR ADDRESS AND YOUR NAME.

>> PUBLIC SPEAKER: OKAY. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: RI REGISTERED

IN SUPPORT. >> PUBLIC SPEAKER: HI.

I'M GERALYN. I USED TO RESIDE AT MCALPIN ROAD, I HAD COWS AND GOATS AND CHICKENS AND RABBITS AND DUCKS AND ANY OTHER ANIMAL YOU CAN THINK OF, I HAD IT THERE.

I NEVER HAD A PROBLEM WITH ANYBODY SAYING THAT THERE WAS ANY KIND OF SMELL OR ANY OF THAT.

AS LONG AS WE TOOK CARE OF EVERYTHING AND WE PUT IT AWAY AND EVERYBODY I HAD A MANURE PILE.

SO I HAVE BEEN THERE 16 YEARS. I JUST MOVED OUT LAST MONTH AND NOW I'M AT MOUNT ZION. I WOULD FIGURE SOMETHING LIKE THIS, ESPECIALLY THAT IT IS BENEFITING FOR WHAT SHE IS TRYING TO PRODUCE HERE. SHE IS DOING A NICE THING FOR THE COMMUNITY. ANYWAY, THANK YOU.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, GERALYN.

THE NEXT PERSON SIGNED UP FOR JOHN TABBACK?

WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK? >> PUBLIC SPEAKER: YES.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: OKAY. >> PUBLIC SPEAKER: JOHN TABBACK, 2211 MCALPIN. I'M THAT ONE TO THE -- WHAT IS THAT? RIGHT THERE.

RIGHT HERE. IN THE PAST, THE RESIDENTS WE TALKED ABOUT PRIOR TO HER PURCHASE THERE WERE NUMEROUS CATTLE ON THERE. TO THE POINT WHERE THERE IS OFFENSE THAT GOES DOWN. MY PROPERTY MAKES AN "L" THERE AND THEN GOES BACK. THEY WERE PRETTY DESTRUCTIVE.

BUT IN RELATIONSHIP TO WHAT SHE IS TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH, I DON'T THINK THAT ANYTHING THAT SHE IS TRYING TO DO WOULD HAVE ANY IMPACT ON ANYBODY THAT LIVES ON EITHER SIDE OF HER OR FOUR OR FIVE HOUSES DOWN ON EITHER SIDE. IF THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN A PROBLEM IT WOULD HAVE BEEN THE GENTLEMAN THAT HAD THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO HER. WHO HAD NUMEROUS CATTLE ON

[01:00:02]

THERE. I THINK HE EXCEEDED THE LIMIT HE WAS ALLOWED TO HAVE. IT DIDN'T PRESENT A PROBLEM WITH ME. WE HAVE SINCE RECTIFIED THE PROBLEM. ONE BY HIM LEAVING.

TWO, BY THEM REPAIRING THE FENCE.

THE THING THAT I WOULD LIKE TO SAY IS WHAT SHE IS TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH RIGHT HERE CAN IMPACT EACH OF YOUR LIVES.

WHAT I MEAN BY THAT. I WORKED FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR 35 YEARS. URBAN SEARCH AND RESCUE.

WHEN YOU BRING A DOG IN WHO IS QUALIFIED TO SEARCH, IT COULD BE YOUR SON, YOUR DAUGHTER, RELATIVE, SEARCHING THROUGH THE RUBBLE TO TRY TO FIND YOUR LOVED ONE.

THAT IS BASICALLY WHAT SHE HAS GOT IN HER BAG OF TRICKS.

SHE CAN PRETTY MUCH DO IT ALL. I HAVE OLOG A DOG THAT IS COMPETITIVE. SHE REFERENCED DOGS THAT ARE DOCK DIVERS. MY DOCK IS.

HE IS DIVES OFF THE -- SHE DRIVES OFF THE DOCK.

11TH RECOGNIZED DOG IN THE NATION.

WE TAKE PRIDE IN OUR DOGS. WE SPEND A LOT OF TIME WITH THEM. EVERYTHING SHE SAID ABOUT THEM TIRING THEM OUT, BELIEVE ME MY DOG WANT THE NATIONALS IN HOUSTON. SHE WON 60.5 YARDS ON THE FLY.

AND CAUGHT IT. AT THE THE END OF THE DAY SHE WAS DONE. SHE WANTED TO SLEEP.

THAT IS ALL SHE WANTED TO DO. GENTLEMEN, I'M SAYING WHAT SHE IS TRYING TO DO WILL BEEN IF IT EVERYBODY.

NOT JUST HERSELF FROM A FINANCIAL ASPECT BUT WHAT SHE IS

DOING IS THE RIGHT THING. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: THANK YOU, APPRECIATE IT. NICOLE LATERIO.

DID YOU WANT TO SPEAK? OKAY.

YES. >> PUBLIC SPEAKER: I'M NICOLE.

I LIVE AT 1771 WINSLET DRIVE. I MOVED HERE IN 2016 FROM CHICAGO. SO BIG CHANGE.

12TH FLOOR, 28, TO ACRE AND A HALF.

I MOVED HERE, NO FAMILY AND NO FRIENDS.

I LOOKED IN THE COMMUNITY WHERE CAN I CONNECT? I WAS BLESSED TO FIND CAROLYN. I GOT MY DOG WITH THE HOUSE.

DOBERMAN. A BREED I NEVER WANTED.

AND A SHEPHERD MIX, ANOTHER BREED I NEVER WANTED.

I HAD TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO WORK WITH THE DOG.

I'M BLESSED WITH THE MIND OF A DOG THAT IS VERY METHODICAL IN HER WORK. SHE MORE OF A BASEBALL THINK OF IT IF YOU THINK OF HIT THE WAY IN THE WAY SHE ATTACKS LIFE.

I CAN SAY THAT THE SPORT THAT CAROLYN IS TRYING TO PROPOSE TO YOU IS SIMILAR TO THAT OF YOU GOING GOLFING.

AFTER A LONG DAY AT WORK, YOU NEED TO UNWIND AND FIGURE OUT AND DO SOMETHING ENJOYABLE. THAT IS WHAT THIS IS.

MY HUSBAND HAS NEVER TAKEN INTEREST IN OUR DOGS BEFORE.

IT'S BEEN MY RESPONSIBILITY. LIKE OUR FUR CHILD OR WHATEVER.

BUT HE WILL TAKE OUR DOG NOW AND SAY YOU KNOW WHAT? I'M TRYING TO WATCH FOOTBALL. GO GET THAT SCENT BOX THING.

HE WILL HIDE IT FOR ME AND I WILL GO FURTHER AND BURN MY DOG'S ENERGY OUT. IT BRINGS THE FAMILY TOGETHER.

IT DOESN'T JUST BRING THE DOG HANDLER AND THE DOG TOGETHER.

IT BRINGS A FAMILY TOGETHER. ALSO AS WE SAID IT WEARS THE DOG OUT. EVERY TIME THAT I HAVE BEEN WITH CAROLYN SHE IS VERY, VERY AWARE OF DETAILS OF KEEPING EVERYTHING TIDY AND CLEAN. THE DOGS ARE SO TIRED OUT WHEN THEY WORK TOGETHER. THEY SHIP UP AND WATCH EACH OTHER. THEY WANT TO FIGURE OUT WHERE THE PRIZE IS AT. THEY WILL USE EACH OTHER'S HINTS AND TAKE IT OUT WHEN THEY GO IN THE FIELD TO LOOK.

IT'S CONCERNS OF THE NOISE, I WOULD NOT BE WORRIED ABOUT THAT.

YOU ARE WORKING ABOUT THE GOLFING DOGS.

THE NAME OF THE GAME IS SHUT UP AND TAKE SOME CUES, RIGHT? THAT IS WHAT THE DOGS ARE LIKE. IT'S AN EXCELLENT SPORT.

A GREAT VALUE TO THE COMMUNITY FOR SEARCH AND RESCUE IF WE ARE ABLE TO DO THAT. FOR THOSE WHO JUST HAVE A PET THEY WORK WITH, IT'S A BLESSING TO CONNECT TO THE COMMUNITY.

MIDLOTHIAN WANTS TO SAY MORE OF THE AGRICULTURAL COMMUNITY.

THIS IS SOMETHING THAT PEOPLE CAN STILL DO BEING OUTSIDE AND

STILL CONNECT TOGETHER. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: THANK YOU

VERY MUCH. >> PUBLIC SPEAKER: THANK YOU.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: I'M GOING TO BRIEFLY SUM MAR THE LETTERS AND READ -- SUMMARIZE THE LETTERS. GILBERT GARCIA REGISTERED IN OPPOSITION. BUT THEN CONTACTED THE CITY AND ASKED THAT IT BE REDACTED. WE HAVE LETTER FROM A FORMER PERSON MEGAN CHILDERS AT NAP SISTER SELF-STORAGE AT 100 NEW PATTERSON ROAD IN MANSFIELD, TEXAS, WHO SAID THAT MS. OLDHAM FORMERLY USED HER PROPERTY AND DID A WONDERFUL JOB.

THERE WERE NO MESSES OR BARKING. SIMILAR LETTER FROM VICTORIA SEVERENS 2613 SYLAN GLEN IN BURLESON, TEXAS, WHO ALSO USED

[01:05:07]

THE PROPERTY FOR CAROLYN CLASSES AND SPOKE HIGHLY OF HER.

THEN WE HAVE A RICHARD BURT AT TRINITY BANK.

THE CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER WHO HAD HIS DOGS TRAINED THERE AND SPEAKS HIGHLY. VICTOR BORAJ OF THE TACTICAL CANINE INVESTIGATION. AND KAREN A. SHIVERS, TEXAS CANINE TRAINING ACADEMY TO RECOGNIZE THEY WILL BE GOOD NEIGHBORS. AND CARROLL FORD HAD A DOG THERE ALSO TRAINED. AND SPEAKS POSITIVELY.

SO THOSE ARE ALL IN SUPPORT OF THIS.

THEY WILL BE PART OF THE RECORD. IF ANYONE WANTS TO READ THOSE IN FULL. I WILL ASK IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WANTS TO SPEAK? WOULD YOU LIKE TO APPROACH?

HAVE YOU FILLED OUT A FORM? >> PUBLIC SPEAKER: NOT YET.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: AFTER YOU ARE DONE IF YOU WILL FILL OUT A FORM, THAT WOULD BE GREAT. THANK YOU.

>> PUBLIC SPEAKER: I'M PATTY NELSON.

I RESIDE 3630 LEARIN IN MIDLOTHIAN.

I HAVE KNOWN CAROLYN FOR A YEAR. I'M ONE OF HER STUDENTS.

I JUST WANT TO APPROACH AS A LONG-TIME TRAINER OF DOGS.

SINCE 1972. I HAVE BEEN AN INSTRUCTOR MYSELF SINCE 1979. SO, I'M FAMILIAR WITH INSTRUCTING AS WELL AS BEING A STUDENT.

I WILL SAY THAT SHE HAS ONE OF THE MOST THOROUGH INSTRUCTORS THAT I HAVE EVER KNOWN. SHE IS VERY THOROUGH.

SHE IS VERY CLEAN. SHE IS VERY STRICT.

SHE IS VERY CONSCIENTIOUS. SHE WILL MAKE SURE THAT EVERYTHING IS DONE CORRECTLY AT HER HOME.

JUST AS SHE HAS AT EVERY FACILITY WE HAVE BEEN AT.

I HAVE BEEN WITH HER FOR A YEAR NOW.

I HAVE NO DOUBT THAT EVERYTHING WILL BE DONE CORRECTLY AT HER HOME WITH THE DOGS THAT AND THE HANDLERS THAT SHE HAS AT HER HOMESITE. SO I HAVE NO DOUBTS THAT Y'ALL WILL BE VERY HAPPY WITH HER. AND THAT SHE WILL BE A GREAT CONTRIBUTION TO MIDLOTHIAN, TO THE CITIZENS HERE.

AND TO THE DOGS. AND THE PEOPLE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: OKAY. >> PUBLIC SPEAKER: THANK YOU.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MA'AM.

ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK THAT HAS NOT BEEN RECOGNIZED? I SEE ONE MORE HAND.

HAVE YOU FILLED OUT A FORM? >> PUBLIC SPEAKER: I HAVEN'T.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: MA'AM, GRAB THE FORM BEFORE YOU LEAVE AND FILL IT OUT. IN THE BACK THERE.

>> PUBLIC SPEAKER: I WASN'T PREPARED TO SPEAK.

CAROLINE IS A FRIEND OF MY DAUGHTERS.

SHE IS 17 YEARS OLD. SHE HAS GOTTEN IN TO THIS DOG TRAINING OF ALL DIFFERENT KINDS. SHE SHOWS DOGS, TRAINS DOGS AND IT'S HER PASSION. I THINK FOR ME, IF I LIVE AROUND HERE WHAT WOULD BE MY CONCERNS IS THE TRAFFIC AND WHAT AM I GOING TO DEAL WITH AS A NEIGHBOR? THE LAST PROBABLY SIX OR SERVE YEARS THAT MY DAUGHTER HAS BEEN IN THIS SPORT, I HAVE TAKEN HER TO AT LEAST TWO OR THREE OTHER LOCATIONS IN THE CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN.

AT RESIDENCE WITH A METAL BUILDING IN THE BACK.

I CAN TELL YOU, IT'S QUIET, CALM, THERE IS NO PROBLEMS. I PULLED UP AND DROPPED HER OFF, LEFT HER FOR AN HOUR AND COME BACK TO PICK HER UP. SOMETIMES I'VE EVERYONE SAT OUT IN THE CAR. I'M NOT A DOG PERSON.

I DON'T KNOW WHERE SHE GETS IT. BUT SHE LOVES IT.

FOR ME, WHAT SHE IS WANTING TO DO AT THIS PLACE WOULD NEVER BE A PROBLEM. I WOULD LIVE NEXT DOOR AND I WOULD HAVEN'T A PROBLEM WITH IT AT ALL.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: DID YOU TELL US YOUR NAME?

>> PUBLIC SPEAKER: TERRY MOORE, 1370 SUMMERBROOK LANE MIDLOTHIAN. OTHER SIDE OF 287.

IF SHE MOVED NEXT DOOR TO ME, I WOULD WELCOME IT.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: THAT IS FINE.

IF YOU FILL OUT A CITIZEN PARTICIPATION FORM BEFORE YOU GO, THAT WOULD BE OUTSTANDING. ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? ALL RIGHT.

SEEING NONE I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.

SECOND? >> TEXAS.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BATEMAN.

CALL THE ROLL. ALTMAN, AYE.

COMMISSIONER KOEHLER? >> MEMBER KOEHLER: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER HILL?

>> MEMBER HILL: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER

OSBORN? >> MEMBER OSBORN: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER BATEMAN?

>> MEMBER BATEMAN: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER

STEPHENS? >> MEMBER STEPHENS: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: IT'S CLOSED BY 6-0.

ANY DISCUSSION, MOTION, COMMENTS?

>> YES. AS A PROUD MEMBER OF THE MIDLOTHIAN LIONS CLUB, I'D LIKE TO THANK YOU FOR MUCH FOR WHAT YOU DO. LIONS CLUB ASSISTS WITH SEEING EYE DOGS. WE HAVE A TRAINING FACILITY CLOSE TO THE AIRPORT. I HAVE A BROTHER-IN-LAW THAT HAS 5% SIGHT IN ONE EYE. NONE IN THE OTHER.

IF IT WASN'T FOR THE DOGS, THAT MAN WOULD BE LOST.

I ASSURE YOU. I SUPPORT YOU.

I'M VERY PROUD TO HAVE YOU HERE IN OUR TOWN.

[01:10:05]

THANK YOU. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: ANY MOTIONS?

>> SO MADE TO APPROVE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE. COMMISSIONER BATEMAN, IS THAT GRANTING THE VARIANCE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AS PRESENTED IN THE

APPLICANT'S PLAN? >> YES.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: OKAY. MOTION TO APPROVE.

ALSO TO GRANT A VARIANCE TO THE SURFACE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DRIVEWAY TO THE BACK FACILITY. DO I HAVE A SECOND?

>> I'LL SECOND. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HILL. I WILL CALL IT TO VOTE.

UNLESS THERE IS FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE. ALTMAN VOTES AYE.

COMMISSIONER KOEHLER? >> MEMBER KOEHLER: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER HILL?

>> MEMBER HILL: AYE. COMMISSIONER OSBORN?

>> MEMBER OSBORN: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER

BATEMAN? >> MEMBER BATEMAN: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER STEPHENS?

>> MEMBER STEPHENS: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: CARRIES 6-0.

IT'S APPROVED. THANK YOU.

[005 Consider and act upon a request for a Preliminary Plat of Mockingbird Heights, being ± 33.45 acres out of the Granville Kirk Survey Abstract No. 604, described in Exhibit “A” hereto. The property is located on the south side of Mockingbird Lane, between Pheasant Drive and Abbey Court (approximately 3,000 feet west of Walnut Grove Road) (Case No. PP02-2021-09).]

ALL RIGHT. NOW WE'LL RETURN TO THE ORDINARY COURSE OF THE AGENDA. STARTING WITH AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 5. CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT OF MOCKINGBIRD HEIGHTS.

BEING 33.45 ACRES ON THE SOUTHSIDE OF MOCKINGBIRD LANE BETWEEN PHEASANT DRIVE AND ABBEY COURT.

>> TRENTON: THANK YOU. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR MOCKINGBIRD HEIGHTS. PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT CONSIST OF 33.45 ACRES. IT CONTAINS THE 97 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING LOTS. 11 COMMON AREA LOTS.

PROPERTY RECENTLY REZONED TO PLANNING DEVELOPING DISTRICT 234. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES.

MOCKINGBIRD LANE LOCATED TO THE NORTH, IT'S ON THIS PICTURE.

IT'S RIGHT HERE AT THE TOP. IT'S TO THE NORTH.

IT'S CONSIDERED A MINOR ARTERIAL THAT REQUIRES THE 90-FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY. ALL APPROPRIATE RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION HAS BEEN DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SUBDIVISION REGULATION AND P.D. REGULATIONS. STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL AS IT MEETS REQUIREMENT FOR THE PRELIMINARY PLAN.

I CAN ANSWER QUESTIONS. NO PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE, DOES THE APPLICANT HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD? THEY DON'T? NO? OKAY.

ANY MOTIONS? CONCERNS, DEBATE?

>> I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.

>> SECOND THAT. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: I HAVE A SECOND TO BY COMMISSIONER BATEMAN.

NO FURTHER DISCUSSION, CALL IT TO VOTE.

COMMISSIONER ALTMAN AYE. COMMISSIONER KOEHLER?

>> MEMBER KOEHLER: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER

HILL? >> MEMBER HILL: AYE.

>> COMMISSIONER OSBORN? >> MEMBER OSBORN: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER BATEMAN?

>> MEMBER BATEMAN: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER

STEPHENS? >> MEMBER STEPHENS: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: ALL RIGHT. THE APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY

PLAT APPROVED. >> THANK YOU.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: ALL RIGHT. NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA ITEM 6.

[006 Consider and act upon a request for a Preliminary Plat of Westside Preserve, being 506.6+/- acres out of the John Chamblee Survey, Abstract No. 192, MEP and PRR Survey, Abstract No. 761, Joseph Stewart Survey, Abstract No. 961, and the Cuadrilla Irrigation Company Survey, Abstract No(s). 262 and 1204. The property is generally located south of U.S. Highway 287 and +/- 1400 feet West of U.S. Highway 67 (Case No. PP01-2021-07).]

CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A REQUEST FOR THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WESTSIDE PRESERVE BEING 506.6 ACRES.

GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF THE U.S. HIGHWAY 287.

APPROXIMATELY 1400 FEET WEST OF THE U.S. HIGHWAY 67.

>> TRENTON: THANK YOU. THIS PIECE OF THE PROPERTY, PULL UP THE CONCEPT. I APOLOGIZE LOCATED DIRECTLY WEST OF THE U.S. HIGHWAY 67. IT WAS ZONED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 18. THE PROPERTY OWNER WISHING, THEY ARE REQUESTING A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE WESTSIDE PRESERVE.

APPROXIMATELY 506.6 ACRES. THIS CONTAINS 800 LOTS THAT CONSIST OF THE 787 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPING LOTS.

ALSO CONSISTENT FOR THE COMMUNITY RETAIL LOTS AND THE MIXED USE FAMILY AND COMMON AREA LOTS BEING 13 REMAINING LOTS.

THEY ARE REQUESTING THIS BE DONE IN A PHASED PROVISION.

THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. APPLICANT CAN REQUEST PRELIMINARY PLAT TO BE PHASED IF THE PHASING SCHEDULE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

THEY ARE REQUESTING PHASE ONE HAVE COMPLETION DATE OF JANUARY 1, 2023. THAT WOULD REQUIRE THEM TO HAVE A FINAL PLAT SUBMITTED, APPROVED, PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE ACCEPTED BY THE CITY BY THAT DATE.

WITHIN PHASE ONE THERE IS APPROXIMATELY 271 LOTS.

PHASE TWO, THEY ARE REQUESTING COMPLETION DATE OF JANUARY 1,

[01:15:05]

2024, WHICH CONSISTS OF THE 331 RESIDENTIAL LOTS.

PHASE THREE, GENERAL 1, 2025. 185 LOTS.

PHASE FOUR JANUARY 1, 2026, DOES NOT CONSIST OF THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING LOTS. IT'S COMMUNITY RETAIL, MIXED USE AND THE MULTIFAMILY LOTS. THAT WOULD BE AGAIN, THAT IS JANUARY 1, 2026. THE THIRD PLAN IS WEATHERFORD ROAD AND WARD ROAD. AS PROPOSED, MINOR ARTERIAL REQUIRING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION OF 990 FEET.

THEY SHOW THAT IN THE PRELIMINARY PLAT.

THE TWO REQUIRED ROADS ARE WITHIN THIS DOCUMENT AND THEY HAVE PROPER RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION.

SUBJECT PROPERTY WILL HAVE THE TWO DIRECT ACCESS POINTS.

TO THE U.S. HIGHWAY 287. ON THE NORTH END.

THEY WILL HAVE MULTIPLE ACCESS POINTS ON OLD FORT WORTH ROAD ON THE SOUTH PORTION OF THE PROPERTY.

DETAIL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REQUIRE IN THE CIVIL ENGINEERING PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT. PRIOR TO A FINAL PLAT BEING APPROVED AND RECORDED. ONCE AGAIN, PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED ALL REQUIRED RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION IS PROPERLY DEDICATED AND SHOWN ON THE PRELIMINARY PLAT.

THEY MEAN ALL THE MEANS OF THE INGRESS, EGRESS FOR FIRE CODE AND NUMBER OF LOTS. IT DOES MEET ALL THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT AND THE STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL. I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AT

THIS TIME. >> DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? OR THE APPLICANT?

>> I HAD ONE. THE TWO ROADS THAT COME OUT ON

287. >> TRENTON: WEATHERFORD ROAD AND WARD ROAD. TURN TO PAGE 24 OF YOUR PACKET, YOU WILL SEE OVERALL CONCEPT PLAN.

WEATHERFORD, IT'S KNOWN AS MILLER ROAD.

LOCATED ON THE WESTERN PORTION. THAT INTERSECTS LOT OF THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING.

IT GOES OLD FORT WORTH TO 287. AND IT'S IN THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN. WARD IS TO THE EASTERN WHICH SUBDIVIDES AND SPLITS UP THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL FROM THE REST OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.

THAT IS NOT PLATTED AS PART OF THE PROJECT.

>> OKAY. MY QUESTION WAS GOING TO BE

WHERE DO THEY COME OUT ON 287? >> TRENTON: WHERE

APPROXIMATELY? >> IS THERE PLANS FOR THE ROADS TO BE ON THE OTHER SIDE? IS THAT ULTIMATELY AN INTERSECTION THERE OR IS THIS JUST GOING TO EMPTY OUT ON ONE

SIDE? >> TRENTON: RIGHT NOW THAT IS WHAT THE T.I.A. IS REQUIRED FOR. THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS BEFORE THE FINAL PLAT. ONE OF OUR CONCERNS AND THE APPLICANT HAD THE SAME CONCERN WHEN WE TALKED TO THEIR ENGINEERS MULTIPLE TIMES ABOUT THIS.

YOU WILL HEAR THE SAME CONVERSATION WITH THE NEXT PRELIMINARY PLAT BEFORE YOU. IT SHOWS IN THE PHASING PLAN IF YOU LOOK AT THE PAGE, THE NEXT PAGE 25, THE PHASING PLAN.

IT DOES SHOW PROPOSED ACCESS ROADS ALONG 287.

AS PHASES ARE DEVELOPED. HOWEVER, WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT NOW IN THE T.U.A. WILL HELP BETTER ASSIST THIS IS HOW DO WE GO AHEAD AND DO THAT? HOW DO WE HAVE THE ACCESS ROAD MAKE SURE IT'S SAFE? WHEN THEY COME OUT.

RIGHT NOW HOW IT'S DRAWN AND HOW IT IS DESIGN AND HOW THE ORIGINAL CONCEPT PLAN APPROVED WITH THE PD-18 SHOWED HAVING THE DIRECT ACCESS POINTS DIRECTLY TO THE 287.

THAT WILL BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT.

>> OKAY. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: OTHER QUESTIONS? MOTION?

>> YES, SIR. I HAVE A COMMENT.

I HAVE THE SAME ISSUE WITH THIS PARTICULAR SUBDIVISION AS I DO MANY OTHERS THAT HAVE COME BEFORE US.

THAT IS THE FRONT-SIDE YARDS. I DON'T THINK IT'S WHAT WE WANT.

IT'S CERTAINLY NOT WHAT I WANT. TO SEE A PERSON WALK OUT IN THEIR FRONT YARD AND SEE PROTRUDING IN THE FRONT YARD DOWN THE STREET THE BACKYARD SO SOMEBODY ELSE'S RESIDENCE.

>> TRENTON: YOU ARE RIGHT. I KNOW THAT WE HAVE SAID THAT IN THE PAST. PD-18, THEY ARE NOT HAVING FOR AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE SO WITH THE PLAT WE CAN'T CHANGE REGULATIONS THEY ARE MINIMUM THE MINIMUM REGULATION OF THE P.D. SO RIGHT NOW WHAT THEY PROPOSE IS THE MINIMUM REGULATION OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OF PD-18.

IF THEY WITHER COME IN AND REQUEST SOMETHING ELSE AND REOPEN THE P.D. THAT COULD BE A TIME TO ADDRESS THAT, IF THEY OPEN UP THAT PORTION OF THE P.D. OUR LEGAL WOULD BE BETTER ABLE TO ANSWER THAT FOR ME. IF I'M INCORRECT.

[01:20:01]

>> THANK YOU, SIR. >> TRENTON: YOU'RE WELCOME.

>> MY QUESTION IS HOW IS MILLER ROAD? DOES IT INTEND TO STAY AS IT IS? IS IT GOING TO BE IMPROVED WITH THIS SUBDIVISION? CAN IT HANDLE ALL THE ADDITIONAL

TRAFFIC? >> PER THE T.I.A. --

>> I'M STATING THAT BASED ON THE QUALITY.

OF THE INTEGRITY OF THE ROAD. >> TRENTON: I CAN ONLY ANSWER WHAT IS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT. ROADS WITHIN THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL MEET OUR STANDARDS. MILLER ROAD, BECAUSE OLD FORT WORTH ROAD DIVIDES MILLER ROAD. THE SOUTHERN PORTION.

I'D REFER BACK TO THE ENGINEER. I BELIEVE HE IS HERE.

SORRY, THE MASK MAKE IT HARDER TO SEE.

I HAVE NOT HEARD OF ANYTHING ABOUT IMPROVING MILLER ROAD.

THERE ARE REGULATIONS WITHIN THE P.D. U.S. THAT STATES THAT CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS HAVE TO BE DONE TO OLD FORT WORTH ROAD AS DEVELOPMENT OCCURS. SO THERE WILL BE IMPROVEMENTS THAT THE CITY HAVE TO DO AND THAT THE DEVELOPMENT HAS TO DO REGARDING THE OLD FORT WORTH ROAD.

>> ONE OF THE ITEMS FOR THE BOND COMMITTEE TO CONSIDER.

DON'T THINK IT'S PUT ON THE BOND PACKAGE BUT IT IS IN THE WORKS TO BE -- OLD FORT WORTH ROAD. NOT MILLER BUT OLD FORT WORTH ROAD. YES.

I THINK THE DENSITY, I THINK NEXT TIME IT WILL COME UP IT WILL KICK IT UP TO FAST TRACK IT.

OTHER QUESTIONS? MOTIONS?

>> MOVE TO APPROVE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER HILL. I WILL SECOND THAT MOTION.

NO FURTHER DISCUSSION I'LL CALL IT FOR VOTE.

COMMISSIONER ALTMAN, AYE. COMMISSIONER KOEHLER?

>> MEMBER KOEHLER: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER

HILL? >> MEMBER HILL: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER OSBORN?

>> MEMBER OSBORN: AYE. COMMISSIONER BATEMAN?

>> MEMBER BATEMAN: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER

STEPHENS? >> MEMBER STEPHENS: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: ALL RIGHT. THE MOTION CARRIES.

APPLICATION IS APPROVED 6-0. NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS

[007 Consider and act upon a request for a Preliminary Plat of Bridgewater, being 576.74± acres out of the W.M. Lick Survey, Abstract No. 620; The John Early Survey, Abstract No. 343; the A.R. Newton Survey, Abstract No. 807; The P.I.C. Survey, Abstract No. 1240; the Z. Heath Survey, Abstract No. 455; the J. Kyser Survey, Abstract No. 597; the I. Cooper Survey, Abstract No. 226; J.H. Witherspoon Survey, Abstract No. 1137; JH Witherspoon Survey Abstract No. 1136; Bf Witherspoon Survey, Abstract No. 1180; J.P. Neill Survey, Abstract No. 1387; J. Powers Survey, Abstract No. 836; and C. Phipps Survey Abstract No. 861. The property is generally located north of U.S. Highway 287, between South Walnut Grove Road and Rex Odom Drive (Case No. PP03-2021-10).]

NUMBER 7. TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BRIDGEWATER. BEING 576.74 ACRES.

GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF THE U.S. HIGHWAY 287 BETWEEN SOUTH WALNUT GROVE ROAD AND REX ODOM DRIVE.

>> TRENTON: THANK YOU. THEY ARE REQUESTING PRELIMINARY PLAT 576 ACRES OF THE BRIDGEWATER DEVELOPMENT.

IT'S NOT ENCOMPASSING THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT.

WITHIN THAT 576 ACRES IT WILL CONTAIN 1,420 LOTS.

BEING COME PRAISED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOT AND COMMON AREA LOTS. RECENTLY THE PROPERTY WAS REZONED TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 136 THAT YOU WERE ABLE TO LISTEN TO MULTIPLE MEETINGS. PUBLIC WORK DISCUSSED THESE.

THEY ARE ALSO AS I MENTIONED REQUESTING A PHASING SCHEDULE TO BE APPROVED AS PART OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT.

THEY HAVE BROKEN IT UP TO THE SIX DIFFERENT PHASES.

BEING 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B. ALL EXPIRING ON DECEMBER 31.

IN THE SUBSEQUENT YEARS. 1A, 2022.

2023, ALL THE WAY UP TO 2027 FOR EACH PHASE.

BREAKDOWN OF THE LOTS IS ON PAGE 34 OF THE PACKET.

PHASE 1A BEING 324 LOTS. 1B, 133.

2A, 385. 2B, 151.

3A, 291. PHASE 3B, 126.

EQUALING THE 1,420 LOTS. ONE THING I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT IF YOU RECALL AS PART OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT THERE WAS A SECTION THAT HAS SOME RESIDENTIAL MORE TOWARD THE NORTH. THAT IS NOT BEING INCLUDED THIS PRELIMINARY PLAT. THEY WILL COME BACK AT A LATER TIME TO DO THAT. THERE IS ALSO SOME, IF YOU SEE THIS AREA, THERE IS AN AREA RIGHT HERE.

RIGHT HERE I MEAN, WHERE THEY ALSO HAD ADDITIONAL SINGLE-FAMILY THAT WAS APPROVED AS PART OF THE P.D.

THAT IS NOT PART OF THIS PRELIMINARY PLAT.

THEY WILL NEED TO COME IN WITH ANOTHER ONE AT ANOTHER DATE.

THE TOWNHOMES ALONG 287, THE TOWNHOMES AND THE NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS ARE ALSO NOT PART OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT. THIS IS SOLELY THE AREA FOR THE PRELIMINARY PLAT. I WANT TO MAKE SURE IT WAS CLEAR SO WHEN YOU SEE THIS BEING DEVELOPED OR COMING THROUGH, OR IF YOU SEE ANOTHER PRELIMINARY PLAT LATER ON.

F DIFFERENT AREAS THAT IS WHY IT'S GOING TO BE THAT WAY.

THE THIRD PER PLAN DESIGNATES WALNUT GROVE ROAD AS A MAJOR ARTERIAL REQUIRING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF DEDICATION OF 120 FEET. AS YOU KNOW, CITY HAS BEEN ACTIVELY IN THE PROCESS FOR QUITE A WHILE NOW.

ON BOND PROJECT, ET CETERA. IT'S WORKING ON THE WALNUT GROVE

[01:25:01]

ROAD ROAD. UPGRADING THAT.

CHANGING IT TO MEET THOROUGHFARE PLAN.

TO ASSIST TRAFFIC IN THE AREA. AS DEVELOPMENT OCCURS THERE IS IMPROVEMENTS MADE AS WELL WITH THE DEVELOPMENT.

THE REQUIRED DEDICATION, THAT IS REQUIRED HAS BEEN FOR THIS SUBJECT FOR ALL RIGHT-OF-WAYS HAS BEEN SHOWN CORRECTLY WITHIN THE PRELIMINARY PLATS. ON THE SOUTHSIDE OF THE PROJECT, ONCE AGAIN, THERE IS DIRECT ACCESS TO THE 287.

GOING TO THE PRESIDENTIAL PARKWAY.

THERE IS GOING TO BE AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT, THEY WOULD HAVE LANGUAGE TO DETAIL CONSTRUCTION OF THE SERVICE ROAD ALONG 287.

THERE IS A NOTE ON THE PLAT THAT SPECIFIES THAT THE ACCESS SERVICE ROAD WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE DEVELOPED AS THE DEVELOPMENTT OCCURS WITHIN THE BRIDGEWATER DEVELOPMENT.

THAT IS ONE OF THE BIGGEST CONCERNS WAS ONCE AGAIN THE ACCESS ROADS ALONG 287. WHEN WILL THEY BE CONSTRUCTED AND HOW WILL THEY BE CONS CONSTRUCTED? THAT IS SOMETHING WE CONTINUOUSLY WORK ON WITH THE DEVELOPER AND THAT IS SOMETHING THEY WON'T TO SEE AS WELL.

IT DOES MEET THE MINIMUM REGULATIONS WITHIN THE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND SUBDIVISION REGULATION FOR THE PRELIMINARY PLAT. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL WITH PROPOSED PHASE PLAN. I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AT

THIS TIME. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: ANY

QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? >> ONCE AGAIN, TRENT, THE ONLY ISSUE I HAVE HERE IS FRONT SIDE YARD.

FRONT YARD CONTINUITY THAT IT BRINGS TO THE DEVELOPMENT.

>> TRENTON: OKAY. >> QUICK QUESTION TO REFRESH MY MEMORY. WHAT WAS THE NUMBER OF THE HOMES BUILT TO TRIGGER THE AMENITY CENTER?

>> TRENTON: OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD --

>> WAS IT 1,000? >> TRENTON: IT DEPENDS ON THE AMENITY. IT'S OFTEN THE NUMBER OF THE

BUILDING PERMITS. >> 450?

>> TRENTON: 450? RIGHT.

THIS PLAT? >> TRENTON: NO.

THAT LOCATION IS INCLUDED. YES, YES.

>> TRYING TO SKIP THROUGH. >> TRENTON: THE AMENITY CENTER IS LOCATED RIGHT HERE. IN PHASE 3A.

>> OKAY. I WANT TO MAKE SURE IT WAS

INCLUDED IN THIS. >> TRENTON: IS SOMETHING WE DID DISCUSS WITH THEM. LETTING THEM KNOW HEY, FOR SOME REASON, THESE LOTS ARE DONE, YOU ARE REQUIRED TO DO THAT AMENITY CENTER EVEN IF THE PRELIMINARY AREA IS NOT.

SO THEY DID ADJUST STREETS, LOTS AND ALL OF THAT TO ADDRESS WHEN THE AMENITY CENTER WOULD BE CONSTRUCTED.

>> THE ENTRYWAYS TO 287 ARE GOING TO COME OUT ON THE SERVICE ROAD, NOT ON TO THE HIGHWAY; IS THAT CORRECT?

>> TRENTON: CORRECT. PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT I MENTIONED. IT'S WHAT WE ARE, THE -- WE HAVE LANGUAGE IN THERE TO DETAIL CONSTRUCTION OF THE SERVICE ROADS TO PREVENT DIRECT ACCESS TO 287.

>> OKAY. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: ALL RIGHT.

ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS? DISCUSSION?

MOTIONS? >> MOVE TO APPROVE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HILL.

I'LL SECOND THAT. AYE.

CALL IT TO A VOTE. ALTMAN, AYE.

COMMISSIONER KOEHLER? >> MEMBER KOEHLER: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER HILL?

>> MEMBER HILL: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER

OSBORN? >> MEMBER OSBORN: AYE

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER STEPHENS?

>> MEMBER STEPHENS: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: IT CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY. THE PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED.

[008 Conduct a public hearing and consider and act upon an ordinance changing the zoning of ±.7214 acres of land, being lot 3RR, Roark Addition, City of Midlothian, Ellis County, from Community Retail (CR) District to Commercial (C) District. The property is located at 1507 North U.S. Highway 67 (Case No. Z01-2021-03).]

THANK YOU. THE NEXT ITEM ON NUMBER 8 CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER AND ACT ON ORDINANCE CHANGING THE ZONING OF .72 ACRES.

LOCATED AT 1507U.S. HIGHWAY 67. >> MARCOS: THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATED OFF OF THE U.S. HIGHWAY 67, NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF EAST RIDGEWAY DRIVE. THE SITE DOES CONTAIN A 3900 SCARE FOOT BUILDING THAT IS, DOES CONTAINED STRIPED PARKING AND DRIVE ACCESS ALREADY. THE APPLICANT DOES PLAN TO OPEN VETERINARY CLINIC AT THIS LOCATION OR ANIMAL HOSPITAL.

BUT CURRENTLY THE VET CLINICS ARE NOT PERMITTED IN A COMMUNITY RETAIL DISTRICT. IF IT'S REZONED TO A COMMERCIAL DISTRICT A VET CLINIC WOULD BE PERMITTED IF AN S.U.P. APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. THIS CASE FOLLOWING THIS REZONE REQUEST WILL OUTLINE DETAILS OF THE UPCOMING S.U.P.

AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE SCREEN THE SUBJECT AREA COMPLETELY

[01:30:01]

SURROUNDED BY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.

P.D. THE NORTH IS A CONTRACTOR SHOP.

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOES SHOW THAT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FALLS WITHIN WHAT WE CALL AN URBAN MODULE LOW DENSITY.

THIS MODULE IS CHARACTERIZED BY THE SMALL LOTS.

SINGLE FAMILY AND THE DUPLEX HOMES.

ALTHOUGH THE PLAN DOES STATE THAT THE SMALL SCALE RETAIL OFFICE USE SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED IN THE MODULE.

STUFF FEELS THAT REZONING TO A COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WOULD BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING USES AND THE EXISTING BUSINESSES THAT ARE ALREADY THERE. TEN LETTER TOES PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET SENT OUT. STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED RESPONSES. THEY WOMENS APPROVE OF THE REZONE REQUEST. I CAN STAND FOR QUESTIONS.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? SEEING NONE WOULD THE APPLICANT LIKE TO -- SORRY.

COMMISSIONER BATEMAN? >> MEMBER BATEMAN: I WAS JUST GOING TO MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: OKAY. IF THERE IS NO ONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. SEEING NONE.

WE'LL GO AHEAD. MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.

SECOND? >> SECOND.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: HAVE A SECOND BY OSBORN.

CALL VOTE. COMMISSIONER ALTMAN, AYE.

COMMISSIONER KOEHLER? >> MEMBER KOEHLER: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER HILL?

>> MEMBER HILL: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER

OSBORN? >> MEMBER OSBORN: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER BATEMAN?

>> MEMBER BATEMAN: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER

STEPHENS? >> MEMBER STEPHENS: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: IT'S CLOSED BY 6-0.

ANY MOTIONS? >> MOTION TO APPROVE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BATEMAN TO APPROVE.

I WILL SECOND THAT. CALL IT TO VOTE.

COMMISSIONER ALTMAN, AYE. COMMISSIONER KOEHLER?

>> MEMBER KOEHLER: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER

HILL? >> MEMBER HILL: AYE.

>> COMMISSIONER OSBORN? >> MEMBER OSBORN: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER BATEMAN?

>> MEMBER BATEMAN: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER

STEPHENS? >> MEMBER STEPHENS: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: THE APPLICATION IS APPROVED BY 6-0 VOTE. NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA ITEM 9

[009 Conduct a public hearing and consider and act upon an ordinance for a Specific Use Permit (SUP) to allow for a Veterinary/Small Animal Clinic (no outside pens) and/or animal emergency room relating to the use and development of ±.7214 acres of land, being lot 3RR, Roark Addition, City of Midlothian, Ellis County, and presently zoned Community Retail (CR) District to be used for non-residential uses. The property is located at 1507 North U.S. Highway 67 (Case No. SUP01-2021-02).]

TO THE CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING AND ACT UPON AN ORDINANCE FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW VETERINARY SMALL ANIMAL CLINIC

AT 1507 NORTH U.S. HIGHWAY 67. >> THE APPLICANT ASKING TO ASK FOR THE VET CLINIC AT THIS SITE. THIS IS AN IMAGE OF THE BUILDING TO HOUSE THIS PROPOSED CLINIC. THE PROPERTY IS ALREADY LANDSCAPED AND STRIPEDDED FOR THE PARKING.

STRIPED FOR THE FIRE LANE. PROPOSED USE WILL OPERATE 24 HOURS A DAY, SERVE DAYS A WEEK. OWL HOLIDAYS.

APPLICANT STATED ALL ANIMALS WILL BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE FACILITY AT ALL TIMES. ONLY GOING, YOU KNOW, OUT TO THE FENCED AREAS THAT YOU CAN SEE WHERE MY POINTER IS.

THE FENCED AREAS WOULD BE SUPERVISED WALKS AND THE VISITATION WITH THE OWNERS. THE CLINIC WILL NOT DO ANY TYPE OF -- THEY WILL NOT BOARD ANIMALS.

ONLY ANIMALS THAT ARE UNDER THE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CARE MAY STAY ON THE PROPERTY. ADDITIONALLY, APPLICATION DOES PLAN TO EXPAND . IT WILL MAINTAIN IS T SAME FACADE WHEN IT'S COMPLETED BUT IT TRIGGERS THE NEED FOR TWO ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES TO MEET THE CITY REQUIREMENT.

THIS SLIDE HERE DOES -- WELL, WE PRETTY MUCH TALKED A ABOUT THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN. BUT AS YOU DO SEE THIS IS PART OF THE URBAN MODULE. WE CONSIDER THAT THE PLO POSED USE COME PATIBLE WITH THAT URBAN MODULE.

AGAIN, TEN LETTERS SENT OUT TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS IN 200 FEET.

TO DATE WE RECEIVED ZERO RESPONSES.

STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE S.U.P. SUBJECT TO CONDITION TWO PARKING SPACES BE ADDED TO THE SITE.

WITH THAT I CAN STAND FOR QUESTIONS.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: ANY QUESTIONS? ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS? OR APPLICANT LIKE TO MAKE AN PRESENTATION?

>> MOVE WE CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING BY BATEMAN. SECOND?

>> SECOND. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: I HAVE A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KOEHLER. CALL THE VOTE.

COMMISSIONER ALTMAN, AYE. COMMISSIONER KOEHLER?

>> MEMBER KOEHLER: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER

HILL? >> MEMBER HILL: AYE?

COMMISSIONER OSBORN? >> MEMBER OSBORN: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER BATEMAN?

>> MEMBER BATEMAN: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER

STEPHENS? >> MEMBER STEPHENS: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED.

WE HAVE A MOTION OR FURTHER DISCUSSION?

>> MOTION FOR APPROVAL. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY COMMISSIONER BATEMAN.

I WILL SECOND THAT. CALL TO THE VOTE.

COMMISSIONER ALTMAN, AYE. COMMISSIONER KOEHLER?

>> MEMBER KOEHLER: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER

HILL? >> MEMBER HILL: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER OSBORN?

>> MEMBER OSBORN: AYE? COMMISSIONER BATEMAN?

>> MEMBER BATEMAN: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER

STEPHENS? >> MEMBER STEPHENS: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: IT'S APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY 6-0.

THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND ACT

[010 Conduct a public hearing and consider and act upon an ordinance for a Specific Use Permit (SUP) for a restaurant (over 1,000 square feet in size), relating to the use and development of ±.079 acres of land located on Lot 10, Block 12, Section 6, Original Town Addition (commonly known as 138 North 8th Street), and presently zoned Central Business District (CBD) (Case No. SUP02-2021-04).]

UPON AN ORDINANCE FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR RESTAURANT.

LOCATED COMMONLY KNOWN AS 138 NORTH 8TH STREET.

[01:35:04]

PRESENTLY ZONED CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT.

>> TRENTON: THANK YOU. PROPOSED REQUEST TO CHANGE TO ALLOW FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A RESTAURANT.

THE PROPOSED UNIT IS OVER THE 1,000 SQUARE FEET IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT DOES REQUIRE A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT.

THE PROPOSED RESTAURANT 1940S PIZZERIA TAP HOUSE.

THE PROPOSED S.U.P. WON'T ALLOW FOR THE EXTERIOR OF THE STRUCTURE TO BE EXPANDED OR ALTERED.

THE PHYSICAL ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURE OF IT.

THEY ARE REQUESTING TO EXPAND OR AMEND THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE OF IT, IT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO GO BEFORE THE HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD AND PLEN TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL. THEY WOULD HAVE TO REOPEN THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. THEY ARE REQUESTING WITH THE RESTAURANT THAT THE SIGN THAT IS LOCATED ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING OF THE RE/MAX BUILDING THIS IS WHERE THE RE/MAX IS LOCATED AT. THAT THE RE/MAX SIGN ON THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING HERE WILL REMAIN FOR RIGHT NOW.

CAN REMAIN ON THIS FRONT. RIGHT HERE IS THEY HAVE A RE/MAX SIGN POPPING OUT. AS YOU RECALL.

THEY WANT TO REPLACE THAT WITH A SIMILAR SIZE.

TAP HOUSE SISTERS PIZZERIA AS A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT.

THE CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN RECENTLY ADOPTED THE DOWNTOWN PLAN, PURPOSE OF IT WAS TO FIND WAYS TO REVITALIZE DOWNTOWN AND ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO COME DOWN MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, 9:00 TO 5:00 P.M. BUT AT NIGHTTIME ON THE WEEKDAYS.

ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT ASSETS THE CITY HAS IS THE DOWNTOWN.

THE ACTIVITY OF THE DOWNTOWN. AS PART OF THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT STAFF RECOMMENDS NO ADDITIONAL PARKING BE REQUIRED.

VARIOUS CASES, WE BELIEVE WE DON'T HAVE A PARKING ISSUE DOWNTOWN. IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE AROUND THE PEDESTRIAN SCALE. THIS IS A GREAT USE FOR THE PART OF TOWN. WHERE THEY ARE EXCHANGING THE USE OPEN VARIOUS BUSINESS HOURS INSTEAD OF THE TYPICAL 9:00 TO 5:00. WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

WE MOUNT NOTICE OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET.

22 NOTICES SENT OUT. ZERO RESPONSES.

I CAN ANSWER QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME.

>> DO THE DOWNTOWN MERCHANTS HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE SIGNAGE?

>> TRENTON: WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY LETTERS IN

OPPOSITION TO THE REQUEST. >> ISN'T TONY SANDERS THE PRESIDENT OF THE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS?

>> JAMIE IS. >> TRENTON: I HAVEN'T HEARD ANYTHING. IN OUR SIGN REGULATIONS IT DOES ALLOW FOR THESE -- I CAN'T REMEMBER WHAT THEY ARE CALLED.

THESE TYPE OF THE SIGNS. BLADE SIGNS.

CALL ATTACHED TO THE STRUCTURE. THEY ARE PERMITTED.

THEY WANTED TO MAKE SURE PART OF THE SUPERTHEY INCLUDE SIGNAGE PART OF THIS TO SHOW WHAT THEY WANT TO SHOW WHAT IT IS GOING TO BE LIKE. IT WILL BE TAKING OFF RE/MAX

PORTION TO PUT THIS BACK UP. >> PLANNING DIRECTOR ARE YOU

OKAY WITH THE SIGNS? >> TRENTON: ABSOLUTELY, YES.

>> OKAY. >> MR. CHAIRMAN, I MOVE TO CLOSE

PUBLIC HEARING. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: LET ME SEE BEFORE WE DO THAT, WOULD THE APPLICANT WANT TO DO A PRESENTATION OR SPEAK? NO.

THANK YOU. I SECOND THAT MOTION.

CALL IT TO A VOTE. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.

COMMISSIONER ALTMAN, AYE. COMMISSIONER KOEHLER?

>> MEMBER KOEHLER: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER

HILL? >> MEMBER HILL: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER OSBORN?

>> MEMBER OSBORN: AYE

>> MEMBER BATEMAN: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER

STEPHENS? >> STEVE: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED BY 6-0.

DISCUSSION OR MOTIONS? >> MOTION TO APPROVE.

WITH CONDITIONS. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS.

WHAT ARE THE CONDITIONS? >> TRENTON: TO NOT REQUIRE

OFF-STREET PARKING. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: GOT IT.

SO THAT MOTION MADE WITH THE CONDITIONS.

DO I HAVE A SECOND? >> SECOND.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: SECOND BY COMMISSIONER OSBORN.

CALL IT TO VOTE. COMMISSIONER ALTMAN, AYE.

COMMISSIONER KOEHLER? >> MEMBER KOEHLER: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER HILL?

>> MEMBER HILL: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER

OSBORN? >> MEMBER OSBORN: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER BATEMAN?

>> MEMBER BATEMAN: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER

STEPHENS? >> MEMBER STEPHENS: AYE.

THE APPLICATION APPROVED 6-0. THANK YOU, SIR.

LOOKING FORWARD TO P YOUR PIZZA PLACE.

ALL RIGHT. THE NEXT ITEM IS ITEM NUMBER 11.

BEFORE I GO ON I WANT TO BE CLEAR WHY I ASK ABOUT TONY SANDERS. TONY SANDERS SUBMITTED, HE WAS IN FAVOR OF THE ITEM ON AGENDA 10 AND HE SUBMITTED WRITTEN ITEM. OKAY.

ITEM NUMBER 11 IS TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON AN ORDINANCE FOR A

[011 Conduct a public hearing and consider and act upon an ordinance for a Specific Use Permit (SUP) Specific Use Permit (SUP) for a water well, relating to the use and development of a ±16.199-acre tract of land on Lot 1, Block 1 of The Mark on Walter Stephenson (commonly known as 999 Walter Stephenson Road), located in Planned Development District No. 42 (PD-42) (Case No. SUP03-2021-05).]

[01:40:04]

SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A WATER WELL RESULTING TO USE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE 16.19 ACRES. LOT ONE, BLOCK ONE OF THE MARK AND THE WALTER STEPHENSON. LOCATED IN PLANNED DEVELOPMENT

DISTRICT NUMBER 42. >> TRENTON: THANK YOU.

WHAT THE APPLICATION REQUEST WATER WELL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE DETENTION POND. SECTION 2.74 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE. REQUIRES A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR WATER WELL. PART OF THE PROCESS, THEY ARE REQUIRED TO MAKE SURE THEY ARE MEETING CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS THAT CHANGE IN THIS DETENTION PONDS BY ADDING WATER FEATURE WON'T HAVE NEGATIVE IMPACT. THEY HAVE TO GO AHEAD TO GO THROUGH THE CIVIL PROCESS. CITY ENGINEERS SIGN THAT OFF.

TO ALLOW FOR THE WATER WELL. IT'S LOCATED IN THE P.D. 42.

WHEN THEY REQUEST THAT THIS TO BE CONSTRUCTED, WE REQUEST THAT ASSOCIATED PIPING PROVIDED BY THE LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. WE DID HEAR BACK FROM THE PRAIRIE GROUND WATER, CONSERVATION DISTRICT.

THEY APPROVED THE REGISTRATION OF THE PROPOSED WATER WELL THIS IS PART OF THE ASSOCIATION WITH THE S.U.P. LIMITED TO FAILING TO MAINTAIN WATER FEATURE AND IRRIGATION ON THE PROPERTY.

NOT USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE. 15 LETTERS SENT OUT AND ZERO RESPONSES. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? NEW MEMBER COMMITTED A FORM OR APPLICANT WANT TO PRESENT ON THE TOPIC? I MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC

HEARING. >> SECOND.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: SECOND BY BATEMAN.

I'LL CALL IT FOR A VOTE. ALTMAN, AYE.

COMMISSIONER KOEHLER? >> MEMBER KOEHLER: AYE?

COMMISSIONER HILL? >> MEMBER HILL: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER OSBORN?

>> MEMBER OSBORN: AYE. COMMISSIONER BATEMAN?

>> MEMBER BATEMAN: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER

STEPHENS? >> MEMBER STEPHENS: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED.

MOTION? >> SO MADE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: BY BATEMAN. SECOND?

>> SECOND. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: SECOND BY KOEHLER. I'LL CALL THE VOTE.

COMMISSIONER ALTMAN, AYE. KOEHLER?

>> MEMBER KOEHLER: AYE. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER

HILL? >> MEMBER HILL: AYE

COMMISSIONER BATEMAN? >> MEMBER BATEMAN: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: COMMISSIONER STEPHENS?

>> STEVE: AYE. >> MEMBER STEPHENS: AYE.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: THAT CONCLUDES THE AGENDA ITEM.

>> TRENTON: WE HAVE ONE MORE. ITEM 14.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: WE DO? OKAY.

IT'S LOST IN THE SHUFFLE. THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THAT TO

[014 Review and discuss various sections of the City of Midlothian Zoning Ordinance as it pertains to both residential and non-residential development regarding development regulations, design standards, Central Business District (CBD), parking, uses, and amentities. No action will be taken.]

MY ATTENTION. REVIEW AND DISCUSS VARIOUS SECTION OF THE CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN ZONING ORDINANCE AS PERTAINING TO THE RESIDENTIAL AND THE NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT REGARDING THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.

DESIGN STANDARD, CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT, PARKING USE AMENITIES. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN.

>> THANK YOU. >> OVER THE LAST WHILE.

WHAT I'M DOING WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WE ARE GOING THROUGH THE ZONING DEPARTMENT, THE P.D. COME IN AND THE ISSUES WE HAVE SEEN. THINGS THAT WE CAN IMPROVE TO IMPROVE THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. STREAMLINE IT AND CONTINUE TO ENCOURAGE THE SUSTAINABILITY AND THE DEVELOPMENT TO MAINTAIN THE HIGH STANDARDS. LEGISLATION CHANGED TO PREVENT CITIES DOING CERTAIN TH THINGS. PUTTING SHOT CLOCK REQUIREMENTS ON US. WE HAVE BEEN MAINTAINED THE HIGH STANDARDS. WE HAVE HAD THE GOOD RELATIONSHIPS WITH THE DEVELOPERS AND BE ABLE TO GET GOOD PRODUCTS AND THE DEVELOPMENT STILL AND APPROVE AND UNDER CORRECTION. THAT STILL MEET THE HIGH STANDARD. WE HAVE BEEN CREATING A LUST OF THE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT. I WANT TO BRING IT BEFORE YOU TO BRING FORWARD SOME AMENDMENTS WE HAVE BEEN THINKING ABOUT THAT WE HAVE SEEN A LOT OF LATELY TO STREAMLINE VARIOUS ISSUES WE HAVE ALSO SEEN. THIS IS A REVIEW AND DISCUSS UTEM. THERE IS NOT A VOTE ON THIS TONIGHT. IF YOU HAVE DIRECTION WE APPRECIATE IT. COMMENTS WHATSOEVER? THIS IS NOT ALL EVE ENCOMPASSIN. WE SEE P.D.S COME IN.

[01:45:01]

WE WANT TO MAKE SURE WHEN SOMEONE COMES IN WE HAVE THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE MATCHING THE P.D. REQUIREMENTS OF THE HIGHER STANDARDS.

SO WHEN THEY COME IN THESE ARE THE STANDARDS.

IF YOU WANT A P.D., THESE ARE THE MINIMUM STANDARDS.

HOW ARE YOU GOING TO MEET THEM? HOW ARE YOU GOING TO EXCEED THEM SO THERE IS CONSISTENCY ACROSS THE BOARD.

LOOK AT THE P.D. THE AMENITIES IN THERE; SUCH AS, REQUIRING THE COMMUNITY BE AN INTERNET-BASED COMMUNITY.

IF YOU ARE MOVING IN A COMMUNITY THAT IS NOT AN EXPECT-BASED COMMUNITY, I WOULD LIKE TO MEET YOU.

EVERY COMMUNITY WE HAVE SEEN LATELY THAT HAS BEEN A NO-BRAINER. THERE IS ALSO COACH LIGHTS AS AN AMENITY FOR THE P.D. WE FIGURE COACH LIGHTS IS NOT SOMETHING -- THAT IS A GIVEN NOW.

SO THERE ARE VARIOUS THINGS IN THE P.D. THAT ARE ALREADY GIVEN.

WHAT WE START TO SEE IS WHAT WE HAVE SEEN, WHAT WE HAVE SEEN IS P.D.S ARE NOT UNIQUE. WE WANT TO SEE WHEN YOU COME IN WITH A P.D. OUR GOAL IS THAT IT IS UNIQUE.

IT'S DIFFERENT. IT'S SOMETHING THAT STICKS OUT FROM EVERY OTHER DEVELOPMENT. THAT IS THE PURPOSE OF SOME OF THE CHANGES. HOW DO WE MAKE A P.D. MORE UNIQUE SO THEY HAVE TO COME IN FOR THE CHANGES FOR CERTAIN REASONS. SIDEWALKS, SOMETHING WE ARE PLAYING AROUND WITH. WE HAVE TALKED A LOT ABOUT THE SIDEWALKS. GENERALLY THE SIDEWALK WIDTH IS FIVE FEET. CHANGED FROM FOUR TO FIVE FEET.

IN CERTAIN AREAS WHAT THE CITY HAS DONE ON OUR OWN SIDEWALKS THAT WE HAVE PUT IN, WE INCREASE THOSE ALONG 14TH.

FROM FIVE FEET TO EIGHT FEET ON ONE SIDE.

SO THAT ACTS AS A TRAIL. WHAT WE WANT TO DO WITH THE SIDEWALKS IS PUT A DIFFERENT CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM.

DEPENDING ON THE ROAD YOU ARE ABUTTING -- THESE ARE ALL IN DISCUSSION. WE HAVEN'T FINALIZED ANYTHING.

BUT DEPEND TONG ROAD YOU ARE ABUTTING DETERMINES THE MINIMUM

SIDEWALK WIDTH. >> SO IF IT'S A MAJOR

THOROUGHFARE, EIGHT FOOT -- >> TRENTON: RIGHT.

ALONG THE LINES. IF YOU USE -- WE HAVE SEEN DEVELOPERS DO, WE ARE USING THE SIDEWALK AS A TRAIL AS WELL.

STILL A FIVE-FOOT SIDEWALK. IF YOU USE IT AS A TRAIL PART OF THE TRAIL SYSTEM, EXPAND IT TO EIGHT FEET ON ONE SIDE.

TO REALLY ENCOURAGE THE HIGHER STANDARDS.

THINGS THAT WILL BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE.

C.B.D. DOWNTOWN. WE ADOPTED A GREAT DOWNTOWN PLAN WE SAW A LOT OF PUBLIC INPUT. WE RECENTLY SINCE THE DOWNTOWN PLAN WAS ADOPTED WE HAVE SEEN I THINK RIGHT NOW THREE BUSINESSES WANT TO DOM IN. TWO RESTAURANTS.

RESIDENT NEIGHBORHOOD GROCERY STORE.

THESE ARE THE GREAT THINGS. WHAT WE WANT TO DO IS LOOK AT OUR DOWNTOWN REGULATIONS TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO DO WE STREAMLINE THAT? WHAT USES DO WE PERMIT BY RIGHT RATHER THAN GO THROUGH THE S.U.P. PROCESS.

RATHER THAN GOING THROUGH LONG PROCESS, TIME IS MONEY FOR A SMALL BUSINESS OWNER, TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE.

A LOT OF THE BUILDINGS IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ARE ALREADY CONSTRUCTED. THEY HAVE A HISTORICAL NATURE.

THERE IS A PROCESS, TO GO THROUGH THE P&Z AND COUNCIL TO CHANGE HISTORICAL STRUCTURE. THAT IS COVERED.

WE DISCUSSED WHAT DESIGN REQUIREMENTS DO WE WANT IN DOWNTOWN? DO WE WANT TO SET THEM IN STONE? WE HAVE LOOSE STANDARDS NOW IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT.

DO WE EXPAND THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT? IS THAT SOMETHING THAT THESE GUIDELINES DO WE EXPAND PAST THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AS WE CONTINUE TO GROW? AS THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT CONTINUES TO PROGRESS.

THE SIGN REGULATIONS. ONE THING WE HAVE SEEN, WE HAVE A LOT OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY.

USES THAT ARE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. BUT THEY ARE REALLY COMMERCIAL-ORIENTED. THE SIGN REGULATIONS ARE VERY BROAD. THEY CAN HAVE MORE SIGNAGE.

NOT THE SAME STRICT STANDARDS. WE BELIEVE IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE HAVE GONE BACK TO LOOK AT TO ELIMINATE THAT AND REQUIRE THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS TO HAVE THE SAME STANDARDS AS THE COMMUNITY RETAIL, COMMERCIAL, PROFESSIONAL AND OFFICE

DISTRICT. >> MEMBER ALTMAN: I THINK WE NEED TO LOOK AT THAT. THE SIGN REGULATIONS.

I MEAN WE STARTED WITH THE SIGN REGULATIONS, THE BATTLE.

I HAVE BEEN DOING THIS FOR 20 YEARS SINCE BROOKSHIRE WENT UP.

WE WANT TO GET RID OF THE POLE SIGN AND THE SIGN BLIGHT THAT YOU SEE. I'LL PICK ON RED OAK.

YOU KNOW THEY LET POLE SIGNS GO IN.

IF YOU DRIVE BY THAT IT'S JUST POLE SIGNS EVERYWHERE.

[01:50:01]

YES. WE NEED TO FIGURE OUT HOW WE DO IT. BECAUSE "A," FOR THOSE WE HAVEN'T BEEN RESTRICTIVE ENOUGH FOR LIKE THE INDUSTRIAL AREAS.

I THINK WE SOLVED A LOT OF PROBLEMS WITH THE SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT. WE KEPT SIGNS DOWN AND HEALTH KROGER TO 15 LESS THAN THEY WANTED ORIGINALLY.

GOING BACK TO THE DOWNTOWN, WE NEED TO ALLOW THE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICT TO HAVE A LITTLE MORE FREEDOM TO HAVE THE OFF-SITE. COLLECTIVE SIGNAGE.

FIGURE OUT A WAY TO DO THAT TO DRIVE SIGNAGE TO DOWNTOWN.

SO PEOPLE KNOW THE BUSINESSES ARE THERE.

I WAS REALLY EXCITED ABOUT WHAT WE DID WITH THE PIZZERIA.

THAT IS OUTSTANDING. THAT IS THE KIND OF THING WE NEED TO DO. STUFF THAT IS HISTORICAL AND HAS A UNIQUE GRID LOOK LIKE IT DID. IF WE CAN WORK WITH THE OWNERS AND CREATE SPECIFIC CATEGORIES FOR THE DOWNTOWN.

AND NOT HAVE A ONE SIZE FIT ALL, WE WILL STEP UP THE SIGN REGULATION EVEN BETTER THAN IT IS.

>> TRENTON: I AGREE. MY NEXT COUPLE OF SLIDES, QUICK.

I ALREADY TALKED ABOUT IT. ONE THING IS THE SIGN IN THE DOWNTOWN CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT.

HOW DO WE READDRESS THE SIGNAGE. GARAGES, QUICKLY GO PAST THAT.

WE HAVEN'T DISCUSSED GARAGES TOO MUCH.

I HEARD IT ONCE OR TWICE. I MEAN, I HAVE TALKED ABOUT A LOT OF THESE. SOME THINGS, THE ABOUT TEXTURE AND THE LANDSCAPING IN THE RESIDENTIAL AREAS.

ONE THING WE THOUGHT GOING THROUGH THE LANDSCAPING IS MINIMUM WIDTH OF SIDEWALK. BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. HOW LARGE DOES IT HAVE TO BE? SOME STAFF DROVE THROUGH WAXAHACHIE HISTORICAL PARK IN WAXAHACHIE TO LOOK HOW THEY INCORPORATE THE LANDSCAPING AND THE SIDEWALKS AND THE EXISTING HISTORICAL NEIGHBORHOODS.

THESE ARE ALL THINGS TO LOOK AT. HOW DO WE DO THESE CERTAIN SEC TECHCHURAL DESIGNS? INDUSTRY FEATURES.

IT ALSO GOES TO THE P.D.S. IS THERE A THEME CONSISTENCY? WE WANT CONSISTENCY. WE WANT UNIQUENESS TO PROVIDE US MORE SUSTAINABLE HIGHER STANDARDS.

THERE IS CONSISTENCY. BUT THIS IS THE OWN DEVELOPMENT

AND UNIQUE IN A CERTAIN WAY. >> WHAT IS YOUR TAKE ON THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN? WHAT ARE YOU THINKING THERE?

>> WE HAVE THOUGHT ABOUT A LOT. MARCOS HAS BEEN DONE A QUITE OF BIT OF RESEARCH ON THAT. WE LOOKED AT THE VARIOUS, A LOT OF COMMUNITIES. WHAT THEY HAVE DONE.

I MEAN, HOW OFTEN DO YOU REPEAT ELEVATIONS? WHAT ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES WITH THE NONRESIDENTIAL PRODUCT, ARTICULATION. DO WE REQUIRE MORE ARTICULATION OR MORE ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE; SUCH AS, CERTAIN LIGHTING? ON THE P.D. IF YOU REMEMBER Q.T. DISCOUNT TIRE CAME IN.

I CAN'T THINK. WENDY'S CAME IN.

THAT AREA WHEN THEY STARTED TO COME IN, WE REQUIRED CERTAIN THINGS THAT ARE NOWHERE IN THE ORDINANCE.

WE TALKED TO THEM. WE BORKED IT OUT WITH THEM AS -- WE WORKED IT OUT WITH THE P.D. WE WANT IT TO BE THE MINIMUM

REQUIREMENTS. >> YOU ARE DOING A GREAT JOB ON

THAT. >> TRENTON: THANK YOU.

>> CITY MANAGER EARLY ON DID A GREAT JOB ON THAT WALMART DOWN THERE. WHEN WALMART EMPTIES OUT AND THE BUILDING IS TORN DOWN. I LIKE THAT.

WE DON'T WANT NEED VACANT BUILDINGS.

SPEAKING OF THAT, DO WE HAVE ANY PLANS FOR THE NEW ACQUISITION OF THE PROPERTY THAT WE HAVE DOWNTOWN?

>> TRENTON: THAT IS ON -- UNFORTUNATELY, I MEAN, I CAN'T ANSWER THAT. IT'S NOT ON THE AGENDA.

SO I DON'T THINK WE CAN LEGALLY TALK ABOUT IT TONIGHT SINCE IT'S

ON THE AGENDA. >> WE WILL BRING IT TO THE

COUNCIL. >> OKAY.

WELL -- >> A LOT OF INTEREST.

>> I'M SURE YOU HAD A LOT TO DO WITH THE ACQUISITION OF THAT.

THANK YOU, SIR. >> TRENTON: IT'S A GREAT IMPROVEMENT DOWNTOWN. IT WILL BE A GREAT ADDITION.

SO THESE ARE SOME THINGS THAT WE TALKED ABOUT.

TALK ABOUT HOW TO DETERMINE SIDEWALKS.

C.B.D. DOWNTOWN. A USE I LOOK AT IS THE RESTAURANTS. OVER 1,000 SQUARE FEET.

WE HAVE HAD TWO COME IN THAT REQUIRED SPECIFIC USE PERMITS.

IT'S TAKEN A LOT OF TIME FOR THEM.

I MEAN A LOT OF THEM BY RIGHT. MAYBE ALLOW THEM ANYTHING UNDER -- AND THE GROCERY STORES. THINGS I WAS THINKING.

GOING THROUGH THE USE TABLE. ALLOW THE NEIGHBORHOOD GROCERY STORES UNDER 3,000 SQUARE FEET. THINKING OF THE THINGS HOW TO STREAMLINE THE PROCESS. IS THERE A WAY TO ALLOW FOR SOMETHING SIMILAR TO U.V.P.D. WITHOUT GOING THROUGH THE WHOLE PROCESS. WHAT STANDARDS CAN WE IMPROVE? THAT IS WHERE I CAN CAME. SOMETHING YOU HAVE ON THE FUTURE AGENDA. IS PARKING.

DOWNTOWN. SOMETHING TO COME AND TALK TO YOU ABOUT AS A TEXT AMENDMENT. I WON'T TALK MORE ABOUT THAT

NOW. >> I MEAN, LET ME MAKE A STATEMENT HERE. IF YOU DON'T MIND.

[01:55:01]

>> TRENTON: YES. >> IN SOME AREAS WE ARE OVER PARK AND OTHER AREAS WE ARE UNDER PARKED.

>> TRENTON: AGREE. >> ONE AREA THAT TROUBLES ME THE MOST IS WE HAD, WE HAD A DAYCARE CENTER GO IN TO A CHURCH.

CHURCH OPERATES ON SUNDAY. DAYCARE OPERATES ON WEEKDAYS.

SO WE OBLIGATED THEM TO PUT I DON'T KNOW 60 PARKING SPACES IN FOR THE CHILDREN. THE PARENTS ARE GOING TO DROP OFF THE KIDS. KIDS DON'T NEED PARKING SPACES.

I THINK THAT NEEDS TO BE RELOOKED AT.

>> TRENTON: YEAH. CAR WASHES, IF WE WERE FOLLOW REQUIREMENT FOR THE CAR WASHES IT WOULD HAVE BEEN OVER 100 SPACES FOR THE WASH MASTERS. THESE ARE WE ARE ALSO DISCUSSING IS PARKING. ANOTHER ONE.

>> GREAT. I'M GLAD YOU ARE.

I'D RATHER SEE TREES THAN SPARKING PLACES THAT ARE NEVER

USED. >> TRENTON: THIS IS SIGN REGULATION WE TALKED ABOUT. THE GARAGES.

THIS IS GOING TO MONTHS ON MONTHS.

I DON'T KNOW HOW LONG IT WILL BE DISCUSSED.

BUT THINGS WE HAVE SEEN. COMP PLAN SAYS ONE THING AND THE ZONING ORDINANCE SAYS ANOTHER. STRAIGHT ZONING SAYS ANOTHER.

SO WE HAVE THREE REGULATIONS FOR 450 SQUARE FEET OF PARKING SPACE. THESE ARE THE THINGS WE WANT TO BRING FORTH HOPEFULLY WILL BE BRINGING SOONER THAN LATER.

SOME OF THE CHANGES. IF YOU EVER COME ACROSS, ANY OF THE COMMISSIONERS COME ACROSS THE CHANGES YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE OR HEARING ABOUT LET US KNOW SO WE CAN PUT IT AT AND LOOK AT

IT MORE. >> ARE YOU LOOKING AT ANY

POLICIES ON GARAGE CONVERSIONS? >> TRENTON: WE HAVE A POLICY FOR GARAGE CONVERSIONS. IN THE ZONING, WE HAVE PROVISION FOR GARAGE CONVERSION. IT'S NOT BEEN DISCUSSED.

>> IT'S NOT GOING TO BE REOPENED?

>> TRENTON: I HAVEN'T THOUGHT ABOUT IT.

BUT IF IT'S AN ISSUE LET US KNOW AND WE WILL LOOK AT IT AT A POSSIBILITY. THAT'S EVERYTHING I HAD.

>> MEMBER ALTMAN: ALL RIGHT. ANY NEW BUSINESS?

[MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION]

ANNOUNCEMENTS? FROM MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION? ALL RIGHT. HEARING NONE I WILL ADJOURN THE MEETING

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.