[Call to Order, Invocation, and Pledge of Allegiance]
[2021-363]
[CONSENT AGENDA ]
[2021-376]
[2021-377]
[00:06:59]
SINCE THE PROPERTY IS AN EXTENSION OF PD 30 FOR THE
[00:07:01]
DESIGN ELEMENTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH OUR CONFERENCE OF PLAN.THE STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL.
ON JULY 20 THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST.
I WILL CONTINUE TO STAND FOR QUESTIONS.
>>CHAIRMAN: ANY QUESTIONS? DO WE HAVE A MOTION?
>> I MAKE A MOTION. >> EMOTION CARRIES 7 TO 0. ANY DISCUSSION? QUICK SMOKE TO APPROVE.
>> THE SECOND. >> PLEASE NOTE.
>> THE ITEM PASSES 7 TO 0. >>> OPEN ITEM 2021 Ã378.
[2021-378]
CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ACTIVE ORDINANCE EMITTING THE RELATION TO THE DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF APPROXIMATELY HUNDRED AND 68 ACRES.OUT OF THE AR USE AND SURVEY ABSTRACT 809 WM SERVICE EXTRAS 20 AND THE JR VOCAB SURVEY ABSTRACT 1201.
DESCRIBING EXHIBIT A. IT'S FOR RESIDENTIAL AND OFFICE FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED WEST OF LONGBRANCH ROAD AND THE DANIEL ROAD INTERSECTION. IT IS DIRECTLY NORTHWEST OF THE
MIDWAY REGIONAL AIRPORT. >>MAN: THE PROPOSED OF HIM AND YOU HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU WAS ORIGINALLY FOR THE AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT. THEY REQUESTED THE DISTRICT TO ALLOW FOR SINGLE RESIDENTIAL HOMES.
AS WELL AS OFFICE WAREHOUSE USES.
THE PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILY PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT IS LOCATED IN THIS GENERAL AREA. IT IS CONSISTING OF 165 RESIDENTIAL LOTS READING FROM 1200 FT.B2.
>> ALLOTS UP TO HALF AN ANCHOR .
ALSO CONSISTS OF EIGHT COMMON AREA SPACES AS WELL AS 55.4 ACRES. HOW THE OPEN SPACE IS BROKEN UP SHOWS A FLOOD PLAN AS WELL AS NON-FLOOD OPEN SPACE.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLAN TO VOMIT DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS THE PLANNED VOMIT DISTRICTS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE 5% OF OPEN SPACE WHICHEVER IS ER. THEY ARE EXCEEDING THE MINIMUM EQUIREMENTS. WHEN COMING UP WITH A PLAN DEVELOPMENT ONE THING THAT WE STRESS TO THE APPLICANT WAS IN THE REQUIREMENTS IT TALKS ABOUT HOW IT NEEDS TO BE UNIQUE AND DIFFERENT. IT NEEDS TO BUILD INTO THE TOPOGRAPHY. WE'RE TRYING TO GET AWAY FROM MONOTONOUS DEVELOPMENTS WHERE IT'S THE SAME THING.
THEY ARE VERY SIMILAR IN DESIGN.
IN ORDER TO DO THIS THE AMENITIES THAT THEY ARE REQUESTING IS TO USE THE TOPOGRAPHY AS AN AMENITY AND PRESERVE AS MANY TREES AS THEY CAN THROUGHOUT THE CITY.
THE TREES WILL BE USED ACCEPT THE DEVELOPMENT AND THE
[00:10:05]
FEATURES. THEY ARE ALSO ADDING ADDITIONAL TREES AND TREES IN THE FRONT YARD.THEY'RE MAINTAINING THE TRADITIONAL MAINSTREAM THE TRADITIONAL MAINSTREAM WALL. THEY'RE PRESERVING THE OPEN
SPACE. >> LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY IS A LAKE. THERE IS PARTIAL ACCESS TO THE LAKE AND THEY ARE FOCUSING A LOT OF THEIR HEIR AMENITIES AROUND THIS OUND THIS LAKE. THIS DEVELOPMENT IS BROKEN INTO MULTIPLE PHASES. PHASE 1, PHASE 2 AND THREE IN THE OFFICE WAREHOUSE. THE FIRST PHASE IS REQUIRED TO BE DEVELOPED IN THE BEGINNING. THEY WILL HAVE DEVELOPED ACCESS IN THE HAYES CROSSING PHASE 2. RIGHT NOW PHASE I IS NEAR COMPLETION FOR THE PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND THEY HAVE NOT YET STARTED HAYES CROSSING PHASE 2 SO THEY DON'T HAVE AXIS AT THIS POINT IN TIME TO PHASE 1. WHEN THEY DO DECIDE TO GO AHEAD AND CONSTRUCT THE OFFICE WAREHOUSE PORTION IS THAT REQUIRES HIM TO GO BACK BEFORE CITY COUNCIL TO REOPEN A EMBRYOS ELEVATION PLANS BEFORE YOU FOR FOR APPROVAL.
ONCE AGAIN THEY CAPTURE THE ESSENCE OF THE TOPOGRAPHY AND THEY WANTED TO AS YOU SEE IN THESE AREAS PRESERVE THE TREE PRESERVATION PORTION ON THEIR PLAN THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT WITH THE TRAIL THAT MEANDERS THROUGH IT.
IT IS UP UNTIL IT GOES INTO HAYES CROSSING THROUGH THE SIDEWALKS. THERE ARE COUPLE CHALLENGES WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT. ONCE AGAIN IT'S HIS ROAD HOWEVER THERE ARE MULTIPLE EASEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY REGARDING MAJOR POWER LINES, GAS LINES THAT DO IMPACT THE WAY IT'S DESIGNED AS YOU CAN SEE RIGHT HERE.
THEY DRIP THE PHASES AND AS THEY ARE TRYING THE DESIGN OF THE RESIDENTIAL LOTS. ONE THING THAT WE DID PROMOTE AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND THAT WE REALLY WANT TO FOCUS ON THE AMENITIES. ONE THING THAT WE SEE IN PREVIOUS BEAUTIES IS THAT THE AMENITIES ARE DONE AS THE DEVELOPMENT CONTINUES TO MOVE FORWARD.
A LOT OF TIMES WE DON'T SEE THE FINAL MENUS GOING IN UNTIL THE VERY END OF THE PROJECT. THIS PROJECT SHOWS THEY ARE DOING MOST OF THE AMENITIES THAT ARE AROUND THE LAKE AND THE VERY BEGINNING AS PART OF PHASE 1. THE MAJOR AMENITIES WILL BE DONE AS PART OF PHASE 1 AND IT GOES THROUGHOUT YOUR TO BE DONE IN PHASE 2 OR THREE. WE DID NOT KNOW THIS IS PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET.
THEY CAME BACK IN OPPOSITION AND THIS GOES BEFORE THE PLANE ZONING COMMISSION ON JULY 20. WE RECEIVED A SEVEN AND ZERO PNC. WE DO HAVE VIDEOS SHOWING SOME DRUM PLACES THAT THE APPLICANT DID TO SAY WHAT THE APPLICANT LOOKS LIKE. THIS IS DUE TO THE DIFFICULTY OF TRYING TO GET ACCESS BEFORE THE APPLICANT COMES UP TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AT
THIS TIME. >> IS THIS JUST EASE QUESTION.
>> YES IT IS. BRIDGEWATER IS THE CURRENT NAME AND ITS ECON. IT'S LOCATED DIRECTLY EAST OF THAT MIDWAY REGIONAL AIRPORT IS RIGHT HERE.
>> CAN WE TALK ABOUT THE OFFICE WAREHOUSE SPACE THAT'S GOING TO BE CUT A CORNER TO THE AIRPORT? WHAT IS STIPULATIONS WITH THAT? AND HE SAID IT HAVE TO COME BACK BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMITTEE.
IF WE GO AHEAD AND PUT IT IN P AND Z NOW FOR THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT WE WILL PROBABLY BE STUCK IN AN OFFICE WAREHOUSE IN THERE THAT IS RESIDENTIAL. WHY OFFICE WAREHOUSE?
>> THEY SERVE THE AIRPORT AND USES THAT THE AIRPORT GENERATES A HANGER. IT CAN BE ANYTHING THAT SUPPORTS THE AIRPORT AND WE BEEN TOLD TO ME APPLICANT THAT THEY CAN ANSWER IT IN MORE DEBT.
[00:15:03]
IT WILL BE COMING OUT AS AN ORDINANCE WHEN THIS COMES FORWARD TO BE DEVELOPED. YOU'LL BE ABLE TO SEE THE EXACT USE AND DESIGN OF THE BUILDINGS.>> FOR RIGHT NOW WHERE WE STAND IS TO SEE HER COMMUNITY.
>> HATRED AND CAN I JUST CUT IN HERE SO WE DON'T GO DOWN THAT IS NOT THE AIRPORT PROPERTY.
IT'S NOT TO BECOME AIRPORT PROPERTY.
WE SEE PERFECT TIMING ON THAT AND THAT'S THE AIRPORT MANAGER.
YOU CAN BUILD HANGERS THERE BECAUSE YOU CAN'T GET THROUGH THE FENCE. WHAT YOU WOULD SAY THERE IS REALLY THE BEST AND MOST APPROPRIATE USE FOR WHICH WOULD BE SUPPORT INDUSTRIES OCCUPYING CLOSEST TO THE AIRPORT WHICH WOULD SERVE AS A BUFFER FROM RESIDENTIAL BECAUSE TYPICALLY RESIDENTIAL AND AIRPORT DON'T GO TOGETHER.
THAT'S PROBABLY WITH THE APPLICANTS ARE GONNA SAY SHOULD
THEY COME UP. >> THERE'S NO WAY THEY WERE TO BE A HANGER THERE BUT WHAT YOU SEE IS PROFESSIONAL AND SOME KIND OF SPACE THAT WOULD SUPPORT THE AIRPORT INDUSTRY.
>> IS CURRENTLY RESIDENTIAL CRACKED? OR IS CURRENTLY AGRICULTURE. IT'S THAT FUTURE SECTION OF LAND USED TEAMS RESIDENTIAL WAREHOUSE.
>> IS WHOLE ENTIRE AREA RIGHT HERE HERE IS A CORPORATE MODULE . IT'S A PROFESSIONAL OFFICE AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES. MORE OF LIKE AN OFFICE AND CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS THAT YOU CAN SEE.
IT'S VERY LOW WAREHOUSE DISTRIBUTION USES.
>> IS IT HEALTHY? FOR OUR AIRPORT TO HAVE COMPETING WAREHOUSE SPACE JUST RAISE NEXT-DOOR? IS IT CAN CREATE SOME SORT OF ISSUES FOR THE FUTURE OF OUR
AIRPORT? >> I WOULD LEAVE THAT UP TO
THE AIRPORT MANAGER. >> AT ME TO DOMINATE THE CONVERSATION HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE TRAFFIC FLOW ON HIS ROAD WE CAN GET THERE AFTER.
>> HAVE THREE QUESTIONS AND YOU KINDA KNOCKED OUT ONE OF THEM. HE TALKED EARLIER ABOUT AMENITIES. I DIDN'T KNOW THIS WAS AN ISSUE UNTIL I HAVE SOME PEOPLE AND OTHER TOYS REACH OUT TO ME WHERE WE HAVE DEVELOPERS COME IN AND I PROMISE THESE AMENITIES IN THE PD AND THEN THEY GET GOING ON THE DEVELOPMENT AND THEY SELF NOTIFY THEMSELVES TO COME BACK TO CHANGE THE PD TO A LESSER STANDARD WHICH WAS PITCHED TO US. IS ANY TYPE OF WAY WE CAN SECURE THE STANDARD IN THIS PD SO YOU CAN QUIT GOING BACK AND
LOWERING THE STANDARD AFTER? >> I WOULD REFER THAT IS A
LEGAL QUESTION. >> THERE'S NO LEGAL WAY FOR
YOU TO UNIFY THE COUNCIL. >> I UNDERSTAND I THINK IT'S
UNFAIR. >> THERE ARE VARIOUS MEANS WITH PNC AND COUNCIL. WE BEEN LAYING THAT MESSAGE.
IT'S TO DEVELOPERS ABOUT PT FOR WHAT I'VE BEEN CALLING IT.
WE DO GET THESE GREAT PROJECTS COME IN AND A COUPLE MONTHS DOWN THE ROAD THEY CHANGED WE ARE DEFINITELY LETTING PEOPLE KNOW ABOUT THAT IN QUICKLY TO HAVE ONE MORE QUESTION.
>> THERE'S PHASE 1, TWO AND THREE.
PHASE I CAN BE DONE BECAUSE IT'S LESS THAN 34 HOMES BUT HOW IS PHASE 2 AND THREE GOING TO BE DONE WHEN THERE'S ONLY ONE
POINT TO ACCESS THAT? >> PHASE 2 AND THREE WILL BE LIMITED UNTIL HIS ROAD IS COMPLETE.
>> SO THEY CAN'T TILTED UNTIL HIS ROAD EXTENSIONS ARE GIVEN A
TWO POINT OF ACCESS. >> THAT'S CORRECT.
>> I JUST WANT TO PIGGYBACK ON THAT BECAUSE WE ARTIE TALKED
ABOUT IT. >> THAT'S A REALLY GOOD POINT.
I JUST WANT TO HIGHLIGHT THIS TO ME SEEMS VERY MUCH LIKE THE PD PROBLEMS AND THE DEVELOPMENT THAT ARE APPROVED IN THE PAST AND NOT WE ARE DEALING WITH SITUATIONS THAT ARE APPROVED AND NEVER LOOK BUILT ON. THIS SEEMS TO ME LIKE IF WE WERE TO APPROVE THIS TONIGHT AS PRESENTED THEY CAN EVEN START IF I'M CORRECT THEY CAN'T START BUILDING ON PHASE 1 UNTIL PHASE
[00:20:02]
2 OF THE NEIGHBORING SUBDIVISION IS COMPLETED WHICH HASN'T BEEN OFFICIALLY STARTED. THEY CANNOT COMPLETE TO PHASE 2 AND PHASE 3 OR THE INDUSTRIAL MIXED-USE SIDE OF THINGS UNTIL HIS ROAD COMES THROUGH THERE WHICH WOULD TAKE PRIVATE REAL ESTATE NEGOTIATIONS RIGHT AWAY TO MAKE THIS HAPPEN SO WE'RE ALMOST APPROVING A HYPOTHETICAL HUNT DOWN THE ROAD SITUATION.>> AM I GETTING THAT CORRECT? >> THE TIMING IS CORRECT YES.
>> ONE THING IS IT'S NOT FINISHED YET.
IT'S THE SAME DEVELOPER IS THE PROPERTY SO HE WON'T START THIS UNTIL HE FINISHES THE OTHER PART.
>> MISTER WEAVER'S EARS ON THE NORTH SIDE TO QUESTION MY.
>> NO IT'S DIFFERENT. >> YOU CAN'T START ANYTHING
UNTIL THAT'S FINISHED. >> THAT IS CORRECT.
>> MY NAME IS TERRY WEAVER FROM THE STYLING DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. I REPRESENT JOHN RAY AND CAROLINA TRUST, THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY.
>> YES I AGREE. WHEN YOU HAVE A LARGE TRACT OF LAND AND YOU HAVE MULTIPLE PHASES NOT EVERYTHING IS GOING TO START IMMEDIATELY. HOWEVER, WHEN YOU HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO USE YOUR CAPITAL TO ACQUIRE A PIECE OF LAND YOU'D LIKE TO KNOW THAT IT COULD BE USED EVEN IF IT TAKES A WHILE TO GET THERE. THAT'S WHY WE'RE ASKING FOR ZONING. WE STILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH PLANNING AND WE STILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH OTHER APPROVALS BUT IF WE DON'T KNOW WE CAN EVEN DO THESE THINGS AND IT'S DIFFICULT TO MAKE THAT CAPITAL DECISION. AS FAR AS HIS ROAD WHEN REASON WHY THE IMPROVEMENTS ARE BEING DONE DOWN IN 1387, CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG IS THAT WHEN I WAS RUNNING JOHN HOUSTON WERE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND WE ACQUIRED HAYES CROSSING, THAT'S WHY TED YOU THOUGHT I WAS HERE WE DID A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BEFORE WE STARTED PLANNING AFTER WE REZONED TO CONTRIBUTE SIZABLE FUNDS TOWARDS AND IMPROVING HIS ROAD.
WE BUILT THIS OUT TO GO IN AND WORK WITH THE HAYES FAMILY WHO OWNS THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH OF US OR THE HAYES COLLECTOR CURRENTLY TO THE SOUTHERN END OF THEIR NORTHERN PROPERTY SO THE NEXT LEG IS THROUGH THEIR PROPERTY IF WE PUT THE PLAN IT WOULD HELP EVEN THOUGH THIS DRAWING IS PRETTY NICE.
>> HE'S CROSSING IS UP THERE IN A GRAY AREA.
THAT'S THE SECOND PHASE IS GETTING READY TO START.
JOHN HOUSTON ASSISTING THE START AND THERE.
VIRTUALLY HAYES ROAD IS ARTIE THERE ABOVE WHERE IT SAYS PLAN.
TWO LINES OF IT AND IT'S IMPROVED.
HE TO HAVE ACCOUNTING GAP ALONG TWIN CREEKS.
IT WENT FROM 1387 TO TWIN CREEKS.
THERE'S NO REASON WHY HAYES ROAD CAN BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE. ALSO ON THE PLAN THERE'S A ROAD THAT COMES OFF NORTH OF THE AIRPORT THAT TIES INTO HIS ROAD. THAT ROAD IS ON CITY PROPERTY POSSIBLY NOW AND WE CAN HAVE DISCUSSIONS ON THAT.
YOU CAN WORK OUT THE DECISION DECISIONS RELATED TO THAT I WILL ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT ROADWAYS AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS AT THIS TIME BECAUSE I LIKE TO MOVE ON TO SOME OTHER ANSWERS HERE IN A MOMENT.
>> THE OTHER PROPERTY IS THAT YOUR STEW?
>> THAT STILL OWNED BY ROMAN HIGHS AND DIANA HAYES AS PART OF THE OLD AREA. I WILL TELL YOU THIS.
IT'S UNDER CONTRACT RIGHT NOW AS OF LAST WEEK.
>> THE PROPERTY IS UNDER CONTRACT ALSO.
[00:25:08]
>> THERE'S A LOT OF EMPHASIS OUT THERE AND A LOT OF MOMENTUM FOR THIS AREA. THEY ARE NOT BEING FIXED AT OTHER AIRPORTS. THEY DON'T HAVE ROOM AND THEREFORE TO THAT RIGHT NOW SO WOULD BE OFFICE WAREHOUSE AND IT IS LOWRISE. WHAT HAPPENS HERE IS WHAT WE LEAVE 31 ACRES THERE AND WE HAVE TO.
THERE IS AN AIRPORT ORDINANCE PASSED BY THE CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN THAT YOU CAN PUT RESIDENTIAL HERE.
IT HAS TO BE BUFFERED WHICH MAKES GREAT SENSE FOR THE OFFICE WAREHOUSE. IT'S GONNA BE A NICE PROFESSIONAL ON 31 ACRES IN THE FUTURE THAT MAY BE AIRPORT RELATED AND IT MAY NOT. ONCE THE COLLECTORS PUNCH DOWN TO THE AIRPORT ROAD AND GETS TO 287 YOU JUST OPENED UP A TREMENDOUS PACKAGE OUT HERE FOR THE CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN.
INCLUDING THE BRIDGEWATER PROPERTY AND THEN YOU HAVE MORE PROPERTY DOWN ONTO 87. THEY HAVE PROPERTY ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE AIRPORT. I THINK THIS CAN BE A LOT OF CONVERSATIONS OVER THE NEXT TWO OR THREE WEEKS WITH THE CITY AND AIRPORT TALKING ABOUT THIS. RIGHT NOW I DON'T THINK THERE IS ONE QUALITY AND YOU HAVE TO TO FIND QUALITY.
OFFICE WAREHOUSE WITH LOTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN RIGHT NOW. REPORTS A DIFFERENT ANIMAL.
IT'S NOT LIKE YOU GUYS CAN BUY 3 ACRES AND PUT HIS BUSINESS AND REPORT. HE WILL HEAR.
AND SO WHEN HAYES IS DEVELOPED THEY WILL HAVE TO BE BUFFER.
THERE'S ANOTHER PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNERSHIP NORTH OF THEIR THERE'S A LOT OF MOMENTUM RIGHT NOW FOR THE OFFICE WAREHOUSE. WE ARE DOING IS CREATE THIS FOR A NICE LARGER LOT. THE LOTS ARE LARGER THAN WHAT'S IN HIS CROWNING AND BUFFERED TO GET DOWN HERE.
WE WANT TO USE THAT FOR LANE COLLECTOR IN THAT GREEN SPACE THAT WILL BE OUR BUFFER FROM THE RESIDENTIAL TO THE LOWRISE OFFICE WAREHOUSE. THEY CAN NEIGHBOR UP TO EACH OTHER IT HAPPENS MANY TIMES. WHEN SEALS COME IN TO TALK ABOUT ZONING AND PLANNING IT'S GONNA BE THE SAME CONVERSATION.
MORE LIKELY THEY'RE GONNA PUT IT ON THE WEST SIDE AND PUT OFFICE WAREHOUSE ON THE EAST SIDE BECAUSE OF THE AIRPORT OVERLAY. I TALKED TO PHILIP FROM THE AIRPORT AND WE CAN HAVE OUR BUILDERS DO A DISCLOSURE.
WE'VE HAD THE SAME DISCLOSURE IN EVERY DEVELOPMENT THAT SOLD OUT. YOU JUST NOTIFY THEM UP FRONT.
WE WILL HAVE ANY CHILEAN THERE. IT'S AN ANSWER TO COUNCILMAN WICKMAN'S QUESTION. THERE GUYS OUT THERE THAT DON'T DO WHAT THEY SAY. IT HAPPENS EVERY DAY.
WE ARE MARKING A PLAN TO MAKE OURSELVES DIFFERENT ON PURPOSE BECAUSE WE DON'T WANT TO COMPETE AGAINST BRIDGEWATER.
I APPRECIATE YOU LOOKING. >> SINCE YOU COULD BE DELAYED ON YOUR FACE TO IN PHASE 32 MONTHS AND TWO YEARS BECAUSE OF OTHER PEOPLE AND THE INTEREST RATES ARE GOING UP DURING THE SELECTION HOW MUCH OF THE AMENITY PROCESS ARE YOU GOING TO HAVE DONE WHEN YOU TWO PHASE 1?
>> IT'S LISTED IN THERE WE'RE GONNA PUT IN THE PICNIC PAVILION DOWN BY THE LAKE WITH A BARBECUE AREA.
WE WILL PUT IN JUST THE BEGINNING OF THE 8 FOOT TRAIL ON THE WESTERN END AND WE WILL PUT IN THE PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
FOR THREE GROUPS. >> ARE PRETTY MUCH THE
[00:30:01]
AMENITIES ARE HOOKED TO THE PURPLE ONE WHICH WILL BE DONE.>> WE WANT TO SET THE TONE. >> I UNDERSTAND.
>> WILL BE ASKING MORE FOR LOTS PER SQUARE FOOT IN FRONT
OF IT THAN ANYBODY IN TOWN. >> IT'S JUST THE STEEL TRUCKS AND EVERYTHING COMING THROUGH THAT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO BUILD UP BEFORE YOU GET TO PHASE 2 OR THREE.
>> I THINK IT'S A NICE TRANSITION FROM THE CORPORATE MODULE AREA TO DO THIS WITH LARGER LOTS.
>> EVERYTHING I HAVE IS 90 FOOT PLUS.
>> I JUST THE PICTURE. I COULDN'T FIND THE LEGEND TO
SEE HOW THEY WERE. >> IT'S BUILT OUT.
EVERY LOT IS 90 FOOT PLUS. THERE'S NO FRONT ENTRY OR ADJACENT GARAGE. EVERYTHING UP ON THE NOVEL UP
THERE IS HIGH FIGURE OR CLASS. >> I HAVE THAT AERIAL UP ON THAT DRONE TO LET YOU SEE THE FLAVOR OF THE PROPERTY AND HOW WE'RE GOING TO MAINTAIN MOST OF THAT.
>> I DON'T HAVE AN ISSUE WITH THE ACTUAL DEVELOPMENT I THINK IT'S A GOOD PLAN. THIS IS ANYTHING YOU CONSULT THE WE CURRENTLY HAVE IS A MAJOR ISSUE AT HAYES IN 1387.
SO MUCH SO THAT THE CITY'S POSITION TO PUT A LIGHT AT 1387 BUT DIDN'T QUALIFY. NOW I UNDERSTAND THE TRAFFIC COUNTS HAVE TO BE THERE BEFORE IT WILL QUALIFY AND THAT THIS WILL DEFINITELY ADD TO THAT BUT FOR THOSE RESIDENTS THAT ARE LIVING ON HIS ROAD NOW WITH THE ADDITION OF THAT JOHN HOUSTON DEVELOPMENT THAT'S BEING BUILT OUT AS WE SPEAK THOSE GUYS YOU GOT LONG BRANCH ELEMENTARY. GO RIGHT ANY OF HERITAGE HIGH SCHOOL IF YOU GO LEFT. THEY'RE SITTING AT THAT STOP SIGN FOR A LONG TIME AND THERE'S A MAJOR TRAFFIC BACKUP FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND. ESPECIALLY EARLY IN THE
MORNING. >> WE WOULD HAVE TO ADDRESS ANY TRAFFIC ISSUES OR IMPACT STUDIES.
WE ARE TWO YEARS OUT. 18 MONTHS FROM COMING IN WITH OUR FIRST PLOT. WE ARE 24 MONTHS FROM THE FIRST HOUSE BEING OUT THERE BUT IT'S PROBABLY 30 MONTHS.
THE LONG-TERM ANSWER IS GETTING HIS ROAD TO 287.
SET YOUR PEOPLE WERE. >> DID YOU BUY IT?
>> I BUY WHAT? >> THAT SECTION OF ROAD TO BUT
THAT WROTE IN? >> I HAVE AN INVESTOR THAT HAS IT UNDER CONTRACT WHICH IS THE START.
>> LIKE I SAID I HEARD TODAY HE SAID IT WAS PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE AND THEY WILL BE HERE SOON. SOMEBODY JUST BOUGHT 290 ACRES
FROM THE FAMILY TRUST. >> THE PROBLEM IS GOING TO GET
AMPLIFIED BEFORE IT GETS FIXED. >> MIKE COULD YOU HOW FAR OFF WE WERE FROM GETTING THE SIGNAL AT THAT STOP SIGN? OR DID THEY EVEN GIVE YOU THAT INFORMATION?
>> I'M SURE YOU GUYS GET THE SAME EMAILS I DO.
IF YOU DON'T YOU PROBABLY WILL NEXT WEEK WHEN SCHOOL STARTS
ABOUT THAT INTERSECTION. >> WE ACTUALLY CAN CONTINUE TO PETITION AND LOOK AT THAT INTERSECTION.
WHAT THEY END UP DOING IS THEY HAD NINE DIFFERENT WARRANTS ANALYSIS AND THEY LOOKED AT TRIGGERS THAT DIDN'T MEET ANYONE OF THOSE. TYPICALLY THEY LOOK AND GO THROUGH SUCH A PRETTY DETAILED PROCESS AND THERE ARE SOME AREAS WHERE THEY MET BUT YOU NEED TO HAVE EIGHT HOURS AND ONE OF THEM WITH A NUMBER OF TRIPS BOTH ON HAYES AND 1387.
IT'S GETTING CLOSE AND I THINK WHEN YOU ADD ANY ADDITIONAL TRIPS THAT WILL COME FROM HIS CROSSING AND KIND OF WHAT WE SEE OUT THERE IS NOTHING THING THAT WE CAN'T CONTEND SHE WAS CONTINUE TO LOOK INTO THIS ONE ANALYSIS AND AT SOME POINT IT DEFINITELY WILL MEET THAT WARRANT.
>> I THINK THOSE OF THE PROPER STEPS THAT WE AS A COUNCIL GET ACCUSED OFTEN OF APPROVING PROJECTS WITHOUT INFRASTRUCTURE BEING IN PLACE AND THIS TO ME IS A PRIME EXAMPLE.
IT'S NOTHING AGAINST YOU OR YOUR DEVELOPMENT BUT IT'S JUST WHERE WE ARE AND THAT PART OF MIDLOTHIAN AND IS ABOUT THAT
[00:35:02]
ARE COMING IN. >> I KNOW THERE'S TWO WAYS IN AND OUT ON THE STREET BUT EVERYONE GOES TOWARDS THE
SCHOOLS AND IT'S BACKED UP. >> LIKE TERRY SAID IT CAN BE TWO YEARS BEFORE FELT THE FIRST HOUSE.
>> HAS CUT A LOT OF TIME BETWEEN PEOPLE THAT LIVE IN THE
DEVELOPMENT. >> DOES THE HAYES ROAD TIE IN TO THE AIRPORT ROAD DOWN ON 287 ORCHARD WHICH IS CLOSER TO THE
CHURCH. >> I RATHER HAVE THE CITY
ENGINEER ANSWER THAT. >> I BELIEVE WE COME BACK IN
DO THAT. >> IS NOT DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY DONE EITHER FOR THE EXTENSION IS NOT BEING WORKED ON.
I KNOW WE ARE NOT LOOKING AT IT.
>> DEPENDING HOW THAT TIES IN WITH OUT FRONTAGE ROAD ALONG 287 IT'S GREAT TO HAVE BUT IF WE BRING EVERYTHING TO THE MAIN OF 287 THERE'S ALSO SAFETY AND TRAFFIC CONCERN THAT WE WOULD HAVE IF YOU BRING THAT TRAFFIC TO THE SOUTH.
>> ADVANTAGE TO KNOW IF WE TIED IT INTO THE AIRPORT OR NOT
MAY BE IMPROVED. >> IT'S THROUGH ELLIS COUNTY AND THE ISSUES CAN IT BE THAT ACCORDING TO TEX.
IT'S A 10 TO 15 YOUR PLAN IS NOT TO BE ANYTIME SOON AT LEAST
FROM WHAT WE'VE HEARD. >> THAT REDLINE IS LONELY.
>> WE DO SO WHEN IT COMES TO 287 THAT ULTIMATELY TIED INTO
287 WHERE WE CURRENTLY SHOW IT. >> IT'S FURTHER SOUTH.
>> THAT'S IMPORTANT FOR US TO. WE GET TO MARKET OUR DEVELOPMENT AND WE HAVE TO HAVE ACCESS TO IT.
THOSE ARE THINGS THAT WE DID WITH THE DUE DILIGENCE PHASE.
>> THINK YOU I APPRECIATE YOU HEARING ME.
>> DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
>> WILL SOMEONE PLEASE MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC
>> THE OPEN SESSION IS NOW CLOSED.
>> THE POINTS I MADE EARLIER I DO THINK IT'S A GOOD PLAN.
I UNDERSTAND THAT WE ARE YEARS OUT FROM IT I JUST WANTED TO BE ON RECORD THAT WE ARE AWARE OF THE TRAFFIC ISSUES AT 1387 AND HIS ROAD. I DON'T KNOW THAT WE CAN AND I'M THE ONE THAT MADE THE ARGUMENT BUT I DON'T KNOW THAT I CAN JUSTIFY PUNISHING THIS DEVELOPER BECAUSE OF TRAFFIC/INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUES THAT WE HAVE GOING ON.
>> MY ONLY COMMENT IS I'M ALWAYS STICKING TO WHAT'S IN THE PRESENTATION WHAT'S WRITTEN ON THE PAPER WITH IT ON THE RECORD. AS THE APPLICANT STATED SURE THIS LAND MAY BE COMING UP UNDER CONTRACT BUT IT'S NOT RIGHT NOW. I JUST SEE TOO MANY THINGS UP IN THE AIR TO ARBITRARILY LOCKDOWN THE SUCCESS OF WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT. BASED ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF LAND THAT NEITHER THE APPLICANT NOR THE CITY OWNS AT THIS TIME.
I DON'T SEE HOW WE COULD BE LOOKING AT THIS AND INTERPRETING BASED ON THINGS THAT WE CANNOT CONTROL SO I DON'T KNOW HOW I CAN SUPPORT IT.
US OR THE APPLICANT. >> DO WE HAVE A MOTION.
>> I MOVED TO APPROVE. >> SECOND.
[00:40:03]
>> WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE AND A SECOND PLEASE VOTE.
>> IT'S FOR NOW. >> OF CHOICE FOR THOSE IN
FAVOR SAY AYE. >> AND HE OPPOSED?
THE ITEM PASSES 6 TO 1. >> OPEN ITEM 2021 Ã379.
[2021-379]
CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT AND USE REGULATIONS OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 69 IS ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NUMBER 201 FOUR Ã26 AND AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NUMBER 202 ONE Ã43. ADOPTING A SITE PLAN, ELEVATIONS AND LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR LOT 2, BLOCK B OF MIDLOTHIAN BUSINESS PARK. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF US HIGHWAY 67 BETWEEN MILLER ROAD ANDDISCOVERY STREET. >> THANK YOU MAYOR.
THE AMENDMENT SOUGHT BY THE APPLICANT INCLUDES FOUR ITEMS. THE ARTICULATION ON TOP OF THE BUILDING, ARTICULATION OF THE ENTRANCE AREA AND THEN APPROACHING AN EXISTING EASEMENT AND ADOPTING A NEW SITE PLAN.
THE PD DOES STATE THAT IN NO CASE DOES IT EXTEND FOR MORE THAN 50 FEET WITHOUT INCORPORATING A VERTICAL OFFSET. SINCE THE PACKING WAS DISTRIBUTED TO THE COUNCIL THE APPLICANT HAS ALTERED THIS DESIGN AND NOW ADHERES TO THE 50 FOOT REQUIREMENT AND DISTANCE THAT REQUIRES THAT 2 FOOT OFFSET.
WHAT WE DO WANT TO ASK STAFF TO DO IS DISREGARD THAT PARTICULAR AMENDMENT REQUEST. YOU'LL SEE THAT AS A FIRST REQUEST. AS WELL AS IN THE ORDINANCES LOCATED UNDER SECTION 8. THE APPLICANT DOES CHOOSE TO DO A SELECTION OF NUMBER ONE AND NUMBER FOUR.
NUMBER FOUR DOES STATE THAT THE CLOTTING IS FOR THE ENTIRE FEATURE MINUS THE DOORS AND THE WINDOW OPENING.
THE AFRICAN IS ACTUALLY ASKING TO DO A WAINSCOT OF THAT FORM LETTER ON THE BOTTOM SIDE. THEY'RE HAVING A MAJOR SETBACK FOR THIS PARTICULAR AREA. IT'S PROPOSED TO BE OR IS SLATED TO BE A 30 FOOT WIDE. IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE THE APPLICANT IS ASKING TO REDUCE THAT DOWN TO 26 WHICH STILL MEETS THE FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS.
THE NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED BY THE CURRENT ORDINANCE IS NOT BEING AFFECTED BY THIS REQUEST.
IN ADDITION TO THAT WITH THAT I WILL GET YOU TO STAND FOR QUESTIONS. IT'S THE IDEA THAT THE PD'S ARE CREATED AND THEN WE HAVE FOLKS COMING BACK WANTING TO DO LESS.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON THIS IS ACTUALLY DENIAL.
WE FIGURE STICK WITH THE PD AT THE TIME IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DIDN'T NECESSARILY HAVE AN ISSUE WITH THE ENCROACHMENT. THEY DIDN'T HAVE TOO MUCH OF AN ISSUE WITH THE ACTUAL LEAN BUT THEY DID HAVE AN ISSUE WITH GOING AWAY FROM ANY OF THE ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES THAT ARE TYPICALLY REQUIRED. FOR INSTANCE THE VERTICAL
ARTICULATION. >> WHEN WE PROVE THIS WHEN THEY CAME TO DIVIDE THE PROPERTY AND WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THE FRONT ROW IS THE BEST AND NOT DEVELOPMENT
[00:45:04]
BECAUSE IT BLOCKS THE BATTLE BUILDING BEHIND IT.IF THE ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL AND THAT'S WHY WE WENT WITH THE HIGHER STANDARDS AND ARTICULATION FOR THAT FUND.
IT MAKES IT LOOK BETTER FROM THE ROAD.
>> ORIGINALLY HE DIDN'T WANT ANY ARTICULATION OF THAT 125 BUT NOW HE'S BACK TO WHERE WE WANTED HIM TO BE.
>> THEY ALSO BROUGHT UP THAT IF WE DO IT HERE WHAT'S TO STOP THE NEXT LOT FROM ASKING THE SAME THING?
>> AFTER THE CHANGES IN EVERYTHING I'M SORRY DIDN'T MEAN TO BREAK IT. ARE YOU OKAY WITH THE WAY IT IS TODAY? OR DO YOU STILL WANT THEM TO DO AND NOT HAVE THE ENCOURAGEMENT QUESTION THE.
>> WE WANT THEM TO JUST FOLLOW THE PD.
>> IN OTHER WORDS THE STAFF RECOMMENDS RIGHT NOW TO DENY
THAT AS IT COMES OUT. >> EVEN WITH THE CHANGE?
>> IS CORRECT. >> WHAT ELSE BESIDES THE ENCROACHMENT DEFINED UNACCEPTABLE?
>> ALL OF THE THE REQUEST. >> I THOUGHT YOU COULD
DELINEATE THE POINT. >> GOING BACK TO THE TWO FUTURE REQUIREMENT THEY HAVE FOUR OPTIONS.
THEY ONLY WANT TO MEET ONE AND THE FOURTH ONE IS A DIFFERENT SUGGESTION THAT WE JUST FIGURE MEET BOTH YOU HAVE FOUR OPTIONS. IT'S A DISSOLUTION WAREHOUSE AT THE SHELL BUILDING BUT IT IS FOR DISTRIBUTION.
WE REALLY WANT TO MAXIMIZE THAT PARTICULAR AREA YOU CAN SEE HOW WE HAVE THE TRAILERS ON THE NORTH SIDE AND BY PUSHING THAT BUILDING UP AND HAVING THAT PARKING ALONG 67 YOU DEFINITELY HAVE A LOT MORE SPACE FOR TURNING.
>> I'VE BEEN COMMUNICATING WITH THE APPLICANT TO THE DELAY IN GETTING HERE. I'M KYLE FROM THE MIDLOTHIAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. IT IN PART SHOWS OUR UNDERSTANDING WHEN THIS WENT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THERE WAS AN INITIAL VOTE TO APPROVE BASED ON THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT AND THAT ULTIMATELY WAS THREE PEOPLE FOR IT AND FOR AGAINST. THE NEXT VOTE WAS A COMPROMISE THAT THEY BROUGHT FORWARD TODAY WHICH IS THE SAME THREE PEOPLE THAT THEY VOTED WITH THE DEVELOPER.
IN SPEAKING WITH THE APPLICANT THEY ARE RECOMMENDING TO FOLLOW THE DIRECTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND TO DO THEIR PROPOSAL AS IT MOVES FORWARD.
AS WE WORK THROUGH THIS PROJECT THERE IS ALSO THE MIDLOTHIAN BOARD THAT LOOKS AT THIS AS WELL AS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION. ULTIMATELY WE TOOK TO THE ORGANIZATION A PROPOSAL THAT WAS EVEN LESS REQUIREMENTS.
>> THEIR BUILDINGS THAT WOULD ATTRACT THE TYPE OF COMPANY COMPANIES THAT WERE LOOKING FOR.
AS FAR AS THE FINE DETAILS AND THE PIECES THEY WERE SUBJECTIVE AND THAT'S WERE ULTIMATELY THE APPLICANT NOW IS COMING FORWARD DOING WITH THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION HAS AND WHAT THE RECOMMENDATION WAS. I WILL SAY AS FAR AS THE REALIGNMENT AND ENDEAVOR WHICH IS A PRIVATE ACCESS DRIVE IT WAS ONE OF THE ISSUES THAT CAME UP BY A BOARD MEMBER THAT SAID
[00:50:03]
BOTH THE BOARD AND PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION.THE MAIN CONCERN IS THAT WE STILL HAVE SAFETY OF BEING ABLE TO SERVICE THOSE FACILITIES. ULTIMATELY THAT CASCADES INTO THE ULTIMATE SHAPE AND A REQUIREMENT OF THE BUILDING THAT WILL BE BUILT SO IT IS A NECESSITY TO BE ABLE TO USE AS
MUCH IS THAT AREA. >> THERE ADDING ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE AREA AS A TRADE FROM THERE.
ULTIMATELY BOTH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BORDERS ARE IN SUPPORT OF THIS PROJECT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
>> CHAIRMAN: ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR KYLE?
DO WE HAVE A MOTION? >> I MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE A
PUBLIC HEARING. >> PLEASE SECOND THAT AND
DISCUSSION PLEASE? >> I CAN'T THINK OF A BETTER
USE FOR PROPERTY. >> I THINK THE APPLICANT TOOK THE INPUT AND MADE THE MOST OF THE REQUESTED CHANGES.
IF WE ARE ULTIMATELY SHOWING THE HIGHEST CONCERN WITH THE ENCROACHMENT WITH THE LANDSCAPE OFFER DO WE WANT TO DENY THE WHOLE THING FOR 1300 FT.B2? I DON'T SEE IT THAT'S MY QUESTION IN AND THAT'S WHAT I GOT.
>> I FOLLOW WHAT YOU SAY AND I DON'T THINK THEY'RE GOING TO GIVE UP A MULTIMILLION DOLLAR DEAL OVER 1380 FT.B2 OF PARKING SO THE PARKING CAN DISAPPEAR AND THEN I CAN WALK AWAY.
I DON'T THINK THE EXTRA BENEFIT OF THE PRETTINESS OUTSIDE OF THAT BUILDING WILL BE WALKED AWAY FROM EITHER.
THAT'S JUST MY OPINION BECAUSE THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT MILLIONS OF DOLLARS FOR WAREHOUSING SO I THINK WE SHOULD STICK TO WHAT WE DO AND LEAVE IT AS IS. IT'S TONIGHT IS PRESENTED IN
THEM COME BACK AND FIX IT. >> IMAGES BE CONFUSED ON SOMETHING WERE TALKING ABOUT PANSIES RECOGNITION TO THE
STAFF? >> WERE JUST MAKING SURERE.
>> I FILLED THE FIRST THOUGH AND PASS THE SECOND.
THEY DIDN'T SEE THE 50 FOOT ARTICULATION.
>> THAT IS CORRECT THAT'S A LITTLE BIT OF THE CHANGE.
>> I KNOW MEET THE ARTICULATION STANDARDS IN THE
PD SO THEY FIX THAT ISSUE. >> JUST THIS ONE SHOULD APPEAR ON THE SCREEN RIGHT NOW. THEY DID MEET THE VERTICAL FLAT WALL ARTICULATION BY MAKING THAT CHANGE.
THEY'RE STILL SHORT ON THE OTHER TWO ITEMS THAT ARE LISTED IN THE TABLE AND YOUR STAFF REPORT AND THAT'S WHERE THEY'RE
TRYING TO SEEK SOME RELIEF. >> JUST TO GO BACK A LITTLE BIT OVER THE DETAILS. I DID GO AND WATCH SO I KINDA SEE HOW THIS EVOLVED. MY ONLY QUESTION IS THIS IS KIND OF DIFFERENT IN SOME OF THE THINGS WE'VE SEEN, FOR US AND THAT THESE ARE MULTITENANT SPACES AND THEY ARE SMALLER
[00:57:12]
>> WE ALSO NEED TO MAKE A MOTION BASED ON THE POOREST
COURTS DECISION. >> IT IS IN A DIFFERENT
MATERIAL. >> IS NOT A MATERIAL.
>> IN THIS CASE IS JUST NOT ENOUGH.
>> BUT IT DOESN'T MEAN IS YOU ONLY HAVE OUTSTANDING PORTION REALLY THAT WHOLE SEGMENT NEEDS TO BE DONE.
>> IF YOU SAID HE WANTS TO THOSE IN NEED TO STAND THAT
WHOLE THING. >> JUST BUT HE KNOWS WHAT HE'S TALKING ABOUT IT SWS FAY WAS FORMALIZED.
>> IS THE CONTIGUITY OF WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT WHAT YOU'RE THINKING ABOUT IT'S DONE TOP TO BOTTOM.
>> TO SEE NO I DID NOBODY KNEW WHAT A FORM LETTER WAS BUT THAT'S A REALLY GOOD EXAMPLE IN THE BEST ONE I'VE EVER SEEN.
>> NUMBER THREE YOU HAVE TO PUT BEACH DON'T OR SOMETHING ELSE ON THERE. THAT MIGHT BRING A BACKUP.
WHAT YOU HAVE RIGHT NOW IS NOTHING LIKE I WAS OUT HERE.
YOU HAVE ON THE BACK AND THAT'S GOOD.
WE HAVE ROOM FOR THE TRUCKS BACK THERE.
[01:00:24]
>> WE MAKE THEM DO ONE OF FOUR THINGS PLUS EVERYTHING FROM
FOUR. >> THEY GET TO DO TWO OF THE FOUR. THEY HAVE TO CHOOSE TWO OF THE
FOUR. >> RIGHT NOW THEY'RE JUST DOING ONE AND IT'S A VERY LIMITED AMOUNT.
>> THEY GO TO NUMBER FOUR IS A ONE ITEM.
>> I MAKE A MOTION IF WE ARE READY.
>> ARE WE REQUIRING THEM TO DO NUMBER THREE? WE ARE SAYING WERE TO GIVE THEM THE ENCROACHMENT RIGHT AWAY IN
RETURN FOR THAT. >> IT WILL STICK EXACTLY WITH
IT. >> DO I HAVE A MOTION QUICK
STORY OKAY WITH THAT? >> I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE STICK WITH THE PDF OFTEN ENCROACHMENTS.
>> WE HAVE A MOTION. >> SECOND.
>> I JUST WANT TO CONFIRM THAT INCLUDES A 50 FOOT ARTICULATION
STILL IN ITS OVER THE 50 FOOT. >> AND WE CAN CHANGE THE
ROADWAY. >> ARE WE OKAY WITH THAT?
>> THE FIRST AND THE SECOND? DO WE HAVE A MOTION?
>> THE ITEM PASSES 7 TO 0. >> REGULAR AGENDA, ITEM 2021 Ã
[2021-380]
380. CONSIDER AND ACT UPON AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MCNULTY IN TEXAS AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 201 SIX Ã49, ADOPTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 13 TWO 2016 ADOPTING MONTHLY WATER AND WASTEWATER RATES TO BE CHARGED FOR RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND WHOLESALE CUSTOMER BY AMENDING EXHIBIT A TITLED WATER WASTEWATER UTILITY RATES BY PROVIDING NEW RATES FOR SET CUSTOMERS BEGINNING OCTOBER 1 2021 THROUGH 2026.PROVIDING REPEALING CLAWS, PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE . >> ON JULY TO 13 THE COUNCIL RECEIVED A PRESENTATION FROM WILL BE FINANCIAL SERVICESS IN REGARDS TO AN UPDATED RATE STUDY ON THE WATER RATES.
AT THAT TIME THE RATES WERE LOOKED AT OVER A FIVE-YEAR PERIOD IN THE DIRECTION STAFF RECEIVED FROM SEL.
MIRRORS ON WHAT PROVIDED AND ON THE 13TH.
THE FIVE-YEAR PLAN. >> IT WOULD COME BACK TO
[01:05:05]
COUNSEL WITH ANY CHANGES BUT IF COUNCIL ADOPTED TONIGHT IT WOULD BE SET FOR THE FIVE YEARS.I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
[2021-381]
>> WE HAVE A MOTION. >> THE MOTION PASSES 7 TO 0.
>>> ITEM 2 OWES IT TO ONE Ã 381.
CONSIDER DISCUSSING AND TAKING A REPORT RECORD VOTE TO PROPOSE AN AD VALOREM TAX RATE OF POINT 675 DOLLARS AND SCHEDULING A MEETING TO ADOPT THE AD VALOREM TAX RATE OF SUBTYPE OR SEVEN
2021. >> YOU SHOULD BE HANDED A SEAT THAT HAS RED NUMBERS ON IT. I MENTIONED EARLIER IN THE WORKSHOPOF THE TAX OFFICE HAS INCORRECTLY PUT IN A VALUE AND SO WE HAD TO CHANGE THE ATION. IT DOESN'T CHANGE THE RECORD D VOTE. IT 67 AND A HALF CENTS WHICH IS STILL THE MAX RATE THAT WE ARE ADOPTING AND SETTING.
HOWEVER YOU WILL SEE THAT SOME OF THE OTHER NUMBERS FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS IS THE SPLIT OF THAT 67 AND A WITH THAT . WITH THAT ON THE PUBLIC AND WILL BE OCTOBER 7 ON THE TAX RATE WHICH WILL BE THE DATE OF THE APPROVAL ALSO.
WE HAVE A RECORD VOTE ON THE 67 AND A HALF CENTS.
YOU CAN GO ABOVE THAT RATE WITHOUT STIRRING THE PROCESS OVER WITH THAT I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
>> YOU AUTOMATICALLY GO TO THE RIGHT HIRE.
>> WE DON'T HAVE TO GO FOR THE BOAT.
>> DO WE JUST HAVE TO PROVE THE RATE OR DO WE NEED TO
APPROVE THE RATE AND THE DATE? >> BASICALLY WILL BE TAKING A RECORD VOTE TO APPROVE THE 67 AND HALF CENTS AND SCHEDULED A PUBLIC HEARING FOR SEPTEMBER 7 SO IF SOMEBODY WOULD BE WILLING TO MAKE MOTION THAT WILL BE GREAT.
>> I WILL MAKE THE MOTION. >> SECOND.
>> AS PRESENTED THE AD VALOREM TAX RATE OF $.675 IS SET TO BE
VOTED ON SEPTEMBER 7, 2001. >> WILL VOTEOTE.
>> THE MOTION PASSES. >>> AT THIS TIME WE WOULD TURN TO THE EXECUTIVE SESSION TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING ITEMS. SECTION 551.072 REAL ESTATE ON THE SOUTH WALNUT GROVE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE 301 W. AVENUE PROPERTY IN THE REAL PROPERTY ON 211 W. AVENUE F
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.