Oct 11, 2022 City Council

[00:03:27]

THIS IS A CITY HALL LIBRARY. WE HAVE THE BUDGET, SO WHEN THIS WAS APPROVED YEARS AGO, WHEN OUT FOR 25 YEARS AGO.

THAT IS WHAT WAS APPROVED. REAL QUICK I WILL GET THROUGH.

LOOK AT THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION.

CONSTRUCTION BUILDING ONLY. LOOKING AT 27.9 WILLIAM.

FOUR WALLS AND INTERIOR OF THAT.

NOTHING OUTSIDE, NO AT&T PARKING LOT, STRICTLY THE BUILDING. WE HAVE BESIDE ACQUISITION, A MILLION ESTIMATED IN BOND PROJECT.

COMING UP TO ABOUT 1.9. TWO BUILDINGS BE PURCHASED ACROSS THE STREET. ONCE WE GET INTO THE SITE INFRASTRUCTURE, TYPE LETTER A AND TYPE B FUNDS THE TYPE WE WILL LOOK AT. LOOKING AT LANDSCAPING, SIDEWALKS, RAMPS, THE PAVERS, THE STREET SURROUNDING THOSE THINGS. THIS IS A BREAKOUT WHERE WE'RE LOOKING AT. THIS IS THE BUILDING, FOUR WALLS WITHIN THE BUILDING, THE $27.98 MILLION THAT IS THIS.

THIS IS THE BEAUTIFICATION, FOR TYPE B FUNDS WE'RE LOOKING AT

[00:05:02]

A SMALL GROUND NEXT TO THE LIBRARY.

SHADE STRUCTURES. YOU CAN UTILIZE OUT PART OF THAT THE LIBRARY FOR STORY TIME OR THINGS LIKE THAT.

THE GREEN AREA, WHICH IS B. TYPE A FUNDS UTILIZE THERE.

MORE HEART INFRASTRUCTURE. YOU NOTICE AT&T PARKING LOT WE'VE GOT BEHIND US. ALL OF THE ON STREET PARKING PAVERS GO ACROSS THE STREET TO THE CURRENT CITY HALL.

KIND OF HOW WE HAVE BROKEN TWO FUNDS DOWN.

APPROXIMATELY 2.9 EACH. RIGHT NIALL AT 29.9 BUILDING SITE ACQUISITION. ROUGHLY JUST UNDER 3 MILLION ON BOTH OF THE OTHER TWO ENHANCEMENT.

THE BLUE AND GREEN. WHAT I AM CALLING THE BLUE AND GREEN. STOP ME AT ANY POINT, PLEASE IF I'M GOING TO FAST OR ANY QUESTIONS WHATSOEVER.

QUESTIONS? >> YOU ARE CORRECT. ONCE AGAIN, I WILL RUN THROUGH THIS AGAIN. 25 MILLION IN ORIGINAL BOND.

WHERE WE ARE AT WITH THE WHITE OUTLINE IS 27.9.

BASICALLY FOUR WALLS OF THE BUILDING AND INSIDE.

THAT INCLUDES FFD. INCLUDES TECHNOLOGY.

INCLUDES CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS ALL THAT STUFF.

SITE ACQUISITION, TWO BUILDINGS WE BOUGHT ACROSS THE STREET WAS 1.9. THAT BRINGS US TO 29.9.

THAT IS KIND OF FOUR WALLS AND TWO BUILDINGS THAT WE BOUGHT.

OUTSIDE OF THAT, WE'RE LOOKING AT THE BEAUTIFICATION, INFRASTRUCTURE TO SUPPORT THESE BUILDINGS.

ADDITIONAL AT&T PARKING LOT BACK HERE.

DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. LARGER DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE.

THINKING THAT IS THE DOWNTOWN, PROBABLY USE THAT AT LEAST THOSE BUILDINGS CLOSER TO THIS AREA.

SO, THAT LEAVES US TO APPROXIMATELY $10.8 MILLION.

25 MILLION APPROVED BY THE VOTERS TO WHAT THE DESIGN IS NOW. THE DESIGN IS TODAY.

GOING THROUGH THE DIFFERENT POTS OF MONEY, WE TALKED TO 4A AND 4B LAST NIGHT. REPRESENTATIVES OF BOTH THE TYPE LETTER A AND TYPE B BOARDS ABOUT THIS.

THEY ARE CONTEMPLATING. UTILIZING SOME FUNDING FOR THIS PROJECT. WE ALSO HAVE THE FUND BALANCE, APPROXIMATELY 27 MILLION IN THAT CURRENTLY.

TO MAKE UP $10.8 MILLION, THE FUNDS THAT WE HAVE IDENTIFIED

THAT COULD BE UTILIZED FOR THAT >> WHAT WAS THE DATE WE WENT OUT TO GET THE BOND [INDISCERNIBLE]?

>> 20 ÃMAY 2021. >> 21.

>> YES, SIR. >> DID YOU LOOK AT

[INDISCERNIBLE]? >> YES, SIR.

WE COULD NOT UTILIZE THOSE FOR THIS.

THE NEXT SLIDE WE WILL SEE LOW IN FUNDING FOR THE PDM PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING. USE OF [NAME] FOR THAT IN THOSE BONDS AS WELL. THAT IS MONEY THAT WE COULD UTILIZE. ARE THERE QUESTIONS RELATED TO

THE CITY HALL? >> ARE YOU ABOUT TO MOVE ON:

>> YEAH >> OKAY, SO, WHEN WAS OUR LAST

ESTIMATE OR BID ON? >> OH, JOHN.

I'M SORRY. >>

>> THIS ONE RIGHT HERE? >> THE ONE BEFORE

>> EARLY SEPTEMBER. SEPTEMBER OR ÃI MEAN SEPTEMBER 3, PROBABLY. VERY EARLY SEPTEMBER.

THIS ONE WAS DONE LESS THAN A WEEK AGO.

>> WE THOUGHT WE WERE 7 MILLION IN SEPTEMBER NOW WE ARE 10?> YEAH. REFINING THE PROJECT.

NUMBER ONE, COST ESTIMATION. REFINING THE PRODUCT AND GETTING A LOT MORE DETAILED WHICH TYPE OF HVAC, THE MECHANICAL, THE PRICES ARE ASTRONOMICAL RIGHT NOW.

BEING ABLE TO REFINE THAT QUANTITIES AND ACTUAL DESIGN OF THE BUILDING HELPS US REFINE THAT COST.

>> WITH CONSTRUCTION COSTS GOING DOWN, WE HAVE GONE UP IN

[00:10:05]

>> YES, SIR. CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE REALLY NOT GOING DOWN. YOU MIGHT HAVE A PIECE GOING DOWN OR TWO BY FOUR GOING DOWN, OVERALL PRICES ARE GOING UP EXTRAVAGANTLY. ESPECIALLY COMMERCIAL TYPE BUILDINGS. RESIDENTIALLY IT MIGHT BE LEVELING OFF. WHAT WE'VE SEEN OVER THE PAST M OVER THE PAST 12 MONTHS HAS GONE UP 100 PERCENT.

WE HAVE GOT THAT, I THINK, WE GOT THAT BASICALLY RIGHT AS THE HURRICANE WAS HITTING SOUTH OF FLORIDA.

WE HAVE NOT INCORPORATED THOSE COSTS YET WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT RIGHT NOW. THAT IS WHY I HAVE JACK HERE.

HE AS AN EXPERT IN THE TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF CONTRACTORS TO LOOK INTO THOSE COSTS AND WHERE THEY ARE GOING.

>> SO, EVERY ONE OF YOUR GUYS CAN ANSWER MY EMAIL.

I LEFT A MEETING WITH A CONCRETE GUY FOR SUBDIVISION WE'RE WORKING ON. HE SAID NOVEMBER 3 CONCRETE

EXPECTED TO GO UP AGAIN. >> YES.

I HEARD OCTOBER >> OCTOBER

>> OCTOBER AND AGAIN IN APRIL. THEY FACTORED IN ANOTHER INCREASE IN APRIL. WE CAN LOOK AT THIS AS WELL

>> AS WE GO TO THIS PROCESS, HONE IN ON THE NUMBERS ABOUT 50

PERCENT NOW. >> YES

>> WHEN WILL THOSE NUMBERS BE FINALIZED AT 100 PERCENT?

>> BASICALLY WHEN WE GO OUT TO BID.

WHAT WE'VE DONE IN THIS WE HAVE BUILT IN INFLATION AND CONTINGENCY. IT'S AT 50 PERCENT NOW AND CONTINGENCY THIS BIG. I AM SORRY, EXCUSE MY HAND.

THE CLOSER WE GET THE CONTINGENCY AND ESCALATION GOES DOWN BECAUSE WE HAVE MORE CONFIDENCE.

THIS ESTIMATE WITHIN THESE FIGURES ARE PRETTY LARGE RIGHT NOW. THE CLOSER WE GET THE MORE DETAILED WE GET, THE LESS WE WILL BE OUT THERE.

THAT IS WHERE WE ABSORB SOME PRICE INCREASES.

>> IN JULY WHEN WE ARE LAST ALTOGETHER.

TALKED ABOUT RELIEF PACKAGE. AT THE END OF OCTOBER, RELEASING A PACKAGE THAT HAS FINALIZED CONCRETE WORK OR FLAT WORK. THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND UNITS OF ALL OF THOSE ITEMS. THE LARGER DISTRIBUTION PANELS SWITCHGEAR. WHICH HAPPEN TO BE COMPONENTS EXPERIENCING SOME OF THE HIGHEST INCREASES IN THE LAST Ã ESPECIALLY 6-8 MONTHS. THAT PACKAGE IS GOING OUT AT THE END OF OCTOBER. WE ARE GOING TO HAVE PRICES, ACTUAL HARD BIDS TO BRING COUNSEL.

FIRST PACKAGE TO ANSWER QUESTION.

ESTIMATES TO ACTUAL BIDS. >> THAT WILL LOCK THOSE OUT

>> LEFT THOSE PIECES DOWN >> THOSE PARTS OF IT CAN NO LONGER BE IMPACTED GOING OUT. GOING BACK TO IN JULY WHEN WE WERE TALKING ABOUT GRABBING THESE PIECES, GET THEM OUT OF THE TIMELINE FOR WHEN THE PLANS ARE COMPLETELY DONE IN JANUARY.

GO OUT TO BID AND BRING FINAL GMP IN FEBRUARY.

WE ARE ALMOST THERE. OUR RISK WORKING TO MITIGATE.

ALMOST CLOSING THAT DOOR. BIG, SWING COMPONENTS.

WHAT WILL WE CALL IT? MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL,

PLUMBING. >> A FAIR STATEMENT, CLYDE, YOU SAID INFLATION NUMBERS BILL IT INTO THAT NUMBER?

>> WE DO >> FAIR TO SAY OVERAGES AS PART 210.8 AND OUT OF FIRM 10.8? DOES IT MAKE SENSE?

>> I THINK WHAT YOU'RE ASKING, NORMALLY WHEN I DO A LOT OF BUILDERS AND YOU HANDLE 50 PERCENT PLANS.

A LOT OF THEM COVER YOUR BUTT IN THERE.

IS THIS BASICALLY COVER YOUR BUTT NUMBER?

>> THAT IS A GOOD WAY TO PUT IT.

ARE WE COVERING THAT RISK BETWEEN OCTOBER OR WHEN THAT PRICES PUT TOGETHER ABOUT THREE WEEKS AGO, FIRST IS WHEN WE BRING YOU THE FIRST PACKAGE IN NOVEMBER, ARE WE COVERING OUR BACKSIDES CONNECT AND ARE WE COVERING OUR BACKSIDES ON THE REST OF THE PROJECT? WHEN WE BRING FINAL GMP IN FEBRUARY. BASED ON TRENDS AND BASED ON WHAT WE CAN SEE, WHAT IS OUT IN FRONT OF US WE FEEL COMFORTABLE WE'RE COVERING THAT WITH OWNERS CONTINGENCY, CONSTRUCTION

CONTINGENCY, ESCALATION >> WHAT IS OCCURRING THESE NUMBERS

[00:15:02]

>> WE HAVE A TOTAL. WE ARE USING ONE PERCENT A MONTH, WHICH IS WHAT ALL OF OUR EXPERTS ARE TELLING US.

ALL WE HAVE BEEN EXPERIENCING OVERALL AND AGGREGATE

>> AWAY FROM ACTUAL BID, YOU HAD ONE PERCENT

>> YES >> CONTINGENCY STAYS 10 PERCENT. CONTINGENCY THAT PROBABLY STAYS

AT A DIFFERENT NUMBER >> YES.

THE ESCALATION WILL DECREASE. >> SO, THE CONTINGENCY IS 10

PERCENT >> ROUGHLY, I DON'T THINK IT'S 10 PERCENT IN THIS.T IS FIVE PERCENT.

THREE AND TWO. THREE AND FIVE PERCENT, THAT

WILL REMAIN THE SAME >> DID WE DO ANY VALUE ENGINEERING? OH, YEAH, SIR.

>> THAT HAS BEEN NONSTOP. >> WITH COSTS GOING UP, YOU ARE SAYING SOME OF THESE ITEMS, DO Y'ALL HAVE MULTIPLE BIDS ON THESE ITEMS THAT ALONG THE WAY SHOW THAT?> WELL, WE DO NOT HAVE BEEN SHIPPED. [NAME] IS BUILDING A PD, PLEASE STATION IN MANSFIELD. BUILDING ALL OVER THE METROPLEX. GETTING BIDS IN FROM THESE OTHER JOBS TO HELP THEM IN THEIR ESTIMATION.

THEY ALSO HAVE GOOD RELATIONSHIPS WITH PEOPLE WHO ARE MASONS, ELECTRICAL, HVAC THAT HELP THEM COME UP WITH ESTIMATIONS. WE WILL GET MULTIPLE BIDS

>> WE ARE GETTING [INDISCERNIBLE]

MICROPHONE] >> COME BACK UP, PLEASE.

I AM A STICKLER FOR DETAILS >> YES.

WE ARE GETTING MULTIPLE BUDGETARY ESTIMATES FROM

MULTIPLE SUB CONTRACTORS. >> CAN WE SEE THOSE, THEN COME

AT SOME POINT?> SURE >> WE HAVE ESTIMATE BID TABS

FROM MULTIPLE SUBS >> OKAY.

THANK YOU. >>

>> YES, SIR >> LAST TIME SOMETHING WAS BROUGHT UP A VOT GET IT [INDISCERNIBLE] COST OR PRODUCTS UPFRONT, HAVE WE DONE THAT?

>> WE HAVE NOT AT THIS POINT, BUT THAT IS WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT. WE WILL TALK ABOUT THAT LATER IN THE PRESENTATION. GOING OUT FOR SOME THOSE THINGS

IN NOVEMBER. >> DESIGN PACKAGES, WE HAVE AN EARLY DESIGN PACKAGE COMING OUT, UNDER UTILITIES WITH A SIGN. A MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL PLUMBING AND EQUIPMENT. WE HAVEN'T PUT IT OUT.

A COUPLE WEEKS AWAY GETTING THAT READY TO GO OUT TO BID.

WE HAVE BEEN GUIDING THE DESIGN TO EARLY OUT PACKAGE LIKE YOU

TALKED ABOUT BACK IN JULY >> OKAY.

>> ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS RELATED TO CITY HALL?

>> DO YOU WANT US TO WAIT AND GET THE REST OF YOUR

PRESENTATION? >> IT IS UP TO YOU ALL.

YOU HAVE A QUESTION PERTINENT TO THE SLIDER PREVIOUS SLIDE.

>> WHAT ARE WE TRYING TO ANSWER?

>> WE ARE TRYING TO ANSWER ARE WE RAID TO MOVE FORWARD? ALLOCATE ADDITIONAL FUNDING TO THESE PROJECTS AND MOVE FORWARD? WE ARE KIND OF AT THAT POINT THAT WE NEED TO KNOW ARE WE MOVING FORWARD?

ON THOSE TWO PROJECTS >> WITH RESPECT, I MEAN, ISN'T IT IMAGINARY MOVING FORWARD AT THE MOMENT? THAT 10 COULD GO TO 9. THE 10 COULD GO TO 12.

WE WILL NOT KNOW THAT POINT UNTIL JANUARY.

BEFORE THAT ADDITIONAL FUNDING, WE GO BACK TO DRAWING BOARDS.

WE CUT MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF SQUARE FOOTAGE OUT OF THESE PROGRAMS. THIS IS KIND OF AN INFLECTION POINT. WE NEED TO KNOW TO GO FORWARD;

HOW TO PROCEED GOING FORWARD >> CLYDE , CHRIS, GREG THAT NEED BE. WHAT WE'RE DOING NOW IS GETTING AN UPDATE ON TWO MAJOR PROJECTS.

THIS CITY HALL AND PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER.

MAINLY BECAUSE EVER-INCREASING PRICES.

THEY WANT TO KNOW AND WHAT WE ARE WISHING TONIGHT, DO WE WANT TO GO FORWARD AS IS? OR DO WE WANT TO STEP BACK AND RECONSIDER? IF WE GO FORWARD, WHEREVER LOOKING FOR FUNDING? AND ALSO, THEY WANT TO DO EARL RELEASES IN OCTOBER. THEY COME BACK TO US AND ASK APPROVAL . ONCE WE GIVE THEIR APPROVAL, SOMEWHAT MORE COMMITTED. WE ARE LOOKING AT WHAT DECEMBER-JANUARY WHAT DECEMBER-JANUARY 2 70 FULL BIDS

OUT >> YEAH.

JANUARY >> KIND OF AN OVERVIEW OF WHY WE ARE HERE TONIGHT. WHEN THEY FINISH, LAST COUNSEL QUESTION, DO WE WANT TO GO COAL FORWARD OR DO WE WANT TO DO ME

[00:20:01]

CLYDE. >> THANK YOU.

CURRENTLY DELTA 10.8 CITY HALL LIBRARY.

I WILL GO INTO PUBLIC SAFETY AND COURTS BUILDING.

GO THROUGH THE SAME SCENARIO. BUDGET VERSUS ESTIMATES.

OSSIBLE SOLUTION. THE BOND ELECTION WAS 46 MILLION THAT WENT TO THE VOTERS.

COUNSEL ALLOCATED ANOTHER 5 MILLION FROM BONDS THAT WE SOLD FOR THAT. THE ENTIRE BUDGET CAME TO $51,002,233. WHEN WE GOT INTO THAT ÃSO, THIS IS PUBLIC SAFETY COST ESTIMATE PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING, COMBINED TWO PROJECTS A PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING.

ALLOCATED 51 FOR BOTH PROJECTS. RIGHT NOW WE ARE $57.7 MILLION FOR BOTH PROJECTS. WE BROKEN OUT THERE PRINT THE WAY BE BROKEN OUT, THESE ARE TWO.

THE SAME BUILDING. WE BROKEN OUT BY SQUARE FOOT COST. COURT BUILDING IS 9600 SQUARE FEET. ENTRYWAY.

OFFICES. THOSE TYPE OF THINGS.

WITH THAT, THAT COMES TO $57,000,778.

THE DELTA WE HAVE IN THIS PROJECT IS 6.7 MILLION.

REALLY WHAT WE HAVE TO COVER THIS AND WHAT WE SUGGESTED ARE THE ARPA FUNDS. ATE MY DOLLARS FROM TWO THAT CAME IN FROM ARPA FUNDS. WE TALKED ABOUT A LOT OF DIFFERENT PROJECTS THAT WE WANT TO UTILIZE FUNDS FOR.

ONE POSSIBLE SOLUTION WE COULD UTILIZE TO MAKE UP SOLUTION IS ARPA FUNDS. SO, THAT IS PUBLIC SAFETY AND COURTS. A LITTLE MORE CLEAR CUT JUST BECAUSE I DON'T WANT TO SAY THE SCOPE CREEP A LOT ON THE CITY HALL THIS IS A MUCH BIGGER PROJECT

>> IS THERE 8 MILLION IN ARPA FUNDS ARE DOWN TO 7 AFTER WE

HAD A TAX DECREASE? >> IT IS DOWN FROM THAT, PLUS PROPERTY STUFF. WE ARE FIGURING WE HAVE ROUGHLY

7 MILLION (NOT EXACT, BUT Ã >> 7 MILLION IN OUR BOOK, HOW MUCH IS IN OUR ACCOUNT RIGHT NOW?

I SAW KYLE BACK THERE. >> OH, I DON'T HAVE THE EXACT.

>> I DON'T KNOW HE'S GOING TO ANSWER THE QUESTION OR NOT

>> I'M JUST ASKING WHAT ALL DIFFERENT FUNDING SOURCES HAVE ON HAND. I DID NOT ASK FOR THE MONEY

YET. >> KYLE, DO YOU WANT TO ANSWER

THAT? >> KYLE IF YOU WANT TO COME Ã

>> IS ALAN HERE? >> I DO NOT BELIEVE HE IS HERE.

THEY HAD 8, BUT I THINK THEY HAD A FEW PROJECTS.

BUT SOME OF THEM ARE, LIKE, ROUNDABOUT.

>> HOW MUCH DID YOU SAY WE HAVE IN RESERVE?

27? >> 27.

THAT IS IN FLUX BECAUSE THE END OF THE YEAR AND THOSE TYPE OF

THINGS >> ONE LAST QUESTION, CHRIS,

HOW MANY DAYS IS EQUAL TO 190? >> THINK IT WAS 130 PER DAY.

>> $130,000 PER DAY. >> WHICH IS AROUND 200 DAYS.

I DID 127. THAT'S 207 DAYS.

THE FUND Ã >> I GUESS THE MATH I WAS FIGURING WAS OUR POLICY SO WE WOULD NOT GO BELOW 180.

IF WE STICK TO OUR MONEY, HOW MUCH MONEY STILL SITTING OUT THERE?> KEEP MONITOR. WE ARE USING SOME BUDGET, WHERE

POINT THAT DOWN SOME. >> PROJECTED FOR THE END OF THE YEAR. WE ALREADY HAVE SOME.

>> THEY ARE ALL MEMBERS, STRAIGHTEN HALF.

WELL, ARE WE ALL GOING TO SPEAK?

>> I WAS GOING TO HAND IT OFF TO JACK ROWE QUICK TO TALK ABOUT THE ECONOMY OR THINGS LIKE THAT, OR WE CAN CONTINUE THIS DISCUSSION, HOWEVER YOU WOULD LIKE MAYOR OR COUNSEL.

>> GET THROUGH PRESENTATION AND I WILL COME BACK UP FOR

QUESTIONS, IF THAT IS ALL RIGHT >> WE HAVE JUSTIN JUMP IN HERE.

WE HAVE TYPE A, WHICH IS CORRECT LEGAL TERM.

TYPE A AND TYPE B PARTICIPATION.

ARPA FUNDS 7 MILLION WE HAVE THE FUND BALANCE.

[00:25:03]

PRESENTATIONS OF THEM. >> DO WE WANT TO GO FORWARD IS? AND THEN WITH THE UNDERSTANDING WE WILL LOOK TO FOUR SOURCES TO COVER THE DIFFERENCE. OR DO WE WANT TO GO BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARDS CONNECT PERSONALLY, IF YOU GO BACK TO DRAWING BOARDS, YOU ARE CAUSING DELAY.AUSING INCREASED COSTS. WE HAVE REAL NEEDS FOR BOTH PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER. THE NEED IS CLEARLY IDENTIFIED, IN MY OPINION, THE CITY HALL WE'RE TWO YEARS AWAY.

BUILDING BILL FOR 15,000 CITIZENS.

CITY OF 38 APPROACHING 40,000. WELL OVER 40,000 BY THE TIME WE GET THE BUILDING BUILDS. PERSONALLY, I THINK WE SHOULD LOOK TO ARPA, 4K, 4B AND THE LAST PLACE WE GO IS SAVINGS ACCOUNT FOR THE FUND BALANCE. COUNCIL, THAT IS MY COMMENTS.

IF YOU WOULD ALL LIKE TO MAKE COMMENTS OR WE GO INTO ADDITIONAL PRESENTATION BY THE CONSULTANTS.

>> GO BACK ONE THING. HOW MUCH MONEY PER DAY ON

RESERVE? >> 130,000 PER DAY.

AT 20 DAYS THAT WE GIVE YOU 2.6.

AND WE HAVE SOMETHING OVER, WE HAVE 30-40 DAYS BY CALCULATION.

WE HAVE 30 OR 40 DAYS AVAILABLE.

WE COULD GO DOWN TO BELOW 180, DEPENDS ON WHERE YOU WANT TO GO. OTHER THINGS THAT WE NEED TO

COVER. >> REAL QUICK QUESTION.

COULD YOU BRIEFLY DISCUSS POTENTIAL FINANCIAL IMPACT OF GOING BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD SO TO SPEAK?

>> WELL, YOU ARE LOOKING AT AT LEAST ONE PERCENT A MONTH.

IF WE GO BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD, PART OF THE FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS ARCHITECT REDESIGN.

AT THIS POINT, GO TO THE VALUE OF ENGINEERING, WE WOULD HAVE TO CUT CORPORATE EACH OFFER PROJECTS.

GOING BACK TO THE BARE-BONES, BUT PRETTY CLOSE TO THE BARE-BONES.OU KNOW, WE HAVE GONE THROUGH SO MUCH VALUE ENGINEERING, I DON'T KNOW THERE IS MUCH JUICE LEFT FOR THE SQUEEZE AS FAR AS VALUE ENGINEERING.

IF WE NEED TO MAKE SIGNIFICANT CUTS 7 MILLION AND/OR TIMELY, WE DEAFLY HAVE TO CUT INTO SQUARE FOOTAGE.

WHAT THAT DOES, NUMBER ONE, COST ESCALATION OVER TIME.

I THINK WE WILL SEE THAT COST IS GOING UP.

TWO, REDESIGN FEES WITH ARCHITECT.

NOT NECESSARILY COST IMPLICATION RIGHT AWAY, BUT WHAT WE THINK ARE 20-25 YEAR BUILDINGS BECOME 10-15 ON A GOOD SIGN. WHAT WE HAVE NOW, WE'VE GOT BROKE SPACE IN THERE. WE CAN ABSORB GROWTH NEXT 10 YEARS OR SO. WHEN WE CUT OUT SQUARE FOOTAGE WE ARE PUTTING OUT GROWTH POTENTIAL; DOES THAT ANSWER

YOUR QUESTION? >>

>> NOT ONLY THAT, THE BOND MARKETING MATERIAL THAT WAS SENT OUT. ALTHOUGH I KNOW IT WAS AT THE

IDEA STAGE >> YES, SIR

>> PEOPLE VOTED BASED ON WHAT THEY SAW

>> YEAH. CHRIS CAN'T CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG.I THINK ONE OF THE THINGS ÃONE OF THE PLACES WE WERE VERY SPECIFIC WAS A 60,000 SQUARE FOOT LIBER.

IF WE BUILD ANYTHING, IT WOULD HAVE TO BE 16,000 FOOT SQUARE FOOT LIBRARY. THAT WOULD BE SOMEWHERE WE NEED TO. IF YOU LOOK AT ONE PERCENT A MONTH, LOOKING AAT $800,000 A MONTH.

>> IF WE HAVE A DELAY CONSERVATIVELY, HOW LONG WOULD YOU ESTIMATE THAT DELAY WOULD BE TO DO WHAT YOU APPROVE?

SIX MONTHS, MINIMUM? >> RICHARD, I THINK SIX MONTHS

IS ON THE OUTSIDE >>

>> WOULD YOU IF YOU'RE GOING TO SPEAK, WOULD YOU PLEASE COME UP? THANK YOU.

>> YOU COULD BE CLOSE TO SIX MONTHS.

[00:30:03]

>> GIVE US YOUR NAME. RICHARD MILLER WITH HAVARD WALKER ARCHITECTS. DELAY FOR REDESIGN FOR PUBLIC SAFETY Y FACILITY IN CITY HALL IN THE RANGE OF SIX MONTHS FOR

BOTH OF THOSE BUILDINGS. >>

>> SIR? >>

>> YES, SIR. >> PERFECT EXAMPLE IS 08 BOND ON COMMUNITY PARK. LOOK, THAT PARK AND UP GOING OVER THE LAND. YEARS.

HOW MUCH WAS IN THAT PARK IN THE END?0 MILLION

>> IN THE END 40 MILLION >> I DON'T EVEN REMEMBER

>> $19 MILLION PHASE 2. I'M NOT SURE [INDISCERNIBLE].

>>

I DON'T THINK WE NEED TO TWO. >> OH, NO.

I WAS JUST SAYING THAT IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE WHEN WE DELAY

>> RIGHT. I AGREE WITH THAT, NO.

[LAUGHING] >> CAN YOU >> I AM SORRY

>> EXPLAIN THE 81 MILLION, AGAIN.

DID YOU NOTICE >> JOHN, CAN YOU EXPLAIN 81

MILLION? >> ALL IN.

>> CONSTRUCTION Ã

COSTS, FF [INDISCERNIBLE] >> FOR BOTH PROJECTS?

>> BOTH PROJECTS >> OKAY.

>> TO YOUR POINT, COUNSEL MAN, IF WE DO DELAY FOUR MONTHS, THEN WE STARTED A WHOLE OF 3.2 MILLION JUST TO GET BACK WHERE

WE WERE TODAY >> YEAH.

SO Ã >> THEN WE HAVE TO CUT OUT MORE. CUT OUT ENOUGH SQUARE FOOTAGE TO PAY FOR THE DELAY. NOW WE ARE ZEROED BACK OUT TO WHERE WE ARE RIGHT NOW. WE HAVE TO CUT OUT MORE SQUARE FOOTAGE TO SAVE ON THESE PROJECTS

>> FOR CITY HALL, YOU WOULD HAVE TO CUT $13 MILLION

>> YES, SIR. ERNIE-40 MILLION CUTS ON BOTH PROJECTS. SIGNIFICANT.

>> CAN WE HEAR FROM THE ECONOMIST? HE HAD HIS LIGHT ON, I DON'T KNOW IF HE IS A QUESTION.

>> YEAH, I WILL GET JACK BAXLEY UP HERE.

HE WILL SPEAK TO ALL YOUR QUESTIONS A LOT MORE ELOQUENTLY THAN I CAN.

[LAUGHING] >> THANKS FOR HAVING ME HERE.

THIS AFTERNOON. I AM JACK BAXLEY.

VICE PRESIDENT OF TAX-OH, ASSOCIATE JOURNAL CONTRACTORS.

BEEN IN THIS GAME 33 YEARS. SO, I'VE SEEN WHAT GOES ON OUT AND ABOUT. WE HAVE OFFICE IN DALLAS.

OFFICE IN FORT WORTH. I AM ALWAYS PROUD TO SAY I LIVE IN FORT WORTH AND HOW IS MY OFFICE IN FORT WORTH? I'M ALWAYS MUCH HAPPIER DRIVING TO THE WEST THAN I AM TO THE OTHER WAY, THE THE EAST. I ADDRESS QUITE A FEW DIFFERENT . HERE IN LAST FEW MONTHS FROM BANKERS, TO SCHOOL DISTRICTS, TO DEVELOPERS.

BECAUSE YOU SEE NATIONALLY, ABC NATIONALLY, TWO ECONOMISTS THAT KEEP US UP-TO-DATE ON STATISTICS OF WHAT IS GOING ON IN THIS COUNTRY AS A WHOLE. I ALSO TAKE AND LOOK AND TALK TO THE CONTRACTORS. THE GENERAL ESPECIALLY CONTRACTORS IN NORTH AND EAST TEXAS AREA TO GET A FEEL OF WHAT IS HAPPENING REALLY QUARTER BY QUARTER.

JUST IN THE LAST COUPLE OF WEEKS, WE FINISHED THE THIRD QUARTER. I CALL THESE TIMES MOMENTUM AMID UNCERTAINTY. AND I CAN IMAGINE YOU HAVE A LOT OF QUESTIONS.A LOT OF SCHOOL BOARDS I TALKED TO HAVE A LOT OF QUESTIONS. THE PRICES AND THE ESCALATIONS ÃI HAVE NEVER SEEN THEM ALL OF MY YEARS.

I NEVER SEEN THE UNCERTAINTY WE HAVE NOW IN FLUCTUATION.

GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE, THERE WAS A SCHOOL DISTRICT THAT PASSED A BOND PROGRAM NOT TOO LONG AGO. IN MAY THEY WENT OUT WITH

[00:35:03]

SO, NOW THEY'RE KIND OF IN A BIND.

I WANT TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF WHAT WE ARE SEEING.

AS FAR AS PRICE ESCALATIONS GO. WE STARTED TO SEE THIS BACK ALMOST 4 YEARS AGO WHEN WE HAD TARIFFS UNDER THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION. TARIFFS PUT IN PLACE.

WE SAW THAT AFFECTING THE LUMBER PRICES.

WE SAW THAT AFFECTING SOME OF THE STEEL PRICES.

SO, WE SEEN THOSE AREAS INCREASED SIGNIFICANTLY.

FOR EXAMPLE, STEEL PRICES UP 124 PERCENT SINCE 2020.

THAT IS ONE HECK OF ACCELERATION WHEN YOU LOOK AT THAT. THAT IS JUST NOT MY NUMBERS, YOU KNOW, THAT IS WHEN YOU ARE LOOKING AT FEDERAL GROUPS THAT ARE COMING OUT WITH THOSE NUMBERS THAT TRACK IT.

I THINK YOU WILL SEE ON YOUR SLIDES, ALL OF YOU WILL HAVE THAT AVAILABLE TO YOU, TOO. YOU CAN SEE THE MAIN INPUTS THAT ARE ON COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION PROJECT.

THE UPS AND DOWNS AND HAVE BEEN OUT THERE SO FAR. THIS IS WHERE THEIR QUARTER HAS ENDED. I HAVE USED STREETLIGHT, RED, HOT. THERE COULD BE PROBLEMS HERE.

CAUTION, MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD, SOMETHING'S WORKING AND LIVING BETTER. AND GREEN, THINGS HAVE PICKED UP. FOR EXAMPLE, WATERPROOFING IN THE FIRST QUARTER OF THE YEAR, THAT WAS A BRIGHT RED SIGNAL.

THIS IS JUST ÃTHAT IS NOT ON NATIONAL LEVEL.

THIS IS NORTH TEXAS. WHAT WE ARE SEEING HERE IN NORTH TEXAS WITH THE INDUSTRY. CONCRETE, AS YOU MENTIONED, CLERK YOU MENTIONED EARLIER, YOU KNOW, THAT IS GOING TO GO UP. I REMEMBER A TIME WHEN FLY ASH, THEY WERE GIVING IT AWAY. YOU COULD GO GET FLY ASH, ONE OF THE MAIN INGREDIENTS FOR CONCRETE.

EVERYBODY WAS HAVING AN AWAY. NOW SOME TO THE HIGHEST PRICE IT IS EVER BEEN AN SHORT SUPPLY.

A REASON WHY THAT HAPPENED. WE ARE NOT GOING TO GO THROUGH THAT ALL NIGHT LONG.

BETTER. METALS ARE GETTING A BIT BETTER. MILLWORK ASSIGNMENT, IT IS STILL KIND OF MIDDLE OF THE ROAD.

WHAT THEY ARE SAYING, SOME OF THE WOOD IS DOWN FIVE OR 10 PERCENT.OWN FIVE PERCENT AFTER IT HAS GONE UP 100-120 MORE PERCENT, IT IS GOOD TO SEE IT GO DOWN.

IT HAS NOT GONE DOWN TO WHERE WE NEED TO GET IT.

ROOFING ENCLOSURE SYSTEMS. MAIN PART OF YOUR BUILDING.

THERE ARE BIG PROBLEMS THERE. LIKE IT IS SAYING, EXPECT TO SEE 10-15 PERCENT INCREASE PER QUARTER IN 2022.

SO, WE ARE GOING TO SEE THAT. LIKE IT IS HERE.

7-9 MONTHS DELIVERY TIME FOR INSTALLATION.

SOME FASTENERS AND MEMBRANES. I KNOW OF A ROOFING CONTRACTOR IN THE DALLAS AREA THAT ACTUALLY OPENED THEIR DOORS IN THE SECOND QUARTER BECAUSE THEY HAD WORK AND THEY CONNECTED THE FASTENERS. THEY COULD GET NOT ALL THE SPIES. THEY HAD A PPP LOAD: KEEP ALL THEIR PEOPLE GOING. PEOPLE ARE BREAKING OUT AND STARTING TO WORK. THE MATERIALS RAN OUT.

SO, THAT CAUSED A PROBLEM THERE.

SO, THAT IS WHERE WE'RE WATCHING OUT THERE.

WE SEE A LITTLE MORE READ UP HERE.

CURTAIN. THEY HAVE INCREASED UP TO 50 PERCENT IN SOME CASES HERE LOCALLY.

ALL DEPENDS ON SCOPE AND SIZE OF PROJECT.

FRAMING AND DRYWALL, CEILINGS HAVE GOTTEN, YOU KNOW, IN CAUTIONARY AREA NOW. THAT WAS REALLY BRIGHT RED FOR QUITE SOME TIME. FLOORING, TILE, AND STONE.

FLOORING IS A BIG DEAL. THERE IS GOING TO BE SOME STRESS POINTS THERE. WHO WOULD EVER THOUGHT THAT ARMSTRONG FLOORING WOULD BE FILING BANKRUPTCY? THIS IS HOW BAD AND DRAMATIC IT HAS GOTTEN OUT IN THE MARKETPLACE. IN THE MANUFACTURING SECTOR.

[00:40:04]

SO, THERE WILL HAVE TO BE SOME CHANGES THERE.

ARCHITECTURAL INDUSTRIES, VERY MUCH AWARE OF THIS.

THEY ARE ALL LOOKING FOR NEW FLOORING IN THAT.

BASICALLY, ARMSTRONG WAS PRODUCING VCT'S AND LVT, FLOORING LINES. WHICH WERE COMMON IN COMMERCIAL PROJECTS. ONE OF THE KEY AREAS THAT I WOULD ÃAND SPEAKING TO A LOT OF CONTRACTORS WHEN I'M HEARING FROM ESPECIALLY CONTRACTORS IS THAT THEY ARE HAVING PROBLEMS WHEN IT COMES TO ELECTRICAL ITEMS. NOW, I HAVE A DELL OR LOW-VOLTAGE.

YOU KNOW, YOU HAVE ELECTRICAL SITE OVER HERE AS YELLOW.

LOW-VOLTAGE IS A BIG, BIG ITEM. SWITCHGEAR IS.

SOME PEOPLE CANNOT GET SWITCHGEAR'S.

THERE ARE JOBS BEING HELD UP IN THIS AREA.

BIG, MULTIMILLION DOLLAR JOBS BEING HELD UP BECAUSE THEY CANNOT GET ENOUGH SWITCHGEAR'S. OTHING NEW, THIS HAS BEEN HAPPENING THIS PAST YEAR. IT HAS BECOME VERY PROBLEMATIC.

ON THE HVAC SIDE, MECHANICAL SIDE.

THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR, ESPECIALLY CONTRACTORS KNOW IT.

THEY ARE DOING EVERYTHING THEY CAN TO WORK WITH THE OWNERS AND ENGINEERING GROUPS TO GET YOUR EQUIPMENT.

NEED TO LOOK AT GETTING YOUR EQUIPMENT ON THAT FRONT END.

IF YOU ARE LOOKING ÃIF YOU ARE YOU ARE LOOKING 24-52 WEEKS, ON AVAILABILITY. I MEAN, THIS IS IN OUR AREA.

AND IT IS EVEN LONGER WAIT TIMES ACROSS THE COUNTRY.

THE NORTH TEXAS AREA, WHAT WE ARE SITTING IS A SWEET SPOT HERE. WE ARE ONE OF THE STRONGEST, MOST ROBUST CONSTRUCTION ECONOMIES IN THE UNITED STATES.

AS SUCH, SOME OF THESE OTHER JOBS HAVE PUT A STRESS ON GETTING MATERIAL TO THE AREA. WHAT I MEAN BY OTHER JOBS? IN SHERMAN. SMALL, LITTLE SHERMAN.

TIAS BUILDING $2.7 TRILLION CHIP FACTORY.

DO YOU KNOW HOW MUCH STEEL GOES INTO THAT? THERE IS A ANOTHER FACTORY COMING OUT THERE BY GROUP IN JAPAN THAT IS BUILDING IT. $2.3 TRILLION.

WE FOUND AMAZON, THE STRESS FROM THEM COMING INTO THE AREA AND BUILDING THEIR FACILITIES WAS CAUSING STRESS ON IT.

AS FAR AS ÃI'VE HAD A LOT OF CONTRACTORS, GENERALS AND SUBS EXPLAINED TO ME, STRUCTURAL STEEL.

I WILL HAVE TO LOOK TO YOU GUYS.

MAYBE IT INOT AS BAD TO NOW. BUT NUCOR, IF YOU PLACE YOUR LOAD WITH NUCOR, PLACE YOUR PRODUCT.

NUCOR WAS OUT THERE TELLING EVERYBODY HERE IS MY PRICE.

I GUARANTEE IT FOR 48 HOURS. 48 HOURS.

IT USED TO BE YOU GET YOUR PRICE AND WE ARE GOING TO GUARANTEE IT FOR SIX MONTHS OR SO.

IT IS PUSHED SO FAR TO THE POINT THAT GENERAL CONTRACTORS.

ESPECIALLY CONTRACTORS THAT JOINT VENTURE TOGETHER THAT GO UP BY 10-15 ACRES FENCE IT OUT. ORDERED THEIR STUFF, BRING IT IN, DROP IT OFF. NOW IT HAS COST MORE.

THEY TOUCH IT TWICE. YOU KNOW, WE ARE SEEING THAT STUFF WE HAVE NEVER, EVER SEEN BEFORE IS HAPPENING.

WHERE IS IT GOING? I WISH THE CRYSTAL BALL WOULD BE ABLE TO ÃTO BE ABLE TO TELL YOU.

THANKS ARE GOING TO BE SLIDING IN THE DIFFERENT DIRECTION.

INTEREST RATES, ONE THING. ARE WE IN RECESSION ARE HEADED TO RECESSION? WE DO NOT KNOW.

WHEN IT COMES TO A DOWNTURN IN ECONOMY IN RECESSIONARY TIME, THE NORTH TEXAS CONSTRUCTION MARKET HAS DONE THIS.

JUST LITTLE DIPS. WE NEVER HAD THESE BIG DIPS.

IT HAS BEEN YEARS AND YEARS. OVER 40 SOME YEARS.

DURING COVID WE WERE ABLE TO KEEP IT GOING.

THAT IS WHY WE HAVE SOME CONTINUITY.

BUT IT IS THESE DARN PRICES AND SUPPLY CHAIN FACTORS THAT ARE REALLY HAMMERING US. SO, YOU KNOW, I'M NOT ÃI'M HERE TO PROVIDE YOU AS THE FACTS.

THAT IS ABOUT IT. >> I DO NOT WANT TO CUT YOU OFF

TOO SOON >> NO.

[00:45:01]

>> SPECIFIC QUESTIONS FOR JACK? THERE IS INPUT.

FEEL FREE TO GIVE ME A CALL. I WOULD BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY

QUESTIONS >> THAT YOU HAVE.

IF YOU LIKE TO FOLLOW UP WITH ME BECAUSE WE ARE HERE.

THE SOURCE, THE VOICE OF COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY. PROVIDE FAIR AND BALANCE WHAT WE HAVE. OUR NUMBERS OUT OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. WHAT WE SEE HERE LOCALLY.

>> WHAT IS YOUR NUMBER, SIR? >> 817-480-8094.

THAT IS MY CELL PHONE. YOU CAN CALL ME ANYTIME.

>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH >> YOU BETCHA.

>> COUNCIL, >> CLYDE, I'VE GOT A COUPLE

STRAY QUESTIONS. >> YES, SIR

>> IS THIS STILL [INDISCERNIBLE], IS STILL

PRODUCING? >> IT WILL BE.

YOU'VE GOT THE ALUMINUM FOR WINDOWS AND THINGS LIKE THAT.

FOR THE RED IRON, SIMILAR TO THAT.

>> MIGHT BE A WEIRD QUESTION, DO YOU SEE HAYSTACKS?

>> NO >> TAX-EXEMPT?

>> YES >> THAT IS MIKE TWO WEIRD

QUESTIONS. >> I WILL CONTINUE ON IF YOU

HAVE QUESTIONS. >> COUNCIL, IT COMES DOWN TO ME TO THREE QUESTIONS. WHAT DO WE BUILD? WHEN DO WE BUILD? AND HOW DO WE PAY FOR IT? WHAT WE BUILD. I KNOW SOMEBODY WANTS TO ENTER THOUGHTS, I DON'T SEE HOW WE CAN BUILD ANYTHING LESS OR DIFFERENT THAN WHAT HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO US.

I THINK THAT IS WHAT THIS CITY NEEDS FOR THE AND SOMEHOW I THINK WE NEED TO STEP UP A NEW ÃIF WE DO ANYTHING LESS IN 10 YEARS. THE PAY, THE COST WILL BE HIGHER THAN WHAT WE SEE NOW. WHEN WE SHOULD GO FORWARD, IN MY OPINION, IT'S WILLING TO GO WORSE.

I DO NOT HAVE A CRYSTAL BALL. WORKING WITH FOR A, TYPE K, TYPE B. ARBA FUNDS. LAST WE GO TO OUR SAVINGS ACCOUNT. FUND MONEY NECESSARY TO GO FORWARD.S I UNDERSTAND IT, AND OCTOBER, EARLY NOVEMBER, THE CITY WILL BE COMING TO US FOR APPROVALS.

REQUEST TO APPROVE EARLY. >>

>> DECEMBER 6. YES, SIR

>> THAT IS FOR THE EARLY >> YES,70THAT WILL BE CIVIL, MECHANICAL, DIRT IN THERE IS WELL?

>> OKAY, CIVIL. PAY INVOICES FOR THE EARLY

BIDS. >> DISAPPROVE THE CONTRACTS?

>> YES, SIR >> THEY WILL HIT THE STREET LATE OCTOBER.

WE WILL HAVE BIDS READY FOR THE DECEMBER 6 MEETING.

COUNCIL, THOSE ARE MY THOUGHTS. APPRECIATE TO HEAR Y'ALL VERY

>> I THINK WHERE WE ARE AND WE WORKED IN HARD.

I THINK WE'RE GOING IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION.

I THINK WE HAVE TO CONTINUE WHERE WE ARE.

IF WE TRY TO GO BACK AND DO ANOTHER VALUE ENGINEERING JOB, IT'S WAY TO COST US MONEY IN THE LONG RUN.

AND KOSTAS PRODUCT. I THINK WE NEED TO MOVE ON IT.

I THINK WE JUST NEED TO DETERMINE WHERE THE MONEY IS GOING TO COME FROM AND FIX IT. NOT TRYING TO CHANGE THE MONEY.

I DO NOT THINK THAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN.AFTER TODAY IT'S ONLY GOING TO GET WORSE, NOT BETTER. I THINK WE NEED TO SAY YES, WE ARE GOING TO GO FOR. WHERE WE ARE RIGHT NOW WE NEED TO CONTINUE. LOOK INTO OUR POCKETS, WHERE WE'RE GOING TO GET THE MONEY TO PAY FOR.

IDENTIFY THAT AND MOVE ON. THAT IS THE WAY I AM FEELING.

>> YEAH. I AGREE WITH THE STATEMENTS THAT WERE MADE. AS MUCH AS IT HURTS, I BELIEVE WE ARE ALL FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE.

I BELIEVE IT'S A DIFFICULT DECISION.

IT HAS GOT TO BE MADE BY US AS A BODY. AGREE WITH SEDIMENTS FROM BOTH THE MAYOR AND MR. [NAME].

THESE ARE DIFFERENT. CORNERSTONES OF OUR COMMUNITY.

50-60-75 YEAR OLD BUILDINGS. THESE WILL BE WHAT PEOPLE LOOK TO IN OUR COMMITTEE. WE HAVE A DUTY TO OUR CITIZENS CURRENT AND FUTURE DO THIS RIGHT IN MY OPINION.

[00:50:06]

BUT IT IS NECESSARY TO DO IT RIGHT.

>> I KEEP IT SHORT. I AGREE WITH WHAT JUSTIN SAID.

>> YEAH, I AGREE WHAT HAS BEEN SENT.

ONLY OTHER ALTERNATIVE IS GO BACK OUT FOR A SECOND BOND AND INTEREST RATES HAVE SKYROCKETED.

YOU KNOW, I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE MATH FORMULA IS.

IT WOULD BE INTERESTING TO SEE WHAT WE PAY IN INTEREST IN WHAT WE PAY IN DIFFERENCE OF A SHORTAGE.

BUT I HAVE A FEELING WE WOULD BE PAYING MORE INTEREST.

>> I DON'T LIKE IT AT ALL. BUT I DON'T FEEL LIKE WE HAVE ANOTHER OPTION. OR REASONABLE OPTION.

SO, I VOTE WE MOVE FORWARD. >> THANK YOU, COUNCIL.

>> CLARK? >> IS STAFF SETTING DOWN FOR

FOUR A OR 4B,? >> WE ARE DRESSING FOR 4 A AND

B. >> IS THAT IT?

>> I APPRECIATE IT. >> THANK EVERYBODY.

WEBSITE THANK EVERYBODY IN ATTENDANCE.

AT 4:51 P.M. ADJOURN TO WORKSHOP.

AT 5 O'CLOCK SHARP WE WILL START CITY COUNCIL.

WHAT WE WILL DO IS REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS. THE CITIZENS TO BE HEARD AND PUBLIC ITEMS WE WILL START AT 6 O'CLOCK. AT 5 O'CLOCK, WE WILL START A CITY COUNCIL MEETING FOR REGULAR CONSENT

AGENDA. >>IT IS 504. TODAY IS OCTOBER 11.

[2022-435]

COUNSEL INVITES CITIZENS TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL ON THE AGENDA.

WE DO NOT HAVE ANY FORMS AT THIS TIME. AT SIX, I WILL CHECK AGAIN.

[CONSENT AGENDA]

MOTION PLEASE? >>MOTION TO APPROVE. >>IS THERE A SECOND?

>>A MOTION TO APPROVE, PLEASE VOTE. THE ITEM PASSES 5Ä.

HE REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS, AGAIN, WELCOME BACK TO THE PUBLIC ITEM SOMETIME AFTER SIX.

[2022-452]

WE DO HAVE SOME FUNDING FROM THE MDA FROM THIS. BREEZE NICHOLS HAS DONE THE DESIGN OF THIS AND THAT WAS IN JULY 2021 WHEN WE CONTRACTED WITH FREEZE NICHOLS.

WE ARE GOING TO 24 MILLION GALLONS A DAY PLANT. SO, THIS IS FOR THE UNDERWATER

[00:55:10]

MEMBRANE TRAINER. AIR COMPRESSOR, COMPRESSOR I CAN LATER TANK.

UP TO SIX MEMBRANE FILTRATION UNITS, PARALLEL RAW WATER PIPELINE WITHIN THE PROPERTY AND A PROGRAMMABLE CONTROLLER. ND A HUMAN MACHINE INTERFACE ON VACATION.

SO, YOU'RE GETTING THAT FOR A COST NOT TO EXCEED $19.4 MILLION.

>>YES. >>YOU DID A GREAT JOB.

[LAUGHTER] AND X WANTED TO LET EVERYBODY KNOW THAT AT THE MEETING, MICAH TOLD US THAT THIS HAD COME IN UNDER BUDGET. THEY ADDED SOME EXTRAS IN

THERE. SINCE HE CAME UNDER BUDGET. >>WANT TO SAY THE ESTIMATE WAS ABOUT 22 OR $23 MILLION. WITHIN MONEY COMING IN AT THIS POINT, BUT I KNOW FREEZE NICHOLS REACHED BACK OUT TO BAR CONSTRUCTIONS AND UNDERSTOOD THE BID AND THIS WAS A GOOD

COST. >>I WILL JUST ADD THAT THIS IS BASICALLY LOOKING AT THE FUNDING SOURCES. WE HAVE EIGHT HAVE MILLION DOLLAR BUDGET AND OF COURSE THAT BUDGET EXPIRED ON SEPTEMBER 30. ONE YEAR LATER, THE AGENDA ITEMS IS TO RE-APPROPRIATE THAT MONEY INTO THIS BUDGET. SO, THERE WAS ÃÃWAS $8 MILLION IN THIS YEAR'S BUDGET PLUS THE AMOUNT THAT THE MDA OFFERED TO EXPAND.

SO, WITH ALL, THAT IS THE FUNDING SOURCES FOR THE TOTAL. AND AS WE ARE READY STATED, THE BUDGET WAS 24 MILLION. IT CAME IN LESS THAN THAT. SO, WE WERE ABLE TO ADD IN SOME ALTERNATES THAT NEED TO BE DONE WITH THE PLAN. SO, ONCE WE GET THE BIDS AND AND THEY CAME IN FAVORABLE, WE WERE ABLE TO ADD SOME OF THE BID ALTERNATES BACK TO THE PROJECT. HAT THAT.

>>I'M SORRY COUNCILMAN. WE ACTUALLY WERE PRESENTATION OF THE CONSULTANT WAS GOING TO PRESENT AND BE STILL CANNOT PRESENTED. BUT AGAIN, I AM HERE TO FIX ANY QUESTIONS. BUT THIS ITEM ÃÃWITHIN BUDGET.

YOU TOOK IT TO THE ADVISORY BOARD AND DISCUSSED IT WITH THE ADVISORY BOARD AND THE THINGS THAT WE DID TALK ABOUT IS THAT WE ARE GETTING TO THE PLANT EXPANSION.

WE'RE GOING FROM THE 12 TO THE 24. WE DID HAVE A CHANCE THE EVENT OF THE CONTRACTORS. THERE WERE TWO THAT BID ON THE PROJECT.

X HAD A CHANCE TO CHECK ON THE OTHER ONE. MY THEY WERE NOT ABLE TO BUILD SOME BECAUSE THEY DID NOT HAVE MEMBRANE EXPERIENCE. THERE IS A LOT OF WORK THAT'S GOING ON. SO, WE FEEL COMFORTABLE WITH THIS CONTRACT AND WITH THE CONTRACT AS IT IS. WE ARE ASKING FOR ABOUT TWO AND HALF CONTINGENCY.

WHICH IS A 500,000 TOTAL OF $19,496,410. WITH THAT, I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS OR I CAN PULL UP THE PRESENTATION IF YOU WOULD LIKE.

I KNOW THE MAYOR AND COUNCILMAN SYBIL HAD SEEN THE PRESENTATION THE UTILITY ADVISORY BOARD

MEETING. >>AND IT IS HAS BEEN PLANNED OUT FOR A WHILE.

I JUST WANT TO REEMPHASIZE ANY OPPORTUNITY TO REEMPHASIZE THAT THIS IS COMING OUT OF THE FUND BUDGET WHICH IS PAID BY WATER AND SEWAGE USAGE. NOT OUT OF OUR PROPERTY TAX

BUCKET.>YES SIR, THAT IS CORRECT. >>JUST TO NOTE ÃÃTHIS ONE, TO PUT THE FACILITY AT MAX CAPACITY BASICALLY. WE ARE GOING TO REDO

SIGNIFICANT UPGRADES AND BUILD THE OTHER BILLING. >>WAKE HIM UP RIGHT NOW, WE HAVE THE PUMP STATION. IT IS BASICALLY CAPACITY WITH THE EXPANSION THAT WE DID RECENTLY TO 2 MILLION PER THAT EXPANDED THE PUMPS AND THE THIS ONE, WITH WHAT WE CAN HOUSE INSIDE THE MEMBRANE, WE WILL HAVE TO BUILD ANOTHER BUILDING THE PUMP STATION TO GET THE 24 MILLION IN THE FUTURE. I THINK THE NEXT ONE WILL PROBABLY START WORKING ON

EXPANSION AND PAYMENT AFTER THIS ONE IS COMPLETE. >>LET'S JUST KEEP DOING AND

KEEP THE UNDER BUDGET. >>KEEP IT LESS THAN EXPECTED. >>YES, SIR.

>>YES. OUNSEL? ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? TAKE A MOTION PLEASE. TAKE A SECOND.

>>HE TO PROVE. SECOND. >>THE ITEM PASSES 6Ä.

[2022-453]

>>THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ITEM 2022 53. CONSIDERING AND ACTING UPON THE

[01:00:03]

$1,800,000. >>I'M HERE ON THIS ONE. AS PART OF THE SELF-DEVELOPMENT, WHICH IS NOW CALLED CROSSROADS, THEY ARE PUTTING IN A WATER LINE FROM U.S. 67 20 FORT WORTH ROAD. THE ORIGINAL PLAN IS THAT THEIR INPUT IN 12 INCH WATER LINE THAT WOULD SERVE THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH SOME OF THE LINES WITHIN.

AS PART OF OUR IMPACT FEE OR WATER IMPACT FEE CIP. WE SHOW THAT LINE ACTUALLY BEING A 24 INCH LINE THAT WILL TIE INTO BOTH THE 16 AND THE 18.

THAT 67 THAT'S NOW AND THAT WILL CONTINUE TO THE NORTH OLD FORT WORTH ROAD AND ULTIMATELY GET TO THE ENTERTAINMENT PLANT IS OUR SECOND FEET. IN ORDER TO DO THAT, WE ARE LOOKING AT DOING THIS PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT WITH HILLWOOD.

THAT WOULD ALLOW FOR THE UPSIZING 12 INTO THE 24. WHICH FALLS IN LINE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS. IN MASTER PLANNING. AND SO, THE COST DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO IS A LITTLE OVER $1.7 MILLION. WE HAVE ASKED FOR LITTLE CONTINGENCIES. KISS TO COME ACROSS ANYTHING THAT'S INTERESTING THAT WE WOULD HAVE ONE .8 MILLION. THAT WE COULD PAY. THE COST FOR THE 12 INCH WAS A LITTLE OVER 600,000. SO, WE ARE ACTUALLY SAYING $600,000 TO GET THIS TO THE 24 INCH WATER LINE EVEN THOUGH WE ARE PAYING FOR THE DIFFERENCE. THIS IS A UTILITY FUND.

ITEM. SO, WE DO HAVE MONEY WITHIN THE WATER IMPACT FEE ELSE THAT WE CAN USE UP TO $1 MILLION AND OTHER $800,000 WOULD COME FROM OUR UTILITY SUPPORT SERVICES.

AGAIN, WHICH IS A UTILITY FUND ITEM. THAT WOULD BE HALF AN INCH ÃÃ

ANY QUESTIONS COUNCILMAN MAY HAVE? >>NO COMMENTS.

S THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE? >>SECOND. >>SECONDED.

[2022-454]

PLEASE VOTE. ITEM PASSES 6Ä. >>THANK YOU COUNSEL.

>>THANK YOU MIKE. >>ITEM 2022 Ã54. 454.

CONSIDER AND ACT UPON AN ORDINANCE IN THE CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN.

FISCAL YEAR 2022 2023 UTILITY FUND BUDGET. OR APPROPRIATIONS BY DECREASING UTILITY FUND FUND BALANCE IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,500,000. FOR THE AUGER WATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSIONS OF 24 MILLION GALLONS PER DAY PROJECT. IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 102.

LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE APPROPRIATE VARIOUS AMOUNTS OF REPEALING CONFLICTED ORDINANCES. AND RESOLUTIONS. INCLUDING SEVERABILITY FALLS,

AND ESTABLISH EFFECTIVE DATE. MA'AM? >>EVENING COUNSEL.

THIS IS A COMPANION AGENDA ITEM FEBRUARY 4, 1952. THAT MIKE AND CLYDE PRESENTED.

THIS BASICALLY, AS CHRIS MENTIONED EARLIER, THE EXPANSION PROJECT WAS ESTIMATED AROUND TO BE 24.5 MILLION. WE BUDGETED ACROSS THESE TWO YEARS.

THERE WAS 8,500,000 THAT WAS BUDGETED 21 AND 22. IT MILLION, WE HAVE INCLUDED IN THIS EIGHT YEAR BUDGET THAT WE ARE IN NOW. AND MDA AT THE LAST MEETING PROVED TO CONTRIBUTE $8 BILLION TOWARDS THE PROJECT. SO, THIS AGENDA ITEM IS JUST REALLOCATING THE AND EXPENDED BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS FROM LAST YEAR'S ADOPTED BUDGET TO OUR NEW BUDGET THIS YEAR. WE WILL NOT HAVE EXPENDED THOSE YET.

I WOULD BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >>COMMENTS, QUESTIONS, AND OR

[2022-455]

MOTION? >>MOVED TO APPROVE. >>MOVED TO PROVE SECOND.

PLEASE VOTE. >>ITEM PASSES 6Ä. >>THANK YOU.

>>THANK YOU. >>ITEM 22. 2022, 455.

CONSIDER AN ACT OF PUBLIC ORDINANCE IN THE CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN FISCAL YEAR 2022Ö023 GENERAL FUND BUDGET. APPROPRIATION AMOUNT OF $908,500 FROM THE UNRESERVED BALANCE FOR REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND APPROXIMATELY 87 ÃÃ87,120 SQUARE FEET.

TWO ACRES. LAND LOCATED AT THREE 3891 SHADY GROVE ROAD IN CLOSING

[01:05:01]

IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 102 LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE. APPROPRIATE VARIOUS AMOUNTS THEREOF. REVEAL CONFLICTED ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS INCLUDING A CERTAIN ABILITY CLAUSE AND ESTABLISH A DATE. MA'AM?

>>AGAIN, THIS IS FOR AN UNBUDGETED ITEM. AS THE MAYOR READ.

IT'S FOR THE FUTURE SITE OF FIRE STATION NUMBER FOUR. AND SO, WE INCLUDED THE PURCHASE PRICE AND ESTIMATE FOR CLOSING COSTS. SO, THE TOTAL AMOUNT IS 38 500 THAT WE ARE ASKING TO BE TAKEN FROM OUR UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE.AGAIN, I WILL ANSWER

ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE. >>SO MOVED.

>>SECOND. >>SO MOVED AND APPROVED. >>ITEM PASSES 6Ä.

[2022-456]

>>ITEM 22 456. CONSIDER AND ACT UPON THE ORDINANCE SUBMITTED IN THE CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN FISCAL YEAR 2022 2023. BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS.

IN THE AMOUNT OF $34,000 FROM THE UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE ACQUISITION OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CORNER OF NINTH STREET AND HIGHWAY 67. AND CLOSING COSTS FOR A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY ACQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FUTURE POLICE DEPARTMENT.

HEADQUARTERS FACILITY AND ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 102 OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT.

>>AGAIN, THIS IS FOR A PORTION OF THE LAND THAT IS BEING PURCHASED TO PROVIDE THE FULL SITE FOR OUR POLICE HEADQUARTERS THAT IS ABOUT TO BE CONSTRUCTED.

AND SO, THIS IS FOR THE PURCHASE PRICE AND A SMALL PORTION FOR THOSE CLOSING COSTS. I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

[2022-457]

>>BLAKE? >>SECOND. >>MOTION TO APPROVE.

SECONDED, PLEASE VOTE. ITEM PASSES 6Ä. ITEM 2022 457.

CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A WARNING CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $56,764.

TO CASTRO ROOF REPAIR AT THE SENIOR CENTER AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE

CONTRACT. MA'AM? >>THANK YOU MAYOR.

THIS IS FOR ROOF REPAIR THAT I BELIEVE THE SENIOR CENTER STAFF DISCOVERED IN JUNE.

IT GOT TO THE FINANCER PURCHASING AREA IN JULY. WE DID GO OUT AND ADVERTISE FOR THE BIDS IN LATE JULY AND GOT THOSE BIDS BACK. WE DID DO ALL OF THIS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATUTES. CASTRO, THIS SAYS THIS IS THE LOWEST BID. THAT ACTUALLY WAS NOT CORRECT. I REALIZED THIS.

AS I WAS LOOKING AT IT. I BELIEVE THEY WERE THE SECOND TO THE LOWEST.

THERE WAS A LOW BID THAT WAS EVALUATED BY A TEAM OF EMPLOYEES AND THEY DID NOT SPECIFY. I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY THAT. THIS IS CONSIDERED THE BEST VALUE BED AND CLOSEST TO WHAT WE BELIEVE WE NEEDED TO BE DONE.

THIS IS ONLY A PORTION OF THE ROOF AND THIS IS ONLY A PORTION IT'S BEEN THERE SINCE IT WAS BUILT ABOUT 20 YEARS AGO. THIS IS NEVER BEEN REPLACED. THERE ARE PIECES THAT HAVE BEEN REPLACED OVER TIME, BUT THIS PORTION HAS NOT. SO, THERE IS FUNDING AVAILABLE IN THE SENIOR CENTER FUND BALANCE OF ROUGHLY 25,000 THAT TIME PROPOSING THAT WE USE FROM THEIR FUND BALANCE.UT THERE IS ANOTHER 31,764 THAT WOULD COME FROM THE CITY MANAGERS CONTINGENCY FUND. TO COMPLETE THIS REPAIR. I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY

QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. >>JUST OUT OF CURIOSITY, WHY NOT GO AHEAD AND FILE ALL CLAIM

AND REPLACE THE ROOF? >>BECAUSE THE INSURANCE DEDUCTIBLE IS HIGHER THAN THE AMOUNT OF THE CLAIM. FOR WIND AND HAIL AND THAT'S WHAT THEY BELIEVE CAUSED IT.

SO FORTUNATELY. THAT'S WHAT'S BOGGING DOWN THAT DEDUCTIBLE.

WHEN WE WERE DOING INSURANCE. >>I JUST WANT TO ADD THAT I'M PERFECTLY OKAY WITH NOT ALWAYS GOING WITH THE LOWEST BID AND GOING TO THE BEST VALUE IF THERE IS CAUSE FOR THE AS YOU

STATED. >>WHY? I THINK IT WAS JUST A GROUP.

[01:10:01]

THIS IS NOT EVEN THE LOWEST, SO, THANK YOU. >>ABSOLUTELY.

DO WE HAVE A MOTION. >>MOTION TO APPROVE. >>SECOND.

[2022-458]

>>AND MOTION TO APPROVE.TEM PASSES 6Ä.

TEM 2022 458. CONSIDER AN ACT OF ORDINANCE. AMEND THE MIDLOTHIAN FISCAL YEAR 2022Ö023 SENIOR CITIZENS BUDGET APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000.

FROM THE UNRESERVED BALANCE OF THE SENIOR CITIZENS ROOF REPAIR.

BEING DONE BY CASTRO ROOF AND ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 102. MA'AM?

>> [INDISCERNIBLE] SO, THIS ONE WAS THE COMPANION TO THAT LAST ITEM AND IT IS PURELY AUTHORIZED IN THOSE TO USE EXCEPT THE 25,000 FROM THEIR BUDGET. AND THEN ALSO APPROPRIATING THE 31,764 FROM THE GENERAL FUND.

SO, AGAIN, I WILL ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE. >>A MOTION PLEASE?

>>MOTION TO APPROVE? >>MOTION TO APPROVE IT. SECOND.

[2022-459]

ITEM PASSES 6Ä. >>THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>THANK YOU.

ITEM 22 459. CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A SERVICE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN AND PROVIDE AIR CONDITIONING MAINTENANCE AND MINOR REPAIR FOR HEATING AND VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT CITYWIDE.

>>MAYOR COUNCIL, GOOD EVENING. THIS IS A CITYWIDE CONTRACT FOR BASICALLY THIS IS LOOKING FOR GENERAL MAINTENANCE ON OUR EXISTING AIR-CONDITIONING UNITS.

THEY ÃÃIF THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH A COST, ACQUITTED THE COMPLETE REPLACEMENT, WAS DEVELOPED FOR BIDS. THIS BID ADDRESSES IMMEDIATE EMERGENCIES AND NEEDS REPAIRS FOR MAINTENANCE ITEMS THROUGHOUT THE CITY. THERE ARE SOME SPECIALTY ITEMS THAT WE WORK FOR, BUT WE HANDLE THROUGH DIFFERENT PROVIDER. THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THERE ARE SOME CHANGES THAT MIGHT HAPPEN IN THE FUTURE, WE'RE GOING TO TRY AND GET THESE AIR-CONDITIONERS FUNCTIONAL AND EXTENT AS MUCH AS WE CAN. FOR EXAMPLE, THE CITY HALL.

I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. I'M HERE TO ANSWER. >>DO WE HAVE A MOTION PLEASE?

>>MOTION TO APPROVE? >>MOTION TO APPROVE AND SECONDED, PLEASE VOTE.

ITEM PASSES 6Ä. >>THANK YOU. THANK YOU MIKE.

[2022-460]

>>THANK YOU ADAM.>>ADAM? ONE PERSON OFF, SORRY. >>ITEM 2022 460.

CONSIDER AN ACT AND ACT UPON RESOLUTION PROVEN IN THE GRANT OF $400,000 TO BE AWARDED BY THE MIDLOTHIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION KNOWN AS TYPE B. TO STEPHEN ALBOM DOING BUSINESS WITH THE COMMERCIAL LEVEL C TO ASSIST IN THE FUNDING OF THE RELOCATION AND RESTORATIONS OF THE ANDERSON FARMHOUSE AS PART OF THE FOUNDERS RED PROJECT LOCATED IN THE 300 BLOCK OF EAST AVENUE G. MIDLOTHIAN TEXAS.

>>GOOD EVENING. TONIGHT WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR IS LOOKING AT MOVING AN OLD HOUSE. IT'S CALLED THE ANDERSON HOUSE. IT'S BEEN AROUND FOR MANY, MANY YEARS. WE ARE LOOKING AT SAVING THIS HOUSE INSTEAD OF LETTING THIS HOUSE BE TORN DOWN AND WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON AN AGREEMENT WITH STEPHEN ON THIS PROJECT.

E FINALLY GOT IT WORKED OUT WITH THE $400,000. IT DOES NOT PAY ALL THE MONEY UP FRONT. IT'S PART OF THE MONEY IS PAID IN INSTALLMENTS.

ONCE THE HOUSE IS MOVED, WE WILL PAY THE GUY WHO MOVED THE HOUSE.

AND HE HAS FIVE YEARS IN WHICH TO FINISH THE PROJECT. QUESTIONS?

>>IF HE DOESN'T FINISH THE PROJECT? HE SAID HE IS FIVE YEARS?

>>AT THE END OF FIVE YEARS, IF HE DOES NOT FINISH THE PROJECT, IT ACTUALLY TURNS INTO A LOAN.

AND THEN HE HAS TO START PAYING US. >>IS THAT THE SAME FOR THE

OTHER HOUSES? >>THE OTHER HOUSES HAD GRANTS OR SOMETHING ON IT INITIALLY.

>>CORRECT. SO, BASICALLY THE SAME STRUCTURE AS THE OF THE WOODS?

NO? >>THIS ONE IS DIFFERENT BECAUSE IF YOU DO NOT FINISH ON TIME, YOU CANNOT GET A GREAT EXTENSION. THERE ARE NO EXTENSIONS.

SO, IF IT'S NOT DONE ON TIME, THEN IT BECOMES A LOAN. >>BECAUSE AS YOU KNOW, WE DO A LOT OF EXTENSIONS ON GRANTS. SO, WE ARE AT A POINT WHERE WE WANT TO STOP THAT.

WE WOULD LIKE TO GET CONTRACTORS TO GET THE STUFF DONE AND LIKE WITH THIS DEAL

[01:15:03]

TO PICK A TIMEFRAME IN WHICH TO GO FORWARD WITH. >>I APPRECIATE YOU AND YOUR BOYS WORKING ON THIS. Y'ALL ARE KNOCKING THINGS OUT OF THE PARK.

IT'S GREATLY APPRECIATED. >>DO NOT LEAVE. SO, DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS OR

A MOTION? >>WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE. ALL, I'M EXCITED.

WE GET TO REPLACE A PIECE OF HISTORY. SO, IT'S ALWAYS EXCITING.

>>ALL RIGHT. >>MOTION TO APPROVE SECONDED. PLEASE VOTE.

ITEM PASSES 6Ä. >>STEPHEN, REALLY, WE HAVE ÃÃ ALAN

[INDISCERNIBLE] ON HAS A WAY TO INTRODUCE. >>ALYSSA BOWLER, SHE IS OUR NEW MANAGER OF THE MC DC. AND NOW WE HAVE A FOUR-TIME STAFF PERSON WHO CAN REALLY HELP US OUT. YOU KNOW? AND GET IS ACTUALLY MOVING FORWARD. WE'VE SEEN MANY THINGS THAT WE CAN CHANGE TO MAKE IT A LOT SMOOTHER. WITH US, MAKE IT SMOOTHER WITH THE NONPROFIT, AND WE ALSO SEE MANY THINGS AND WORKING WITH HER ESPECIALLY ÃTHIS WHERE WE CAN ACTUALLY HELP A LOT OF

NONPROFITS IN OUR TOWN TO MOVE FORWARD. >>SO, WELCOME.

[LAUGHTER] >>C LA WILL TURN OVER MY CONTACT INFORMATION.

>>STEPHEN SNUCK IN HERE [INDISCERNIBLE] >>THANKS SO MUCH.

I'M VERY EXCITED ABOUT SAVING THE ANDERSON HOUSE. >>THE SUN THANK YOU.

>>650 MONTGOMERY ROAD. MIDLOTHIAN ROAD. 20 2012, I'VE BEEN HERE SINCE 1997. WE ARE SUPER PROUD OFFENDERS WERE THAT ALL BECAUSE GET TO SEE IT. I WILL MAKE YOU PROUD WITH THE ANDERSON HOUSE.>THANK YOU.

MUCH THANK YOU. WE'RE GOING TO PUT IT NEXT TO THE CHURCH.

WE ARE PUSHING HARD TO GET THE CHURCH DOWN AT THE END OF THE YEAR.

THEY ARE MOVING IN AND OUT AND WE ARE WAITING ON A POWER CLEANER FOR THE ENCORE.

>>MAYOR, CAN I ASK HIM A QUESTION? >>PLEASE.

>>STEPHEN, I CANNOT REMEMBER, ARE Y'ALL HAVING SOME KIND OF A PLAQUE OR SOMETHING?

THAT TELLS WHAT EACH BUILDING IS? >>ABSOLUTELY.

SO, EVERY HOUSE HAS A BRONZE PLAQUE. IT'S NOT HISTORICALMARKER.

SOME OF THE HOUSES HAVE HISTORICAL MARKERS. ONCE YOU MOVE THEM, YOU MOVE THE MARKERS. YOU CANNOT PUT IT BACK, BUT EVERY HOUSE HAS A PLAQUE

[2022-461]

WHICH WILL BE ADDING. THEY WILL BE RIGHT ON THE FRONT DOOR.

YES, THANK YOU GUYS. >>THANK YOU. >>2022 461.

CONSIDER AND ACT UPON RECOMMENDATION FROM THE MIDLOTHIAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

TO IMPROVE THE LED POLICY MANUAL. >>GOOD EVENING MAYOR AND COUNCIL. IN JULY, [INDISCERNIBLE] OUR BYLAWS STATE THAT WE ADOPTED THE POLICY INCLUDED IN CITY POLICY ARE SEVERAL REGULATIONS THAT ARE SPECIFIC TO CITIES THAT ECONOMIC CORPORATIONS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO FOLLOW. WERE BROUGHT FORWARD A COUPLE DIFFERENT POLICIES.

ONE THAT CREATES TRANSPARENCY AND CREATES A SYSTEM BY WHICH WE SPEND TAXPAYER MONEY AND THAT WE CONTINUE TO TREAT THOSE FUNDS RESPECTFULLY. SO, INCLUDED IN THE MANUAL WE HAVE A TRAVEL POLICY AND THEN PURCHASING POLICY. THOSE, LIKE OTHER POLICIES, THEY OUTLINE THE GUIDELINES THAT MIDLOTHIAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WILL FOLLOW.NY POLICIES NOT INCLUDED WITHIN THIS SPECIFIC DOCUMENT, WE WILL DEFER TO THE CITY'S POLICY AND THOSE WILL BE FOLLOWED. ANY QUESTIONS THAT THE BOARD OR THE COUNCIL HAS?

>>WE HAVE AS LEADERS ÃÃKYLE HAS GONE OVER THIS AND WE HIGHLY RECOMMEND.

IT DOES NOT CHANGE OUR RELATIONSHIP. THEY STILL COME TO US.

SO, WITH THAT, IS THERE A MOTION? >>MOTION TO APPROVE.

[2022-462]

>>MOTION TO APPROVE. PLEASE VOTE. ITEM PASSES 6Ä.

>>THANKS FOR THAT. >>ITEM 22 462 CONSIDER AND ACT UPON DRAFT OF LETTER TO TEXT.

IN SUPPORT OF THE NORTHERN ALIGNMENT FOR FM 1387 REALIGNMENT PROJECT.

[01:20:04]

>>THANK YOU MAYOR. O, WE'RE GOING BACK TO 1387.

REMEMBER, WE HAD A WORKSHOP A WEEK AGO LAST TUESDAY. SEVERAL CITIZENS SHOWED UP AND I JUST KIND OF WANTED TO GO THROUGH ONCE AGAIN WHERE WE ARE AT WITH THIS.

SO, YOU SEE THE TWO ALIGNMENTS. THIS IS 1387 PER THIS IS LONG-RANGE ELEMENTARY HERE.

THIS IS THE SOUTHERN ALIGNMENT THAT GOES THROUGH THIS RIGHT-OF-WAY.

AND THEN THIS IS THE NORTHERN ALIGNMENT THAT GOES THROUGH THE CURRENT ALIGNMENT OF 1387.

AND A LITTLE BIT ÃÃI DID NOT KNOW HOW MUCH HISTORY IS KNOWN ABOUT THIS, BUT SEVERAL YEARS AGO, I BET ABOUT 20 YEARS AGO AT THE CITY OF ROCKS HEDGE AND ORANGE COUNTY IN NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS GOVERNMENT AND MIDLOTHIAN GOT TOGETHER AND CAME UP WITH THE THOROUGHFARE PLANT THAT CONNECTED THE NORTHERN PART OF MIDLOTHIAN 230 5E. THERE WAS A DESIRE TO GET AN ADJACENT OR EAST-WEST CONNECTION TO 35 OTHER THAN 287 TO PROVIDE MOBILITY AND TRANSPORTATION TO THE NORTHERN PART OF MIDLOTHIAN. BECAUSE WE THOUGHT THAT POINT, EVEN KNEW THAT THAT WAS GOING TO GROW AND GET LARGER AND THAT ALSO, THEY WANTED A NORTHERN ENTRANCE INTO MIDWAY AIRPORT. WE HAD A COG WHO SOME MODELING AND THEY DETERMINED THAT THE SOUTHERN ROUTE WAS OPTIMAL. OF COURSE MIDLOTHIAN ADOPTED IT BACK IN 07.

I THINK IT WAS ADOPTED EVEN PRIOR TO THAT.

LLIS COUNTY ADOPTED IT PROBABLY 2005. WITH THAT ROUTE UP HERE.

AND THIS IS 1387 CONNECTION TO THAT STAIRWELL. 35 E. STAIR WOOD ROAD.

I'M NOT SURE IF YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH THAT FIREWORKS STAND. AND THEN IT WALKS AHEAD TO ÃÃ THIS IS 2016 PER THIS WAS ADOPTED BACK IN 05 AND THIS KIND OF DESCRIBES HOW THAT WOULD CONNECT WITH BOB WHITE AND MULKEY ROADS OVER THERE AND THEN CONNECT WITH 35 FEET RIGHT THROUGH THERE. SO, IF YOU SEE THIS ALIGNMENT RIGHT HERE IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY THAT IS EXISTING THROUGH 1387. WHEN THESE ÃÃWHEN WE ALL KNOW, EXCUSE ME, WHEN PLOTS COME IN, IF THERE'S SOMETHING ON THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN, WE REQUIRE RIGHT AWAY A DEDICATION THERE. SO, BOTH THE NORTHERN SUBDIVISION AND SOUTHERN SUBDIVISION ARE DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THAT PORTION. AND THEN ALSO, THESE ARE THE PLATS THAT ARE DEDICATED. THEY ARE DEDICATED FOR FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF FM 1387.

I FORGET THE ONE TO THE SOUTH. CROPS CREEK. CROSS CREEK ONCE AGAIN TO DAVE DEDICATION UP THERE. AND THEN LITTLE CREEK FORM, WHICH IS A SMALLER SUBDIVISION.

THEY ALSO HAVE THE DEDICATION FOR THAT RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE TALK TO THE COUNTY JUDGE EARLIER TODAY. HE THINKS THEY'RE GOING TO HEAR IS NOT A PUBLIC HEARING.

A DISCUSSION, THE AFTER OCTOBER 18. WHICH I BELIEVE IS A WEEK AFTER TODAY. AT THE COMMISSIONERS COURT AND WITH THAT, I WILL ENTERTAIN ANY QUESTIONS IF I CAN ANSWER THEM. BASICALLY WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR IS TO PEN A LETTER TO TEXT.. SUPPORTING THE NORTHERN ROUTE ROAD AND SOUTHERN ROUTE ON 1387 TO THE ÃÃI GUESS THE ET J IN THE CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN.

CUSTOMÁ YOU HAVE YOUR ITEM 1ST?>I JUST WANT TO SAY THAT I HAVE LOOKED AT THIS FOR HOURS AND HOURS. I'VE ATTENDED MEETINGS. I WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH THE SOUTHERN ROUTE. THE NORTHERN ROUTE IS THE ONLY POSSIBILITY AS FAR AS I'M

CONCERNED. >>CLYDE, CAN YOU GO RIGHT BACK TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP? IF YOU SEE ME PUT MY GLASSES ON, I DID NOT BRING MY READING GLASSES.

>>IS THIS IT. IS THIS THE MAP THAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT?

>>YES SIR. >>NORMALLY IT'S IN THE PACKET. I'M NOT TRYING TO ÃÃ [INDISCERNIBLE] [LAUGHTER]

>>SO, MY QUESTION IS SO, WHAT HAPPENS TO THE ALREADY EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY? YOU KNOW, WE TALKED TO THE COUNTY.HAT'S ALL THAT'S IN THE ET J. IT'S NOT AND HOURS.

THAT'S NOT OUR FIRST CONCERN. THEY ARE NOT POSITIVE WHAT HAPPENS WITH THAT.

A LOT OF TIMES FROM THE CITY PERSPECTIVE, IF THERE IS AN ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAY, YOU CONTACT BOTH PROPERTY OWNERS THAT YOU WANT THIS REFUSAL. IF THEY DON'T WANT TO BUY IT, IT COULD END UP PATCHWORK. I NOTE THAT IF EVERYTHING STAYS RIGHT AND HOLY LIKE IT IS, I THINK ONE OF THE COMMISSIONERS WILL END UP HAVING TO MOLT THAT.

IT IS COUNTY PROPERTY. >>SO, OUR THOROUGHFARE PLAN CURRENTLY SHOWS A COMING IN.

>>YES SIR. >>SO, BE AND TJ DOES NOT NECESSARILY AFFECT

[01:25:02]

THOROUGHFARE? >>IT DOES, BUT WE DON'T PICK UP UNTIL FURTHER DOWN 1397.

>>WE PICK UP RIGHT HERE IN LONG BRANCH. SO, THAT IS THE EXTENT OF OUR CITY LIMITS RIGHT NOW AND RIGHT ALONG LONG BRANCH ROAD. SO ALL IS RIGHT AND HOLY AGAIN.

1387 WITHIN OUR CORPORATE LIMITS WILL NOT NECESSARILY CHANGE.

IT WILL CHANGE HOW WE ACCESS THE REST OF THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS IN ELLIS COUNTY.

>>IS AN ERROR ET J ALL THE WAY OVER 2664 OR OLD VILLA ROAD? >>664 VILLA ROAD.

>>I DID NOT KNOW WHERE THE ET J ÃÃI DON'T KNOW IF WE BEEN ET J MAP HERE.

MIKE, YOU CAN JUMP IN IF YOU SEE SOMETHING TO >>THE ALBANO 664.

I THINK THE ET J FOLLOWS THAT. I'M NOT 100 PERCENT SURE. >>RIGHT ON.

FOR YOUR PURPOSES ÃÃI THINK WHERE WE ARE LOOKING AT IS RIGHT HERE.

SO, THE ET J MIGHT FOLLOW THE NORTHERN EXTENT OF 664. BUT YOU KNOW IT'S GOT ALL THOSE DOCUMENTS AND I'M GONNA JUMP TO DIFFERENT MATH THAT WE CAN SEE EVEN BETTER.

IT LOOKS LIKE ACCORDING TO THAT MAP, THE ET J MIGHT AND RIGHT HERE.

OKAY. RIGHT. ALL THAT ÃÃNORTH-SOUTH ROUTE

IS 664 ON THE ROAD. >>MY ONLY QUESTION IS NORMALLY IN THE THOROUGHFARE, WE HAVE OUR ENGINEER TELL US IF IT'S GONNA WORK FOR PUBLIC SAFETY. AND THE ONLY REASON I HAVE A REALLY BIG QUESTION, I BELIEVE THIS IS ANOTHER MAJOR THOROUGHFARE ÃÃWHAT IS THIS?

80 THAT'S CAN BE TIED INTO THIS? >>IT'S NOT BLACKJACK, IT'S PLACEMENT. THAT CHANGING FROM THE SOUTHERN TO THE NORTHERN ROUTE OR LEAVING AS IT IS ARE GOING TO THE SOUTHERN ROUTE, IT'S A BETTER ALTERNATIVE ON HOW THOSE

TWO ROADS ARE GOING TO INTERSECT. >>IT'LL HAVE TO GET RECONFIGURED IF IT GOES WITH THE SOUTHERN, THERE WILL BE SOME RECONFIGURATION THAT WILL MAKE IT WORK AT THAT CONFIGURATION. THE ONE TERM AND YOU LOOK AT THE NORTHERN IS THAT YOU STILL HAVE THE S-CURVE THAT YOU WILL HAVE AND IT'S YOU REMAIN A MAJOR LARGE AREA. THEY ARE GOING TO BE SOFTENING THAT CURB, BUT DO NOT GET COMPANIES FROM ME OR THE CHURCH ON THAT. IF YOU SWITCH TO 664 ÃÃTHE ORIGINAL INTENT IS ÃÃWHAT CLYDE INDICATED IS TO HAVE A TRUE NORTH EAST AND WEST THOROUGHFARE TO GET BETWEEN 35 AND MIDLOTHIAN. INSTEAD OF EVERYTHING HAVING TO GO SOME BACK ROUTES OR 664 TO THE NORTH. OR TO THE SOUTH.R 287.

AND THAT WAS PRETTY MUCH IT. HAT WAS KIND OF DONE.

AGAIN, IT WAS ÃÃAT THE TIME, BARBARA WAS WITH ELLIS COUNTY. SHE WAS THE ONE WHO KIND OF PULLED ALL THE ENTITIES TOGETHER ALONG WITH COG TO LOOK AT THAT LINE.

>>ARE THERE ANY OTHER COMMENTS? IF YOU DO NOT MIND, I WOULD LIKE EVERYONE TO INDICATE THEIR PREFERENCE ON THIS. THE REQUEST IS FOR US TO SEND A LETTER TO TEXT STOP.

THE NORTHERN ROUTE ÃÃSUPPORT THE NORTHERN ROUTE. >>YES.

>>OKAY, SO, WHO WILL WRITE THE LETTER? >>WE WILL WRITE IT.

>>ALL OVER IT? >>DILUTE Y'ALL WANT TO MOTION?

[INDISCERNIBLE] >>SEE IF Y'ALL WANT TO ÃÃWE CAN DRAFT SOMETHING.

>>WE WILL HAVE SOME COUNCILMAN APPROVED. WE HAVE A COUPLE OF

COUNCILMEMBERS VOLUNTEER TO HELP WRITE THE LETTER. >>I'M SORRY MAYOR, BUT THE NEXT STEP WOULD BE THE WOULD BE THIS THOROUGHFARE CHANGE TO GO TO THE ZONING COMMISSION AND THEN COME TO Y'ALL. I THINK IT'S GOING TO HIT PNC IN OCTOBER.

I'M SORRY, NOVEMBER AND THAT IT WILL COME TO CITY COUNCIL SLIGHTLY IN DECEMBER.

>>IT'S IN A PUBLIC LETTER, CORRECT? >>NO SIR.

>>ARE PREFER THE LETTER TO BE DONE IN A PROVEN TIMELY FASHION.

>>I BELIEVE IT WILL BE. I THINK THE NEXT STEP IS THE ACTUAL THOROUGHFARE PLAN

CHANGE. >>IT'S A LITTLE SLOWER THAN EVERYBODY ELSE BECAUSE I WOULD

ALMOST RATHER HAVE PNC VOTE ON IT FIRST. >>WHY IS IT GOING BEFORE PNC

FIRST UNTIL NEXT WEEK? >>BECAUSE IT'S A PUBLIC HEARING AND EXTENT BY PUBLIC HEARING.

YOU HAVE TO PUT IN THE PAPER AND YOU GET SOME IT'S TIME TO ANNOUNCE AND EVERYTHING AFTER LAST TUESDAY'S MEETING, WE DID NOT HAVE ENOUGH TIME BECAUSE PNC IS NEXT TUESDAY.

>>OKAY. WHO WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION?

>>I WILL DO IT. >>OKAY, YOUR MOTION WILL ADDRESS THE LETTER AND COUNCILMEMBERS TO HELP WITH THE LETTER AND WHO WILL STAFF TAKE CARE OF?

[01:30:04]

PNC? >>WE HAVE A LIAISON SO, THEY CAN REPRESENT AS WELL.

>>I MAKE A MOTION FOR THE COUNCIL TO ADOPT OR SEND A LETTER TO TEXT.

TO CONFIRM THE NORTHERN ROUTE ON 1387. JOE, ANYTHING ELSE NEEDED?

>>STAFF WILL DROP THE COUNCIL REVIEW.>FOR STEPHANIE TO DRAFT A LETTER ON COUNCILMAN

LETTER ÃÃWITH SEVERAL COUNCILMAN LETTERS. >>WILL PUT AND JUSTIN.

[INDISCERNIBLE] >>DO WE HAVE A MOTION? >>SECOND.

>>SECOND. >>CAST YOUR VOTE. >>WE HAVE ONE LAST QUESTION.

>>STAFF IS STILL RECOMMENDING THE SOUTHERN ROUTE OR NORTHERN ROUTE? I KNOW WHAT YOU'RE ASKING, BUT I'M ASKING WITH THE CITY ENGINEER ÃÃWHO IS MORE

QUALIFIED THAN I AM ON THIS TOPIC. >>FROM A MOBILITY STANDPOINT, THE SOUTHERN ALIGNMENT IS WHAT WAS DECIDED UPON FOR YEARS. SO, THAT WOULD BE STAFF

PREFERENCE. >>THANK YOU. >>ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? PLEASE VOTE. COUNCILMAN, WE COULD GO TO AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND COVER THE REAL ESTATE ITEMS AND THEN COME BACK FOR THE PUBLIC ITEMS. IS THE JUDGE HERE?

[EXECUTIVE SESSION]

>>I DO NOT SEE HIM. I WILL CALL HIM. >>544 COUNCIL LEADS TO AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND FOLLOWING SECTIONS. SECTION 551.070 REAL ESTATE ÃÃ PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN. SECTION 551.087 TEST TEST ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DELIBERATION REGARDING COMMERCIAL AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM A BUSINESS PROSPECT AND WORK TO DELIBERATE OTHER FINANCIAL OR OTHER INCENTIVES TO BUSINESS PROJECT. PROJECT FEBRUARY 2, 2007.

SECTION 551074. PERSONAL MATTERS TO DELIBERATE .1 EVALUATION OKAY.

DISCIPLINE OR DISMISSAL PUBLIC OFFICERS. THE HR DEVELOPERS.

>>THE MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGES CAN DISCUSS AT THIS POINT. >>SECTION .501 174 PER PERSONAL MATTERS DELIBERATE THE EVALUATION AND DUTIES OF PUBLIC OFFICER I WENT POINT HE.HE

CITY MANAGER AND THE >>GOOD EVENING. IT'S 6:33.

THE CITY COUNCIL IS BACK IN SESSION. WE'VE HAD A WORKSHOP.

WE WENT AND DID THE REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS. AND NOW WE'RE GOING TO COME BACK AND DO THE PUBLIC AGENDA ITEMS. AND THE FIRST THING WE WOULD HEAR FROM CITIZENS TO BE HEARD. I WILL MAKE A COMMENT. I'M SORRY.

NO ACTIONS FROM THE EXECUTIVE SESSION LADIES AND GENTLEMEN. >>ON ADAM 22 AND 2022 AND 62.

A LETTER TO TAX AND SUPPORT OF THE NORTHERN ALIGNMENT FOR FM 1387 ÃÃWHY DID ARREOLA MOTION WAS CARRIED BY. BY COUNSEL SO THAT STAFF WILL BE WRITING A LETTER WITH THE PERFUME ÃÃTHE COUNCIL TO TEXT STOP. AND IN SUPPORT OF THE NORTHERN ROUTE. AND I BELIEVE ALSO THAT THE PROCESS WILL BE DONE TO MODIFY THE TRANSPORTATION PLAN. SO, COUNSEL DID THAT. IN THE FIRST PART OF THE

[2022-436]

[01:35:02]

IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK NOW. VICKI DILLOW. AGAIN, YOUR NAME, WERE LOCATED AND YOU WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES. I WILL GIVE YOU A 22ND

[INDISCERNIBLE] >>FIRST OF ALL, I'M VICKI LOWE. VICKI DILLOW.

OUTSIDE OF THE COUNTY, 7081 PAGE CLAIM. I WON'T EVEN NEED A 20 MINUTE WARNING. I WANT TO JUST TAKE A SECOND AND THANK EACH ONE OF YOU SO VERY, VERY VERY MUCH. FOR ALLOWING US TO COME FOR SETTING A WORKSHOP FOR LETTING US SHOW YOU THE DEVASTATION THAT THIS ROAD WILL SHOW. AND THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT AND I SAY THAT I STAND HERE IN ABOUT 300 400 PEOPLE AND WE JUST WANT TO

THANK YOU SO VERY, VERY MUCH. >>THANK YOU VICKI. >>ADRIAN LOTS.

>>AND AMY LEFT AT 2:51 BLACK CHAMP. I JUST WANT TO TAKE A MOMENT TO PERSONALLY SEE THANK YOU. WHERE WE ARE MOST GRATEFUL FOR ALL OF YOU LISTENING TO US IN HEARING OUR PLEA. FOR HAVING A WORKSHOP AND REVISING.

THERE PLANT TO REFLECT IN FAVOR OF THE FOURTH OPTION. A BEAUTIFUL PEACEFUL QUIET COUNTRY PROPERTY STATES LEAVE EVERYTHING TO US. THANK YOU TO ALL.

>>THANK YOU. I'VE TINA KING.

I KNOW THAT THERE ARE THREE OF YOU THAT WERE NOT AT THE WORKSHOP ON THE 1387 JUSTICE FIRST, LET ME STOP AND SAY THANK YOU FOR THE CONSIDERING AND HAVING THE WORKSHOP AND GOING INTO DETAIL WITH US. I WANT TO GIVE YOU FREE THIS BECAUSE THIS IS SHOWING THAT IT'S MORE THAN JUST A MAP ON THE ROAD. THIS IS HOW DEVASTATING IT WILL BE TO MY FAMILY. DISCOVERING MY PROPERTY HALF. NOT ONLY IS IT CUTTING MY PROPERTY IN HALF JUSTICE IT'S GOING TO TAKE ALL THE TREES THIS IS THE FIRST PICTURE YOU SEE IS THE RED PART AND OUR PROPERTY. THEN YOU WILL SEE WHERE THE SWIMMING POOL IS WHICH IS THE EASIEST THING TO SAY. FIRST PICTURE IS THE ACTUAL SWIMMING POOL IF YOU LOOK BEHIND THAT. ALL THOSE TREES WILL BE REMOVED BY THIS ROAD. WE CAN DO THIS QUICKLY BECAUSE I KNOW WE ONLY HAVE THREE MINUTES. FLIGHTS IF YOU LOOK FOR THE RED GREEN FLAG THE RED FLAG IS WHERE THE ROAD WILL COME THROUGH. ALL THOSE TREES WILL BE REMOVED. ONCE AGAIN JUSTICE THIS IS HOW CLOSE IT WILL COME TO OUR HOME.

THIS IS HOW CLOSE IT'S GOING TO BE TO TAKE THIS GRAZING RIGHT FOR OUR ANIMALS AWAY FROM I'M NOT SURE WHAT I WOULD DO WITH MY ANIMALS AT THAT POINT BECAUSE I WOULD BE UP TO WALK ACROSS THE FREEWAY TO GO FEED THEM. AND THEN ONCE AGAIN JUSTICE WAS TRYING TO SHOW YOU ALL THE TREES AND HOW DEVASTATING IT WOULD BE TO MY FAMILY.

YOU READ THIS REALLY QUICK. THE SPLITS ARE LAND IN HALF. WE HAVE NO ACCESS TO OUR CREEK.

SAFETY OF MY CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN AND ANIMALS WOULD BE AT RISK HERE.

THE SECURITY AND POSSIBILITY OF CRIME COMING INTO THE BACK OF MY PROPERTY IS MY BAR THE ANY POINT IN TIME WITHOUT US NEVER KNOW IF THAT THEY ARE COMING IN THERE.

ALWAYS, ACROSS FROM THE WINDOWS COMING THROUGH. QUALITY OF LIFE FOR OUR FAMILY.

LOSS OF GRAZING ACREAGE. TREES AND THE IMPACT ON WILDLIFE.

THE DECREASE IN PROPERTY VALUE IN THE TRASH ON THE ROADWAY THAT WOULD BE THAT OF DONNA PROPERTY. SO, I REALLY JUST WANTED YOU TO HEAR THAT BECAUSE I KNOW THAT REVIEW WERE NOT THE WORKSHOP AND ONCE AGAIN THANK YOU ALL FOR GIVING US TIME TO SPEAK

TODAY IS SINCERELY APPRECIATED. >>THANK YOU. THAT'S ALL THE SPEAKERS I HAVE SIGNED UP FOR CITIZENS TO BE HEARD. GOING TO THE PUBLIC ITEMS.

[2022-443]

PHASE 1 SUBDIVISION. >>THANK YOU MAYOR. BEFORE I GET STARTED IF YOU DON'T MIND JUSTICE I WANT ANSWERED THESE PEOPLE TO THE COUNCIL.

BRIAN DANCE OF. FRANK, HAD HIS HAND UP. PRIMER HERE, THE FIRST PERSON TO MY LEFT. BRIAN IS OUR NEW SINGER AND PLANNER.

HE'S BEEN WITH US JUST UNDER TWO MONTHS NOT PRETTY COMES TO US BY WAY OF CITY OF RED OAK

[01:40:03]

WE ARE MORE THAN HAPPY TO HAVE HIM HERE. DANCE SUBCODE.

SECOND PERSON TO MY LEFT IS BEEN HELPING US JUST PROVIDE ALL KINDS OF EXPERIENCE WITHIN ANY QUESTIONS THAT WE HAVE BECOME CLOSE BY WAY OF FREEZING AND NICHOLS.

HIS EXPERIENCE WORKING WITH MEMBERS NASA POLITIES. AS WELL AS PRIMARILY PUBLIC-SECTOR SIDE BUTTON. AGAIN, I JUST WANT TO INTRODUCE THESE TWO GENTLEMEN TO THE COUNCIL AS WELL AS THE PUBLIC HERE AS WELL.HANK YOU FOR THAT.

>>THANK YOU AND WELCOME. WE HAVE MET BEFORE, BUT NOT MET FORMALLY.

>>WITH THAT, WE WILL JUMP INTO OUR FIRST PUBLIC HEARING ITEM AGAIN.

OUR FIRST ITEM AND AGENDA ITEM 22 ÃÃ443. CASE NUMBER SU P 21Ö022Ä63.

AND THIS IS PROPOSED HOMEBUILDERS SIGN IN PHASE 1. AS YOU GUYS KNOW, AND HE HOMEBUILDERS SIGN THAT FACES ONTO THOROUGHFARE GREATER THAN ANY FEE AND WITH REQUEST SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO BE REVIEWED BY THE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL.WHICH IS WHY THIS CASE BEFORE YOU GUYS TONIGHT. S WE SEE ON THIS NEXT SLIDE, THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE VERSUS SIGN CAN BE 96 SQUARE FEET. BEING ROUGHLY 15 FEET TALL AND AGAIN JUSTICE MOCKINGBIRD SEES THAT YOU PUT WITH AND 90 FEET WIDE.

WHICH IS WHY THAT WEEK FIVE SU P. THIS HERE DEFEATS JUSTICE A LARGE SIDE OF WHAT THE HOMEBUILDERS WILL BE AT THE ZONING COMMISSION PLANS ZONING COMMISSION 7Ä2 RECOMMEND APPROVAL FOR THE CASE AND STAFF IS RECOMMENDED THE APPROVAL

PRESENT. >>COUNSEL, QUESTIONS, COMMENTS WERE OR A MOTION?

>>MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING? >>SECOND.

>>MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING PLEASE VOTE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED.

6Ä. >>WE HAVE QUESTIONS FOR A MOTION?

>>PLANE? >>HOW WILL IT SEND [INDISCERNIBLE] BOTH SONS. PRIOR ORDINANCE CANNOT BE UP UNTIL THE LAST LOT IS SOLD AND

FROM THAT POINT HAS A WEEK TO GO DOWN. >>THANK YOU.

>>I GUESS WE DON'T HAVE ANYONE THAT NECESSARILY FORCES CODE VIOLATION OTHER THAN COOK IS FOR ZONING VIOLATIONS. THIS IS WHAT NEW HIRE THAT WE HAVE NOT HEARD YET, BUT THE ONE

FOR THE ZONING VIOLATIONS WOULD HANDLE?HONE THROUGH? >>THE PHONE THROUGH ÃÃTHANK YOU. [INDISCERNIBLE]

>>ONLY TO MAKE MOTION TO APPROVE IS PRESENTED. >>MOTION TO APPROVE.

SECOND PLEASE VOTE. >>ITEM PESTS IS 60. OPEN ITEM 2022 444.

[2022-444]

20 JUSTICE 620 LOCATED IN THREE ZONING DISTRICT. COLBY?

>>THINK AMERICAN. OUR NEXT CASES FOR AGENDA ITEM 2022SS44 FOR CASE NUMBER SU P 2022Ä56. BUT MAKING A PROPOSED WATER WELL.

LOCATED AT THE 50 S. BOTTLENECK ROAD. THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES JUST UNDER 31 ACRES AT 30.9 ACRES. THERE IS EXISTING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY.

THE PROPERTY IS NOT AGRICULTURAL. ZONING ORDINANCE.

THE SEP IS REQUIRED FOR [INDISCERNIBLE] WILL BE CRITERIA ON THE LEFT-HAND SLIDE. ÃÃLEFT-HAND SIDE ON THIS SLIDE.

GAIN, SEP IS REQUIRING USE OF THE WATER WELL WATER PUMP USED SOLELY FOR IRRIGATING AND SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE PROPOSED CONNECTION AND ASSOCIATED PIPING WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LANDSCAPING IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR AND EQUIPPED WITH A BACKFLOW PREVENTER APPROVED BY THE CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN. THE WATER WILL BE CONNECTED TO OR BE OPERATED AS PART OF A PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM. AND GROUNDWATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT WILL NEED TO APPROVE THE REGISTRATION FOR THE PROPOSAL OF THE WATER FILTER AND THESE ASPIRATE ALL OF THESE ITEMS AND REQUIREMENTS.

NC FOCUSED 7Ä IN THE SEPTEMBER 20 ZONING MEETING TO APPROVE THE CASE AND STAFF IS

RECOMMENDING ALL PRESENTED. >>MESSAGE FROM COUNSEL? >>MOTION?

[01:45:03]

>>PLANE? >>THIS WATER STRICTLY FOR YOUR [INDISCERNIBLE]

>>YES SIR. OKAY. >>I LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO

APPROVE IS PRESENTED >>I'M SORRY. MAKE MOTION TO POSTPONE THE

PUBLIC HEARING. >>I WILL SECOND THAT PER >>THE MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC

HEARING. SECONDED, PLEASE VOTE. >>THERE'S ANY COMMENTS BLAKE?

WOULD YOU LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? >>I WOULD MAKE A MOTION TO

APPROVE APPROVE AS A SECOND FOR >>MOTION TO APPROVE A SECOND THAT.

[2022-445]

ITEM PASSES 6Ä. >>OPEN ITEM 22 4445. CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER AND ACT UPON REQUEST FROM SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR EXISTING UNIQUE WAREHOUSE.

FACILITY. AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW BUILDING OF SUBJECT PROPERTY.

THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY REZONED FOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICT THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 200

E. RIDGEWAY. COLBY? >>THINK AMERICAN.

AGENDA ITEM 2022SS45. PRAECIPE 20 FEBRUARY 20, 2022 DEBTS 171.

PLACEMENT IN MIDLOTHIAN. THIS IS PROPOSED FOR PARLIAMENT REQUEST.

THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS JUST OVER FOUR ACRES OF 4.083 ACRES AND THERE IS AN EXISTING STORAGE FACILITY ON THE SITE. STORAGE PLACEMENT IN MIDLOTHIAN IN THE CURRENT ZONING FOR THE

PROPERTY IS COMMERCIAL. >>BEFORE WE GET INTO THE PRESENTATION TEST IS WE DO WANT TO NOTE THAT HERE'S KIND OF THE PICTURE IF YOU WILL OF WHAT EXISTED PRIOR TO THE PROPOSED STORAGE UNIT. HERE'S WHAT WAS EXISTING PRIOR TO IT JUST KIND OF LOOK AT CARS AND VEHICLES THERE. AND SO, WE DO WANT TO KNOW IF THE APPLICANT ÃÃWHEN AN APPLICANT TOOK OVER THE PROPERTY IN OCTOBER 2021 2021 THE APPLICANT MOVED 21 ALL STORAGE CONTAINERS AND THE 20+ VEHICLES THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY LOCATED AT THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY. AGAIN THIS IS WHERE THE PROPOSED STORAGE UNIT IS GOING TO GO. AGAIN, THERE'S NO CURRENT SEP ON THE SITE.

THE DEVELOPMENT THIS PROPERTY PREDATES OUR CURRENT ZONING ORDINANCE WHICH IS THE REASON WHY THERE ISN'T ANY SU P. THE PROPOSED STORAGE BUILDING IS GONNA BE 16,200 SQUARE FEET AND 180 BY 90 BY 10 FEET TALL. INSTRUCTED AT BATTLE AND IF APPROVED, IT WOULD BE THE 11TH STORAGE BUILDING ON THE SITE. THIS NEXT LIKE THE PICS EIGHT CHART IN COMPARISON FOR COMMERCIAL CENTERS. THE APPLICANT IS MEETING ALL THE REQUIREMENTS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE NEXT ONE OF MOCK COVERAGE. SO, FOR COMMERCIAL STANDARDS, 80 PERCENT IS A MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE AND AS YOU SEE THE THIRD COLUMN.

ÃÃWITH THE ADDITION OF THIS PUBLIC IN 90 PERCENT WILL TOUCH ON THIS AGAIN HOWEVER WE DO NOTE THAT IT WOULD NOT THROUGH THE AREA COMPLETELY OUT OF CHARACTER TO THE AREA PRIOR TO WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED TONIGHT. SO, THIS IS THE VIEW FROM HENDERSON STREET.

THIS EXISTING TREES, WHICH IS SIX OAK TREES AND [INDISCERNIBLE] . PROPOSED AMONG THE PROPERTY. AND AGAIN, TWO PARENTS REQUEST.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING FOR JUSTICE MY GOSH, I CANNOT TALK. ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION REQUESTS. AS WELL AS A LOT COVERAGE REQUEST.

WE TOUCHED ON LOT COVERAGE JUST A SECOND AGO WITH A 90 A PERCENTAGE ON WHAT WOULD EXCEED THE 80 PERCENT. AN ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION. UE TO IT BEING JUST A FLAT ROOF AND WALL. IT IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH OUR ARCHITECTURAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ZONING ORDINANCE. SO, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE FROM THAT D&C.

RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST INCLUDING VARIANCES THAT IF APPROVAL IS

PRESENTED. >>QUESTIONS COUNSEL? >>DID YOU SEE THE LANDSCAPING

30 THERE? >>YES SIR. >>SIX FOOT MONARCH FENCE

EXISTING. OAK TREES ON THE PROPERTY. >>THREE HAVE MOTION?

TO CLOSE? >>AND MAKE IT CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING

>>MOTION TO CLOSE SECONDED. PLEASE VOTE. >>THE ITEM IS CLOSED.

COUNSEL, WILL MAKE A MOTION? >>?ELECTED AERIAL VIEW? >>IS THAT THE LIST OF THEIR?

WHAT'S THAT IS MOVED. >>THAT WAS AN ACTUAL 21 ALL STORAGE CONTAINER.

PARKED VEHICLES ALONG HERE. IT WAS JUST JUST AS THE ROOF COVERS.

IT WAS AN ACTUAL BUILDING. >>IT WAS AN EXISTING GOAL STORAGE CONTAINERS.

ONE STATE TOOK OVER JUST JUST ENTERED THE PROPOSAL INDOORS JUSTICE IN THE PATROL BUILDING.

>>WHEN THEY ARE ALREADY EXCEEDING THE 98. PRESENT LOT COVERAGE ÃTHIS

[01:50:12]

BUT WITH THIS JUSTICE THEY WERE AT LEAST EXCEEDING THE 90 PERCENT OF IT.

I WOULD NOT SAY THAT THEY WERE IN THE 98 PERCENT. THERE IS EXCEEDING 90 PERCENT LOT COVERAGE WITH THIS HERE. THIS BUILDING PROPOSAL BACK IN 98 PERCENT.

BOX STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL EVEN WITH ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION.

APPEARANCE. >>YES SIR, THAT'S A STANDARD IF YOU WOULD STORAGE GOING.

SO, WE ARE: NOT TALK ABOUT THAT WHAT ACTUALLY LOOKS BETTER FROM STATE STANDPOINT.

FROM WHAT'S STANDING THERE IN SURROUNDING AND USE OF THIS STORES ALREADY ON SITE.

>>YOU HAVE A MOTION PLEASE? >>MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. >>IS THERE SECOND?

>>MOTION TO APPROVE SECOND PLEASE VOTE. ITEM PASSES 6Ä.

[2022-446]

>>BEAR WITH ME. (2022 446. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER INACTIVE PUBLIC ORDINANCE EXCEPT IN THE PETITION FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION. AND AN EXIT TO THE CORPORATE CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN TEXAS.

APPROXIMATELY FIVE ACRES OF LAND. SITUATED IN MIDLOTHIAN HEALTHY SURVEY 593 WITH AN EXTRA TERRITORY THE CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN ELLIS COUNTY TEXAS.

AS FURTHER DESCRIBED AND DEPICTED IN EXHIBIT A THAT'S JUST A TEST HERETO.

EXTENDED IN BELLEVUE LIMITS IN THE CITY TO INCLUDE ANNEX PROPERTY.

WITHIN THE CITY'S LIMITS. GRANTED ALL INHABITANTS AND ANNEX PROPERTY ALL THE RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES OF OTHER CITIZENS PROVIDED THE INHABITANTS PROPERTY ALL TO THE X ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS OF THE CITY.ITHOUT THE SERVICE PLAN FOR THE ANNEX PROPERTY.

THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF JONES ROAD. NORTH OF HIGHWAY 67.

COLBY? >>YES SIR. >>AGAIN MY NEXT CASE FOR THIS EVENING IS FOR AGENDA ITEM 2020 TOOTS Ã46. CASE NUMBERS 8X01 Ã2022.

Ã172. THIS IS FOR PROPOSED VOLUNTEER ANNEXATION REQUEST.

>>ME AS YOU STATE THIS IS ALONG DAVY JONES WROTE IN PART ORDINANCE ANNEXATION OF ANY TIP IS REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED AND ULTIMATELY APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL, WHICH IS WHY THIS CASE IS BEFORE YESTERDAY. SO FOR .96 ACRES. IN THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY LIMITS TO ALLOW INTERDEPARTMENT OF ULTIMATELY NEXT STEPS IF COUNSEL CHOOSES TO APPROVE THIS VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION TONIGHT.

THE APPLICANT WILL THEN COME BACK BEFORE ON A DIFFERENT CYCLE BEFORE PNC AND BE CANCELED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT THAT THEY ARE PROPOSING WITHIN THE AREA.

>>QUESTIONS? >>JUST A MOTION. >>JUST A MOTION.

A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING? >>SECOND.

>>SECOND. >>PLEASE VOTE. THE ITEM IS CLOSED 6Ä PER

>>FOR CODIFICATION, YOU'RE ASKING FOR THE PETITION FOR THE ANNEXATION ÃTHIS

[INDISCERNIBLE] >>YES SIR. >>I WANTED TO DO MY READING.

>>YES SIR. >>ALL RIGHT.

CUSTOMÁ YOU HAVE A MOTION PLEASE? >>I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.

>>SECOND. >>MOTION TO APPROPRIATE SECONDED.

PLEASE VOTE. ITEM PASSES 6Ä.

[2022-447]

>>THIS BEGINS WITH AGENDA ITEM IN THIS MAGAZINE 37Ö022Ä45. THIS IS FOR PROPOSED INFLUX DUPLEX DEVELOPMENT FOR EUV PD LOCATED AT 407 S. STREET. USING A SLIDE HERE ÃTHIS AGAIN AT 43 SOUTH SIXTH STREET UNDER HALF AN ACRE ZERO 33 ACRES SUBJECT PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY UNDER DEVELOPMENT. AND AGAIN THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE THE PUBLIC APPLICANT FOR OUR THREE RESIDENTIAL THROUGH TO YOU PETE PD TO ALLOW FOR THE USE OF DUPLEXES IN THE PROPERTY. THIS THE PICS THE LAYOUT PLAN.

AGAIN, THIS CAN BE PROPOSED IN CONSISTING OF TWO UNITS BEING 3700 SQUARE FEET TOTAL UNIT

[01:55:06]

1000 UNIT BE TO THE RIGHT. 1001 982 SQUARE FEET. CONSISTS OF TWO BEDROOMS TWO BATH KITCHEN AND LIVING ROOM. S WELL AS TWO CAR GARAGE. SHE'S ME JUSTICE ON THE NEXT LIGHT DEPICTS AN ELEVATED SIDE PLAN TO THE HIGHEST POINT IS 25 FEET TALL.

CONSISTENT WITH PORTED MATERIAL AND SO'S FIBER CEMENT SIDING. IN THESE NEXT FEW SLIDES DEPICT RENDERINGS OF WHAT WOULD BE PROPOSED TO LOOK LIKE. SO THE LAST FLIGHT WAS RENDERED SLIGHT SIDE HUNDRED AND SIDE RENDERING. SO, JUST TO SHOW YOU THE CERAMIC LOT LAYOUT. OUTLINED IN THE CHAIR IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR THE MOST PART THIS IS EVERYTHING IS SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ROUNDED WITH THE EXCEPTION OF TWO PINK DOTS IN THE DUPLEX WHAT YOU SEE AT THE BOTTOM LEFT-HAND SCREEN.

SELF-ANALYSIS JUSTICE WE ARE ULTIMATELY RECOMMENDED A PROGRAM FOR THIS AND AS YOU SEE, I FREQUENTS CONSISTENCY WITH THE FUTURE WHEN PLAN FUTURE WHEN PLAN IS THE MODULE ÃÃWHICH IS WHICH REQUIRES THE DEVELOPER TO BE CONSISTENT AND HISTORICALLY SURROUNDED AREA.

ALSO ENCOURAGING THE LANDFILL, WHICH IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD APPLY HERE.

LOCATION IS NOT BETWEEN ANY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES. BASED ON THE AERIAL ADJACENT TO THE RAILROAD. SO, IT WOULD NOT INTERRUPT THE SINGLETON HOMES.

ALSO NEIGHBORS SUPPORT DEFICIT WHICH IS SOMETHING THAT WE WILL TOUCH ON HERE IN A SECOND.

WE SAID A LOT OF NEIGHBORS SUPPORT FROM THE SURROUNDING AREA.

WHICH IS ALSO WHEN YOU WANT TO KNOW THE STAFF RECEIVED MORE OFFICIAL LETTERS OF SUPPORT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT PROVIDED A LETTER OF SEVEN ADDITIONAL SIGNATURES WILL BRING THE TOTAL TO 11 KINDA METHOD OUT HERE. SO, FORGIVE ALL THE COLORS.

WE RECEIVED 11 TOTAL PART ONE IS IN SEAN BECAUSE IT'S KIND OF TESTED SORRY ÃTHIS ONE IS KIND OF NORTH. IT'S JUST NUMB TO OUTLINED PURPLE THAT WE RECEIVED BY EMAIL. TWO AND RED WERE SUBMITTED BY EMAIL AND ASSIGNED A LETTER TO THE LEFT. SIX IN GREEN. WE'RE ALL JUST SIGNED BY THE LETTER AND AGAIN THIS IS ONE YELLOW WHICH IS HARD TO READ. IT WAS NOT SHOWN IN THE PROPERTY. HOWEVER BRINGS THE TOTAL TO 11 SIGNATURES OF SUPPORT.

PNC VOTED 7Ä2. THE CASE IS PRESENTED AND AGAIN, STAFF IS RECOMMENDING

APPROVAL IS PRESENTED. >>JUST TO BE CLEAR JUSTICE YOU MADE MENTION THAT I WAS LOOKING AT THERE IS A HOUSE THERE CURRENTLY THAT JUSTICE THERE USED TO BE THE APPLICANT REMOVE

THE HOME AND SO, CURRENTLY VACANT. >>THANK YOU.

>>WE HAVE A MOTION? >>AND MAKE MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.

>>SECOND. >>CLOSE SECOND. CLOSE ITEM PASSES 6Ä.

COMMENTS? OR I WILL TAKE A MOTION? >>EXPLAINED, IS STEP RECOMMENDED APPROVAL BECAUSE IT'S CONSISTENT WITH WHAT'S AROUND IT.

BUT THERE'S ONLY ONE SET OF DUPLEXES AROUND. THE REST IS CAN BE

SINGLE-FAMILY. >>YES SIR. THERE'S ONLY ONE OF DUPLEXES AROUND IT. IN REFERENCE TO THE FUTURE LAND WE SUBMIT JUSTICE THE PLAN.

BEING ORIGINAL TOWN MODULE. IT ENCOURAGES INFIELD, WHICH IS SOMETHING THAT IS ENCOURAGING THE DEVELOPMENT OR VACANT LOTS AROUND. JUST INVOLVEMENT WHICH APPLIES HERE. ALSO WE BELIEVE IT'S CONSISTENT HISTORIC CHARACTER OF THE SURROUNDING AREA. LOCATION AND GOING BACK TO THE I WILL JUST USE THIS ONE HERE.

NOT LOCATED IN BETWEEN THE ROOM SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES. IT'S LOCATED ON THE EDGE HERE.

IT'S ALL RAILROAD. WHICH ALSO PLAYED A PART. ALSO JUST NEIGHBOR SUPPORT.

OF THOSE HOMES THAT WE SAW. CERTAINLY THE PROPERTY. SUBMITTED LETTERS IN SUPPORT AS WELL. THAT ALSO PLAYED A PART. SO ALL THOSE PARTS PLAY POINT INTO OUR ORGANIZATION FOR APPROVAL.

CUSTOMÁ SORRY. [INDISCERNIBLE]

>>GO AHEAD. >>SORRY. >>WE HAVE ANYMORE SPEAKERS?

>>THE APPLICANT IS HERE AS WELL. >>JUST ADD ON TO WHAT YOU'RE SAYING, YOU CAN ULTIMATELY SUGGEST APPROVAL. SO DID ALL THOSE THINGS HAVE TO

BUILD IN ORDER FOR YOU TO GET THERE? >>THAT'S WHAT HE WILL PLAYABLE INTO US RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. NEIGHBORHOOD SUPPORT ISN'T NECESSARILY MAKING A DECISION ONE WAY OR ANOTHER, BUT IT DOES HELP IF SURROUNDING NEIGHBORS WERE ÃÃAS HE POINTED OUT ÃÃ THE NEXT POINT OF DUPLEXES WERE FURTHER DOWN THESE PINK DOTS HERE.

SO EVERYTHING ELSE IS FOR THE MOST PART, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES.

SO, FOR ALL THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORS TO CITE WE ARE GOING SUPPORT THE APPLICANT WENT

[02:00:02]

THIS DID PLAY APARTMENT TO THOSE TWO OTHER POINTS THAT YOU MENTIONED TEST'S CONSISTENCY IN

THE FUTURE LOSE PLAN PLAYED A PART IN IT TO AS WELL. >>ECHOES WITH WHAT'S SUPPOSED TO GO THERE. ACCORDING TO THE [INDISCERNIBLE]

WITH THE ORIGINAL >>EXAM QUESTION ON THAT. THE PLAINTIFFS ENCOURAGED INFILL DEVELOPMENT, BUT I DON'T REMEMBER IT SPECIFICALLY CALLING OUT MULTIFAMILY INFILL DEVELOPMENT. AND I GUESS IT'S EXISTING USES ARE THREE, RIGHT? IS WHAT WAS ARTISANAL FAMILY HOME PRIOR TO THE DUPLEX ÃÃ CORRECT PICK >IT WAS SINGLE-FAMILY HOME IN THERE THAT WAS VACANT FOR 10 YEARS? AT LEAST?

>>12 YEARS, MA'AM, I'M SORRY, THE APPLICANT MINIMUM 12 YEARS IN THE AFRICAN CAME OVER.

>>LESS THAN THAT, BECAUSE I'VE BEEN IN THE HOUSE. >>SARCOMA ONE OF THE APPLICANT.

IT WAS VACANT FOR SEVERAL YEARS. THE APPLICANT AND THEN THEN TOOK OVER AND REMOVED THE HOME THAT WAS THERE. SORRY, I FORGOT WHERE I WAS

GOING >>FORGET WHAT THE QUESTION WAS PER THE ORIGINAL TOWN MODULE DOES ENCOURAGE HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT AND AN FILLED TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT.

>>IT DOES NOT SPECIFICALLY CALL THAT CALL IT MULTIFAMILY PICK >>IT DOES NOT SPECIFICALLY CALL

OUT MULTIFAMILY, YOU'RE CORRECT. >>MARY, IF THERE IS NO OTHER COMMENTS ÃTHIS PUBLIC TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE AS PRESENTED.

>>MOTION TO APPROVE THIS DISH NOT SOMEONE HAS A COMMENT. >>AMENDED QUESTION.

WITH ALL THE JOINTS HE PUT UP JUSTICE I CANNOT SEE EXACTLY WHAT THIS BULLY WAS.

>>YES SIR. SO, I SEE THAT. >>

>> >>THIS IS THE LOCATION HERE? 43 S. SIXTH STREET.

>>DON'T GIVE ME THAT. >>NOT THE WHEN YOU LOOKING AT? >>NOT THE SLOT.

NOT THIS BLOCK. >>ALL THE DOTS. SORRY.

THIS ONE. >>THAT ONE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS HERE.

>>YES. THESE 28 DOTS. >>YOU GET THE RAILROAD IS

EXCRETED. >>I GOT IT NOW. >>SORRY ABOUT THAT.

>>WE HAVE A MOTION? IS THERE SECOND? >>MIGHT BE A SECOND.

>>A SECOND, ALL RIGHT. PLEASE VOTE MOTION TO APPROVE SECONDED.

>>THE IMPASSES 5Ä. OPEN ITEM 2022 448. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND

[2022-448]

DISTRICT NUMBER 160. COLBY? >>THANK YOU THERE AGAIN.

>>IN THE SUN >>THANK YOU MARY. >>OUR NEXT GUEST FOR THIS EVENING IS CASE NUMBER 2022Ö48 FOR CASE NUMBER Z 43. 2022Ä68 AND THIS IS FOR SOME CHANGE FROM OUR THREE RESIDENTIAL 32 UDP B. LOCATED AT 501 W. AVENUE F. AS YOU SEE ON THE SLIDE HERE ÃÃIT'S A PROPOSALS ARE IN CHANGE FOR OFFICE USE AS WE GET THE IMAGE TO THE RIGHT. THIS IS AN EXISTING CHURCH OF FORMIC CHRISTCHURCH.

AGAIN, FIBER ONE WEST AVENUE F UNDER HALF AN ACRE 0.342 ACRES AND THEN THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM OUR 32 YOU PPD AND ALL IT USES.

>>AS YOU CAN SEE THIS NEXT SLIDE, AGAIN, THE OFFICE USE THE EXISTING PRIMARY BUILDING FOR THE CHURCH WILL REMAIN THE SAME. HOWEVER, BUILDING TWO IT WILL CHANGE, WHICH WILL HERE ON A SECOND. AGAIN, PROPOSE OFFICE 17 ASPHALT PARKING SPACES BECAUSE EVERYTHING IN WHITE SKIN TO BE THE NEW PROPOSED 17 PARKING SPACES AGAIN. AS WELL. TOTAL, THAT MAKE 36 TOTAL SPACES. EXISTING CRCÁPE MYRTLE TREES OR ME ON THE PROPERTY.

FOR THE NEW ENTRIES WILL BE PROPOSED ALONG THE SIDE AND FRONT OF THE PROPERTY AS WELL.

AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, THE BUILDING ONE, WHICH IS HERE Ã JUST THAT WILL REMAIN THE SAME, HOWEVER BUILDING NUMBER TWO AT THE TOP ÃÃHERE IS THE EXISTING ELEVATION RIGHT HERE ON THE RIGHT-HAND SIDE AND ALONG THE LEFT-HAND SIDE, HE SEE THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING NEW STONE AND WINDOWS. IT MIGHT FACE [INDISCERNIBLE] SIDE OF THE BUILDING IF YOU WILL.

NO OTHER PART OF THE BUILDING WILL BE TAKEN DOWN IN ANY WAY. JUST INSTALL NEW WINDOWS ON THE

[02:05:02]

AND STAFF HAS RECOMMENDED APPROVAL IS PRESENTED. >>THE NORTH BUILDING ÃÃTHEY WILL BE SAME USE OF PROFESSIONAL USE?>IT WILL BE ALL OFFICE, THE ONLY CHANGES GOING TO BE ÃÃTHEY ARE GOING TO ADD MORE STONE TO THE BUILDING.

SO, TO THE RIGHT IS THE EXISTING OUTLOOKS NOW AND TO THE LEFT IS STONE IN WINDOWS.

BUT THE BUILDING WILL NOT BE AFFECTED IN ANY OTHER WAY. >>USE THE PARKING ALONG AVENUE

F IS GOING TO BE ASPHALT OR CONCRETE? >>IS CAN BE ASPHALT.

SO, ALONG HERE IS EXISTING AND EVERYTHING IS GOING TO BE 17 PARKING SPACES, WHICH WILL BRING THE TOTAL TO 36. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? IS THERE A MOTION TO CLOSE?

>>MOTION TO CLOSE. >>SECOND. >>MOTION TO CLOSE AND SECONDED, PLEASE VOTE. ITEM PASSES 5Ä.

COMMENTS FROM COUNSEL? OR MOTION? >>I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A COMMENT. I GET EXCITED ABOUT REDEVELOPMENT OF DOWNTOWN AND I THINK THIS WILL BE A MUCH NEEDED OVERHAUL TO THESE FACILITIES.

WITH THAT, I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. >>SECOND.

>>MOTION TO APPROVE, SECONDED. PLEASE VOTE. >>ITEM PASSES 5Ä.

[2022-449]

JONES. COLBY? >>COLBY, THANK YOU MAYOR.

AGENDA ITEM 2022SS49 PER FOR CASE NUMBER Z 40 Ã2022 Ã157. THIS IS FOR ROCKPORT PARKWAY DEVELOPMENT WITHIN PD 106. COUNSEL, AS YOU KNOW, EVERYTHING WITHIN PD 106 ÃTHIS ANY NEW DEVELOPMENT WITHIN ROCKPORT PARKWAY DEVELOPMENT REQUIRES AN AMENDMENT TO THE PD IS REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND APPROVAL BY CITY COUNCIL. AS YOU SEE HER, THIS NEXT SLIDE AND THE NEXT LEVEL, SO YOU GUYS HEAR THE AERIAL VIEW OF WHAT'S GOING ON NOW AND WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED.

IN THE MIDDLE PHASE 1 AND TWO Ã THIS HIGHWAY AT 67 IS ALONG TO THE RIGHT HAND SIDE.

PHASE 3 IS GOING TO BE WHAT'S ALONG THIS LEFT-HAND SIDE HERE IN THE ANOTHER VIEWPOINT PHASE 3 TO THE BOTTOM RIGHT HAND SIDE. U.S. I WAS 67.

TO THE FAR LEFT-HAND SIDE THERE. SO AGAIN, EVERY AMENDMENT TO PD 106 IS REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED OR APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL. THE ÃÃTHIS IS A PROPOSED PHASE 3 EXPANSION FOR SHAKA. ONCE THE EXPANSION WILL CONSIST OF THE CB EXPANSION ADDITIONAL COOLING TOWERS, MAKEUP WATER TANKS AND PRE-ENGINEERED CHEMICAL TREATMENT:.

ADDITIONAL GENERATORS WILL BE ADDED TO THE GENERATOR YARDS AND SUPPORT PHASE 3 IN THE FUTURE SUBSTATION IS PROPOSED. AGAIN, OUTLINED IS THE PHASE 3 AREA THAT WE CAN HAVE WITH PHASES ONE AND TWO TO THE LEFT-HAND SIDE. EXCUSE THE COLORS, THE RAINBOW COLORS ÃÃJUST TRY TO HELP BREAK DOWN. OUTLINED IN BLUE HERE REPRESENTS THE EXPANSION CONSISTING OF 29,000 SQUARE FEET.

OUTLINED IN ORANGE HERE IS GOING TO BE THE DATA CENTER. IN 288,600 SQUARE FEET TOTAL OUTLINED IN GREEN WILL BE THE MODULAR ELECTRIC BUILDINGS BEING 14,000 THESE TWO HERE AND THEN THE 2800 SQUARE FOOT ONE IS GOING TO BE RIGHT HERE. OUTLINED IN PURPLES GOING TO BE WHERE THE GENERATORS ARE LOCATED AND THAT OUTLINED IN RED AT THE BOTTOM IS WHERE PROPOSED FUTURE SUBSTATION WILL BE. THIS NEXT SLIDE DEPICTS THE ELEVATION OF SIDE PLANS. STANDARD CONCRETE MATERIAL, WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH PHASE 1 OR TWO OF THE DEVELOPMENT. HE ONLY DIFFERENCE IS THAT THIS IS GOING TO BE ONE STORY AS OPPOSED TO TWO STORIES AND PHASES ONE AND TWO.

ALL THE APPLICANTS AND PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN NORTH AND THE REASONING AND AGAIN, STAFF, SORRY, PLANNING ZONE COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL 70 OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND AGAIN, STAFF IS

RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. >>IS THERE A APPLICANT?

[02:10:01]

>>DOESN'T APPLICANT WISH TO SPEAK?OUR NAME AND THE ORGANIZATION YOU ARE WITH.

>>MINIMUS DRIVE TRUCK. I AM WITH HDR. ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER OF

RECORD. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? >>KELSEY, DO YOU HAVE

QUESTIONS? >>HOW MANY SQUARE FEET YOU HAVE?

>>JUST IN THE 300,000 SQUARE FEET. IT'S ABOUT THE SAME SQUARE FOOTAGE AS PHASE 1 AND PHASE 2. EXCEPT THIS IS A ONE-STORY BUILDING.

THE REASON THAT THIS IS ONE STORY IS BECAUSE IT'S A NEW DESIGN.

THEY WENT FROM TWO STORIES TO ONE-STORY AND THEY IMPLEMENT THE SAME DESIGN NATIONWIDE.

>>WHAT'S THE SQUARE FOOTAGE? >>YES SIR. >>OKAY.

CUSTOMÁ I DON'T THINK WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. UNLESS YOU CAN THINK OF ANY PARTICULAR MUCH. WE ARE VERY EXCITED. WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE POINT

>>MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING? >>SECOND.

>>CLOSED SECOND. PLEASE VOTE. ITEM PASSES 6Ä.

IF THERE'S NO COMMAS OR QUESTIONS, I WILL TAKE A MOTION.

>>MOTION TO APPROVE? >>MOTION TO APPROVE. SECONDED.

PLEASE VOTE. ITEM PASSES 6Ä. ONTO THE NEXT TWO ITEMS, WE WILL HAVE ONE SPEAKER EACH. I WILL HAVE THE THEM INTRODUCED AND THEN WE WILL HEAR THE

[2022-450]

CONSIDERED AND ACTED UPON THE >>2021 PANSY VOTED TO CONTINUE THE CASE TO THE FEBRUARY 15, 2022 PLAIN ZONING MEETING. ON FEBRUARY 1, THE APPLICANT MET WITH CITY COUNCIL AND THE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION TO JOIN A WORKSHOP SESSION THAT WILL BREAK DOWN ANY FURTHER CONCERNS FOR RELATED TO THE HEALTH AND NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL.

ON FEBRUARY 15 ÃÃTHE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION OFFERED TO DENY CASE NUMBER OR DENY THE CASE NUMBER AT THE TIME. APRIL 6 ÃÃTHE APPLICANT REQUESTED WITHDRAWAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL FROM THIS

[02:17:55]

>>WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE ITEMS THAT I JUST MENTIONED. DATA CENTER STP, THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WE WERE RELYING HEAVILY ON. IT FELT RIGHT ALLOWING TO PERMIT OUR RIGHTS OF THE APPLICANT AGREED THAT SEP FOR THAT.

TIA INCREASE THE TIA TO MANUFACTURING, WHICH IS A LITTLE BIT HEAVIER THAN STANDARD WAREHOUSE.PPLICANT WILL BE ABLE TO WRITE TO THE ROAD AND LASTLY, IN RELATION TO THAT SECTION C THAT I MENTIONED. PROVIDING THE ROADWAY 1000 FEET TO FROM US 760 ROAD. ALL THESE PLAY .2 OUR RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT. PNC VOTED 70 AT THE UNITED SEPTEMBER 20 MEETING.

ANOTHER POINT I WANT TO ADD IS THE MARRIAGE THAT YOU MENTIONED, A SPEAKER REPRESENTED AS BOTH ESCROW, WHICH IS [INDISCERNIBLE] IS HERE TO SPEAK. I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT TONIGHT.

THEY WILL MAKE NOTE OF THAT TYPING HOWEVER AGAIN, STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL AS PRESENTED. AND THEN ALL ITEMS WITHIN THE ORDINANCE PROVIDED BY THE

APPLICANT TO >>COUNSELING, FOR APPLICATION TEST IS THE ORDINANCE OF ALL THOSE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS AND THE ACTUAL ORDINANCES IN YOUR PACKET?

CORRECT? >> >>THE CONNIVE ONE QUICK

QUESTION? >>PANSY IN THE CASE WHERE THOSE ADJUSTMENTS ARTIE PAID? THIS SESSIONS ALREADY MADE? WHEN THEY MADE THE DETERMINATION TO REFINE IT?

>>SO, PNC HEARD THE SAME PRESENTATION THAT YOU GET A HEARING TONIGHT.

AND SO, IN THE SAME PACKET. >>YES SIR, YOU'VE THE SAME PACKET.

>>I HAVE A QUESTION. WHY DID IT NOT GO BACK AND FORTH PNC?

>>THIS ONE MONTH BEFORE PNC. THIS ONE WENT BEFORE PNC. >>PNC WAS DENYING IT FOR UNIT.

>>DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO SPEAK AT THIS POINT WERE WE WANT

[INDISCERNIBLE] THE APPLICANT AND THE SUN >>GOOD EVENING MAYOR.

COUNCILMEMBERS? MY NAME IS MATT WALKER. WITH HOMEWOOD.

3000 TURTLE CREEK BOULEVARD IN DALLAS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME

[02:20:04]

YOU GUYS HAVE PUT IN LONG HOURS AND BASICALLY ATE YOUR WITH US ON THIS PROJECT.

I HAVE A SLIDESHOW PRESENTATION, BUT COLBY COVERED MOST OF MY POINTS.

AND SO ÃÃIF YOU WILL, I CAN GO THROUGH MAYBE SOME OF MY SLIDES TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION.

REALLY COLBY MADE A GOOD POINT. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT.

IF WE CAN CONSTRUCT THIS GIFT COWROTE. THOUSAND FEET WEST FROM 67.

AND WE BELIEVE PNC WOULD ALSO RECOMMEND THE PROJECT IF WE HAD AGREED TO TAKE ON THAT SCOPE.

MY ASKED YOU GUYS TO TODAY IS WHAT CAN WE JUDICIALLY AGREE ON HERE? WE WANT TO CONTINUE THE ESTIMATION OF MIDLOTHIAN PIT WE WANT TO CONTINUE TO BE A PARTNER WITH YOU GUYS. I GUESS IF I HAD TO CONCEDE HERE, CAN WE BE IN THE MIDDLE 500 PEOPLE THE PARTICULAR REQUIREMENT? THAT WOULD BE OUR ONLY ASK.

I'LL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. >>I THINK IT WAS IT WAS HELL WHAT ITSELF.

THAT WE HAD A DEBATE OVER BUILDING ÃÃTHAT SETTLED AT ABOUT 55 FEET AND THAT INCLUDED ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES. YES.

AND THIS TIME YOU ARE REQUESTING 80 FEET?

[INDISCERNIBLE] >>WOULD YOU PLEASE COME BACK TO THE PODIUM?

THERE ARE MORE QUESTIONS COMING IN. >>SO, IS THIS ONE ÃÃAND THIS IS TAILORED MORE TOWARDS MANUFACTURING. SO, COULD YOU EXPLAIN I GUESS ON SEVERAL TERMS ÃÃTHE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE WAREHOUSING USE AND

MANUFACTURING EASE AND THE NEED AN EXTRA HEIGHT? >>WE WOULD LOVE TO GO HIGHER IN THE HILLWOOD SOUTH. BUT, WE THINK THAT THE MARKET CALLS FOR 85 FOOT HEIGHT HERE.

AND WE ARE ASKING FOR THE TWO OTHER ASKS. WE KNOW HOW TO MARKET THIS SKILL AND IT CALLS FOR AN EXTRA 10 FEET. ADDITIONALLY, PREVIOUS DENIALS OF P AND Z BACK AND LAST NOVEMBER, WE WERE ASKING FOR ALL USES.

SO, WE BELIEVE WE HAVE COME DOWN SIGNIFICANTLY FROM THAT 110 FEET DOWN TO 85.

ALSO SUBJECT TO THE RESIDENTIAL PROXIMITY SLOPE. SO, THERE IS A TABLE AND THE ORDINANCE THAT OUTLINES WHAT THAT MEANS AND WHAT THAT ENTAILS FOR A CASE IN

RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. >>OKAY. WHAT WAS THE HEIGHT MAXIMUM Ã

THIS MAXIMUM HEIGHT FOR SELF. 55 FEET? >>I THINK YOU'RE RIGHT.

155 FEET. X YOU HAVE SLIDES SHOWING THE TRAFFIC FLOW IN AND OUT?

>>AND WHAT ARE THE INVESTMENTS YOU'RE GOING TO MAKE? >>

>>ONLY BRING TO THE SLIDES. WE ÃÃTHIS 170 ACRE DEVELOPMENT JUSTICE WE CANNOT HAVE THAT COMPETE WITH THE 350 ACRE DEVELOPMENT HILLWOOD SOUTH.

IF IT'S THE SAME HEIGHTS AND USES JUSTICE IN THOSE TWO DEVELOPMENT COMPETE WITH EACH OTHER. SO, WE'VE GOT HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF A DIFFERENT NOT NECESSARILY A TRACKING DIFFERENCE CUSTOMERS ÃÃWE NEED, BY RIGHT, TO HAVE A DIFFERENT TYPE OF FLEXIBLE THE WITH HILLWOOD NORTH. GENERALLY MAKE SENSE FOR US THAT WAY.

>>THE GO, COOL. SO HERE'S A SITE.ERE'S OUR SITE PLAN.

YOU GUYS SAW THAT. COUPLE OF UTILITY PLANTS THAT MIKE HAS SEEN THAT WE ARE JUST WORKING THROUGH WITH HIM. HERE IS THE 95 HUNDRED GIFT COULD ROAD.

THIS JUST SHOWS THE DISTANCE. THIS IS OFF THE MAIN FREEWAY. IT'S NOT VISIBLE FROM 67, USE OF THE HUNDRED AND 10 FOOT ONE GREEN RENDERING. THIS IS JUST MEANT TO SHOW ITS CLOSE TO TWO MILES OFF THE FREEWAY. AND TUCKED AWAY BEHIND THE ASH GROVE POINT. THIS IS EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE AT GIVE CODE RUN 267 BOTH SIDES OF THE FREEWAY ARE RELATED. AND THIS ADDRESSES SOME TOPICS THAT THEY COLBY TALKED ABOUT.

STARTED FROM THE DATA USE CENTER SVP. OBVIOUSLY OUR TIA NOW ADDRESSES MANUFACTURING USES AS WELL. PREVIOUSLY ONLY JUST WAREHOUSING USES.

SO STAFF WANTED TO SEE ZERO TIA REPRESENTING THE USES YOU'RE ASKING FOR? TIME OF DAY, NOW DOES. HERE, IF YOU WANT TO DIVE INTO THE ACTUAL TRIP COUNTS MAYOR,

[02:25:02]

NOW WE ARE MEASURING 9900 TRIPS A DAY. WHICH IS DOUBLE WHAT OUR HOUSING WAS. WE'RE SHOWING YOU THE EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE COULD TAKE THE MANUFACTURING JOBS THAT WE ARE REQUESTING.

ND THEN THIS TALKS ABOUT THE PERMANENT USES THAT ARE PROHIBITED WITH.

YOU GUYS ARE FAMILIAR WITH THE SOUTH HILLWOOD ORDINANCE. PERMITTED USES.

YOU GUYS SAW THIS. THIS IS JUST A QUICK SLIDE. IT REFERENCES THE MODULE.

WE WOULD LIKE TO THINK THAT OUR USE IS A LITTLE FRIENDLY. I KNOW IT WAS HERE, BUT WE ARE BUILDING JUST AS OUR BUILDINGS. YOU'VE SEEN THEM. IT'S A HIGH QUALITY PRODUCT.

SO ÃÃAND THEN, YOU GUYS ARE AWARE OF ANY FUTURE LAND USE PLAN.

OR THEIR PLANE? AND THEN THE RENDERINGS THAT COLBY HAD SHOWN YOU ALREADY.

>>COUNSEL, DO YOU HAVE QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? >>I HAVE SEVERAL.

A GUYS STILL PLANNING ON THE BRIDGE? >>WE ARE PLANNING ON THE BRIDGE. IT'S NOT IN THE ORDINANCE THOUGH.

>>OKAY. JUST, IS IT SUPPOSED TO BE? BECAUSE THAT'S NOT.HAT'S

NOT. >>IT'S JUST SOMETHING. WE THINK WE ARE GOING TO DO,

YES. >>OKAY, OKAY. SO, AT PN Z, MY INTERPRETATION OF THAT MEETING IS THAT IT WAS ALLOWED DOWN BY THE ROAD AND THEN IMPROVEMENTS TO GIVE CODE.

IT SEEMS LIKE EVERYBODY WAS ON THE SAME PAGE. AND SO HAS THAT CHANGED? OR ARE YOU TRYING? HE SAID, COMMIT A LITTLE AND YOU PROPOSING 500 FEET.

INSTEAD OF A THOUSAND. >>YOU HEARD THE SAME THING WE DID.

STAFF AND WE THOUGHT PNC BOTH WANTED US TO MAKE THE NECESSARY THOUSAND FOOT IMPROVEMENT.

I THINK WORKING WITH YOU AT PN Z, WE WERE VERY CLEAR. WE DON'T THINK THAT BENEFITED OUR PROJECT. WORKING WITH YOU TODAY IS SAYING HEY, WE WILL MEET IN THE MIDDLE AT 500 FEET. WE LOOK BACK AND WE STUDIED THE INTERSECTIONAL BIT MORE.

WE ARE WILLING TO MAKE THAT 500 FOOT APPROVAL. I THINK THAT'S A FAIR MEET IN

THE MIDDLE ÃTHIS WILL GO FROM THERE. >>Y'ALL ARE GOOD WITH

EVERYTHING EXCEPT FOR 500 FEET. >>I WOULD HATE TO ÃÃTHAT'S WHAT I WANT TO TALK TO ABOUT REAL QUICK. WE WENT FIRST AND LEFT ON THE ITEM C. IF THE THEM DISAGREE, WHETHER TO THOUSAND 500, I STRONGLY RECOMMEND THAT THE WE HONOR THE AGREEMENT THAT GOES

WITH IT. >>FOR THE 500 FEET?>BECAUSE THE ORDINATE ITSELF THAT CAN BE POSTED TO THE ORDINANCE.HAT WAS THE ISSUE WE HAVE LOST DEVELOPMENT.

THE ACTUALLY TABLE THAT BROUGHT THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ALONG FOR THE ZONING BACK AT THE SAME TIME. SO, JUST FROM MY LEGAL PERSPECTIVE, IF THE CITY'S INTERESTS, YOU CAN HAVE THE DEVELOPMENT IN PLACE AND REINFORCED.

>>USING BEFORE YOU PROVED ANYTHING? >>YES.

>>LAST TIME WE DID IT TOGETHER. >>SO, FOR ITSELF? >>YES.

>>WE ARE STILL WORKING JUSTICE. >>MULTI-DEVELOPMENT IS COMPLETE YET.

>>ÃÃ [INDISCERNIBLE] SO, THE SUN

>>NEED TO HAVE THE CONDITIONAL LANGUAGE. >>THE TERMS OF THE JUSTICE YES.

WHICH IS WHAT OUR GOAL IS TO DO. >>I GUESS FOR CHRIS MOORE AND OR JOE ÃÃSO, THE BRIDGE ÃÃ SINCE IT'S NOT LISTED HERE, THEY HAVE NO OBLIGATION IF THIS

PASSES TO DO ANYTHING TO THE BRIDGE, IS THAT CORRECT? >>CORRECT.

>>SO, THAT'S TO THEIR BENEFIT. NOT NECESSARILY HOURS TO HAVE THE BRIDGE?

>>I MEAN ÃÃ >>IT'S NOT LIKE WE ARE PLANNING IT?

>>MANY TRUCKS AS THEY SAID THEY'RE GONNA PUT IT DOWN. IT IS OUR BENEFIT BECAUSE OUR CITIZENS TAKE THE TEXAS TURNAROUND RIGHT THERE. ÃÃTHAT CAN BE AN ISSUE.

BUT YOU ASKED THE QUESTION AND THE WAY THAT YOU ANSWERED IT, I WANT TO TOUCH ON IT.

THE EXPANSION OF GIFT CO. ROAD AND APPROVING GIFT CORRODE HAVE NO BENEFIT TO STIFF WILLING SAY WHEN. STAFF IS REQUESTING US [INDISCERNIBLE] WE HAVE GONE BACK AND WE ARE AMENABLE TO 500 FEET THERE. OR A THOUSAND FEET.

>>IS 32 LANES. TWO LANES CONCRETE. >>FROM 67 THOUSAND FEET WEST TO

CONCRETE. >>THAT'S WHAT I'M ASKING. >>I THINK A RESURFACING OF THE EXISTING TWO LANES, I THINK FOR THOUSAND FEET, WE WOULD DO THAT.

>>WILL LOOKING FOR ADDITIONAL CAPACITY. >>AND THING ABOUT DOING THE

[02:30:01]

OR IS THAT MY WAY OUT OF THE PARK THERE? >>I GUESS THAT'S MY NEXT QUESTION. ON THE THOROUGHFARE, TYPICALLY, WE DO NOT ALLOW SECONDARY OR A PROJECT WITHOUT A SECONDARY WITHOUT ACCESS AFTER 1000 FEET. THE SOMETHING THAT ÃÃACCESS.

QUARRY ROAD? ALONG THE QUARRY AND THEN ONTO ÃÃJUST REAL QUICK, PART OF THE THOUGHT PROCESS AGAIN LOOKING AT THE THOUSAND FEET AND DOING ALL FOUR WAS THAT TWO OF THOSE LANES COULD BE ELIGIBLE FOR THE IMPACT FEE AND OFFSET THE CREDIT.

IT'S ON OUR IMPACT ÃÃTHAT'S ON THERE. I THOUGHT IT WAS.

IT WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR BUILDING TWO IN THE TWO COULD BE RECREDITED OR THE IMPACT FEE. THAT LAST RETURN MOVEMENTS TO GO SOUTHBOUND.

WORK TRUCKS GOING ACROSS OR GOING ACROSS THE BRIDGE IN THE ROOM TO BE ABLE TO GO ACROSS AND WE CAN GET AT SOME POINT OR FREE RECORD T CELL LINK OR SOUTHBOUND TO GOING TO GIVE CODE. GIVE THE BUILDING TO HAVE VEHICLES BE ABLE TO CONTINUE TO GO WESTBOUND ON GIVE CODE WITH THAT CAPACITY. AND BE ABLE TO HAVE ENOUGH ROOM TO BE ABLE TO LEAVE AND GET INTO THE TWO LANES AND CONTINUE ON TO THE WEST.

>>THE IMPACT OF TWO LANES AND THAT'S THE EXPANSION PER THEY WOULD RECOVER TWO LANES?

>>TWO OF THE ULTIMATE FORELIMBS THAT ARE BEING BUILT TO BE THROUGH ROADWAY IMPACT FEE.

YES. >>WHEN Y'ALL ARE SAYING 500 FEET, YOU ARE STILL TALKING ABOUT ONLY TWO LANES OR ARE YOU THINKING OF FOR LANES? BECAUSE IT'S VERY SIMPLE MATH.

1000 FEET OF TWO INCH VERSUS 500 FEET OR FOUR LANES. IT SHOULD BE THE SAME-ISH.

>>WELL, I THINK WE WERE TALKING ABOUT SHORTENING THAT SUMMIT SEGMENT FOR BOTH OF US TO 500

FEET. >>TWO LANES FOR Y'ALL. >>WE WOULD HAVE TO CONSTRUCT FOUR LANES AND THEN THROUGH IMPACT FEES, RECREDITED OR REIMBURSED.

FOR THE OUTSIDE TWO. >>IT IS STILL CUTTING THERE. CUTTING THE HORSE AND HAVE BEEN

CUTTING HOURS AND HALF. >>CORRECT. >>SO, WHERE DID THE THOUSAND

FEET COME FROM? >>1000 WAS KIND OF LOOKING AT WHAT WOULD BE KIND OF A TYPICAL ORDER IN ORDER TO HAVE ENOUGH ROOM. SO THAT YOU CAN HAVE MOVEMENTS AND WEAVING AT THE SAME TIME. AGAIN, NOT KNOWING WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN.

THIS IS GOING TO BE MOST OF THE VEHICLE TRAFFIC. IT'S CAN BE A LOT OF TRUCK TRAFFIC. BUT WHEN YOU LOOK AT TRUCKS, TYPICALLY 70Å0 FEET.

THIS CAN BE COMING OUT TO A CONTROLLED INTERSECTION WHERE THERE'S A TRAFFIC SIGNAL.

SO, YOU WILL HAVE VEHICLES STACKING AND THAT GIVES YOU ENOUGH ROOM TO MOVE BACK AND ALSO ALLOWING FOR VEHICLES TO HIT SOUTHBOUND. AND GO SOUTHBOUND 67 PER THERE IS ROOM FOR THEM TO BE ABLE TO HAVE THE LANE AND BE ABLE TO HIT SOUTHBOUND AS WELL AND NOT BE STUCK AT THE INTERSECTION. BEHIND VEHICLES THAT ARE QUEUING TO BE ABLE TO GO ACROSS

THE BRIDGE AND HEADED NORTH. >>WE HAVE SEVEN TRUCKS. SO

[INDISCERNIBLE] 14 OR 15 OR PLUS ÃÃTHE SUN >>I SOMETHING ÃÃMENTIONED THE BRIDGE ACROSS 67. YOU GET TO LANES THERE. GET THE TRAFFIC FOR THOSE TWO

LANES. >>WHAT YOU WOULD DO AND THAT IS THAT YOU HAD INTO YOUR INSIDE LANES AND YOU HAD TO THE INSIDE LANES. IF YOU HAVE FROM GECKO YOUR LANE WITH ONE OF THE BRIDGE. YOU CAN HEAD SOUTHBOUND TO GO TO 67.

THE TWO LANES THAT ARE IN THERE IN THE MIDDLE AND THE PART OF IT.

INSTEAD OF BEING OFFSET. ÃÃGOING UP OR DOWN THAT ROAD. >>THERE IS CLOSER TO 10.

IT'S GONNA BE TO THE WAREHOUSE AND CLOSER TO 4400 VEHICLES A DAY FOR BASED ON THE TRAFFIC IMPACT, IF YOU LOOK AT MANUFACTURING TYPE USE ÃÃ [INDISCERNIBLE] SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 44 AND 40 510,000 VEHICLES ÃÃFROM THIS PARTICULAR USE, IT POTENTIALLY

COULD HAVE ON THAT READ EACH DAY. >>AND THAT ROAD COULD HAVE ÃÃ

[02:35:05]

[INDISCERNIBLE] >>THAT'S WHAT WE'RE WORKING TOWARDS.

WE ARE WORKING FROM THE ROAD ITSELF. IF YOU GET PAST ÃÃWITH 500 FEET OR 1000 FEET, WHEN YOU GET PAST THAT, RIGHT NOW, TO BE UTILIZED BY ASH GROVE AND THE TRUCKS THERE. SOME WORK IS GOING TO BE DONE ON THAT.

BUT FROM THE STANDPOINT OF THE EXISTING BASE MATERIAL, YOU CANNOT IMPACT A MORE THAN 30 BEING COMPACTED OVER THE YEARS. YOU COME OVER AND DO SOME KIND OF OVERLAY.

WE HAVE A HOT MIX OVERLAY OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. MOSTLY HEADING STRAIGHT ON NORTH ÃÃTHE TRUCK TRIPS A WHOLE LOT BETTER IF YOU ARE TURNING.

YOU START GETTING CLOSER FROM WHERE ASH GROVE IS CONNECTING TO THOSE FRONT ENTRANCES.

THIS CONCRETE, AND IS PROBABLY JUST AS FOR 10TH OF A MILE. IN THE SUN STARTING BACK DOWN THERE WITH HANSEN. AND THEN HEADING BACK TOWARDS THE EAST.

THAT'S WHAT MOST OF THE TRUCKS ARE MAKING TURNS FOR NOW. >>

[INDISCERNIBLE] >>ULTIMATELY WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO TRYING TO SOME KIND OF OVERLAY ON AND IT'S GONNA BE APPROVED AT SOME POINT IN THE FUTURE AS WELL.

>>USING FUNDS FOR HALF OF THE 500 FEET INSTEAD OF THE THOUSAND?

>>STAFF STILL HAS THE THOUSAND FEET. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THAT WE BUMP IT DOWN TO 500 FEET FROM THE MIDDLE. AT THAT STANDPOINT, IT WOULD BE WHETHER COUNSEL PROVES THE 500 OR 1000 FEET, WE CAN DO ALL FOUR LANES.

IT WOULD BE ELIGIBLE FOR TWO OF THOSE LANES. WHATEVER DISTANCE WOULD BE ELIGIBLE FOR IMPACT FEE OR OFFSET CREDIT FROM THE ROADWAY SIDE.

>>YES SIR. >>1000 FEET. >>WE WOULD HAVE TO DO

DEVELOPMENT FOR SURE ON THAT TO GET THAT COVERED. >>JUST A REMINDER, BECAUSE IT'S IT IT'S IN THE ORDINANCE, WE DO NOT HAVE THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IN PLACE.

>>WE ARE JUST GOING TO MAKE SURE JOE HAS THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

>>ABSOLUTELY. >>I GUESS THAT'S MY TEST TEST ONE OF MY BIG ISSUES.

THE FACT THAT WE ARE STILL NEGOTIATING THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ON THE FIRST ONE AND I DON'T REALLY FEEL COMFORTABLE. ESPECIALLY WITH MY ATTORNEY

SAYING THAT I NEED ONE. >>IT STILL NEEDS TO BE APPROVED THOUGH.

IT JUST GOT FINISHED LAST WEEK. >>I AGREE. >>WHEN THE ATTORNEYS HAS BEEN NEED ONE, WE NEED ONE. THE BIGGEST ONE THAT I'M NOT WILLING TO SACRIFICE, IF IT DOESN'T WORK ÃÃIT JUST DOESN'T WORK AND I UNDERSTAND THAT.

IS THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING. THE BUILDING IS A BEAUTIFUL PLACE.

RESIDENTS LOVE THIS APARTMENT. I LOVE THIS APARTMENT. IF Y'ALL CAN MAKE IT WORK AT 55 FEET LIKE THE FIRST ONE, GREAT. IF NOT, THEN I UNDERSTAND. I'M NOT GOING TO GO UP ON A

BUILDING HEIGHT PAST 55 FEET. >>I AGREE WITH MR. WOODRUFF'S SEDIMENT.

>>I DO TOO. BUT WHEN ASKED QUESTIONS ÃÃ THERE ARE THREE BUILDINGS, RIGHT? YOU HAVE THE DATA CENTER. WILL THE DATA CENTER TAKE UP

THE WHOLE BUILDING OR NOT? >>IT JUST ALL DEPENDS IF THE DATA CENTER ÃÃIF THE MARKET TELLS US THE DATA CENTERS GOING TO BE 1 MILLION FEET. IT WILL TAKE ONE OF THOSE BIG

BUILDINGS. >>IF YOU BUILD, YOU CAN BUILD THE WHOLE BUILDING, RIGHT?

>>IT ALL DEPENDS ÃÃWE'RE TALKING ABOUT MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT.

IT COULD VARY. >>WELL. >>I'M ASSUMING YOUR BUILDINGS

WILL BE FLOODED AT THE TOP OF THE FLAT. >>OFTEN TIME, ARTICULATION

REQUIREMENTS ARE [INDISCERNIBLE] >>OKAY.

>>WE HAVE A SPEAKER. FRANCISCO PINTO? >>I'LL BE BRIEF.AN I BORROW

[INDISCERNIBLE] >>SO, YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS.

>>YES. FRANCISCO PINTO PUT I WORK FOR ASHEVILLE 'S MENTO COMPANY.

IS THAT GOOD? OKAY. >>OKAY, THERE IS A GREAT SITE IN THEIR SHOWS IT THE OTHER WAY. THAT ONE?

>>OKAY, KEEP GOING KEEP GOING KEEP GOING. I SAW GREAT LIGHT IN A THAT SHOWS THE LAYOUT OF THE ACTUAL PROPERTY. JUST FOR REFERENCE, IF I CAN FIND IT ÃÃAS Y'ALL KNOW, WE HAVE BEEN THERE. CASTRO WENT UP HE THAT SIZE.

166) ERIC COREY HAS EXPENDED ALL THE WAY TO 67. THE REASON WHY WE SUPPORT THIS PROJECT IS BECAUSE WE BELIEVE THAT SOMETHING LIKE IS GOING TO GRADUALLY GIVE US A TRANSITION TO WHAT'S BEEN HAPPENING. IN THE TIME SINCE I'VE BEEN THERE SINCE 1999, WE HAVE GROWN FROM LESS THAN 10,000 RESIDENTS TO WHAT? 38,000 OR SO?

[02:40:02]

WE ARE NOT GONNA GO AS FAR NORTH BECAUSE WE GET TO SARAH HILL.

WANT A BUFFER AND ONCE IN TRANSITION THERE. THE TRANSITION CAN BE LIKE LOWER AND INDUSTRIAL AND LESS THAN A HEAVY 1000 HORSEPOWER MOTOR LIKE WE HAVE.

TO THE NORTH. SOMEWHERE IN THERE. WATER LINES.

A COUPLE PLACES FOR THE WATERLINE. TO THE EAST, JUST AS WE HAVE RESERVED. ALL THE WAY TO THE TOSCA. WE GAVE THAT UP.

THAT IS THE BUFFER. TO THE WEST, WE HAVE LEASED THIS TO HANSEN FOR TRANSLUCENT MATERIAL FROM THE RAIL. SO, THAT IS AN OFFER. WE ILLNESS, WE LEASE IT OUT FOR AGRICULTURAL USE. SO, FOR US, OUR MAIN CONCERN IS MAKING SURE THAT WE DON'T HAVE AS MUCH RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT RIGHT HERE. OR RIGHT HERE.

WE KNOW THAT THIS IS HAPPENING. WE KNOW THIS IS GOING TO HAPPEN AT SOME POINT.

WE ARE HOPEFUL THAT WE HAVE SOME COMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENT THAT JUST GRADUALLY GOES LIKE I SAID FROM 1000 HORSEPOWER MOTOR THAT HAS A LOT OF NOISE AND IS CIRCULATED FOR ITS NOTICE FOR ONE THAT HAS EITHER WAREHOUSING OR SOME KIND OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL OR HEAVY INDUSTRIAL.

BUT LESS THAN WHAT WE ARE DOING. BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE IN ALMOST EVERY DIRECTION. WE LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH WHOEVER IT IS OR THE CITY IN THE FUTURE AS WELL. WE HAVE BEEN HERE SINCE THE 1960S AND WE HOPE TO BE THERE FOR SEVERAL MORE DECADES. EVEN IF I'M NOT. SO, THAT IS ALL I HAVE TO SAY

ABOUT THAT. THANK YOU. >>I HAVE A QUESTION.

>>ANY IDEA HOW TALL YOUR BUILDINGS ARE OR YOUR HIGHS BUILDING UP THERE?

>>OUR TALLEST TOWER, WHICH IS THE ONE THAT YOU SEE. THE AMERICAN FLAG AND 450 FEET

AND THE STACK ITSELF IS 300. >>OKAY. >>THINK.

>>THANK YOU. >>MAYOR, I WAS JUST CAN SAY ONE THING.

FOR THOSE CONCERNED ABOUT HEIGHT, THE RENDERINGS WE ARE SHOWING OUR 110 FEET TALL.

THEY ARE GRAHAM GREEN BOXES UP THERE. THEY WORK.

SO, ALL OF THEIR USES ARE SUBJECT TO 185 FEET. WITH RESIDENTIAL PROXIMITY SLOPE. SO, WE HAVE KNOCKED OFF QUITE A BIT FROM 110 FEET WHICH WE ARE

SHOWING FROM OUR RECORDS. JUST SOMETHING TO KEEP IN MIND. >>AND YOU ARE SAYING TO 110 FEET WOULD ONLY BE FOR THE COLD STORAGE AND THE DATA CENTER AND THAT WOULD BE A MAXIMUM OF ONE BUILDING? IS THERE A CHANGE TO ALL THREE BUILDINGS COULD BE 110 FEET?

>>I WOULD SAY THAT'S HIGHLY UNLIKELY. IT WOULD PROBABLY BE

[INDISCERNIBLE] >>THE ORDINANCE IS WRITTEN TO WERE ALL THREE COULD BE.

>>I PERSONALLY AM NOT AS CONCERNED ABOUT THE HUNDRED AND 10 FEET.

I AGREE WITH YOU ON LIKE THE LANDSCAPE. BUT WHEN I LOOK AT ESCROW AND I LOOK OVER THERE AND SEE 200Ö00 FOOT SMOKESTACKS, I'M NOT LIKE THAT 310 FOOT BUILDING IS NOT CORRECT THAT VIEW. IN OTHER AREAS, I WOULD BE MORE CONCERNED ABOUT THAT.

IN THIS AREA, I WOULD BE MORE ABOUT HAVING A BUFFER. TO TREAT RESIDENTIAL AND

OTHERS. >>I FULLY AGREE WITH THE BUFFER.

100 PERCENT. >>YOU JUST WANT A SHORTER BUFFER.

>>I WANT A SHORTER BUFFER. ESCROW AND ALL THE CEMENT FENCE THAT'S THERE ARE GREAT BENEFIT TO MIDLOTHIAN AND I GET THAT. THIS IS NOT TO DOG THEM, BUT JUST BECAUSE WE PUT 300 FOOT

STACKS THERE ONCE DOESN'T MEAN WE SHOULD KEEP REPEATING IT. >>IN THE POINT OF THE 110 BUILDING ÃTHIS HUNDRED AND 10 FOOT BUILDING ÃJUST REMEMBER HEARING SOMETHING ABOUT POTENTIAL TENANTS GOING TO DO NOT COME HERE BECAUSE OF THE OPTIONS.

EVEN THOUGH YOUR CAMPUS HAD ÃÃ WHAT WAS THE DEAL WITH THAT? >>I THINK WITH THAT TOPIC WAS CONSIDERED ÃÃIT WAS ÃÃIT MAY HAVE BEEN HEIGHT. BUT A LOT OF IT WAS USED.

WE HAVE TENANTS THAT COME TO US AND THEY WANT TO BE ÃÃTHEY WANT THEIR VIEWS TO BE PERMANENT BY RIGHT. THEY DON'T WANT AN SEP AND THEY DON'T WANT TO? THE COUNCIL. THEY DO NOT WANT A PUBLIC HEARING LIKE THIS.

THEY WANT TO BE ABLE TO HAVE CERTAIN PEOPLE THAT CAN COME TO THE CITY AND OPERATE.

AND SO, IT'S LIKELY A USED CONVERSATION THAT WAS DISCUSSED.

BUT IT COULD'VE BEEN HEIGHT TWO. IT CAN BE A VARIANCE FOR HEIGHT

IF THE HEIGHT WERE TO BE KNOCKED DOWN. >>AND THAT REMINDS ME OF MY LAST QUESTION AND THAT I WILL BE DONE, I PROMISE. THAT IS WHAT I DON'T UNDERSTAND. IF ONE OF THE TWO USES FOR THE I IS A DATA CENTER AND THIS MIGHT BE FIRST DRAFT, WHY ARE WE REQUIRING SEP FOR A DATA CENTER? WHY WOULD WE ALLOW THEM TO GO ALL THE WAY TO 110 AND THEN ONE OF THE TWO USES FOR THE HEIGHT

[02:45:10]

REQUIRED? >>THE WATER CONSUMPTION. WE ARE CONCERNED WITH ÃÃWHEN THESE GUYS COME IN, THEY CONSUME A LOT OF WATER. AND WE WANT THE ABILITY TO PLAN FOR THAT. FOR THAT TO GO TO PLANNING OR TO THE CITY COUNCIL SAY HEY, WE ARE ABOUT THAT TWO OR 3 MILLION GALLONS A DAY IN THE ALLOTMENT. ARE Y'ALL READY TO TAKE A JUMP OFF IN THAT BOAT? THEY ARE GREAT USES, BUT AT THE SAME TIME, THEY ARE VERY INTENSE USES FROM A WATER STANDPOINT. IN A LOT OF WAYS, THAT WATER

STANDPOINT. AS FAR AS WE'RE CONCERNED. >>WITH MORE QUESTIONS COUNCIL?

>>HIM BACK TO THE BRIDGE AGAIN. [INDISCERNIBLE] THE COMPLETION OF THE RAILROAD TRACK. IS THAT A MAYBE OR COULD BE OR

IT'S GONNA BE. >>IT'S HIGHLY UNLIKELY, BUT IT'S NOT THE ORDINANCE.

MIDLOTHIAN IN THE CITY WOULD REALLY LOVE THEY DON'T WANT TO BRIDGE, I DON'T KNOW.

I DON'T THINK WE WOULD BE COMMITTED TO BUILDING A BRIDGE FOR NO REASON.

IF THEY ARE OKAY ACROSS THE RAILROAD TRACK AND BUILDING A BRIDGE, THAT WOULD BE THE CHOICE. THEY ARE DOING OTHER PLACES. REAL PORT.

OUR HILLWOOD SOUTH OFF OF FORT WORTH ROAD OFF OF SOUTH 67 JUST AS THEY ARE CROSSING THE RAILROAD TRACK WITHOUT A BRIDGE. AND IT'S BEEN A SUCCESSFUL PROJECT. AND ITS LEASING ACTIVITY IS GREATER.

SO WE OF COURSE THINK IT'S A COMPETITIVE EDGE TO THE BUILDING BRIDGE.

BUT IF TENANTS DO NOT WANT ONE, THEN I MEAN, WE WILL NOT BUILD ONE IF THEY DON'T WANT OR NEED

ONE. >>THERE ARE SERIOUS BACKUPS IN THE AREA BY THE WAY.

SOUTH.FOR THE SUN >>BELLPORT? >>LIKE SERIOUS BACKUP.

>>I WILL SAY ÃÃI WOULD SAY THAT THERE IS BETTER SECONDARY ACCESS AT REAL PORT THEN THERE

WILL BE OFF OF CORY ROAD. IF THERE IS. >>BELLPORT DID NOT EVEN USED TO HAVE THAT. THEY DID NOT PUT THAT IN UNTIL 2014.

AND I KNOW IT WAS A NIGHTMARE BEFORE THEY DID THAT TOO.

RE WE STILL ON THE PUBLIC HEARING? >>YES WE ARE.

>>WE SHOULD BE ASKING FOR QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS. >>I MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE

PUBLIC HEARING. >>SECOND. >>WE WOULD LIKE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU SECOND, PLEASE JUSTICE THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSE.

OUNSEL? COMMENTS? >>I THINK THE LOCATION IS GOOD.

I THINK IT'S A GOOD THING. I HEAR THE GENTLEMAN FROM ASH GROVE SAYS IT WOULD CREATE THE PROPER [INDISCERNIBLE] I AGREE WITH MOST OF THE SENTIMENTS ABOUT THE BUILDING HEIGHT. ALTHOUGH IT MIGHT BE A LITTLE MORE FLEXIBLE PERSONALLY. THE TRAFFIC AND THE ROAD TO ME IS THAT DEALBREAKER.

WITH THAT MUCH IMPACT ON THE ROAD ÃÃI FEEL LIKE WE NEED TO HAVE A BETTER SOLUTION FOR THAT. THAT'S WHERE I AM ON PERSONALLY.

>>I'M HUNG UP ON THE BILLING. LIKE I SAID, IF OUR ATTORNEY SAYS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, THAT I'M STICKING WITH HIM ON THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. WHEN WE TALK ABOUT THE ROAD.

[INDISCERNIBLE] GOOD? IS EVERYBODY DONE WITH THEIR

COMMENTS? >>I WANT TO MAKE A MOTION JUSTICE ARE WE

[INDISCERNIBLE] MOTION? >>I WANT TO MAKE A MOTION TO

DENY. >>SECOND. >>WE HAVE A MOTION TO VOTE TO DENY. MOTION PASSES 5Ä. THANK YOU.

[2022-451]

[02:50:07]

USES. COLBY? >>THANK YOU MAYOR.

>>WE DO HAVE A SPEAKER ON THE SIDE THERE. >>SORRY.

THINK AMERICAN. OUR ORDINANCE LAST ITEM FOR PLANNING AGENDA ITEM 2022SS51.

FOR CASE NUMBER Z 39Ö022 155. AGAIN, THIS IS FOR THE PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE FROM 151 AGRICULTURAL TO THE YOU BPD TO ALLOW FOR RESIDENTIAL AND POSSIBLY CHURCH USE SETTING SITE.S YOU SEE ON THIS FIRST SLIDE HERE, AGAIN, THIS IS LOCATED AT ADF M6 63.

JUST UNDER 14 ACRES AT 13.974 ACRES. THE APPLICANT IS ASKING TO REZONE THE PROPERTY, WHICH IS FROM ONE AN AGRICULTURAL TO A YOU BPD.

HIS NEXT SLIDE SHOWS THE OVERALL CONCEPT PLANT SPLIT UP INTO TWO LOTS.

ONE BEING IN THE FRONT, A LOT TO BEING IN THE REAR. AND AN APPLICANT AGAIN, IS POSSIBLY USING A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND POSSIBLY A CHURCH USE AT THE SITE.

THIS NEXT SLIDE IS A COMPARISON TO OUR SINGLE-FAMILY ONE STANDARD.

FAR LEFT-HAND SIDE IS OUR STANDARDS. SECOND COLUMN HERE IS WITH THE CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN REQUIREMENTS ARE FOR SINGLE-FAMILY ONE. WITH THE APPLICANT PROPOSING FOR LOT 1. WHICH COULD EITHER BE IN A CHURCH OR SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE LOT TWO, WHICH IS LIMITED TO A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE.ND IN THE FAR RIGHT-HAND CORNER, AND THE MEATS CALM, MEETING WITH THE STANDARDS OR NOT. THE APPLICANT, AS YOU SEE IS MEETING ALL THE REQUIREMENTS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE LOT WITH FOUR LOT TO BE 40 FEET WIDE AND WE WILL TOUCH BACK HERE IN A SECOND. THEN LOT 1, THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED AND THIS IS 45 FEET. AND IF IT IS A SIGNAL FAMILY RESIDENCE, THE APPLICANT IS INTENDED TO MEET THAT 45 FEET REQUIREMENT. THE CHURCH APPLICANT IS ASKING FOR A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 35 FEET. THESE NEXT FEW SLIDES WILL BREAKDOWN THE LOTS SEPARATELY. THE LOT OUTLINED IN RED IN THE FRONT CALLS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE. THERE IS AN EXISTING HOME IN THE PROPERTY, SO THEY WILL ULTIMATELY GO AWAY AND THEN BE CONSTRUCTED ON LOT TWO. WHICH IS THIS PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. THIS IS NOT ACRES. ROUGHLY 14 ACRES OF THE SITE.

IT IS LIMITED TO ONE RESIDENTIAL LOT. IT DOES CHOOSE TO HAVE A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE FOR THE LOT. IF IT IS A CHURCH ÃÃIT WOULD BE OF MAXIMUM ALLOWANCE OF 55 FEET. WE ARE ASKING THAT THE CHURCH BE REVIEWED BY THE PNC COUNSEL TO REVIEW COMPLIANCE. WITH THE PEE DEE.

THE APPLICANT IS INTENDING TO MEET ALL STANDARDS OF THIS ZONE ONE DISTRICT AS WE WENT THROUGH THE COMPARISON CHART. LOT TWO, WHICH IS OUTLINED IN ORANGE HERE, THERE IS A PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND THIS IS ONLY LIMITED TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE FOR THIS SITE. THIS IS NOT FIVE ACRES OF 1.5 ACRES AND [INDISCERNIBLE] 40 FEET. AS YOU SEE RIGHT HERE, THIS IS THE VARIANCE REQUEST THAT THE APPLICANT IS ASKING FOR WITHIN THE PEE DEE IF YOU WILL.

THIS WILL HELP THE APPLICANT TO GET TO IN THE SITE AND GET A LOT TO END THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY. THIS NEXT SLIDE, THE NEXT SLIDE IS FOR THE ELEVATION OF SIDE AND THE APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL. HERE IS A RENDERING CONSISTING OF ROUGHLY WOOD AND HARDY BOARD, SIDING, BRICK MATERIALS, SO, THIS IS INSPIRATIONAL PHOTO IF YOU WILL.

IT WILL NOT BE EXACTLY LIKE THIS, HOWEVER, IF THE APPLICANT APPROVES, HE IS EXPECTED TO DO SOMETHING OF THIS NATURE FOR LOT TWO. AGAIN, GOING BACK TO LOT TWO ACCESS, PROPOSED YOU PUT THE WITH THIS IS BETTER WAY TO GET IN FRONT OF THE PROPERTY.

LOT 2 IN THE PROPERTY. AND THIS IS THE APPLICANT WORKING WITH TEXT.AS WELL.

THEY WILL ALLOW LOT TO TO DRIVE TO THE FUTURE HOME AND THE DRIVEWAY WILL BE RIGHT IN AND WRITE OUT FOR RESIDENTIAL USE ONLY ON THE PROPERTY. WE DO WANT TO NOTE STAFFING THIS SUPPORT 12 LETTERS OF OPPOSITION. LEGAL NOTICES FOR THIS.

WE REFERENCED NONRESIDENTIAL USES, WHICH WE DID NOT NOTE THE TIME WAS GOING TO BE LIMITED TO A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE OR A CHURCH. WENT NONRESIDENTIAL AND THOSE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS GET THOSE LETTERS, THEY WERE UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT WE DON'T WANT A GAS STATION, WE DON'T WANT ANY KIND OF AN RESIDENTIAL USE AROUND US.

OR SOME OF THE ÃJUST FOR THE NEIGHBORS THAT CALLED IN ÃÃ HOWEVER, WE DID RECEIVE 12 LETTERS OF OPPOSITION FOR THAT. AT THE PLANT ZONING MEETING, PNC SAID IT WAS TO PROVE THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST AND AGAIN, STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL PRESENTED BY OUR STAFF.

>>I HAVE A QUESTION. >>YES SIR. >>HOW WIDE IS THE DRIVEWAY?

>>SO, THIS CAN BE 40 FEET. FOR LOT TWO. >>NO, THE DRIVEWAY.

[02:55:05]

OF THE LOT. >>FOR THE LOT HERE? >>STILL GET TO THE LOT.

YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THE CONCRETE PORTION? >>THE WIDTH OF IT.

>>THE ESTES THINK THE WIDTH OF THE PROPERTY IS 40 FOOT, BUT THE DRIVEWAY IS PROBABLY A

STANDARD 12 FOOTER SUMMER. >>IN THE SUN >>I WAS JUST LOOKING AT THE LOT. THE LOT IS ONLY 40 FEET WIDE. IS THAT CORRECT?

>>YES SIR. THE APPLICANT ÃÃTHE ONE I HAD TO GET IS WORKING WITH TEXT.AND THEY ARE ON THE SAME PAGE AGAIN. THE APPLICANT CAN SPEAK A LITTLE BIT MORE TO WHERE THE PROGRESS IS AT THIS POINT. BUT LAST MONTH'S STAT SPOKE WITH TEXT. . THEY WERE IN CAHOOTS WITH THIS

APPLICANT TO GET IT TO WRITE IN AND WRITE OUT ACCESS. >>STAFF RECOMMENDED APPROVAL.

I THOUGHT WHEN PEOPLE WERE ASKING FOR VARIANCES, THEY DON'T RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

>>NO, WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL. IF WE FEEL THAT IT DOES NOT AFFECT THE PROPERTY OR

SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. >> [INDISCERNIBLE]

>>MAYOR, WE HAVE A SPEAKER BEFORE WE GET TOO DEEP INTO QUESTIONS?

>>THE INITIAL QUESTIONS TO COLBY, BUT WE HAVE A SPEAKER. LISA HEALY.

NAME AND ADDRESS PLEASE? >>HI LISA HEALY 418 MULLIGAN DRIVE.

I LIVE IN THE DEVELOPMENT BEHIND THIS PROPERTY. AT THE PNC MEETING, JUST QUICKLY, THERE WAS ONLY 11 LETTERS. AT THAT MEETING.

AND THEY WERE ALL AGAINST. AND I'M NOT QUITE SURE OF THE PRESENTATION TONIGHT ABOUT IT BEING THE HIGH-TRAFFIC. IT WAS THE ONLY CONCERN. FOR ME ÃJUST MY STATEMENT ÃÃ TONIGHT IS WHAT WE'VE BEEN GOING THROUGH THE WHOLE BUDGET PROCESS AND SETTING THE TAX RATE ÃÃGROWTH PAYS FOR GROWTH. THAT CAN ONLY WORK IF WE HAVE A GOOD PLAN FOR THE GROWTH. AND RIGHT NOW ÃÃIT'S FEELING LIKE WE ARE JUST APPROVING STUFF AND WE ARE GROWING AND IT'S A LITTLE BIT OUT OF CONTROL.

AND YOU CAN SEE THAT WITH THE THINGS THAT ARE OVERBUDGET ON. JUST THE CITY HALL AND THE PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING. THAT WE SPOKE ABOUT AT THE WORKSHOP TONIGHT.

MY CONCERN IS NOT NECESSARILY HAVING A CHURCH OR A RESIDENTIAL HOME THERE.

MY CONCERN IS CONVERTING AN AGRICULTURAL SINGLE-FAMILY. REZONING IT TO AN URBAN VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. URBAN VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS ARE GREAT WHEN THEY ARE NEAR DOWNTOWN. THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO HAVE INFRASTRUCTURE SO THAT THINGS CAN BE ACCESSED EASILY. WALKING, MY CONCERN IS BECAUSE IT'S STILL UP IN THE AIR ÃÃ THIS CHURCH SINGLE-FAMILY LOT IS GOING TO BE SOLD TO A DEVELOPER, THAT WAS ALSO WHAT WAS PRESENTED AT PNC. IT'S NOT GOING TO BE OWNED BY THIS APPLICANT.

I'M CONCERNED THAT IT WILL BE SOLD AND NOW IT HAS THIS DESIGNATION.

AND WHAT IF THEY DON'T WANT TO DO A SINGLE-FAMILY? THEY DON'T WANT TO DO A CHURCH? THEY WILL GO BACK AND GET IT REZONED.ND I REALLY DON'T FEEL LIKE WE WANT TO BRING DOWNTOWN MIDLOTHIAN ALL THE WAY OUT TO 663. CLOSE TO 875.

SO, I WOULD HOPE THAT YOU WOULD CONSIDER DENYING IT AND ASKING THEM TO GO BACK AND JUST DO A SINGLE-FAMILY. SO THAT WE DON'T HAVE TO REZONED TO THE URBAN VILLAGE

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. THANK YOU. >>ACTUALLY HAD A QUESTION FOR

YOU. >>YOU SAID YOU HAVE THE CHANGE IN AGRICULTURE TO USE VPD.

BUT, IF IT WAS ANY OTHER CHANGE ÃÃYOU SAYING THAT YOU WOULD BE OKAY WITH THAT OR BECAUSE

IT'S TAKING AWAY FROM THE AGRICULTURAL ZONING? >>IF IT'S ÃÃI UNDERSTAND THAT YOU MIGHT NOT BE ABLE TO BE AN AGRICULTURAL SINGLE-FAMILY BECAUSE OF THE LOT SIZES ÃÃI

[03:00:06]

ANYWAY, IT'S MOSTLY ÃÃI WOULD LIKE IT TO BE SINGLE-FAMILY. AND I'M NOT NECESSARILY CONCERNED ABOUT THE AGRICULTURAL PART OF IT, BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW IF IT WILL MEET THE CRITERIA BECAUSE OF THE LOT SIZES. IT'S MOSTLY ABOUT THAT URBAN VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT THAT I HAVE A CONCERN. AND THAT IT COULD LEAVE.

BE BECAUSE THOSE LEAD TO HIGH DENSITY. IT'S PROVEN IN OTHER CITIES AND IT'S JUST HOW THEY ARE. I'M RESEARCHING AND I CAN PROVIDE ARTICLES ABOUT URBAN VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS. BUT THEY REALLY DO TEND TO MAKE A CITY GROW.

MUCH FASTER.AND THE DENSITY MUCH HIGHER. >>THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING THAT

FOR ME. >>THINK. >>QUESTION FOR STAFF?

>>THANK YOU MR. HEALY. WIDE WITCHES ÃÃ [INDISCERNIBLE] YES. WHY DID WE CHOOSE TO GO WITH IT YOU VPD VERSUS THE PEE DEE?

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE? >>ABSORPTIVE >>WANTED TO GO WITH YOU VPD VERSUS PD? BECAUSE IF WE'RE SPEAKING ABOUT DENSITY, I CAN SEE THAT THE

NEIGHBORHOOD ÃÃ [INDISCERNIBLE] >>THE NEIGHBORHOOD JUST TO THE

NORTH IS THE HIGH DENSITY. >>YES, I THINK WHAT IT IS IS THAT THE FLEXIBILITY OF THAT USE.HE FUTURE USE TO ALLOW CHURCH AND OR SINGLE-FAMILY HOME.

NOW, FROM SUPREME COURT OR ANYTHING, THE CHURCH CAN GO ON ANY ZONING DISTRICT.

IT WASN'T THAT MUCH OF A NECESSITY. AM I CORRECT IN THAT JOE?

>>YES, YOU ARE CORRECT. SO, THAT WAS MAYBE THE ONLY REASON.

IT'S NOT TO BUILD DENSITY IN THERE WHATSOEVER. THE URBAN VILLAGE PD ÃÃIF WE ARE LOOKING AT OTHER CITIES AND THINGS LIKE THAT, THAT MIGHT COME WITH DENSITY.URS IS A CERTAIN CONTENT. MUCH AS PEOPLE FLEXIBLE TO CHURCH USE AND SINGLE-FAMILY.

AS FAR AS I'M SURE. >>THE CHURCH CAN GO ON ANY ZONING.

REALLY THE QUESTION COMES DOWN TO THE APPLICANT. CAN THIS APPLICANT SPLIT THEIR PIECE OF PROPERTY INTO TWO LOTS REALLY? THAT'S IN THE QUESTION, RIGHT?

>>THAT THE LOT WITH. THAT'S ANOTHER THING. YOU CAN DO THAT ON THE PEE DEE

AS WELL PAY THE REGULAR PD. >>I HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT WITH.

THAT IS THE MINIMUM WIDTH. AS THE MINIMUM WIDTH ONLY IF YOU CONSIDER THAT SLIVER THAT'S

DEDICATED FOR DRIVEWAY, CORRECT? >>CORRECT.

>>WHAT IS THE DIMENSION OF THE BACK PART OF THAT LOT? >>I COULD TELL YOU THE ACREAGE.

THE ACREAGE PORT. >>WHAT IS THE FEET? >>IF YOU TAKE AWAY THE

DRIVEWAY, WHAT IS THE DIMENSION OF THAT? >>4.985 EIGHT.

>>I CANNOT READ IT. >>20 FEET TALL AND HOW MANY FEET LONG AND WIDE?

>>WHAT IS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SAY THE MINIMUM WIDTH IS 40 FEET? IS THAT GOING TO COME BACK LATER NOW THAT YOU HAVE CLEARED THE WITH LOT 40 FEET WIDE?

IT'S ONLY 40 FEET WIDE. >>BECAUSE OF THE DRIVE. >>YES SIR.

>>WHEN THE COME BACK LATER Ã THIS COULD THEY HAVE 40 FEET WIDE LOTS?

>>SO, THAT YOU VPD WOULD ALLOW STRICTLY FOR THE DRIVE ACCESS ONLY.

THAT IS THE ONLY REASON FOR THE 40 FOOT LOT WITH. THE LOT REQUIREMENT IS 150 I BELIEVE. BUT THIS ONE IS STRICTLY ONLY IN REFERENCE TO AN AXIS OF LOT TWO COMPONENTS IN THE PROPERTY. SO, DOES NOT NECESSARILY NEED AND MEAN THAT THE HOMES CAN BE 40 FEET WIDE. WE ARE POINTING OUT THAT THIS IS STRICTLY FOR THE DRIVE TO

GET THE LOT TWO. >>BECAUSE WHEN YOU SAY THIS. THE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH IS ALLOWED ÃÃ [INDISCERNIBLE] THE DOWNSTREAM SIGNIFICANCE OF

IT. >>I BELIEVE WE KIND OF POINTED THAT OUT IN OUR ORDINANCE.

KIND OF PIGGYBACKING ON WHAT CLYDE SAID AND THE SPEAKER BEFORE CLYDE CAME UP AND MENTIONED IT. AS YOU GUYS KNOW, WITH THE NPD, WHAT'S APPROVED IN THE PEE DEE IS WHAT'S APPROVED ANYTHING ÃÃIF ANYBODY WANTS TO MODIFY IT IN ANY WAY. THAT THE COME BACK BEFORE PNC AND GET APPROVED.

ANYTHING OR AN APPLICANT WANTS TO COME AND WITH AN X AMOUNT OF HOMES AND ÃÃIT AREAS OUTSIDE

[03:05:01]

PNZ COUNSEL ÃÃTHAT IS SOMETHING THAT I WILL DO TO AFFECT THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD AREA OR JUST ANYTHING LIKE THAT. SO, I WANTED TO ADD THAT.

>>WHAT ABOUT THE LOTS BELOW THEM? THAT'S 50 AND IS THAT THE FIRST 40? [LAUGHTER] I'M CONFUSED LOOKING AT THE PICTURE. THAT BLOWS MY MIND.

[INDISCERNIBLE] >>WE ARE REFERENCING THE 40 FOOT.

THE DRIVEWAY CONNECT TO THE 300 FOOT LOT. >>THE LOT IS 300 FEET HIGH? THAT'S WHAT I'M ASKING. [INDISCERNIBLE] I WOULD THINK THE DRIVE IS 40 FEET, BUT NOT THE WHOLE LOT. OKAY, NOW IT MAKES SENSE.

>>SO, I HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS. NOT THAT IT MATTERS BECAUSE IT'S DIFFERENT. BECAUSE IT'S A DRIVEWAY. CITY REQUIREMENT IS 40 FEET.

IT'S 40 FEET RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE GET UP INTO INTERIOR SUBDIVISIONS.

BUT THE COUPLE QUESTIONS THAT I HAVE ÃÃWE ARE NOT TECHNICALLY NEGOTIATING, NOT ARGUING THE USE. THE USE CAN ONLY BE RESIDENTIAL AND/OR CHURCH.

>>YES SIR. >>CURRENTLY IT CAN BE RESIDENTIAL AND OR CHURCH, BECAUSE [INDISCERNIBLE] THE USE TAKING OF THE QUESTION ÃÃWHAT REALLY IT COMES DOWN TO IS THE SUBDIVISION OF THE LOTS.

AND THAT'S GOING TO LEAD TO MY QUESTION. TYPICALLY WHEN WE SUBDIVIDE PROPERTY AND I'VE DONE A TON OF DRC RATINGS. I'VE NEVER SEEN STAFF BE OKAY WITH THIS. HONESTLY, I'M SURPRISED THE FIRE MARSHAL HAS SAID ANYTHING.

A 40 FOOT ROADWAY RIGHT HERE Ã ÃIN MY EXPERIENCE, WHAT THE CITY TYPICALLY REQUIRES IS FOR THEM TO TIE INTO THE NEIGHBORING ROAD ACROSS THE STREET.

AND POOR A SUBSTRATE FOR ACCESS TO A SECONDARY PROPERTY. IN MY EXPERIENCE.

IT LED US TO DO A 40 FOOT WIDTH OFF OF 663 INSTEAD OF MAKING THEM TO A SLIP STREET OR SLIP DRIVE OR WHATEVER YOU WANT TO CALL IT. SIDE OF THE PROPERTY.

>>YES. I WILL SECOND THAT. WITH THIS BEING A CITY COUNCILMAN'S ISSUE. PUT ON THE AGENDA. I WONDER WHY STAFF WENT ALONG WITH RECOMMENDING APPROVAL ON THIS. BASED ON THE COUNCILMAN QUICKLY

STATED. >>SO.

[INDISCERNIBLE] >>ON THE TOPIC ÃÃ [INDISCERNIBLE] THIS IS A UNIQUE PIECE OF PROPERTY. AND WHAT WE HAVE DONE AND PROVIDED WITH IS ACCESS TO THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY. WHAT IS THE TOTAL ACREAGE HERE?

NINE? >>IT'S NOT A LOT OF ACRES. >>IN THE SUN

>>JUST UNDER FIVE? WE TRY TO BE FLEXIBLE HERE AND WE DID THAT FOR ANY APPLICANT OR TAXPAYER ANYTHING. AS FAR AS THE SLIP STREET GOES ÃÃTHAT'S MORE FOR MULTIPLE FAMILIES. NOT MULTIPLE FAMILIES, BUT MULTIPLE LOTS OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. THAT IS WHAT WE WOULD REQUIRE THE SLIP STREET TO GO UP TO INTERSECTION. NOT JUST A SINGLE DRIVEWAY. SO, THAT'S PROVIDING A SINGLE FAMILY TRIPS A DAY ÃÃTHEN WE WOULD REQUIRE THAT SLIP STRICT GO IN.

>>THAT'S THE DIFFERENCE PAID THE AMOUNT DENSITY PUT ONTO IT. WE DID IT ON IT.

WE DID IT ON A TWO ACRE PARCEL. IT ONLY HAD TWO USES ON IT. THAT'S THE ONLY REASON I WAS ASKING. ONE OF THEM IS A LOT SMALLER THAN WE HAD.

AND THEN MY SECOND ONE IS THE HUNDRED AND 50 FEET. TYPICALLY I FIGURED ON THESE TYPES OF SUBDIVISIONS TYING Ã THAT THE THOROUGHFARE REQUIRES 150 FEET.

BECAUSE OF EMERGENCY ACCESS WITH FIRETRUCKS. AND HAVING MULTIPLE TURN AND

TURN OUT SPACING FOR CARS. >>I THINK THAT'S WHAT COAL REFERENCED EARLIER.

THIS IS WHAT TEXT THAT RECOMMENDED EARLY. TEXT DATA.

THE ENGINEER CAME UP AND IT TALKED ABOUT TEXT.AND WORKING WITH US.

TEXT.OR EXPLAINED TO THEM. I'M NOT SURE WHAT THE CONVERSATION IS BETWEEN THEM AND TEXTILE. I DO UNDERSTAND THAT THEY ARE IN CONVERSATION WITH THEM RIGHT

AWAY. >>,5131 RANCH CEDAR ROAD. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF TEXAS. WE MADE APPLICATION TO CHRIS WALKER AND TEXT.

OVER THE DISTRICT OFFICE. AND HE IS GOOD WITH THE DRIVEWAY INTO THE SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS. ONE OF THE NINE ACRES IS DEVELOPED.

THE ENTRANCE INTO NINE ACRE WILL BE BACK ACROSS HILLCREST. AND THERE WILL BE A LEFT TURN MOVEMENT. IT'LL BE A FULL INTERCHANGE THERE.

AND I THINK FROM COLBY'S POINT OUT IN THE DRIVEWAY ÃÃTHE SINGLE-FAMILY LOT ÃÃTHAT WILL BE RIGHT INTO THE DRIVE AND WRITE OUT INTO THE 663. THERE WILL BE NO LEFT-HAND TURN ASKING FOR ONE THERE. SO, I DO AGREE. IF WE WERE DOING MULTIPLE LOTS

[03:10:01]

THEY MIGHT BE ABLE TO BUILD A BIGGER HOUSE. THE 40 FEET, THE RECENT WE GET THE FLIGHT OUT IS BY ORDINANCE, WE HAVE TO HAVE PUBLIC FRONTAGE ON A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.

AND SO THE EASEMENT. THROUGH THE NINE ACRES ÃÃIT WOULD SATISFY THAT.

AND SO, WE'VE GONE THROUGH ITERATIONS LIKE THIS FOR A YEAR NOW.

AND THIS IS OBVIOUSLY WHAT WE FINALLY AGREED ON. WE COULD GET ACCESS WITH THE 40 FOOT DRIVE. GET TO THE REALLY NICE 305 THIS IS 400 FOOT LOT AND BACK.

AND THEN HAVE THAT NINE ACRE USE UPFRONT. FOR WHAT WE THINK NOT WILL

PROBABLY BE A CHURCH USE. >>I WILL QUESTION. SIR, YOU SAID PROBABLY A

CHURCH? >>I WILL RESTATE THAT. JUST WRITTEN TO BE A CHURCH,

YES SIR. >>THANK YOU. >>CHIEF?

>>I JUST WANT TO MAKE MYSELF AVAILABLE IF THERE WAS ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS ABOUT

WHAT WE ARE AUTHORIZING AS STAFF. >>NO.

IF YOU GUYS ARE OKAY WITH THE 40 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE FIRE TRUCK BACK THERE.

>>IT'S PRIVATE DRIVE. WE DO NOT RECOMMEND DRIVES. IT'S A FLIGHT LOT.

WE HAVE THEM ALL OVER THE TOWN. >>OKAY. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU CHIEF. >>THANK YOU. >>IF THERE ARE NO FURTHER

QUESTIONS. WE WILL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE. >>MOTION TO CLOSE A PUBLIC

HEARING? >>MOTION ENCLOSED. SECONDED.

>>THE ITEM IS CLOSED. 50 DISCUSSION. COUNCILMAN?

>>MORE OF JUST A COMMENT. AND ON THE PUBLIC WITH THE USES.

OR THE SUBDIVISION OF THE PROPERTY ÃÃTHE ISSUE ÃÃI DID GET ANSWERS TO THE 40 FOOT WIDTH. I WASN'T SAYING THAT STAFF HAD DONE ANYTHING FOUL.

I WAS IS CURIOUS BECAUSE TYPICALLY IN THE DEVELOPMENT. THEY DO REQUIRE THE SLIPS OR MORE. AND SO DOES THE FIRE MARSHAL. BEEN MADE CLEAR THAT IT'S A DRIVEWAY AND NOT A ROAD.ND SO, I UNDERSTAND WHY IT'S ONLY 40 FEET.

SO, THANK YOU. STAFF FOR ANSWERING THOSE QUESTIONS.

>>IF THERE'S NO MORE COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS. I WILL MAKE EIGHT MOTION TO PRESENT.OTION TO APPROVE THE PRESENTED ÃÃPLEASE VOTE. SERVE ÃÃ [INDISCERNIBLE] THE ITEM PASSES 4Ä. I WILL TAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN

PLEASE. >>MAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN. >>MOTION TO ADJOURN HAS BEEN MADE. SECOND. PLEASE VOTE.

EVERYBODY PLEASE VOTE. I GUESS WE COULD HAVE HAD

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.