Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[00:00:07]

CALL THIS MEETING TO ORDER. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

[001 Citizens to be heard-The Planning & Zoning Commission invites citizens to address the Commission on any topic not already scheduled for a Public Hearing. Citizens wishing to speak should complete a “Citizen Participation Form” and present it to City Staff prior to the meeting. In accordance with the Texas Open Meetings Act, the Commission cannot act on items not listed on the agenda.]

WE DO HAVE A QUORUM PRESENT, SO, WE LOOK FORWARD TO ITEM 001. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION INVITES CITIZENS TO ADJUST THE COMMISSION ON TOPICS NOT ALREADY SET FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK SHOULD COMPLETE A CITIZEN PARTICIPATION FORUMS, AND SUBMITTED TO CITY STAFF PRIOR T THE MEETING. IN ACCORDANCE TO THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT, TH COMMISSION CANNOT ACT ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA.

SPEAKERS WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES. WITH THAT, WE HAVE TWO PEOPLE WHO WISH TO SPEAK UNDER CITIZENS TO BE HEARD. THE FIRST ONE BEING MISS VENTURA. IS THA CORRECT?

>> YES THERE. >> ALL RIGHT.

>> MISTY VENTURA -- >> IF YOU COULD TURN HER MIKE O

THERE? >> MISTY VENTURA , DALLAS TEXAS 75218, ON BEHALF OF THE PULMONARY PLAT APPLICANT JAYNA LIVINGSTON, YOU HAVE ON YOUR CONSENT AGENDA TONIGHT A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE HEIRLOOM PHASE ONE AMENITY CENTER. WE ARE GRATEFUL THAT STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL, BECAUSE THIS PLAT DOES COMPLY WITH THE CITY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS. WE WANTED TO SHARE WITH THE COMMUNITY THAT WE ARE EXCITED ABOUT THIS PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT THAT INTENDS TO CONSTRUCT ON THAT PLATTED LOT AND AMENITY CENTER . IF THERE QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT AMENITY CENTER, I AM AVAILABLE TO

ANSWER THOSE. THANK YOU. >> THINK YOU VERY MUCH. NEXT, WE HAVE LISA HEALY? LISA, IF YOU IDENTIFY YOURSELF?

>> HI, MY NAME IS -- HI, MY NAME IS LISA HEALY, 418 MILLIGA DRIVE IN MIDLOTHIAN, TEXAS. I HAVE TWO THINGS I WANTED TO TALK ABOUT QUICKLY TONIGHT. WHEN IS THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM THAT WAS JUST MENTIONED BY THE OTHER SPEAKER. I UNDERSTAND THAT THEY ARE REQUESTING A PRELIMINARY PLAT. THIS IS A HUGE PROJECT , AND I WOULD ASK THAT THE COMMITTEE MOVE IT OFF CONSENT AGENDA , AND MOVE IT TO ANOTHER NIGHT . FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND , THE ORDER IS TO HAVE SOMETHING ZONED BEFORE YO DO THE PLATS. THIS IS ZONED AG AND I'M NOT SURE HOW AND AMENIT CENTER FALLS UNDER AGRICULTURA UNLESS IT IS, LIKE, A BARN OF SOME SORT. SO, THAT IS MY ONE REQUEST. IF WE COULD JUST BE REALLY DISCERNING , BECAUSE THI IS A HUGE PIECE OF PROPERTY, A HUGE PROJECT , IT HASN'T BEEN FINAL APPROVED FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND . THERE IS A LAWSUIT INVOLVED THAT THE COUNTY IS INVOLVED IN , IT IS BETWEEN TWO ROADS, IT IS IS HUGE AND MASSIVE. I WOULD LOVE FOR US T STAY IN PROCESS , AND TO THIS PROJECT AS THE GUIDELINES REQUIRE. THE SECOND THING IS , I HAVE BEEN ATTENDING THESE MEETINGS MONTH OVER MONTH, AND HAVE NOTICED THAT SOME OF THE THINGS THAT THE COMMITTEE HAS NOT APPROVED GOES TO CITY COUNCIL, AND IT IS PRESENTED TO CITY COUNCIL IN A DIFFERENT MANNER THAN IT WAS PRESENTED TO PNC. AND THEN, CITY COUNCIL APPROVES IT. MOST SPECIFICALLY WAS , AND YOU WILL HEAR ABOUT I TONIGHT , BECAUSE THAT FULL TEL YOU ABOUT WHAT WAS APPROVED AT THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON THE 10TH , IT WAS THE ONE ON FIFTH STREET WITH PARKING ISSUES .

THEY WENT AND PRESENTED TO CITY COUNCIL , AND THEY ARE KNOCKING DOWN THE GARAGE , ADDING ADDITIONAL CEMENT, IT IS GOING TO BE ALL CEMENT. I KNOW THAT IF A PERSON WANTED TO PUT A POO IN THEIR BACKYARD, THEY CAN'T HAVE ALL CEMENT. SO, I JUST WAN US TO BE THOUGHTFUL, AND THERE IS NO RULE, AND I WOULD LOVE TO WORK WITH P AND Z IN THE CITY T TRY AND MAKE A RULE THAT THERE IS A COOLING OFF PERIOD. THAT ITEM WAS ALREADY ON THE JANUAR 10TH AGENDA BEFORE YOU EVEN HEARD IT. BECAUSE THEY HAD TO PUBLISH IT. SO, I AM JUST ASKING THAT WE MAKE A RULE, AND IT IS STILL TIMELY. WE MAKE A RULE TO HAVE A COOLING OFF PERIOD, AND THEY COME BACK, AN THEY PRESENTED TO GET APPROVED

[00:05:03]

BY YOU BEFORE GOING TO CITY COUNCIL. THANK YOU.

[002 Staff review of the cases that were heard by City Council in the last sixty (60) days.]

>> OKAY, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE GO NOW TO ITEM 002, STAFF

REVIEW. >> IT EVENING, COMMISSION. HOW ARE YOU GUYS? I KNOW THIS IS M FIRST TIME SEEING YOU GUYS SINC THE NEW YEAR'S. I HOPE YOU ARE HAVING A HAPPY NEW YEAR. I HOPE YOU HAD A GREAT CHRISTMAS AS WELL. I WILL COVER THE ITEMS THAT WERE REVIEWED AT THE JANUARY 10TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING. AS YOU CAN SEE ON SCREEN IN HERE, FIRST CASE, WHICH IS THE CASE IT WAS JUST MENTIONED --, THAT WAS FOR 209 FOR SOUTH STREET PD AMENDMENT. THAT WAS APPROVED BY COUNCILS A AMENDED 70. AS YOU GUYS SEE HERE. THE PREVIOUS RESIDENT JUST MENTIONED , ONE OF THE MAI TOPICS OF THAT ONE WAS THE PARKING. IF YOU GUYS REMEMBER, WE HAD THE RESIDENT THAT LIVED COUPLE OF DOORS DOWN THAT COMPLAINT ABOUT THE PARKING.

ONE THING THAT CHANGE FOR THE COUNCILS AT THAT RESIDENT ENDED UP SPEAKING WITH THE APPLICANT, THE APPLICANT WASN'T AT THE P AND Z MEETING AS WELL , IF YOU GUYS ARE MEMBER, THEY WERE ABLE TO WORK OUT, YOU KNOW, AND UNDERSTANDING. NOTHING CHANGED FROM THAT PLAN , AND WHAT SHE PRESENTED TO YOU GUYS WAS TAKEN TO THE COUNCIL. SINCE THAT NEIGHBOR CAME AND SPOKE AT THE COUNCIL THING HEY, I WASN'T AT AND Z, I AM LETTING IS THAT WE WORKED IT OUT, I AM GOOD WITH IT, I ALLEVIATED IT , AND THAT ALLEVIATED COUNCILS CONCERNS ON THAT. THAT WAS THE THING BETWEE

THOSE TWO. >> CAN WE ASK A STAFF QUESTING IN THE SETTING? SO, I AM CURIOUS, BECAUSE I LIVE ABOUT FOUR HOUSES UP , AND I LIVE IN THAT REGION. I AM AFFECTED DIRECTLY , AND WAS AFFECTED RECENTLY. I WAS AFFECTED ON TH SPUR TRAFFIC. WHAT DID THEY DO TO REMEDY PARKING ISSUES , WHICH I DID RECENTLY AND DEALT WITH MYSELF. ARE THEY PAINTING THE ALLEY? IN OTHER WORDS, AND MY MIND, IF THEY ALREADY HAVE PARKING ROLLING OUT ON THE STREETS NOW , AND THEY OVER DOUBLE THE SIZE OF ITS, UNLESS THEY DID SOMETHING MAJOR , THEY ARE DOUBLING THE PROBLEM. SO, TELL ME WHAT THEY DID TO REMEDY THE PROBLEM. HE SAID PARKING HAD BEEN DEALT WITH, AND EVERYBODY IS HAPPY NOW. HOW ARE THEY HAPPY?

>> SO, I COULD TELL YOU WHAT TH APPLICANT RESIDENT DO NOT DISCUSS WAS, HEY, THIS IS WHAT WE SPOKE ABOUT, THIS IS WHAT I'M OKAY WITH. PERSONALLY, I CAN RELATE TO THAT INFORMATION TO YOU. AT THE LAST MEETING, I HEARD THE LINE CARDS WERE IN A LINE IN THE STREET. THERE ARE ALSO ADJACENT TO THE HAIR SALON IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN. I BELIEVE THAT TRAFFIC OVERFLOWING WAS WITH THAT AS WELL. ANOTHER TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION. HE DID NOT GO INTO WHAT THEY DISCUSSED, HE JUST SAID, HEY, WE DISCUSSED AMONGST EACH OTHER, AND WE ARE COOL

WITH IT. >> YOU REMEMBER, I DON'T REMEMBER, WITH A TALKING ABOUT THE ALLEY ON THAT? OKAY, ALL

RIGHT, THANK YOU. >> DOES ANSWER YOUR QUESTION?

>> YES SIR.

>> YEAH. NOTHING CHANGED FROM WHAT WAS PRESENTED TO YOU GUYS.

SINCE I DID LEAVE LIVE IN THE REGION, IF THEY DID HAVE OVERFLOW INTO THE STREET, AS I UNDERSTOOD , THE POLICE CAN'T REALLY DO ANYTHING ABOUT THAT. IS THAT CORRECT? AS LONG AS THEY ARE PARKED ILLEGALLY ON THE SIDELINE OF THE STREET, AND

IT'S A PUBLIC STREET -- >> IT IS A PUBLIC STREET. THERE IS RIGHT AWAY THAT WOULD GO SIMILAR TO COUNTRY SOUTH OR THE

ACRE SUBDIVISIONS. >> WELL, THEY ARE NOT ON A

SPUR. >> RIGHT. NO, I UNDERSTAND.

>> SO, THIS'LL BE A GOOD ONE TO KEEP AN EYE ON. THANK YOU.

>> ALL RIGHT. MOVING DOWN TO OUR SECOND ONE, BILLBOARD SIGNS. THIS WAS PRESENTED TO YOU GUYS AT THE NOVEMBER 15TH PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING. WE DECIDED TO DENY THAT ONE. AS YOU TO THE FAR RIGHT THERE, COUNCIL VOTED 4-3, EXCUSE ME.

GOING DOWN TO THE THIRD ONE , THE HARVEST SEAL PD AMENDMENT,

[00:10:01]

THAT WAS CONTINUED TO FEBRUARY 14TH, 2023. CITY COUNCIL MEETING AND P AND Z APPROVED, AND THAT WAS OVER THERE BY THE BURGER KING AND ARBY'S IN THAT AREA. LASTLY, THE TEXAN AMENDMENT. P AND Z VOTED TO AMEND 50 PER COMMON. IF YOUR MEMBER WHEN WE PRESENTED THREE CHANGES, IF WE WILL, IN THE SUBDIVISION, YOU APPROVED TWO, BUT WE DISCUSS IDEALS OR BUILDERS. INSTEAD OF VISITING IT TO COUNSEL, WE WILL PRESENT THOSE TWO MORE BUILDERS. ONCE WE GATHER MORE INFORMATION, WE'LL PUT IT BACK ON THE FUTURE AGENDA HOPEFULLY. SO, THAT CONCLUDES ALL OF THE ITEMS DISCUSSED AT THE JANUARY 10TH

CITY COUNCIL MEETING. >> SO, WE WILL BE GOING BACK UP

TO THE BILLBOARD? >> YES SIR?

>> THAT WAS A BIG ELECTRIC SIGN?

>> YES SIR. >> WHAT HAPPENED? IN ANY GREAT DETAIL, CAN YOU DELINEATE WHAT WAS IN CONTENTION?

>> RIGHT. THERE WERE DIFFERENT DISCUSSIONS. AS YOU GUYS KNOW, THE APPLICANT PRESENTED A FOUR MINUTE VIDEO. HE DISCUSSED THAT ONE OF THE PRIMARY REASONS FOR THIS, HE WANTED TO PROMOTE LOCAL BUSINESSES WITHIN THE CITY. THE COUNCIL, DURING THE DISCUSSION, ONE OF THE TOPICS OF DISCUSSION WITH WHAT IS LOCAL IS LOCAL , LIKE, YOUR STANDARD DOWNTOWN BUSINESS , OR CAN A MCDONNELL FRANCHISEE BE A LOCAL BUSINESS AS WELL? YOU KNOW, MOST PEOPLE CONSIDER MCDONALD'S CORPORATION. IT GOT INTO THAT, AND WE DID NOT END UP CLEARING THAT UP. DUE TO THAT, THERE IS A SPLIT VOTE. THERE WAS AN OFFER TO CONTINUE TO THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING, HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT ON IT TO GET THAT PHOTO THAT NIGHT. SO, THAT WAS THE RESULT OF THAT, SO, WE WILL HAVE TO WAIT ANOTHER SIX MONTHS.

>> OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

>> ANYONE ELSE HAVE QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME? OKAY, THANK YOU,

[CONSENT AGENDA]

COBY. OKAY. ITEM 003 , 004, AND 005 , LISTED ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. ANYBODY WANT ANYTHING WITHDRAWN FROM THE CONSENT

AGENDA? >> I HAVE A QUESTION. I AT LEAST WANT TO GET A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF -- INDISCERNIBLE - LOW VOLUME ] IS THAT CORRECT?

>> IT WOULD BE UP TO THE DISCRETION OF THE

COMMISSIONERS. >> NOT YET. I PROBABLY WILL IN

A MINUTE. >> I AM JUST ASKING UPON A

REQUEST. >> SO, ARE YOU REQUESTING THEY

PULL IT OFF? >> I REQUEST THAT WE PUT OFF SO

WE CAN DISCUSS IT. >> OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THAT BEING THE CASE , WE HAVE 003 AND 004 ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE THOSE ITEMS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA?

[005 Consider and act upon a request for a Preliminary Plat of Heirloom Phase One (1), Amenity Center, being ±71.552 acres out of the S. Smith Survey, Abstract 973, and the R. Rowles Survey, Abstract 938. The property is located on FM 875 east of Baucum Road. (Case No. PP24-2022-206).]

>> I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.

>> SECOND. >> WE HAVE A MOTION AT A SECOND. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE?

>> AYE. >> AYE.

>> AYE. >> ALL OPPOSED? WE WILL NOW TAKE ITEM 005, CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A REQUEST FOR APRIL LUMINARY PLAT OF HEIRLOOM PHASE ONE, AMENITY CENTER, INC. 71.552 ACRES OUT OF THE S. SMITH SURVEY, ABSTRACT 937, AND OUR. RAUL SURVEY, ABSTRACT 938.

>> I HAVE A QUESTION BEFORE YOU START. IS THERE A WAY TO FIND THIS ON WHERE THIS IS LOCATED?

>> OKAY. BEFORE YOU START , STAFF, DO YOU WANT TO PRESENT? DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING YOU WANT TO PRESENT PRIOR TO THE

APPLICANT? >> I'M ACTUALLY NOT THE

APPLICANT. I AM STAFF. >> YOUR STAFF?

>> I AM, I AM. >> SORRY ABOUT THAT. I HAVEN'T HAD A CHANCE TO MEET YOU YET.

>> NO, SORRY, I JUST WANTED TO SAY THIS REAL QUICK, I MENTIONED THIS IN MY RECAP, YOU GUYS ARE USED TO SEEING MYSELF APPEAR, BUT, LESLIE, YOU CAN SEE HER ALL THE TIME OVER HERE.

SHE DOES A LOT OF THE GROUNDWORK AS WELL. SHE WILL START PRESENTING THESE CASES AS WELL. SO, FORGIVE ME FOR NOT GIVING A PROPER INTRODUCTION, BUT LESLIE REAGAN, SHE REALLY

RUNS THIS DEPARTMENT. >> I HAVE BEEN ASKING LESLIE

TO SPEAK. THIS IS A BIG ONE. >> SORRY ABOUT THAT, LESLIE.

YOU GO RIGHT AHEAD. >> OKAY. JUST AS THE CHAIRMAN MENTIONED, THIS IS A REQUEST FOR APRIL LUMINARY PLAT OF HEIRLOOM PHASE ONE AMENITY CENTER . IT CONSISTS OF 71.522 ACRES , AND TWO SEPARATE LOTS. IT IS LOCATED ON SM 875 . WATER IN THIS AREA WILL BE GIVEN BY -- AND THE SEWER WILL BE

[00:15:02]

PROVIDED BY HIGHLAND LAKES , THE M UD DISTRICT. WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL , AS IS PRESENTED. IS MEETING ALL OF THE STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. AGAIN, JUST KEEP IN MIND, WE ARE , THIS IS JUST THE PLATTING. I UNDERSTAND THAT, YOU KNOW, THIS IS PART OF A LARGER DEVELOPMENT, BUT ALL WE ARE DOING TONIGHT IS REVIEWING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT, AND MAKING A DECISION ON THAT.

>> OKAY. A QUESTION WAS ASKED EARLIER, OR A COMMENT ABOUT THE ZONING BEING AGRICULTURE . DOES THIS MEET AGRICULTURE

ZONING? >> I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT, WELL, THE APPLICATION BEING RECOMMENDED FOR STAFF , YES, THE PLENARY PLAT WILL QUALIFY WITH THE EXISTING ZONE.

>> OKAY. I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT SINCE THE PUBLIC

HAD THE COMMON. >> AND I'M JUST CLARIFYING WHAT YOU SAID.

OF THIS, WHAT IS IT? >> IT'S A 70 ACRE TRACT OF LAND. IT'S LOCATED SOUTH OF -- THIS IS JUST A PLAT , A PLAT.

IT IS A PLENARY PLAT. I ASSUME THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE IT A JOY, MAYBE HAS MET RESTROOMS, MAYBE IS A SWIMMING POOL. MISS ROGERS, JUST BECAUSE IT'S CALLED AN AMENITY CENTER, IT DOESN'T COME WITH ANY DESCRIPTION OF WHAT THOSE

AMENITIES ARE. >> DID YOU THINK WHETHER OR

NOT TO ASK? >> YOU CAN, BUT I THINK WE ARE LITTLE PRELIMINARY IN THAT. IT'S JUST A PLATTING PROPERTY

AT THIS TIME. >> IS NOT NOT JUST AN UP OR

DOWN VOTE ON THAT? >> YES.

>> SO, BASICALLY , WE CAN VOTE -- SO, IT'S PLATTING, EVEN THOUGH IT IS IN AG, AND WE WILL VOTE EVEN IF WE ARE NOT

DETERMINING -- >> YOU KIND OF HAVE TO DO IT

THIS WAY. >> I KNOW, BUT I AM ADDRESSING

THIS DONE FOR A REASON. >> MAYBE WHEN IT IS DONE WITH THE RE-ZONE, THEN WE START ENTERING THE MAJORITY OF IT.

>> NOT ALWAYS. >> WELL, THE MAJORITY OF THE TIME, BUT THAT'S NOT A REQUIREMENT. AND IF WE TAKE A POSITION, WE ARE TAKING THE POSITION THAT THIS IS WITH AG AND ZONING. IT'S IN THE CITY , IT'S WITH THE REST OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT. TALK WITH A REQUEST FOR THE RESIDENT, WHICH IS MY INTENTION, WE ARE LEGALLY BOUND TO GO AHEAD AND PASSES THROUGH ON A CONSENT AGENDA BECAUSE THIS FALLS WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF WHAT OUR ORDINANCES AND BUILDING STANDARDS ARE. SO, WE HAVE TO MOVE FORWARD, CORRECT?

>> THAT IS CORRECT. BECAUSE IT COMPLIES WITH EXISTING SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND STATE LAW, YES.

>> AND WE DON'T HAVE THE ABILITY AT THIS POINT TO ASK OR UNDERSTAND WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN? WE ONLY HAVE THE ABILITY TO APPROVE OR REPLAN --

>> AT THIS POINT IN TIME , IT IS OUR MISSION THAT THE USES ARE PARTICULARLY RELEVANT AS IT RELATES TO, AS LONG AS IT COMPLIES WITH ZONING , AND ANY FUTURE USE RIGHT NOW IS STILL UP IN THE AIR. NOW, I THINK THE APPLICANT IS GOING TO TELL YOU , SINCE SHE IS REPRESENT A DURING CITIZENS COMMENTS , THAT THEY PLAN ON CONSTRUCTING AN AMENITY CENTER FOR THIS PROPERTY. BUT, AT THIS POINT, THAT IS REALLY NOT A RELEVANT ISSUE TO THE SUBDIVISION AS IT STANDS RIGHT NOW.

>> MR. ROGERS, AS A POINT OF INFORMATION, THE THREE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS REQUIRES EVERY PULMONARY PLAT APPLICANT TO SUBMIT WITH THEIR PULMONARY PLAT APPLICATION A GENERAL CONCEPT PLAN WHEN A NONRESIDENTIAL USE IS PROPOSED.

IN THIS APPLICANT, AND COMPLIANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS, DID SUBMIT A CONCEPT PLAN. SO, THERE IS INFORMATION IN THE APPLICANT'S PACKAGE ABOUT THIS PROPOSED

USE. >> BUT, THE ZONING IS NOT AN

ISSUE FOR THE CITY. >> AGREED. THIS IS A SUBDIVISION REGULATION PROCESS.

>> IS THAT INFORMATION FOR PROPOSED USE FOR PUBLIC RECORD FOR THE RESIDENT TO REQUEST IT?

>> YES SIR. I AND I HAVE A COPYRIGHT HERE THAT I'M HAPPY TO SHARE WITH YOU OR HER. YES SIR.

>> ABSOLUTELY. >> THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. >> OKAY. JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, THIS IS NOT A CONSENT ITEM ? WE ARE NOT CONSIDERING IT AS A SEPARATE ITEM? APPLICANT? IS THE

[00:20:01]

APPLICANT HERE ? >> THAT IS WHO WAS JUST

SPEAKING. >> KRISTI VENTURA, 956 VENTURA

BOULEVARD . >> I WILL CATCH UP YOUR IN A MINUTE.

TWO. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?

>> NONE. >> OKAY, THANK YOU SO MUCH.

>> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU SO MUCH.

>> DISCUSSION? >> NOTHING, JUST THE PLEASURE

OF THE COMMISSION. >> I WILL VOTE TO MOTION.

>> SECOND. >> WE HAVE A MOTION AND A

[006 Conduct a public hearing and consider and act upon an ordinance for a Specific Use Permit on Lot C.A. 4, Massey Meadows, to allow for a residential subdivision sign located on .039 acres, facing F.M. 1387, near the entrance of the Massey Meadows subdivision (Case No. SUP29-2022-205).]

SECOND TO APPROVE, AND HE FOR THE DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR,

SAY AYE? C.A. 4 >> AYE.

>> AYE. >> VILDOZA POST? UNANIMOUS. I MOVED ITEM 006, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER AND ACT UPON AN ORDINANCE FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT ON LOT C.A.

4 MASSEY MEADOWS, TO ALLOW FOR RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION SIGN LOCATED ON .039 ACRES, FACING FM 137 , NEAR THE ENTRANCE OF

MASSEY MEADOWS SUBDIVISION. >> THANK YOU. THIS IS FOR A HOMEBUILDER SIGN AT THE ENTRANCE OF MASSEY MEADOWS, PER SECTION 4.6 00E OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE. THESE TYPES OF SIGNS ARE ALLOWED, BUT, WHEN THEY ARE ALLOWED, THEY HAVE VARIOUS REQUIREMENTS. ONE OF THE GARMENTS IS THAT IF IT IS FACING AN EXISTING OR PROPOSED THOROUGHFARE THAT IS GREATER THAN 80 FEET IN WIDTH, THEY ARE REQUIRED TO COME FORTH WITH IN SEP. SO, THAT IS WHAT WE ARE DOING HERE TODAY. IF YOU LOOK UP HERE, YOU CAN SEE WHERE THEY ARE REQUESTING THE SIGN LOCATION TO BE. THAT IS ACTUALLY IN A COMMON AREA ADJACENT TO FM 1387. AND THEN, HERE IS A RENDERING OF THE SIGN THAT THEY ARE PROPOSING. IT IS 64 SQUARE FEET IN AREA, WHICH IS WELL BEFORE BELOW WHAT WE ALLOW FOR SIGN AREAS OF 100 SQUARE FEET , AND THEY ARE ASKING FOR 14 FEET IN HEIGHT , AND WE ALLOW FOR 15 FEET. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. WE DID NOT HAVE ANY RESPONSES IN FAVOR OR AGAINST, AND STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THIS AGENDA ITEM.

>> YOUR STAFF, RIGHT? >> I AM STAFF. THAT WOULD BE

ME. >> I'M ONLY KIDDING. I'M GIVING KOBE A HARD TIME. ANY QUESTIONS THE STAFF? OKAY. THE

APPLICANT PRESENT? >> I DON'T BELIEVE THEY ARE

PRESENT, SIR. >> OKAY. WE HAVE NO ONE ELSE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK. SO, WITH THAT, I MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC

HEARING. >> MOTION, SECOND.

>> ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE? >> AYE.

>> AYE. >> AYE.

>> I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.

[007 Conduct a public hearing and consider and act upon an ordinance for a Specific Use Permit on Lot C.A. 7, Villages of Walnut Grove, Phase One (1), to allow for a residential subdivision sign located on .593 acres, being Lot C.A. 7 of Villages of Walnut Grove, Phase One (1), facing Walnut Grove Road, near the entrance of the Villages of Walnut Grove subdivision (Case No. SUP30-2022-209).]

>> SECOND. >> WITH EMOTION IT A SECOND TO APPROVE. ANY FOR THE DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR, SAY

AYE. >> AYE.

>> AYE. >> AYE.

>> ALL OPPOSED? UNANIMOUS. ITEM 007, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER AND ACT UPON AN ORDINANCE FOR A SPECIFIC BUILD PERMIT ON LOT CA 7 , VILLAGES OF WALNUT ROAD, PHASE ONE, TO ALLOW FOR RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION SIGN LOCATED ON .59 ACRES, BEING LOT C.A. 7 OF VILLAGES OF WALNUT ROAD, PHASE ONE, FACING WALNUT GROVE ROAD, NEAR THE ENTRANCE OF THE VILLAGES OF WALNUT ROAD SOLUTION.

>> THANK YOU. JUST LIKE LAST TIME, THE SIGN IS AT THE ENTRANCE OF WALNUT GROVE ROAD, ON SOUTH WALNUT GROVE OH ROAD.

SO THAT IS LARGER THAN THE 80 FOOT READY WITH, THEY ARE REQUIRED TO REQUEST AN S U.P. THE NEXT SLIDE SHOWS YOU THE LOCATION THAT THEY ARE ASKING TO PLACE THE SIGN , AND HERE IS A RENDERING OF THE SIGN. AGAIN, WELL BENEATH THE REGULATIONS THAT ARE SET FORTH IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE.

>> QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT?

>> THEY ARE NOT. >> AND WE HAVE NO INCENTIVE TO SPEAK. I MOTION A MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.

>> MOTION. >> CLOSE.

>> ALL IN FAVOR TO CLOSE A PUBLIC HEARING?

>> AYE. >> AYE.

>> AYE.. >> MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC

[008 Conduct a public hearing and consider and act upon a request for a Specific Use Permit for a townhome residential development within Planned Development 146 (PD-146). The property is generally located on Highway 287 and Old Fort Worth Road. (SUP28-2022-204) CONTINUANCE REQUESTED]

ACTION? >> MOTION.

>> SECOND. >> ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE?

>> AYE. >> AYE.

>> AYE. >> CLOSE. MOVING ONTO ITEM 008, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER AND ACT UPON

[00:25:03]

REQUEST OF A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A TOWNHOME RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPER WITHIN THE PLANE DEVELOPMENT 146. THE PROPERTY IS GENERALLY LOCATED ON HIGHWAY 287 AND OLD FORT

WORTH ROAD. >> THIS IS FOR APD AT THE WESTSIDE PRESERVE FOR AN S U.P. WITHIN THE PD FOR MULTI FAMILY AT THE WESTSIDE PRESERVE. AGAIN, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE TO THE FEBRUARY 21ST P AND Z HEARING . BASICALLY, IT IS JUST THAT THEY NEEDED MORE TIME TO GET THEIR RESUBMITTAL , AND ACTUALLY JUST GOT IT TODAY.

SO, THAT IS THE REASON FOR THE CONTINUANCE.

>> JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, I THINK WHAT IS BEING REQUESTED IS THAT WE GO AHEAD AND OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND THEN MOVED TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO THE NEXT MEETING?

>> WHICH IS WHAT WE DO FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING.

>> IF YOU SEE THE MAGIC WORDS, I BELIEVE SO.

>> OKAY. I WILL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO

[009 Conduct a public hearing and consider and act upon an ordinance amending the zoning of Planned Development No. 24 +/-27.71 acres being all of Lot 1, Block A, Walmart Addition, City of Midlothian, Ellis County, Texas in reference to a proposed expansion of the building. The property is generally located at 400 S. Highway 67. (Z52-2022-207)]

THE NEXT MEETING IS HER SECOND?

>> SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION AT A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE?

>> AYE. >> AYE.

>> ITEM 009, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER AND ACT UPON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PLANNING PLANNING OF PLANS DEVELOPMENT NUMBER 24 27.71 ACRES BEING ALL OF LOT 1, BLOCK A, WALMART ADDITION, CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN, ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS IN REFERENCE TO A OPPOSED EXPANSION OF THE BUILDING. THE PROPERTY IS GENERALLY LOCATED AT 400 S.

HIGHWAY 67. >> OMER IS SEEKING TO ADD AN 8080 SQUARE FOOT EXPANSION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING FOR A CUSTOMER PICKUP FOR THE ONLINE ORDERS. AND THERE WOULD NEED TO BE A FEW MINOR TWEAKS TO THEIR SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN .

THIS IS THE AERIAL, AND GENERALLY, AND THIS LOCATION, IS WHERE THE EXPANSION WOULD BE. SO, AS YOU CAN TELL, IT WOULD BE SET BACK BEHIND THE BUILDING, BUT NOT PROMINENT.

THIS IS, AGAIN, THE LOCATION OF WHERE THE EXPANSION WOULD BE.

THIS IS ON A SITE PLAN. THEY WOULD NEED TO DO A LITTLE BIT OF PAINT AND GRADING WORK HERE TO ASSURE A.D.A.

ACCESSIBILITY, AND, AGAIN, SOME OF THE LANDSCAPING WOULD CHANGE . THE PARKING WOULD ACTUALLY BE REDUCED, IT WOULD STILL BE MORE THAN ENOUGH . THE REQUIREMENTS, I BELIEVE, THEY WERE COMING DOWN FROM 962 TO 914 PARKING SPACES. SO, WHILE THIS PD PREDATES THE 25% MAX CAP WE NORMALLY TARGET, THEY ARE ACTUALLY COMING CLOSE TO THAT TARGET THAT, AGAIN, THEY'RE ALREADY PROVED TO HAVE 964. SO, THERE COMING CLOSER TO WHERE WE WANT PEOPLE. THE OTHER THING IS, THIS GIVES YOU A BIT OF A ZOOM IN AND IDEA OF THE FOOTPRINT OF THIS BUILDING , WHAT IS IT IMPACTING? THERE IS LANDSCAPING HERE THAT WOULD BE TAKEN OUT, AND THERE IS STILL GREATLY IN AXIS OF THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT, EVEN WITHIN THE PD. SO, THIS BIT OF LANDSCAPED AREA GOING AWAY IS PRETTY NEGLIGIBLE. THE PRESCRIPTION -- I'M SORRY, THE PHARMACY AND PERCEPTION PICKUP WINDOW, THAT STILL REMAINS DOWN HERE. THAT IS NOT GOING ANYWHERE. AGAIN, THEY ARE DOING SOME RE-STRIKING HERE, WHICH ACCOMMODATES TO SOME TRUCK PARKING , AS AN PICKUP TRUCK, NOT TRACTOR-TRAILER TRUCKS. AND, THAT REDUCES ALSO SOME OF THE FREE PARKING SPACES IN ADDITION TO THE PARKING THAT IS GOING HERE THAT IS GOING AWAY. SO, THAT IS WHY THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES IS GOING DOWN. THEN, JUST TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA, THIS KIND OF MARKS WHERE , THERE ARE FIVE EXISTING TREES .

TO ACCOMMODATE THIS EXPANSION, THEY MUST GO AWAY . THEY WILL NOT BE RELOCATED HERE. THERE WILL BE FIVE NEW TREES. THEY WILL HAVE TO HAVE AT LEAST A FOUR INCH MINIMUM CALIBER. SO, AGAIN, THEY WILL NOT RELOCATE, BUT INSTALL FIVE NEW TREES IN THE AMENDMENT OF THE CALIBER. THIS IS THE ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDING. SO, THIS IS A BIT OF A SIDE VIEW OF THE CURRENT WALMART BUILDING , AND THIS IS THE SIDE VIEW IF YOU WERE STANDING ON THE NORTH SIDE LOOKING SOUTH. THIS IS WHAT YOU WOULD SEE. AND THEN, THIS IS THE FRONT ELEVATION FOR HERE.

[00:30:01]

SIMILAR OR SAME MATERIALS AND COLOR SCHEMES, THE BRICK, THE STONE WAINSCOT, THEY ARE MATCHING THE SAME AESTHETICS AS THE BUILDING, WHICH IS ALSO REQUIRED AS PART OF THE PD.

AGAIN, THIS REQUEST IS TO ACCOMMODATE THE PICKUP ONLINE SALES. AS YOU MAY KNOW , IN THE PAST, THEY WERE APPROVED FOR SEASONAL STORAGE CONTAINERS . THAT IS A SEPARATE ISSUE. SO, BY THIS EXPANSION FOR THE ONLINE SALES , IT DOESN'T HAVE ANY BEARING ON THAT. THAT IS A SEPARATE MATTER. AND, THIS REQUEST WOULD ONLY INCREASE THE TOTAL FLOOR AREA BY ABOUT 4%. THOSE FIVE TREES, AS I MENTIONED , NEW INSTALLATION UP FRONT WITH THOSE FIVE TREES. THE JUSTICE TO THE PARKING AND LANDSCAPING ALL SEEM TO STILL BE FITTING WITHIN THE PD'S REQUIREMENTS . STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY RESPONSES FOR OR AGAINST , SO, WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL AS PRESENTED, WE WILL NOTE THAT WE DO HAVE TWO CURRENT ZONING ISSUES FOR COMPLIANCE. ONE JUST CAME UP TODAY, AND ONE CAME UP A COUPLE WEEKS AGO BASICALLY GOING TO LOOK OUT AT THE SITES TO GET A FEEL FOR ALL OF THESE PLANS MIGHT ACTUALLY MEAN , AND YOU WILL NOTICE THAT THERE IS A DECORATIVE METAL FENCING THAT IS MORE THAN 10 DEGREES BY THE DRAINAGE AREA. BUT, THEY'VE ISSUED A WORK ORDER TICKET. I DON'T HAVE AN EXACT DATE OF WHEN THAT WILL BE FIXED, BUT IT IS IN PROGRESS. THEY HAVE RESPONDED TO IT, AND WE HAVE A ZONING VIOLATION LETTER ON THAT. THEN, TODAY , GOING TO CHECK OUT A FEW THINGS , IT DID BRING TO MY ATTENTION THAT THERE ARE FIVE TREES THAT HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY IN ISSUE THAT STAFF HAD NOT HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED, BUT THERE ARE NOT ACTUALLY FOUR INCH CALIBER.

SO, THOSE NEED TO BE BROUGHT TO STANDARD. ALL OF THAT TO STAY STAFF WILL RECOMMEND APPROVAL AS PRESENTED SUBJECT TO BRINGING UP THE SITE TO COMPLIANCE. WINNING THE DECORATIVE METAL FENCE , AND THE FIVE TREES THAT ARE UNDERSIZED FOR THE FOUR INCH CALIBER. SO, WITH THAT, I WILL

TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. >> QUESTIONS? THE APPLICANT PRESENT? OKAY, IF YOU WILL COME FORWARD AND IDENTIFY

YOURSELF? >> GOOD EVENING. I AM CHRISTINA JOHNSON. I'M A PROJECT MANAGER FOR WALMART FOR THE REMODEL AND BUILDING EXPANSION PROJECTS. SO, JUST A LITTLE BIT OF CONTEXT FOR THIS BUILDING EXPANSION, THIS IS PRIMARILY TO SERVE YOUR COMMUNITY AND OUR CUSTOMERS BETTER FOR ONLINE PICKUP AND DELIVERY ORDERS , FOR OUR CUSTOMERS TO BE ABLE TO ORDER ONLINE TO THE APP OR THROUGH OUR WEBSITE TO GET THEIR GROCERIES AND GENERAL MERCHANDISE, AND THEN, BE ABLE TO PARK IN THESE PICKUP STALLS TO HAVE THEIR GROCERIES DELIVERED TO THEIR CARS. SO, REALLY, WHAT WE ARE INTENDING WITH THESE BUILDING EXPANSIONS ARE TWO, I GUESS, JUST BETTER SERVE OUR COMMUNITIES AND CUSTOMERS. AND WE WILL BE FOLLOWING THESE PLANS TO A T, AND MAKING SURE THAT WE ABIDE BY YOUR ORDINANCES. ANYTHING ELSE?

>> OKAY, QUESTIONS? THANK YOU, MA'AM.

>> THANK YOU. >> WE DON'T HAVE ANY SIGNED UP -- OH, I'M SORRY, PRESENTED TO SPEAK? OKAY. BE CAREFUL WHEN YOU STAND UP.

>> NOT STAFF, GOT IT! ALL RIGHT. THERE IS NO ONE ELSE TO SPEAK, SO, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE A PUBLIC

HEARING. >> A MOTION TO CLOSE.

>> DID I HEAR A SECOND? WE HAVE A MOTION A SECOND TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE?

>> AYE. >> AYE.

>> AYE. >> ALL RIGHT. MOTION CARRIES INITIALLY. FOUR IS OPEN TO ACTION.

>> I HAVE A COMMENT. >> SURE.

>> SORRY. I KNOW WHEN WE PASSED THE TRAILER STORES, WAS THAT, ABOUT SIX MONTHS AGO? THREE MONTHS AGO?

>> THREE. >> THE IDEA THAT WE KNEW THAT THIS WAS COMING, AND THE TRAILER STORAGE WAS A CRUTCH UNTIL THIS IS COMING, RIGHT? AND THIS WAS SUPPOSED TO ILLUMINATE THE INSUFFICIENT STORAGE OF PRODUCT IN THE WAREHOUSE , THIS MODEL OF WALMART HAD A VERY SMALL WAREHOUSE COMPARED TO SOME OTHERS. NO? THAT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING FROM THE PREVIOUS PRESENTATION. BUT, I AM HOPING THAT THIS ELIMINATES -- IT WOULD BE MY INTENTION THAT THIS ILLUMINATES THE OUTSIDE STORAGE.

>> I THINK THERE WAS DISCUSSION THAT WE HAVE STORAGE PROBLEMS

[00:35:05]

A YEAR OR SO AGO , CORRECT ME. I THOUGHT THERE WAS SOME TECH TALK THAT THAT WOULD POSSIBLY EXPAND THE BUILDING OUT INTO THE PARKING LOT. I COULD BE CORRECTED, BUT , THIS IMPROVEMENT SOUNDS TO ME LIKE IT IS STRICTLY TO AID THE CUSTOMERS TO GET GROCERIES TO GO. IS NOT FOR ADDITIONAL STORAGE TO STORE WHAT IS IN THE CONTAINERS AND WHATNOT

OUTSIDE. IS THAT CORRECT? >> RIGHT. SO, THIS ADDITION IS ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE GROCERY PICKUP. THE GROCERY PICKUP FOR CUSTOMERS. TO ANSWER YOUR STATEMENT, IS A MEMBER JUNE OR JULY LAST YEAR WHEN WALMART CAME, THERE WAS A GENTLEMAN A PART OF ALL MY STUFF THAT SAID, HEY, NEXT YEAR, WE PLAN ON EXPANDING THIS BUILDING IN THE EAGLES TO HELP ALLEVIATE THOSE CONTAINERS. SO, HE DID SAY THAT. HOWEVER, UPON RECEIVING THIS, WE THAT THIS IS NOT THE CASE. THIS EXPANSION IS STRICTLY FOR CUSTOMER GROCERY PICKUP ON THE NORTH SIDE THERE.

SO, AGAIN, IT IS MORE THAN LIKELY THAT YOU GUYS, AS WILL THE CITY COUNCIL, WILL SEE A REQUEST FOR STORAGE CONTAINERS

LATER ON THIS YEAR. >> OKAY. LET ME JUST SUPPLEMENT YOUR COMMENTS. BECAUSE I HAD TO GO BACK AND DOUBLE CHECK THIS MYSELF, BECAUSE I DID NOT RECALL , AND CONVERSATION WITH STAFF AS I WAS WRITING THE ORDINANCE , THE TOPIC CAME UP THAT THERE WAS AN ACTUAL DEADLINE , AND THAT THERE WAS IN A PERPETUAL, ANNUAL PERIOD OF TIME AND WHERE THE SEASONAL SORTS WOULD OCCUR. THE REASON I DID NOT REMEMBER THAT IS BECAUSE THE PROVISION RECOMMENDED THE CASE GO FORWARD TO COUNSEL LAST YEAR, IT DIDN'T. THAT'S WHAT IT INCLUDED, WAS AN ANNUAL NOVEMBER OR OCTOBER TO DECEMBER TIME FRAME IN WHICH THAT TEMPORARY STORAGE , WELL, THEY WENT TO CITY COUNCIL , AND THIS MAY NOT HAVE BEEN REPORTED IN THE STAFF REPORT COMING BACK TO COUNSEL WITH ACTION ON THIS ONE , BECAUSE I DON'T REMEMBER, IT WAS A MEETING I MISSED, BUT, THE COUNCIL ACTUALLY CHANGED THE ORDINANCE. SO, THE SEASONAL STORAGE CAN ONLY OCCUR BETWEEN NOVEMBER 1ST OF 2022 AND DECEMBER 31ST OF 2022. MEANING WALMART DOES HAVE TO COME BACK THIS NEXT YEAR AND DO IT ALL OVER AGAIN WITH RESPECT TO TEMPORARY STORAGE. SO, WE ARE COMING BEFORE YOU, WE ARE COMING BEFORE COUNSEL AGAIN , WHETHER THAT IS GOING TO BE THE SAME, BECAUSE WHAT RAISED IT WITH ME THAT THIS EXPANSION ACTUALLY EXPANDS INTO PART OF THE AREA WERE THE STORAGE WAS ALLOWED LAST YEAR. SO, WHAT IS TRIGGERED BY LOOKING AT IT IS THAT THIS DOES NOT, AND I WILL GET WITH BRIAN ON THIS, IS THAT THIS DOES NOT MAKE SENSE, AND THEN A LOOK AT WHAT ACTUALLY GOT PASSED VERSUS WHAT WAS, YOU KNOW, IN ORDINANCE. SO, YOU KNOW, FROM A STANDPOINT OF THAT ISSUE , YOU KNOW, RIGHT NOW , AS OF DECEMBER 31ST, THERE IS NO TEMPORARY STORAGE CONTAINERS ALLOWED ON PROPERTY. AFTER DECEMBER 31ST, 2022, BECAUSE OF THE WAY THE COUNCIL ENDED UP APPROVING THE ORDINANCE. SO, RIGHT NOW, THAT IS PART OF WHY STAFFERS ARE COMMITTING APPROVAL, IN PART BECAUSE THIS IS ONLY THE ISSUE FOR THE PICKUP ONLINE DELIVERY , YOU

KNOW, PICKUP AREA. >> THAT WAS MY RECOLLECTION FROM IT. I THINK THIS IS GREAT. AS LONG AS WE HAVE THAT

ABILITY, I AM GOOD. >> I AGREE, AND OTHER TWO SAID THAT, AND I THINK THE GENTLEMAN SAID THAT THEY WERE GOING TO EXPAND IT, AND THEN COVID HAPPEN, AND IT GOT PUT ON THE BACK BURNER. DO YOU KNOW IF THAT IS STILL IN THE PROCESS

FOR MORE STORAGE? >> NO. I CAN'T SPEAK TO THAT,

HONESTLY. GO AHEAD? >> SO, CURRENTLY, THERE ARE NO PLANS TO EXPAND THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT TO ACCOMMODATE FOR MORE FREIGHT STORAGE. THIS IS SOMETHING ACROSS THE BOARD THROUGHOUT ALL OF OUR STORES THAT, ON THE HOLIDAY TIMEFRAME FOR BLACK FRIDAY , WE HAVE AN INCREASE IN FREIGHT THAT IS TO POINT TO OUR STORES. IN THE AMOUNT OF BACKROOM SPACE THAT WE HAVE WITH OUR STORES DO NOT ACCOMMODATE THAT INCREASE IN FREIGHT. SO, THIS BUILDING EXPANSION REALLY DOES ONLY ACCOMMODATE THE ONLINE PICKUP ORDERS. THERE'LL BE A FREEZER

[00:40:01]

AND COOLER DEDICATED IN THAT SPACE , AND THEN THERE ARE THOSE ORDERS STAGING. SO, UNFORTUNATELY, THERE WILL BE ANOTHER AMENDMENT THAT WILL BE NEEDED FOR THE HOLIDAY FREIGHT STORAGE CONTAINERS , AND THERE ARE NO PLANS CURRENTLY TO INCREASE THE FOOTPRINT OF THE STORE TO ACCOMMODATE THAT

INSIDE THE STORE. >> OKAY, THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. THE FLOOR IS OPEN FOR A MOTION?

>> I WILL MOVE TO APPROVED AS PRESENTED.

>> I'M GOING TO -- STAFF, I WILL JUMP IN HERE ON THIS ONE.

STAFF DID NOT GIVE ME THE HEADS UP ON THE, YOU KNOW, I WOULD CALL A LET A ZONING VIOLATION , BECAUSE THEY HAVE NOT BEEN PROSECUTED YET ON THEM. WOULD THAT NOT BE PART OF THE MOTION OR RECOMMENDATION? THAT IS SOMETHING THAT HAS TO HAPPEN ANYWAY AS A STAGE ALONE FOR ZONING , YOU KNOW, ENFORCEMENT ISSUE. YOU KNOW, FOR PURPOSES, WE DON'T WITHHOLD ZONING AS A GENERAL RULE . YOU KNOW, LEFT THEIR VIOLATIONS, PARTICULARLY JUST POPPING IT UP , HAVING A TIME TO PROVIDE ENFORCEMENT ACTION , I DON'T RECOMMEND THAT BE PART OF, YOU KNOW, PROSECUTION, POTENTIAL PROSECUTION OR CRIMINAL VIOLATION TO BE PART OF AUGMENTATION FOR APPROVAL ON THIS. LET THAT STAND IN ITS OWN MERITS FOR REGULAR ZONING

ENFORCEMENT. >> OKAY. A PROPER MOTION WOULD

BE TO APPROVE AS PRESENTED? >> YES THERE.

>> IS THAT YOUR MOTIONS ARE? >> IS THERE.

[010 Conduct a public hearing and consider and act upon an ordinance relating to the use and development of 51.544± acres in the Coleman Jenkins Survey, Abstract No. 555 and the Joseph H. Witherspoon Survey, Abstract 1136, by changing the zoning from Agricultural (A) District and the Commercial (C) District to a Planned Development (PD) District for mixed use. The property is generally located on East Highway 287, east of Shady Grove Road. (Z51-2022-198) CONTINUANCE REQUESTED]

>> TO AVA SECOND? >> SECOND.

>> WE HAVE A MOTION IT IS SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR, THEY AYE?

C.A. 7 >> AYE.

>> AYE. >> IT IT MOVES. ITEM ZERO 10, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER AND ACT UPON AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE USE OF DEVELOPMENT OF 51.544+ ACRES IN THE COLEMAN JENKINS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 555, AND THE JOSEPH H WITHERSPOON SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1136, BY CHANGING THE ZONING FROM AGRICULTURE DISTRICT AND THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR MIXED-USE. THE PROPERTY IS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST HIGHWAY 287, EAST OF SHADY GROVE ROAD.

>> CHAIRMAN, THIS IS ALSO GOING TO BE REQUEST A CONTINUANCE TO NEXT MONTH. SO, THE PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING.

>> OKAY. I WOULD LIKE A MOTION TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING

UNTIL NEXT MEETING. >> MOTION.

[MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION]

>> SECOND. >> WE HAVE A MOTION ANY SECOND.

ALL IN FAVOR, THEY AYE? C.A. 7

>> AYE. >> AYE.

>> ANYONE OPPOSE? IT IS UNANIMOUS. OKAY, STAFF? DO YOU

HAVE ANYTHING? >> YES. I JUST WANTED TO SAY THANK YOU, AGAIN, TO LESLIE. I KNOW THAT YOU GUYS ARE USED TO SEEING HER TO THE SIDE. SHE IS A PART OF STAFF. SO, YOU WILL START SEEING HER A LOT MORE ON SOME OF THESE CASES. SO, I JUST WANTED TO SAY WE ARE PROUD OF HER, AND THANK YOU TO HER FOR

WHAT WE ARE DOING. >> WELCOME TO THE BOARD.

>> NICE JOB. >> ANYTHING ELSE?

>> THAT THEY SHOULD LET YOU TALK ALL THE TIME.

>> OKAY, COMMISSIONERS, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING? ANYBODY? I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ADJOURN?

>> I MAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN.

>> SECOND. >> ALL IN

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.