[Call to Order and Determination of Quorum.]
[00:00:19]
QUORUM. FIRST ITEM IS 001, CITIZENS TO BE HEARD. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION INVITES MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON ANY TOPIC NOT SCHEDULED FOR CONSIDERATION FOR ACTION ON THIS AGENDA, AND PRESENT TO THE CITY STAFF PRIOR TO THE MEETING. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT, THE COMMISSION CANNOT ACT ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA. WE DON'T HAVE ANY CITIZENS TO BE
[002 Staff review of the cases that were heard by City Council in the last sixty (60) days. ]
HEARD. OKAY. ITEM 2 HIS STAFF REVIEW OF THE CASES THAT WERE HEARD BY THE CITY COUNCIL IN THE LAST 60 DAYS.>> THERE WERE TWO CASES ON THE COUNCIL AGENDA FOR JANUARY 14TH. THE 711 AT VILLA ROAD AND HIGHWAY 287, -- WAS PRESERVED WAS APPROVED BY COUNCIL 7-0. PNC RECOMMENDED APPROVAL AT THE NOVEMBER 19TH PNZ MEETING . IN THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH FREESE AND NICHOLS FOR THE ORDINANCE REWRITE WAS APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL 7-0. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS ON THESE ITEMS? OKAY.
[CONSENT AGENDA]
>> THANK YOU. NEXT IS A CONSENT AGENDA. ITEMS 003, 004, 005, THEY CAN ALL BE TAKEN WITH ONE MOTION UNLESS THERE IS A MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION THAT WHICH IS TO PULL --
>> I NOTICED ONE THING ON THE MINUTES, IF WE PULL UP --
>> IMES STORY? >> I NOTICED ONE THING ON THE MINUTES, IF WE CAN PULL THAT UP.
>> OKAY. WE WILL PULL 003 AND CONSIDER 004 AND 005 ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. DO I HEAR A MOTION?
>> I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.
>> SECOND. >> HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND
[003 Consider the minutes for the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting dated: ]
TO IMPROVE CONSENT AGENDA, ITEM 004 AND 005. ALL IN FAVOR, AYE.>> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSED? UNANIMOUS.
WE'LL COME BACK TO 003, CONSIDER THE MINUTES FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATED DECEMBER THE
17TH. >> THE ONLY THING, I JUST NOTICED THAT MARK WAS HERE AND ABSENT AT THE SAME TIME. SO.
PROBABLY SOMEBODY NEEDS TO FIX ONE OF THOSE. HE'S VERY
SLIPPERY. >> OKAY. WOULD YOU LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION FOR CORRECTION OF THE MINUTES?
>> I THINK YOU, YOU WEREN'T HERE, RIGHT? OKAY. WE'LL SCRATCH OUT MR. HILL ON THE PRESENT, AND APPROVE THE REST.
>> OKAY. I'LL SECOND THAT. ANY DISCUSSION? NOW, ALL IN FAVOR,
[006 Conduct a public hearing and consider and act upon an ordinance amending the City of Midlothian Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map, as amended, by amending the regulations relating to the development and use of Lot 1, Block 1, McCowan Addition, located in PD149 by authorizing use of such property for Plastics and Rubber Product Manufacturing upon approval of a Specific Use Permit authorizing said property to be developed and used for Plastics and Rubber Product Manufacturing. The property is commonly known as 4521 N. US Highway 67. (Case No. Z33-2024-138) ]
>> ANY OPPOSED? IT'S UNANIMOUS. WE'LL MOVE NOW TO PUBLIC HEARINGS. 006, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER AND ACT UPON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN ZONING ORDINANCE AND ZONING MAP, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING THE REGULATIONS RELATING TO THE DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, MCALLEN ADDITION, LOCATED IN PD-149 BY AUTHORIZING USE OF SUCH A PROPERTY FOR PLASTIC AND RUBBER PRODUCT MANUFACTURING UPON APPROVAL OF A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT AUTHORIZING SAID PROPERTY TO BE DEVELOPED AND USED FOR PLASTICS AND RUBBER PRODUCT MANUFACTURING. THE PROPERTY IS COMMONLY KNOWN AS 4521 NORTH U.S. 67.
>> OKAY. COMMISSIONER, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, THIS IS AN AMENDMENT TO PD-149 TO ALLOW PLASTICS AND RUBBER MANUFACTURING ON LOT 1, BLOCK 1. IT'S 12 ACRES. IT DOES NOT ALLOW OUTSIDE STORAGE. IT'S ALREADY EXISTING, SO THE BUILDING IS THERE, AND I'LL JUST MAKE THIS BRIEF. SO THE FIRST PHASE, THEY ONLY BE USING A PORTION OF THE BUILDING THAT WENT INTO GO AHEAD AND ASK FOR, FOR THE ENTIRE LOT SO THAT THEY COULD EXPAND TO THE REST OF THE BUILDING EVENTUALLY. IT USES DOMESTIC WATER TO EXPAND AND FORM PRE-MANUFACTURED PLASTIC AND RUBBER PELLETS, AND IT PRODUCES NEGLIGIBLE, IF ANY, BYPRODUCTS, SUCH AS STEAM EXHAUST, ODOR. AND WE INCLUDED LANGUAGE IN THE PD ORDINANCE TO ADDRESS THE AIR-QUALITY. SO THE APPLICANT IS HERE. WE DID SEND LETTERS OUT TO ALL THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS, AND WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY FEEDBACK. SO STAFF
[00:05:02]
IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. >> QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
>> THE MATERIALS THAT THEY'RE MAKING, ARE THEY FLAMMABLE?
>> SO IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THEY'RE NOT. SO THEY'RE ACTUALLY NOT MANUFACTURING THE PLASTIC ON-SITE. IT'S PRE-MANUFACTURED, AND THEY'RE BRINGING IT IN TUBES AND THEN CUTTING THE TUBES AND FORMING THEM. SO THAT'S MY UNDERSTANDING, THAT IF YOU WANT TO HAVE MORE DETAIL ABOUT THE PROCESS, I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT YOU ASK THE APPLICANT.
>> OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY. >> I'LL GO AHEAD AND LET THE
APPLICANT SPEAK TO THAT. >> THE APPLICANT'S COMING UP.
JUST SO IT'S CLEAR, THERE'S ACTUALLY TWO THINGS HAPPENING WITH THIS ORDINANCE. ONE IS, WE'RE ACTUALLY ADDING THE USE TO BE ALLOWED WITH AN SUB TO THE ORDINANCE, BECAUSE PRESENTLY IT WILL BE PROHIBITED IN LI DISTRICTS, SO WE'RE ALLOWING IT. AND THEN CONCURRENTLY, WE'RE ALSO APPROVING THE SU P WITH THE CONDITIONS. SUGGEST, JUST SO
YOU'RE AWARE. >> ALL RIGHT -- AND WHETHER OR
NOT YOU LIVE IN THE CITY. >> MY NAME IS HUNTLEY LEWIS.
I'M NOT A RESIDENT OF THE CITY, BUT I DO REPRESENT THE
>> THE ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, YES, THERE ARE, THERE ARE PLASTICS, WHICH IS FLAMMABLE. BUT, YOU KNOW, THERE'S MACHINES CREATING THEM, AND ANY STORAGE RACKS OR ANYTHING WILL NEED TO BE, YOU KNOW, HANDLED AND STORED IN A WAY THAT MEETS THE FIRE CODE. AND THAT WILL ALL BE REVIEWED AND MADE SURE WE DO IT THE RIGHT WAY DURING THE BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS.
SO, BUT WE HAVE TO DO THIS BEFORE WE CAN, YOU KNOW, DISCUSS THE FULL BUILDOUT WITH THE CITY OFFICIALS.
>> DO YOU KNOW IF THE BUILDING CURRENTLY HAS A SPRINKLER
>> AND IS THERE ADDITIONAL FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS IN PLACE?
>> IT'S JUST A, IT'S AN EMPTY BOX RIGHT NOW. TO MY KNOWLEDGE, THESE, I DON'T THINK QUALIFIED FOR ANY ADDITIONAL FIRE SUPPRESSION, BUT THAT WILL ALL HAVE TO BE, YOU KNOW, CONFIRMED WITH THE FIRE MARSHAL, DEPENDING ON HOW THEY'RE GOING TO LAY STUFF OUT IN THESE STORAGE AREAS. BUT WE WILL COME UP WE WILL HANDLE IT APPROPRIATELY.
>> I'M SURE -- THE PROCESS. >> YES, SIR. THAT'S PART OF THE NORMAL BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS. ANY USE THAT REQUIRES IN AND ABOVE OR ABOVE FIRE CODE WILL BE MET, OR THEY WON'T GET
TO SEE THEM, SO. >> SO A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT. COULD YOU, OR THE COMMISSION, GIVE US JUST A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF WHAT YOU DO AND WHAT IT INVOLVES, AND WHAT
YOU WILL DO? >> YES. SO THIS IS FOR ONE OF THE TENANTS, AND IF YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH FRENCH STRAINING SYSTEMS, IT'S ESSENTIALLY WHAT THEY'RE PUTTING TOGETHER. AND SO THEY, YOU KNOW, ARE SHIPPED KIND OF SOME PERFORATED PLASTIC PIPE, AND THEN THEY ALSO SHIP KIND OF THESE TINY PELLETS THAT THEY RUN THROUGH A MACHINE THAT EXPOSES THEM TO STEAM, AND THAT STEAM EXPANDS THE PELLETS, AND THEN THEY KIND OF PUT THE PELLETS AROUND THE PERFORATED PIPE WITH A MESH, AND THAT KIND OF ACTS AS A FILTER FOR THE FRENCH DRAIN SYSTEM, IF THAT MAKES SENSE. SO THEY'RE KIND OF, IT'S KIND OF AN ASSEMBLY, BUT, YOU KNOW, WHEN WE TALK WITH STAFF, WE JUST WANTED TO, YOU KNOW, DOUBLE, DOUBLE CHECK EVERYTHING AND MAKE SURE THE
CITY'S OKAY WITH IT, SO. >> OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE
APPLICANT? >> I JUST HAVE A COUPLE QUESTIONS. SO YOU ARE, HE'LL BE RECEIVING MANUFACTURED
>> AND ALL THOSE PELLETS WILL BE STORED IN THE SIDE.
>> YES. >> ARE THEY IN BULK CONTAINERS
ON PALLETS? >> NO, THEY'RE IN KIND OF, YOU KNOW, IF YOU KIND OF THINK OF A, THEY'RE LIKE, LIKE A BREWERY TYPE THING, IT'S LIKE THAT KIND OF THING.
>> SO WILL THEY BE, WELL, WEALTHY, WHAT ARE THEY, THEY'RE, IT'S ALMOST LIKE A GRAIN.
>> IT'S LIKE A HOPPER. >> WILL THOSE GET FILLED ON-SITE ? DO THEY GET FILLED FROM INSIDE OF THE BUILDING, DO THEY GET FILLED FROM THE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING? ARE THE HOPPERS INSIDE THE BUILDING?
>> EVERYTHING'S INSIDE THE BUILDING, AND I THINK, YES, THEY WILL BE FILLED FROM INSIDE THE BUILDING. I AM NOT FAMILIAR WITH THEIR PROCESS FOR THAT, BUT EVERYTHING'S HAPPENING
INSIDE THE BUILDING. >> OKAY. SO THERE'S NO, NO RECYCLED MATERIALS COMING, AND THEY'RE NOT CREATING PLASTIC
>> JUST USING THE MANUFACTURED PLASTIC, PREMADE PELLETS TO PUT
[00:10:03]
TOGETHER THEIR FRENCH STRAINING SYSTEMS.>> YES. AND FROM, I, I SENT A VIDEO TO STAFF WHICH, YOU KNOW, SHE'S WELCOME TO SHARE, BUT IT SEEMS PRETTY EFFICIENT, JUST OF ALL THE MATERIALS THEY'RE USING.
>> OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? OKAY, THANK YOU,
>> OKAY, DO WE HAVE ANYBODY ELSE? DON'T HAVE ANY FORMS, THERE'S NO ONE ELSE TO SPEAK? I'LL MAKE A CASE TO ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> DO WE HAVE A MOTION IN A SECOND TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC
HEARING? ALL IN FAVOR, AYE. >>
>> AYE. >> N/A OPPOSED LIKE IT CLOSED.
>> MAKE A MOTION TO -- >> WE HAVE A MOGEN AND A SECOND TO APPROVE AS PRESENTED. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION OR
[007 The request is to conduct a public hearing to consider and act upon an ordinance amending the Development Site Plan and related regulations of Planned Development-57 (PD-57) for an addition to the existing building, being ±.158 acres of Lot 1, Block 28, Original Town, City of Midlothian, Ellis County, Texas., commonly known as 403 W Main St. (Case No. Z32-2024-133).]
QUESTIONS? NOW, ALL IN FAVOR, AYE.>> AYE. >> AND EO OPPOSED? IT IS UNANIMOUS. WE'LL MOVE TO ITEM 007. TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN AND RELATED REGULATIONS OF PLANT DEVELOPMENT-57 FOR AN ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING, BEING PLUS OR -.158 ACRES OF LOT 1, BLOCK 28, ORIGINAL TOWN, CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN, ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS, COMMONLY KNOWN AS 403
WEST MAIN. >> GOOD EVENING. SO FOR THIS REQUEST, THIS IS FOR I.V. PHOTOGRAPHY STUDIO. YOU MAY BE FAMILIAR WITH THAT HERE DOWNTOWN. SOME, SOME YEARS AGO, THEY DID GET A, APD APPROVED FOR THEIR PHOTOGRAPHY STUDIO BUSINESS, AND IN THIS REQUEST, THEY'RE ASKING TO AMEND THE PD. BUSINESS IS GOOD, THEY NEED TO DO A PHYSICAL EXPANSION, SO USE IS NOT CHANGING. STILL DOING THE SAME USE, SAME BUSINESS. WHAT THEY NEED IS MORE ROOM FOR SOME STORAGE AND STUDIO SPACE INSIDE. SO THEY ASKED US TO DO AN ADMISSION.
THIS HERE IN THE FRONT IS THEN KIND OF PHOTOSHOPPING IN PART OF THEIR ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION TO THEIR EXISTING BUILDING TO TRY TO GET SOME SENSE OF HOW MUCH MORE WOULD BE ADDED. AND THE , AND THIS IS AN ORIGINAL TOWN MODULE, SO, I MEAN, AGAIN, ZONING WISE, USE WISE, THIS IS ALL PRETTY CONSISTENT WITH OUR FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND WHAT THEY'VE BEEN DOING. AND THIS GIVES YOU THE OVERVIEW. THIS IS THE OVERVIEW, AGAIN, IF ANYONE WASN'T FAMILIAR WITH THE LOCATION.
THESE WERE THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. AS YOU CAN SEE, THEY GENERALLY ARE -- ORIGINAL ARCHITECTURE OF THE BUILDING.
THEY'RE NOT CREATING SOME NEW VERNACULAR OR CHANGE IN STYLE.
IT'S IN ADDITION AND KEEPING WITH THE ARCHITECTURE. AGAIN, A LITTLE BIT LARGER VERSION OF THE, OF, OF THE STRUCTURE, WITH THE ADDITION. THIS, USING FROM THEIR SITE PLAN, AND, SORRY, I DON'T THINK I HAVE A WAY TO -- OH, THERE WE GO. YOU CAN HOLD THE MOUSE CURSOR. SO THE BLUE HERE APPROXIMATES THE LOCATION OF ADDITION, OF THE ADDITION. I INCORRECTLY HAD THE SETBACKS -- IN THE REPORT ON THE ORDINANCE, I PUT THEM IN AT EIGHT FEET, AND THEY ACTUALLY NEED TO BE AT SEVEN FEET. AND THE SIDE HERE, SIX FEET TO THE NORTH. ALSO OF NOTE THAT HE WAS A 20 FOOT ALLEY, AND, AND IVEY PHOTOGRAPHY STUDIOS -- OWN THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH. SO JUST, IF YOU HAD A CONCERN ABOUT SETBACKS, JUST DO KNOW THAT THERE IS AN ALLEY HERE THAT'S 20 FEET, AND TO THE NORTH, THEY OWNED THAT PROPERTY. THE OTHER THING IS, AS A COMPARISON, AND WAS MENTIONED IN THE REPORT, DEPENDING ON WHICH ZONING DISTRICT YOU MIGHT COMPARE TO THAT MIGHT BE THOUGHT OF AS MORE AKIN TO ORIGINAL TOWN, WE WILL HAVE SETBACKS AT ZERO AND FIVE FEET FOR SIDE AND REAR. SO THERE HAS TO BE -- SIX AND SEVEN. SO STAFF DIDN'T TAKE ANY ISSUE WITH THAT REQUEST. AND WITH THAT, OH. WITH THAT,
[00:15:04]
FORGOT TO GIVE YOU THE RECOMMENDATION SLIDE. I'M SORRY. SO STAFF DOES, I'M HITTING TOO MANY BUTTONS. STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL, AND, I'M DISTRACTED. STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL. WE'VE MAILED OUT 15 PROPERTY OWNER NOTICES. WE HAVEN'T HEARD BACK FROM ANYBODY. APPLICANT WASN'T ABLE TO MAKE IT HERE TONIGHT, HAD A WORK CONFLICT. HE ASKED ME TO CONVEY, YES, HE'S IN SUPPORT OF THIS REQUEST. WITH THAT, I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.>> NO, MAN. NOT YET. >> OTHER QUESTIONS FROM STAFF? LET THE RECORD SHOW THE APPLICANT IS NOT PRESENT, AND DO WE HAVE ANYBODY ELSE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK? IF NOT, I'D ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO CLOSE. ALL IN FAVOR, AYE.
>> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSED? IT IS UNANIMOUS. -- DISCUSSION OR ACTION.
>> SECOND. >> WE HAVE A MOTION IN A SECOND TO MOVE APPROVED AS SUBMITTED. ALL IN FAVOR,
[MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION]
>> ANY OPPOSED? IT IS UNANIMOUS. OKAY. WE'LL MOVE TO MISCELLANEOUS. STAFF, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE?
>> I DO HAVE ONE THING. I JUST WANTED TO LET YOU ALL KNOW THAT RYAN WAS PROMOTED TO ASSISTANT DIRECTOR.
>> COMMISSIONERS, ANYBODY HAVE ANYTHING? OKAY. IF NOT, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ADJOURN.
>> I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN.
>> SECOND. >> HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND
TO ADJOURN. ALL IN FAVOR, AYE. >> AYE.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.