Apr 21, 2026 Planning and Zoning Commission

[Call to Order and Determination of Quorum.]

[00:00:08]

>> I CALL THIS MEETING TO ORDER. WE DO HAVE A QUORUM.

OUR FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS IS CITIZENS TO BE HEARD.

DO WE HAVE ANYBODY WHO SIGNED UP TO SPEAK THAT IS NOT SPEAKING ON A REGULAR ITEM ON THE AGENDA? ALL RIGHT.

[002 Staff review of the cases that were heard by City Council in the last thirty (30) days.]

STAFF REVIEW OF CASES. >> GOOD EVENING, MADAM CHAIR.

WHAT IS YOUR EXPERIENCE WITH THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF PLANNING?

>> WE DID HAVE THREE ITEMS ON MARCH 242026 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. THE FIRST ITEM WAS CRESTVIEW CUTIE IF YOU'LL RECALL. LOCATION OF U.S. HIGHWAY 67 SOUTHBOUND SERVICE ROAD AND MAIN STREET.

CITY COUNCIL DID DECIDE TO POSTPONE THAT ITEM TO NEXT TUESDAY'S MEETING. THE NEXT ITEM WAS A REZONING REQUEST FROM AGRICULTURE AP 110 AND SINGLE-FAMILY NUMBER 1 TO PLAN SINGLE DISTRICT 187 THAT HAS ALSO BEEN POSTPONED TO NEXT TUESDAY'S COUNCIL MEETING. THE THIRD ITEM ON THAT AGENDA WAS THE CREST POINT DEVELOPMENT THAT WAS THE REZONING REQUEST FOR SINGLE-FAMILY THREE TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR COMMUNITY RETAIL USES. THAT IS THE ONE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF WALNUT GROVE AND NORTH OF FM 1387. THAT IS ONE THAT STAFF RECOMMENDED. THEY DID MAKE SOME MODIFICATIONS TO THAT. AND THEY DOWN HIS OWN.

BASICALLY THEY DID ALL OF THE IDEA OF DOING THE GENERAL PROFESSIONAL USES ON THE PORTION OF THAT DEVELOPMENT THAT WAS CLOSEST TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. AND THEY DID REDUCE THE SIZE OF ONE OF THE STRUCTURES. AND THEY HAVE TO COME BACK WITH WHAT THEY ARE GOING TO DO FOR THE PHASE THREE, THE LATER PHASE COUNCIL APPROVED THAT 5-1. AT THE FOURTH ROUTINE CITY COUNCIL MEETING LAST WEEK AGAIN, ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED FOR THE 14TH BUT THEN POSTPONED UNTIL THE 28TH SO THAT IT WILL GO TO NEXT TUESDAY. SO 175 PD AN AMENDMENT THAT WAS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 513 SOUTH NINTH STREET WHERE THEY EXPANDED THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. CITY COUNCIL DID APPROVE IT WITH REVISED ELEVATIONS THAT THE APPLICANT SHOWED RENDERINGS OF SO THEY APPROVED THAT 6-0. THE SECOND ITEM WAS A MINTO PARK ADDITION PD DEVELOPMENT FOR 118 THAT WAS THE DETAILED SITE PLAN AND PD AMENDMENT FOR COOK CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CLINIC.

THAT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTH 14TH STREET AND SOLD FROM SERVICE ROAD.

AFTER MUCH DISCUSSION IT WAS APPROVED AT CITY COUNCIL WITH THE CONDITION THAT THEY EXPAND THE LANDSCAPING ALONG THE FRONTAGE AND THAT WAS APPROVED 4-2.

>> THANK YOU. ONE QUICK QUESTION ON 1387 WALNUT GROVE, THE DAY CARE, DID THE DAY CARE STATE THAT

DEVELOPMENT? >> YES.

[003 Review and Approval of Planning and Zoning Commission Bylaws Amendments]

>> THANK YOU. NEXT ON OUR AGENDA IS REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BYLAW AMENDMENTS. EVERYBODY HAD A CHANCE TO REVIEW

THOSE? >> THE REVISIONS WERE IN YOUR PACKET. JUST TO HIGHLIGHT THE CHANGES OF THE FOUR ITEMS THAT WERE BEING REQUESTED TO BE CHANGED BY CITY COUNCIL AND IT IS TO MOVE THE ELECTION OF YOUR CHAIR, THE VISE CHAIR, UNTIL A MATE TO FOLLOW THE COUNSEL CALENDAR OF ELECTIONS VERSUS THE ACTUAL CALENDAR YEAR.

THE SECOND CHANGE IS THAT CURRENTLY IT SAYS WE HAVE TO POST IT 72 BUSINESS HOURS. THAT WAS CHANGED WITH THE BYLAWS AND NOW REFLECTING THAT CHANGE AND STATE LAW REQUIRES IT TO BE POSTED TEN BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE. FIVE BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE.

[00:05:13]

THREE COMMISSIONERS, THE MAYOR'S, THREE COUNCIL MEMBERS IN WRITING PRIOR TO THE MEETING AND THEY CAN PLACE AN ITEM ON THE AGENDA. THEY DID CHANGE THE LANGUAGE OF THAT THE RULES CAN BE ALTERED. BUT IT HAS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL. AND THEN THERE WERE SEVERAL

MINER TEXT CHANGES THROUGHOUT. >> WERE YOU CHANGING ART TERMS

AS WELL? >> FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND.

>> THAT KNOW THE CHAIRMAN WILL STAY.

SO THIS IS TO ALIGN BETTER WITH THE COUNCIL ELECTIONS.

THIS YEAR WE HAD IT ON SEVERAL BOARDS.

ONLY GOING THROUGH MAY. THAT WAS JUST BECAUSE OF THE

CALENDAR FOR ONE INDIVIDUAL. >> THAT IS CONFUSING SO THEY

ONLY SERVE FOR FOUR MONTHS. >> ALONG THOSE LINES WOULD IT WOULD BE CHANGING THE LANGUAGE INSTEAD OF HAVING CAR JANUARY

AND MATE WITHIN 70 DAYS. >> THAT WOULD ALL BE BASED ON COUNCIL THIS IS TO ALIGN WITH THE COUNCIL.

>> OKAY. SHOULD WE HAVE SOME LANGUAGE IN HERE THAT SAYS IT IS SOME OTHER TIMES?

>> VACATED AT SOME OTHER TIME YOU GET THAT POINT AS WELL.

BUT IF IT IS VACATED AND MARCH YOU WOULD THEN REAPPOINT IN MAY.

>> OKAY, SO DO WE HAVE A MOTION. SO WE HAVE A SECOND WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. SO ALL IN FAVOR.

IT PASSES 5-0. IS THERE ANYTHING THAT NEEDS TO

[CONSENT AGENDA]

SO ON THE CONSENT AGENDA THIS MEETING ITEM ZERO ZERO FOUR CONSIDER THE MINUTES FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATED MARCH 17TH, 2026 CAN ZERO ZERO FIVE, CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A REQUEST FOR A FINAL PLAT OF REDDEN FARMS PHASE 2A WEST, BEING 9.860+ ACRES OUT OF THE BENJAMIN MONROE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 700 AND THE W.J. ELY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1333. THE PROPERTY IS GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF SOUTH ONWARD ROAD AND NORTH OF EAST US HIGHWAY 287. ITEM ZERO ZERO SIX, CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A REQUEST FOR A FINAL PLAT OF WESTSIDE PRESERVE PHASE 2, BEING 17.383+ ACRES OUT OF THE M.E.P & P.R.R CO. SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 761. THE PROPERTY IS GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF MILLER ROAD AND SOUTH OF WEST US HIGHWAY 287. DO WE HAVE A MOTION? DO WE HAVE A SECOND? WE HAVE A VOTE.

[007 Consider and act upon approval of a detailed development site plan, including building elevations and landscape plan, for 12.26+ acres in Planned Development District No. 171 (PD-171); and being a portion of that property known as Main Street Towne Crossing Phase II. The property is located on the north side of State Spur 73, and east of the intersection of US Highway 67 with US Highway 287. (SP02-2026-011)]

[00:10:01]

>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH COMMISSIONER AND COMMISSION.

THIS IS FOR APPROVAL OF A DETAILED SITE PLAN THAT IS ON THE CORNER OF A NEW ROAD ACCEPTED BY THE CITY PROBABLY ABOUT 12 MONTHS AGO. SEE, APPROVAL FOR 140,000 SQUARE FOOT LARGE-FORMAT STORE WITH RETAIL SALES WITHIN THE PLANT OF A LIMIT DISTRICT 171. PHASE TWO AND THEN FUTURE USE PLAN REGIONAL MODEL. THIS WILL BE A SINGLE TENANT WITH RETAIL SALES. THEY DO HAVE 498 PARKING SPACES, REGULAR WHICH ARE TEN BY 18. OVER 346 AND THEN 30% OF THOSE WILL BE FOUR BY 18 COMPACT. A WAY FROM THE RETAIL ANCHOR.

COMPLEX BASIS. SOUTHERN DRIVE OFF OF THIS DRIVE RIGHT HERE IT IS A SERVICE DRIVE CITY REQUIREMENT IS 132 FEET THIS IS 134 FEET. THAT GEOMETRY OF THIS IS TO PREVENT VEHICULAR TRAFFIC INTO THIS SITE AND THIS IS WHERE THE LOADING WILL BE IN THIS AREA. SO THAT IS FOR TRUCKS AND LOADING VEHICLES THROUGH THAT. SO THIS IS A LOCATION MAP.

FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION ON THESE AREAS IS REGIONAL MODEL. TO THE SOUTH AS NEWTOWN MODULE.

AND THEY ARE ZONING CLASSIFICATION AND THEN OF COURSE ON THE WEST AND SOUTH ARE 287 AND HIGHWAY 67.

SO THIS IS KIND OF A HISTORY OF THE REZONING.

THE AREA WAS ANNEXED IN 1987 IT WENT FROM AGRICULTURAL TO PD IN 87. AND THEN IT WENT TO SINGLE-FAMILY THREE IN 2017 AND THEN WENT TO A COMMUNITY FOR THE INITIAL PHASE OF THE SITE IN 2024 AND THEN THIS PD WAS AMENDED IN JANUARY OF THIS YEAR. MORE ADVANTAGES ON THE SIDE.

ONE OF THE NEW ROADS. MAIN STREET OR BUSINESS 287 TO THE NORTH. SO THIS DEVELOPMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THEIR FUTURE LAND USE PLANNER.

IT ENSURES SHORT AND LONG-TERM FINANCIAL STABILITY WITH FISCAL RESPONSIBLE POLICIES AND ACTIONS.

WE FOCUS ON MAKING THEIR AFFAIRS AS IMPORTANT ENTRIES INTO THE COMMUNITY AND THE IMPRESSION THEY LEAVE ON RESIDENTS AND VISITORS AND IT ALSO ATTRACTS AND RETAINS HIGH-PAYING EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES WITH HUMAN RESOURCES TALENT AND EXPERIENCE AND ALSO IT DIVERSIFIES EMPLOYMENT BASE TO PROMOTE SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THIS AREA.

THIS IS THE FRONT FACADE, FRONT AND REAR FACADE, EXCUSE ME, ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE HAVE WITHIN THE ORDINANCE OR WITHIN OUR BASE ZONING IS THAT NO HORIZONTAL WALL SHALL EXTEND FOR DISTANCE GREATER THEN THREE TIMES THE HEIGHT OF THE WALL.

WITHOUT CHANGING HEIGHT BY NOT LESS THAN 2 FEET WHICH HEIGHT CHANGE SHALL CONTINUE FOR DISTANCE OF NOT LESS THAN 4 FEET THIS DOES NOT COMPLETELY ADHERE TO IT THEY HAVE PROVIDED VISUAL INTEREST THEY HAVE PROVIDED ARTICULATION HORIZONTAL AND THROUGHOUT THE BARS. THESE ARE THE SIDE ELEVATIONS AND THEY ARE DOING THE SAME HERE YOU SEE THE LOADING SPOTS ON THE LEFT-HAND SIDE OF THE ELEVATION AND THEN THE BOTTOM ELEVATION WILL BE WHAT FACES HIGHWAY 60 -- 67.

>> THIS IS A LANDSCAPE PLAN THEY HAD ALL THE TREE ISLANDS AND THEN ALONG 73 THEY DO ADD QUITE A FEW TREES ALONG THAT TO BREAK UP THAT REAR FACADE. STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF

[00:15:04]

THE PD ORDINANCE ALLOWS THE FACADE TO BE IMPROVED WITH DETAILED SITE PLAN PROCESS AS THE PRECEDENT SET BY THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LOWS TO THE NORTH OF THIS.

WITH THAT I WILL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

AND I BELIEVE THEY CAN ANSWER SOME QUESTIONS AS WELL.

>> I'VE GOT A COUPLE. IS THERE ANY IMPEACHMENT TO MOVING THE MAIN DRIVE IN THE COMPLEX FURTHER NORTHWEST TO

CREATE THE 200-FOOT BOUNDARY? >> I WOULD SAY THAT WOULD BE VERY DIFFICULT BECAUSE THEN YOU HAVE THAT MAIN.

>> I KNOW WHAT COMES IN A STRAIT BUT IS THERE AN OPTION POSSIBLY

TO JOG IT? >> IT WOULD BE VERY DIFFICULT BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE MAIN DRIVE AREA RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE STORE SO IT WOULD BE SOMEWHAT CUMBERSOME FROM A TRAFFIC

STANDPOINT. >> AND DO WE HAVE A RENDERING OF

THE CANOPIES? >> THE APPLICANT MIGHT HAVE

THOSE I DO NOT. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS WITH STAFF? IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WOULD

LIKE TO PRESENT. >> IS IT ON HERE?

>> WHILE THE APPLICANT IS GETTING PREPARED I JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU, EVERYBODY, WHO IS IN THE AUDIENCE TONIGHT FOR BEING HERE IT IS USUALLY AN EMPTY ROOM SO WE LIKE SEEING ALL THESE FACES THIS IS NOT MY TYPICAL SEAT SO BEAR WITH ME THIS EVENING AS WE GET THROUGH THIS JUST TANK WITH US.

IF YOU ARE HERE YOU ARE SEEING IN FRONT OF YOU ON THE BIG-SCREEN WHAT IS GOING ON. SO YOU CAN GO BACK TO MIDLOTHIAN, TALKED, TELL TELL THEM ALL THE GOOD STUFF.

>> GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS, MY NAME IS JON, I AM THE DEVELOPER OF THE MAINSTREAM TOWN ACROSS ING HAPPY TO BE HERE WITH YOU THIS EVENING. HAVING A LITTLE BIT OF TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES ON OUR SITE HERE BUT WE WILL WORK OUR WAY THROUGH THAT. HERE BEFORE YOU TODAY TO HOPEFULLY BEGIN THIS PROCESS TO DEVELOPMENT -- DEVELOP THIS LARGE-FORMAT ANCHOR IT IS A WELL KNOWN RETAILER AND AT THIS POINT HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS WE HAVE WORKED WITH THIS RETAILER EXTENSIVELY OVER THE LAST SIX MONTHS TO TRY TO ADDRESS AS MANY QUESTIONS AS WE COULD HAVE FROM BOTH STAFF AND MEMBERS OF LETS SEE HERE. OH I HAVE.

OKAY I'LL HOLD ONTO THAT. EXCUSE ME.

THERE WE GO. SO WE HAVE WORKED HARD TO TRY TO ADDRESS SOME OF THE QUESTIONS WITH RESPECT TO THIS SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPING ELEVATIONS. ON ELEVATIONS WE HAVE WAY HAVE DONE A FOUR SIDED GREAT-LOOKING BUILDING.

EACH TIME ARTICULATION ADDED VARIATIONS ACTUALLY MATCHING THE BRICKS THAT ARE ON THE EXISTING BUILDINGS TODAY BOTH ON THE LOWS IN OUR RETAIL BUILDING, MATCHING THE COLORS THAT ARE ALSO ON OUR RETAIL BUILDINGS WE HAVE TRIED TO CREATE A GOOD LOOKING FOR SIDED BUILDING AND AGAIN WHEN WE STARTED THIS ENDEAVOR YEARS AGO FROM WHAT THIS WOULD LOOK LIKE IT WAS DESIGNED TO BE A GREAT-LOOKING BUILDING, ONE THAT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE EVERY OTHER ONE. SO WHAT WE HAVE ACCOMPLISHED HERE IS PROVIDING WHAT I WOULD CALL A MAIN STREET THIEM THESE

[00:20:08]

[LAUGHTER] THE WE TRIED TO CREATE SOME VERTICAL ARTICULATION IN FACT AS WELL WE HAVE MATCHED THE BRICK AND THAT IS HOW WE HAVE DONE IT. I WOULD DO MY BEST TO TRY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ON THAT ONE AS WE WORK THROUGH THIS AND FINALLY AS WE LOOK ON THE SITE PLAN WE HAVE LOOKED AT LOTS OF VARIATIONS WHILE WE DO TRY TO MINIMIZE ASKING FOR VARIANCE WE DO BELIEVE THIS TRUCK CONFIGURATION IS THE BEST THIS BUILDING HASN'T PROBABLY DROPPED DOWN ABOUT 70 FEET FROM SPUR 73 AND NICOLETTE CREEK AND THAT CORNER.

ARE RETAILERS DECIDED TO PUT A FULL WHILE AND THEY ARE TO SHIELD THE TRUCK. WE HAVE UPGRADED LANDSCAPING AND SO WE REALLY BELIEVE FOR CIRCULATION THAT IT IS PROBABLY BEST TO HAVE THE TRUCKS COME IN AT THAT LOCATION.

AND IF YOU KIND OF LOOK AT IT TO TRY TO DO IT ANY OTHER WAY PROBABLY MAKES THE SITE LOOK WORSE BUT IF THERE IS AN AWARD-WINNING SOLUTION I AM ALL EARS AND WOULD BE HAPPY TO HONOR IT. AT THAT POINT I WILL TRY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AND GO IN MORE DETAIL FROM THERE.

>> ANYBODY ELSE HAVE QUESTIONS FOR THIS START?

>> I KNOW YOU MATCH THE COLORS AND EVERYTHING BUT IT DOES NOT MATCH THE BUILDING PART OF YOUR DEVELOPMENT.

CAN YOU SORT OF ADDRESS IF THERE IS ANYTHING ELSE YOU CAN GET A

LITTLE BIT CLOSER ON? >> SO WHAT WE ATTEMPTED TO DO IS NOT ONLY MATCH COLORS BUT ON ALL FOUR SIDED BUILDING MATCH THE ELEVATED AND I THINK I DID SEE NOTE JUST THE ONE.

LET'S GO TO LET'S TRY THERE. WONDERFUL.

SO WHAT WE DID TRIED TO DO ON ALL THREE OF THESE SIDES, THE REAR AND THE TWO SIDES, WAS MIMIC WHAT WE WOULD CALL A MAIN STREET ELEVATION WHICH IS SOMEWHAT DEFINED BY A COLUMN WITH A FLAT ROOF AND A PROJECTED UPWARDS TOWER ELEMENT SUCH LIKE WE DID HERE AND THEN IF YOU NOTICE ON THE REAR OF THE BUILDING WE HAVE THREE MORE OF THOSE.

YOU WILL SEE THAT ON THE LOWES. THE FRONT IS A REALLY GOOD LOOKING BUILDING TO DO RUN INTO SOME CORPORATE DESIRES AND THAT IS WHAT WE HAVE DONE. AGAIN HAPPY TO VISIT FURTHER.

WE HAVE GONE THROUGH THREE ROUNDS WITH STAFF AND THE ARCHITECTS FOR THE RETAILER BUT AGAIN I AM HAPPY TO PROVIDE SUGGESTIONS AND TO TAKE AND PUT THROUGHOUT THE PROCESS.

>> ANYBODY ELSE? I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT TRAFFIC

FLOW. >> YES.

>> ON THE NICOLETTE CREEK AND I DO NOT KNOW CAN WE FLIP BACK OVER TO EITHER THE SITE PLAN OR THE LANDSCAPE PLAN?

THE SITE PLAN WAS FINE. >> OKAY SO WHERE WE HAVE THE HUNDRED 34 AND YOU'VE GOT THE AREA JUST TO THE LEFT FOR I'M GUESSING GROCERY PICKUP AND PLUMB LINE CORRIDORS SO THAT THEY WOULD BE SENT TO RINK AT THE MAIN INTEREST.

>> RIGHT NOW THE INTENTION IS FOR ANY TRUCKS TO COME IN ON THAT CURVED ENTRYWAY THAT IS WHY WE CREATED THE CIRCLE THAT IS THE TRUCK TURNING RADIUS AND SO THAT WOULD BE ALLOWING FOR COMPLETE AND FULL OF MOVEMENT. ONE OF THE THINGS IN THE RETAIL INDUSTRY IS TRUCK DRIVERS HAVE A MIND OF THEIR OWN AND WE WOULD BE NOWHERE WITHOUT THEM. AND THEY COULD CAN WE RESTRICT THEM FROM COMING AGAIN ON THAT MAIN ENTRANCE AND COMING ALL THE WAY AROUND KNOW THAT IS MORE HARD TO DO.

BUT I DO BELIEVE IF I WERE MAKING THAT DRIVE I WOULD COME

[00:25:01]

SO I THINK A PREPONDERANCE OF THE TRUCKS WILL COME THAT WAY.

>> THAT ANSWERS YOUR QUESTION. >> JUST LOCATE GOT IT IF I WAS DRIVING THE TRUCK AND I WAS PULLING BACK OUT THE INTENT FOR THIS DRIVEWAY IN QUESTION OR WHEN I'M GOING TO CALL THE OFFSIDE IS THE TRUCKS ARE GOING IN AND OUT OF THAT ENTRANCE,

CORRECT? >> THAT IS CORRECT.

>> AND THEN THE CONSUMERS WHO ARE IN THESE PARKING SPOTS FOR PRESSURE PICKUP IT IS WHERE WOULD THEY BE ENTERING AND

EXITING? >> LET'S SEE IF I CAN GET THE OKAY OKAY PERFECT. SO YOUR CUSTOMER WILL COME IN HERE THIS WAY AND THIS WAY. ANYBODY THAT IS USING THE ONLINE ORDERING PICKUP WOULD LIKELY MAKE A MOVE HERE AND WE CAN GO FROM THERE. FULL AND I WOULD SUGGEST THAT MOST PEOPLE ARE GOING TO BACK OUT AND GO THAT WAY.

IF THE QUESTION IS WE DO NOT WANT TO THESE PEOPLE COMING OUT THROUGH THE TRUCK ROUTE I THINK WE CAN DO THAT WITH SOME SIGNAGE AND WOULD BE HAPPY TO OFFER THAT.

I KNOW WHEN I VISIT THE RETAIL I DO NOT GENERALLY WANT TO DRIVE AROUND THE TRUCK AREA SO I KNOW HOW TO GO THAT WAY BUT CERTAINLY I BELIEVE SIGNAGE MIGHT ADDRESS YOUR QUESTION AND BE HAPPY TO DO SOMETHING THAT CERTAINLY GETS THE POINT ACROSS IN A NICE WAY.

>> OKAY. ANYTHING ELSE FOR THE APPLICANT.

>> THANK YOU. >> DO WE HAVE THE CONVERSATION?

>> I JUST HAVE A CONVERSATION FOR STAFF.

>> THERE IS ABOUT FIVE OR SIX PAGES THERE.

>> IN THIS PARTICULAR ORGAN -- ORDINANCE.

>> SPECIFICALLY IN THE ORDINANCE?

>> IN THIS PACKET. >> DO WE HAVE THAT TOO WILL?

>> THIS IS THE OLD ORDINANCE. >> WHAT IS THE PURPOSE?

>> IT IS TO REPRESENT THOSE BUILDINGS THAT I THINK ARE LESS THAN 20 SOUTH -- 20,000 SQUARE FEET.

OR BETWEEN 20 AND 30 SQUARE FEET >> WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THAT? WHAT IS THE REPRESENTATION THERE?

>> THAT IS REPRESENTING THAT LOWEST ORDINANCE OVER 50,000

SQUARE FEET. >> WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS BEING ON HERE? THIS IS THE EXISTING ORDINANCE.

SO WE HAVE THE BEGINNING OF THIS AND THEN PROBABLY I WOULD SAY I DON'T KNOW, ABOUT A THIRD OF THE WAY THROUGH WE PUT IN THE OLD

ORDINANCE. >> THE OLD ORDINANCE WAS THE

PURPOSE OF THE ENTIRE. >> WE AMENDED IT IN JANUARY I THINK ROUGHLY AND THIS WOULD BE THERE AS WELL.

>> THE AMENDMENT IN JANUARY CONTAINED THE RESEARCH.

>> WHAT RESTRICTIONS? >> AND EXHIBIT A.

>> IT ALSO REFERENCED THOSE BUILDINGS LARGER THAN 50,000

SQUARE FEET. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

>> DO WE HAVE A MOTION? WITH THE VARIANCES APPROVED OR DENIED? DO WE HAVE A SECOND? ALL RIGHT, HANDS IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION TO APPROVE AS PRESENTED WITH THE VARIANCES. THIS PASSES 5-0.

[015 Conduct a public hearing and consider a request for a Specific Use Permit for a water well on a 4.95-acre portion of the Benjamin C. Garvin Survey, Abstract No. 396, located at 1625 Misty Wood Drive. (SUP04-2026-021)]

>> THANK YOU. >> I AM GOING TO AT THIS TIME MOVE ITEM 15 ON THE AGENDA. MOVE IT FORWARD.

>> MADAM CHAIR. >> YES.

>> I JUST WANTED TO STATE WE DO NOT HAVE TO MOVE THE ITEM THE

APPLICANT DOES NOT PRESENT. >> OKAY, WE WILL GO AHEAD AND KNOCK IT OUT. IF THAT IS OKAY.

SO YOU WANT TO DO IT NOW OR AT THE END? OKAY. SO ITEM 15 IS

[00:30:05]

MISTY WOOD DRIVE. >> GOOD EVENING MADAM CHAIR, COMMISSIONERS, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, THIS ITEM IS A REQUEST FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A WATER WELL WITHIN A 4.9-ACRE PORTION OF A 42-POINT WHEN 85-ACRE LOT. THE WATER WELL IS TO PROVIDE A WATER SOURCE FOR THEIR PROPERTY AND THEIR HOME IS SERVED BY MIDLOTHIAN CITY WATER AND THE PRAIRIE LAND GROUNDWATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT HAS APPROVED THE PERMIT.

THIS IS SHOWING THE 4.95-ACRE TRACT THAT THE PORTION OF THE TRACT THAT WILL HAVE THE WATER WELL OF THE -- ON THE SITES HAS YOU CAN SEE IT IS QUITE A DISTANCE FROM THE RESIDENCE, THE EXISTING HOME, QUITE A DISTANCE FROM THE PROPERTY LINES SO THE WELL IT WILL NOT BE USED FOR ANY DOMESTIC WATER SIMPLY FOR THEIR CAPITAL. AND THEN WE DID SEND 30 POSTCARDS TO PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE PROPERTY AND ASSIGN HAS BEEN PLACED ON THE PROPERTY.

AND THE NOTICE OF THE APRIL 28TH 2026 CITY WAS PUBLISHED IN THE MIDLOTHIAN MIRROR AND WE HAVE RECEIVED NO CORRESPONDENCE FOR THIS PROJECT. AND STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE WATER WELL.

WE WILL STAND FOR QUESTIONS AND AS I MENTIONED THE APPLICANT

DOES NOT PRESENT. >> ANY QUESTION? DO WE HAVE A MOTION? APOLOGIES.

I'M GOING TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

WE DO NOT HAVE ANYBODY HERE TO SPEAK, RIGHT? AND NOBODY HAS SIGNED. DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING? UPVOTES? IF YOU APPROVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING? 5-0. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED.

DO WE HAVE A MOTION FOR MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS? SECOND? AND ALL IN FAVOR OF APPROVAL? 5-0. THE MOTION PASSES.

ALL RIGHT. ITEM NUMBER 8.

[008 Conduct a public hearing and consider a request for a Specific Use Permit for Group Home Use in an Agriculture (A) District relating to the use and development of Lot 5, Blue Grass Estates, located at 3220 Starwashed Drive. (SUP01-2026-003)]

CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR GROUP HOME USE IN AN AGRICULTURE (A) DISTRICT RELATING TO THE USE AND DEVELOPMENT OF LOT 5, BLUE GRASS ESTATES, LOCATED AT 3220

STARWASHED DRIVE. >> I AM MIRIAM SPENCER, AGAIN.

THIS ITEM IS A REQUEST FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A GROUP HOME USE AND AGRICULTURE DISTRICT.

THE PROPERTY IS 2.29 ACRES AND REGARDING OUR FUTURE MIDLOTHIAN 2024-2025 DESIGNATES THE RESIDENTIAL CITY MODULE WHICH IS COMPRISED OF RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBOR DEVELOPMENT IN A NEIGHBORHOOD SETTING. THIS IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW, THE SURROUNDING LAND USES AND A ZONING ARE ALL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONED AND ALL AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICT. AND TO THE NORTHEAST AND TO THE SOUTH YOU HAVE RESIDENTIAL LOW-DENSITY MODULE BUT TO THE WEST YOU DO HAVE COUNTRY MODULE. SO ON THE SITE PLAN APPLICANTS ARE PROPOSING TO HAVE EIGHT RESIDENTS IN A TYPED BEAT GROUP HOME AND THEY WILL HAVE TWO SUPERVISOR PERSONNEL AND THEY WILL BE PROVIDING 24-HOUR CARE FOR THE MENTALLY AND/OR PHYSICALLY IMPAIRED, AND I CONGREGATE LIVING FACILITY FOR THE ELDERLY. EXISTING STRUCTURE IS 230050 SQUARE FEET. IT IS AN EXISTING RESIDENTIAL HOME AND THE APPLICANTS ARE PROVIDING PARKING SPACES.

THEY ARE ASKING FOR VARIANCE TO DO A GARAGE CONVERSION ABOUT THE DESTRUCTION OF THE ATTACHED GARAGE.

THIS IS ELEVATION OF THE STRUCTURE.

[00:35:03]

AND THEY ARE REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO SECTION 3.56032 NOT REQUIRE A CONSTRUCTION OF A DETACHED GARAGE WITH THE CLOSURE OF AN EXISTING ONE-CAR GARAGE. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE VARIANCE REQUEST. FOR NEIGHBORHOOD CONSISTENCY WE FEEL THAT IF THEY DO ENCLOSE THE EXISTING GARAGE, THAT THEY NEED TO CONSTRUCT A DETACHED GARAGE. THIS PROPERTY WAS ANNEXED IN NOVEMBER OF 2008, IT WAS A ZONED AGRICULTURE, AND IT HAS EXISTED IN PLACE SINCE THEN. THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE FOLLOWING CONFERENCE OF PLANTER POLICIES.

ONE, FOSTER OBTAINABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FOR ALL RESIDENTS IN ALL STAGES OF LIFE, AND TO ENHANCE NEIGHBORHOODS FOR AGING IN PLACE. PROMOTE ATTRACTIVE AND SAFE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS OR FOR ALL RESIDENTS AND TO ENSURE THAT ADVERSE IMPACTS FROM USES PROPERTIES ARE INTERNALIZED AND DO NOT IMPACT NEARBY RESIDENTIAL AREAS.

AND TO ENCOURAGE A BALANCE OF LAND USES TO SERVE THE NEEDS OF RESIDENTS FOR ACCESSIBLE JOBS AND SERVICES.

WE DID SEND 13 POSTCARDS TO PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE SITE ON MARCH 27TH AND ONE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED ON THE PROPERTY. NOTICE OF THE APRIL 28-26 CITY COUNCIL WAS PUBLISHED IN THE MIDLOTHIAN CITY MIRROR AND WE RECEIVED THREE EMAILS IN OPPOSITION.

SORRY, AS I SPEAK, WHEAT RECEIVED ONE MORE.

SO THERE ARE FOUR EMAILS AND OPPOSITION WITHIN 200 FEET AND JUST PRIOR TO THE MEETING WE DID RECEIVE A PETITION OF OPPOSITION FOR THIS PROJECT. WE HAVE NOT HAD A CHANCE TO VERIFY THE SIGNATURES AT THIS TIME BUT WE WILL BE SUBMITTED GET TO THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE FOR VERIFICATION OF THE SIGNATURES AND INCLUSION IN THE CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATION FOR NEXT TUESDAY. BUT STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE GROUP HOME USE WITHIN AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AS DEFINED BY THE APPLICANT'S AS I MENTIONED EARLIER AS IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING LAND USES AND CONSISTENT WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO POLICY BUT WE DO NOT SUPPORT THE VARIANCE REQUEST TO ENCLOSE THE GARAGE WITHOUT PROVIDING A DETACHED GARAGE.

WE DO RECOMMEND IF THEY DO PROPOSE TO ENCLOSE THE GARAGE THEY WILL NEED TO REVISE THEIR SITE PLAN TO SHOW WHERE A DETACHED GARAGE WOULD GO. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.

>> ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF? >> I'VE GOT A COUPLE.

WHAT IS THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THIS HOUSE CURRENTLY?

>> 2353 SQUARE FEET. >> AND WE ARE ASSUMING THAT EIGHT ADULTS PLUS STAFF IS GOING TO FIT COMFORTABLY IN THIS?

>> THEY WILL HAVE TO MAKE MODIFICATIONS TO IT THE

APPLICANT IS CURRENTLY. >> AND NO UPGRADES TYPICALLY FOR THE FACILITY IS THIS SET ADEQUATE.

>> THEY WILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE BUILDING PERMITTING PROCESS FOR THAT. SO THEY MAY REQUIRE UPGRADES TO THEIR SYSTEMS AS WELL AS A PART OF THAT BECAUSE THEY WILL HAVE TO DO A FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM FIRST WHEN THEY GET APPROVED.

SO THERE WILL BE SOME SIGNIFICANT INTERIOR REMODELING.

>> PHILOSOPHICALLY WHICH... IMMEDIATELY.

[00:40:04]

>> HOSPITAL GUIDANCE TO THE CONFIDENCE PLAN EXPERIENCE.

>> SO JUST MR. COMMISSIONER ALTMAN, THE STATE OF TEXAS HAS LIMITED ABILITY TO RESTRICT, YOU KNOW, THEM TO PARTICULAR AREAS OF TOWN, AND THEY HAVE LIMITED THE THINGS THAT CITIES CAN AND CANNOT DO IN REGARDS TO THIS TYPE OF LAND-USE.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF? THE APPLICANT IS HERE.

>> CAN YOU PLEASE APPROACH. IF YOU WOULD PLEASE STATE YOUR

NAME. >> MIRANDA.

>> AND YOUR ADDRESS? >> MY HOME ADDRESS?

>> CITY. >> MIDLOTHIAN.

>> THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE QUESTIONS OF THE

APPLICANT. >> A QUESTION TO THE...

SHARED LINES. >> THERE IT WILL PRIVATE ROOMS AND SHARED ROOMS. BUT TEN PEOPLE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO FIT IN THE HOUSE IT WILL BE A CAREGIVER TO PENTAGON OCCUPANCY BUT I'M ASKING FOR A RESIDENT THAT I NEED THAT GARAGE SPACE BUT THERE ALSO WILL NOT BE LIKE TWO PEOPLE MOVING SO CAREGIVERS WILL COME, THERE WILL BE A SHIFT AT 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 7:00 P.M., TWO SHIFTS LIKE IN THE MORNING ORGANIZED AT ALL TIMES.

>> AND WHY DID YOU PICK THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION?

>> BECAUSE I INHERITED IT AND I WANT TO DO SOMETHING GOOD WITH

IT. >> DOES IT BOTHER YOU THAT THERE

IS HALF OF YOUR NEIGHBORS ARE... >> I'M NOT EXCITED ABOUT IT I'M NOT SUPER SURPRISED WHEN I MET WITH THE CITY THE ATTORNEY SAID THIS WOULD BE AN ISSUE YOU WOULD PUT OUT THAT BIG BLUE REZONING SIGN AND EVERYBODY WILL COME UP IN ARMS ESPECIALLY WHENEVER THE POSTCARD GOES OUT THAT SAYS GROUP HOME.

AND WHEN YOU HEAR GROUP HOME YOU KNOW IT HAS A NEGATIVE CONNOTATION THAT GOES WITH. SO THIS IS NOT A GROUP HOME WHERE PEOPLE ARE COMING OUT OF PRISON OR DOING ALCOHOL OR DRUGS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT THIS IS TO HELP THOSE ELDERLY INDIVIDUALS THAT NEED ASSISTANCE WITH ACTIVITIES LIKE DAILY LIVING SO THAT NEED HELP WITH BATHING, DRESSING, MEAL PREPARATION, LAUNDRY, EVERYTHING LIKE THAT, IT IS NOT NURSING CARE IT IS NOT A NURSING HOME, THERE IS NOT GOING TO BE ANOTHER'S CONCERNS OF LIKE EMERGENCY VEHICLES COMING AND GOING, IT IS NOT GOING TO YES, I MEAN I'M NOT GOING TO SAY THEY ARE NOT GOING TO COME BUT AGAIN IT IS NOT A NURSING HOME WHERE PEOPLE HAVE THESE HIGH, HIGH MEDICAL NEEDS. I THINK THERE IS OTHER CONCERNS THAT COULD DROP THE PROPERTY VALUE.

MAYBE IF YOU WERE THINKING THESE BIG-BOX FACILITIES THAT COULD BE AN ISSUE BUT NOT NORMALLY WITH THIS SMALL BOUTIQUE KIND IT DOESN'T CHANGE IT OR MIGHT HELP IT A LITTLE BIT.

BEGINNING TO PUT A BUNCH OF MONEY INTO THIS PROPERTY.

SO I JUST HOPE THAT PEOPLE CAN KIND OF LOOK AT IT IN A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE YOU KNOW WE ARE ALL GOING TO NEED THIS ONE DAY YOU WERE GOING TO BE AFFECTED BY IT IT IS NOT YOUR PARENTS OR YOUR NEIGHBOR OR SOMEONE YOU LOVE YOUR BODY OR MIND WOULD DO THAT FOR YOU EVENTUALLY.

>> WHAT IS THE OBJECTION FOR THE GARAGE?

>> SO THE GARAGE SO WE DO NOT REALLY NEED A GARAGE.

SO I WANT TO JUST ADD IT IS LIKE ANOTHER 528 SQUARE FEET SO I'M JUST TRYING TO ADD THAT SO THAT WAY WE CAN PUT TWO BEDROOMS AND THERE A LAUNDRY ROOM AND A STORAGE ROOM.

AND I'M FINE WITH KEEPING IT TO LOOK LIKE A GARAGE AND ALL OF THAT JUST OTHER THAN OF COURSE YOU KNOW MEETING THE CITY'S CODE I DO NOT HAVE A USE FOR A DETACHED GARAGE JUST ANOTHER STRUCTURE ON THE PROPERTY AS THEY PLAN IS NOW IF YOU WERE DRIVING BY THIS HOUSE YOU WILL NOT KNOW THIS IS A SMALL ASSISTED-LIVING FACILITY. THE HOUSE IS GOING TO CONTINUE TO LOOK THE SAME ONLY BETTER. THERE WILL NOT BE HUGE SIGNAGE THERE WILL NOT BE A CHANGE IN TRAFFIC THESE PEOPLE ARE NOT DRIVING THEY WANT OF CARS THEY WON'T BE PARKED OUT THERE I HOPE

[00:45:04]

DON'T EVEN KNOW. >> I THINK PART OF MY OBJECTION IS IN THE FUTURE IF THIS WAS TO SELL AS A RESIDENCE THERE WILL

NOT BE A GARAGE. >> CONVERTED BACK TO A GARAGE.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS TO THE APPLICANT.

OKAY, ANYTHING ELSE YOU WOULD LIKE TO SHARE WITH US? ALL RIGHT THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING SO AGAIN BEAR WITH ME WE HAVE QUITE A FEW FORMS HERE, WE WILL START WITH THE SPEAKERS.

THE FIRST ONE YOU ALL BEAR WITH ME ON A NAMES HERE.

THEN LUCKY. -- BEN.

4008? OKAY.

THEN JUST TOLD ON HERE FOR A SECOND.

ALL RIGHT, SHAWN TREMBLEY? THANK YOU.

COME ON UP AND IF YOU WILL STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, PLEASE.

>> MADAM CHAIR, COMMITTEE, I APPRECIATE YOU ALL HEARING THIS TONIGHT. MY NAME IS SHAWN A TRIBALLY.

I LIVE AT 180 BELMONT WHICH I BOUGHT HER A FENCE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THIS PROPERTY IN QUESTION.

CITY OFFICIAL MADE A POINT TO CALL IT WITH THE STATE OF TEXAS THAT IS MY ISSUE WITH THIS. IT IS APPROVED IT IS VERY BROAD I AM WORRIED ABOUT THE GUARD RAILS ON THIS.

I KNOW SHE SAYS THERE IS NO IMPACT BUT THEY HAVE YOU KNOW WHEN JERRY WAS ALIVE, THE RESIDENT, THEY HAVE BEEN THERE FOR A YEAR, A YEAR AND A HALF, AND THERE HAS BEEN NO IMPROVEMENT ON THAT PROPERTY. WHEN THAT PROPERTY IS SITTING IN DISARRAY AS WE SPEAK. SO I FIND IT REALLY HARD TO BELIEVE THAT JUST YOU KNOW THIS IS ALL APPROVED AND IT IS JUST GOING TO BE A NICE AND A LITTLE BIT OF YOU KNOW NO IMPACT TO THE COMMUNITY THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT SO THAT IS MY BIGGEST CONCERN. JUST BRINGING THE PROPERTY VALUE DOWN. AND I LOOK AT THE BACK OF THAT PROPERTY FROM MY PROPERTY AND YOU KNOW I JUST I WOULD REALLY APPRECIATE IT IF YOU GUYS WOULD VOTE AGAINST YOU KNOW.

>> HOW MANY ACRES DO YOU HAVE THERE?

>> TO .3. MY PARENTS BOUGHT IT AND 75 SO WE LIVE THERE ORIGINALLY MOVED FULL-TIME TO COLORADO IN 16 WHEN I PURCHASED PROPERTY OR SOMEBODY ELSE WILL PURCHASE.

SO I LOVE LIVING THERE I LOVE THE 2.3 GOT A COUPLE HORSES AND I ENJOYED THE PROPERTY. HAVE A COUPLE OF GRANDCHILDREN THAT COME OVER ON THE WEEKEND AND THERE WAS NOTHING PUT UP ON THE SCREEN ABOUT THE YOU KNOW THAT CONCERNS ME.

YOU KNOW WHAT KIND OF SUPERVISION IF SOMEBODY MENTALLY GETS OUT OF THE PROPERTY CAUSES SOME TROUBLE SO I JUST HAVE A FEW CONCERNS I DO NOT WANT THE CORONER DRIVING DOWN MY STREET EVERY WEEK. THAT KIND OF THING GOING ON SO THAT IS MY THOUGHTS ON IT. SO I WOULD APPRECIATE IF YOU GUYS WOULD VOTE AGAINST. THANK YOU.

>> OUR NEXT SPEAKER IS LISA JENNY.

>> AS A REMINDER YOU HAVE 3 MINUTES.

>> I LIVE AT 3221 STARWASHED. I'M DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE PROPOSED HOME MY WINDOWS FACE THAT HOME WE MOVED TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO RAISE OUR CHILDREN IN THE COUNTRY, WE MOVED FROM A LARGER VERY HAVE DICTATED CITY, WE SEARCHED FOR YEARS FIRST THAT THIS WOULD ALLOW US TO HAVE PEACE MY HUSBAND WORKS NIGHT SHIFT AND SLEEP SO DAY I WORK DAY SHIFT AND SLEEP ALL NIGHT. THE PEACE AND QUIET THAT COMMUNITY OFFERS OUR CHILDREN STAND AT THE END OF THE DRIVEWAY TO WAIT FOR THE BUS EVERY MORNING AND GET OFF AT BUS EVERY AFTERNOON. I HATE TO THINK THAT MY CHILDREN

[00:50:04]

I HAVE WORKED IN HOME CARE FOR YEARS PEOPLE CAN'T TAKE THEIR OWN MEDICATION PEOPLE NEED ASSISTANCE WITH BATHING THEY ARE

FREQUENT FLYERS. >> THAT WE CHOSE TO SEE IT COMMERCIALIZES PROPERTY THAT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE

COMMERCIALIZED. >> HOW MANY ACRES?

>> 2.3. >> YES, SIR.

HE IS SWINGING IN THE FRONT YARD AND IN THE BACKYARD.

>> I WANTED TO POINT OUT A COUPLE THINGS THAT HOUSE HAS NOT REALLY BEEN CARED FOR SINCE THEY HAVE TAKEN OVER THE PROPERTY.

THEY LEFT COMPLETELY. WITH NOBODY THEY ARE WATCHING IT DURING THE NIGHT. CHECKING ON THE FIRE AT A NIGHT IT IS JUST THEY HAVE NOT DEMONSTRATED RESPONSIBILITY AS CAREGIVERS TO THEIR PROPERTY TO WHERE I WOULD TRUST THEM TO CARE FOR EIGHT ELDERS. INSURANCE MONEY GRAB.

>> THIS IS WHAT THEY WOULD COME UP WITH.

>> OUR NEXT SPEAKER IS BRANDY BUTLER.

>> WE'RE I LIVE. >> YOU NAME YOUR ADDRESS AS A

REMINDER. >> I LIVE AT 32-30 -- 3230 STARWASHED DRIVE OUR PROPERTIES TOUCH AND I AM ALSO OPPOSED I DO HAVE QUESTIONS THOUGH BECAUSE EVERYTHING I KEEP WEEDING SAYS MORE THAN LIKELY IT WILL GET APPROVED SO MY QUESTIONS ARE ONCE THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS APPROVED, ARE THEY ABLE TO CHANGE WHAT TYPE OF USE IT IS FOR? MEANING GET A GHOST FROM ASSISTED-LIVING TO...

OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT DOES SHE NEED TO COME BACK.

>> YOU CAN ASK QUESTIONS WE CANNOT ANSWER YOU.

SO IF YOU WANT TO PUT YOUR QUESTIONS INTO THE RECORD WE JUST CANNOT TRANCE -- ASK YOU DURING PUBLIC HEARING.

>> THAT DEFINITELY IS A CONCERN OF MINE.

AND THEN I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW HOW THESE EIGHT RESIDENTS WILL BE ACCOMMODATED SAFELY AND COMFORTABLY.

TO MY KNOWLEDGE OF THAT HOUSE IS NOT 2353 SQUARE FOOT I'M NOT REALLY SURE BECAUSE WHEN I LOOKED IT UP IT WAS 1300 AND SOME CHANGE SO I'M NOT SURE IF THEY ARE INCLUDING THE OUTDOOR SPACE OR IF THAT IS INCLUDING WITH THE CLOSED I GUESS NOT THE ENCLOSED GARAGE BUT AS FAR AS I UNDERSTAND UNDERSTAND IT IS A THREE BEDROOM HOUSE RIGHT NOW. AND I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF THEY IT WOULD BE LIKE ANY DEDICATED QUIET HOURS, OR A DEDICATED OUTSIDE TIME FOR THESE INDIVIDUALS BECAUSE THIS IS A VERY QUIET NEIGHBORHOOD AND ONE OF THE REASONS WE MOVED HERE AS WELL. WE ARE NOT ON TOP OF EACH OTHER NECESSARILY BUT WE CAN STILL SEE NEIGHBORS, WE CAN STILL HEAR THINGS. WHICH BRINGS ME TO MY NEXT QUESTION. IF THERE IS ANY FENCING OR BUFFERING PLANNED. I AM CONCERNED FOR THESE INDIVIDUALS TO HAPPEN TO WANDER ONTO MY PROPERTY AND THEN IF SOMETHING HAPPENS IN MY LIABLE FOR THAT BECAUSE I'M NOT REALLY SURE HOW THIS WORKS BECAUSE I'VE NEVER HAD TO DEAL WITH THIS BEFORE. PARKING PLANS, IF THIS DOES GET APPROVED I WOULD LIKE TO FOR YOU GUYS TO RESTRICT THAT THERE IS NO STREET PARKING NOBODY PARKS ON THE STREET CURRENTLY BECAUSE WE ALL HAVE PROPERTY. AND THERE IS REALLY NOT A LOT OF ROOM TO PARK ON THE STREET, BUT WITH THE INFLUX OF EVERYTHING EVERYBODY ELSE MENTIONED STAFF VISITORS AND ALL OF THAT THAT

[00:55:01]

CONTINUOUS APPLIANCE USAGE. >> I WILL ASK YOU TO WRAP IT UP.

>> I'M SORRY I JUST HAVE A LOT. SO I ALSO AM OPPOSED TO THIS.

>> HOW MANY... >> .1.

>> HOW LONG? >> JULY WILL BE FIVE YEARS.

>> SEPTIC. >> AS FAR AS I UNDERSTAND THAT IS ORIGINAL SEPTIC WE HAVE NO FURTHER USE FOR THOSE ANYMORE.

>> I BELIEVE THOSE ARE ALL OF OUR SPEAKERS.

I DO HAVE THREE FORMS, OKAY. AND OPPOSITION LEO VON, AND OPPOSITION BILLY K VAL, AND IN OPPOSITION SUE MCALLISTER.

DID I MISS ANYBODY. SORRY, YES.

OKAY. WHAT WAS HER NAME.

>> MADAM CHAIR I THINK THAT FORM MAY HAVE COME IN AFTER 5:00

TODAY SO WOULD YOU LIKE TO HERE. >> WOULD YOU LIKE TO BECOME A SPEAKER? IS THAT OKAY? PLEASE APPROACH. IF YOU WILL STATE YOUR NAME AND

ADDRESS, PLEASE. >> I THANK YOU FOR THAT I APPRECIATE THAT. BUT MARCY MOORMAN, I AM AT 3080 STARWASHED AND I'VE BEEN THERE SINCE ABOUT 2018.

NOT GO TO TOUCH ON EVERYTHING THAT IS TO GO TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, THE LIFESTYLE, I DO FIND IT HARD TO SEE HOW A REZONING OF THE SORT WOULD BE COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING LAND USES JUST BECAUSE THERE IS NO SURROUNDING LAND USE TO THIS HOME THAT IS SIMILAR AT THE FACILITY.

BUT I DO WANT TO TOUCH ON THE REZONING MAINLY AROUND HOW THEY FIT AND FUNCTION OF THAT HOUSE WILL BE 48 ELDERLY PATIENTS LIVING IN. -- WELL BE FOUR EIGHT ELDERLY PATIENTS LIVING IN. MY HOUSE IS THE EXACT SAME FOOTPRINT OF THAT HOUSE. RIGIDLY THREE BEDROOMS, TWO BATHS, A LIVING AREA WHICH IS KITCHEN AND IT HAS THE GARAGE.

HALF A BATH AND EXTRA SPACE. WITH THAT I HAVE AROUND 2035 SQUARE FEET. WITH OUT IT IS AROUND WHAT

HAPPENED AS MENTIONED. >> A COUPLE BACK INJURY.

>> AND IT IS TIGHT I MEAN WE ARE NOT HAPPY WITH THE HALLWAYS NEXT TO EACH OTHER. WITHOUT GOING SIDEWAYS.

THE ROOMS ARE SMALL. SO WHAT I WAS HOPING CARE TONIGHT AS I WAS HOPING TO HEAR THE EXPANSION ON THE HOME TO

ACCOMMODATE THE INDIVIDUALS. >> THAT TO ME IS CONCERNING.

>> IT CATERED EIGHT ELDERLY RESIDENTS.

EVACUATION AND MOVEMENT AND SAFETY.

>> BEYOND ALL THE OTHER OBJECTIONS JUST QUIET COMFORTABLE NEIGHBORHOOD WITH THE NEIGHBOR OPERATES NOW HOW WE OPERATE. FORM AND FUNCTION AND

[01:00:01]

AS IT STANDS I DON'T THINK ANYBODY WOULD WALK IT AND SAY ALL OF YOU HAVE TO LISTEN. AND DID A SMALL FOR ME AND I AM A SINGLE PERSON SO THAT IS A THANK YOU.

>> ONE MORE QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT RIGHT NOW.

>> CAN YOU TELL ME THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TYPE A AND

TYPE B REMOTE? >> TAPE B IS WHEN YOU HAVE RESIDENCE THAT REQUIRE ASSISTANCE.

>> SO THESE ARE NOT INDEPENDENT LIVING.

>> CAREGIVER OVERNIGHT. >> GET ASSISTANCE WITH THE

HOUSE. >> ASSISTED-LIVING NOT MEDICAL

CARE. >> SMALL RESIDENTIAL OR LIVING BUT THERE IS NOT RESIDENTIAL OR NURSING CARE.

>> IF YOU HAVE LET'S SAY THEY HAVE A SEVERE WOUND OR SOMETHING THEY WOULD HAVE TO COME IN. THEY WOULD HAVE TO GO THERE.

NO NURSING CARE. >> MAKES THE SIDES OF THE HOUSE.

>> THERE IS A SUNROOM THAT IS ON THE HOUSE SO THAT SPACE IS BEING USED AS WELL THE CONDITIONING AND EVERYTHING IS TIED INTO IT SO MAYBE THEY ARE NOT CONSIDERING THAT SPACE.

GOES ALL THE WAY AROUND. >> ALL THESE CONCERNS.

>> THERE IS INSPECTIONS THIS MEANS EVERYTHING NOT JUST LIKE I WILL SHOVE EIGHT PEOPLE IN THEIR AND PASSING 48 BECAUSE THAT WOULD BE OFF THERE COULD BE FOUR OF THEM BUT AGAIN THIS WILL BE LICENSED THROUGH TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES.

>> DO YOU HAVE LIFE SAFETY CODE TO FOLLOW WITH THE FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS MONITORED 24/7 FIRE ALARMS? THIS IS NOT JUST LIKE HOW IT IS BEING PRESENTED BY SOME OF THE NEIGHBORS. I UNDERSTAND IT IS A QUIET NEIGHBORHOOD -- QUIET NEIGHBORHOOD I LOVE HIS NEIGHBOR AND I'VE BEEN COMING TO IT SINCE I WAS FIVE YEARS OLD.

WHICH IS WHY I'M NOT TELLING THIS HOUSE BECAUSE IT IS SPECIAL TO ME. THE ALTERNATIVE IS TO HAVE RUNNERS BEING CHANGED OUT EVERY YEAR.

AND EVERYBODY HAS MY EMAIL WITH THE FOLLOWING THROUGH THAT THEY COULD ADDRESS THOSE. YES, SIR.

>> NOT AT THIS MOMENT IN TIME MAY BE DOWN THE LINE BUT NOT

RIGHT NOW. >> ANY OBJECTION TO EITHER LIMITING OR RESTRICTING PARKING ON THE STREET.

>> THE DRIVEWAY IS VERY LONG. >> LIKE ON THE SITE PLAN THERE IS FOR SPACES THERE. NOT ANYBODY WHO BARKS ON THE

STREET THERE. >> DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE

THE PUBLIC HEARING. >> ALL IN FAVOR OF CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED.

DO WE HAVE ANY DISCUSSION? >> WE HAVE RULERS.

>> 5-ACRE LOTS AND 2-ACRE LOTS. >> AND WHEN WE ALLOW A DUPLEX ON ONE OF THESE PROPERTIES WERE SPLIT THESE PROPERTIES OTHER THAN A MOTHER-IN-LAW WE ARE VIOLATING OUR OBLIGATION WITH

[01:05:03]

WANT TO KEEP HORSES AND ANIMALS AND EVERYTHING THAT YOU LEVELED

AGAINST THE. >> DO WE HAVE A MOTION?

>> DO WE HAVE A SECOND. >> WE HAVE A MOTION AND SECONDED

AND I ASKED PRESENTED. >> OUR NEXT AGENDA ITEM IS ZERO

[009 Conduct a public hearing and consider a request for a Specific Use Permit for a Group Home Use in a Residential Three (R3) District relating to the use and development of a 2.52+ acre portion of the Robert Horton Survey, Abstract No. 508, located at 611 N. 4th Street. (SUP03-2026-020)]

FOURTH STREET. >> THANK YOU, MADAME CHAIR.

THIS IS A REQUEST TO ALLOW GROUP HOME USE AND ARE THREE ZONING ON A 2.52 LOT. THE REQUEST IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AS IT IS NOT COMMERCIAL, ENTERTAINING, OR COMMUNITY FACILITY WHICH ARE THE PROMOTED NONRESIDENTIAL USES IN THIS MODULE. THE SLIDE SHOWS THE PROPERTY OUTLINED IN YELLOW AND THE ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USES AND FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS IN THE BOTTOM LEFT TABLE.

THE PROPOSED USE IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING SINGLE FAMILY VALUES. HERE IS THE SITE PLAN FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE KNOW WHEN YOU ARE LOOKING AT THIS THE EASTERN BOUNDARY WILL BE THE SIDE FACING THE GROUP HOME WILL ACCOMMODATE 16 RESIDENTS, THREE SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL, IN 24-HOUR CARE FOR THE MENTALLY AND PHYSICALLY IMPAIRED AT THE FACILITY WILL BE 9437 SQUARE FEET WITH 25 PARKING SPACES THEY USE VARIATION IS NEEDED TO TAILOR THE DEFINITION TO ALLOW 16 RESIDENTS WHICH IS THE MAXIMUM CAPACITY OF TYPE B ASSISTED-LIVING FACILITY ACCORDING TO THE TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION. THE APPLICANT HAS CURRENTLY MET THE KOTA PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR ASSISTED-LIVING WHICH IS ONE SPACE FOR EACH OF 400 SQUARE FEET OF AREA BUT SAID THE REQUIREMENT IS ONE SPACE FOR EACH OF THE FOUR RESIDENCES.

>> PLAN TO REDUCE THE PARKING TO NINE SPACES AND CREATE MORE

GREEN SPACE. >> HERE IS A PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS FOR THE FACILITY WHICH REQUIRE NO VARIANCES.

THE APPLICANT HAS WORKED WITH STAFF TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING. THIS INCLUDES LANDSCAPE BUFFER AND FULL OF OPAQUE SCREENING ACROSS THE WESTERN BOUNDARY AND ATE ADDITIONAL PARKING, EXCUSE ME ATE ADDITIONAL TREES ALONG THE FRONTAGE. THE PROPERTY WAS ANNEXED IN 1930 AND WITH IT THREE INITIAL ZONING IN 1989.

STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST PARTIALLY CONSISTED WITH THE CITED COMPREHENSIVE POLICIES. IT IS PARTIALLY CONSISTENT WITH THE AGENT COULD PLACE POLICIES BECAUSE THE PROPOSED GROUP HOME WOULD SERVE ELDERLY RESIDENTS AND PROVIDE SUPPORTIVE CARE IT IS ALSO PARTIALLY CONSISTENT WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD PROTECTION POLICIES BECAUSE THE APPLICANT ADDED BUFFERING, SCREENING, AND ADDITIONAL TREATIES TO IMPROVE THE TRANSITION TO NEARBY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. IT IS PARTIALLY CONSISTENT AS WELL WITH SERVICE AND EMPLOYMENT POLICY.

THIS WOULD PROVIDE OUR CARE RELATED SERVICE WITH ON-SITE STAFF. PUBLIC NOTICES WERE MAILED OUT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN A 200-FOOT RADIUS OF THE PROPERTY.

ASSIGN HAS BEEN PLACED IN THE PROPERTY AS WELL AS NOTICE OF THE COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING PUBLISHED IN THE CITY NEWSPAPER FOR COMPLIANCE WITH TEXAS LAW. STAFF RECEIVED NO OPPOSITION SO THE ITEM STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL OF THE REQUESTED TO FUTURE LAND

[01:10:04]

DOES WANT TO KNOW THE APPLICANT DOES HAVE ROUTES TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING AND TRADITIONAL DESIGN FOR ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL USES THANK YOU AND I AM OPEN TO QUESTIONS AND THE APPLICANT DOES NOT PRESENT TODAY.

>> ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF.

>> I HAVE ONE QUICK QUESTION. THERE HAS BEEN A NUMBER OF CUP'S -- SUP OFFERED TONIGHT TO SUCH TRANSFER WITH THE PROPERTY?

>> THAT IS CORRECT IF IT IS NOT EXPIRED.

>> JUST ONE POINT OF CLARIFICATION IT DOES NOT GO AWAY AS LONG AS THE USE CONTINUES LIKE MOST OF OUR SPECIFIC USE PERMIT ORDINANCES THERE IS A TERMINATION OF THE ORDINANCE ITSELF IF FOR A PERIOD OF TIME, USUALLY 18 MONTHS, THAT THE USE IS DISCONTINUED, SO IT WOULD GO ONE OF THOSE

CIRCUMSTANCES. >> UNDERSTOOD.

>> BUT FROM ONE MEMBER TO THE NEXT AS LONG AS YOU CONTINUE.

>> FOR MY PROPERTY OWNER VIEW WISH TO TRANSFER IF THE USAGE

WAS AUTOMATIC THANK YOU. >> CURRENTLY HOUSED ON THE

PROPERTY. >> IT IS THE HOUSE YOU CAN SEE IT ON GOOGLE IMAGES AND THAT IS CURRENTLY DEMOLISHED.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF? >> IS THERE ANY CONCERN WITH THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ON FORD STREET? TALKING TO THE EMERGENCY

RESIDENTS, VISITORS. >> THERE IS NONE.

>> ALL RIGHT THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

ALTHOUGH I DO NOT HAVE ANYBODY SIGNED UP TO SPEAK.

AND IS THE APPLICANT HERE? WE HAVE NO APPLICANT WE HAVE NO PEOPLE TO SPEAK. WOULD ANYBODY LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING? WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND ALL IN FAVOR OF CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING 5-0. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED.

DO WE HAVE ANY DISCUSSION? DO WE HAVE ANY MOTION.

>> MAKE A MOTION TO DENY DO WE HAVE A SECOND? WE HAVE A MOTION OF SECOND TO DENY AS RECOMMENDED.

VOTE? I AM NOT DENYING SO THAT PASSES

[010 Conduct a public hearing and consider a request for a Specific Use Permit for Group Home Use in Planned Development District No. 77 (PD-77) relating to the use and development of Lot 7, Block C, Four Trees Addition, located at 4261 Morninglory Parkway. (SUP02- 2026-019)]

RELATING TO THE USE AND DEVELOPMENT OF BLOCK SEE LOCATED AT 4261. MORNING GLORY PARKWAY.

>> ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AGAIN, THIS IS ALSO A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW GROUP HOME USE AND FIND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 77, THIS SITE IS A 1 ACRE AND GUIDING OUR FUTURE MIDLOTHIAN LAKE 45 FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT IS CONTRARY MODULE WHICH IS COMPRISED OF LOW DENSITY AT AN AGRICULTURAL LEVEL. THIS IS SURROUNDING LAND USES AND A ZONING IT IS ALL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND ALL COUNTRY AND SO THIS PARTICULAR GROUP HOME IS REQUESTING 12 RESIDENTS WITH THREE SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL, ALSO OFFERING 24-HOUR CARE FOR THE MENTALLY AND/OR PHYSICALLY IMPAIRED AND CONGREGATE LIVING FACILITY FOR THE ELDERLY.

AND THERE'S ALMOST IS 3300 SQUARE FEET.

FOR PRESIDENTIAL ELEVATION SHOWING.

[01:15:06]

THIS WAS ANNEXED INTO THE CITY AND MARCH OF 2000 AND IT HAS BEEN REZONED TO PD TWO TIMES THE FIRST ONE WAS IN MARCH OF 2000 THE SECOND AND THE CURRENT WAS APRIL OF 2015 AND THE PROPOSED SPECIFIC USE PERMIT IS -- IS CONSISTENT WITH THE FOLLOWING COMPREHENSIVE LAND POLICIES AGAIN TO FOSTER OBTAINABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS FOR RESIDENTS IN ALL STAGES OF LIFE AND TO ENHANCE NEIGHBORHOODS FOR AGING IN PLACE, PROMOTE ATTRACTIVE AND SAFE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS FOR ALL RESIDENTS INCLUDING ENSURING THAT ADVERSE EFFECTS FROM ADJACENT USAGE AND PROPERTIES ARE INTERNALIZED AND DO NOT IMPACT THE RESIDENTIAL AREAS AND PROVIDE INCREASED OPPORTUNITIES FOR MIDLOTHIAN RESIDENTS TO WORK WITHIN THE CITY 14 POSTCARDS WERE MAILED TO PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE SIDE ON MARCH 27TH, ONE SIGN WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AND A NOTICE THE MAY 12TH 2026 CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE PUBLISHED ON APRIL 25TH 2026 AND WE RECEIVED ONE EMAIL WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE PROPERTY.

FIVE EMAILS OUTSIDE OF 200 FEET OF THE PROPERTY BUT ALL THE EMAILS HAVE COME WITHIN THE P77 AND STAFF RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A GROUP HOME WITHIN THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 77 SO IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING USES AND CONSISTENT WITH THE PLANNED POLICIES.

BECAUSE ON THIS ONE THEY ARE NOT POSTING ANY CHANGES TO THE HELMET AND THIS ONE. AND THE APPLICANTS ARE.

>> DO YOU OPPOSE? >> EXCUSE ME WHAT?

>> OPPOSE? >> YES.

>> WHAT IS THE BREAKDOWN OF BEDROOM AND BATHROOM'S.

IF THEY ARE NOT MAKING ANY ADJUSTMENTS TO THE HOUSE WHAT IS

>> I WOULD LET THEM SPEAK. >> IS THIS COMPATIBLE WITH THE

HOA? >> WE DO NOT ENFORCE THE HOA.

>> I AM ASSUMING THIS IS ON SEPARATE.

>> YES. >> OKAY.

>> IF THE APPLICANT IS HERE IF THEY WOULD PLEASE COME FORWARD WONDERFUL. IF YOU WILL MAKE SURE AND SPEAK

INTO THE MICROPHONE THANK YOU. >> FIRST OFF THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME HERE TODAY. I SEE SOME FACES AROUND HERE I APOLOGIZE I DID NOT GIVE ANY NOTICE ABOUT THE GROUP HOMES AS THEY DO BUT REALLY JUST FOR ASSISTED LIVING AND REALLY NOT MY DECISION IF I WANTED TO BUT ARE NOT BUT I'M TAKING CARE OF MY MOTHER-IN-LAW RIGHT NOW AND SEE THIS ALL THE TIME AND WE KNOW HOW TO RUN IT WE KNOW WE WENT FOR WE KNOW HOW TO KEEP PLAYING DID NOT GO IN THE WORLD BUT THAT IS WHAT THAT IS WHAT I WAS THINKING ABOUT FOUR BUT I DO NOT TO -- I DO NOT WANT TO ROUGH NO RUBBERS THIS IS A DISTRACTION TO YOU ALL AND TAKING CARE OF ELDERLY THAT EVERY ONE OF US TO TAKE ONE OUT FIRST YOU KNOW HONESTLY WHAT I'M GOING TO CONTINUE WHAT I'M DOING WITH MY PASSION AND THAT IS WHAT I PUT ON MY HEART THAT IS WHAT I WILL CONTINUE TO DO SO I WAS GOING TO TRY THERE AND SEE IF I ACTUALLY WANTED TO EXPAND THIS AND I'M NOT GONNA NEED 12 PEOPLE.

AS FAR AS THE BEDROOMS GO IT IS MORE LIKE FIVE BEDROOMS.

[01:20:03]

WHAT IS THE BIGGEST IMPACT THAT IT MIGHT HAVE WHEN TRYING TO DO THIS? SHE SAID YOU WILL HAVE TO DO THIS WHAT I'M DOING RIGHT NOW BUT I SAID HOW CAN YOU PEOPLE DO THIS? SHE SAID IT IS A THREE-TIER.

>> I SAID WHAT YOU MEAN. >> PUT THEM IN A HOME THREE TIMES THEY EAT NEXT TIME IT IS TO NEXT TIME IT IS ONE THAN IT IS JUST PHONE CALLS JUST TO CHECK UP ON THEM.

>> SHE SAYING MOST OF THE TIME IT IS FOR PACES AND 180.

SO I SAY SO HOW DID THAT WORK OUT FOR HER.

HOW DO YOU GO BY THAT? JUST LIKE WHILE I AM ALL ELECTRIC. YOU KNOW THE STRIKE YOU KNOW BUT OTHER THAN THAT SAID THEY NEVER HAVE TO DO EMERGENCY EVACUATION ANYTHING LIKE THAT I SAID WELL THAT'S GOOD.

AND I ASK HER LIKE A SO FOR THE PEOPLE YOU LET AND SAY EVERYBODY WAS... SAY JUST REMEMBER THIS LIKE WEBER LEARNED WANT TO PLAY GOLF YOU HAVE TO GO, YOU KNOW.

AND EVEN PAY MORE MONEY TO GO HERE AND PAYING MONEY TO GO THERE SHE SAYS IT OVER THERE I SAY YOU DON'T HAVE RELATIONS WITH THAT OR ANYBODY SAYING THIS THEY SAY NOW THAT IS MY HOUSE.

AND SO I JUST TOOK THAT ON AN CONSIDERATION ONCE AGAIN I HAVE A NICE HOME AND I WOULD LOVE TO OFFER IT TO PEOPLE WHO MIGHT NOT HAVE THE TIME TO GET OUT ARE THEY SIBLINGS ARE THEY LIKE KIDS OR TOO BUSY TO TAKE CARE OF THEM WERE THEY CANNOT STAY BY THEMSELVES ONCE AGAIN LIKE I'M NOT TRYING TO GET ON ANYBODY'S BAD SIDE I UNDERSTAND THE CONCERN, BUT I LOVE MY QUIET I LOVE MY PRIVACY. SO I MOVED INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD BECAUSE IT WAS QUIET AND FAR A WAY FROM EACH OTHER BUT OTHER

THAN THAT I AM GOOD. >> I JUST HAVE A QUICK QUESTION.

SO THIS IS IT YOUR PERSONAL HOME YOU DO LIVE THERE AND OCCUPY.

>> YES. >> I'M JUST KIND OF CURIOUS OBVIOUSLY THERE WAS THE NEED AN INDIVIDUALIZED CARE CHARGE IT

MORE. >> I CAN DO THAT I KNOW THIS HAS ONE BUT WE JUST LIKE PUT THE NAME OUT THERE SO WE DON'T HAVE TO REVISIT AGAIN. MY NEIGHBOR OFF THEY HAVE NOT DONE ANYTHING EITHER. DO YOU KNOW THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

THEY NOT WALKING DOWN LIKE TOTALLY WANTED TO SEE.

>> AND I'M GUESSING I MEAN THAT HOUSES SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 500,000 SO I MEAN IT IS AN EXPENSIVE INVESTMENT YOU MADE AS WELL.

I THINK IT WOULD AGREE YOU KNOW THERE IS PEOPLE WHO HAVE FOUR KIDS AND THAT IS SIX PEOPLE IN A HOUSE LOOK WE DON'T MAKE IT ALL ABOUT THAT WOULD YOU BE ABLE TO DO THAT?

>> I CAN DO THAT 100%. I DON'T HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH

THAT. >> WOULD YOU BE ABLE TO GET BY

WITH ONE OR TWO? >> YES.

JUST FREE AT ME AND MY WIFE. I CAN HIGHER WE CAN GO DO SOME PR POWER OURSELVES YOU KNOW GET OUT WE HAVE GRANDKIDS AS WELL SO IT HOPES ALL THE WAY AROUND, RIGHT.

RIGHT NOW WORKING WITH US I HAVE TO DO SOMETHING CODY BACK.

YOU KNOW WE ACCOMMODATE FOR WHAT WE HAVE TO DO.

>> I HAVE A QUESTION WITH THIS BEING TYPE B ASSISTED LIVING ASSUMING THEIR REQUIREMENTS WILL FALL IN LINE WITH THE OTHER YOU HAVE TO UPGRADE YOUR HOME TO ACCOMMODATE THIS TYPE B.

>> SO STAY WITH TEXAS CENTER FOR THAT IS ONLY IF YOU GO OUT.

[01:25:04]

IS WHAT I REALLY BE LOOKING FOR. >> ANY OTHER RESTRICTIONS AND/OR UPDATES YOU WILL HAVE TO MAKE ON THE HOME?

>> I BUILT MY HOUSE THIS IS IT IS PRETTY LARGE JUST FOR ME AND MY WIFE AND MY SON. SO WE BROUGHT MY MOTHER-IN-LAW IN. AND I PUT MY HOUSE TO HAVE SEPARATION. I HAVE THREE GROWN KIDS AND IF THEY COME BACK THEY ARE ON THAT SIDE OF THE HOUSE THEY DON'T JUST STAY ON OUR SIDE OF THE HOUSE.

THAT IS ONE OF THE REASONS WHY IT IS FELT LIKE THAT.

SO NO ONE HAD TO COME BACK LIKE THAT AS OF YET SO I HOPE TO STAY

THAT WAY. >> AS A MOTHER OF TEENAGERS I COULD GO WITH YOU BECAUSE I COULD HAVE SOME SEPARATION

SOMETIMES. >> ANYTHING ELSE SHE WOULD LIKE

TO SAY TO THE COMMISSIONERS? >> AND YOU KNOW AS FAR AS THE NEIGHBORS GO I CAN SAY I'M NOT TRYING TO DISTURB ANYBODY.

>> THIS IS HOA REFERENCE? >> YES, SIR,.

>> HAVE YOU LOOKED AT NOT HAVE THE BUSINESS IN THE HOME.

>> I KNOW THIS THIS IS LOOKING AT EVERYTHING BUT I'M DOWN TO EARTH. NO QUESTION OF WHAT I CAN DO.

I TAKE CARE OF MY PROPERTY AND I UNDERSTAND I HAVE TO WORK IN ORDER TO DO ANYTHING TO THE PROVINCE -- PROPERTY.

>> NO WORRIES I CHECKED IT OUT JUST TO BE SURE.

>> NO PROBLEM THAT IS THE REASON WHY IF I WANTED TO KEEP LIKE PROBABLY ABOUT MOST LIKELY DO THAT ANYWAY.

>> WE DO HAVE A FEW PEOPLE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK SO BRING THEM UP IF YOU WILL HAVE A SEAT THEN WE WAIT -- THAN WE MAY CALL YOU BACK UP IN JUST A FEW MINUTES ALL RIGHT, GUYS.

WE HAVE STACKS AND STACKS OF PAPER HERE SO AGAIN BEAR WITH ME. OUR FIRST SPEAKER THE LAST ONE THAT CAME ON MY STACK HERE CALVIN JOHNSON.

YOU PRESENT. ALL RIGHT, PLEASE COME DOWN STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND AS A REMINDER YOU HAVE 3 MINUTES

TO SPEAK. >> GREETINGS MY NAME IS CALVIN JOHNSON AND I LIVE AT 40 TO 60 WHICH IS DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET.

SO I TOOK A LITTLE OPPOSITION WHEN I RECEIVED THE POSTCARD AND EVERYTHING ELSE IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD TO SPEAK TO ME.

WE BOTH MOVE INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AT THE SAME TIME OUR HOMES WERE BOTH BUILT BY THE SAME HOMEBUILDER AND WE TALK AND WE SEE EACH OTHER SO I WAS A LITTLE FLABBERGASTED I GUESS I SHOULD SAY TO KNOW THAT THERE WOULD BE A GROUP HOME DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM ME. I AM A 31 YEAR RETIREE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT. I'VE DEALT WITH THE GROUP HOMES THE BETTER PART OF MY LIFE. I WORK FOR MAJOR CITIES SO I KNOW WHAT TYPE OF ATMOSPHERE THEY CAN BRING.

I DID A LITTLE BIT OF RESEARCH BEFORE I GOT HERE AND I SEE THAT THERE WERE THREE SUVS -- SUP ON THIS AGENDA AND OVER THE LAST TWO YEARS THEY HAD NOT BEEN WORKED.

THIS IS THE FIRST TIME I LOOKED AT THE AGENDA FOR TWO YEARS AND THERE HAS NOT BEEN ONE FOR A GROUP HOME FOR A SUP FOR A GROUP HOME FOR THE LAST TWO YEARS SO DID SOMETHING CHANGE IN MIDLOTHIAN? WHY ALL OF A SUDDEN ARE THE THREE REQUESTS FOR GROUP HOMES IN ONE SITTING.

I MEAN IS THIS SOMETHING THAT THERE IS SOMEBODY ELSE GETTING TO THESE PEOPLE TO ASK THEM FOR A GROUP HOME? YOU KNOW SOMEBODY ON THE COMMISSION ASKED THE QUESTION OF WAS THIS TRANSFERABLE BECAUSE IF THERE IS SOMEBODY ELSE WHO WAS ACTUALLY ASKING FOR THESE PEOPLE TO HAVE GROUP HOMES AND THEN THEY COME IN AND BUY THESE HOMES FROM THEM AFTER IT HAS ALREADY

[01:30:02]

MAKE NO MISTAKE ABOUT IT THIS IS A MONEY GRAB.

THIS IS WHAT IT IS. IT IS A MONEY GRAB.

BY HIS OWN ADMISSION HE SAID THAT HIS MOTHER-IN-LAW ALREADY LIVES THERE. YOU DO NOT NEED A SUP YOU DO NOT NEED TO CHANGE THE ZONING SHE HAS BEEN LIVING THERE SINCE THEY MOVED THEN. OKAY.

YOU DO NOT NEED TO CHANGE THAT SUP.

>> OKAY. >> THE THINGS I DID NOT FIND OUR THE LAND USE STATEMENT OF A PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE THE LAND USE

STATEMENT? >> YES, IT IS PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE

IT IS ONLINE. >> IS IT? OKAY, I WILL GO BACK AND LOOK AGAIN THANK YOU.

>> I'M SORRY WE ARE AT THE END OF THE 3 MINUTES.

>> OKAY. >> YOU KNOW I PICKED THIS NEIGHBORHOOD BECAUSE I WORKED IN THE CITY OF DALLAS I WORKED THERE FOR 31 YEARS AND MY WIFE AND I WANTED TO RETIRE IN A NEIGHBORHOOD TO WHERE I DID NOT HAVE TO SOAK IN THE GROCERY STORE AT THE SAME PEOPLE -- SHOP AND THE GROCERY STORE WITH THE EYE DON'T WANT TO WALK WITH THE GUY I PUT IN JAIL 31 YEARS AGO SOMEWHERE IN THAT TIME FRAME AND TO BE CLEAR YOU WILL NOT FIND A 500,000-DOLLAR HOUSE IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, OKAY? THE HOUSE BEHIND ME JUST SOLD LAST YEAR FOR $1.15 MILLION.

THIS IS THE TYPE OF NEIGHBORHOOD WE ARE LIVING AGAIN AND THIS IS THE TYPE OF NEIGHBORHOOD THAT I WANTED TO GET SOME TYPE OF USE OUT OF AND QUIET USE IN MY RETIREMENT YEARS.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. THANK YOU.

>> OUR NEXT SPEAKER IS BENJAMIN ZUCKER AND IF YOU WOULD PLEASE

STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. >> I LIVE AT 40 TO 40 WISTERIA

TRAIL. >> THANK YOU YOU HAVE 3 MINUTES.

>> THANK YOU. MY HOUSE IS AN OLD BARN HOUSE.

THIS PROPERTY IS DOWN THE CORNER FROM ME I AM OPPOSED TO THIS FOR SEVERAL REASONS. I HAVE PROVIDED YOU GUYS WITH SEVERAL SIGNATURES AS WELL FROM OTHER NEIGHBORS THAT ARE OPPOSED TO THIS MUCH LIKE MR. JOHNSON I HAVE BEEN A FIRST RESPONDER FOR 35 YEARS. THE FIRST FIVE YEARS OF THAT WAS AN EMS I HAVE BEEN IN MORE GROUP HOMES THEN AND CARE FACILITIES THAN I CAN COUNTER. I HAVE SEEN SEVERAL RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITIES THAT IT JUST MAKES ME SAD TO WALK IN THERE.

THEY ARE CLEARLY IN IT FOR THE MONEY I SEE SUBPART CARE SUBPART NUTRITION PEOPLE ARE PUT OUT OF BEDS.

OUR NEIGHBORHOOD IS NOT INTENDED FOR THIS USE.

YOU TALK ABOUT BYLAWS ALTHOUGH I DO HAVE SECTION OF THE 41 POINTS 4.1 SUBSECTION THREE AND IMPROVEMENT WHICH IS INTENDED FOR OTHER THAN SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES WHICH MAY BECOME AN ANNOYANCE OR NUISANCE FOR RESIDENTS IS NOT PERMITTED THAT IS STRAIT FROM... THE MAJOR CONCERNS THAT I HAVE IS OUR AREA IS COVERED BY FIRE STATION NUMBER 2.

THEY HAVE ABOUT 25 SQUARE MILES THAT THEY HAVE TO COVER.

THIS LOCATION IS NOWHERE CENTRAL TO THAT FIRE STATION.

THE NEAREST HOSPITAL IS MILES AND MILES AWAY FROM THE STATION.

IF THEY NEED EMS THEY WOULD BE ON THE LONG HAUL TO GET THERE.

THEY NEED A POLICE THEY HAVE TO COME FROM EVEN FURTHER THE ROAD TO GET TO THE HOSPITAL IS EITHER UP JO WILSON OR DOWN ONE GROWTH AND NEITHER ONE OF THOSE STREETS IS CONDUCIVE FOR PATIENT CARE IN THE BACK OF AN AMBULANCE I CAN TELL YOU THAT.

MORNING GLORY IS A MAJOR THOROUGH FARE BETWEEN WALNUT GROVE IT IS ALREADY HIGH WITH -- I TRAVELED.

EVERY RESIDENT OF OLD FARMHOUSE HAS TO TRAVEL ON MORNING GLORY TO GET TO THEIR HOME. SO I HAVE A LOT OF CONCERNS ABOUT THIS WITH 3100 SQUARE FEET OF HOME AND 12 RESIDENTS AND I HAVE HEARD THEM SAY THAT YOU WANT TO PRODUCE THAT BUT I HAVE HEARD NO MOTIONS TO DO SO. AND IT ALSO INCLUDES A RESIDENCE

[01:35:08]

AND YOU KNOW I HEAR THE DINING ROOM WILL BE TAKEN OVER FOR RESIDENTIAL USE INTEREST SO I AM HIGHLY OPPOSED TO THIS.

>> YOU WERE OUT OF TIME. >> OKAY.

>> THANK YOU. >> OUR NEXT SPEAKER IS DARRELL

BABBITT. >> HELLO THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO COME UP AND TALK ON THIS SUBJECT I LIVE AT THE CORNER OF MORNING GLORY JUST BASICALLY DOWN THE STREET.

>> COULD YOU STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.

>> DARRELL BABBITT HAND YOU KNOW THE CONCERNS I HAVE OUR PARKING, THE TRAFFIC YOU KNOW WITH THIS WITH THIS SET OF PRECEDENT IT SEEMS TO BE A PRETTY HOT TOPIC TONIGHT WOULD IT SET A PRECEDENT FOR OTHER GROUP HOMES IN THE AREA? AND YOU KNOW THE CHANGE IN THE ZONING CAN MY MIND YOU KNOW THAT WE THOUGHT WHEN WE PURCHASED THE HOME AND IT HAS AN HOA YOU KNOW WE ARE THINKING OKAY YOU KNOW THIS IS OUR LAST HOME.

WE'RE THINKING OKAY THIS WILL BE A GOOD SPOT TO FINISH UP LOOKING IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD ACTUALLY WE READ THE HOA BYLAWS BEFORE WE PURCHASED THE HOUSE. AND THIS DOES NOT FIT ANY OF THAT. I'M THINKING OBVIOUSLY IF WE ALL LIVE LONG ENOUGH WE WILL ALL NEED THIS TYPE OF SERVICE.

THERE ARE PLACES TO GET THIS KIND OF SERVICE.

AND YOU KNOW ZONE CORRECTLY AND OUTSIDE OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

AND I KNOW SOME PEOPLE DO PUT THEIR FAMILY AND THIS KIND OF PLACES AND WALK OFF. MY MOTHER WAS IN ONE OF THESE PLACES. AND YOU KNOW THE OTHER THING IS IS YOU DON'T KNOW THE HOUSES ON THIS HAS ALREADY BEEN BROUGHT UP YOU KNOW IT IS A MODIFIED BECAUSE YOU'VE GOT TO ASSUME OKAY YOU MAY NOT NEED THE POWER OF SEPARATION BUT YOU WILL HAVE TO MAKE IT ADA YOU NOTE FOR WHEELCHAIRS AND THAT KIND OF THING IN THE HOUSES ALL MODIFIED TO THAT KIND OF USE PRETTY MUCH WHAT IT IS MADE FROM THAT. AND YOU KNOW THAN WE GET CONCERNED ABOUT SOMETHING ELSE TAKE YOU GET OVER.

HOME HEALTH CARE TRAFFIC ONCE AGAIN THE ADA REGULATIONS AND I ASK ON BEHALF OF RESIDENTS THAT THIS WOULD GET A NONRECOMMENDATION THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR TIME.

>> THANK YOU. >> OUR NEXT SPEAKER IS I'M SORRY, HE IS A NONSPEAKER. I BELIEVE THAT THAT IS THE LAST OF OUR SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM. WE HAVE SEVERAL NONSPEAKERS AND I WILL GO THROUGH THESE. POPE DETERMINE, NONSPEAKER IN SUPPORT OF. JESSICA WARD NONSPEAKER AND OPPOSITION, JAMES MCNEILL, NONSPEAKER AND OPPOSITION, JAMES A WEIDNER NONSPEAKER AND OPPOSITION, DR. WILLIAMS IS A NONSPEAKER AND OPPOSITION. WE HAVE LINDA MCNEIL.

NONSPEAKER AND OPPOSITION. STEPHEN HARRIS, NONSPEAKER AND OPPOSITION. PHILIP PEARSON NONSPEAKER AND OPPOSITION. I APOLOGIZE IN ADVANCE I'M NOT GOING TO GET THIS NAME RIGHT. WILSON.

CAN YOU SEE YOUR NAME FOR ME, PLEASE? THAT ONE THERE. IN OPPOSITION AND I WILL GET

[01:40:04]

AND WE HAD ONE HAND RAISED THERE.

YOU WANTING TO SPEAK. YES, YOU MAY COME FORWARD AND SPEAK. SO AFTER YOU SPEAK IF YOU WILL FILL OUT A FORM SO WE HAVE THE RECORD PLEASE, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME, ADDRESS, AND 3 MINUTES YOU WILL HAVE.

>> I'M THE OWNER OF SKYVIEW CUSTOM HOME AND ALSO STAY AT HOME HEALTH CARE AND GROUP HOME IN DALLAS, TEXAS.

HE IS MY NEIGHBOR. THE REASON I'M ASKING FOR DENIAL IS BECAUSE I HAVE BEEN IN HIS HOUSE BEFORE.

6704 IN THE PROCESS TEXAS. THOUSAND SQUARE-FOOT HOME HOA COMMUNITY. TRAFFIC ON THEIR WAS HORRIBLE.

SIX PEOPLE RESIDENT LIVING IN THAT HOUSE, I WAS FORCED TO RELOCATE. ON MY DECISION AT THE HOA.

THEN I MOVE INTO THREE '03 DUNCANVILLE THAT IS MY MAIN OFFICE. A PRIVATE COMMERCIAL GROUP HOME.

THAT MY OFFICE IS AT 303. THEN IT RIGHT NOW I TRANSITION FROM THAT MOVE AWAY OPEN UP THE SKYVIEW.

SO THE REASON I'M ASKING TONIGHT THE QUOTE.

AND HIS BACKYARD IS NOT TAKEN CARE.

AND WHAT SPACE DO THEY HAVE THEY HAVE NOTHING.

HOUSE WORTH OVER $5 MILLION. EVERYONE HERE WILL MY HOUSE AND THE HIGHEST COST IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

SO TO ALLOW THAT FOR HIM TO BRING IN A GROUP HOME IN OUR COMMUNITY BECAUSE I ALREADY HAVE THAT EXPERIENCE BEFORE IN OUR COMMUNITY. AND I HAVE TO TELL MYSELF THAT TO RELOCATE MY BUSINESS SO THAT EVERYBODY CAN BE HAPPY AND THE GROUP HOME THAT I HAD ON THEIR IT DROVE THE PROPERTY VALUE DOWN. $147,000 I SOLD MY PROPERTY FOR.

THE MOMENT AND WITH THE WAY IT CAME UP TO $500,000.

YOU KNOW WHO PUT THE HOME BACKUP.

USED OWNED BY THE... THAT USED TO BE THE CORPORATE HOUSE. SO WHEN I WENT ON BOARD THAT PROPERTY AND RETAIN THAT PROPERTY UNTIL TODAY AND NOW AND DUNCANVILLE AS A COMMERCIAL THE PROPERTY WENT WIDE.

HERE IS 600,000 OTHER HOME. IT IS GOING TO DROP I DON'T WANT THAT. PLEASE I DON'T WANT THIS.

HOA HOA. AND IN 2017 THE CITY SAYS WE HAVE REQUIREMENT. THEN IT WAS CHANGE AMENDED.

NO GROUP HOMES. WE HAVE TO MAINTAIN THE NEW ADDITION REQUIRE THE TWO ADDITIONS.

MR. WILLIAMS RIGHT HERE THAT IS HIS NAME.

EVERY SINGLE PROJECT IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD GUESS WHO BUILDS THAT? I'M THE ONE.

SO WHEN I SEE SOMETHING THAT'S GOING TO AFFECT THE NEIGHBORHOOD I'M GOING TO SPEAK. I KNOW I'M SORRY I KNOW IT WILL

[01:45:01]

100%. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. WERE YOU SIGNED UP TO SPEAK.

I'M GOING TO ALLOW THIS LAST SPEAKER AND THEN I THINK WE HAVE

A CONSENSUS AND WE WILL GO AHEAD >> THANK YOU MY NAME IS WILLIAM MILLS I AM THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT IS GARAGE FACING TO THE APPLICANT. ADDRESS 350 TO ONE MORNING GLORY PARKWAY. EVERYBODY ELSE IN THE COMMUNITY QUITE A BIT IN OUR HOMES WE CARE ABOUT HOW HER OHM'S -- HOMES LOOK AND HOW THEY ARE MAINTAINED I'M NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE GROUP HOME AND ALL OF THESE DIFFERENT THINGS THAT ARE PUBLIC UP SO THIS IS A VERY NEW TO ME. BUT WHAT I DO KNOW IS AS A NEIGHBOR FACING THE APPLICANT OUR GARAGE WAS FACING SO AT TIMES WHEN I COME OUT OF THE GARAGE THEY WILL COME OUT OF THEIR GARAGE THERE WERE A MODIFICATION THAT NEEDS TO BE MADE TO THE ZONE IN ORDER FOR IT TO BE COMPLIANT FOR OCCUPANCIES OF GREATER THAN WHAT IT WAS DESIGNED AND USED FOR THIS MAKES A REAL CHALLENGE FOR US IN THE COMMUNITY.

SO I WOULD JUST ECHO EVERYTHING ALREADY SAID BUT WE SHOULD NOT

EVEN BE HERE TODAY. >> THANK YOU IF YOU WILL MAKE CERTAIN COMPLETE A FORM. WITH THAT DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING? WITH THE MOTION SECOND VOTE WE HAVE 5-0 THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED DO WE HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS ABOUT THE APPLICANT OR STAFF.

>> I HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF. COULD THIS BE MORE SPREAD AND SAY FOR EXAMPLE... ATTACHED TO...

AND WE HAVE TO HAVE E.R.... YOU KNOW OBVIOUSLY OF A COMPANY'S PROJECTS AND IT MAY BE A LITTLE BIT TO A BEDROOM FREE BUT MAYBE WE CAN CREATE A PRODUCT OF A HIRE QUALITY GROUP HOME BUT I DON'T KNOW IF THAT WILL BUTT HEADS WITH.

CAN WE CHANGE THOSE RULES. >> I'M JUST SITTING HERE WITH MY QUEST LOT IN FRONT OF ME. I'VE DONE THIS IN YEARS PASSED.

[LAUGHTER] FIRST OF ALL A COUPLE THINGS IS SOME LIMITED PREEMPTION WITH RESULT TO TYPE B AS FAR AS BEING ABLE TO RESTRICT THEM FROM BEING LOCATED IN CERTAIN ZONING DISTRICTS PRIMARILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS.

FOR EXAMPLE TYPE B PERSONAL CARE FACILITY AVERAGE 247 WOULD QUALIFY AS A COMMUNITY HOME IF IT HAD SIX OR FEWER RESIDENTS.

AND WHICH CASE WE WOULD BE TOTALLY PREEMPTED FROM ZONING THAT OUT. I DO NOT KNOW THE EXACT AS FAR AS SOME OF THE OTHER RESTRICTIONS ARE PLACED ON IT THAT YOU MENTIONED. BUT I THINK TYPICALLY TO THE EXTENT THAT THOSE WOULD TYPICAL PRESIDENTIAL PASSES AND USES.

WHICH TYPE B PERSONAL CARE FACILITIES QUALIFY FOR THAT.

>> YOU SAY 66 RESIDENTS? >> NOW THEY STILL HAVE TO BE LICENSED. SO THEY CAN DO THAT.

I DON'T KNOW AGAIN SOME OF THE OTHER RESTRICTIONS I DON'T KNOW THE SPECIFIC BUT I DO KNOW THERE HAVE BEEN A GROUP HOME ORDINANCES IN THE PAST WHERE THERE HAVE BEEN SOME CHALLENGES AND WITH THE ORIGINAL GROUP HOME LAWSUITS ACTUALLY...

WAS ACTUALLY THE ORNAMENT... IT DID BREAK A WAY TO CAPACITY.

SO MANY RESIDENTS PER BEDROOM. YES, I BELIEVE THERE ARE GROUP HOMES WERE YOU GET BEYOND THAT SIX RESIDENT PREEMPTION BUT LIKE

[01:50:05]

SO HAD SPACE TO OPERATE THE HOME WITH REGULATIONS ON IT YOU KNOW SO IF THERE IS NO MORE TYPICALLY THE TYPE OF RESIDENCE OVER THE YEARS TYPE OF RESIDENCE ALTHOUGH THEY TYPICALLY ARE DRIVING MANY TIMES THOSE FATALITIES WILL ACTUALLY...

SO TRANSPORTATION FOR THE RESIDENTS SO I BELIEVE THERE IS THERE COULD BE A GROUP HOME ORDINANCE COULD BE DEVELOPMENT A LITTLE BIT MORE SIGNIFICANTLY MORE ROBUST THAN IF THE RESIDENT IN COUNCIL WANTED TO GO THAT DIRECTION.

>> WE SEE THREE OF THESE EACH. >> AT LEAST THE APPLICANTS HAVE

SOME GUIDANCE. >> RIGHT AND I THINK IT IS KIND OF LIKE WHAT WE DO YOU KNOW THE CONCEPT MAY BE IN A POSSIBLE IF THERE IS SOMETHING ALONG THE LINES ABOUT SOMETHING WE HAVE DONE WITH RESPECT TO A MINIMUM SET OF STANDARDS FOR A GROUP HOME BASED ON OCCUPANCY QUALITY YOU KNOW ARCHITECTURE WILL DESIGN THAT KIND OF THING SO IT STILL INTEGRATES INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD BUT BUT IT DOESN'T HAVE A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ONE THING IF THERE IS QUESTION ON PRIOR CASES STARTING YOU KNOW WHAT IT COULD THIS EVOLVE INTO WHILE ALL THREE OF THESE ORDINANCES FOR THESE THREE CASES ALL HAVE PRETTY MUCH THE SAME DEFINITION AND IT INCLUDED CERTAIN TYPES OF RESIDENCE YOU KNOW THE ELDERLY, THE KIND OF GROUP LIVING, IT DID NOT EXPAND TO SOME OF THE OTHER TYPES OF USES THAT WE ARE TALKING YOU KNOW THAT I THINK ARE MORE OF A CONCERN LIKE HALFWAY HOUSES SO THESE PARTICULAR ORDINANCES DID NOT OR WOULD NOT HAVE ALLOWED...

GO TO THE COUNCIL THEY HAVE... CONSENT YOU KNOW BUT I BELIEVE

THEY STILL CAN. >> WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF CASE LAW AND STATUTE ROUTINE GROUP HOME ORDINANCE AND AGAIN IF SOMEBODY WANTS TO EXCEED THOSE SET OF STANDARDS THAT ALLOWS IT THAN YOU KNOW WE CAN CREATE SPACING AND SPACING REQUIREMENTS SO THERE IS NOT WHAT I BELIEVE THERE IS POSSIBILITY THAT WE CAN HAVE SPACING REQUIREMENTS. SO THERE WAS NOT A CONCENTRATION OF GROUP HOMES IN THE PARTICULAR NEIGHBORHOOD AT LEAST THEY ARE NOT TAKING OVER BUT THERE IS A LOT OF OPTIONS I BELIEVE IF THE COMMISSION AND COUNCIL MOVE FORWARD.

>> I JUST WANT TO EXPAND UPON WHAT YOU WERE SAYING KEVIN.

SO FOR EVERYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE WHAT WE HAVE IN FRONT OF US AS COMMISSIONERS IS CALLED OUR PACKET AND IT DOES SAY THAT THE ZONING ORDINANCE DEFINES A GROUP HOME AS A FAMILY-BASED FACILITY WHICH CONTAINS NOT MORE THAN 15 RESIDENTS AND THREE SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL AND WHICH PROVIDES 24-HOUR CARE AND PROTECTIVE LIVING ARRANGEMENT WITH THE MENTALLY OR PHYSICALLY IMPAIRED, OF A LIMIT TO THE DISABLED, VICTIMS OF ABUSE OR NEGLECT, AND CLASSIFICATION INCLUDES PRIOR LIVING FACILITIES FOR THE ELDERLY AND MATERNITY HOMES, EMERGENCY SHELTERS DURING CRISIS INTERVENTION FOR VICTIMS OF CRIME AND ABUSE AND NEGLECT, AND RESIDENTS SERVICES LICENSED BY THE TEXAS COMMISSION ON ALCOHOL AND DRUG ABUSE BUT NOT PRIMARILY FOR CRIMINAL REHABILITATION.

SO THERE ARE A LOT OF OTHER THINGS THAT COULD HAPPEN TO HAVE AT THIS POINT ALL THREE OF THESE ARE SPECIFICALLY FOR MENTALLY AND/OR PHYSICALLY IMPAIRED, DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED, INCLUDING LIVING FACILITIES FOR THE ELDERLY.

>> WOULD BE DIRECTING THE STAFF WITH THE APPLICANTS BASICALLY TOOK THE SUBSET OF OUR ZONING ORDERS DEFINITION AND DID NOT ALLOW FOR FULL EVERYTHING ALLOWED UNDER THE CURRENT

ORDINANCE. >> YES.

>> BECAUSE I AM IN THE BIG SUITE TONIGHT I DO WANT TO THANK YOU FOR THE WORK YOU GIVE TO YOUR MOTHER ALIVE GRANDPARENTS WHO

[01:55:03]

WE DO HAVE FACILITIES IN OUR COMMUNITY THAT ARE AMAZING FACILITIES AND I'M SAYING SPECIFICALLY HOMES IN NEIGHBORHOODS THAT THEY DID NOT KNOW THAT PEOPLE WOULD NOT KNOW IT WAS A GROUP HOME. SO I AM PERSONALLY FAMILIAR WITH THAT. THERE IS A NEED.

THAT BEING SAID THE PUBLIC HEARING HAS CLOSED AND DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR APPLICANT OR STAFF?

ANY OF THE DISCUSSIONS WE HAVE? >> PROPOSE DENIAL AS PRESENTED.

>> DO WE HAVE A SECOND? >> SECOND.

>> WITH THAT WE HAVE A MOTION AND SECOND TO DENY AS PRESENTED ALL IN FAVOR OF DENYING RAISE YOUR HAND IT IS 5-0 DENIED.

OKAY AGAIN BECAUSE I AM IN THE BIG SEAT I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE ITEM NUMBER 12 NEXT ON THE LIST AND THEN WE WILL TAKE A

[012 Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone 3.2510+ acres out of the J.H. Jones Survey, Abstract No. 586 from Agricultural (A) District to Single-Family Two (SF2) District. The property is located at 1850 McAlpin Road. (Z05-2026-009)]

SORRY FOR THROWING Q OFF. [LAUGHTER] WE WILL GET TO THE CORPORATE PEOPLE LAST.

>> THANK YOU FOR KEEPING ME ON MY TOES.

[LAUGHTER] YOU ARE WELCOME OKAY.

>> AND MARIAN SPENSER ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF PLANNING THE NEXT REQUEST IS A REQUEST TO REZONE 3.25 ACRES OF A SINGLE-FAMILY LOT THAT IS CURRENTLY 3.25 ACRES IN SIZE TO FROM SORRY, AGRICULTURAL A ZONING TO SINGLE FAMILIES IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT A NEW DWELLING ON ONE LOT AND KEEP THE CURRENT HOME ON THE SECOND LOT. THE PROPOSED LOT ONE IS TO .17 ACRES WHICH IS THE CURRENT DWELLING AND A LOT TO IS 1.07 ACRES WHICH IS THE NEW PROPOSED DWELLING SO KARTIK OUR FUTURE MIDLOTHIAN 2045'S COUNTRY MODULES WHICH ALLOWS FOR UP TO .5 BUILDING UNITS PER ANCHOR LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND THE PROPOSED ZONING IS PARTIALLY CONSISTENT WITH THE PROPOSED USE TO LOT ONE BEING THE POINT THE .5 BUILDING UNITS PER ANCHOR AND A LOT TO MEANING ONE DWELLING UNIT PER ANCHOR.

THIS IS IN THE ZONING MAP SHOWING EVERYTHING CORRODED -- AROUND IT IS AGRICULTURAL ZONE EVERYTHING IS ALSO COUNTRY MODULE THIS IS THE CURRENT SURVEY MAP OF THE PROPERTY AS YOU CAN SEE IT IS FOR ONE LOT. NORTH IS FACING TO THE RIGHT AND IT IS 3.24 ACRES WHAT THEY ARE PROPOSING TO DO IS SPLIT IT AS SHOWN HERE WHERE THE EXISTING DRIVE APPROACH CONFIGURATION IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN THE MINIMUM OF 150 FEET OF FRONTAGE THAT IS REQUIRED FOR THE SINGLE-FAMILY NUMBER 2 ZONING AND IT MEETS ALL OF THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SF TO LOTS FOR THE NEW PROPOSED LOT NUMBER 2 AND THE EXISTING LOT THE MAJORITY OF THE PROPER USE REMAINING ON THE EXISTING LOT WITH THE EXISTING COME TODAY. THE APPLICANTS ARE PROPOSING TO MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY NUMBER 2 ON THE NEW HOME THAT IS CONSTRUCTED AFTER THEY PLOT THIS.

THIS SMALL -- MAP SHOWS ALL THE ADJACENT PROPERTY -- PROPERTIES THAT HAVE REGISTERED NONCONFORMING WITH THE CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN. ARE AGRICULTURAL ZONING DOES REQUIRE 4 ACRES CURRENTLY ALL OF THESE LOTS DO NOT MEET THE

[02:00:02]

ONE SIDE WAS PLACED ON THE PROPERTY AND NOTICE OF MAY 26 CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE PUBLISHED ON MAY TENTH.

STAFF HAS RECEIVED NO CORRESPONDENCE FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. STAFF DOES RECOMMEND DENIAL OF THE REZONING BECAUSE IT IS PARTIALLY CONSISTENT WITH FUTURE LAND USE MAP. WHICH IS THE DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. AND DENSITY.

THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. >> LET ME TURN THEM A MICROPHONE HERE. WHAT IS THE MINIMUM FINANCIAL

REQUIREMENT 150 FEET. >> BECAUSE IT IS ON ARTERIAL.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF. >> IT LOOKS LIKE ON THE MAP HAVE WE NOT OBTAINED IS THIS FORT RIGHT AWAY HAVE THEY NOT OBTAIN

THE PROPERTY EXPANSION? >> WE HAVE ALREADY ACQUIRED IT

FROM THE PROPERTY OWNERS. >> IS THE APPLICANT HERE.

WOULD YOU PLEASE COME OVER TO? >> HELLO I AM LUCAS NIXON 1815

MACGUFFIN. >> TELL US WHAT YOU WANT US TO

HEAR. >> THE ORIGINAL LOT WAS WHEN IT

WAS AN ACT. >> WE ARE SIMPLY WANTING TO BUILD A NEW HOUSE ON THE FRONT SIDE OF THAT CUTOUT SECTION THAT YOU SAW. SO GO TO 2000 SQUARE-FOOT HOUSE.

THE THING WE DISCUSSED WAS THAT WE WERE LIMITED BECAUSE OF THE FUTURE USAGE. BECAUSE BASICALLY WANTED TO BE

ONE HOUSE ON 2 ACRES. >> CURRENTLY SITS IN THE FAMILY'S TRUST AND MINING. WANTING TO ESSENTIALLY CUT THAT ONE SUCTION OUT SO I CAN FINANCE THE BOAT OF THE NEW HOUSE.

SADLY MY POCKETS ARE NOT THAT DEEP.

THIS IS MORBID BUT MY GRANDFATHER IS 90.

YOU WILL BE 90 IN JUNE AND THEN AFTER THAT WHEN HE PASSES I'M GOING TO ESSENTIALLY TAKE BACK OVER THAT SECOND SECTION.

EVEN THE RIGHT NOW WITH THAT ONE SECTION IT WOULD NOT BE IT IS GOING TO BE THE .5 ACRES OR BASICALLY HALF A HOUSE PER ACRE.

WHENEVER THAT TIME COMES AND I HOPE IT IS NOT SOON BUT IT WILL HAPPEN THEN WE WILL TAKE THAT BACK OVER.

SO IN THE INTERIM THAT IS WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO DO.

WE HAVE MET THE REQUIREMENTS THAT WE HAVE GOT WITH THE LAND AND EVERYTHING LIKE THAT AND AS YOU ASKED, OR I BELIEVE YOU ASKED THERE IS 150-FOOT FRENCH THAT WAY THERE IS NOT A FLAG LOT OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. THAT IS WHAT WE ARE ANTICIPATING

THAT IS WHAT WE ARE HOPING. >> IS IT YOUR INTENTION TO USE THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO ACCESS THE HOUSE FROM THE BACK?

>> EVERYTHING WE DO WOULD BE BRAND-NEW.

ADMITTEDLY HIS DRIVEWAY IS KIND OF OLD GRAVEL STYLE I WANTED TO DOVETAIL INTO THAT. INITIALLY WE MET WITH THE RMD OR I FORGET WHAT YOU CALL IT BUT THE MEETING ON TUESDAY AFTERNOON SOMETHING LIKE THAT ARE THE WAY WE MET WITH HIM AND ONE OF THE THINGS THEY RECOMMENDED WAS THAT THEY PUT IN A NEW DRIVEWAY DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM ANOTHER DRIVEWAY.

THAT IS KIND OF WHAT OUR GOAL IS ANYWAYS.

>> DECENT PAY DRIVEWAY ON THAT SIDE.

>> I DO UNDERSTAND BEING ON REAL ESTATE THE ASPECT OF TRYING TO GET FINANCE WE HAVE TO HAVE IT SURVEYED OFF.

>> I KNOW I WAS JUST ASKED TO REITERATE RIGHT A WAY WITH THE

[02:05:03]

EXPANSION. >> I HAD TO THE PURCHASE.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF THIS APPLICANT TO? OKAY THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING HOWEVER, WE HAVE NOBODY WHO SIGNED UP TO SPEAK IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE YOU NEED US TO

KNOW. >> NO, MA'AM.

WITH THAT DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING? ALL RIGHT. AND UPVOTES TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING? PASSES 5-0 THE PUBLIC HEARING DISCLOSED. ALL RIGHT.

DO WE HAVE A MOTION? FOR ANY DISCUSSION? ALL RIGHT WITH THAT I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS AS IT IS PRESENTED. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO APPROVE AS PRESENTED. ALL IN FAVOR OF APPROVAL WE HAVE BEFORE-1. IT DOES PASS.

ALL RIGHT. WITH THAT WE'RE GOING TO TAKE A FIVE-MINUTE BREAK, WATER, ALL

[011 Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone 593.939+ acres out of the W. M. Lick Survey, Abstract No. 620, J.P. Neill Survey, Abstract No. 1387, E. Rice Survey, Abstract No. 929, A.R. Newton Survey, Abstract No. 807, P.I.C. Survey, Abstract No. 1240, Z. Heath Survey, Abstract No. 455, J. Kyser Survey, Abstract No. 597, W. Wilkins Survey, Abstract No. 1162, JR Beauchamp Survey, Abstract No. 1201, AR Newton Survey, Abstract No. 809, and I. Cooper Survey, Abstract No. 226, from Agricultural (A) District and Planned Development District No. 136 (PD-136) to Planned Development District No. 136 (PD-136), and to Amend The property is located east of Lakeway Esplanade and Homestead Road, and northwest of US Highway 287 and Rex Odom Drive. (Z04-2026-008)]

>> SINCE I DID NOT PAUSE THE MEETING WE ARE OFFICIALLY BACK IN SESSION. ART NEXT ITEM IS 011.

CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST TO REZONE 59- CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST TO REZONE 593.939+ ACRES OUT OF THE W. M. LICK SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 620, J.P. NEILL SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1387, E. RICE SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 929, A.R. NEWTON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 807, P.I.C.

SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1240, Z. HEATH SURVEY, ABSTRACT

NO. 455, J. KYSER SURVEY, >> MODEM SURE I WILL SAVE YOU THE TROUBLE OF HAVING TO READ ALL OF THOSE NUMBERS.

WE WILL MOVE ONTO ITEM 12. >> THAT IS THE CASE NUMBER.

THE CASE NUMBER IS Z04-2026-008. >> THE NEXT ITEM IS A REQUEST TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM A AGRICULTURAL TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 136 FOR SINGLE-FAMILY NUMBER 1 USES.

THE SINGLE SITE THAT IS BEING CHANGED IS 593-POINT 939 ACRES IN SIZE. THEY ARE PROPOSING SIX SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICTS, ONE TOWNHOME SUBDISTRICTS, TO MIXED-USE DISTRICT, WIN INDUSTRIAL SUBDISTRICTS, AND ONE COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT.

I THINK OUR FUTURE MIDLOTHIAN 2045 IS A MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL REGIONAL AND CORPORATE MODULE.

THE DWELLING UNITS FOR MEETING -- MEETING DENSITY RESIDENTIAL IS 3-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE THE APPLICATION IS CONSISTENT AT 3.46 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. THIS IS KIND OF RESUME AND OF THE PROPERTY AS YOU CAN SEE IT IS ADJACENT TO THE AIRPORT AND THIS IS THE EXISTING PHASE ONE OF BRIDGEWATER AND IT IS NORTH OF 287 STATES SURROUNDING LAND USES YOU HAVE VT JAY ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE AIRPORT. HE'LL HAVE RESIDENTIAL AND UNDEVELOPED TO THE NORTH. TO THE SOUTH YOU HAVE AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AND PLANT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 83 OUT OF HERE AND DO YOU HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY THAT IS IN THE PROCESS OF BEING DEVELOPED WHICH IS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 136 AND P98 TO THE WEST. FOR A SINGLE-FAMILY USE AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL WITH THE AIRPORT AND VT JAY.

YOU CAN SEE THE LAND USE MAP HERE THE DIFFERENT ZONING DISTRICTS AND THIS IS THE FUTURE LAND USE LIKE I SAID THREE DIFFERENT LAND-USE CLASSIFICATIONS THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE LINE USED GOALS FOR THE AREA WHICH IS TO PROMOTE ATTRACTIVE AND SAFE -- SAFE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS AND TO PROTECT AND LEVERAGE ZONING CASES TO PROVIDE NEIGHBORHOOD AMENITIES AND SERVICES SO THIS IS WHAT THE ULTIMATE BRIDGEWATER WILL LOOK LIKE IF THIS IS APPROVED THIS IS A PHASE ONE THEY ARE NOT PROPOSING ANY CHANGES IN THIS GRAY AREA AND THIS IS THE AREA AS WELL.

[02:10:03]

DEVELOPMENT. >> YOU CAN SEE THE SIX TYPES OF RESIDENTIAL HOMES THEY VARY IN SIZE FROM 15,000 SQUARE FEET DOWN TO 4400 SQUARE FEET AND SIX LOT SIZES FOR THE SIX RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND THEY ARE PROPOSING AN INCREASE IN THE MAJORITY OF WHICH WILL BE EITHER TYPE THREE AND TYPE FOUR.

THAT IS WHERE THE MAJORITY, I'M SORRY TYPE OF NUMBER 4 AND NUMBER 5 WILL BE THE MAJORITY OF THE DEVELOPMENT WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING BRIDGEWATER.

PROPOSING TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF TOWNHOMES.

AND ADDING A MIXED-USE DISTRICT THAT WILL ADD MOTIVES FAMILIES AS WELL. AND THIS IS SHOWING THE AREA THAT WILL BE MIXED-USE DISTRICT. SO THIS WILL REACH ITS OWN RESIDENTIAL STANDARDS FOR WHAT IS ALLOWED.

THEY ARE PROPOSING A MAXIMUM 65,000 UNITS.

>> TOWNHOME AND MULTIFAMILY BUT THEY ARE REQUIRED TO BE 30,000 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES WITHIN THE MIXED-USE DISTRICT AND ALL NONRESIDENTIAL USES WITHIN THE MIXED-USE SUBDISTRICT HAS TO BE IN A GROUND-FLOOR RETAIL AND NO STAND-ALONE RETAIL WILL BE PERMITTED IN THE MIXED-USE DISTRICT. THEY DO HAVE ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS WITH A MINIMUM OF TWO FRONT ARTICULATION AND THREE ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS FROM THE ORDINANCE AND NO IDENTICAL ELEVATIONS WILL BE REPEATED WITH A FOUR ON THE SAME SIDE AND ONE DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET.

AND SO THEY DO HAVE DEVELOPMENT SIGNAGE.

I AM SHOWING THE ENTRY WAY OF FOR THE NEW AREA THAT IS ADJACENT TO THE COMMERCIAL MIXED-USE OPPORTUNITIES SEVEN AND IT WILL HAVE ENHANCED AND SO THIS IS THE SCREENING PLAN FOR PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AGAIN I READ OUT PHASE ONE SO YOU CAN SEE THEY ARE PLANNING SECONDARY SCREENING ALONG FOR THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS ALONG FOR THE AIRPORT AND THEY WILL HAVE SOME SCREENING ON THE GREEN SPACE AND THEY ARE PROPOSING AND SO THEY HAVE SOME SCREENING ALONG THIS RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT HERE THAT IS ADJACENT TO THERE AS WELL AND SO THIS IS THE AMENITY PROGRAMMING AND PHASE NUMBER 2. THEY WILL HAVE ONE REGIONAL TRAIL, THEY WILL HAVE ONE COMMUNITY PARK JUST THE RED ASTERISKS THEY WILL HAVE TWO PARKS AND THREE NEIGHBORHOOD PORTALS. AND POCKET COMMUNITY.

POCKET PARK. REQUIRED TO HAVE .75 ACRES THIS IS AN CORRIDOR THIS IS A POPULAR PART THIS IS A TRAILHEAD HERE AND THE COMMUNITY PARK IS REQUIRED TO HAVE MINIMUM TO ACRES ALL REQUIRED TO HAVE A WALKWAY BY WATER FOUNTAINS AND TRASH CANS AND AT LEAST TWO OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS OR NEIGHBORHOOD CORRIDORS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE AT LEAST THREE AND SO THIS IS SHOWING THE AMENITIES AROUND THE CURRENT COMMUNITY CENTER GOING INTO PHASE TWO WHICH INCLUDES A PAVILION RECREATION AREA AND SOME TRAILS.

SO THIS IS THE OPEN SPACE PLAN YOU CAN SEE THE TRAILER SYSTEM CONNECTS ALL OF BRIDGEWATER AND EVERY RESIDENTIAL UNIT DEVELOPMENT TYPE WILL HAVE ACCESS TO A TRAILER SYSTEM THE TRAIL NETWORK WITH THE DEVELOPMENT AND SO THIS IS SHOWING THE MASTER 30 FAIR PLAN YOU RECALL THE UPSIDE SICK OF HAYES ROAD THIS WAS INCLUDED THERE AS WELL WE DID SEND 26 POSTCARDS TO THE PROPERTY WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE PROPERTY AND THEY HAVE POSTED A SEVEN SIGNS IN THE AREA FOR THIS PROJECT.

NOTICE OF THE IN-BETWEEN CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS PUBLISHED LAST SATURDAY AND STAFF HAS RECEIVED NO OPPOSITION

[02:15:04]

WE ARE NOW ANSWERING QUESTIONS. >> CAN YOU PULL UP A MAP AND SHOW US THE SCHOOL DISTRICT LINES?

>> I CAN SHOW YOU ON THE ORIGINAL THIS RED LINE HERE SO THIS RED LINE HERE THIS IS... EYE IS THE THE AND THIS IS

MIDLOTHIAN ISD. >> I JUST WANT TO BE SURE THAT I AM UNDERSTANDING WHAT WE ARE LOOKING AT THE ORANGE SECTION IDENTIFIED THIS AS A MIXED-USE WILL HAVE 1100 DOORS.

>> UP TO 11 IT IS, THAT THAT. >> SO THOSE 1100 DOORS THOSE ARE ALL ISD? HAVE THEY BEEN MADE AWARE OF

THIS? >> YES, AND THEY ALSO PREVIOUSLY HAD A SCHOOL SITE WITHIN BRIDGEWATER AND THEY DECLINED TO HAVE THAT AND THAT SCHOOL SIDE THERE IS A REPORT -- PORTION OF

IT THAT IS BECOMING TOWN HALL. >> THEY DECLINED.

>> THEY REMOVE THIS. SO OF THIS 1800 NEW DOORS HOW MANY OF THOSE DOORS ARE IN MIDLOTHIAN VERSUS...

>> I DO NOT KNOW IF WE HAVE AN EXACT NUMBER OF THAT.

>> THIS RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT SO EVEN IF WE WERE TO KNOW WHERE THE LINE IS BY THE FAMILIES WITH MIDLOTHIAN ACCEPTING TRANSFERS.

THAT ANSWERS THE QUESTION. >> MY OTHER QUESTION IT IS IN THE PACKET IT TALKS ABOUT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS TRAFFIC IMPACT FOR IT WILL NOT GROW -- WALNUT GROVE IT SAYS TRAFFIC TO BE INSTALLED AT THE INTERSECTION OF WALNUT GROVE.

THAT IS KIND OF RIGHT ACROSS FROM STONEGATE, RIGHT?

>> NORTH OF IT. >> JUST A LITTLE BIT?

OKAY. >> WHO IS PAYING FOR THAT?

>> SO THE DEVELOPER WILL PAY FOR THAT TRAFFIC SIGNAL?

>> IT IS BEING DICTATED BY BECAUSE OF THE DEVELOPMENT.

>> OKAY AND IS THAT LIKE HOW DO WE HOW DO WE ENSURE THAT THEY PAY FOR IT AND THAT WE ARE NOT PAYING FOR IT?

>> TYPICALLY WE DO A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BECAUSE WHEN YOU DO ONE ANYWAYS FOR INTROS THAT IS RESOLVED TYPICALLY IN

DEVELOPMENT. >> OKAY THAT ALSO WILL ADDRESS THE ROOM? THE DEVELOPER WOULD BE AT THE

MINIMUM TWO LANES. >> CONSTRUCTED OF THE ULTIMATE

SECTION OF HAYES ROAD. >> SO THAT AGREEMENT THEY WILL CONSTRUCT THE ENTIRE ROADWAY THEY WILL NOT WANT TO DO HALF OF

THAT CONCRETE. >> WELL IT STARTED THERE SO THE ATTEND WOULD BE FOR THE DEVELOPERS TO BRING AND THE DEVELOPER WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MINIMUM OF TWO THINGS IN THE CITY IF THEY WENT ABOUT THE OTHER TWO OF THEM WE WOULD DO THAT OF A LIMIT AGREEMENT WHEREBY THERE BE SOME TYPE OF PARTICIPATION OF THE CITY TO BUILD THE TWO LINES TO GET TO

THE FOUR LIGHTS. >> OR YOU THINK MINIMUM TWO LANES? WE JUST SAID IT IS A MINOR

ARTERIAL. >> FROM A PROPORTIONALITY STANDPOINT AND LEFT THE DEVELOPMENT DICTATES THE USE OF FOUR LANES. SO NO DIFFERENT THAN WE DID WITH

[02:20:06]

OTHER DEVELOPMENTS. >> WE DO AN AGREEMENT WHEREBY

THEY BUILT OUT. >> MINIMUM TWO LANES.

WE WILL HAVE TRUCKS GOING DOWN HAYES ROAD.

>> CORRECT. AND CARS.

FOR 4000 HOMES. >> WHATEVER NUMBER THAT IS, CORRECT. [LAUGHTER]

>> I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND THE IMPACT.

>> ULTIMATELY THE IMPACT WILL BE UNTIL HAYES ROAD TYSON SOMEWHERE IT IS SERVING WITHIN THAT DEVELOPMENT ITSELF.

SO AGAIN INTEREST IN GETTING THIS CONSTRUCTED BETWEEN 287 AND 1387 FROM A NEED FOR RELIEF FROM WALNUT GROVE.

>> AND JUST NORTH OF THIS PROPERTY IS WAREHOUSE AND

OFFICE, CORRECT? >> AND RESIDENTIAL CORRECT.

>> AND THAT WAS HIGHLAND I BELIEVE?

>> YES, AND THEN ON AVISTA. >> THAT IS ANOTHER 2000 ODD

HOMES. >> NOT 2000 HOME.

>> THE TWO COMBINED? >> MAYBE A MAX OF 500 POSSIBLY.

>> HAYES CRESCENT IS WHAT? TWO, 300 RIGHT NOW.

>> THAT EXTENSION OF HAYES ROAD WOULD BE GAINING A POINT BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL THIS IS HOW IT IS

OWNED TO THE NORTH. >> OKAY ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR

MIKE WHILE HE IS. >> SPEAKING OF SCHOOLS I DO NOT RECALL WHAT IS THE PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL SCHOOLS.

THAT IS OUT OF OUR PURVIEW ON OUR PATH.

>> CURRENTLY OWNS THAT PROPERTY AND THE BLU-RAY THERE THE TIE IN IN THE MIDDLE THAT IS ACTUALLY SCHOOL PROPERTY SO THEY OWNED THAT AGAIN. EVEN THE OPTION OF HAVING THE SCHOOL SIGHT THEY CHOSE NOT TO TAKE IT SO IT IS NOT THERE ANYMORE AT THAT POINT. SO THIS IS WITHIN BRIDGEWATER.

>> ELEMENTARY? >> I THINK IT IS ELEMENTARY.

>> THANK YOU. >> I WOULD BE HAPPY TO COME BACK AS WELL IF ANYBODY NEEDS QUESTION.

>> THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF.

THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. HOWEVER, THE ONLY TWO FORMS I HAVE ARE FROM THE APPLICANTS. WE WILL PUT THOSE AWAY.

APPLICANT WOULD YOU LIKE TO COME.

AND THANK YOU FOR HANGING OUT WITH US TONIGHT.

YOU DID NOT KNOW WHAT YOU WERE GETTING INTO DID YOU?

>> YOU NEVER KNOW AT THESE THINGS.

[LAUGHTER] >> MY NAME IS BEN LUKEY FIRST OF ALL GOOD EVENING THINK YOU FOR HAVING US TONIGHT.

MY NAME IS BEN LUKEY WITH PROPERTY COMPANY 3001 LOCKE STREET IN DALLAS. WE ARE THE DEVELOPER OF BRIDGEWATER. AS YOU CAN SEE WE HAVE DONE TO PHASES SO FAR JUST DELIVER OUR SECOND PASTE THE FIRST SO ON THE GROUND RIGHT NOW IF THERE IS 950 LOTS ROUGHLY AMONG FIVE BUILDERS TRY POINT HOMES AND JOHN HOUSTON.

AND WHAT WE DELIVER IS THE SAME BUILDERS WE HAVE DONE EVERYTHING WE SAID WE WOULD DO AS FAR AS AMENITIES GO AND EVERYTHING ELSE TO CREATE THE ENVIRONMENT THAT WE ARE VERY PROUD OF.

WE ARE HERE TODAY BECAUSE WE ARE UNDER CONTRACT TO ACQUIRE 298 ACRES JUST NORTH OF OUR EAST PORTION SO I THINK WE WILL SHOW YOU HERE AND JUST A SECOND THAN HAVE THE PRESENTATION.

WE WANT TO INCORPORATE THIS SEALED TRACT INTO BRIDGEWATER AND JUST DO THE SAME THING THAT WE HAVE BEEN DOING WITH A DIFFERENT LOT SIZE IS THE ONLY THING THAT IS DIFFERENT NOW IS WE LOOK IN THE ZONING OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

THERE IS A MIXED-USE COMPONENT AND SO WE TALKED TO SOME COUNCIL PEOPLE AT THE WORKSHOP AND THINGS LIKE THAT ABOUT DOING IT DOWN HERE ON THE HIGHWAY. MOVING THE TOWNHOUSE A LITTLE BIT INTERNAL. SO WITH THAT PRODUCT I KNOW THERE WILL BE A LOT OF QUESTIONS ON THAT BUT TRYING TO APPRECIATE SOME PICTURES OF THAT WHERE WE DID THAT WITH 287 AND 360 ON THE CORNER OF THAT. IT WOULD BE A FOUR-STORY PRODUCT

[02:25:04]

FOR YOUR TIME. >> THANK YOU.

>> DESIGN A GROUP NORTH LAMAR STREET DALLAS, TEXAS,.

>> WE ARE THE LAND UPON HER ARCHITECT ON THIS SINCE BACK IN 2019 WHEN WE FIRST LIVED IN THE ORIGINAL BRIDGEWATER ZONING WITH MASTER ZONING OF THAT. SO A REAL HIGH-LEVEL INTRODUCTION WHAT WE ARE LOOKING AT DOING IS A BRIDGEWATER WAS DESIGNED WITH A LOT OF INTENT IF YOU DRIVE THROUGH WHAT IS ALREADY OUT THERE YOU SEE THE FRONT DOORS YOU SEE THE FRONT PORCH IS IN THE FRONT YARD. THE WHOLE PRINCIPLE IS THE AMENITIES THAT THEIR AFFAIRS EVERYTHING BUILT IN THE BRIDGEWATER COMMUNITY BASICALLY WANT TO TAKE THAT AND BUILD IN THIS ACREAGE AND ACCOMMODATE THE ADDITIONAL USE TO THE EAST OF THE AIRPORT AND THEN BASICALLY EXTEND THE LOOK AND THE DEAL EVERYTHING WE HAVE DONE AT BRIDGEWATER TODAY JUST AT THAT PROPERTY INTO SO LIKE IT WAS MENTIONED BASICALLY ENVISION ADDING THIS LAND INTO BRIDGEWATER WE ARE LOOKING AT SHIFTING THE TOWNHOMES THE TOWNHOMES JUST SHIFTING THE ORIGINAL LOCATION OF THAT BECAUSE OF THE REMOVAL AND THEN WE WILL TALK ABOUT COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USAGE AS WELL.

SO THIS IS HIGH LEVEL. IF YOU WANT TO TURN YOUR HEAD AND GET ACCLIMATED TO 287 OBVIOUSLY EVERYTHING IS TRYING TO SCREEN UP THERE RIGHT NOW THROUGH FACE NUMBER 2 WHICH ACTUALLY HAS THREE PHASES IN. YOU HAVE ALL THESE 900 HOMES THAT ARE EITHER PLANNED OR UNDER CONSTRUCTION.

ABOUT 450 HOMES FOR RESIDENT SOMEBODY OUT THERE EVERYTHING NOT BACK THIS IS THE ORIGINAL BRIDGEWATER ZONING PLACE SO YOU SEE ON THE RIGHT BRIDGEWATER HAS TWO CONNECTIONS, REALLY THREE ON WALNUT GROVE, THE LAND TO THE NORTH OF THIS LAND HERE ON THE NORTH IS ACTUALLY DISCONNECTED AND THERE IS 20-FOOT TRACT OF LAND BETWEEN THE TRACT. SO THAT IS SOMEWHAT OF AN ISOLATED PEACE. SO WE CALLED THIS REMAINING PEACE. WE HAVE PRESIDENTIAL PARKWAY THAT IS OUT THERE RIGHT NOW WE HAVE ANOTHER FUTURE EXTENSION CALLED THE GREENWAY ESPLANADE AND THEN THERE IS A THIRD CONNECTION ON 287 THAT IS JUST THE SOUTHEAST CORNER BY THE CHURCH. WE HAVE ONE CREEK CROSSING IF YOU HAVE BEEN OUT THERE THIS IS THE BEAUTIFUL CONSERVATION THAT IS OUT THERE THAT THE CREEK WEIGHT FLOWS DOWN AND CROSSES WE ORIGINALLY HAD JUST ONE CROSSING INTO THE PROJECT.

SO WE LOOKING AT THE RED PORTION OF THE PROPERTY HERE.

BASICALLY WRAPS AROUND THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BRIDGEWATER.

SO WHEN WE LOOK AT ZONING BASICALLY WHAT WE WANT TO DO IS GET A LOT OF TIME. WHEN WE GET AND DO THESE PROJECTS WHERE THEY TO DO SOMETHING SPECIAL.

SO THIS IS THE ENTRY FEATURE. SO THEY ZONING DOCUMENT THE IMAGE ON THE RIGHT IS WHAT IS BILLED.

>> WHEN WE DO THE ZONING CASES THE IDEAS WHAT WE ARE THINKING ABOUT THE LOOK IN THE FIELD AND EVERYTHING THAT IS WHAT GETS BUT ULTIMATELY I JUST A PRETTY PICTURE.

>> WE WANT TO TAKE WHAT IS ALREADY OUT A BIG SUCCESS AND JUST CONTINUE THAT TO THE ADDITIONAL LAND.

THIS IS AN EXAMPLE THAT WAS THE ZONING DOCUMENT THAT WE DID BACK IN 2020 HAD IN THE ENTRY CALVERT RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE THAT IS BUILT OUT THERE THE PHASE ONE AMENITY WAS THE OUTDOOR EVENT GATHERING SPACE AT THE PAVILION THAT WAS PART OF FACE NUMBER 1 AND THEN SOME VISIONS WE LOOKED AT EARLY ON BUT THE WHOLE GOAL IS WE WANT TO SHOWCASE THE FUTURE WE HAVE A LOT OF OPEN SPACE WE WANT PEOPLE TO ALSO JUST HAVE THE SENSE OF COMMUNITY SO WHEN YOU DRIVE THROUGH IT YOU SEE THE PEOPLE IN THE FRONT YARD YOU GET FAMILIAR WITH NEIGHBORS NOT JUST DRIVING THROUGH PARKING AND THE GARAGE AND THEN NOT TALKING TO ANYBODY IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD. CREATE THAT SENSE OF ENVIRONMENT WHICH HAS BEEN BUILT IN THE FIRST TWO PHASES FOR SOME OF THESE OTHER EXAMPLES. AND THEN ACTUALLY RIGHT NOW SO OBVIOUSLY WE THINK THE PROJECT IS A SUCCESS WHEN PEOPLE CHOOSE TO BUY HOMES THERE BUT ALSO WE ARE ADDING TO THE POPULATION BECAUSE WE HAVE PEOPLE PROPOSE TO EACH OTHER OUT THERE AT THE

[02:30:02]

SO WE'RE TRYING TRYING TO CREATE THAT ENVIRONMENT.

A SPACE WHERE PEOPLE FEEL COMFORTABLE AND EVEN ENJOY.

RIGHT NOW WE ARE BUILDING THE MAIN AMENITY CENTER THIS IS OUT ON THE LAKE IT IS STARTING CONSTRUCTION ANY DAY NOW.

IT IS SIGNIFICANTLY MORE THAN WAS REQUIRED IN THE ZONING SO I THINK THAT IS JUST A TESTAMENT OF THE DEDICATION OF THIS.

YOU MAY HAVE THE MAIN CLUBHOUSE AS WELL AS INTEGRATING INTO THE VIEWS TO THE LIKE AS WELL. SO THIS WILL BE THE AMENITY CENTER FOR EVERYBODY BRIDGEWATER.

>> COUPLE DESIGNS OF THE AMENITY CENTER.

BUT IT IS OVER $7 MILLION IN CONSTRUCTION SO THAT IS A BEAUTIFUL PIECE. WHILE WE ARE HERE IS FOLDING AND THE SEAL A PIECE SO WE WANT TO LOOK AT ONE OF THE NATURAL FEATURES ON THE PROJECT. SO EVERYTHING IN THE OUTLINE HERE OBVIOUSLY WE HAVE A LARGE CONSERVATION LAKE WE HAVE A CREEK THAT FLOWS THROUGH THIS. A GORGEOUS KIND OF ON THE EDGE OF BRIDGEWATER AND THAT GOES. THIS IS THAT COMMUNITY.

SO THAT CREEK WEIGHT JUST GET THE TREES.

THE PLAN IS TO TRY TO INTEGRATE THE OPEN SPACE.

>> WE WANT THE OPEN SPACES. >> A LOT OF THE FRONTS ON THE OPEN SPACE SO EVERYBODY GETS TO SEE IT IT IS PART OF THE COMMUNAL SPACE NOT JUST FOR PEOPLE BACK UP TO.

SO OBVIOUSLY WE HAVE TO DEAL WITH THE AIRPORT.

WHAT THIS DOES THIS IS KIND OF A NICE PIECE OF THE PUZZLE ON THE ALIGNMENT WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH STAFF ABOUT HOW THAT ALIGNMENT WOULD WORK BOTH TO THE NORTH WITH WHERE THEY HAVE THAT HOW WE FIT THAT IN WITH SOME OF THE EXISTING.

AND ULTIMATELY HOW DOES THE HAYES ALIGNMENT SHIFT NOW? DESIGN 287 WHICH WE WILL TALK ABOUT HERE IN A SECOND WHY WE SHOULD CONVERTED TO MIXED-USE WHEN WORKING WITH STAFF TO GET THAT ALIGNMENT IN HERE. BUT ALIGNMENT ALSO CREATES THAT NATURAL BUFFER FROM THE AIRPORT USES.

WHEN WE DESIGN THAT WE WANT TO USE THAT ROAD AS A TRANSITION POINT. SO THIS IS PROPOSED A NEW PLAN, RIGHT? IN THIS CORNER OF THE PROJECT.

WE ENLARGE THIS. >> A LOT OF INDUSTRIALS WILL PROBABLY BE SET UP CLOSER TO THE AIRPORT.

>> VALIDITY BACKER. >> WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO DO IS NOT JUST THE ONE CROSSING. ADDING TWO MORE CREEK CROSSINGS TO GO TO THE EAST SIDE OF THE CREEK ON THE WEST SIDE.

ALL THE WORK WE DID BACK IN 2020.

SAME LOT SIZES. LOOKING AT EXTENDING THE SAME PRODUCT EVENTUALLY WHICH YOU WILL SEE OUR ANYTHING FROM WE ARE NOT ADDING ANY MORE. KIND OF UNIQUE TO BRIDGEWATER.

60-FOOT, 70-FOOT, 80-FOOT LOTS. HERE IS THAT SCHOOL DISTRICT BOUNDARY LINE. THIS IS THE MIDLOTHIAN SITE THAT IS RIGHT ON THE SCHOOL PROPERTY. LOCATED OFF THE HEART OF THE PRESIDENTIAL PARKWAY. SO BOTH INTERNAL WITH ALL THE OPEN SPACE CONNECTIONS BUT ALSO SHOULD NOT BE NEEDED.

TO EXTRA CROSSINGS. ALL WE TRY TO CREATE THE SAME CHARACTER AS WE DRIVE THROUGH BRIDGEWATER IT IS ABOUT THE NEIGHBORHOODS IN THE OPEN SPACES AND THEY COME IN AREAS THAT ARE SHARED BY ALL OF THE RESIDENTS AND WE TURN OUR LOTS OF BACK WE DO HAVE REALLY LOOKING AT THOSE CROSSINGS TRIED TO HAVE THAT SINGLE FAMILY IN. WE HAD ABOUT 5'8" ACRES.

SINCE THAT THERE IS SCHEMATIC OF 287.

[02:35:08]

CREATE SOME BETTER TRANSITIONAL USE VERSUS THE TOWNHOMES BACK TO GUPTA THE HIGHWAY SO WE THOUGHT THAT WOULD BE OUT GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO SHIFT THAT IN. FORMALLY PROPOSED AND NOT NEEDED NOW. WHAT WE LOOKED AT HERE WAS WE HAD A COUPLE WORKSHOPS WITH COUNCIL MULTIPLE MEETINGS WITH STAFF WAS HOW WE COULD INTEGRATE THIS COMMERCIAL USED TO BE SOMETHING A LITTLE BIT MORE DESTINATION WHERE YOU NEED RIGHT NOW JUST 5 ACRES OF COMMERCIAL HERE REALLY HAD SOME LIMITED VALUE. SO THE IDEA IS HOW TO CREATE THIS MIXED-USE OPPORTUNITY WITH SOME OF THE SUCCESSES THEY JUST REFERENCE THE PROJECT SO SOME OF THE SUCCESSES CREATING THIS MIXED-USE WORKING WITH STAFF. WORKING WITH SOME DESIGN PRINCIPLES YOU ALL HAVE BEEN DISCUSSING AND PUTTING THAT INTO THE PLAN HERE. SO THAT IS WITH THAT IDEA IS FOR THE MIXED-USE PEACE. YOU KNOW WHEN WE DID THIS OBVIOUSLY WE TRIED TO BLUR THE LINE WHERE BRIDGEWATER AND THE SEALED PEACE ARE SO ALL OF THOSE ROADS THE THOROUGHFARE PLANS.

BASICALLY JUST UPDATED. NOT CHANGE IN ANY OF THE SCREENING STANDARDS. BLURS THE LINE FROM THE ORIGINAL BRIDGEWATER. SO WHEN WE COMPARE THIS WHAT WE LOOK AT IS A 298 ACRES SOME OF BRIDGEWATER.

SEVEN -- THE TOWNHOUSE WENT FROM EIGHT UNITS TO ACRE TO 12 UNITS PER ACRE. THE IDEA IS THAT SITE IS NOW SITUATED ON OPEN SPACE. TOWNHOMES.

AND THEN THE REST WERE SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS.

MIXED-USE JUST LOOKING AT 35 GROSS ACRES.

WHICH IS WHAT WE GENERALLY VIEW ON THESE OTHER EXAMPLES.

TYPICALLY UP TO 70%. SO THAT IS JUST 1065 LEAD TO THE GROSS ACREAGE THAT WE HAVE HERE. THIS IS JUST AN EXAMPLE THIS IS IS IF YOU DRIVE UP TO 87 REFERENCE ANGLE.

SO THIS IS RIGHT OFF TO. THIS IS NOT MULTIFAMILY WHERE IT IS LIKE GARDEN STYLE YOU PARK AND THERE IS BUILDINGS LIKE THREE-STORY BACK-TO-BACK. HIGHLY MIXED-USE PRINCIPLES.

SCHIFF THE BUILDINGS OFF TO THE STREET SO YOU HAVE VERY STRONG STREET STAGE OF PEDESTRIAN SPACE PEOPLE CAN WALK THERE AND WALK RIGHT UP TO THEIR UNIT AND WALK UP TO THE RETAILER.

AND IN THE BACK THERE WOULD BE THE SURFACE PARKING IN THE BACK THERE IS NO PARKING GARAGE OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.

THIS IS WHERE YOU HAVE SOME OF THE UNITS FRONTING THE STREET SO YOU CAN DRIVE UP THERE AND SEE THAT.

THE SAME THING FEATURES THE BRANDING STANDARDS.

THE MAJORITY -- THE IDEA IS THE MAJORITY WOULD BE TUCKED BEHIND SURFACE PARKING LOTS. IDEA IS MORE OF A STREETSCAPE THAT HAS MORE OF A MIXED-USE FEEL.

THIS IS A FRAMEWORK PLAN WE INCLUDED IN THE ZONING SO NORTH IS. THIS IS THE GREENWAY ESPLANADE THIS IS THE OLD WI ST SIDE SO WE HAVE EXISTING UTILITIES IN THEIR AND THEN THIS WAS THE SIDE WE TALKED ABOUT JUST SOUTH OF US SO THAT OFF-RAMP THAT IS HAPPENING ABOUT RIGHT HERE THAT IS WHY WE HAVE SHIFTED THIS ROAD TO CUT THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF THE MIXED-USE AND COMMERCIAL OPPORTUNITIES.

SO FRAMEWORK PLANS AND STARTED TO LAY OUT YOU KNOW SHIFTING THE BUILDINGS TO THE EDGE. AND THEN THESE WOULD BE MORE OF YOUR INTERNAL PRIMARY DRIVES A NICE 20-FOOT BUILDING SETBACK LANDSCAPING JUST LIKE WHAT THEY SHOWED YOU SO THE THREE RED

[02:40:03]

THE GROUND FLOOR OF THESE UNITS THAT DO NOT HAVE RETAIL SO YOU WOULD NOT BE SEEING YOUR GARAGES FROM KIND OF PRIMARY ENTRY DRIVE WHAT YOU WOULD BE SEEING IS THE NICE STREET CHASE BUT WE FEEL THIS ALLOWS US TO MAYBE CAPTURE IT A LITTLE BIT BETTER THAN JUST A STAND-ALONE COMMERCIAL THAT WE HAVE HERE BUT ALSO THEN IT SHIFTING TOWNHOMES WHICH WERE HERE BEFORE SERVES AS A LOT BETTER TRANSITIONAL USE FROM THE HIGHWAY INTO THE PROJECT AND MORE SINGLE-FAMILY USES. SO KEPT IT AT 50 FEET IN HEIGHT MINIMUM 30,000 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL SOMEWHERE WITHIN THE RED ZONES AND THIS IS JUST A SPATIAL ANALYSIS WE HAVE BUILT THIS WHAT DOES A FOUR-STORY 50 FEET EVEN MEAN AND SO IF YOU WERE DRIVING DOWN THE HIGHWAY THIS IS THE SCALE OF YOU KNOW GROUND-FLOOR RETAIL USUALLY THOSE KIND OF WORK WITH ARCHITECTURALLY HIRE CEILING AND THEN THREE FLOORS OF MULTIFAMILY USE SO THE YELLOW LAYERS OF THOSE WOULD BE MULTIFAMILY.

THE RED WOULD BE POTENTIAL COMMERCIAL GROUND USES.

SO JUST WANT TO KIND OF HELP VISUALIZE THIS IS LIKE THE COMMERCIAL TREND THAT WE ARE NOT CHANGING.

NORTH OF THE GREENWAY ESPLANADE SO ALL IN ALL WHAT WE LOOKED AT WAS THE DENSITIES AND THE FOCUS AS WELL IT WITH OF THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS SINGLE-FAMILY TOWNHOMES MIXED-USE PER ACRE WANTED TO SUMMARIZE THAT AND HOW THAT HAD 120 ACRES OF FLOOD PLAN ON THE PROPERTY. VALUE SO ORIGINALLY WE DO THE BRIDGEWATER ZONING. IT WAS ESTIMATED AT ABOUT 750 E-$900 MILLION IN VALUE. ONCE A FACE NUMBER 2 IS A BUILT IN 967 LOTS ESTIMATE THE VALUE IS ABOUT 500 MILLION.

>> THE DEAL THAT WE HAVE TONIGHT.

ONE POINT $7 BILLION. >> AND SUMMARY WHAT WE ARE LOOKING FOR IS BASICALLY TAKING BRIDGEWATER PD ADDING SOAP PROPERTY AND KEEPING SAME AMENITY STANDARDS EVERYTHING BACK IN THE ORIGINAL ZONING AND JUST TAKING THAT PERIOD THROUGH THAT WORKS AND SO FORTH AND AND THEN ALSO WORKING WITH CITY COUNCIL AND CITY STAFF ON THE EXPANSION OF THE MMD AS WELL SO ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THIS IT IS A LOT TO DIGEST BUT WANTED TO KIND OF REMIND YOU ALL OF WHAT WE HAVE DONE UP UNTIL NOW.

>> SO I AM LOOKING AT THIS PICTURE CAN YOU USE THE MOUSE

AND POINT TO THE RETAIL? >> THIS IS A REALLY SENSITIVE

MOUSE. >> THIS CORNER RIGHT HERE.

>> JUST THAT CORNER. THIS IS PHASE ONE OF THE PROJECT, PHASE TWO IS ACTUALLY JUST RIGHT HERE AS WELL AND THEN THIS IS A STAND-ALONE COMMERCIAL OFFICE THIS IS INTENDED FOR

RESTAURANTS AS WELL. >> THIS APPEARS TO BE A LUXURY APARTMENT COMPLEX AND HOW MANY RETAILS ARE ACTUALLY OPEN AND OPERATING RIGHT NOW TODAY? SO THERE IS ACTUALLY NO RETAILER. THERE IS SPACE FOR RETAIL BUT THERE IS NO ACTIVE RETAIL AND THE SPACES THAT YOU HAVE AVAILABLE OUR HOW MANY ON THE LEASE? TWO SPACES? SO ONLY ON THE ONE CORNER.

AND IDEALLY THAT WOULD BE WHAT? COFFEE SHOP, BOUTIQUE OKAY SO WE

[02:45:05]

>> YES, IT DOES HAVE APARTMENTS ABOVE IT BUT WHAT WE ARE SEEING BECAUSE WE ARE DEDICATING 30,000 SQUARE FEET NOT 9000 SQUARE FEET TO BE COMMERCIAL SPACE WHETHER IT BE A REALTOR OFFICE OR A TITLE OFFICE RESTAURANT, THE THING ABOUT THESE MIXED-USE AND THIS CAME FROM STAFF AS WELL IS THAT IN THE FIRST PHASE THERE IS NOT A WHOLE LOT OF PEOPLE SUPPORTING RETAIL SO THERE'S ONLY HAS 300 UNITS. OVERALL THIS IS GOING TO BE 1500 UNIT SO AS TO HAVE MORE DENSITY AND MORE AS YOU CAN SEE HERE SOMEBODY WAS KIND OF CRAZY TO GO BEHIND IT YOU WILL CREATE THE DEMAND WHERE THE RETAIL HAS MORE OPPORTUNITY.

BUT WITH 300 UNITS IT IS VERY DIFFICULT FOR SOME USE FOR JUST 300 RESIDENTS. SO OVER TIME IT WILL HAPPEN IT

IS JUST IN THE FIRST PHASE. >> YOU MENTIONED RETAIL BY 5000 SQUARE FEET THOSE 300 UNITS OF EQUATE TO WHAT?

>> THEY RANGE FROM I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IS WITH A RANGE ANYWHERE FROM ONE BEDROOM TO THREE BEDROOMS.

>> WHAT WOULD YOU SAY IS THE RATIO OF RETAIL TO APARTMENTS

FACE? >> I AM NOT QUITE UNDERSTANDING.

>> SO IF THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT IS 100,000 SQUARE FEET AND THE RETAIL WAS A 5000 IT WOULD BE HALF PERCENT?

>> OR YOU TALKING ABOUT SQUARE FOOTAGE.

BECAUSE I DO NOT KNOW HOW MANY SQUARE FOOTAGE OF RESIDENTIAL THAT IS. THEY TALK ABOUT NUMBER OF UNITS AND DEPARTMENTS BUT WHAT YOU WERE ALSO NOT TALKING ABOUT IS OVER HERE IN THIS CORNER I WILL USE THE MOUSE ALL OF THIS IS COMMERCIAL AND THIS IS ABOUT 6 ACRES IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE THREE OR FOUR STORIES OF OFFICE AND RETAIL.

SO THE WHOLE THING WILL BE CALL IT I SAY ABOUT 1500 UNITS AND PROBABLY ABOUT 150,000 SQUARE FEET OR COMMERCIAL.

>> IN THE CITY OF GRANDE PRAIRIE >> IN THE CITY OF GRANDE

PRAIRIE. >> GOING BACK TO THE SITE PLAN YOU JUST SHOWED US IT APPEARED THERE WERE 16 BUILDINGS AND ONLY THREE OF THOSE 16 HAVE RETAILER. THE OTHER 13 ARE JUST DEPARTMENT

BUILDING. >> CORRECT.

>> 10 ACRES OF COMMERCIAL. >> OVER HEAR SO IF YOU GO BACK THERE YOU GO. SO THIS IS MORE THAN 10 ACRES

ACTUALLY 15. >> 15 ACRES COMMERCIAL HERE.

>> THIS WILL ACQUAINT OVER 150,000 SQUARE FEET OF POSSIBILITY TOWN. ANOTHER 30,000 FEET A FIRST FLOOR RETAIL BELOW THE RESIDENTS.

>> I FEEL LIKE WE ARE COMING AT MIXED-USE WHEN REALLY WE SHOULD BECOME A GOOD APARTMENT COMPLEX WITH SOME RETAIL.

>> I'M JUST GOING BY WHAT YOUR STAFF TOLD US TO CALL.

>> ANY QUESTIONS. NO? WE WANT TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING? DO WE HAVE A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR OF CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING. THAT IS 5-0.

PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF? ANY DISCUSSION OF OPPONENTS? I WILL SAY I WAS A LITTLE BIT SHOCKED WHEN I READ THIS PARTICULAR ITEM. THAT WE WERE INCREASING $1800 AND I REALLY AM CONCERNED WITH THIS MASSIVE APARTMENT COMPLEX RIGHT ON THE HIGHWAY I DO KNOW WE HAVE A SERIOUS NEED FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING BUT WHAT I AM SEEING CAN THE APARTMENT COMPLEX LATELY IS THAT THEY ARE ALL HIGH AND LUXURY EXPENSIVE APARTMENTS AND THAT IS NOT SOLVING OUR HOUSING CRISIS.

SO THAT IS WHAT I NEED TO SAY THERE.

IS THERE MOTION? >> I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO

APPROVE. >> WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE AS PRESENTED. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? WE HAVE A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? THAT IS 4-2-1. DID NOT SAY THAT I AM NEGATIVE.

[013 Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to amend the development and use of 44.80+ acres out of the R. Berry Survey Abstract No. 42 by changing the zoning from Agricultural (A) District to Planned Development District No. 169 (PD-169) and amending the development regulations of PD-169 by amending the Concept Plan, Elevations, and Landscape Plan. The property is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of VV Jones Road and Old VV Jones Road. (Z07-2026-012)]

[02:50:03]

SO IT PASSES 4-1. >> OUR NEXT ITEM IS ITEM 13 ALL RIGHT. I WILL READ THIS AS QUICKLY AS I CAN. CONDUCTING THE PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERING THE REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT USE OF 44.80 ACRES. ABSTRACT NUMBER 42 BY CHANGING THE ZONING FROM AGRICULTURE LETTER A DISTRICT OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 169 AND DEMANDING TO DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE PD-169 BY AMENDING THE CONCEPT PLAN, ELEVATION'S, AND LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF VV JONES ROAD AND OLD VV JONES ROAD. AND COMMISSIONER ALTMAN HAS RECUSED HIMSELF SO WE STILL HAVE FOUR PEOPLE HERE TO HERE THE

STAFF. >> SENIOR PLANNER TO PRESENT ITEM 13 THIS IS A REQUEST TO REZONE AND AMEND PD 169 LANDSCAPE AND ELEVATION PLAN FOR DISTRIBUTION CENTER AND OUTDOOR STORAGE ON A 44.80 LOT DESIGNATED AS INDUSTRIAL MODULE IN THE PLAN. THIS SLIDE SHOWS THE PROPERTY OUTLINED IN YELLOW AND THE ADJACENT TO THE ZONING LAND USES AND FUTURE LAND USE IS ON THE BOTTOM LEFT TABLE.

HERE IS PROPOSED TO DETAILED SITE PLAN FOR THE ENCORE FACILITY DEVELOPMENT INCLUDES 137,000, 760 SQUARE FOR DISTRIBUTION CENTER AND OUTDOOR STORAGE IN THIS AREA WITH ROUGHLY 43,000 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE SPACE AND 95,000 SQUARE FEET OF WAREHOUSE SPACE. THIS WILL SERVE AS AN ADDITIONAL FACILITY FOR ENCORE MEASUREMENT SERVICES WITHIN THE EXISTING FUND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING ENCORE DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSE HERE'S A LANDSCAPE PLAN WHICH REQUIRES NO VARIANCES AS WELL AS THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.

THE PROPERTY WAS ANNEXED IN 1999 THE SITE IS NEAR JONES ROAD SHOWS THE PLAN IS A PROPOSED MAJOR ARTERIAL WITH THE COPY ANSWER OF GOALS AND STRATEGY AND POLICY THE PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH FOR SUPPORTING ATTRACTING AND RETAINING OR RETAINING HIGH-PAYING OPPORTUNITIES AND ENCOURAGING BALANCE OF LAND USES THAT EXPAND WITH JOB OPPORTUNITIES.

NOTICES WERE MAILED OUT TO PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN A CERTAIN RADIUS OF THE PROPERTY. SIGN WAS PLACED FOR THE PROPERTY FOR THE CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING PUBLISHED IN THE NEWSPAPER THERE'S NO OBJECTIONS FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.

[INDISCERNIBLE]. WE OPEN UP QUESTIONS.

>> HAS THE SECTION OF JONES BEEN AMENDED?

[INAUDIBLE] >> HELLO MY NAME IS JACK WHITLEY WITH KINLEY HORN THE ENGINEER OUT OF FRISCO.

THE SITE IS PROPOSED BY ENCORE TO CREATE MORE OFFICE SPACE INDOOR AND OUTDOOR STORAGE TO ACCOMMODATE THEIR TRAINING AND TESTING FOR THEIR OPERATIONS IN THIS AREA.

STAFF HAS ASKED THIS TO BE ADOPTED INTO THE NEAR BE PD A RESILIENCE TO THE SOUTH AND WE ARE NOT REQUESTING ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE STANDARD. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

>> HAS EVER IN A TIA DONE ON THIS?

>> THERE HAS. IT WAS NOT FOUND TO PROVIDE THE SITE TO NEED IMPROVEMENTS TO ANY OF THE EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE ALTHOUGH WITH ANY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT WHICH MAY HAPPEN TO THE EAST, DISCUSSION HAD GATHERED THERE WOULD BE A TURNING LANE SOUTHBOUND, I WRITE TURNING LANE SOUTHBOUND TO THE

FUTURE. >> WILL THIS BE RETAINED BY

[02:55:01]

ENCORE FOR ENCORE USAGE. >> THE OTHER ONE IS LEAST, BUT

THIS ONE WOULD BE ENCORE OWNED. >> IS ANY ISSUE WITH THE CURRENT HIGHWAY SECTION THERE ON THE SITE, OR AS WOULD MIKE WAS

TALKING ABOUT. >> THERE IS CURRENT ISSUES, BUT THAT WOULD NOT BE CAUSED BY LIKE IMPROVEMENTS NOT BECAUSE BY THE PROJECT, BUT, YES,, THE TIA DID RECOMMEND THE CITY WOULD IMPROVE

THAT INTERSECTION. >> THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING BUT WE DO NOT HAVE ANYONE SIGN UP TO SPEAK.

SO WITH THAT. >> WE PROPOSE TO CLOSE THE

PUBLIC HEARING. >> WE HAVE A SECOND.

ALL IN FAVOR OF CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING PASSES FOUR-ZERO.

PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED. THEN HE REMAINING OF STAFF? OKAY, DO WE HAVE A MOTION? WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE AS PRESENTED AND A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR?

IT PASSES 4-0. >> BEFORE WE GO TO THE NEXT ONE.

ARE YOU FAMILIAR WHEN YOU EXPANDED YOUR POWER OR SUBSTATION FROM THE NINTH UNTIL THE 15TH OKAY.

THAT'S ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.

>> OKAY. I THINK WE ARE WAITING ON COMMISSIONER ALTMAN TO WALK

BACK INTO THE ROOM AND JOIN US. >> RIGHT NOW YOU'RE MISSING THOUGHTLESS YOU DO NOT HAVE QUORUM RIGHT NOW.

[LAUGHTER] >> WELCOME BACK, GENTLEMEN.

WHAT WILL BE OUR FINAL PUBLIC HEARING OF THE NIGHT.

[014 Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to amend the development and use regulations of a 7.632+ acre portion of Planned Development District No. 179 (PD-179) by adopting a Detailed Site Plan. The property is generally located northwest of US Highway 287/US Highway 67 Loop and northeast of US Highway 287. (Z08-2026-014)]

IT'S AFTER 9:00 AND I GET TIRED. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST TO AMEND OF ELEMENT AND USE REGULATIONS OF A 7.632 PORTION OF ACREAGE VELTMAN FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NUMBER 1 HUNTED 79 BY ADOPTING A DETAILED SITE PLAN.

THE PROPERTY IS GENERALLY LOCATED NORTHWEST OF US HIGHWAY 287/US HIGHWAY 67 LOOP AND NORTHEAST OF US HIGHWAY 287

DECAY. >> MARIAN SPENCER AGAIN.

THE NEXT ITEM IS AN AMENDMENT TO PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 179.

THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AS YOU SAID.

THE NORTHWEST OF US HIGHWAY 287/US HIGHWAY 67 LOOP AND NORTHEAST OF US HIGHWAY 287. IF YOU RECALL, IT IS A PORTION GUARDING OUR FUTURE MIDLOTHIAN HAS THE PROPERTY AS AN ORIGINAL MODULE WHICH REQUIRES AN URBAN STYLE MIX COMMERCIAL AREA LONG ARTERIAL AND REGIONAL THOROUGHFARES.

THIS PROPERTY IS A COMPONENT OF THE OVERALL CRESTVIEW TRACT WHICH IS ALL OF THIS AREA HERE, WHICH IS BOUND BY MAIN STREET ON THE NORTH, U.S. HIGHWAY 67 ON THE EAST AND THE SOUTH IN THE LOOP AND OF COURSE 287 ON THE SOUTHWEST.

TO THE NORTH, IT'S COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.

TO THE EAST, IT IS PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 171 WHICH WE HEARD OF EARLIER. TO THE SOUTH, WE HAVE OF COURSE IT IS UNDEVELOPED AROUND IN HERE.

BUT IT'S ALSO -- I'M SORRY, MY APOLOGIES.

AND THEN REPORTS TO THE SOUTH -- SOUTHWEST, YOU HAVE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 179. GOING BACKWARDS.

SO THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE CENTRAL PORTION OF THIS PD, AND THEY ARE PROPOSING TO ELIMINATE FIVE RETAIL LOTS TO CREATE ONE PLACE OF WORSHIP BLOCKED.

THEY ARE PROPOSING A 41,105 SQUARE-FOOT PLACE OF WORSHIP.

235 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED. THEY ARE PROVIDING 394, 116 OF WHICH ARE COMPACT SPACES INTO HUNDRED 78 REGULAR SPACES AND TEN ARE HANDICAPPED. THEY ARE REQUESTING OTTAWA VARIANCES. THE FIRST BEING THAT PARKING IS EXCEEDING 125% MAXIMUM AND ELEVATIONS ARE NOT IN THE.

[03:00:07]

SOON THE FIRST VARIANCE, WE LOOKED AT PLACES OF WORSHIP AROUND TOWN THAT WERE OVER 30,000 SQUARE FEET AND WITH A NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES, THE REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THOSE LARGER PLACES OF WORSHIP SO FURTHER ELEVATIONS WE HAVE FRONTAGES ON THREE SIDES, WITCHES THE TOP FEW ELEVATIONS, BUT ON THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY WHICH IS THIS ELEVATION ALONG HERE, AND THIS ELEVATION HERE WHICH IS THESE TWO ELEVATIONS, THAT THEY DO HAVE FRONTS LIKE CANOPIES AND WHAT YOU WOULD SEE ON THE FRONT SIDE SO YOU DO NOT HAVE FULL 360 ARCHITECTURE.

THEY DO MEET OUR MASONRY REQUIREMENT AND PUTTING ARTICULATION FOR HORIZONTAL BAR TO CHELATION FOR THE CITY CODE.

BUT FOR THE FLAT ROOF, YOU DON'T QUITE COVER THEIR EQUIPMENT SO THEY WOULD NEED TO RAISE THEIR SCRUTINY SO THEY DO COVER IT -- SORRY, THEY DO COVER THEIR SCREENING WITH ADDITIONAL MATERIAL HERE. THEY DO HAVE SOME OLD TOWN ELEMENTS. THEY DO HAVE CANOPIES ON SOME OF THE SECOND-STORY WINDOWS YOU CAN SEE ON THIS FACADE HERE.

THEY DO HAVE A CANOPY OVER THE FRONT ENTRANCE HERE.

THEY DO HAVE VERY BIG PICTURES. YOU SO HAVE SOME -- YOU HAVE SOME LOWER AND HIGHER. THEY DO HAVE SOME DISPLAY WINDOWS SHOWN ON ALL SIDES. AND THEY DO HAVE SOME.

[INAUDIBLE] WINDOWS HERE.

SO THERE ARCHITECTURE OVERALL IS MORE INDUSTRIAL STYLE.

AND SO THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE FOLLOWING LAND POLICY TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INTO OUR HUMAN RESOURCES TALENT AND THE AMENDMENT VARIANCES ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE GOAL TO FOCUS AS IMPORTANT ENTRIES INTO THE COMMUNITY AND FOR THE IMPRESSION THEY LEAVE ON RESIDENTS AND VISITORS AND TO ENHANCE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ALONG THE WAY. WE DID SEND OUT POSTCARDS TO PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET. THAT TWO SIDES ON THE PROPERTY ONE ON THIS AND ONE HERE. THE NOTICE OF THE MAY 12TH 2026 COUNCIL HEARING WILL BE PUBLISHED IN MIDDLE THE YEAR ON APRIL 25TH. WE HAVE RECEIVED NO CORRESPONDENCE FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, BUT WE DO RECOMMEND TO PD 179 AS WELL AS THE USE WAS CONSISTENT WITH THE CONFERENCE DOORSTOP ANSWER PLAN FUTURE LAND USE PLAN THE ADJACENT ZONING AND USES WE HAD CONCERNS WITH THE PARTIAL CONSISTENCY FOR THE

POLICIES FOR WINDOWS. >> THANK YOU.

ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF? OKAY, APPLICANT.

THERE THE LAST MAN STANDING. >> GOOD EVENING CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS. AND BRETT HARRINGTON I DO REAL STATE OF ELEMENT FOR MY CHURCH BASED OUT OF KELOWNA CITY.

AT ADDRESS 4600 EAST SECOND STREET AND WANT TO THANK YOU FOR LETTING ME BE HERE TONIGHT AND HOPEFULLY WE CAN LIVE UP TO THE FINALE. AS YOU HEARD FROM MIRIAN SPENCER THERE'S A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT VARIANTS ON THE TABLE AND IT'S WORTH NOTING THAT MY CHURCH AS 46 CAMPUSES IN 12 STATES THIS WOULD BE OUR FIFTH IN THE DFW [INDISCERNIBLE] AND WE ARE VERY EXCITED TO BE A PART OF THIS AND WE ARE EVEN MORE HONORED TO BE ON THE MAIN STREET ENTRY COMING IN ON THE WEST PORTION OF YOUR DOWNTOWN AREA RECOGNIZE WHAT THAT MEANS WHAT THAT SAYS ABOUT THE CITY ITSELF AND WE DON'T TAKE THAT LIGHTLY.

SO AS WE LOOK AT THE VARIANCES, I WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE A BIT OF CONTEXT. SPEAKING TO THE PARKING, WITH DATA FROM ALL OF OUR CAMPUSES IT DETERMINES HOW MANY PARKING SPOTS WE NEED IN ORDER TO FUNCTION BASED OFF OF AUDITORIUM CAPACITY THAT DOES MATCH UP IN THE PARKING PERIOD TO MATCH UP WITH OTHER PERIODS OF HER SIZE. IN ADDITION TO THAT THE WAY WE OPERATE WE HAVE SERVICES ONLY 3O ACCOMMODATING PEOPLE WHO ARE IN THE SERVICE WE HAVE NOT LEFT WHEN THE NEXT SERVICE ARE SHOWING UP. SO WE HAVE TO MANAGE THAT

[03:05:02]

SO WE DID THE PARKING VARIANCE AND WE CAME UP WITH WHAT WE BELIEVE IS A CREDIBLE CASE FOR ANY ADDITIONAL PARKING AND THEN SPECIFIC TO THE ELEVATIONS, INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, WE WERE PLANNING TO BE IN FRONT OF YOU LAST MONTH AT THE AGENDA.

AND WE HAD READ THE PD 179 AND IN SECTION E10H, WE ACTUALLY INTERPRETED THAT SECTION TO INTERPRET THAT WE HAS OVER 20,000 SQUARE FEET NOT HAVE TO ABIDE BY THE OLD TOWN ARCHITECTURE SO WE WERE PLANNING TO GO IN WITH JUST OUR NORMAL BUILDING THINKING THAT WAS ACCEPTABLE BUT THE MORE WE HEARD AND LEARNED ABOUT THE INTENT OF THE ARCHITECTURE WE ACTUALLY TOOK OURSELVES OFF THE AGENDA AND SAID WE WANT TO TAKE A SHOT.

WE WANT TO GIVE OUR BEST ATTEMPT TO INTERPRET OLD TOWN ARCHITECTURE ON A SINGLE TENANT BUILDING OF THAT SIZE WHICH IS NOT EASY BECAUSE IT IS SUBJECTIVE AND HARD TO DO WITHOUT CREATING A WEIRD CONDITION WHERE SINGLE USER LIKE DOZENS OF SMALL ONES AND SO WHAT YOU SEE IS OUR EFFORT AFTER PAYING ATTENTION TO WHAT HAPPENED ON THE WEBBER DEVELOPMENT AND WHAT HAPPENED WITHIN OUR OWN DEVELOPMENT AND DIFFERENT CITY MEETINGS, WE HAVE WATCH THOSE, WE HAVE TRIED TO INTERPRET THAT AS BEST WE CAN GOING BACK TO ADAM HORIZONTAL VERTICAL APPLICATION, WARNINGS, WINNINGS, MATERIALITY, ALL THE DIFFERENT THINGS WE SEE ON THEIR WE HAVE ATTEMPTED TO DO TO BRING THAT FEELING SMALLER STRUCTURES BREAKING UP BIG WALLS INTO SMALLER BUILDINGS. SO THAT WAS OUR HOPE OF WHAT WE SEE HERE BUT IT'S PRESENTED AS A VARIANTS WE ARE EXCELLENT FULLY ON BOARD WITH THE INVASION OF THE OLD TOWN ARCHITECTURE.

WE ATTEMPT TO ABIDE BY IT TO THE FULLEST EXTENT WE CAN WITH THE EXTENT WAS A SINGLE TENANT BUILDING SO WE LOOKED AT THOSE AND TRY TO INTERPRET THAT BUT ALSO MAKE IT BETTER BY ADDING ADDITIONAL ELEMENTS THE BUILDING DID NOT HAVE SO THAT'S A HEART BEHIND IT. WE ARE FULLY AND FAVE OF THE OLD TOWN ARCHITECTURE. IT'S JUST AN INTERESTING STANCE TO TRY AND INTERPRET IT FOR A BUILDING.

WE APPRECIATE YOU GUYS HEARING OUR CASE TONIGHT AND HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS ALSO HAVE OUR CIVIL ENGINEER WITH ME AS WELL

FOR THOSE QUESTIONS. >> I HAVE A QUESTION, WHY THAT

LOCATION? >> GREAT QUESTION.

ANY BUSINESS LOCATES ITSELF IN A SPOT THAT COULD BE MOST PROFITABLE. FOR A CHURCH THAT'S A VERY DIFFERENT ARGUMENT BECAUSE WE ARE NOT TRYING TO BE PROFITABLE, WE ARE ACTUALLY THERE TO SERVE THE COMMUNITY BUT IT'S THE SAME MIND-SET THAT VISIBILITY MATTERS.

PROXIMITY MATTERS. FOR WHERE THE HUB OF THE COMMUNITY MATTERS SO WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO DO IS CHANGE LIVES IN EVERY RESPECT. YES FOR EVERY OPPORTUNITY BUT EVEN JUST HEALING MARRIAGES. AND PARENTING RELATIONSHIPS.

WHATEVER PERSON MIGHT NEED FOR THE COMMUNITY TO BE STRONG WE WANT TO BE IN THE BEST POSSIBLE POSITION TO AFFECT THOSE TO DO THAT WHICH IS WHY WE LOOK IN THIS LOCATION SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE IT HAS THE FRONT DOOR FOR THE COMMUNITY FOR SO MANY DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS FOR THE CITIZENS.

>> THANK YOU. >> LET ME ASK YOU THE THING THAT SORT OF SCARES ME IS A PRIME LOCATION THAT TEN OR 15 HOURS A WEEK IT WOULD BE A PARKING LOT. SO YOU -- DO SHARE, COMING TO ANY OF YOUR OTHER LOCATIONS SHARE WITH THE SHOPPING CENTER BECAUSE PEOPLE WILL BE COMING OUT OF CHURCH WHILE PEOPLE ARE BUYING THINGS AT HOME DEPOT OR SOMETHING.

>> IN TERMS OF SHARING PARKING IN THE SAME IN THE SAME DEVELOPMENT. IF YOU'RE ASKING RENT OTHER DEVELOPERS THAT ARE RETAIL BASED WE ARE ADJACENT HOME DEPOT AND AUSTIN. WE ARE ADJACENT TO LOWE'S ELSEWHERE. [INDISCERNIBLE].

WERE ADJACENT TO COLES, SAM'S CLUB.

WERE WORKING ON COSTCO UP IN MISSOURI RIGHT NOW SO WE ARE VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE NEXT RETAILERS.

>> HAS THE DRAINAGE BEEN ADDRESSED, SEEMS LIKE THIS IS A LOW AREA, HAVE THEY UPDATED THE STORM DRAIN REQUIREMENTS TO TAKE

IT INTO ACCOUNT FOR THIS WEEK. >> SPECIFIC TO OUR SITE OR TO

THE MACRO DEVELOPMENT? >> MAINLY SPECIFIC TO YOUR SITE WITH A PARKING ON THAT SIDE JUST WONDERING THERE IS A TON OF RUNOFF WATER. WITHOUT BEING A LOW AREA ALREADY, I'M CONCERNED WITH FLOODING AND THINGS OF THAT

NATURE. >> ABSOLUTELY.

WE HAVE BEEN WORKING HAND-IN-HAND WITH CRESTVIEW ON THE OVERALL DRAINAGE PACKAGE WITH OUR CIVIL ENGINEER WORKING HAND-IN-HAND WITH THEIRS ENSURE THAT EVERYTHING VARIES OUT FOR THE HYDROLOGY OF THOSE BASINS TO ENSURE THE WATER CANNOT CREATE

CUBA SWAMP. >> MY OTHER QUESTION IS IS THIS

[03:10:04]

>> IT DOES NOT AFFECT WELL IN THE IMAGE, BUT THIS IS THE COLOR SCHEME THAT WE HAVE ROUTE ALL OF OUR CAMPUSES AROUND THE COUNTRY.

>> IT SEEMS TO CLASH WITH THE OLD TOWN FEEL WITH BLACK AND

GRAY. >> THE BLACK IS MISLEADING IN THE IMAGE. IT'S MORE OF A DARK COULD DESCRIBE IT BETTER THE RENDERINGS SHOW MORE ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF THE.

>> I DO NOT PUT THE RENDERING AND, I APOLOGIZE.

>> I HAVE IT ON AN IPAD.

>> MAKES IT HARD FOR EVERYONE TO SEE.

>> THE COLOR SCHEME IS NOT AS DARK AS IT REFLECT ON THAT AT ALL THEIR MULTIPLE LIFE CHURCHES AROUND THE COMPANY THAT HAD A COLOR SCHEME THAT IS A LIGHTER GRAY YOU CAN SEE IT ON IN TINY LITTLE PRINT, BUT IT'S A LIGHTER GRAY BODY WITH THE THIN GRAY ACCENT AND THE DARKER TONES MISSING ARE LIMITED DOESN'T LOOK

LIKE THAT IN REAL LIFE. >> WE PULL UP GOOGLE AND PULL UP A DIFFERENT CAMPUS THAT HE COULD PROBABLY PUT IN LIFE CHURCH

ANYWHERE USA AND PULL UP ONE WE. >> WHERE YOU LOCATED ACROSS THE STREET BY THE WALMART? THAT'S NOT YOU?

>> THAT'S NOT RELATED TO US. >> THEY HAVE SINCE REMANDED TO

LEGACY DO HAVE A CHURCH YEAR? >> NOT IN MIDLOTHIAN.

OUR CLOSEST ONE IS IN [INDISCERNIBLE]

>> JUST CURIOUS WHERE IT IS? >> [INDISCERNIBLE]

>> I DON'T HAVE ONE NOW, I'M SORRY.

THAT'S ABOUT AS FAR AS I CAN GIVE YOU.

>> I'M LOOKING AT THE AUSTIN ONE I GUESS IT'S MORE ACCURATE IT HAS MORE DARK THAN NORMAL BUT WE ACTUALLY HAVE SOMETHING THERE THAT WE SPLIT HALF WE CANNOT USE HER NORMAL BUILDINGS WE NORMALLY WOULD THESE BROWNS ARE CONSISTENT.

>> I DON'T THINK IT HAS ANY OF THE LIGHTER GRAY ON IT ARE MORE

ACCURATE. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? , ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF? THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. HOWEVER WE DO NOT HAVE ANYONE TO WITNESS. SIGNED UP TO SPEAK.

>> I PROPOSED CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARINGS DIRECTLY OF A MOTION TO CLOSE THE HEARING AND IT IS SECONDED.

DON'T JUMP TO BE FIRST. ALL IN FAVOR OF CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING. FIVE TO ZERO.

PUBLIC HEARING CLOSE. WE HAVE ANY DISCUSSIONS? WE HAVE A MOTION. [INAUDIBLE] HE REMIND ME WHAT STOPS CONCERNS WORK WE.

>> FOR THE PARKING SORRY, I WILL GO BACK TO THE SITE PLAN.

OUR CONCERN WAS THAT OUTSIDE OF THE DAYS THAT THE CHURCH WAS IN SERVICE WHICH IT IS SUNDAY AND WEDNESDAY EVENINGS AND SOMETIMES ON SATURDAYS, IT WOULD BE SITTING THERE VACANT AS WE ALL KNOW IN THE CORRIDOR OF TOWN WHICH IS A CONCERN WE HAD WITH

[03:15:01]

THEY COULD PUT SOME FEATURES ALONG THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING TO GIVE IT SOME OF THE 360 ARCHITECTURE YOU CAN SEE EVEN WITHIN THEIR COLOR SCHEME THAT YOU COULD SEE THAT THEY MAY BE ADDED SOME OF THIS ADDED SOME OF THIS BROWNISH COLOR SOMEWHERE AROUND UNIT THEY DID EIGHT MIDDLE OF THE BACK HERE BREAK IT UP A LITTLE MORE WITH THE STOREFRONTS THROUGH VIEW SOME OF OLD TOWN ARCHITECTURE THAT IT WOULD BETTER AND WITH THE DEVELOPMENT INTENT. [INAUDIBLE]

>> BE DO EITHER. >> IF YOU CHANGE ELEVATIONS MY PREFERENCE AS YOU VOTE ON THE ELEVATIONS.

>> I WOULD AGREE WITH THAT, KEVIN BECAUSE YOU COULD PROPOSE IT ON MONDAY AND THEN COUNCIL WAS EASILY TOTALLY DIFFERENT.

SUBJECT OUR OPINIONS AND EVERYTHING MAKES IT VERY DIFFICULT MAKES IT VERY DIFFICULT FOR STAFF.

>> I'M SORRY. I'VE A QUESTION OF THE APPLICANT THERE WAS A COMMENT MADE THAT THE PARKING LOT WOULD NOT BE UTILIZED EXCEPT ON WEDNESDAYS SOME SATURDAYS AND SUNDAYS COULD YOU CLARIFY YOUR CHURCH IS NOT CLAUDE ON WEDNESDAY TUESDAY

THURSDAY AND FRIDAY. >> THAT'S CORRECT FRONT IS THE ONLY DAY IT WAS FOR CAMPUS STAFF TO BE OFF SINCE I DO WORK THE WEEKEND THE SERVICE WE HAVE THIS CAP IS FULLY OPERATIONAL THERE WOULD BE EIGHT SERVICES THEN ONE ON MONDAY NIGHT AN ADDITIONAL TO THAT URSEL INCIDENT MINISTRIES AROUND 300 TEENAGERS THROUGHOUT THE WEEK FOR CAMPUS STAFF IS ALL DAY FROM EIGHT TO FIVE AND ACTIVITIES HAPPENING A SMALLER SCALE BUT THEY ARE WOMEN'S BIBLE STUDIES, [INDISCERNIBLE], WEDDINGS, FUNERALS THOSE TYPES OF THINGS WE TYPICALLY HAVE MINUS THE DAY CARE THERE IS NO DAY CARE AT ANY OF THESE. SO THERE IS ACTIVATION JURY -- ACTIVE AT THE SITE DURING THE WEEK.

>> SO THE [INDISCERNIBLE] THOSE OTHER DAYS WOULD STILL BE USED.

I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE CLARIFIED THIS.

>> OUT AT ONE THINGS FOR THOSE OF US IN DISCUSSION I'VE EVER BEEN THERE FOR BC FOR HOLIDAY IF YOU'RE GOING ACROSS TO GET TO THE BUILDING LENDER TO STAND THE ADEQUATE BUILDING I THINK WE

WILL GO BACK TO DAN. >> WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO APPROVE AS PRESENTED WITH THE VARIANCES REQUESTED, ALL IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR HAND. OKAY.

ALL OF THOSE AGAINST? OKAY.

SO WE ARE AT 3-2. >> UNDER RULES WOULD HAVE TO

[03:20:03]

SO BASICALLY THE MOTION, THE RECOMMENDATION FAILS.

>> DUE TO ATTENDANCE. SO I WILL LOOK TO YOU DO NEED TO

REPHRASE OUR MOTION. >> THE OTHER IS -- OPTION IS TO GET A MOTION ON THE TABLE TO PEOPLE TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF

[INDISCERNIBLE] [INDISCERNIBLE] >> MY QUESTION IS DO WE HAVE A SET OF ELEVATION THAT'S DEFINITELY WARRANTS TO THE REQUIREMENT OF THE PD AND I THINK THE ANSWER TO THAT IS WE DO NOT, IS THAT CORRECT WE [INDISCERNIBLE]

>> AS WE DO THAT I JUST LIKED ALSO SAY YOU HAVEN'T MADE THE CIRCLE GOING AROUND WHERE THIS BUILDING IS ACTING -- BACKING UP TO ELEVATION TO A HILL [INDISCERNIBLE], WE HAVE A MOTION TO TABLE THIS, TO WE HAVE A SECOND?

>> LET ME CORRECT, THE MOTION PROBABLY WOULD BE DEFERRED TO THE NEXT MEETING TO DELAY OR TO CONTINUE.

TO CONTINUE THE NEXT MEETING. THE PUBLIC HEARING HAS ARTIE BEEN HELD SO IT DOES NOT HAVE TO THEN TO BE REOPENED AND REPOSTED SO WE WANT TO DO ANOTHER PUBLIC HEARING ON IT WE COULD BRING IT BACK AND I SUSPECT THAT SEEMS TO BE THE CONSENSUS WITH SOME REVISED ELEVATION.

>> REVISED ELEVATION. [INDISCERNIBLE]

>> I WILL SECOND THAT. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF CONTINUING

[MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION]

PRAISE JESUS. WE ARE AT THE END OF, WE ARE AT THE END OF OUR AGENDA. AND, HOLLAND, JUST NEED TO MAKE SURE THERE IS NOTHING ELSE. STAFF AND COMMISSIONER

ANNOUNCEMENTS PLEASE. >> YES THERE IS ONE ANNOU ANNOUNCEMENT. TAMMY SENT YOU ALL A TRAINING INVITATION TO THE BOARD AND COMMISSIONERS TRAINING THAT IS BEING HELD BY THE [INDISCERNIBLE], I WILL RESEND THAT TO YOU ALL IN THE MORNING AND WE STRONGLY ENCOURAGE ALL OF OUR BOARDS TO ATTEND THAT MEETING AS AN INCENTIVE WE WILL

PAY FEW TO GO. >> LOVELY.

>> JULY NINTH OR TENTH? >> JULY NINTH AND TENTH.

AND LIKE I SAID ONE OF THE THINGS THAT COUNCIL ITS ASKED US TO DO IS TO MAKE SURE WE GOT YOU ALL TRAINED AND THAT'S A VERY ORIGINAL OPPORTUNITY IF YOU ASCENDED AND IF ENOUGH OF YOU AGREE TO ATTEND OR POST IT AS A POTENTIAL QUORUM SO THEY UNDERSTAND YOUR ALL THAT TRAINING.

>> THANK YOU. AND WITH THAT, WE

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.