Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[ Call to Order and Determination of Quorum.]

[00:00:07]

MIDDLESEX. MIDDLESEX.

MIDLOTHIAN7. WELCOME EVERYONE TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. OUR FIRST ITEM ON AT THIS TIME.

[Item 001]

OUR FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS THE STAFF REVIEW OF CASES THAT WERE HEARD BY CITY COUNCIL IN THE LAST 60 DAYS.

THANK, SIR. THE CASES THAT WERE HEARD BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IN THE LAST 60 DAYS THE FIRST ONES SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR A ROAD WIDTH VARIANCE.

THE PLANNING ZONE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL.

CITY COUNCIL FOLLOWED THE RECOMMENDATION AND APPROVED THE

ITEM. >> THE NEXT ITEM THE PLANNING AND ZENNING COMMISSION DIDN'T HEAR THIS ITEM AS IN THE ORDINANCE STATED ONLY COUNCIL NEED TO DO THE FINAL APPROVAL.

BUT I WILL UPDATE YOU ON THAT. IT'S ONE OF THE DATA CENTERS THE CONSTRUCTING AT THIS POINT IN TIME.

THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION WAS FOR AN OFFICE BUILDING PHASE HUB ONE. THAT WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. ARC TUCK CHERL STYLE WAS SIMILAR DESIGNED TO THE SURROUNDING BUILDING.

ORDINANCE AS WELL AS THE MEDIUM AND HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS. THE NEXT ITEM WAS SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR SOLAR FARM. JUST NORTH OF HIGHWAY 67.

RIGHT ACROSS FROM THE PLANT. THE PLANNING AND ZONE APPROVED WITH THE CONDITION OF HEIGHT DOESN'T XOOET TWELVE FEET.

NEXT ITEM ON AMENDMENT MIDLOTHIAN ASSISTEDLYING FAMENT.

THIS IS ONE THAT CONSTRUCTION COUPLE OF ROOMS WERE ADDED ON IN CAN CONSTRUCTION SOME SPACES WERE ELIMINATED.

PLANNING AND ZONING RECOMMENDED APPROVAL PER STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION AND THE PROPOSED REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT.

CITY COUNCIL DID GO AHEAD AND APPROVE THAT AMENDMENT.

NEXT SUMMER CREST PB AMENDMENT. THEY WERE ADDING ADDITIONAL ACREAGE INTO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT.

THEY ALSO CHANGING SOME OF THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATION.

CHANGING WHERE THE DIFFERENT PHASES OCCURRED.

WHAT'S HAPPENING IN EACH PHASE. THEY RECOMMENDED APPROVAL WITH THE CONDITION GARAGE NOT EXCEED I BELIEVE 60% OR 60 OR 70%.

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. CITY COUNCIL DID APPROVE THIS ITEM. AND THEY DID INCREASE THE OVERALL FRONT GARAGES A LITTLE BIT MORE.

I BELIEVE THAT WAS 72%. THE NEXT ONE FINAL CASE THE PARK NORTH PD AMENDMENT. IF YOU DO RECALL THERE WAS AN ERROR WHAT WAS APPROVED VERSES THE SITE PLAN.

THE SITE PLAN WERE SHOWN DEPTH WERE CONSISTENT WITH THE EARLY FACES IN THE PARK SIDE DEVELOPMENT.

FOR SOME REASON WE DON'T KNOW OCCURRED.

IN THE TEXT OF THE ORDINANCE, THERE'S DISCREPANCY BETWEEN TEXT AND LIGHT PLANS. CITY COUNCIL ALSO DID FOLLOW UP RECOMMENDATION. KNOW ARE ITEMS THAT MOVE BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL. I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AT

THIS TIME. >> ANY QUESTIONS?

>> HEARING NONE THAT'S GOOD. THANK YOU.

THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA CITIZENS TO BE HEARD.

THIS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR CITIZENS TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON ITEMS THAT ARE NOT ALREADY ON THE AGENDA.

IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK ON SOMETHING THAT IS NOT ALREADY ON THE AGENDA. FOR TONIGHT.

FILL OUT CITIZENS PARTICIPATION FORM.

AND MAKE US AWARE OF THAT AT THIS TIME.

WE DON'T HAVE ANY REQUEST TO SPEAK AT THIS TIME.

SEEING NO ONE RAISING THEIR HAND WE WILL GO PASS ON TO NEXT AGENDA ITEM. NEXT AGENDA ITEM CONSIDER THE

[Item 003]

MINUTES FOR OUR PLANNING AND ZONING MISSION APRIL 21, 2020.

HAS EVERYONE HAD A CHANCE TO REVIEW THOSE AND DO I HAVE A

MOTION? >> WE HAVE MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER DARRACH AND SECOND BY OSBORN.

ALL IN FAVOR AYE. THE MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.

[Item 009]

NEXT ITEM WE WILL TAKE UP ITEM NUMBER 9 WHICH IS TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE PUBLIC HEARING TO ACT UPON ORDINANCE 21.61 AGER TO REZONE FROM AG SINGLE FAMILY ONE TO A PLANT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 130 FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES.

GENERALLY LOCATED ON SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 663 IN AUTUMN RUN DRIVE. THE REASON WE DO THIS WE HAVE A GREAT NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT HAVE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON THIS.

[00:05:01]

AND TO PARTICIPATE. AND IN THE INTEREST OF PUBLIC SAFETY WE WILL TRY TO GET THEM HEARD FIRST AND MOVE ON.

THANK YOU. ARE YOU PRESENTING ON THIS ONE.

PLANNED DEVELOP REQUEST TO CHANGES ZONING FROM SINGLE FAMILY ONE DISTRICT AND AGRICULTURE PLAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT. THIS DEVELOP ELEMENT BE DIVIDED INTO TWO DIFFERENT FACES. ONE PHASE BEING A APPROXIMATELY 3-ACRE A LITTLE BIT ABOVE THREE ACRES FOR NONRESIDENTIAL USES.

COMMUNITY RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES.

THE NEXT TRACT WILL BE USED FOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH OUR DEFINITION APPLY KABT WILL GO AHEAD AND LET YOU KNOW WHAT DIFFERENTIATES FROM OUR DEFINITION IS HOW WE DEFINE MULTIFAMILY PROPOSAL. APPROXIMATELY THE 11 UNITIES PER ACRE ON MULTIFAMILY TRACT. PRIOR TO GETTING MORE DETAIL INTO THAT. I WANT TO STATE THAT IS ORDINANCE THAT ANY POINT IF THIS ORDINANCE IS APPROVED, THE ONLY PERSON THAT YOU HEARING RIGHT NO IS THE MULTIFAMILY TRACT THAT KIND OF COMES UP LIKE THIS. AND THEN THE NEXT YOU HAVE SEEN THIS HOW IT'S BROKEN UP. HERE'S THE BOTTOM.

HIGHWAY 287 UP HERE. WE'LL MOSTLY BE TALKING ABOUT TRACK TWO. THE PURPOSE OF THIS RIGHT NOW THERE'S NO PLANS FOR DEVELOPMENT IN TRACT ONE.

A TIME OF DEVELOPMENT THEY WILL BE REQUIRED TO GO THROUGH A SIMILAR PROCESS AS WE HAVE DONE WITH OTHER PD'S IF YOU DO RECALL WHEN DISCOUNT TIRE. ITS DONE IN PHASES.

THEY COME IN PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS TO HAVE THIS PORTION VOTE FOR NONRESIDENTIAL PORTION. ONCE AGAIN THIS IS A PHASE TRACK TWO I WILL REFERENCE IN THIS PRESENTATION.

REGARDING THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY.

ONCE AGAIN THE PROPOSED DENSITY IS 11.1 UNIT.

MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL CHARACTERIZING MULTIPLE QUELLING UNIT ON SINGLE LOTTED. TREK TWO OF THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BE ONE LOT WITH ALL 200 UNIT LOCATED WITHIN IT.

I DO PROPOSE CURRENT ZONING ORDINANCE WHY IT WOULD BE CONSIDERED MULTIFAMILY. DEVELOPMENT.

WHAT I WOULD GO AHEAD AND DO ALSO WITH THIS.

I WANT TO LET YOU KNOW THAT THEY ARE AS I SAID BEFORE IN THE PRESENTATION IT'S 200 DWELLING UNITS.

HOWEVER IT'S NOT 200 STRUCTURES. I WANT YOU TO BE AWARE OF THAT.

THEY HAVE RANGES ONE BEDROOM TO THREE BEDROOM UNIT ON THE ONE BEDROOM UNIT OUR DESIGNED TO HAVE A -- A DUPLEX.

THEY ARE MORE OF DUPLEX. WHEN YOU BREAK THAT DOWN, THERE'S APPROXIMATELY 167 BUILDING ON THE SITE.

ANOTHER PROVISION IN THE ORDINANCE SITE REGULATION THEY REQUEST THE MONEY ON SITE THEY DON'T HAVE ISSUES WITH.

BEING LOCATED WITHIN THE DRIVE TO THIS TO TRACT TWO.

TO ALLOW FOR KIND OF A DEVELOPMENT SIGN SHOWING WHAT TELLING THE VILLA WILL HAVE LOGO ON IT.

VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT THE MARKET WALTER STEVENSON HAS.

MOST DEVELOPMENTS HAVE SOME SORT OF LINE DESIGN CHANGE THE NAME 1/2 DEVELOPMENT. THEY WILL BE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENT AROUND THE SIGN. THEY ARE ADDING ADDITIONAL FEATURE INTO THE ENTRANCE WAY TO ADD DECORATION TO IT STAMP CONCRETE, OTHER DESIGNS TO MAKE IT MORE ATTRACTABLE FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. ONE CONCERN WAS ABOUT FIRE ACCESS. ABOUT A TURN AROUND.

THIS SHOW THEY HAVE THE PROPER TURN AROUND.

THEY MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR FIRE REGULATIONS.

WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT WORKING WITH THEM.

WE DID DID CUSS A NUMBER OF MO NOT ANY OF STRUCTURES AND DEVELOP. ANY SHOWED UP WHAT THEY PROVIDE NINE DIFFERENT TYPES OF ELEVATIONS.

EACH DIFFERENT UNIT TYPE THE ONE, TWO AND THREE.

WILL HAVE THREE DIFFERENT DESIGNS FOR THEIR -- THREE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN. THAT WILL ADD DIVERSITY TO THE DEVELOPMENT THROUGHOUT. BY HAVING THESE DIFFERENT DESIGNS, THEY WILL ALSO BE LAID OUT.

THERE'S A VARIATION HOW THEY WILL LAY THEM OUT THROUGH THE LOTS SO YOU DON'T HAVE THE SAME DESIGN IN ONE AREA.

THEY WANT TO SPREAD IT OUT. YOU HAVE NINE DIFFERENT DESIGNS

[00:10:02]

THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT.

THE FORM OF THE BILL. ONE OF THE -- THIS IS SHOWING THE DIFFERENT DESIGNS OF THE BUILDINGS.

BUILDING TYPE 2 ELEVATION. B AND C.

GOING THROUGH THAT. I WANTED TO GET TO THE RIGHT HERE IS THE PROPOSED LEASING OFFICE.

IT CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT OF ONE STORY HELDINGS WILL BE. WE HAVE HEIGHT LIMITATIONS.

WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT. ALL SINGLE FAMILY STRUCTURES THE ONES THAT WILL HAVE ONE UNIT TWO BEDROOM UNIT CAN'T EXCEED TWO STORY IN HEIGHT. AFTER WORKING WITH THEM.

THEY DON'T HAVE ATTACHED GARAGE. ALL THE GARAGES WILL BE DETACHED. IF YOU DO REMEMBER THE AMENDMENT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL WE HAD STRICT REGULATION.

WHEN THIS DEVELOPMENT CAME FORWARD, WE LET THEM KNOW FIRST WHAT OUR MINIMUM REQUIREMENT WERE FOR MULTIFAMILY TRACT.

AND THEY HAD THE REASON THEY ARE BRING THING FORWARD IT'S DIFFERENT THAN TYPICAL MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT.

AND THAT'S WHY THEY REQUEST CERTAIN VARIATIONS FROM REQUIREMENTS HAVING ATTACHED GARAGES, ET CETERA.

IN THE REPORT THEY HAVE BREAKDOWN WHAT THEIR PERCENTAGE IS COMPARED TO WHAT IS MINIMUM REQUIREMENT IN MULTIFAMILY TRACT. ALSO WITH THIS ORIGINALLY CAME IN, THERE WAS SIDING ON THE BACK OF THE GARAGES.

IF THIS PROPOSED WE WILL WORK WITH THEM TO TRY TO LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF SIDING IN THE BACK. WITH THE ELEVATION BREAK UP THE ARC TUCK CHER BEHIND THERE SO YOU CAN HAVE EVEN FOR THE GARAGES THAT HAVE HEIGHTENS A ARCHITECTURAL STYLE.

MAJORITY OF THE DETACHED GARAGES WON'T BE SEE FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. HOWEVER, WHEN WE REVIEW ANY BUILDING NO MATTER WHO VISITS THE SITE, WE WANT YOU ANY TO MIDLOTHIAN. WE CARE ABOUT THE DESIGN AS WE DID REACH OUT. EVEN THE CARPORTS THEIR CARPORTS WILL HAVE MACE ONRY COATING AROUND THE THEY GO PUSHED ROOF ON CARDBOARD. THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE HAVING PEDESTRIAN DOOR. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZONING REGULATION AND DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE MASONRY.

MASONRY AND SIMILAR STYLE TO THE MASONRY BEING USED WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT. HERE'S THE CARPORT I DID MENTION EARLIER WITH PITCHED ROOFS. PATCHES THE SHINGLE.

YOU DON'T SEE THE MASONRY GOING A THIRD UP.

WAINES COATING WOULD BE REQUIRED.

THESE ARE THE COLORED ELEVATION OF THE RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURALS.

1, 2 AND 3-BEDROOM UNIT. AS YOU SEE IN THE BOTTOM LEFT HAND CORNER THERE'S -- JUST THROUGH IN VARIETY OF DIFFERENT ELEVATIONS TO GIVE YOU KIND OF A BETTER UNDERSTANDING WHAT IT WILL LOOK LIKE. THIS NOT ALL OF THEM.

EXAMPLE OF THE CARPORT WITH MASONRY IT'S DARK I APOLOGIZE.

I WILL SHOW THAT. ONE OF THE OTHER THINGS WE HAVE THEM DO LIST OUT THE DIFFERENT AMENITIES TO MAKE SURE THEY MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT. FOR EXAMPLE THEY CHOOSE A DOG PARK. THEY DO MEET ALL THE AMENITY THEY HAVE STATED THAT ARE THE SENIOR STAFF REPORT AS WELL.

THEY MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENT FOR DOG PARK.

NOT ASKING FOR VARIATIONS FROM THE AMENITIES THAT ARE REQUIRED IN THE MULTIFAMILY TRACT. IF YOU LOOK AT YOUR AMENITIES ON -- IN THE STAFF REPORT, SOME OF THE AMENITIES THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE SWIMMING POOL. DOG PARK, COVERED BARBECUE PITS.

FIELDS, THE RECREATION FIELDS AND THEY HAVE THAT SCATTERED THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT. THEY ARE MEETING MINUTE HUM LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT. ONE OF THE VARIANCE THEY REQUEST HOWEVER IS MULTIFAMILY REGULATIONS, REGARDING FENCING, SCREENINGS, AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY IS SUPPOSED TO BE MASONRY WALL WITH VEGETATION. IN ORDER TO HAVE BETTER TRANSITION THEY REQUEST THEY ARE STILL HAVE MASONRY WALL HERE WITH ALL THE PLANTS YOU SEE HERE.

HOWEVER THE REST OF THIS PRINTER IT WOULD BE 6-FOOT HIGH WOODEN SCREEN FENCE BOARD ON BOARD WITH THE TOP CAP AND KICK BOARD.

THEY WORKED WITH THEM ON IN ORDER TO HAVE NICE DESIGN ON THE

[00:15:05]

FENCE. WE WOULD LIKE TO KEEP THAT IN

ORDINANCE AS WRITTEN. >> ONE OF OUR CONCERNS IS AS YOU ALL KNOW, LAST YEAR COUPLE OF YEARS AGO WE DID ADOPT NEW COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS ITS CURRENTLY DESIGNATED FUTURE LAND USE IS URBAN MODULE LOW DENSITY.

WITHIN THAT DESIGNATION IT DOESN'T ALLOW FOR MULTIFAMILY -- WHAT IT'S 69ED TO DO.

IT'S CHARACTERIZED SMALL LOTS. MINIMUM 7500 SQUARE FEET.

THE HIGHEST MULTIFAMILY TREK YOU COULD REALLY HAVE WOULD BE DUPLEX. ONCE AGAIN THIS EXCEEDS THAT.

WE DO HAVE DOESN'T MEET MINUTE REFERENDUM REQUIREMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE URBAN MODULE LOW DENSITY MODULE INTENDED TO ACCOMMODATE RANGE OF HOUSING CHOICE AND PROVIDE PROPER TRANSITION BETWEEN YOUR TRADITIONAL SINGLE FAMILY HOMES AND YOUR MORE HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT SUCH AS MULTIFAMILY. WE DO FEEL HAVE PERMITTED I WOULD GO AGAINST THE PLAN. IT DOESN'T PROVIDE THAT TRANSITION. HOW THE ZONING ORDINANCE IS WRITTEN NOW. WE DON'T BELIEVE PROVIDES THE PROPER TRANSITION AS THIS ZONE MULTIFAMILY TO SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. WE BELIEVE THERE NEEDS TO BE BETTER TRANSITION IN THERE. ADDITIONALLY, WE DO HAVE CONCERN ABOUT THE AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC THIS WILL CAUSE.

RIGHT NOW THERE'S ONE INGRESS EGRESS DESIGN FOR THIS WITH AN ADDITIONAL ONE FOR EMERGENCY ACCESS ONLY.

THIS WOULD ONCE AGAIN BE BLOCKED OFF AND ONLY FOR EMERGENCY TO FIRE DEPARTMENT TO ACCESS IN THE EVENT THEY HAD TO.

WE DO HAVE CONCERN COMING. AS YOU KNOW THERE'S BEEN VARIOUS ISSUES WITH FM6663 WITH DEVELOP. THERE'S VARIOUS STUDIES GOING ON. THAT'S ONE OF OUR ADDITIONAL CONCERNS. ADDITIONALLY, IF YOU REMEMBER GOING BACK TO MULTIFAMILY. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADOPTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACTION ITEM. THE CURRENT RATIO IS SUPPOSED TO BE 10% OF RESIDENTIAL UNIT. CURRENTLY WE EXCEED THAT.

RIGHT NOW WE'RE PROBLEMS ANTICIPATELY AT 15% CITYWIDE FOR MULTIFAMILY AND COMPARISON TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS. ADDING THIS MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT WOULD INCREASE THE PERCENTAGE OF 15%.

ONCE AGAIN THE DESIGN AND DENSITY OF THIS TRACT WOULD PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT NOT CONSISTENT AFOR MENTIONED SECTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

IT DOESN'T PROVIDE THE TRANSITION AS I DESCRIBED.

STAFF DOES RECOMMEND DENIAL BECAUSE INCONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. WE ALSO HAVE SOME CONCERNS WHICH WE'LL ABOUT THE SEWER SERVICE. PERTAINING TO THIS PROPERTY.

WHICH GENERALLY WE DON'T BRING THIS UP.

THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE APPROVED IN CIVIL PLANS.

THAT'S ANOTHER CONCERN WE DO HAVE.

PRIOR TO PLANNING THEY WILL BE REQUIRED AS PART OF PLANNING REKWIERPMENTES TO BRING US A LETTER FROM WATER DISTRICT SHOWING THEY COULD BE SERVEED BY THE WATER AS WELL.

STAFF DOES RECOMMEND DENIAL. IT'S NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPONENTS OF FUTURE LAND USE CHAPTER INCLUDE MODULE CITYWIDE.

IF THE REQUEST APPROVED STAFF DOES RECOMMEND THE FOLLOWING.

ONE THE DEVELOPER BE REQUIRED TO UP SIZE PROBLEMS MAYBE 275 ON 375 TO MINIMUM 12-INCH LINE FOR THE CITY TO MIDLOTHIAN ASSURE ADEQUATE CAPACITY AVAILABLE FOR SEWER.

THE PLAN BE AMENDMENTED TO ALLOW FOR THE MODULE CHANGE FROM URBAN MODULE LOW DENSITY TO EITHER MODULE IMMEDIATE DENSITY.

[00:20:05]

IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1.46 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE GOVERNMENT CODE WE SENT OUT 65 NOTICES TO ALL PROPERTY OWNER WITHIN 200 FEET. WE RECEIVED -- THIS THE ONGOING CHANGING. WE HAVE RECEIVED 20 NOTICES THAT MEET REQUIREMENT FOR PETITION. WE RECEIVED AN ADDITIONAL -- THAT ARE ALL WITHIN 200 FEET.

ADDITIONAL 7VIA E-MAIL WITHIN THE 200 FEET.

WE'VE RECEIVED ADDITIONAL 48 OUTSIDE THE E-MAIL OR BY PETITION. I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AT

THIS TIME. >> URBAN MODULE MEDIUM DENSITY

12 UNITS. >> NO MORE.

>> WHAT THE LOW DENSITY. DUPLEXES.

500 SQUARE FOOT. WHAT'S THE DENSITY PER ACHOR?

>> FIVE OR SIX? >> I DIDN'T CALCULATE IT.

>> AS I THOUGHT IT WAS -- WHAT IS DENSITY OF THIS PARTICULAR

PROJECT? >> 1 11.1.

>> YOU SAID FEEDBACK THAT YOU GOT BACK FROM THE FOOD RADIUS BUT YOU DIDN'T SAY WHICH WAY. IT'S IN OPPOSITION.

ALL NOTICES WE RECEIVED ARE IN OPPOSITION.

>> DO YOU KNOW THE WATER PRESSURE HERE?

>> THEIR ENGINEER. I BELIEVE THEIR ENGINEER MAY BE ABLE TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION. I DON'T BELIEVE THEY'VE GOT TO THAT POINT. ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS?

>> HOW FAR NEAREST PARK? FROM HERE? AND HOW FAR NEAREST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL?

>> THE NEAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IS SOUTH.

NEAREST PARK THE DOG PARK. IF YOU GO MORE NORTHEAST THERE'S

AN ADDITIONAL PARK THERE. >> ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FURTHER THAT GENERAL AREA KIND OF TO THE EAST OF THERE.

THERE'S SOME DISCUSSIONS. >> I'VE HEARD DISCUSSIONS.

BUT WE HAVEN'T RECEIVED APPLICATION OR ANYTHING.

>> UNDERSTOOD. >> THERE'S ALSO THE CITY PARK.

TO THE SOUTH. >> I APOLOGIZE.

PHASE ONE CONSTRUCTED. >> OFF ROUTE 14.

>> I HAVEN'T MEASURED IT. I WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO ANSWER

THAT. >> ONLY WAY TO GET THERE WITH A BICYCLE MOM AND DAD DIDN'T HAVE A CAR OR WALK DOWN.

A MAKE THOROUGHFARE. IT WOULD BE UP TO THAT PARENT.

>> THERE'S NO FURTHER QUESTIONS APPLICABLE --

>> THERE ARE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS THAT ARE EITHER PAR OF HOA OR PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENTS THAT HAVE PARKS IN BETWEEN THEIR.

THEY ARE NOT CITY PARKS. THERE'S A LONG RIGHT AWAY THAT RUNS TO THE PARK. HOA PARK IS FOR HOA RESIDENTS.

THEY ARE NOT PUBLIC PARKS. >> WOULD THE APPLICANT LIKE TO

SPEAK? >> PLEASE COME FORWARD AND IDENTIFY YOURSELF. PROVIDE, NAME ADDRESS.

>> JUST E-MAILED THE PRESENTATION SO WE WILL SEE IF WE CAN GET THAT OPEN. ONE THING I WOULD LIKE TO START OUT SAYING. D WORD MULTIFAMILY IS THROWN OUT A LOT. IT'S ONE OWNERSHIP.

CITIES DON'T TYPICALLY WHERE DO YOU PUT THAT.

IT'S DIFFERENT. WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH CITY OF FORT WORTH. THEY PUTT A COTTAGE COMMUNITY DESIGNATION FOR THIS TIME OF COMMUNITY.

SO IT'S HYBRID HOUSING. ONE OWNERSHIP GROUP.

BUT YOU KNOW AS WE TALKED ABOUT THE COMP PLAN AND ALLOWING DUPLEXES. IF YOU HAVE DUPLEXES IN THIS AIR INHERENTLY YOU HAVE RENTERS. YOU WILL HAVE 15 TO 20 DIFFERENT OWNER WITH RENTER LIVING IN DUPLEXES THAT HAVE NO ON SITE MANAGEMENT. NO ON SIDE MAINTENANCE TO HAVE THAT BLOCKING. THEY WOULD PROVIDE TO RESIDENT OF THAT PROMPT. THAT'S JUST KIND A DISTINCTION BETWEEN A COTTAGE COMMUNITY AND MULTIFAMILY.

[00:25:01]

>> OKAY. WHILE WE WAITING FOR THAT.

WERE YOU GOING TO ADDRESS THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL.

WE'RE HAPPY TO PARTICIPATE. I KNOW THERE'S THAT RIGHT A WAY TAKE. THAT'S GOING TO TAKE PLACE THERE. WHATEVER WE NEED TO DO IS FAR OF PERCENTAGE OF PARTICIPATION. WE'RE HAPPY TO DO SO.

ONE OTHER THINGS WE MENTIONED WAS THE WOOD FENCE THAT IS NOT TYPICAL MULTIFAMILY WITH A MASONRY.

WE'RE OPEN TO DO THE MASONRY. THE REASON WE DID THAT WAS IF YOU DO MASONRY FENCE YOU CAN'T BUILD RIGHT AGAINST THE NEIGHBOR'S FENCE DOING SO YOU WOULD HAVE SET BACK FROM.

OUR PREFERENCE IF THE NEIGHBORS WOULD LIKE TO TAKE DOWN AND DO MASONRY. I'M HAPPY TO DO SO.

WE'RE ARE DOING 30-FOOT BACK WITH LIVING SCREEN.

AFTER A HANDFUL OF YEAR THAT WILL BE A SOLID SCREEN THE INTENTION. SIX FOOT WHEN PLANTED.

WE SPACE THOSE APPROPRIATELY TO WHERE IT WILL BE A TRUE SCREEN

ONCE THOSE ARE GROWN IN. >> WE'LL ASK ABOUT THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL BECAUSE BASED ON THE RESULTS OF ANALYSIS THE SIGNAL WEREN'T IN THE DEVELOP FULL COST OF SAID SIGNAL -- WHEN I SAID MY COST. WE HAVE TO DEVELOP AN AGREEMENT WITH -- THERE'S ANOTHER GROUP THAT'S DOING THREE ACRES COMMERCIAL. WE'RE TRYING TO DO A SHARED COST. THE ONLY REASON WE DON'T HAVE A LETTER FOR THE PEEK FROM WATER YOU ACTUALLY HAVE TO HAVE OWNERSHIP OF THE LAND TO GET THAT LETTER FROM THEM.

WE'RE OBVIOUSLY UNDER CONTRACT BUT WE DON'T OWN THE LAND.

WE WEREN'TABLE ABLE TO OBTAIN IT AT THIS.

I'M SORRY FOR THE CAPACITY OF THAT LOCATION.

WE ARE HAPPY I KNOW ALSO MENTIONED THE IMPROVEMENT DOWN IN THE SEWER FOR FUTURE USE METRO HAPPY TO PARTICIPATE AND TAKE CARE OF THIS IMPROVEMENTS AS WELL.

I CAN STILL WALK THROUGH THE PRESENTATION IF SHE CAN'T PULL IT UP. I WILL JUST START WALKING THROUGH THE PRESENTATION HERE. I WHAT PRESIDENT TO START OFF BY LETTING YOU KNOW WE HAVE COMMUNITIES, BILLS I THOUGHT I WOULD VISIT THAT BEFORE WE CAME HERE.

WE'RE UNDER INVESTIGATION. WE HAVE TO UNDERSTAND ANOTHER ONE COMING IN GRANT PRAIRIE. THEN WE HAVE LOCATION WHERE WE START LOCATION. AND THEN ONE OFF 360 WHICH WOULD BE CLOSEST TO YOUR LOCATION IN ARLINGTON THERE.

THAT FEEDS INTO MANS FIELD OF WE HAVE TWO DEALS THE FIRST ONE UNDER CONSTRUCTION OFF THE PARKWAY EXTENSION.

YOU KNOW WERE WRITE FARMS. WE'RE RIGHT IN FRONT OF THEM.

THE SECOND SIDE. WE'RE THE KIND TRANSITION BETWEEN THE LIGHT FARMS EASTERN BOUNDARY AND THE COMMERCIAL.

AND THAT'S WHAT WE FIND WHEN A LOT OF CITIES WE GO, WE'RE A PERFECT COMMERCIAL SUES. WE'RE SINGLE FAMILY IN NATURE.

WE HAVE A HANDFUL OF DUPLEX STYLE BEDROOM.

EVERYTHING IS AING IF L FAMILY MAYBE THEY HAVE THEIR OWN PRIVATE BACKYARDSED. WHAT'S YOUR DENSITY?

>> PRETTY MUCH ALL OF THE PROBLEM BETWEEN 1 AND 11.4.

ONCE QUESTION GET ACTIVITY AREAS IT ENDS UP BEING AROUND LU 16789 THERE'S 20 10I7B9 8, 11.5. WHEN WE BUILT THESE.

IF WE COULD PULL UP THE SITE PLAN.

WHEN WE BUILD OUR HOMES MOST OF THEM LIKE PODS OF FOUR WHERE YOU CREATE A COURTYARD TYPE ATMOSPHERE.

THE WAY IT CONFIGURES. WE WILL DO PODS OF HOME THEN YOU HAVE SOME OPEN SPACES THAT WE HAVE PEDESTRIAN PATHS KIND OF GET TO UTILIZE THE OPEN SPACES. AS YOU IS HE HERE.

WE WOULD CONSIDER THIS. THE ABOUT 60 OR 50 FOOT

[00:30:05]

[INAUDIBLE] .

WE'LL HAVE THE DOG PARK. CORN HOLE GAMES AND BOCCI BALL.

WE HAVE COMMUNITIES THAT DO SMALL PLAYGROUND AREA OR TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT. WE'RE NOT HEAVILY DRIVEN WITH FAMILIES. WE'RE PREHEAVY ON SINGLE PROFESSIONALS. AND OF THOSE PEOPLE 60% COME FROM A SINGLE FAMILY HOME OF SOME TYPE.

SOME OF THAT THROUGH LIFE TRANSITIONS LIKE EMPTY NEST.

DY, JUST COMING FROM A PARENT'S HOME OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT OR RENTAL COMMUNITY. WE SAY OUR PEOPLE HAVE A CHOICE.

THE AVERAGE RESIDENT OF OUR PROPERTIES THAT WE SURVEYED MADE 75,000. OUR RENT THAT WITH PROPOSE TO START OUT HERE IS 1375 FOR ONE BEDROOM.

1790 FOR TWO, AND 2000 FOR THREE.

IF YOU LOOK 75 FOOT PLAN. WE WOULD HAVE THE MORTGAGE EGIVE LANT ABOUT 325,000. I WOULD THINK A TOWN HOME OR DUPLEX TYPE DEVELOPMENT AND I'LL SPEAK TO MONEY REAL QUICK.

ON THAT WE DID THE CALCULATION ABOUT 80 FOOD HOME.

IF YOU LOOK AT WHAT THAT AVERAGE HOME DR TOWN HOME DEVELOPMENT.

YOU LOOK AT 450,000. WITH OUR DEVELOPMENT, I'VE GOT PROPOSE ALFROM CMI IN DALLAS WE WOULD CREATE 800 TO 900,000 IN THE NEXT TWO YEAR FOR AV VALOR ME TAXES.

I KNOW THIS IS NOT -- THIS THE PICTURE OF GRAND PRAIRIE.

THIS SHOWS HOW JUST TAKE THE HOUSE, DON'T PUT THE SAME HOUSE NEXT TO EACH. SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT ARC TUCK CHERL. WE'VE STEPPED OUT IN OUR NEXT GENERATION OF UNITS. THAT KIND OF SHOWS US.

THAT'S ADJACENT TO POOL AREA. A LITTLE BIT OF OPEN GREEN SPACE

THERE. >> THIS IS JUST A QUICK PICTURE OF BACKYARD AREAS. THEY ARE ROUGHLY THE AVERAGE YARD TEN FEET IN DEPTH BY WHAT. WE DO ALLOW TO THREE PETS.

THAT YOU KNOW, AGAIN, WE'LL DO LITTLE PROMOTION WHERE PEOPLE COME THROUGH AND THE MOBILE PET GROOMING AND THINGS LIKE THAT.

LAST PICTURE I WILL SHOW YOU. I KNOW I'M RUNNING SHORT ON TIME. PICTURE OF OUR KITCHEN.

THESE ARE THE AREA BACK SPLASHES.

STAINLESS APPLIANCES. GROUND CROWN MOLDING.

WE TALK ABOUT THE DENSITY ONE, TWO AND THREE BEDROOM.

THE PARKING, I KNOW IT'S A LITTLE BIT UNTRADITIONAL DOING THE GARAGES AWAY FROM THE UNIT. THAT'S JUST HOW OUR PROGRAM WORKS AND W WE DESIGNATE TO NEAREST RESIDENT.

WE DON'T GET COMPLAINTS FROM IT. KIND OF PART OF OUR PROGRAM.

IS THERE ANY MORE QUESTIONS -- I HOPE I SAID IT APPROPRIATELY WHAT THE COMP PLAN IS VERSES HOW WE DO FEEL THAT WE MEET THE NATURE OF IT DIVERSE HOUSING OPTION.

AND THE NATURE OF -- I DO SEE A TRANSITIONAL PIECE.

I SEE THAT WE PROVIDE A BUFFER. WE PROVIDE A QUALITY HOME AND NOT TO THROW OUT NUMBERS FOR YOU GIVE TO YOUR GUY TO DO MY TAXES FOR ME. BUT THE COST OF THESE UNITS ONCE I LOOK AT THE HARD COST AND EVERYTHING.

THESE HOMES ABOUT 200,000 HOME FOR 1,000 SQUARE FOOT FOOTPRINT.

THESE ARE A QUALITY IF ENERGY WE USE THE SAME MATERIALS THAT THE

[00:35:03]

TOMORROW BUILDING ARE USING. HOW IMPORTANT FOR A DEVELOPMENT OF THIS KIND TO BE WITHIN WALKING OR BIKE IT DISTANCE TO SHOPPING AND RESTAURANT AND THOSE TYPE OF THING?

>> IT'S NOT ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL.

WE LIKE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTITY AND HOURS FOR THIS.

WE LIKE WHAT WE SEE ON THE COMMERCIAL.

IT'S ANOTHER FEATURE FOR OUR RESIDENT.

YOU KNOW, NEXT RAYTHEON. GRAND PRAIRIE WILL HAVE ALL THE AMENITIES YOU WANTED AT THEIR DOORSTEP THERE.

THAT WORKED OUT WELL. GOOD WAY TO RETAIN YOUR RESIDENTS OR GOING THROUGH DIFFERENT CHANGES IN LIFE.

TO PROVIDE THAT DIFFERENT CHOICE OF HOUSE THAT'S SINGLE FAMILY HOME AND THERE'S EVERYBODY HAS WRITTEN REPORTS ABOUT HOW TO BUILD FOR RENT. SINGLE FAMILIES HOME WILL TAKE OFF AFTER COVID. LIT CHANGE THE WAY PEOPLE LIVE.

WE'VE HAD COMMENTS OVER AND OVER.

SO GLAD WE'RE NOT IN FOUR-STORY WITH YOU KNOW CONNECTED CORRIDORS AND EVERYTHING ELSE DURING THIS TIME WHERE IT'S SINGLE FAMILY HOME. WE OFFER THE ABILITY TO RENT IT NOT OWN IT. AGAIN MULTIFAMILY ASPECT IN THE RENTAL WE DO THAT SO WE CAN MAINTAIN.

AND PROVIDE WALK AND LEAVE MAINTENANCE FREE LIFESTYLE FOR

OUR RESIDENTS. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?

>> WE WILL GIVE YOU AN OPPORTUNITY IF THERE'S

QUESTIONS. >> YES, SIR.

>> HAVE YOU SINCE YOUR EXISTENCE AS A COMPANY HAVE YOU TURNED

OVER ANY NEIGHBORHOODS? >> AS FAR AS SOLD.

WE'VE HAD TWO BOUGHT GROUP CALLED INLAND.

THEY WERE SOLD FOR THE HIGHEST PRICE PER DOOR IN WESTERN PHOENIX. LIKE 280,000 A DOOR SELL PRICE.

WHEN THAT OFFER COMES TO YOUR DOOR.

YOU DON'T TURN IT DOWN. WE GAVE THEM AN OPTION TO RETAIN THE GRANT. WE'VE RETAINED IT.

THEY DO THEIR OWN MANAGER WILL KEEP THE QUALITY.

IF SOMEONE 280,000 A DOOR. IT THE WELL MAINTAINED.

. >> IS IT GATED? THIS ONE IS. WE PREFER TO BE GATED.

THE CITY DIDN'T WANT ME TO GATE IT.

IST OPEN TO THAT. YOU KNOW I DON'T FEEL IT'S NECESSARY AT THIS LOCATION DUE TO SAFETY OR ANYTHING.

IT'S JUST OUR PREFERENCE. TO GATE IT WHEN WE CAN.

THANK YOU, SIR. >> I HAVE A COUPLE OF FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS ON THE TRAFFIC -- FOR THE APPLICANT?

>> I HAVE A QUESTION OF TRENT AND ONE FOR COUNCIL.

TRENT IF YOU WILL YOU CAM BAND I QUESTION FOR TRENT TOO.

IF I UNDERSTOOD CORRECTLY THERE'S ONE ENTRANCE IN AND OUT OF THIS FACILITY OTHER THAN THE EMERGENCY.

IS THAT CORRECT? >> YES, SIR.

>> DO YOU APPROXIMATELY HOW FAR TO THE SOUTH THAT ENTRANCE WILL BE? FOUR MILE?

HALF MILE? >> IT DEFINITELY WILL BE -- I WILL HAVE TO GO BACK AND MEASURE.

I DON'T HAVE THE DISTANCE FROM THE CLOSEST RED LIGHT.

NOT FAR FAR? >> IT'S PRETTY CLOSE.

I KNOW THAT GOING IN THERE MIGHT BE THE TIME THEY BROUGHT THE APPLICATION IN. IT'S VERY INTERESTING TIME.

USUALLY WE DO A TIA STUDY. HOWEVER TIA STUDY NOW WE WOULD SHOW GOOD NUMBERS ON THERE. I WOULDN'T SHOW THE TRUE NUMBERS FOR TRAFFIC. IT'S REALLY TELL WHAT IS NEEDED AT THIS POINT. WE HAVE VISION THAT WE'VE TALKED TO ENGINEER ABOUT PERTAINING TIA.

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT. AND WE'LL BE DOING ONE WELL AGGRAVATED POINT. WE ARE DOING I MEAN, SO WHAT ADDITIONALLY WOULD BE NEEDED. IT WILL BE DETERMINED DURING

PLANNING. >> REGARDING RIGHT-TURN ONLY.

ADDITIONAL LIGHTS. ET CETERA.

>> OKAY IS THAT A NORMAL TIME FOR THAT TO BE DONE?

>> WE GO THROUGH IT AS WELL. >> WHAT DOES THE EMERGENCY

ENTRANCE LOOK LIKE? >> RIGHT HERE?

>> IN THIS DESIGN THEY REALLY WANTED TO CHANGE IT FROM THE MAIN ENTRANCE. THE REASON FOR THEY DON'T WANT ATTRACT PEOPLE COMING IN AND OUT.

THIS WILL ALSO BE GATED. NOT TO ALLOW FOR TRAFFIC TO COME

IN AND OUT. >> IT WILL BE GATED.

WE HAVE TALKED TO THEM ABOUT THAT.

[00:40:03]

WHICH THEY ARE PROVIDING FOR US. >> HAVE ONE FOR QUESTION.

EITHER FOR YOU OR FOR COUNCIL. IT'S A STATE MARKET HIGHWAY.

THE CITY HAS NO CONTROL AS FAR AS TRAFFIC ISSUES.

IS THAT CORRECT. >> IT'S A STATE ROAD, CORRECT.

>> I ASSUME THERE'S NO FUTURE TO TAKE THAT OVER?

>> I DON'T WANT TO ANSWER THAT ON BEHALF ON THE CITY OR CITY COUNCIL. I HAVEN'T SEEN ANYTHING.

>> THAT BEING THE CASE. WHAT EVERYBODY THE TRAFFIC CONTROL FOR THE INTERSECTION WILL HAVE TO BE SPECIFICATIONS.

KNOW CITY SPECIFICATIONS; IS THAT CORRECT?

>> CORRECT, YES. >> THEY ARE IN CURRENT

CONVERSATIONS. >> MY LAST QUESTION WOULD BE, HOW MUCH INPUT DOES THE CITY HAVE WITH TEXT DOT IN THE FINAL

DESIGN OF THAT? >> YOU JUST DO WHAT THEY SET FORTH? OR DO THEY GIVE YOU SOME ALLOWANCE IF YOU HAVE CERTAIN CONCERNS?

>> REALLY DEPENDS ON THE PROJECT AND WHAT'S GOING ON.

IN OUR ORDINANCE WE DO HAVE WHERE RIGHT NOW WE ARE REQUIRING TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS. APATROL AS PART OF THE PLAN SUBMITTAL. WE WOULD GIVE BETTER DETAILS HOW TO PREFER TO USE THE DESIGN. BUT WE TRY TO WORK EVERY PROJECT NOT ONLY THE CITY'S PERMIT BUT WORK WITH APPLICANT, ENGINEER.

OUR CITY ENGINEER AND WORKING A DESIGN THAT PROVIDES THE BEST SAFETY AND BEST OPTION FOR THETY.

>> WILL BE TRAFFIC STUDY BY ON TIME TO HAVE INFLUENCE WHATEVER

THE TRAFFIC CONTROL WILL BE? >> THEY ARE REQUIRED TO DO THE CITY. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION YOU HAVE

TO HAVE -- >> PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION?

>> YES, SIR. >> WHAT IT WAS YEAR OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WE'RE WORKING UNDER?

>> 2017. >>> OKAY.

KROGER WAS -- WHEN IT WAS APPROVED IN PD.

>> 2016. >>> ALL RIGHT.

THAT'S ALL I NEED TO KNOW. ANY OTHER QUESTION BEFORE WE MOVE ON TO MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC.

THANK YOU. MEMBERS OF PUBLIC WE WILL ASK YOU TO LIMIT COMMENT TO THREE MINUTES IF YOU ARE SIMPLY REPEATING TRY NOT TO REPEAT THE SAME THING.

YOU WANT TO SIMPLY AGREE WITH SOMEONE YOU CAN STATE SIMPLY IDENTIFY YOURSELF AND THE MIC. IDENTIFY YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND YOU MAY PRESENT YOUR ARGUMENTS.

I THINK ASK PEOPLE. DON'T TOUCH THE MIC.

DON'T GRAB THE MIC AND IF YOU ARE COUGHING OR SNEEZING.

WE'LL WAIT A SECOND. WENDYI WEN WENDYING WITH -- WENDY KING WILL BE AFTER THAT. THEN HAZIM SALON.

IF WE GET THEM ONBOARD AND ON DECK TO SPEAK.

IF YOU WILL APPROACH MIC. DON'T TOUCH THE MIC.

AND JUST INTRODUCE YOURSELF AND PROVIDE YOUR ADDRESS.

>> SURE. THANK YOU GENTLEMAN.

I'M ORVILLE EARHART. I LIVE 406 AUTUMN RUN.

ADJOINING NEIGHBOR TO THE DISCUSSED PROPERTY HERE.

AND GIVE YOU A LITTLE BIT OF BACKGROUND.

I HAD JOHN HOUSTON BUILD MY HOME FOUR YEARS AGO.

AND WE SEARCHED THE WHOLE DALLAS AREA AND DECIDED ON RETIRING IN MIDLOTHIAN. WE FELL IN LOVE WITH AUTUMN RUN NEIGHBORHOOD. HAD JUST WHAT WE WANTED.

WE OBVIOUSLY WERE CONCERNED ABOUT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT.

WE WERE TOLD ABOUT PHASE ONE WHICH -- WHICH I'M IN.

PHASE 2, PHASE 3. MAYBE THERE WAS A PHASE 4.

OF COURSE I WAS INTERESTED IN WHAT THE PROPERTY BEHIND US WOULD DO. AND THE FARM.

[00:45:01]

WE WERE TOLD BY SALES PEOPLE AND DEVELOPERS IT WOULD BE A FARM FOR UNTIL THE BURT DIED. IT'S ZONED AGRICULTURE AND SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING. CONFIDENT WE BOUGHT OUR HOME.

WE SET UP THERE. WE LOVE THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

AND WANT TO STAY THERE. AND WE DON'T WANT TO CHANGE.

I GUESS WE'RE NOT VERY WELL ORGANIZED.

THE NEIGHBORS EYE TALKED TO ALL OF THEM THAT WOULD OPEN THE DOORS. AND OR WERE HOME.

AND I PUT TOGETHER WE DIDN'T HIRE A LAWYER OR ANYTHING.

WE PUT TOGETHER A PETITION. HAD PEOPLE SIGN IT.

I'VE LEARNED. ONLY PEOPLE 200 FOOT REALLY COUNT. BUT WE GOT SOME OUTSIDE OF THAT.

HAVEN'T TALKED TO ANYONE THAT IS FOR THIS.

WHETHER THEY ARE WITHIN 200 FOOT OR FURTHER OUT.

I LOOK AT AUTUMN RUN TOTAL COMMUNITY.

IT MAKES A THREE-SIDED AROUND THE EXISTING FARM NOW.

AND THEN THERE'S A LAND ON THE OTHER SIDE BY THE 7-ELEVEN THAT HAS HOME. I LEARN THEY'D WERE PART OF THIS, THIS AFTERNOON. AND EVERYBODY I TALKED TO OVER THERE SIGNED THE PETITION THAT THEY WEREN'T FOR IT.

I DON'T KNOW IF THEY ARE WITHIN 200 FOOT OR NOT.

SOME GOT THE NOTICE. SOME DIDN'T.

I GUESS WE'RE JUST ASKING THAT YOU DON'T LET THIS HAPPEN TO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. COUPLE OF THINGS.

I DON'T KNOW IF ANY OF YOU. I DOUBT IF YOU HAVE.

I TOOK THE OPPORTUNITY UPON ONE OF NEIGHBOR'S SUGGESTION THAT HE GONE TO GRAND PRAIRIE AND LOOKED AT HERITAGE.

MAYBE HE HELD UP SOME PICTURES FROM THAT PROBABLY PHOTO SHOPPED AND ALL THAT. IF YOU HAVEN'T GOB UP AND LOOKED AT THAT. I WOULD RECOMMEND DOING IT.

AND MAYBE EVEN THE PEOPLE IN THE ON THE STAFF.

IT'S NEW. IT'S I DIDN'T SEE ANY SCRATCHES OR ANYTHING. BUT IT'S AWFUL.

THERE'S JAMMED IN COTTAGES, I THINK THEY TRY TO CALL THEM.

THEY YOU CAN REACH OUT AND SHAKE HANDS WITH YOUR NEIGHBOR OUT THE WINDOW, OUT THE DOORS. THERE'S NOT A SQUARE FOOT ANYWHERE THAT ISN'T USED FOR SOME PAR REASON.

IT JUST DOESN'T FIT THE COMMUNITY THAT I LIVE IN.

AND FORCE THAT IN THERE IS JUST IN MY FEELING TERRIBLE.

AND ANOTHER ISSUE I DON'T KNOW ANY MULTIFAMILY HOUSING SOUTH OF 287. IN MIDLOTHIAN.

MAYBE YOU KNOW OF SOME. I DON'T KNOW WHY WOULD WE PACK THIS THING IN RIGHT AROUND FOUR SIDES OF BEAUTIFUL, WONDERFUL BRAND-NEW HOMES. AND JUST DOESN'T FIT.

AND SO I'M PROBABLY RUNNING OUT OF TIME.

>> I JUST WANT TO SAY WE BELIEVE THE INTRODUCTION OF THIS MULTIFAMILY ADJACENT TO OUR EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AREA IS JUST ADVERSE TO THE COMMUNITY AND I THINK WE WILL REGRET AS TIME GOES ON AS WE ASK THAT YOU NOT ALLOW THIS TO BE ZONE CHANGED TO MULTIFAMILY.

IT TRULY IS TRYING TO STICK 200 UNIT IN ON THAT LAND.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU.

THE NEXT -- DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?

>> HEARING NONE. MISS KING IS NEXT.

THERE'S A QUESTION. >> I'M WALTER BY THE WAY.

WHEN YOU WENT UP TO THE OTHER COMMUNITY WHAT WAS REMIND THE

NAME. >> AVILLA HERITAGE.

THIS COULD BE FOR APPLICANT. I WANT YOUR OPINION.

ASIDE FROM IT BEING CROWDED AND EVERY SQUARE FOOTAGE AREA LIKE YOU SAID OCCUPIED WAS THERE ANYTHING MORE ADVERSE TO THE SITUATION. I DON'T KNOW HOW LONG THAT

PROPERTY HAS BEEN THERE. >> IT'S BRAND NEW.

WITHIN A YEAR OR TWO I ASSUME. IT'S ABSOLUTELY JAM-PACKED WITH PEOPLE. THIS IS, I KNOW A LOT OF PEOPLE AREN'T WORKING THEY ARE AT HOME. THE CARS EVERYWHERE.

THERE'S PEOPLE EVERYWHERE. THESE HOUSES YOU CAN'T TELL ONE ROOF END AND THE NEXT BEGINS. YOU CAN'T PUT I GUESS I THINK THEY ARE PROBABLY OFFERING THEY WILL DO THIS.

WE'LL DO, THIS AND THAT. YOU CAN'T PUT LIPSTICK ON A PIG AND MAKE IT NOT A PIG. I DON'T KNOW HOW TO SAY IT.

ANY DIFFERENT. THAN IT'S JUST AWFUL.

>> ALL RIGHT. I APPRECIATE IT.

THANK YOU. >> MISS KING.

[00:50:02]

HELLO. I'M WENDY KING.

I LIVE IN AUTUMN RUN. I'M HERE TO OPPOSE THIS DEVELOPMENT. AND I TOO WENT TO GRAND PRAIRIE AND BROUGHT YOU SOME PICTURES. BECAUSE DOESN'T REALLY LOOK LIKE ALL THE BEAUTIFUL SLIDE SHOWS THAT THEY SHOW.

THEY ARE NOT SINGLE FAMILY COTTAGES.

THEY ARE DUPLEXES. AND THEY MOSTLY BRICK.

THE FRONT IS BRICK THE BACK IS WOOD.

I DIDN'T GET TO PRINT OUT MY PHONE WENT DEAD.

YOU ARE ASKING ABOUT THE EMERGENCY EXIT CORRECT.

HERE'S A PICTURE OF THE EMERGENCY EXIT.

AND THEN THEY WERE SAYING SOMETHING ABOUT -- WOULD YOU

MIND PASSING THAT AROUND. >> IF YOU WILL PASS THAT DOWN

FOR US. >> AS YOU DESCRIBE IT AND PASS

IT WE WILL WORK IT DOWN. >> IT'S PADLOCKED.

LIKE HE SAID PARKING -- WHENEVER THE THING WAS BRAND NEW I THINK ABOUT TWO YEARS AGO, IT GOT GOOD REVIEWS.

YOU CAN GO ONLINE AND READ REVIEW.

NOW THE PARKING OVERCROWDED. OUR PICTURES SHOWING CARS PARKED IN THE FIRE LANE. AND I DON'T KNOW WHERE THE 60 FEET IS THAT THEY TALKED ABOUT. THIS THE HOUSE CLOSE THEY ARE TOGETHER. I SAW A FEW SINGLE -- WE NEED TO

MAKE SURE IT'S RECORDED. >> I SAW FEW SINGLE LITTLE.

>> I SAY FEW SINGLE LITTLE WHATEVERS.

BUT THEY ARE DUPLEXES. AND ITS IS PACKED.

PACKED PARKED PACKED. HERE ON THIS ONE, YOU CAN SEE THIS THE FILLED. THERE'S WOOD.

IT'S NOT BRICK. THE FRONT IS.

IT HAS BROOK AND ROCKS. AND THEY DO.

BUT I LITERALLY THE LARGEST SEPARATION I SAW BETWEEN ALL THE

ROWES OF DUPLEX WAS ABOUT 20. >> GRAND PRAIRIE IS MORE LAX ON THEIR STANDARDS THAN WE ARE. THE BIGGEST CONCERNS I HAVE, IN TEXAS, THERE IS AN AVERAGE OF TWO CARS PER HOUSEHOLD.

THAT'S 200 CARS. THERE'S ALL RIGHT TWO LIGHT WHEN YOU COME OFF OF 287. LIGHT THERE AND LIGHT BY KROGER.

IF THEY PUT A LIGHT THAT'S LESS THAN HALF A MILE.

ONE, TWO, THREE, LIGHTS IN LESS -- LIKE A MILE.

I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S FEASIBLE. AND ALSO IN TEXAS THE AVERAGE OCCUPANCY OF A HOUSE EVEN INCLUDING MULTIFAMILY IS 2.73 PEOPLE PER HOUSE. 500 PLUS PEOPLE IN LESS THAN 20 ACRES. AND THEN THE OTHER THING AS HE WAS TALKING ABOUT THE GATED COMMUNITY.

THEY HAVE ELECTRONIC CODES TO GET IN AND OUT.

AND SO WE TALKED TO A GUY THAT WAS THERE.

THEY WERE OPEN WHEN WE GOT THERE.

HE SAID THEY ARE ALMOST ALWAYS OPEN.

THEY LETTER NO SECURE. >> THAT'S IT.

>> ANY QUESTION FOR MISS KING? >> THANK YOU, MA'AM.

>> HAZIM SALOH. IS HE IN THE HALLWAY? I THINK HE SIGNED UP AS A SPEAKER.

CAN YOU GET HIM? AND THE NEXT AFTER THAT WILL BE BROOK RAWLINGS AS A SPEAKER. AND THEN JERROLD BENEL.

MR. BENEL WISHED TO BE A SPEAKER.

THE NEXT IS BROOK RAWLINGS. IS BROOK RAWLINGS, HERE?

>> I DON'T HAVE -- BROOK RAWLINGS.

IN OPPOSITION. BOTH OF THOSE TWO WERE OPPOSITION. THEY REGISTERED BUT NOT PRESENT.

IF THEY SHOW UP LATE THEY CAN SPEAK.

GERALD BENEL. IS MR. BENEL PRESENT? WE HAVE SILVIA MILLER -- EXCUSE ME -- NO.

SILVIA MILLER REGISTERED SPEAKER.

MISS MILLER WOULD YOU APPROACH THE PODIUM.

>> YES. THANK YOU.

GOOD EVENING GENTLEMEN. HOPE IT'S A GOOD ONE.

IT'S A HOT ONE TODAY. I LIVE LESS THAN HALF A MILE FROM PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. WE MOVED TO MIDLOTHIAN FROM DUNCANVILLE 1992. I TAUGHT IN DUNCANVILLE.

WANTED TO BRING MY KIDS TO COUNTRY SETTING.

I LOVED IT EVER SINCE. THIS IS OUR HOME.

[00:55:04]

MY REASON FOR SPEAKING BASED ON MY CONCERN WHAT MIGHT POTENTIALLY HAPPEN TO OUR COMMUNITY.

I'M SPEAKING ABOUT THE REQUEST FROM NEXT METRO DEVELOPMENT PUTTING HIGH DENSITY RENTAL AREA.

FIRST OF ALL THIS RENTAL DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT FIT WITH MIDLOTHIAN MASTER PLAN IN LOT DENSITY.

OVER THE YEAR THE CITY WISELY HELD FIRM ON EVERY OTHER SUBDIVISION THIS SHOULD BE NO DIFFERENT.

IT APPEARS THE RESIDENTS HAVE SPOKEN TOO THAT I HAVE SPOKEN TO THAT THIS DEVELOPER ATTEMPTING TO SKIRT AROUND THE ISSUE BY HAVING ONE OWNER FOR ALL 21 ACRES.

YET THEY PLAN TO BUILD NUMEROUS RENTAL UNITS.

TRIGGERING DOESN'T BODY WELL WITH US CITIZENS IN THE MIDLOTHIAN. PERSONALLY I HAVE GREAT CONCERN WITH 21 ACRE TURNING INTO RENTAL@PROMPT.

I AMASSED MY LAND IN PIECES INTEREST YEAR.

AS IT BECOME AVAILABLE AND AS I COULD AFFORD.

I'M ALMOST 20 ACRES. THIS PROJECT WILL GREATLY DIMINISH MY LAND VALUE AS WELL AS PROPERTIES CLOSER.

MY HOUSE AND PROPERTY MY INVESTMENT FOR MY RETIREMENT.

I CAN'T AFFORD PORE MY PROPERTY VALUE TO DECREASE BECAUSE OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL ADVERSELY EFFECT OUR COMMUNITY. WHY WOULD ANYONE WHO JUST FINISHED PAYING HALF A MILLION DOLLARS FOR A HOME BE OKAY WITH THIS COMING IN. I FEEL FOR THOSE PEOPLE.

THIS PROPOSAL IS NO DIFFERENT THAN PUTTING IN MORE APARTMENT.

THEY HAVE NO SKIN IN THE GAME. SO TO SPEAK.

RENTAL UNIT NOT INVESTMENT FOR FUTURE.

I DON'T FOR SEE THEM TAKING CARE OF THE PROPERTY AS THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS. FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF RETIRED EDUCATOR, RENTAL PROMPT IS NOT GOOD FOR SCHOOL SYSTEM.

I'M FROM DUNCANVILLE. I CAN TELL YOU WHAT HAPPENED.

APARTMENTS CAME IN. IT'S ONLY FOR ELDERLY.

RETIREMENT TYPE SITUATION IN SIX MONTHS THEY COULDN'T FILL IT.

WHAT HAPPENED THEY LET EVERYONE COME IN.

NOW WE HAVE TRANSIENTS IF AND OUT, IN AND OUT.

HARD FOR TEACHER TO GET A KID UP TO PACE IN THAT TIME.

AND THEY ARE PUTTING EXTRA TIME. THAT WILL GO BY THE WAYSIDE.

WHAT WILL HAPPEN THE TEACHER HAS TOW DUMB DOWN THE CLASS.

I HATE SAYING. IT'S TRUE.

IT HAPPENS. I DON'T WANT TO SEE THAT COMING TO FRUITION IN THIS WONDERFUL SCHOOL DISTRICT.

TALK ABOUT TRAFFIC. 663.

SOMETIMES I HAVE SIT ON MY DRIVE MINUTES FIVE MINUTES BEFORE I GET OUT ON 663. IT'S HARD.

DURING THE SCHOOL IT BACKS UP OVER MY MILE PAST MY HOUSE.

YOU GOT MORE. YOU PROBABLY 200 UNITS PEOPLE DUMPING INTO 663. HOW ARE WE GOING TO GET OUT.

HOW WILL WE GET AROUND. IT'S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.

I DON'T SEE IT HAPPENS. IT'S JUST TOO MUCH.

IT MIGHT BE A GREAT RETIREMENT COMMUNITY SOMEWHERE ELSE.

BUT NOT FOR THIS CORRIDOR. NOT FOR 663 CORRIDOR.

IT'S TOO COMPACT. YOU HAVE THE ABILITY TO PREVENT THE VEHICLES VALUATION OF THE PROPERTY.

OVERCROWDING OF OUR SCHOOLS AND THE EXTRA STRAIN ON OUR POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENT. IN MAY ONE YEAR'S TIME, THE FIRE DEPARTMENT HAD ANSWER 18 CALLS JUST ON 663 IN THAT AREA ALONE.

>> THAT'S YOUR THREE MINUTES. ANYWAY.

I PRAY THAT YOU ALL MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION.

I KNOW YOU WILL. BECAUSE I KNOW YOUR LOVE FOR

MIDLOTHIAN IS AS STRONG AS MINE. >> I HAVE TWO QUESTIONS FOR YOU.

>> WHAT DO YOU USE YOUR 20 ACRES FOR?

>> WE HAVE AG. >> AND YOU SAID FOR YOUR RETIREMENT. YOU PLAN TO LIVE ON RETIREMENT THERE. I DON'T KNOW DEPENDS ON HOW MY PROPERTY TAXES GO. YOU TELL ME.

I REALLY WOULD LIKE TO STAY HERE.

BUT IT JUST DEPENDS. WE CAME OUT HERE.

IT WAS COUNTRY. OUR KIDS WOULD RIDE FOUR-WHEELERS WE HAD FUN NOW IT'S ALMOST CRAZY.

>> IT'S A DIFFERENT PLACE. 20 YEARS THINGS CHANGE QUITE A

BIT. >> ONE QUESTION.

I HAVE TO PLAY DEVIL'S ADVOCATE. LET'S SAY YOU WANT THE RETIRE IN DEVELOPER COMES TO YOU AND OFFERS SWEET DEAL TO PUT 200 SOME ODD UNITSEN YOUR PROPERTY AND WRITE YOUS THE BIGGEST CHECK YOU EVER THOUGHT YOU WOULD SEE. WHAT WOULD YOU SAY?

>> THAT WOULD BE ONE HELL OF A GOOD CHECK.

BECAUSE I'M NOT GOING TO DO THAT TO MY NEIGHBORS.

>> ALL RIGHT. >> I DON'T WANT THAT HAPPENING

TO ME OR I MY NEIGHBORS. >> APPARENTLY BROOK RAWLINGS ASKED THAT THEIR WRITTEN STATEMENT BE READ.

I WILL READ THAT IN. I'M GLAD TO SEE DEVELOPMENT IDEA COME FORWARD I OOATH APPROVAL OF THE ZONING CHANGE.

MY HOUSE IS.2 MILE FROM THIS NEW DEVELOPMENT PLAN.

WE JUST MOVED TO ADDRESS FEW YEARS AGO IN FACT WE BUILT HERE

[01:00:03]

PURPOSEFULLY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT ITSELF.

SINGLE FAMILY ON MODERATELY SIZED LOT.

200 COTTAGES OR APARTMENT COMPLEX WITH 200 UNIT THE SAME THING. ORIGINALLY TO BE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES WHICH WOULD BE FAR FEWER THAN 200 SMALL COTTAGES AND EASIER TO INSTALL BASED ON FOLLOWING CONCERNS.

FIRST RENTAL PROPERTY WITH SUCH DENSE WILL INCREASE TRAFFIC FOLLOW. AS YOU ARE AWARE TRAFFIC IN THIS AREA CHALLENGED ALREADY WITH WITH THE DEVELOPMENT SOUTH OF AUTUMN RUN ALL THE WAY TO FM-875.

THERE'S OCCASIONAL TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS HERE ALREADY.

THERE ARE NO TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES TO BREAK UP TRAFFIC.

AND MULTIFAMILY HOUSING AT THIS SPOT WILL STRAIN HIGH VOLUME OF TRAFFIC IN THIS AREA. SINCE THE CITY CANNOT INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL WE NEED TO MONITOR THE DENSITY DEVELOPMENT OF THIS AREA. SECOND THE PROPOSE DESIGN PLAN HAS ONE OF THE VEHICLE INGRESS E GRES.

CAUSES TRAFFIC. INCREASES DIRECTLY INTO MY NEIGHBORHOOD. MY DEVELOPMENT IS WORKED HARD TO DEVELOP ALL FOUR PHASES NOW AND HOA WORKS HARD TO MAINTAIN THE CONDITION OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. FINALLY I'M CONCERNED ABOUT MY HOME SAL YOU AS RELATES TO PROXIMITY.

INSTALLING MULTIFAMILY WILL IMPACT MY HOME VALUE.

DURING THIS PANDEMIC WITH EXPECTED ECONOMIC IMPACT OF PROPERTY TAX VALUATION ON THE REAL ESTATE MARKET, WE NEED EVERY DOLLAR WE INVESTED IN OUR HOME WE CAN BEST MAINTAIN OUR VALUE. I RESPECT THEY LOCATE ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT SITE FOR THIS PROJECT PNC REJECT THIS PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE. APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO

RESPOND TO THE SITE. >> THE NEXT SPEAKER WE HAVE

SIGNED UP IS RAY MILBURN. >> GOOD EVENING.

APPRECIATE YOU ALL TIME. I LIVE 405 AUTUMN RUN.

I LIVE RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET. LIKE HIM MY WIFE AND I RECENTLY RETIRED. ME FROM LAW ENFORCE.

. MY WIFE FROM TEACHING.

WHICH LIVED HERE SINCE 1998. WE LOOKED FOR FIVE YEAR TO FIND US A PLACE THAT WE COULD CALL HOME.

AND WE MOVED IN AUTUMN RUN. WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY PHASE ONE WE BOUGHT ONE OF THE LAST HOMES IN PHASE ONE.

PHASE TWOS COMING ON AND IT'S ALMOST COMPLETED.

AND PHASE 3 THEY ARE BUILDING HOMES ALL THE TIME.

SO WITH THAT BEING SAID. WE MOVED THERE BECAUSE WE WANTED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. WANTED A NEIGHBORHOOD WITH LIKE HOMES. OUR TAXES THEY ARE NOT CHEAP.

THEY ARE 8,000 A YEAR TO LIVE THERE.

WE HAVE A NICE PARK. IT'S A NICE COMMUNITY IF YOU DRIVE-THRU THERE YOU SEE DIVERSITY THROUGH ETHNICITY, AGE, CHILDREN, RETIRE WHATEVER. WE HAVE A VERY VAST GROUP OF PEOPLE THATLY IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD.

WE CALL IT HOME. ALREADY YOU TAKE YOUR LIFE IN YOUR HANDS IF YOU TRY TO GET OUT OF ALLIUM RUN AND CROSS 663 WITH NO LIGHT. YOU ESPECIALLY IN THE MORNING OR EVENING. THE TRAFFIC IS ONLY GOING TO GET WAY WORSE THAN WHAT IT ALREADY IS.

THE STREET WILL NOT GET WIDER. YOU WILL KEEP ADDING MORE PEOPLE. AT THEIR PROPOSAL.

TWO CARS FOR FIRST 50 UNITS AND THE 1.67 FOR THE UNITS AFTER THAT. ANOTHER 150 YOU ARE LOOKING AT A BUNCH OF CARS. IF YOU DO BUT IN GATE AS POLICE OFFICER I WAS CRIME PREVENTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN.

ONE OF THE BIGGEST THINGS WE PUT ON MULTIFAMILY WAS LOCKED GATES.

YOU WILL BACK THEM UP ON THE 663.

THEY ARE NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO GET THROUGH THE GATE.

IT'S NOT GOING TO BE VERY LONG BEFORE THE GATE WON'T FUNCTION.

JUST LIKE THEY SAID YOU CAN JUST DRIVE IN.

TRAFFIC COMING HOME WILL BE FRUSTRATED.

THEY WILL BE AGGRAVATED. WHERE ARE THE PEOPLE THAT CHILDREN? WHERE WILL THE KIDS PLAY.

THE PARK IN THE AREA IS IN AUTUMN RUN.

I PAY MY HOMEOWNERS THAT TAKES CARE OF THAT PARK.

THAT IS FOR THE AUTUMN RUN PEOPLE.

BUT WHERE ARE THOSE KIDS. THEY WILL BE THERE.

BECAUSE THEIR KIDS AND THEY WANT TO PLAY AND THERE'S ABSOLUTELY NOWHERE ELSE THESE CHILDREN TO GO.

IF THEY TRY TO CROSS 663. YOU WILL BE WORKING FATALITY ACCIDENTS FOR PEOPLE TRYING TO RUN ACROSS 663.

THERE'S NO WAY TO GET TO GROCERY STORE OR ANYTHING OVER THERE.

I IMPLORE YOU ALL. PLEASE LOOK AT THIS.

GO LOOK AT THAT PROPERTY. GO LOOK AND SEE.

IF YOU LIVED IN THAT COMMUNITY WOULD YOU WANT THAT IN YOUR

BACKYARD? >> THAT'S WHAT I HAVE.

IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS. IT WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER

[01:05:03]

THEM? >> ANY QUESTIONS?

>> THANK YOU, SIR. APPRECIATE IT.

>> WE HAVE FOLLOWING SPEAKER SIGNED UP NOT TO SPEAK BUT JUST CONFIRM THAT'S STILL THEIR INTENT.

JAMES OR MARY SMART. AND ESTEBAN NEIVES.

ANYONE ELSE THAT I HAVE NOT CALLED YOUR NAME BELIEVED THEY SIGN UP TO SPEAK OR WISHED TO SPEAK ON THIS TOPIC.

AND WITH THAT. NOT HEARING ANYONE, WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE TEXT. THIS IS HAZIM.

2613 GIRD RANCH ROAD. STATES I'M IN MEANS AGAINST GROWTH OF OUT CITY OR MULTIFAMILY LIVING SO LONG AS LOCATION THE APPROPRIATE. THE CITY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS AVAILABLE ONLINE AND USED BY MANY PEOPLE INCLUDING MYSELF WHEN DECIDE WHERE TO PURCHASE HOMES.

I STAND JOE POSTED THIS DEVELOPMENT AS IT WOULD GET AGAINST THE FUTURE PLANNING OF THE CITY FOR OUR AREA.

I AM NOT INTERESTED IN INCREASE TRAFFIC.

LOSS OF PROPERTY VALUE AND DISRUPTED SITE LINE THAT I INVEST SEWED MUCH TO GET. AND WITH THAT, THAT CONCLUDES THE PUBLIC HEARING. WITH THE APPLICANT LIKE TO RESPOND. ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS RAISED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC? GIVE YOU A THREE MINUTES TO DO

THAT. >> THANK YOU.

JUST A COUPLE OF QUICK QUESTIONS.

THAT PADLOCK ON THE GATE WAS A CITY OF GRAND PRAIRIE FIRE DEPARTMENTS BOX. THAT THEY PUT ON THERE THEMSELVES. WE'RE NOT PADLOCKING TO KEEP PEOPLE IN OR ANYTHING. THAT'S THE CITY OF GRAND PRAIRIE. THERE'S 42 DUPLEXES AT THE GRAND PRAIRIE PROPERTY. OUT OF 140 HOMES.

TYPICALLY OUR BREAKDOWN ABOUT 30% AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE SITE PLAN. THE NUMBER OF DUPLEXES VERSES THE INDEPENDENT 2 AND THREE BEDROOM HOMES.

YOU KNOW I WILL SAY THIS REAL QUICK ABOUT TRANSIENTS AND RESIDENTS. AS I STATED EARLIER THE PEOPLE HERE MAKE A REALLY GOOD INCOME. THEY HAVE CHOICES.

THEY CHOOSE TO HAVE A LOCK AND LEAVE LIFESTYLE INDEPENDENCE OF SINGLE FAMILY HOME REGARDLESS OF THE SPACE AS BETWEEN THE OTHER HOME. IT STILL HAS FOUR WALLS WINDOW ON EVERY WALL. THEY GIVE THEM PRIVACY AND SENSE OF A HOME. AVERAGE RESIDENT ACROSS OUR PORTFOLIO STAYS 24 TO 28 MONTHS. A LOT OF THOSE PEOPLE CHOOSE TO PAINT THEIR WALLS I'VE SEEN THEM PUT DECORATIONS FOR CHRISTMAS.

THERE IS A TRUE SENSE OF COMMUNITY AT THESE PROPERTIES.

AS I LEFT GRAND PRAIRIE TODAY WE'RE AT 2000 FOR A TWO BEDROOM AND 2250 FOR THREE BEDROOM. AND 97.6% OCCUPIED.

DURING THIS TIME YOU PROBABLY HAVE SEEN A TON OF CARS IN PARKING LOTS. WE HAVE JUST LIKE EVERY PROPERTY TOWN HOME PROPERTY WHATEVER THEY WILL BE COMPLAINTS ON THE NUMBER OF VISITOR COMING ON THE WEEKEND.

OVERBURDENS SOME OF THAT. THAT'S REAL AND WE TRY TO TAKE GOOD LOOK AT THAN PLAN FOR THAT GOING FORWARD.

BUT OTHER THAN THAT. I APPRECIATE AND I DO SEE HUMAN SIDE. OF THE NEIGHBORS.

AND I APPRECIATE THEIR CONCERNS. YOU KNOW.

AGAIN OUR PROPERTY AND WE HAVE ABOUT 20 PROPERTIES ACROSS DENVER, ARIZONA AND TEXAS NOW. AND AGAIN WE'RE 98% OCCUPIED.

ALL THE ARTICLES ON THIS DIVERSE HYBRID HOUSING BEING RECEIVED WELL. WE'RE GETTING ALMOST 20% MORE PER DOOR IN RENT THAN WHAT BOOM CAN CONSIDER MULTIFAMILY RENTAL.

IT'S A PROVEN PRODUCT. PEOPLE SEEM TO BE REALLY HAPPY THERE'S ALWAYS SOME COMPLAINTS. BUT AGAIN WE WELCOME THE OPPORTUNITY TO COME TO MIDLOTHIAN AND BE CAPITAL INVESTOR HERE. AND BE A PART OF THIS.

THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU, SIR.

>> ANY QUESTIONS IF NOT, DO I HAVE MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC

HEARING? >> SO BE IT.

MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BATEMAN. THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED. AND IT IS FOR DISCUSSION OR CONSIDERATION AND MOTION BY THE COMMISSION.

>> MR. CHAIR? >> JUST PERSONALLY SPEAKING FOR MYSELF. I HAVE FOUR SPECIFIC CONCERNS.

ONE THE REQUESTED DENSITY. I HAVE A PRETTY GOOD PROBLEM.

SECOND IS THE TRAFFIC. I THINK IS HUGE CONCERN AND A SAFETY ISSUE. IF THE CITY HAD CONTROL OF THAT I MAY FEEL DIFFERENTLY. BUT THEY DON'T.

THAT'S STATE HIGHWAY AND ULTIMATELY WOULD BE WHATEVER THE STATE DECIDES. THAT CONCERNS ME.

THE LOCATION OF IT CONCERNS ME. AND UNFORTUNATELY THE

[01:10:06]

COMPATIBILITY OF WHERE IT IS BEING BUILT AS I SAID HERE AND LISTEN TO THESE FOLKS AND THEIR CONCERNS AND I CAN CERTAINLY APPRECIATE A PERSON WHO WANTED TO PROTECT THEIR INVESTMENT.

HAVING SAID THAT AND EXPRESSED THOSE CONCERNS, FOR ONE I CANNOT

VOTE TO APPROVE THIS. >> AND I WOULD SPEAK FOR WHERE I'M AT. I DON'T FIND THE TRAFFIC IS CONCERN. I THINK THE ISSUE HERE IS WE'RE GOING TO HAVE I THINK IT'S INEVITABLE TRAFFIC LIGHT GETS PUT IN. APPLICANT WILL BARE THE COST.

I VOTED AGAINST THE 7-ELEVEN. I DIDN'T THINK 7-ELEVEN SHOULD BACK UP TO SINGLE FAMILY HOMES IN THE FARMS. CITY COUNCIL VOTED FOR THAT. I THINK TRANSITION NEIGHBORHOOD LIKE THIS ARE VERY GOOD. AS TRANSITION TO SINGLE FAMILY HOMES WHEN YOU PUT IT IN. PROBLEM WITH THIS IS THAT'S THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DONE IN 2017. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAME WITH LOWER DENSITY. I WANT TO SEE PROJECTS LIKE THIS. I KNOW WE CONSIDERED APARTMENT COMPLEX TO THE EAST OF KROGER. WE VOTED THAT DOWN.

IT GOT 18 UNITS PER ACRE FOR DENSITY.

I THINK THAT TYPE OF PROJECT IN THAT AREA WOULD BE OUTSTANDING.

WE'RE GOING TO HAVE DENSITY. WE KNOW PEOPLE LIVING IN SINGLE FAMILY HOME THEY ARE TOO SMALL. THEY DON'T LIKE THE FACT YOU CAN REACH OUT AND TOUCH YOUR NEIGHBOR.

THE PEOPLE LIVING ON 20 ACRE LOOK AT PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN HOUSES HALF ACRE THAT'S TOO CLOSE.

EVERYONE -- THE PROBLEM IS IN A COMMUNITY THERE'S DIVERSE DEVELOPMENT THAT NEED TO BE DONE FOR EVERYONE.

EVERYONE NEEDS A PLACE. SOME PEOPLE WANT SMALLER HOUSES.

THEY WANT RENTAL PROPERTIES LIKE.

AT 250,000 A DOOR I THINK THE NUMBER.

I KIND OF CALCULATED THOSE AREN'T GOING TO BE BAD NEIGHBORS. THEY WILL NOT BE MAKING TROUBLE OR PROBLEMS. THEY WILL PROFESSIONALS, WE NEED THIS -- I THINK THAT WE HAVE AGREED TO SOMETHING THAT'S PROBABLY IN RANGE OF 6 TO 8 UNIT.

I THINK 11 UNITS IS A LITTLE BIT DENSE AND NEED WORK ON THIS PROJECT. I'M NOT OPPOSED TO THIS TYPE OF PROJECT AT ALL. BUT YOU KNOW UNLESS THERE WAS AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THAT OR REDUCE.

I DON'T BELIEVE I COULD SUPPORT A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OF THIS TYPE. I DO LIKE THIS PROJECT.

AND THERE OTHER AREAS IN THIS TOWN MIDTOWN AND OTHER PARTS AROUND KROGER THAT WOULD BE AN EXCELLENT ADDITION.

I THINK ADDITIONALLY WE NEED DEVELOPMENT LIKE THIS, BECAUSE AS WE SEE DEVELOPMENT LIKE THIS IT WILL HELP TO GET TRAFFIC LIGHTS WE NEED TO SLOWDOWN TRAFFIC ON 663 AND HELP TO HAVE AMENITIES AND SUPPORT THE AMEMBERITIES AND RESTAURANT THAT WE ALL LIKE AND WE BUY HOUSES SO WE CAN WALK OVER.

MY CONCERN WOULDN'T BE SLOWING DOWN THE TRAFFIC.

IT WOULD BE NOT STACKING UP THE TRAFFIC THAN WHAT IT IS.

>> MR. CHAIR, I LIKE DENSITY. PROPER DENSITY.

THIS IS TOO DENSE FOR ME. I MOVE DENIAL.

>> WE HAVE A MOTION FOR DENIAL. >> SECOND.

>> WE HAVE A SECOND. IS THERE ANYONE WISHES TO DISCUSS OR TO ADD COMMONARY BEFORE I CALL TO A VOTE?

>> I JUST WANTED TO SAY EYE BEEN TO A LOT OF THEE PNZ MEETING.

I'VE SEEN A LOT OF PRESENTATIONS AND I KEEP HEARING PEOPLE WANT SMALLER LOTS. PEOPLE WANT DIVERSITY.

PEOPLE LIKE LOCK AND LEE. WE HAVE A WHOLE NEIGHBORHOOD EITHER SIGNED UP TO SPEAK OR HERE SAY THEY DON'T WANT THAT.

I'M NOT REALLY CONCERNED ABOUT AD VALOREM.

I HAVE TO STAND. >> [APPLAUSE] IS THERE ANY FURTHER COMMENTS OR DISCUSSION BY THE COMMISSION? HEARING NUNLEY CALL TO VOTE.

ALL IN FAVOR OF DENIAL OF THE APPLICATION AYE.

ANY OPPOSED TO THE DENIAL HEARING NONE THE DENIAL CARRIES

UNANIMOUSLY. >> ALL RIGHT.

[APPLAUSE] THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA FOR

[Item 004]

THISSEN IS CONSIDER AN ACT UPON REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT PARK SIDE NORTH BE 20 ACRE OF LAND SITUATION WITHIN GW SMITH SURVEY. ARE YOU PRESENTING?

>> I SAVE THE BEST FOR MARCOS. WE LOOKED HIM OUT OF THE ROOM.

[01:15:03]

THIS PLAT FOR THE PARK SIDE NORTH ADDITION.

THIS RECENTLY REZONED JUST AS LAST MONTH AMENDMENT CAME TO YOU CHANGING THE LOT SIZES, ET CETERA.

THIS PRELIMINARY PLAT TO GO IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE AMENDMENT APPROVED BY BOTH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL. THEY ARE PROPOSING 73 LOTS AND THREE HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION LOTS.

THE ALL OF THE LOT MINIMUM ARE MINIMUM ORDINANCE.

LIMITED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS WILL BE REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IN ROAD IMPROVEMENT ARE NEEDED IN CONJUNCTION WITH DEVELOPMENT.

AS A MINIMUM IMPROVEMENT SHALL STABLIZATION OF 3-INCH CONCRETE.

SPANNING THE LENGTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.

THEY ARE PLANNING ON DOING. IT WOULD BE FOR ANYTHING ADDITIONAL. THIS DOESN'T MEAN ALL MINIMUM STANDARDS. AS DICTATED IN THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND STATE LAW. STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

THIS DOESN'T REQUIRE PUBLIC HEARING.

I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME.

>> NO DISCUSSION NO QUESTIONS. DO I HEAR A MOTION?

>> I MOVE APPROVAL. >> APPROVAL FROM COMMISSIONER

BATEMAN. >> WE HAVE A SECOND.

>> ALL IN FAVOR. AYE.

>> ANY OPPOSED SAME SIGN. THE MOTION CARRIES.

IT'S APPROVED. >> THANK YOU.

>> NEXT ITEM ON THE ALLEGED IS CONSIDER AN ACT UPON XESHL XEPGS OF ORDINANCE IN RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION ON APPLE COURT AND APPLE LANE. COMMONLY KNOWN AS 910 APPLE COURT. I THINK YOU READ ITEM SIX.

I APOLOGIZE. I SKIPPED OR ONE.

[Item 005]

>> OKAY THIS IS TO ITEM NUMBER FIVE, CONSIDER AND ABILITY UPON REQUEST FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO ALLOW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING WITH ROOF PITCH LESS THAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENT PROPERTY CONSIST OF 19.6 THREE ACRES.

LOCATED BETWEEN 4651 STOUT ROAD AND 4431 STOUT ROAD.

>> THANK YOU. THE PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY 18.86 ACHOR. THEY REQUEST TO PUT STRUCTURE OUT THERE HOBBY REBUILDING THE CARS.

HE-END CARS. WITH THAT HE BUILDING A STRUCTURE HAVE LIVING CONDITION SPACE WITHIN THE STRUCTURE.

IT WILL MEET ALL MINIMUM RESIDENTIAL STANDARD.

THE ROOF PITCH ONE THING THE SITE DOESN'T MEAN.

OUR CURRENT CODE DOES REQUIRE AN 812 ROOF PITCH FOR THAT STRUCTURE. HE'S REQUESTING SOMETHING BETWEEN IT'S 312 AND 512 PITCH FOR HIS PROPOSED STRUCTURES.

STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVE. WE FILL THIS SPECIAL EXCEPTION IS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA WHAT YOU SEE OF OTHER ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. WE DO FEEL THAT DUE TO SIZE OF LOT AND LOCATION OF THE LOT, AND THE DISTANCE FROM THE PROPERTY LINES THAT WILL STILL BE CARRIED.

STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. ONCE AGAIN, THE ONLY THING I WANT TO POINT OUT IS THAT WE HAVE A QUESTION ON THIS.

PART OF THIS PROPOSAL DOESN'T INCLUDE THIS DRIVE.

THEY ARE MEETING MINIMUM REQUIREMENT.

THEY WILL HAVE CONCRETE. THIS LONGER -- THIS MEETS OUR DISTANCE REQUIREMENT OUR LENGTH REQUIREMENT.

THEY CAN USE ALTERNATIVE MATERIAL AS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. I KNEW THAT WAS ON THE SITE PLAN. I DIDN'T WANT TO YOU TO SEE MARKED ALTERNATIVE DRIVE TAERL. THAT'S NOT A REQUEST.

THIS DOESN'T REQUIRE PUBLIC HEARING.

I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >> WE'VE HAD DISCUSSIONS ABOUT THE FACT THAT SOME AREA ON LARGER LOTS SOME OF OUR STANDARD ARE DESIGNED FOR SUBDIVISIONS LIKE AUTUMN RUN.

DESIGNED FOR THOSE TYPE OF FOLKS.

WE HAVE LARGER LOTS IN THE AREA MORE RURAL THAT WE NEED TO HAVE MORE LAX. IT'S NOT A ONE-SIZE FITS ALL.

ABSOLUTELY UNDERSTAND THIS. WE LOOK INTO CHANGING ORDINANCE

IN THE FUTURE. >> THE LIVING CONDITIONS SPACE.

>> OKAY. DO I HAVE A MOTION OR THIS

PUBLIC HEARING? >> NO PUBLIC HEAR.

>> MOTION APPROVED AS PRESENTED. >> I WILL SECOND THAT.

>> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BATEMAN.

ALL IN FAVOR AYE. OPPOSED.

NO OPPOSED. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIES

[Item 006]

UNANIMOUSLY. NOW ITEM NUMBER 6 WHICH I READ BASICALLY IS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION ON APPLE COURT AND

[01:20:04]

APPLE LANE. >> THANK YOU.

WE DO HAVE SPECIAL EXCEPTION ACCORDANCE 7.13 OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. IT'S IN CONJUNCTION WITH 3.16 DEDICATION AND SECTION 4.14 FINAL PLATS.

THOSE SECTION OF YOUR SUBDIVISION DO REQUIRE THAT ANYTIME LAND IS BEING SUBDIVIDED, IF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IS NOT DEDICATED THEY HAVE TO DEDICATE RIGHT-OF-WAY.

WE'VE HAD LARGE SUBDIVISIONS WHERE YOU WILL SEE AS PART OF THE PLAT A DRIVEWAY ON BEING DEDICATED.

THIS IS DIFFERENT. IT'S 19APPLE COURT.

THIS PROPERTY WAS PREVIOUSLY OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS.

THE PROPERTY WAS ANNEXED INTO 2008.

PRIOR TO THAT, THESE ROADS RIGHT HERE.

YOU HAVE APPLE COURT AND APPLE LANE.

THEY WERE BOTH IN THE COUNTY LIMITS.

BOTH OF THESE ROADS WERE PRESCRIPTIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY.

THE PROPERTY OWNER A MAJORITY OF THIS AREA.

THEY WERE REQUESTING TO SUBDIVIDE THEIR PROPERTY AND THAT TRIGGERED DEDICATION REQUIREMENT.

THE PROPOSED DEDICATION WOULD RE-1.04 ACRES.

THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED SPECIAL EXCEPTION THAT WE DON'T DEDICATE INSTEAD DEDICATION THAT PROVIDE AN EASEMENT TO ALLOW FOR CONTINUING PUBLIC ACCESS ON TO THE PRESCRIPTIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY.

PRESCRIPTSIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY HAS PRIOR TO ANNEXATION HAS BEEN PRESCRIPTIVE RIGHT AWAY FOR 25-PLUS YEARS NOW.

STAFF DUD RECOMMEND APPROVAL DUE TO CIRCUMSTANCES.

WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. FIRST OF ALL THAT DO MEET MINUTE REFERENDUM REQUIRE FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION.

THERE'S CRITERIA THEY DO HAVE TO FOLLOW.

FIVE DIFFERENT CRITERIA POINT. THERE'S SPECIAL THINGS THAT THE APPLICATION. OTHER REGULATION ONCE AGAIN AS I MENTIONED PRIOR TO ANNEXATION. SOME OTHER PROVISION THAT CAN'T IMPACT THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY DUE TO EASEMENT BEING PLACED THERE. THERE WILL BE EASEMENT LISTED ON THE PLAT. SHOEB ON THE PLAT.

THEY WILL BE ABLE TO HAVE ACCESS TO THEIR PROPERTIES LOCATED IN THIS AREA AND TO THIS SOUTH. THAT WON'T CHANGE ANYTHING.

THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ARE THAT A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ACCESS EASEMENT AS I JUST MENTIONED BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY MIDLOTHIAN ON APPLE COURT AND LANE INSTEAD OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION. AND NUMBER 2 THE CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN DOESN'T GRANT RELEASE OF LIABILITY FOR ANY ON APPLE COURT OR LANE. I -- THIS IS NOT REQUIRE PUBLIC HEARING. I CAN ANSWER QUESTION.

I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE UNDERSTAND.

THE CURRENT PROPERTY LINE GOES TO WHAT CENTER OF THE ROAD OR FURTHER PAST THE ROAD? WHAT ARE WE --

>> ON THIS ONE THEY OWN IF YOU SEE THE PROPERTY LANE.

THEY OWN BOTH SIDES OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.

THEY HAVE TO VACATE THE ENTIRE RIGHT-OF-WAY.

THAT'S WHERE YOU GET 1.04 ACRES. THEY HAVE TO DEDICATE BOTH SIDE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY AND TURN PORTIONS OF APPLE COURT AND

LANE. >> THE CITY AND THE PUBLIC HAS BEEN USING 1.04 ACRES AS RIGHT-OF-WAY.

FOR 25-PLUS YEARS. THE OWNER COULDN'T -- THIS 1.04 ACRE. SHE COULDN'T SELL TO ANOTHER PERSON TO DEVELOP THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY.

>> CORRECT. >> THERE'S ARE NO USE TO MAKE

THIS PROPERTY AT THIS POINT. >> I WOULD SAY NO.

>> IN TERMS OF THE ASK FOR REQUEST OF LIABILITY, DO WE HAVE A FUND? HAVE WE ESTABLISHED INSURANCE TO

COVER THIS SORT OF INDINDEMNITY >> THAT'S CORRECT.

>> I WILL TURN THAT OVER. >> I GUESS THAT'S MAYBE A LEGAL QUESTION. GIVING KEVIN SOME WORK.

>> AND REALLY THE CONCERN IS YOU KNOW CITY HAS NOT BEEN ASKED TO INDEMNIFY THE PROPERTY OWNER. THE REQUEST FOR RELEASE.

WE DON'T RELEASE FOR SOMETHING THAT FIRST OF ALL I DON'T THINK EXISTS. AS FAR AS LOT BUILDING FOR ANYTHING THAT OCCURS ON THE ROAD.

SECONDLY, TO THE EXTENT THERE'S LIABILITY.

LIABILITY ALREADY EXIST BECAUSE YOU GET A PUBLIC PRESCRIPTIVE EASEMENT RIGHT THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF THE PORTIONS OF THE PROPERTY THAT YOU SEE ON THE SURVEY THERE.

ANYTHING WE DO WOULD FRANKLY YOU KNOW CITY NOT IN POLICY OF RELEASING PEOPLE FOR THINGS THAT HAPPEN ON CITY STRAIGHTS.

THAT'S WHAT THIS IS ALREADY. IT'S A CITY STREET.

>> I THINK IF THE LAND OWNER. AS I UNDERSTAND THE WORDS MAYBE THIS QUESTION OF APPLICANT. IF THEY WANT TO BE RELEASED FROM

[01:25:04]

LIABILITY. THAT ASK FOR CITY TO PROVIDE THAT RELEASE. THEY ASK THEY WILL NOT HAVE LIABILITY. WHICH TO ME.

WE CAN'T RELEASE SOMEONE FROM THIRD PARTY CLAIM.

WHAT THEY NEED TO HAVE FROM US WE CAN'T DO THAT.

>> I KNOW WHEN I DEAL LAND OWNER THAT ASK FOR RELEASE FROM LIABILITY. THEY ASKING FOR INDEMNIFICATION.

THAT'S WHERE WE ARE. >> THANK.

SORRY I DIDN'T MEAN TO INTERRUPT.

IT'S FINE. NO PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED.

YOU HAVE TO DUMB THIS DOWN FOR ME.

EVERYBODY LAUGH I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO

DO HERE. >> WHEN YOU GO TO SUBDIVIDE A PRESS OF PROPERTY. THERE'S CERTAIN THINGS THAT TRIGER. RIGHT AWAY IS ONE OF THOSE ITEMS. THE APPLICANT CAME IN TO THE CITY TO SUBDIVIDE HER PROPERTY. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS AND ONE OF THOSE REQUIREMENT TO DEDICATE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY I WILL SAY FROM THE BEGINNING SHE'S WANTED DO EVERYTHING THAT WAS REQUIRED.

SHE SAW HOW MANY ACRE. 1.04 ACRE.

SHE DID HAVE CONCERN THAT SHE COULD SPEAK MORE ON THAT.

AND SHE REQUESTED THAT INSTEAD OF GIVING AWAY THIS 1.04 ACRE.

COULD SHE PROVIDE AN EASEMENT. >> IN DOING THAT.

WHAT'S THE BENEFIT? >> INSTEAD OF GOING WITH THE

PRESCRIPTIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY. >> LET ME HELP WITH THE ILLUSTRATION A LITTLE BIT. BY GOING OVER THE SCREEN.

WHAT WE WOULD NORMALLY REQUIRE WITH RESPECT TO SUBDIVISION PLAT REQUIRED OF IN THIS SITUATION, EVERYTHING INSIDE THAT YELLOW DOTTED LINE. AM SOME POINT THE OWNER OF WHICHEVER PROPERTY IS THAT ENCOMPASSES WOULD NORMALLY BE REQUIRED TO DEDICATE THEIR PORTION OF THAT YELLOW AREA TO THE CITY. AS PART OF THE SUBDIVISION PLAT IN THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY. THAT'S WHAT IS NORMALLY REQUIRED. WHAT WE HAVE HERE IS A SITUATION WHERE YOU GOT AN EXISTING -- BASICALLY FOR THOSE WHO I THINK MOST OF YOU ARE FAMILIAR WITH WHAT THAT IS.

FOR MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE. EFFECTIVELY THAT IS A RIGHT OF THE PUBLIC TO BEGIN USING A PATHWAY AND EVENTUALLY A LITTLE FARM ROAD AND EVENTUALLY BECOME A PUBLIC ROAD.

JUST THROUGH USE BY THE PUBLIC OVER A CAUSE OF YEARS, USUALLY MANY YEARS EVENTUALLY TURNS INTO A COUNTY ROAD OR MARKET ROAD.

THAT GET PAEED THEN THERE'S PUBLIC MAINTENANCE ON THIS.

IN THAT CASE I DON'T KNOW THAT THE FULL HISTORY.

IT'S LIKE GOVERN AMOUNT ADVERSE POSSESSION IF YOU WILL OF THE ROADWAY. THAT'S EFFECTIVE I WILL HOW THIS IS GOT CREATED AS A PUBLIC ROADWAY.

THE RIGHT THE PUBLIC HAS IS LIMITED TO BOUNDARY OF USE WITH RESPECT TO ROADWAYS AND THEY GOT DEVELOPED AND HELPED THE DRAINAGE. BEYOND THAT, THAT DOESN'T HAVE ANY MORE USE BEYOND THOSE BOUNDARIES.

THOSE BOUNDARY ARE LOT NARROWER THAN THE YELLOW AREA.

WHAT THE CITY WOULD NORMALLY REQUIRED TO DO TAKE THAT BOUNCE IT OWL TO NORMAL AREA. I THINK WHAT I UNDERSTAND WE'RE BEING ASKED TO DO IS JUST ALLOW THEM TO GO AHEAD AND BECAUSE THEY'RE NO INSTRUMENT IN THE RECORD THAT SAYS THIS PUBLIC ROADWAY WOULD BE GO AHEAD AND THE PUBLIC ROADWAY.

WE HAVEN'T TALKED HOW WIDE THAT STRIP WOULD BE.

IN ANY CASE IT WOULD HAVE TO ENCOMPASS WHATEVER THE ROADWAY

IS. >> MY QUESTION.

>> MY QUESTION I GUESSES WHAT THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY TO WIDEN THAT OUT TO THE YELLOW BOUNDARY AND WHAT BENEFIT TO THE PROPERTY OWNER FOR THE CITY NOT TO DO THAT.

[01:30:03]

>> >> WELL, IF THE CITY TO EVER COME IN MAYBE MORE BACK TO THE LEGAL QUESTION.

BUT EVENTUALLY IF THE CITY CAME AND WANTED TO BUILD A RESIDENTIAL STREET WITH CURB AND GUTTER TO SERVE THIS OTHER PROPERTIES. I WILL BE HONEST WITH YOU.

I HAVEN'T TRAVELED THIS AREA OF THE CITY IN LAST 7 YEARS.

I'M NOT FAMILIAR HOW -- WHERE THIS GOES.

I THINK I MAY HAVE BEEN ON IT ONCE.

>> I WOULD SAY THERE'S AN SANNING.

HERE'S THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY.

IT'S CLEARLY DEFINED IT THE LAW. EVERYONE KNOWS WHAT THEIR RIGHT AND DUTIES ARE. RIGHT NOW IT'S PRESCRIPTIVE EASE M. THE CITY GETS TO USE IT.

LAND OWNER HAS NO RIGHT TO DEVELOP THIS THAT SPACE.

SHE BOUGHT ALMOST TEN ACRE AND SHE CAN'T USE AN ACRE OF THAT PROPERTY. IT'S LITERALLY TAKEN AWAY.

THE PROBLEM IS LIKE I READ IN HER LETTER SHE WANTS TO MAINTAIN. IF SOMEONE JOGGING BY AND TREE BRANCH FALLS DOWN AND HITS THE JOGGER.

AND PARALYZING THEM LIKE GOVERNOR ABBOTT.

HE SUES SHE'S LIABLE FOR IT. IF THE CITY MAINTAINED IT SHE WOULDN'T BE LIABLE. IF SHE DEDICATE SHE'S.

SHE'S MANY BETTER PLACE. BECAUSE WE CAN'T GUARANTEE THIS AND IF WE DID, WE OPEN UP THIS CAN OF WORMS WHERE WE DON'T HAVE ALL THE THINGS THAT EFFECT THE CITY AND WE CREATE THIS ONE OFF WEIRD LEGAL REGIME WHERE NO ONE REALLY KNOWS WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS AND WE CREATE PROBLEMS FOR THE CITY AND FOR THE LAND OWNERS. AND MAYBE 25 YEARS FROM NOW WHEN THAT HITS SOMEONE WE MAKE LAWYERS A LOT O MONEY.

BUT WE'RE DOING THINGS DIFFERENTLY AND CREATING PROBLEMS WHEN THEY TRANSFER THE PROPERTY IF WE DO THIS.

WAY THE CITY PROPOSING WHICH WOULD BE DEDICATION BY THE LAND OWNER, EVERYTHING IS SIMPLE DONE BY THE BOOKS AND PLAT LOW LAWS.

MAKES IT EASIER RESALE THE PROPERTY.

IT JUST MAKES MORE SENSE. >> STAFF RECOMMENDING IF SHE

PROVIDES EASEMENT. >> SHE SAYING I DON'T RECOMMEND THAT. THE STAFF MAY RECOMMEND IT.

I DON'T. >> LET ME ASK YOU THAT.

WE WOULD RATHER HAVE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION.

>> IN HERE YOU ARE SAYING YOU SUGGESTION APPROVAL OF HER

REQUEST. >> BEING EASEMENT.

OVERALL WE WOULD RATHER HAVE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION.

>> OKAY. I GOT A MOTION ON THIS.

>> WE HEAR FROM APPLICANT. >> HI MY DONNA WINDSOR.

WE OWN WHEN WE BOUGHT THE HOUSE 34 YEARS AGO WE BOUGHT 4 AND A HALF ACRE RIGHT THERE ON THE APPLE COURT.

APPLE ROAD. AT THE TIME WE BOUGHT THE PROPERTY THE COUNTY PROVIDED US WITH RELEASE OF LIABILITY FOR THE ROAD BECAUSE IT WAS ON OUR PROPERTY.

AND DID NOT REQUIRE ANY TYPE OF THEY WOULD TAKE OR DEDICATE IT.

WE PURCHASED THE FIVE ACRES ON THE OTHER PROBABLY ABOUT TEN YEARS LATER. MY DAUGHTER WANTS TO BUILD A HOUSE OUT THERE. BIG TWO STORY HOUSE.

TAX RATES WILL GO UP. THE PROBLEM IS IT'S DEEDED IN TWO SEPARATE PIECES. THE FIVE ACRE ARE ON ANOTHER.

I COULD GO AND JUST DEED WORK ON HERS NOND HAVE TO CHANGE MINE.

WE WILL STILL OWN THE LAND. WE HAVE YOU WANT ACRE AND A HALF FROM US. I'VE BEEN PAYING TAXES ON IT FOR 34 YEARS. IT'S OBVIOUSLY GOT VALUE.

AND YOU KNOW GUY WANTS TO JUST DEDICATE IT.

>> I UNDERSTAND YOUR ISSUE AS FAR AS LIABILITY.

I DON'T HAVE PROBLEM WITH NEIGHBORS USING THE ROAD.

I KNOW THEY NEED ACCESS. WE DON'T HAVE ANY TYPE OF UTILITY. THERE'S ONLY 30 HOUSES.

IT'S JUST A REALLY SMALL NEIGHBOR.

ONE WAY IN AND ONE WAY OUT. IT WILL NOT GROW.

>> ABSOLUTELY I UNDERSTAND THAT. THE FACT THAT YOU CAN SUBDIVIDE THE LOTS. YOU COULDN'T HAVE DONE THAT IN COUNT. THERE'S ORDERLY ESTABLISHMENT TO KEEP EVERYONE SAFE. YOU CAN'T USE THE ONE ACRES ANYWAY BECAUSE IT'S A PUBLIC ROADWAY.

YOU DON'T DO YOU UNDERSTAND IF YOU WERE DECIDE YOU WANT TO TAKE THIS ONE ACRE AND CONVERT TO YOUR OWN PERSONAL USE THERE WOULD BE A LAWSUIT OR YOU WOULD BE STOPPED FROM DOING THAT?

>> AS I SAY THE COUNTY PROVIDE LIABILITY RELEASE.

WE WOULDN'T NOT RELEASE FROM ANY LIABILITY.

[01:35:02]

WE MAINTAIN IT. WE MOW.

WE CUT THE TREES. I MEAN, WE'VE BEEN IN THE CITY FOR 12 YEARS I'VE ONLY SEEN THE POLICEMAN ONCE.

DID YOU UNDERSTAND ABOUT THE TREE FALLING ON SOMEONE?

>> THAT'S WHERE THAT RELEASE COMES IN.

THAT MEANS THE COUNTY CAN'T SUE YOU IF YOU CAUSE DAMAGE.

>> NOT THE COUNTY WAS PROVIDE RELEASE FROM BEING SUED BECAUSE

THE COUNTY RAN THE ROAD. >> I'M NOT SURE THAT YOU

UNDERSTOOD -- >> YES, THEY PROVIDED US.

YOUR UNDERSTAND COUNTY GAVE YOU YOUR UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU CALL RELEASE IS THAT IF SOMEONE GOT HURT.

A THIRD PARTY BECAUSE YOU DIDN'T MAINTAIN.

>> NOT BECAUSE THE COUNTY DIDN'T MAINTAIN IT.

>> THE CITY. WHATEVER REASON HAPPENS.

THE PERSON GETS IN A WRECK. AND THEY SUE YOU AND THE CITY.

THE CITY WOULD TAKE DARE OF YOU AND HIRE YOU LAWYER AND DEFEND YOU IN THAT LAWSUIT AGAINST WHATEVER JUDGMENT CAME.

>> ARE YOU KIDDING? >> REALLY.

I DON'T HAVE TO GIVE YOU THE WHOLE 1.04 ACRE.

I CAN JUST WRITE OFF WHAT SHE WANTS TO PURCHASE AS AS THE

DEAL. >> AND WE'LL JUST KEEP THE SIDE

OF APPLE COURT OR APPLE ROAD. >> I THINK THIS IS GOING AROUND IN A CIRCLE. TO THE POINT THAT I'M JUST WANT TO BRING FORWARD STAFF IS REQUEST OR SUGGESTING RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR HER EXCEPTION THAT SHE OBVIOUSLY WANTS. I MAKE A MOTION TO APROVE.

>> LIKE I SAVE WEAN BEEN THERE 34 YEARS AND PAY TAXES.

WHY CAN'T STILL REMAIN PART OF MY OLDINGS.

>> THE ANSWER TO THAT SPEAKING THE REASON WHY THE CITY NOT BUYING. THAT 1 POINLT 04.

YOUR TAX BAY SAYS IT DOES. >> YOURBY SHOULD BE YOU SHOULD TALK TO TAX BASE. THAT'S YOUR JOB TO CONTEST YOUR TAXES. I CAN'T USE THIS.

IT'S A RIGHT-OF-WAY. IT'S PROBABLY 20,000 AN ACHOR.

>> MY TAXES JUST WENT UP. >> THE POINT I'M MAKING YOU SHOULD CHALLENGE IT'S READIWAY. NOT SOMETHING YOU CAN USE TO BUILD A HOUSE. THAT'S RIGHT.

>> I UNDERSTAND THAT. I'M -- MY ONLY CONCERN I DO NOT -- THE CITY. I DON'T THINK THE CITY CAN LEGALLY ACCEPT. LEGALLY ACCEPT THE APPLICATION

TO RELEASE FROM LIABILITY. >> UNLESS THERE WAS A

DEDICATION. >> THAT'S WHY I SAY WHY NOT SKIP THE FIGHT WE DON'T NEED TO HAVE. IF WE APPROVE THIS PRESENTED.

SHE DOESN'T DO THE DEDICATION. WE DO THIS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY

EASE M WE MOVE ON. >> PAY TAXES ON THAT.

>> I WILL. >> I DON'T KNOW IF SHE PAY TAXES

ON IT OR NOT. >> I THINK -- SHE STILL OWNS IT.

SHE HAS THE RIGHT TO CHALLENGE THE TAXES.

>> IF SHE WANTS TO OWN IT. [INAUDIBLE] I JUST PAID 1800 TO HAVE THE SURVEY DONE.

GO COMPLETELY TO THE OTHER SIDE OF THE ROAD ON TO GUY'S TREE

LINE. >> WHEN IT COMES DOWN TO WHAT YOU ARE PAYING TAXES ON. WHAT YOU SHOW THERE.

-- [INAUDIBLE] THIS IS THE SURVEY WE JUST HAD DONE.

MY QUESTION IS -- >> IT'S THE MOTION IN FRONT OF IT. THE POINT SHE DOESN'T WANT TO DEDICATE. THE STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HER NONDEDICATION WITH CONDITIONS.

I DON'T SEE I WANT TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND THE MOTION.

I THINK FOR CLARITY IT CAN'T -- I WOULD SUGGEST AND I -- LET ME MAKE. I WILL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THE REQUEST PROVIDED THAT THE APPLICANT PROVIDES A

[01:40:04]

PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ACCESS EASEMENT TO THE CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN WHICH IS ACCEPTABLE TO MIDLOTHIAN'S CITY ATTORNEY AND DOES NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES INCLUDE A GRANT OF ANY SORT OF RELEASE OF LIABILITY FOR ACCIDENTS THAT OCCUR ON APPLE COURT OR LANE. THAT'S THE MOTION I PRESENT.

>> SECOND. >> WE HAVE A SECOND.

ALL IN FAVOR. >> CAN WE DISCUSS THAT.

[INAUDIBLE] IT'S REALLY THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION. GOING TO RIGHT-OF-WAY.

IF COMMISSION WANT TO DO THAT. STAFF RECOMMENDED PRETTY MUCH

WHAT THE CHAIRMAN HAS STATED. >> I'M JUST CLARIFYING TO MAKE SURE THAT THE FUTURE OF THIS PROBLEMS OUT THERE.

I THINK IT'S ON YOU. IF YOU WANT TO MAINTAIN THE EASEMENT. AND TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTAINING THE EASEMENT. THE CITY WILL NOT CREATE ANY

SORT OF SINKING FUND FOR YOU. >> DON'T WORRY ABOUT IT.

WE CAN TAKE CARE OF. >> THANK YOU.

>> WHAT YOU ARE SAYING THE PRESCRIPTIVE EASEMENT WILL

REMAIN IF PLACE. >> WE WILL REPLACE THE PRESCRIPTIVE EASEMENT WITH WRITTEN EASEMENT.

IN OTHER WORDS THEY ARE VERY VAIG AS TO VAGUE AS WHAT THEY ARE. WE WILL REPLACE WITH WRITTEN EASEMENT PRESENTED BY APPLICANT THAT'S THEIR JOB TO CREATE EASEMENT. THE CITY WILL REVIEW AND SAY WHETHER THAT'S ACCEPTABLE FOR OUR FUTURE OF WHAT WE ACCEPT.

IS THAT -- THAT IS MY UNDERSTANDING.

I THINK -- >> THAT'S NOT WHAT STAFF

RECOMMENDED THOUGH. >> IT'S ESSENTIALLY THE ONLY THING I'VE ADDED TO THIS STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS THAT THEY SAID PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ACCESS RIGHT OF CITY OF MID PID.

I MAKE IT VERY CLEAR ON THE RECORD, THAT JUST BECAUSE THE APPLICANT -- WHAT COULD HAPPEN UNDER THE WAY IT'S WORDED BY THE STAFF. APPLICANT COULD SUBMIT IT.

AND THEN IF WE APPROVE IT THAT WAY THE ATTORNEY DOESN'T GET A CHANCE TO VETO IT AS NOT LEGAL. WE WANT TO MAKE SURE LEGAL COUNCIL. I THINK THAT WOULD BE IMPLIED.

I'M MAKING SURE ITS EXPRESS. >> WE AGREE WITH THAT.

>> FOR 27 YEARS SHE'S HAD PRESCRIPTIVE EASEMENT ON THAT.

SHE BOUGHT THIS PROPERTY WHAT YEAR?

IT WAS IN '86. >> OKAY.

YEAH. SHE HAS HAD THAT.

THERE'S BEEN NO PROBLEM. AND I CAN UNDERSTAND THE LIABILITY ISSUE. I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT. BUT I DO HAVE A PROBLEM NOT ALLOWING HER TO MAINTAIN HER PRESCRIPTIVE EASE M.

>> IT'S NOT HERS. IT'S THE CITIES.

>> THE CITY HOLDS THE EASEMENT ON YOUR PROPERTY.

>> HOW DO THEY HOLD IT IF IT'S PRESCRIPTIVE EASEMENT.

BY CONTINUING TO USE AS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.

>> CORRECT. EASEMENT.

I WILL VOTE NO. >> ANY OTHER DISCUSSION?

>> AM I MISSING SOMETHING? CAN YOU CLARIFY YOUR POSITION?

>> I SEE NO REASON TO CHANGE ANYTHING ANY DIFFERENT THAN WHAT IT IS. ACCEPT I UNDERSTAND THE LIABILITY WHY THE CITY DOESN'T WANT TO DO THAT.

I GET THAT. BUT TO HAVE HER TURN AROUND AND DEDICATE THIS TO THE CITY I DON'T SEE THE POINT IN THAT.

>> I THINK -- WHAT ARE NOT ASKING FOR DEDICATION.

WE ASK FOR WRITTEN EASEMENT. PART OF THIS IS ACTUALLY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE LAND OWNER. ONE OF THE THINGS WHEN YOU GO TO GET TITLE POLICY, THE TITLE COMPANY LOOK AT THIS AND THEY GO THERE'S A ROAD IN THIS PROPERTY. WHAT ARE THE LEGAL DOCUMENTS THAT SHOW THIS PERSON HAS THE RIGHT TO HAVE A ROAD ON THIS PROPERTY. AND IF THEY ARE LIKE IT'S PRESCRIPTY EASEMENT OR WHO MEMORIALALIZED THIS.

THE FACT THAT SHE'S WORKING WITH HER DAUGHTER ON THAT.

THAT MAKES IT EASIER. IT COULD BECOME VERY PROBLEMATIC IN TITLE THING. OUR JOB IS TO NOT CREATE PROBLEMS FOR FUTURE PEOPLE THAT BUY PROPERTIES IN THE CITY OF MIDLOTHIAN. IF WE LEAVE PRESCRIPTIVE EASEMENT. WE TRY TO MAKE THIS AS STREAMLESS AS POSSIBLE. TO TAKE CARE OF PROBLEMS AND ADDRESS THESE. WHERE THE TITLE COMPANY OR MAYBE TEN YEARS OR 20 YEARS THAT THIS DEVELOPMENT AREA.

SOMEONE WANTS TO PUT MULTIFAMILY HOUSES ON THERE.

THEY SELL BY THE FOOT. SUDDENLY BECOMES IMPORTANT HOW BIG THIS RIGHT-OF-WAY IS. FOR FUTURE GENERATION AND THIS

[01:45:05]

WHY WE HAVE LAWS AND WHY WE HAVE RULES AND WE TRY TO HAVE CONTROL WHAT LAND IS DONE WITH. THAT'S WHY WE WANT TO CLEAR DEFINITION AND WE WANT WRITTEN EASEMENT ON THIS PROPERTY.

>> I WILL SAY I WILL JUST ADD TO MAYBE ALLEVIATE YOUR CONCERN.

WHEN I SAT DOWN TONIGHT I HAD TO ASK FOR SOME LEGAL EXPLANATION OF THIS. THAT'S WHY ASKED FOR IT TO BE DUMBED DOWN. IT LACKS LIKE SHE WANTS TO REPLAT THE PROPERTY SO HER DAUGHTER CAN BUILD A HOUSE.

WAIT A MINUTE THE CITY WILL TAKE LAND FROM HER.

I SAID THE CITY BETTER WRITE A CHECK.

BUT I DON'T THINK THAT'S WHAT'S HAPPENING HERE.

I THINK WHAT WE DOING FINDING A MIDDLE GROUND BETWEEN THE ACTUAL DEDICATION WHICH IN THIS SITUATION CONSIDERING THAT THESE ROADS HAVEN HERE FOR LONG TIME IN FULL OPERATIONAL USE.

I THINK THAT WOULD BE THE CITY TAKING PROPERTY AND I DON'T SUPPORT THAT. I THINK WE'RE FINDING A MIDDLE GROUND TO WHERE IF SHE AGREES TO JUST DOCUMENT THE FACT THAT THIS IS AN EASEMENT AND GO FROM PRESCRIPTIVE, TO DOCUMENTED, YOU KNOW, AND THEN OBVIOUSLY NOT HOLD US LIABLE FOR ANY RELEASE OF LIABILITY ON HER BEHALF. I FEEL LIKE WE'RE KIND OF

WALKING TOWARD THE SAME THING. >> ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?

>> IF NOT I WILL CALL THE VOTE. CALL THIS VOTE ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION AS I JUST PRESENTED? AYE.

>> ANY OPPOSED SAME SIDE. TO.

>> WE HAVE ONE IN OPPOSITION. COMMISSIONER OSBORN.

THANK YOU IS MOTION PASSES. >> APPLICATION IS PASSED.

[Item 007]

THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM 7, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER AN ACT UPON ORDINANCE BY AMENDMENTING VARIOUS EXHIBITS TO ORDINANCE NUMBER 2019-62 ESTABLISHING URBAN VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 124

LOCATED 111 SOUTH 7TH STREET. >> THANK YOU.

ON DECEMBER 10TH 2019 THIS WAS APPROVE BY THE CITY COUNCIL TO CHANGE FROM COMMERCIAL TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT.

RECAP ON THIS. IT'S BEEN A COUPLE OF MONTHS.

IT'S PREVIOUSLY ZONED COMMERCIAL.

EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOUSE.

WHAT AT THE TIME THEY WANTED TO DO THEY WANTED TO ADD AN ADDITION. HOWEVER BEING DUE TO HOUSE BEING ZONED COMMERCIAL, THEY COULDN'T MEET THE STANDARD FOR A COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. TO ADD ON TO THEIR HOUSE.

THEY CHANGED TO UVPV WITH THE UVP DESIGNED FOR THIS TYPE OF ZONING TO ALLOW FOR ADDITION. BETWEEN THEN AND NOW WHAT'S HAPPENED THEY RELOOKED AT THE PLANS AND FIGURED OUT THAT WHAT THEY WERE PROPOSING IS THEY WANT TO KEEP SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUT THEY WANT TO ADD ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE.

STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVE. IT DOESN'T ENCROACH ANY MORE SET BACK AND SIDE REAR OR REAR SIDE FRONT OR REAR.

IT DOES CHANGE BUT THE AMOUNT OF CHANGE WE'RE NOT CONCERNED.

THEY WILL BE REQUIRED IN ALL OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE THAT OTHER REGULATION WE FEEL BETTER LAYOUT THAN BEFORE.

THE PREVIOUS ADDITION KIND OF JOGS IN HERE.

REAR JOGS. WHERE YOU HAVE MULTIPLE PHASES.

STICKING OUT. THEY TRY TO SQUARE IT ALL.

RIGHT HERE WHICH MADE MORE SENSE.

THAT'S ADDED ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE.

AND PUT IT SAFETY LOOK. IT'S RIGHT HERE.

SQUARING THAT OFF. AND THEN INSTEAD OF THE SURFACE BEING LIKE THESE SURFACE LIKE THIS.

THEY'VE CHANGED TO ONE SURFACE RIGHT HERE.

AND ADDING A LITTLE BIT SQUARE FOOTAGE.

THIS DOES REQUIRE PUBLIC HEARING.

WE SENT OUT 14 LETTERS. WE DO RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

>> THANK YOU. >> APPLICANT WISH TO SPEAK ON

THIS? >> NOT UNLESS YOU NEED ME TO.

>> SOUNDS GOOD SO FAR. >> OKAY.

GOOD, GOOD. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

>> SECOND. >> SECOND BY COMMISSIONER DARRACH. NEED DISCUSSION? JUST A QUESTION. WHAT'S THE SIDE YARD? WHEN THIS PD -- ORIGINALLY IT WAS COMMERCIAL.

ALL OF THESE LOTS IN THIS AREA ALL THE HOUSES ARE BUILT CLOSE TO PROPERTY LINE. WHEN PU WAS APPROVED THE NEW SET

[01:50:07]

BACK WAS FIVE FEET. IT DOESN'T REDUCE AT ALL.

THEY WILL DO IT IN SAME SET BACK REQUIREMENT.

>> ALL RIGHT. >> I HAVE A QUICK QUESTION FOR APPLICANT. IS THIS YOUR HOUSE?

>> IT IS. HOW LONG HAS THIS PROCESS BEEN?

>> WE STARTED OVER IT ONCE AND THEN I CAUSED 500 PENALTY BECAUSE WE ADDED WE JUST BROUGHT IT.

WE HAD TO START OVER AGAIN. THE WHOLE BIT.

REALLY AT THIS TIME SHOULD BE FINISHING THE PROJECT.

AND WE'RE STILL JUST TRYING TO GET STARTED.

>> BALLPARK HOW LONG? >> NOVEMBER.

2019. >>> THANK YOU.

SORRY. >> MY MISTAKE.

I DIDN'T KNOW A LITTLE JOB LIKE THAT WOULD COST ME $500.

>> IT WANT TO THANK YOU FOR IMPROVING OUR DOWNTOWN AND TAKING STEPS TO DO IT. REALLY IN ALL SERIOUSNESS.

I KNOW IT'S CHALLENGE. PEOPLE LIKE YOU COMING AND FIXING UP THE HOUSES. AND IMPROVING OUR DOWNTOWN.

IT'S REALLY ADDING VALUE. THANK YOU.

>> AND OBVIOUSLY I WILL STATE MY POSITION IN FAVOR OF IT.

>> APPRECIATE IT. >> MOOEGS TO APROVE BY COMMISSIONER BATEMAN. AND SECOND.

ALL IN FAVOR. AYE.

>> AND ANY OPPOSED. >> ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU. THAT CARRIES.

[Item 008]

ITEM NUMBER 8. WE SOME TO SPEAK ON THIS.

>> THAT WAS ORIGINALLY 70 ACRE. THE 2014 THEY CAME BACK AND ADDED 6 BE ACRE WHICH GETS TO 133 ACRE TRACK YOU SEE HERE ON THE SCREEN. THAT THE WHAT ACTUALLY CREATED PD62A. APPLY KANLT REQUEST THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT STANDARD THAT ALREADY STAND WITHIN PD-62-A THAT THOSE ALSO BE APPLIED TO THIS 40-ACRE TRACK.

IT WILL CONSIST OF 116 RESIDENTIAL LOTS.

OVERALL THISOVER ALL LOT COUNT YOU CAN SEE TO EAST YOU GOT ALGRY CULT CHER LAND PD62 NORTH AND PD-52 TO SOUTH.

>> THEY WILL BE PROPOSING WILL RANGE FROM 8,000 UPWARD TO 9,000. IN ADDITION OUR COME PREHENCE PLAN GARAGE PLACEMENT. I JUST WANT TO READ INTO THE RECORD. THAT FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DIRECTLY FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ALL RESIDENTIAL GARAGES SHOULD BE LOCATED TO REAR OF THE LOT

[01:55:08]

>> DOESN'T MEET STANDARD OF CURRENT PLAN.

SHOULD NOTE THAT THE APPLICANT WILL BE REQUESTING FRONTAGE

ALREADY WITHIN PD-62A. >> ON THE SCREEN IS THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN FOR PHASE FIVE. VILLAGES OF WALNUT GROVE LOCATED TO THE SOUTH PD-62A TO THE NORTH.

JUST LOOKING AT THIS RIGHT NOW YOU CAN SEE WHERE THEY ARE LOOKING -- THEY'VE DENOTED WHICH LOTS WILL ACTUALLY HAVE SIDE ENTRY GARAGES OR J-SWING AND THAT GETS YOU TO THE 65%.

EVERYTHING ELSE. THEIR LOT RANKS FROM -- RANGES TO 14-PLUS. SOME LOCATED IN RED OR KIND OF ORANGE THOSE ARE THE ONE AT THE ARE ABOUT 17 TO 19,000 IN SIZE.

I SHOULD NOTE THERE'S 8-FOOT MASONRY WALL THAT WILL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE EAST GATE CENTER.

AND THAT EAST GATE IS ZONED MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL.

ON THE SCREEN ALSO A COMPARISON OF THE EXISTING ZONING WHICH IS VERSES WHAT THE PROPOSED AND AGAIN THE PROPOSED A WHAT ALREADY EXISTING WITHIN PB-62A COUPLE OF THINGS TO NOTE ON HERE. WITHIN THREE ZONING.

THE PROPOSED WHAT THEY PROPOSE 2.86 DWELLING UNIT PER ACRE.

YOU GET TO THAT ONLY BECAUSE AGAIN YOU HAVE A LOT OF OPEN SPACE THAT YOU HAVE TO ACCOUNT FOR.

IF YOU LOOK AT THIS LOT AREA TYPICALLY WITHIN THREE LOT SIZE SHOULD BE ABOUT 24,000. WHAT THEY PROPOSE IS 8,000 TO 19,000. COUPLE OF OTHER THINGS TO NOTE ON HERE AS FAR AS GARAGE ORIENTATION TYPICALLY WITHIN ZONING DISTRICT 0% FRONT ENTRY IS ALLOWED.

IS PERMITTED. NO FRONT ENTRY IS PERMITTED AT ALL. APPLICANT WILL LOOK FOR AT LEAST

65%. >> SO PHASE FIVE WILL INCLUDE 4.9 ACRE OF OPEN SPACE. THAT'S GOING TO INCLUDE PLAYGROUND AREA. TRAIL SYSTEM.

JUST KIND OF RUN YOU ALL THROUGH THIS.

ALSO YOU LOOK AT 8-FOOT TRAIL SYSTEM THROUGH THE AREA.

6-FOOT WIDE TRAIL SYSTEM IN ONLY AREAS.

THAT 6 FOOT WIDE TRAIL DENOTED IN GREEN.

THEY WILL BE FIVE-FOOT SIDEWALKS ALSO THAT RUN THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT. ULTIMATELY THIS IS SHOWING SOME CONNECTIVITY GOING FROM FIVE-FOOT WIDE TRAIL, FIVE FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK TO 8-FOOT WIDE TRAIL AS WELL AS SIDEWALKS THAT WILL CONNECT FROM PHASE FIVE INTO PHASE FOUR.

THIS SCREEN RIGHT HERE JUST SHOWS AN OVERALL PICTURE OF THIS YOU LOOK AT 20 ACRES OF OPEN SPACE.

WE INCLUDED JUST A COUPLE OF PICTURES SHOWING YOU WHAT THE FIRST PART LOOKED LIKE HERE IN PHASE ONE.

I NEED TO SHIFT GEARS A LITTLE BIT.

I KNOW WE'RE TALKING ABOUT ADDING PHASE FIVE INTO THIS DEVELOPMENT. BECAUSE WE OPEN UP THE WHOLE PD THERE'S ONE OF THE REQUEST THAT THE APPLICANT DOES HAVE TRAIL WITHIN PHASE THREE AND FOUR IS REQUIRED.

BY THE CURRENT PD. MEANING THAT IN THIS PARTICULAR AREA HERE AGAIN THIS IS PHASE FOUR, PHASE THREE TO THE NORTH.

THERE'S SUPPOSED TO BE CONSTRUCTING A TRAIL SYSTEM THAT RUNS ALL THROUGH THIS GREEN AREA AND ULTIMATELY CONNECT TO WHAT'S CALLED TRWD EASEMENT AREA. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THIS TRAIL BE SHIFTED TO THE WEST. AND THAT IT NOW NOT BE INCLUDED WITHIN THIS EASEMENT AREA. BUT IT ACTUALLY RUN ALONG SUMMER GROW DRIVE. THAT'S WHAT THE APPLICANT WILL ASK FOR. THE CURRENT PD SAID THERE'S SUPPOSED TO CONSTRUCT A 6-FOOT WIDE TRAIL ELEMENT.

APPLICANT LOOKS FOR THAT TO SHIFT OUT OF THIS AREA AND IT ACTUALLY JUST RUN ALONG THE STREET.

>> DIRECTLY NEXT TO THE STREET LIKE 6-FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK.

[02:00:02]

>> YES, SIR. THAT'S WHAT THE APPLICANT IS ASKING FOR. AND WE'LL GET INTO A LITTLE BIT MORE DETAIL ABOUT THIS. THIS RIGHT HERE IS THE PLUME.

THEY WILL BE ABLE TO COME UP HERE AND EXPLAIN IT BETTER THAN I CAN. ULTIMATELY THIS RETENTION POND AREA. THERE WILL BE A FLUME.

THE CONCERN IS FLUME TAKING UP TOO WIDE A SPACE.

THIS CROSS SECTION OF WHAT THE FLUME LOOKS LIKE.

YOU HAVE 4-1 SLOPE. THAT WILL RUN ROUGHLY ABOUT 25 FEET, 24 FEET, FIVE FEET WIDE. AND THEN YOU ULTIMATELY HAVE SOME SLOPED AREAS ON BOTH SIDES. THAT ULTIMATELY WILL RUN ALL THE WAY THROUGH HERE. ALL THE WAY UP PRETTY MUCH TRWD EASEMENT AREA. THE APPLICANT'S POSITION IS THAT THIS AREA IS TOO TIGHT TO INCLUDE A TRAIL SYSTEM ON THE SIDE. ULTIMATELY YOU WOULD HAVE JUST A SEA OF CONCRETE RUNNING THROUGH THIS AREA.

THAT'S WHAT THE APPLICANT WANT TO AVOID.

SO IN RETURN OF THAT, WITH APPLICANT IS WANTING TO DO HE WANTS TO SHIFT THAT TRAIL OVER TO SUMMER GROVE DRIVE.

THEY WOULD ALSO WIDEN THE SIDEWALKS THAT RUN ALONG GROVE BRANCH DRIVE. THOSE WOULD BE WIDENED FROM FIVE FOOT TO SIX FOOT AS WELL. THE PD RIGHT NOW REQUIRES THAT THERE BE HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL THAT ONES THROUGH THIS TRWD EASEMENT. THE PD IS REQUIRES THEM TO DO SIX-FOOT WIDE. WHAT HE WILLING TO DO IS ALSO WIDEN THAT OUT TO 8 FOOT FROM SIX FOOT.

ULTIMATELY BOTH OF THESE TRAIL SYSTEMS WOULD CONNECT TO OUR CITY'S TRAIL SYSTEM. THAT WILL BE INSTALLED ONCE WE WIDEN WALNUT GROVE ROAD. WE THE CITY ARE PLANNING TO INSTALL AN 8-FOOT WIDE TRAIL SYSTEM RUNNING NORTH AND SOUTH ALONG THAT STRETCH OF ROAD. NOTIFICATIONS WERE PROVIDED.

TO DATE STAFF HAS RECEIVED 27 WRITTEN RESPONSES -- I'M SORRY.

I TAKE THAT BACK. NOTIFICATION WERE SENT OUT.

WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY RESPONSES.

FOR OR AGAINST THIS DEVELOPMENT. AT THIS POINT RIGHT NOW.

STAFF DOES RECOMMEND DENIAL OF THIS REZONE REQUEST AS DEVELOPMENT DOESN'T ADHERE TO COMP PLAN GUIDELINES.

ALTERNATE A MINIMUM TYPICALLY WE WANT TO SEE MORE TRANSITIONAL STYLE LOTS. AND NONFRONT FACING GARAGES WOULD BE MORE IN LINE. I DID ADD WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT THAT CITY COUNCIL OR THEY APPROVE THE REQUEST WE DO RECOMMEND THAT THERE'S CERTAIN CONDITIONS.

BE CONSIDERATE AT LEAST. PEDESTRIAN LET'S START WITH THE FACT FRONT ENTRY GARAGES SHOULD BE PROHIBITED.

SO IT'S MORE IN LINE WITH THE PLAN.

PEDESTRIAN TRAIL ELEMENT REQUIRED UNDER THE CURRENT ORDINANCE BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS 6-FOOT WIDE. WE ASK WE AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNED MODULE DESIGNATION CHANGING FROM COUNTRY MODULE SOMETHING MORE IN LINE.

WITH THAT I CAN TAKE ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.

>> HOW DOES GET ZONE SINGLE FAMILY THREE?

>> YOU'RE OUT IN THE MIDDLE OF NOWHERE.

>> YOU KNOW, YEAH. GO -- THIS WAS OBVIOUSLY BEFORE EL THIS -- THIS IS BEFORE MY TIME.

>> ANY DISCUSSIONS LIKE THAT? >> I'M NOT TOO SURE HOW AND SURE WHEN IT GOT ZONED 3. IT'S BEEN 3 FOR QUITE SOMETIME.

ABSOLUTELY. >> WITHOUTEN COMING TO PNZ OR CITY COUNCIL THEY WOULD BREAK INTO 24,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS.

I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY YOU WOULD GET.

YOU WON'T HAVE TO DO GREEN SPACE.

JUST DO ALL 24 HALF ACRE LOTS ESSENTIALLY.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?

>> WELL WE DID RECEIVE A CALL OF FROM ONE PERSON ON WALNUT LANE.

WE DID NOT RECEIVE A RESPONSE LIKE A FORMAL RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION OR FOR. THEY DID CALL HAVING SOME CONCERNS. THEY DID NOT RECEIVE A LETTER.

[02:05:06]

>> DO WE WANT TO HEAR FROM APPLICANT, THEN?

>> THANK YOU. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOURSELF.

>> MY NAME THE TODD 201 IN WILEY TEXAS.

CIVIL ENGINEER ON THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN THROUGHOUT ALL PHASES OF THE GROWTH THERE. AS MARCOS ALWAYS DOES GREAT JOB OF EXPLAINING WHERE WE STARTED. WE STARTED WITH PHASE ONE AND TWO ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TRW WATER LINE EASEMENT.

THEY WILL EXPAND TO FOUR ACRE. PROBABLY IF FIST EASIEST THING TO START WITH WOULD BE THE TRAILS.

I KNOW WE'RE ONLY TALKING ABOUT ZONING 40 ACRES.

WHAT WE'VE DONE AND CAN YOU FLIP TO THE TRAILS.

I DON'T WANT TO TOUCH IT. I KNOW I'M NOT SUPPOSED TO TOUCH THE MICROPHONE. THERE YOU GO.

NOT ONLY ARE WE PUTTING THE TRAILS IN THIS 40 ACRES HERE.

ALONG ALL THE OPEN SPACE AND PUTTING IN COVERED PLAYGROUND AND THINGS LIKE THAT. CAN YOU BACK UP JUST RIGHT THERE. WE'RE GOING TO ALSO CHANGE THE TRAILS THAT ARE IN PHASE THREE BASICALLY THIS IS PHASE THREE AND PHASE FOUR. WE DIEDED TO DO THEM AT ONE.

WE WILL INCREASE THE SIZE TO 8-FOOT WIDE ALONG TRWA.

WE WILL INCREASE THE WIDTH TO 6 FOOT ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE.

WHICH WILL EXTEND TO WEST AND CONNECT TO YOURS.

AND THE NORTH SOUTH THERE ON SUMMER GROVE IS BASICALLY THE ONE IN QUESTION. WE HAVE GREEN SPACE HERE.

THERE'S A NATURAL LOW SPOT THERE.

THAT'S WHERE THE DRAINAGE GOES FROM PHASE ONE AND TWO THROUGH THIS ENTIRE SIDE. IT'S A DRAINAGE EASEMENT.

WE WENT OUT THERE AND MET WITH THE CITY ENGINEER.

YOU CAN SEE SECTION 2-A OR A-2. BASICALLY THAT SPACE YOU SEE THERE'S 45-FOOT WIDE. THAT ONLY LEAVES TEN FEET TO PUT THIS -- THIS TRAIL IN HERE. SOME ISSUE WITH THAT, THAT I SEE AS ENGINEER. OBVIOUSLY THE SLOPE 4-1 SLOPE.

YOU CAN'T PUT A TRAIL BACK. THEY WIND UP WITH RETAINING WALL. IT'S A SAFETY ISSUE.

BECAUSE THERE'S A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF WATER COMING THROUGH HERE WHEN WE HAVE A LARGE STORM EVENT.

WE DON'T WANT TO ENCOURAGE KIDS BACK THERE.

THERE'S A GREAT IF THEY WERE BACK.

WE DON'T WANT THE KIDS BACK THERE FOR ONE THING.

ONE OF THIS THINGS TOO THAT WE THINK DISADVANTAGE TO HOME WILLEDER THIS TRAILED WOULD BE LITERALLY RIGHT UP AGAINST SOMEONE'S BACK FENCE. THOSE FENCES THAT BACK UP INTO OPEN SPACE ARE WROUGHT-IRON. SOMEONE COULD BE STANDING IN THE BACKYARD. THAT'S NOT AS DESIRABLE.

THAT'S WHY WE WANT TO MOVE TO SUMMER GROVE.

YOU MIGHT NOTE SUMMER GROVE 60-FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY.

IT'S NORTH SOUTH I GUESS COLLECTOR MOVING AROUND.

WE WILL EXPAND THE SIDEWALK TO BE SIX-FOOT SIDE WALK.

MOVING IT OUT OF THE DRAINAGE AREA REALLY IT'S REALLY A SAFETY ISSUE. IT'S JUST NOT THE IDEAL SITUATION. I DON'T THINK ANYONE WANTS IT IN THE BACKYARD. BECAUSE OF THE AMOUNT OF FLOW IN STORM EVENT I DON'T LIKE IT BECAUSE OF THE SAFETY REASON.

WE ALSO WOULD CONNECT OUR TRAILS INTO THIS NEXT 40 ACRES.

IF YOU CAN GO BACK DOWN. WE'LL HAVE CONNECTIVITY FROM TRA ALL THE WAY THROUGH THIS. ONE THING THAT NEEDS TO BE MENTIONED AS WELL TO SOUTH OF 40 ACRES THAT WE TALK ABOUT YOU MAY REMEMBER MAYBE FOUR OR FIVE OR SIX MONTHS AGO WE CAME IN AND GOT THAT RESIDENTIAL PIECE ZONED OUT OF THAT PD DOWN THERE.

TO MATCH WHAT WE ARE DOING. THOSE LOTS ARE THE SAME SIZE AND SAME AREA SAME AVERAGE AS WHAT WE DO.

WE ABSORB THIS INTO THE GROWTH. THIS HAS BEEN SUCCESSFUL.

I THINK YOU SEE THE QUALITY THAT'S BEING BUILT THERE.

AND THIS WOULD BE BASICALLY CONTINUATION OF THAT.

[02:10:04]

THEY ALSO SPOKE ON THE PARK AREA.

WE WOULD HAVE A COVERED PLAYGROUND.

WE HAVE THE MAGELLAN PIPELINE TO DEAL.

YOU CAN SEE THEY MAKE A GATE THOSE.

THEY ARE REALLY NOT ACCEPTABLE. IT'S MAINTAINED BY THE HOA.

8-FOOT MASONRY WALL. IT COMES DOWN TO THE LOT COUNT MATCHES EVERYTHING THE PARK AND THE ONE THING TOO THAT I WILL MENTION. WE WERE JUST DOING PHASE THREE AND FOUR. NOW AS DEVELOPER HAS PUT TOGETHER THE TRACKS, WE'RE GOING TO PUT AN OFF SITE GRAVITY SEWER LINE BY THE CITY STAFF IS VERY EXCITED ABOUT SO YOU DON'T HAVE ANOTHER LIFT STATION TO MAINTAIN.

THAT DOES OPEN A LOT MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR THE CITY AS WELL. WE ARE PUTTING THE LINE.

A LONG WALNUT LANE HERE MAYBE THIS LATEST WILL SPEAK TO H.

WE HAVE SMALL RETAINING WALL THAT BACKS UP AND PHASE THREE TO THIS DEVELOPMENT. IN ORDER TO SAVE THE TREE.

WE MOVE THE RETAINING WALL IN SAVE TREE AND MAKE SURE WE DON'T LOSE THOSE TREES. WE KEEP NICE BUFFER THERE.

THAT RETAINING WALL MAKES THE STRENGTH IN FRONT SO WE DON'T HAVE DRAINAGE ON HOMEOWNERS. THAT JOIN PHASE THREE AND FOUR.

AS YOU SEE THE GREEN SPACE HERE. THAT WILL BE OPEN SPACE.

WE'LL LEAVE IT NATURAL. TRY TO KEEP THAT OPEN FILL.

THERE'S A FEW TREES IN THERE AS YOU CAN SEE THERE.

THERE'S SOME TREES THAT KIND OF FOLLOW THAT RIGHT THERE.

BASICALLY WE ARE ASKING TO JUST EXPAND THE EXISTING PD.

THERE'S A 65 ENTRY. >> ROW, FACE, ONE, TWO, THREE AND FOUR HAVE THE SAME PD. WITH 65%.

65% FRONT ENTRY. THE VILLAGE OF WALNUT HILL JUST THE SHADED IN BELOW IT HERE WHICH WILL CONNECT INTO 87.

ALSO HAS 65% OF ENTRY. WE'RE NOT ASKING TO GO OUT MIDDLE OF NOWHERE AS YOU MENTIONED AND ASK FOR THIS.

THIS IS CONTINUATION OF IF THAT'S THE RIGHT WORD.

BECAUSE IT HAS IT ON BOTH ENDS. WE'RE NOT ASKING FOR ANYTHING MORE THAN WHAT THE PD HAS ALWAYS ALLOWED.

WITH THAT IT WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS.

>> ALL YOU ARE ASKING FOR THAT THE EXACTLY CORRECT.

THAT WOULD BE EXACTLY WHAT WE WOULD ASK THE MOTION TO JUST ABSORB THIS INTO THE EXISTING PD AND FOLLOW THE SAME RULES THAT

WE'RE FOLLOWING. >> ALL THE PLACE FROM GARAGE DOORS AND ROOF PITCHES AND ELEVATION SEPARATION AND ALL THOSE THINGS. WE'RE STILL IN LINE.

>> THIS BACKS UP ON THE INDUSTRIAL PARK.

>> THIS PROMPT WE HAD FEW DISCUSSIONS ABOUT? TWO MONTHS AGO ABOUT THE ROADWAY.

THAT'S ONE TO THE SOUTH. THAT'S THE VILLAGE AT WALNUT HILL SOUTH. IS THAT CONNECTED WITH THIS OR

NOT? >> THIS NORTH SOUTH WILL CONNECT

INTO THAT ONE. >> INTO THAT ONE.

WE HAD A DISCUSSION THEY DIDN'T WANT TRAFFIC.

>> GOT IT. >> IT'S THE GAP BETWEEN THE TWO.

I UNDERSTAND THE DESIRE TO MOVE THE WALKING TRAIL OUT OF THE DRAIN AGE DITCH. I'M IN SUPPORT OF THAT.

THE ONLY QUESTION I HAVE CAN YOU SPEAK AGAIN ON WHERE YOU WANT TO PUT IT AND ARE WE TALKING WITHIN 6 FOOT WIDE STRAIGHT ALONG THE ROAD. OR OFF SET?

>> IT WILL BE SET ONE FOOT OFF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AS ALWAYS OF OUR TRAILS ARE. YOU HAVE RIGHT-OF-WAY.

WE TAKE THROUGH AND PUSH TO

[02:17:03]

>> SPEAKER: WHAT WE'RE DOING TONIGHT IS SETTING OUT THE RULES OF WHAT THEY CAN BUILD SO WHAT THIS SAYS IS THERE WILL BE A PLAN DEVELOPMENT OF 2.86 UNITS PER ACRE.

THE PLAQUE MAY BE SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT BUT THAT'S THE MOST THEY CAN DO.

THEY CAN COME BACK AND REPRODUCE OR ASK FOR THAT BUT WE HAVE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND REALLY LOOKING AT THE WAY THIS IS BUILT OUT. HOW MANY ACRES DID YOU BUY?

>> WE HAVE A LITTLE BIT OVER 3 ACRES. >> OUR NEXT-DOOR NEIGHBOR HAS THE FIRST TWO. WE HAVE THE NEXT TWO. THERE ARE EITHER 3 ACRES OR NEIGHBOR IN HALF. IT'S NICE TO KNOW THAT THERE'S GONNA BE A TALL BLOCK SO THAT NEXT-DOOR NEIGHBORS CAN HAVE A LITTLE FROM EACH OF THOSE HOUSES.

WE CAME TO TEXAS FROM CALIFORNIA TO GET AWAY FROM THE URBAN MASS.

WE LIVED ON THE ACCESS STREET OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. PEOPLE WERE LITERALLY ON 30 FEET WOULD GO 60 MILES AN HOUR TO GET INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. NOW WE BOUGHT THIS BEAUTIFUL LITTLE HOUSE ON 3 ACRES ON LITTLE COUNTRY ROAD THAT HAS 12 HOUSES ON IT.

NOW HE MOVE IN AND FIVE DAYS LATER FIND OUT THAT THEY'RE GOING TO OPEN OUR BEAUTIFUL LITTLE COUNTRY ROAD 216 HOUSES WHICH MEANS OVER 200 CARS HAVE THE POSSIBILITY OF GOING DOWN

OUR ROADS. >> ACTUALLY ONE OF THE THINGS THAT THEY'RE GOING TO GET TIES INTO OTHER PARTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT. FOR ONE THING THERE'LL BE NORTH AND SOUTH ROADS THAT WILL GO THERE AND PEOPLE WILL BE ABLE TO LEAD OFF AND GO TO OTHER DIRECTIONS. THERE'S OTHER PARTS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT WHICH THE APPLICANT PROBABLY FINDS IT MORE APPLICABLE TO SPEAK ON THAT. AS FAR AS THE SPEED OF THE THINGS THAT'S INTERESTING AS A DEVELOPMENTS WITH MORE HOUSES AND MORE CARS THAT ACTUALLY SLOWS THINGS DOWN. WILL THERE BE SPEED FROM'S QUESTION THAT MAY BE BUT THAT SOMETHING YOU WILL HAVE. IF A PROBLEM ARISES USUALLY WHAT IT TAKES IS POLICE OFFICERS OUT THERE TO GET TICKETS FOR A FEW WEEKS. WE'VE SEEN THAT IN LAKE GROVE.

HEY GAVE PEOPLE A FEW TICKETS. >> TOO BAD WE WALK THE HOUSE.

>> THAT'S USUALLY HOW IT ADDRESSED BECAUSE WE DO HAVE THOSE ISSUES.

>> ARE USED TO DRIVING DOWN THOSE ROADS QUICKLY. IT'S NOT SO MUCH THE

[02:20:15]

DEVELOPMENTS BUT IT'S PEOPLE THAT HAVE RED LIVED ON ROADS LIKE THIS FOR 30 YEARS AND HAVE ALWAYS DRIVEN 50 MILES AN HOUR ON HIS COUNTRY ROADS AND FINALLY THERE'S PEOPLE RIDING THEIR BIKES AND GOING THROUGH THERE. IT WILL CHANGE YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD AND IN SOME WAYS IT WILL MAKE IT BETTER. IS THAT WALNUT RAIN WE'RE LOOKING AT? THERE'S GOING TO BE A SIDEWALK IS TALKING ABOUT DEVELOPING

ALONG THE WAY. >> I WANT TO BE SURE THAT WE ARE ON THE SAME PAGE FROM WHAT I WAS HEARING. LET ME BACK UP A LITTLE BIT. THE WALL IS ON THAT SIDE.

>> ON THE SIDE IT'S JUST WOODEN FENCE. >> WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE

WALL HERE. >> THE SENTENCE SITS ON THAT SIDE.

>> OF THE WOOD FENCES UP ON THE TOP TWO. >> THIS IS CONSIDERED OPEN SPACE. IT'S RESIDENTIAL AND I DON'T NECESSARILY HAVE THE MATTER.

THERE IS A REQUIREMENT FOR FENCING. >> THE FACT THAT THERE IS OPEN SPACE HAS A COMMON AREA THAT MEANS IT'S OPEN TO THE DEVELOPMENTS.

>> YOU HAVE A GRAPHIC OF WHAT THAT ENTRY IS GOING TO LOOK LIKE?

>> THE WHOLE GREEN AREA BEHIND THERE'S OPEN SPACE AND THAT GREEN DOT AREAS OPEN SPACE.

>> THERE ARE NO HOUSES THERE AND THAT'S FOR CONTENTIONS NORTH.

IT BRINGS IN THE WATER DOWN. THAT'S THE NATURAL FLOW. >> IS OF THE QUESTIONS WE HAD.

>> THANK YOU WE APPRECIATE IT. >> DO WE HAVE ANY FOLLOW-UP FOR THE APPLICANT OR FOR STUFF

QUESTION. >> I HAVE A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT.

>> MY ONLY CONCERN, CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, ESSENTIALLY YOU ARE ADDING ACREAGE.

YOUR INTENT TO START ACREAGE AND DEVELOP IT IN THE EXACT SAME MATTER IN WHICH YOU

ALREADY DEVELOPED OR PLAN TO DEVELOP THE EXISTING PD. >> THAT IS CORRECT X NOT

INCREASING DENSITIES OR CHANGING LOT SIZES OR SETBACKS. >> THAT IS CORRECT.

>> WHAT IS THE PROPOSED I'M FEELING GOOD TONIGHT. WHAT IS THE THE PROPOSED

FENCING ON THOSE RIGHT THERE? >> IT WILL BE A BUILDER FENCE AND IT WILL BE AROUND THE HOMES AS THEY ARE CONSTRUCTED. THERE WOODEN FENCES BUT THEY STILL HAVE POSTS.

>> WOULD YOU BE OPPOSED, I WON'T ASK FOR MASONARY, WOULD YOU BE OPPOSED TO PUTTING IN A BOARD ONBOARD PRIVACY FENCE DOWN THE ENTIRE RUN? DO WE ACCOUNT OTHERS SEVEN LOTS

OF THAT RESIDENT OF ONE. >> I CANNOT THE DEVELOPER TO CONSIDER THAT.

[02:25:05]

>> NORMALLY WHEN I BUILD A HOUSE THAT YOU BUILD A VERY NICE FENCE THAT HAS STEEL POSTS AND STILL RUNS. IT IS GOING TO BE A NICE FENCE THAT WILL BE BUILT BY SOME OF THE BEST BUILDERS HERE IN TOWN. I KNOW YOU'RE SAYING. YOU'RE ASKING FOR IT TO BE ON ONE TIME. FOR THE BENEFIT OF THEM HAVING AND BEING A GOOD NEIGHBOR SO TO SPEAK. TO THIS IN THE AREA THAT YOU WANT TO DEVELOP AND TO ALLEVIATE THE CONCERN OF THOSE FIRST COUPLE LOTS. I THINK IT WOULD BE PRETTY

COMPARABLE. >> BRANDON SAID YES HE CAN DO THAT.

>> IS AGAINST LARGER LOTS AND PEOPLE HAVE HARDWARE FENCES. I KNOW THAT FENCES BETWEEN THE

PROPERTIES NOW. >> THE PROBLEM IS IF YOU BUILD THOSE FENCES PIECEMEAL HOW DO YOU KEEP THE BARBED WIRE FENCES FROM GETTING LOOSE QUESTION MARK WE HAD THAT ISSUE AND THE DEVELOPER BUILT THE ENTIRE FENCE AT THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT.

>> I HAVE A QUESTION. I LIKE TO SEE CONSISTENCY IN THE FRONT YARDS.

WE HAVE SEVERAL LOTS WHERE THERE IS A CORNER SIDE YARD. I LIKED HER TO BE THE YARDS

MAINTAINING THE SAME SETBACK ON BOTH STREETS. >> WE ACTUALLY DO THAT WHERE THE BEST EXAMPLE OF THAT IS THE CARVER HERE. HE SAID THE THREE IT'S RIGHT THERE. THAT SIDE YARD DOES MATCH THE FRONT OF THOSE HOUSES.

YOU NOTICE THOSE SIDE ONES ARE BIGGER. >> WILL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE

A PUBLIC HEARING. >> SECOND. ON FAVOR.

>> THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED. A DISCUSSION EMOTIONS?

>> I SUPPOSE IF THERE IS NO FURTHER QUESTION I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.

>> IT'S WITH THE DEVELOPER TO CONSTRUCT THE CONTINUOUS 6 FOOT PRIVACY FENCE.

IT'S FROM WALMART LANE DOWN TO THE VERY BOTTOM CORNER. WE HAVE LAWYERS TO FIGURE OUT EXACTLY WHAT WE CALL THAT THAT WE IT'S NOT AN ISSUE TO THE PROPERTY OWNER DIRECTLY.

>> MAY ASK YOU QUESTION. >> IS A CONDITIONAL? >> YES.

>> WE'RE GOING TO SAY AND I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT BECAUSE THE FRONT ENTRY RASH IS

PROHIBITED. >> THAT'S THE MOTION. WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE WITH THE CONDITION OF THE FENCE ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY AS DISCUSSED WITH THE CONDITIONS

RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. TO HAVE A SECOND? >> JUST FOR CLARIFICATION ARE WE SAYING HERE THAT THE TRAIL SYSTEM YOU ARE LOOKING FOR WILL STAY WITHIN THE SCREEN AREA?

>> MY APOLOGIES ON THAT. THE TRAIL SYSTEM I'M OKAY WITH IT MOVING OVER.

>> TO YOUR CONDITION IS ACTUALLY FOR THE SYSTEM TO BE SHIFTED OVER.

>> THAT WILL STRIKE OUR CONDITION OF NUMBER TWO. YOU GUYS ARE IN FAVOR OBVIOUSLY

OF CHANGING THE CONFIDENCE OF PLAN. >> THEN JUST FOR CLARIFICATION YOU'RE LOOKING FOR EVERY SINGLE LOT TO BE J SWING OR SIDE ENTRY.

>> AS YOU SUGGEST. >> FOR STUFF WE'RE LOOKING AT THE CONFERENCE OF PLAN.

>> I THINK THE CITY COUNCIL HAS BASICALLY BEEN PRETTY CLEAR ON THAT AND MOST OF THEIR

HEARINGS. >> EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES. >> WE HAVE A MOTION AND THAT'S

CLARIFIED BY MARCOS. TO HAVE A SECOND? >> WE HAVE A SECOND BY THE

COMMISSIONER. ON FAVOR? >> I.> ANY POST?

[02:30:05]

THE MOTION CARRIED LY. WE ARE NOW ON O AGEN0. IT IS TO CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING

[Item 010]

BY ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2.0 FOR USE TABLES BY MENDING SECONDARY RIGHTS.

>> WERE GONNA GIVE THE COMMISSIONER HERE. >>.

>> AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 10. >> IS A ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2.04.

IF YOU ARE IN A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL RESIDENCE SUCH AS SF TWO THROUGH FOUR.

TO HAVE A SECONDARY LING THERE ARE CERTAIN PARAMETERS WITHIN SECTION 3.570 YOU HAVE TO MEET.

THE PROCESS TAKES APPLICATIONS FROM 30 TO 65 DAYS. WE DID SOME RESEARCH AND OVER HOW MANY SECONDARY DWELLING CASES WE'VE HAD IN THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS.

WE'VE HAD ABOUT EIGHT CASES COME BEFORE YOU. 100% OF THOSE WERE APPROVED AND THE APPLICANT WITHDREW THEMSELVES. THEY WANTED TO WAIT TO FIGURE OUT WHAT THEY REALLY WANTED TO DO. THE OTHER SEVEN WHERE UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. I THINK THERE'S ONE OF THEM THAT A CONDITION ON IT.

THEY HAD SECULAR PAINT ON IT. ALTHOUGH NOT THEY MET THESE MEMORY REQUIREMENTS AND SEXUAL 3.5700. AS WE GO THROUGH ACCUSATIONS WE ARE LOOKING FOR WAYS TO MAKE THIS PROCESS A LOT EASIER. A LOT OF THE ANTS COME BEFORE THEY ARE NOT DOING THIS FOR A LIVING. IF THEY ARE BUILDERS THEY DO THIS OCCASIONALLY.

IN THE SECONDARY DWELLING THEY HAVE VERY STRICT STANDARDS. IT PROHIBITS IT FROM BEING RENTED OUT IN THE FUTURE THE DESIGN HAS TO MATCH THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE THAT ONLY WILL SAVE THE APPLICANT TIME IT WILL MAKE THIS HOME DEVELOPMENT PROCESS A WHOLE LOT EASIER FOR EVERYDAY PERSONNEL. WE DO RECOMMEND THAT THOSE DISTRICTS, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS ARE USED FOR SPECIFIC USE PERMIT IF THEY MEET THE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 3.5700. WE DO HAVE THIS THAT THEY ARE ADDING AND THAT'S SOMETHING THAT THEY WANTED VARIANCE FROM. THEY ARE ASKING FOR A SPECIAL EXCEPTION THAT'S WHEN THEY COME IN FOR THE CITY COUNCIL FOR SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. WE DO RECOMMEND APPROVALS WHICH REQUIRE PUBLIC HEARING AND I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME.

>> IF SOMEONE BUYS INTO A NEIGHBORHOOD THAT HAS RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS THIS DOESN'T CHANGE THAT. THIS BASICALLY AFFECTS PEOPLE THAT ARE REALLY OUT THERE AND

HAVE ADDED NEIGHBORHOOD RESTRICTIONS. >> MADE A MOTION TO CLOSE A

PUBLIC HEARING. >> WEAVE A MOTION BY THE COMMISSIONER.

>> I WILL SECOND THAT MOTION. IN FAVOR, I. ANY OPPOSED QUESTION FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED. ANY DISCUSSIONS OR MOTIONS QUESTION MARK.

>> WITH A MOTION TO APPROVEA SECOND TO IMPROVE. ON FAVOR.NY OPPOSED QUESTION

[02:35:03]

MARK. >> THE MOTION TO AMEND THE ORDINANCE CARRIES.

[Item 011]

NOW WE'RE ON TO AGENDA ITEM 11 WHICH IS CONSIDERED THE DOWNTOWN PLAN.

>> INTO BEEN HERE FOR A LITTLE BIT I WILL GO TO NEXT AND THIS IS LONG AS POSSIBLE.

>> I WANT TO HEAR WHERE PNC'S OFFICES CAN BE IN THAT FANCY BUILDING.

>> WERE JUST OUT HERE ON THE STREET RIGHT HERE. >> ON MARCH 26, 2019 THE CITY CAME AT THE DIRECTION OF CITY COUNCIL. WE ENTERED INTO A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT BEING SOLD WITH THE CONSULTANT TO PROCESS THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN.

THE WHOLE PURPOSE OF THE DOWNTOWN PLAN IS TO REINVEST WHAT DOWNTOWN IS DOING.

IF YOU GO INTO THE COVID 19 EVENTS IT WAS HUGE SUCCESS. MANY PEOPLE SHOW UP TO THESE THINGS. OUR DOWNTOWN OTHER THAN THAT IS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY DURING WORK HOURS. PEOPLE ARE DOWNTOWN. IT'S A REALLY HISTORIC DOWN TOWN. THESE BUILDINGS WITH ARCHITECTURAL STYLES STAND OUT.

WE'VE DONE REINVESTMENTS. PROPERTY OWNERS HAVE MAINTAINED THESE BUILDINGS TO KEEP THEM THERE. THERE'S OTHER BUILDINGS THAT HAVE A LOT OF POTENTIAL.

THEY MAINTAIN OTHER BUSINESSES. WE WILL BE BRINGING THE SIGNING BACK FOR APPROVAL THAT ARE OWNED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. SECTION 1 INTRODUCTIONS HAVE A DOWNTOWN PLAN AND IT'S INTENDED FOR THE OVERALL STRATEGY FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AND WHAT TO LOOK LIKE IN THE AREA.

THIS INCLUDES THE DESIGN BUILDING FOR PUBLIC SPACES AND BRANDING STRATEGIES.

THE ULTIMATE GOAL OF THIS DEVELOPMENT IS TO PRESENT INNOVATIVE AND REALISTIC VISIONS AND STRATEGY FOR STRENGTHENING DOWNTOWN AS AN ECONOMIC DRIVER.

EVERYTHING I'M SHARING FOR YOU TONIGHT IS WITH THE DOWNTOWN PLANNING AND SHOULD HAVE A COPY OF THAT IF YOU LIKE IT. THE DECISIONS THAT YOU DO MAKE WE HAVE CASES NEXT TO DOWNTOWN THAT ARE NECESSARY. WITH THE INTRODUCTION OF IT GOES THROUGH IN SECTIONS.

THEIR PAST PLANNING EFFORTS AND WE TALKED A LOT ABOUT IT A LOT WITH THE VISION.

ANOTHER STUDY THAT WAS DONE BACK IN 2009 WAS A VISION AND DOWNTOWN SUMMARY REPORT.

THERE ARE KEY POINTS OF THE DOWNTOWN AREA. >> IF YOU TALK TO ANY OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS THEY CARE ABOUT THEIR BUILDINGS. THEY CARE ABOUT THE DOWNTOWN.

THIS IS WHAT MAKES IT. THIS IS SOMEWHERE WHERE YOUR FAMILIES WANTING TO COME WITH BUSINESSES WANTING TO COME. THEY WANT TO PROTECT THE STRUCTURES.

WE GET PEOPLE TO COME BACK DOWN AND REINVEST. THE KEY BUSINESSES THAT ARE DOWNTOWN TO MAINTAIN TO HELP ENCOURAGE GROWTH AND REDEVELOPMENT.

>> DURING THIS PROCESS WE NEEDED PUBLIC OUTREACH. THERE'S VARIOUS EVENTS.

WE GET PEOPLE TO PARTICIPATE AND WE HAD A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF PARTICIPATION THROUGH THE ENTIRE PROCESS. YOU CAN SEE THE MEANS THAT WE HAD LISTED FOR PUBLIC OUTREACH.

PEOPLE THAT OWN THE PROPERTY DOWNTOWN ARE THE ONES I CARE ABOUT IT.

WE HAD OPEN HOUSES AND DESIGN SHREDS ANYONE THAT CAN DISSIPATE IN.

KIND OF GOING TO THE DATES WE HAD A COMES THROUGH AND IT'S TOWARDS DOWNTOWN.

IT'S A REALLY GREAT EXPERIENCE TO SHOW THEM THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE.

THERE'S A COUPLE BUILDINGS THAT THEY PLAN AND I'M A HUGE FAN OF IT.

ONE OF THEM ARE THE LAWSON BUILDINGS. REALLY COOL ARCHITECTURE.

THERE'S A LOT OF POTENTIAL THERE. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT THEY DID PLAN AND LIKEWISE WHERE WOODROW'S CAFCIS. WE LISTEN TO WHAT THE PUBLIC SAYS AND WE REALLY PUT IN THE PLAN. ONE OF OUR GOALS IS TO HAVE IT

[02:40:05]

EXTEND FURTHER DOWN. THROUGH THE DOWNTOWN AREA BECAUSE WE REALLY WANT US TO BE PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED. DOWNTOWNS ORIGINALLY DESIGNED FOR PEDESTRIANS.

WE REALLY WANT TO GO BACK TO THAT. WE ACTUALLY HAD WITH THE AVERAGE WALKING DISTANCE FROM THE PARKING SPOT HEARING DOWNTOWN TO THE BUSINESS.

ONE OF THE COMPLAINTS IN ONE OF THE THINGS THAT PEOPLE DON'T REALIZE IS THAT THEY ARE WILLING TO WALK FURTHER. WE HAVE A LOT OF REALLY COOL THINGS HERE IN THE DOWNTOWN WITH PARKING. YOU WANT TO BE ABLE TO SEE FUTURE TEXTS AS PLANS AND ZONING AMENDMENT. THERE'S MORE ADVISORY MEETINGS WITH PEOPLE FROM THE COMMUNITY THAT HAVE INTEREST IN IT. THIS IS THE OPEN HOUSE WHERE WE HAVE STAFF INCLUDING MYSELF.

WE HAD THEM COME IN AND LOOK AT PIECES WITH DIFFERENT EXHIBITS. ONE OF THE COOL PIECES AS WE HAD A SURVEY DONE ONLINE WITH HUGE OUTREACH. HAD A LOT OF RESPONSES WITH THE SURVEY. WE DEFINED SOME BOUNDARIES WITH THE DOWNTOWN PLAN.

THIS IS WHAT WE STARTED OFF WITH. THIS IS THE ORIGINAL TALENT.

AFTER OUR MEETINGS AND DISCUSSIONS WE NARROW THAT DOWN BECAUSE IT IS A LOT MORE DIFFICULT TO PLAN AN AREA THIS LARGE. OVER TIME THIS IS SOMETHING WE WANT TO THINK ABOUT. IT'S OUR MAIN FOCUS RIGHT NOW AND IT'S GOING TO SPELL OUT TO THESE OTHER AREAS. THAT'S HIM AND THAT WE ARE KEEPING IN MIND.

THESE BUILDINGS HAVE BEEN HERE FOR YEARS UPON YEARS FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS AND WE WANT TO CONTINUE THAT. IT'S AMAZING WHEN YOU SEE THESE BUILDINGS BUILT FOR HUNDREDS OF YEARS STILL STANDING AND WE HAVE BUILDINGS THAT ARE BUILT 50 TO 20 YEARS AGO THAT ARE CRUMBLING. THE ARCHITECTURE WAS DIFFERENT. THIS IS OUR AREA FOCUS RIGHT NOW. AS TIME GOES ON TO EXPAND THIS AREA.

WHEN WE DID THIS WITH THAT THE ANALYSIS THAT WE GOT BACK. WE LISTEN TO THE PUBLIC AND WHAT THEY HAD TO SAY. WE WENT DOWN INTO THE SURVEYS AND DROVE AROUND THESE AREAS.

THEY TREATED IT WITH THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND UNDERSTANDING.

WHY DO PEOPLE COME TO THESE AND WE HAVE VARIOUS INDUSTRIES THAT PROMOTE PEOPLE TO COME HERE.

WE GET PEOPLE TO COME HERE AND THEY GO TO THE HOSPITAL. THE VISION OF REVIEW IS DOWNTOWN AND IT'S A SAFE WALKABLE ENVIRONMENT. IS ENJOYED BY VISITORS ALIKE AND IT'S THE HEART OF THE COMMUNITY. WE ARE SEEING SOME OF THAT HAPPEN NOW AND WE SEE IT SO THEY COME OVER. THIS IS HOW WE WANT TO SEE DOWNTOWN. THIS IS HOW WE SEE IT. THE SECTION 3 DOWNTOWN VISION OF THE PLAN IS BROKEN INTO FOUR DIFFERENT CATEGORIES LAND-USE, CHARACTER PLAN, IT IS STRAIGHT OF MASTER PLAN AND STREET SECTIONS. THE LAND-USE PLAN SHOWS WHAT TYPE OF LAND USES THEY EXPECT TO SEE DOWNTOWN AND HOW DO THEY SEE AREAS CHANGING OVER TIME.

IT'S INTENDED TO BE THE BLUEPRINT FOR THE STUDY AREAS WITH INTEGRATION FOR USE OF THESE AREAS. THIS IS WHERE THEY SHOW THE EXPANSION AND TRANSITION AREAS.

ONE THING I WOULD LIKE TO READ. THROUGHOUT THIS DOCUMENT IF YOU READ IT OVER AND OVER AGAIN THIS IS NOT JUST A CITY BUILD. WE WANT TO BUILD A CITY STRUCTURE HERE.

THIS IS A PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP. WE REALIZE THAT WE NEED THE PRIVATE PLAN INVOLVED IN THIS PROCESS. THEY REINVEST IN THE

[02:45:11]

PROPERTIES. WE UNDERSTAND THAT'S GOING TO TAKE ASSISTANCE FROM THE CITY AS WELL TO MAKE THESE THINGS HAPPEN. THE FIRE LOOKING AT THINGS WITH

WHAT WE CAN DO TO ENCOURAGE THIS REDEVELOPMENT. >> OF THE DOWNTOWN VISION SHOWING WHAT IT CAN LOOK LIKE OVERTIME OF THE THINGS THAT WE DID BREAK IT DOWN INTO HIS 16 ILLUSTRATIVE PLANS.UMBER FIVE IS JUST ONE EXAMPLE AND I ENCOURAGE YOU TO LOOK AT THE DIFFERENT FUNCTIONS AND ORGANIZING ELEMENTS FOR THE HEART OF DOWNTOWN.

ONE OF THE QUESTIONS POSED WAS DEEMED MISSED THIS AREA AND THE SPACE FOR SOMETHING ELSE? DO NOT DO THAT. OUR CONSULTANTS ADVISE AGAINST IT.

WE TALKED ABOUT TIME AND TIME AGAIN HOW MANY TIMES WE REQUIRE DEVELOPERS TO BUILD SIDEWALKS.

IN ORDER FOR SOMEONE TO WALK THEY HAVE TO HAVE A REASON TO WALK.

ONCE AGAIN THE QUESTION POSED EARLIER TONIGHT WAS HOW FAR IS THE PARK FROM THIS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION. WOULD YOU LIKE A CHILD TO WALK THEIR QUESTION MARKET THE STREETSCAPE WAS DESIGNED DIFFERENTLY WHERE DON'T LIKE HIM TO BE HIT BY A CAR I WAS IN A CD DIDN'T WANT A BIKE I WAS ENCOURAGED NOT TO LIKE TO WORK. WE DON'T WANT THAT.

THAT'S A CLEAT OPPOSITE OF WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO PROMOTE HERE. WE ARE TRYING TO PROMOTE A STREETSCAPE THAT PEOPLE CAN ENJOY AND PARTICIPATE IN. ONE OF THE GREATEST THINGS ABOUT STREETSCAPES WHAT YOU CAN DO IS IF YOU DESIGN IT CORRECTLY PEOPLE WILL LOSE TRACK OF IT AND THEY WILL BE VISUALLY STIMULATIVE. IF YOU LOOK AT WASHINGTON D.C.

IS A GREAT EXAMPLE OF WHAT THAT WAS ORIGINALLY PLANNED. YOU DON'T REALIZE YOU JUST WALKED A MILE FROM ONE MEDIUM TO ANOTHER. THERE'S SO MUCH INVOLVED IN SO MUCH TO DO. ALSO WHEN YOU PLAN OUT YOUR STREETSCAPES PROPERLY.

IT ALLOWS FOR MARCH TO ENCOURAGE MY WALK ABILITY. WE HAVE TWO STREETSCAPES HERE IN FRONT OF YOU. THEY ARE TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT EXAMPLES.HIS IS MAIN STREET WITH THE MEDIAN. THIS IS A TIME WHERE YOU WOULD WANT TO MEDIAN BECAUSE OF POTENTIAL SPEEDS ON THE STREET THIS IS A LOCAL STREET. WHAT ON THE SIDEWALKS.

WE CONSIDER THIS TRIAL WITH THE PARKING DECK AREA. THERE'S TREES ON BOTH SIDES OF THE SITE DOWN. THESE TREES WITH THE WAY THAT THEY ARE DESIGNED TO ENFORCE TRAFFIC WITHOUT HAVING TO PUT ANY SPEED BUMPS. IT MAKES SOMEONE NATURALLY WANT

TO SLOW DOWN ON A PEDESTRIAN SCALE. >> SECTION 4 HAS AN ACTION PLAN AND WHAT IT'S DESIGNED TO DO IS ONCE AGAIN YOU SET THESE GOALS WITH GREAT IDEAS AND HOW YOU COMPASS THOSE GOALS. THAT'S THE WHOLE PLAN OF ACTION PLAN.

THAT'S WHERE WE ARE SEEING A LOT OF ISSUES WHEN THE RESTAURANTS COME DOWNTOWN.

THE ENGINEERS ARE OUT HERE AND IT CAN BE PRETTY COSTLY TO RENOVATED BUILDING TO BE A AND

[02:50:02]

MEET OUR CURRENT STANDARDS. IF THERE'S SOMETHING THE CITY CAN DO TO HELP ALLEVIATE THAT WE CAN CREATE THE SYSTEM. IT WOULD HELP RELIEVE SOME OF THOSE ISSUES THAT WE ARE SEEING

TO ENCOURAGE MORE DEVELOPMENT OUT THERE. >> IS AN EXAMPLE SHOWING THE RECOGNITION SOON. THEY DID BREAK IT DOWN SHOWING THE PINK SEWN WITH CURRENT REGULATIONS AND IT ENHANCES THE CITY'S DOWNTOWN EVENT CALENDAR AND UPGRADE THE PARKING.

THESE ARE IDEAS THAT ARE SUPER EASY TO DO A LOT EASIER THAN REDOING THE WHOLE SQUARE.

THESE ARE SIMPLE THINGS THAT CAN BE DONE QUICK TO SHOW THE PUBLIC WE'RE MOVING FORWARD TO SHOW PROGRESS. THAT'S THE BASICS OF THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN I WANTED TO PRESENT TO YOU TONIGHT TO DISCUSS IT. SOME OF YOU WENT TO THE EVENTS AND PARTICIPATED. THIS IS WHAT WE CAME UP WITH. THIS DOES NOT REQUIRE PUBLIC HEARING OR ANY ACTION ITEM BUT AGAIN WE CAN ANSWER ANY ITEMS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE.

>> IF YOU DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OUT PLEASE REVIEW THE DOCUMENT AND CONTACT ME IF YOU DO HAVE QUESTIONS. THESE ARE THINGS WE DEFINITELY WANT TO IRON OUT AND FIGURE OUT

WHAT THE BEST WAY TO MOVE FORWARD IS. >> THE ONLY QUESTION I HAVE IS , MAYBE THERE'S AN ANSWER AND MAYBE THERE'S NOT. THAT'S A VERY PRETTY PICTURE.

IN MY EXPERIENCE THAT WOULD TAKE SUBSTANTIAL PRIVATE PARTY INVESTMENTS.

>> ABSOLUTELY AGREE. >> DO WE HAVE A PLAN TO ATTRACT THAT? IS FIXING SOME OF THESE CHEAP THINGS IS ONE THING BUT WE HAVE TO PRETTY MUCH PUT A BIG COME

TO A SIGN ON OUR TOWNS. HOW ARE YOU GOING TO DO THAT. >> WE UNDERSTAND THAT THERE ARE CERTAIN LIMITATIONS THAT WE HAVE REGARDING HOW TO INVEST IN CERTAIN THINGS.

CAN YOU TAKE IT LITTLE BY LITTLE AND WE WANT PEOPLE TO UNDERSTAND THAT.

THIS WILL BE A TWO-YEAR INVESTMENT. MANY YEARS DOWN THE ROAD THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE PROCESS WE TRY TO PAINT THAT PICTURE BUT IT CAN BE LITTLE THINGS AT FIRST WITH POLICY CHANGES. WE'RE LOOKING AT HOW WE CAN MAKE CONCERNS ABOUT THAT YOU BPD. HOW TO MAKE THE PROCESS EASIER? THINGS LIKE THAT.

WHEN YOU START DOING THAT IT ENCOURAGES MORE REINVESTMENT. PEOPLE START LOOKING DOWNTOWN DIFFERENTLY. THERE ARE THINGS ON THERE THAT ARE A LOT SIMPLER.

OVER TIME WE HAVE TRUST IN THE PUBLIC AND WE'RE TRYING TO STRENGTHEN THE BOND WITH THE PUBLIC. THAT'S AN EASY MY PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS COMING IN.

IT WILL TAKE A LOT OF PRIVATE MONEY INVOLVED. I CAN'T TELL YOU HOW MANY COMMENTS WE'VE RECEIVED ABOUT MAIN STREET THAT EXISTS RIGHT NOW.

IF YOU KNOW WHICH ONE I'M TALKING ABOUT THAT WAS REALLY SIMPLE BUT DOING THINGS LIKE THAT SHOWS THE CITY DOES CARE ABOUT DOWNTOWN. IT'S JUST REINVESTED AND HAVING MORE EVENTS DOWNTOWN. EVERY FRIDAY HAVING A MOVIE NIGHT.

IF YOU'RE WITH A PROJECT THE MOVIE UP ON THE BUILDING. IT'S DOING THINGS LIKE THAT SO

I COMPLETELY AGREE WE TAKE A FEHUGE EFFORT. >> I KNOW THIS IS NOT A PUBLIC COMMENT BUT IF YOU WANT TO GET PRIVATE INVESTMENTS I CAN HAVE YOU WITH THAT.

>> OUR FAMILY HAS A NUMBER OF PROPERTIES ON MAIN STREET BUT WE ALSO WORK WITH ATTRACTING PEOPLE INTO THE COMMUNITY. MY DESK ADVICE TO YOU IS IN THOSE AREAS THAT YOU DESIGNATED AS AREAS THAT YOU WANT TO CREATE OPPORTUNITY AND YOU WANT TO CREATE ENERGY, BE OPEN-MINDED WHEN YOU SEE THINGS. I DON'T MEAN THROW THE RULEBOOK BUT I MEAN WE CUT SOME PRETTY HARD FAST RULES THAT RUN UP AGAINST MANY TIMES THAT CAUSE THINGS TO SLOW DOWN. FOUNDERS WROTE IS A GREAT EXAMPLE.

THIS MORNING WE HAVE 100% COMMITMENT IN THAT PROJECT BUT IT HAS TAKEN FOREVER.

NOT MUCH OF IT BECAUSE OF RULES. SOME OF IT IS JUST BECAUSE IT WAS NEW AND IT WAS CREATED. IT WAS COMPLICATED BECAUSE IT WAS NEW.

NOBODY HAD MOVED THAT NUMBER OF BUILDINGS THEN. WE LEARNED A LOT.

WE LEARNED A LOT BECAUSE I HELPED COORDINATE THAT. I WOULD JUST ENCOURAGE YOU.

[02:55:05]

YOU HAVE TO BE CAREFUL BECAUSE ONE OF THE THINGS THAT GETS CAUGHT UP IN A DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN AND MY EXPERIENCES MASSIVE OVERLAYS CREATE REGULATORY CONSTRICTIONS THAT CREATE COMPLICATIONS THAT YOU ALL MAY NOT THINK OF AS YOUR ROLE AS A PUBLIC SERVANT SITTING THERE.

FINANCING, IT'S MESSY WHEN YOU START PUTTING OVERLAYS IN PLACE THAT CREATES ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. FLEXIBILITY IS WHAT'S GOING TO WORK BEST.

I DID SOME WALKING DOWNTOWN TODAY AND TOOK A LOOK AT AN AREA THAT WOULD BE A REALLY COOL ONE BLOCK OFF THE TRUCK PARK. DON'T KNOW WHETHER WE CAN MAKE IT WORK, EVERYBODY STILL DREAMING ABOUT IT BUT HOW FUN TO HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO HAVE SOME OPEN SPACES LIKE THAT. IMMEDIATELY THE PEOPLE THAT WE ARE THINKING ABOUT DOING INVESTMENTS BEGAN TO RESPOND WITH THINGS LIKE YES, WE CAN'T DO THIS BECAUSE THE CITY HAS

SAID PUBLIC BATHROOMS. IT'S A NUMBER OF THINGS. >> I DON'T MEAN TO CUT YOU OFF BUT I'M RIGHT THERE WITH YOU. THAT'S THE MOST IMPORTANT PART OF THIS WHOLE THING.

FINDING OUT ABOUT A YEAR AGO STEPHEN CAME IN HERE FOR SOMETHING ON FOUNDERS WROTE FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING THAT I WAS OBSERVING. YOU ASKED I DID AND YOU CHANGED I DID. I'M RUNNING OUT OF WHAT I CAN DO TO MAKE THIS WORK.

WE AS A CITY CONTEMPLATED OR EVEN HAD A ROUNDTABLE WITH PEOPLE WHO ARE INTERESTED AND SAID HEY, THESE ARE TARGET ITEMS THAT ARE CONTINUALLY STUMPING US WITH EVERY SINGLE

MILESTONE. >> I WILL GIVE YOU FEEDBACK FROM A DIFFERENT ROLE.

I'M CURRENTLY SERVING AS THE PRESIDENT OF THE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS ASSOCIATION.

THERE'S A FINE LINE BETWEEN HOW MUCH FLEXIBILITY YOU HAVE AND HAVE RIGID YOU MAKE THE RULES.

HERE'S A REASON FOR THEM. I THINK WE HAVE TO BE THAT'S ONE OF THE THINGS YOU HAVE TO THINK ABOUT. IF YOU WANT TO CRITICAL TO HAVE PEOPLE COME AND WALK DOWNTOWN YOU BETTER FIGURE OUT WHERE THEY'RE GOING TO USE THE RESTROOM.

YOU CAN DO THAT CREATIVELY. AYBE WE CAN OUT THE FACILITY SOMEWHERE AROUND A FIRE STATION OR CITY HALL OR PARK. WE HAVE A PARK RIGHT DOWNTOWN THAT HAS NO RESTROOM FACILITIES. WE HAVE SOME OTHER PARKS THAT DO AND YOU CAN PUT EVERYTHING EVERYWHERE AT ONE TIME. JUST THINK ABOUT THOSE TYPES OF THINGS.

OR BE FLEXIBLE WHILE YOU'RE MAKING THE TRANSITION. MAYBE IT IS PART OF POTTIES AND HAND WASH STATION IF YOU'RE TRYING TO DO A FOOD TRUCK. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE SOLUTION IS BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT EACH CREATIVE OPPORTUNITY. JUST BE OPEN-MINDED IS THE THING THAT YOU NEED TO REALIZE THAT THE PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP.

IT COSTS A LOT TO DO THESE THINGS AND IT'S A BIG RISK THAT YOU TAKE.

IN ORDER TO TRY TO MAKE THINGS GOOD. I'VE BEEN A LONG TIME COMING.

SOME OF US MISTER OSBORNE AND I WERE AROUND WHEN PLAZA CAME IN. IT WAS A DREAM THAT WE HAD AND IT TOOK US ABOUT 5 TO 6 YEARS TO GET IT OFF THE GROUND AND THEN PROBABLY TWO OR THREE YEARS TO GET IT BUILT. NOW PEOPLE SAY WHAT A GREAT IDEA THIS WAS.

IT'S A LONG TIME COMING SIEGES HAVE TO BE CREATIVE AND WISE IN YOUR OUTWARD LUCK.

I'M GLAD TO SEE THAT YOU WIDEN THE SCOPE WITH THE IDEA OF GOAT TO THE FOOTPRINT OF THE ORIGINAL TOWN LONG TIME. AGAIN IF YOU CAN KEEP YOUR FOCUS WITHIN THOSE CONFINES FOR A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME WILL PROBABLY DO A BETTER JOB THAN IF WE SHOTGUN THE ORIGINAL TOWN. I JUST WANTED TO SAY THANKS. THE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS APPRECIATES THE FACT THAT THERE HAS BEEN INVESTMENT IN THE LOOK OF THE LONG-TERM MASTER PLAN.

I THINK I SPEAK PROBABLY FOR THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS THERE IF NOT MANY OF THEM TO SAY THAT WE THINK IT'S VIABLE AND VITAL THAT OUR CITY CORE STAY DOWN HERE. HOW IT LOOKS AND HOW YOU FUNCTION I THINGS THAT YOU GUYS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR WITH INPUT FROM US.I DO THINK THAT THOSE ARE GONNA BE A GOOD MOVES FOR US LONG-TERM. IT CREATES A MAGNET THAT KEEPS PEOPLE COMING.

THANK YOU FOR GIVING ME A SECOND I JUST WANTED TO GIVE YOU SOME INSIGHT.

IF YOU WANT TO KNOW HOW TO GET PRIVATE GUYS TO CONTINUE TO INVEST GIVE US A LITTLE

[03:00:02]

FLEXIBILITY TO TRY TO MAKE THE MATH WORK. >> ONE OF THE ISSUES WE HAD IS CONSIDERING ORDINANCE WOULD CHANGE. WE HAVE SET ORDINANCE WITH SIGNS THAT WE DESIGNED TO THEM HERE. THEY CONTRACT PEOPLE THEY ATTRACT BUSINESSES. DOWNTOWN WANT TO LOOK AT SIGNAGE THAT'S PART OF THE CHARACTER DOWNTOWN.HIS SENSITIVE ORDINANCE THAT WE SHOULD HAVE WITH THE SUBURBAN MODULE. WE NEED TO START THINKING ABOUT HOW WE MAKE THE RULES DIFFERENT FROM DOWNTOWN TO MAKE IT PROSPER AND GROW. FOR A LONG TIME WE HAD TO DO THE SAME. THEIR DIFFERENCES THE WAY YOU TREAT THE AREA IN THE DOWNTOWN

AREA. >> ANYTHING ELSE QUESTION. >> THANK YOU FOR THE PRESENTATION. LOOK FORWARD TO READING THROUGH IT AND A CHANCE TO PROVE.

ANY NEW BUSINESS OR COMMENTS FOR THE COMMISSION? >> I WILL ADJOURN TH

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.